DOCSLIB.ORG

KALLAVERE FORMATION on the NORTH ESTONIAN KLINT (Part I - Paldiski-Kunda Area)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LITHOLOGY OF THE KALLAVERE FORMATION ON THE NORTH ESTONIAN KLINT (Part I - Paldiski-Kunda area) HELJO HEINSALU AND REIN RAUDSEP Heinsalu, H. and Raudsep, R. Lithology of the Kallavere Formation on the North Estonian Klint (Part I- Paldiski-Kunda area). - Bull. of the Geological Survey of Estonia, 8/1, 20-31. In North Estonia the Kallavere Formation corresponds to the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary beds, the major part of which belongs to the lower Tremadoc. The stratigraphical range of the Kallavere Formation is variable: in the western part of the klint (North-Estonian cliff) it represents the lower half of the Pakerort Stage, in the east the whole stage. The Kallavere Formation is subdivided into five members: Maardu, Suurj5gi, Katela, Rannu and Orasoja. Three members - Maardu, Suurj5gi and Katela - occur in the western klint area, the eastern boundary of which coincides with the surroundings of Kunda. Part II of the article (eastern part of the klint) will be continued. Key words: lithology, Obolus sandstone, Kallavere Formation, Cambrian-Ordovician boundary beds, Estonia. Heljo Heinsalu: Institute of Geology, Estonia Avenue 7, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia. Rein Raudsep: Geological Survey of Estonia, Kadaka tee 80/82, 12 618 Tallinn, Estonia INTRODUCTION brachiopod material in the rock, however, is revealed by the content of Pp determined by chemical analysis. Usu­ In the western klint (local name for cliff of the bedrock) 5 ally Pp 5 makes one-third of the composition ofbrachio­ area the Kallavere Formation forms the lower part of the pod fragments (Figs. 2-5). Pakerort Stage, the Tiirisalu Formation corresponds to the In the composition of the Kallavere Formation upper part. Owing to the variable lithology of the we may distinguish three major lithological components: Kallavere Formation, as a result of the studies by differ­ 1. brachiopod coquina ("Obolus conglomerate"), 2. quartz ent researchers five members - Maardu, Suurjogi, Katela, sand(stone) with interbeds of dark graptolitic argillite and Rannu and Orasoja- have been distinguished in it in the 3. quartz sandstone enriched with phosphatic brachiopod entire klint area (Miiiirisepp, 1958a; 1960; Loog, 1964; detritus of small size. The first two components occur in Heinsalu, 1981; 1987). The Maardu((\-0 k/M), Suurjogi 1 different proportions in the Maardu Member, the third (O,kl S) and Katela (0// K) members are distributed in component, however, is known as a "detrital layer", dis­ the western region of the North Estonian Klint, consid­ tinguished as the Suurjogi Member in the section of the ered in the present paper. The eastern boundary of the Kallavere Formation. region coincides approximately with the Toolse-Kunda district. The Rannu((\-0//R) and Orasoja (O,kl 0) mem­ LITHOLOGICAL TYPES OF SECTIONS bers occur in the eastern part of the klint, between Kunda and Narva. (G -O klM) Maardu Member 3 1 The present article bases on the data of detailed lithological investigations of 15 differently exposed sec­ In the North Estonian Klint sections the Maardu Member tions, located on the North Estonian Klint (Fig. 1). The is generally characterized by quartz sand- or siltstone investigations were conducted already years ago, but the containing detritus or whole valves of inarticulate phos­ results have not been properly published yet. Field stud­ phatic brachiopods. There occur always also interbeds of ies have been conducted by the same researchers during dark kerogenous argillite (Dictyonema shale) in different a short time interval and the analysis performed by the numbers. In the sections east of Tallinn a layer of bra­ same analysts in the laboratory of the Geological Survey chiopod coquina has been recorded on the base of the of Estonia, using the same methodology. All this allows Maardu Member. of good comparability of the results. The granulometric The thickness of the member ranges from 0.5 m to composition of rocks was determined by the so-called 5.4 m, most often from 2 to 3 m. quartz method, which lies in the treatment of rocks with Detailed investigations have revealed high lateral aqua regia prior to analysis (Kazakov, 1957). In the present variability of the lithology of the Maardu Member. In the context this means the dissolution ofphosphatic brachio­ western part of the North Estonian Klint, four rather dis­ pod valves and their detritus. The content of phosphatic tinct types of sections (I-III and III/IV) can be distin- 20 I LITHOLOGY OF THE KALLAVERE FORMATION ON THE NORTH ESTONIAN KLINT (Part I - Paldiski-Kunda area) GULF OF FINLAND KEHRA QRAKVERE 0 TAPA 0 S2 en in a;w w '.2: en_, '.2: 0 ,0z Q Om 2 4 6 8 10 Fig. 1. Location and schematic cross-section of outcrops with lithostrathigraphical units of the Kallavere Formation. 21 ---.--- - TREMADOC TREMADOC TREMADOC TREMADOC TREMADOC Series : LOWER LOWER LOWER LOWER LOWER Subse~s~ Ulgose I Kollovere TOrlsolu TOrlsolu TOrisolu TOrisolu TOrisolu Formationi £Jul fl Kollovere !"I Kollovere !"I Kollovere Kollovere " " I Moardu Suur- 0 Suur- To~o- Suurj6gi 0 Moordu Suur- To~o- Moardu Suurj6gl 0 Member, 1%?u · Moordu sou Moordu 1%?u · sou 1%?u · j6gi j6gi j6gi 8,-0,klM €30,k/M €,-0,k/M G,-0,k/M O,ktS O,trT Index O,k/S O,trT O,k/S O,trT O,k/S 0,trT 83 0 1k/M O,k/S O,trT :':. ~ ~ .. .. g: "' g; "' 21 tel Thickness ~ 0 0 0 ~ "''" ~ 21 r I :::v (/) -; 5= C C c:...., ~ 0 0 0 :J :J C cii" 0 co 0. :J c 0 L < 0 "Q_ C 0 :::, -< ~ CD ~ ...., 0 ~ 0 (fl 3 Sl'I ? D ~ 0• 3 3 cii" "Q_ ~ 0 - z rn 9 G) ::r:: a rtT1 5· '-< ~ 0 'Tl N. (iq" (1) ::r:: 0. tT1 N ~ z ,_, CY [/) C ~ >­ (l) g r ;:> C: "'(l) N cf- N &. ~ 0 ::i u en ::,:1 0 I t71 >-+-, z ~ ::,:1 (l) >­ >-< c::: "1J u [/) :0 tT1 0 "cl 0 ~:::, '"'"cf- I I [1 ,I I ll • I I I I 9••• b ~ LITHOLOGY OF THE KALLAVERE FORMATION ON THE NORTH ESTONIAN KLINT (Part I - Paldiski-Kunda area) C ~ (D 0 © (D Samples .0 _Q2 X C Grain size distribution, % P,0 content,% ·m '5 a, -"' Lithology 5 E 0 Thick- No. <f)© .0 E a, D I :::J C <f) ~ 2 ~ ness. m lru ::, 6:, I- 5l -ca~ +2.00 ~ !2-V) 0 .!... __ (/) 0.70 u ~'.~~ 0 c,: 0 w ~ @ a, w~ c,: 9 > ..... .Q ::, :,a l1 12 0 0 0 " 2.35 :e 0)·- C,01 Maardu quarry :, 0 6::J I- -~ 3.45 ~ ~3 u 0.80 0 c,: l;~~ 0 w <( 2 @ w § ~ c,: .Q ..... ::, l1 12 ::e 0 2.20. 0 " :e ~ C,01 Ulgase ::, 6::J I- 5l -°cjl::_ +0.60 ;§ .Qu, 0 ·o, •O <n "§' u "0 1.30 0 c,: ~ 0 w <( 2 § @ w ~ _., H"> c,: .Q ..... :, :,a l1 12 0 3.50 0 "9.: :e 0) 22.Q~ C,01 Jdgala ::, 5l 0::, ] .2~-=o ~ :g,~ 0.80 u <n-O 0 c,: 0 w <( @ 2 a, w § c,: > ..... .Q ::, :,a l1 -g ~ 0 C/ :e o," .. ,., ~,ul Fig. 3. The western sections of Type II. 23 HEUO HETNSALU AND REIN RAUDSEP C al 0 Qj ill Samples '5 .Cl >< C Grain size distribution, % P,O, content, % E Q) -"" Lithology f-Th-ic_k_-~1-N-□-. 1~I Q) ) 0 E Q) u I <n ::, ::;:c :c I </) ~ I- ness, m Valkla ,::, ;:50 0 -w 0 ..!.. __ (./) 0 ""UJ I!! <( Q) ~~~ ~ ~ > UJ ~ Q ::, :,;; I- ~ 11 "" a "'- 1.45 a 0 ::;: .;, :~ """' 3.25 tt.88~ Q) Qi3 2.00 :5°'"' Turjekelder Q ..!.. __ en tv2ll717doVJ21272d ]'.~~ 0.55 0 0 @ ~WWI 0 UJ ::, <( "" g? :,;; Q 11 ~ a c5 2.90 UJ a " ~ ~ ::;: tG I-"" ~e}mfj ,.;. ;,.'.· ,,-./,;•,//,'.·,VZ1>•:",i:""'· ~ 1.60 Muuksi ::, 6:, I- Si l.70 ;:5 ~~ ·5, '.@. "' 0 ::, c5 0 ::, " 0 UJ <( "" "' :s: @ ~ Q) UJ 9 Q ""I- ::, :,;; ~ 11 a " ::;: ~ Fig. 4. The eastern sections of type II. 24 C ID Q) ~ Samples ID ·a3 .0 Q) ~ EX~ C lithology Grain size distribution, % P,O, content,% .0 Q)~ I~g I Thick- INo. ~ a ~ ~ C ~ ness, m N6mmeveski ,::, 80 6~ I- 2.75 ~~ ~c3 O> '.@ (/'J ::, 1.25 al 6" !!! Q) > £ u :!i ::, 0 '2 "' 0 UJ 0 5.00 "" 0 " ~ ::,; ~ UJ ~ B: Vihula u 0"" 0 UJ <{ ?; ::;; 0 Toolse Q u 0 0 !!' UJ"" ~ ~~ 4.30 ~ Q 0 UJ ~ B: ~ ~ "' 0,o.., s 0.50 £,ts Fig. 5. The sections of Type III and of Type III/IV (Toolse section). 25 HELJO HEINSALU AND REIN RAUDSEP guished in the sections of the Maardu Member. Differ­ sections with a higher frequency of argillite interbeds al­ ences between these types are caused by changes in ver­ ways show an increase in the amount of very fine (0.05- tical distribution of the above-mentioned lithological com­ 0.1 mm) quartz grains in sandstone (Fig. 2). ponents and their thicknesses. The thickness of the Maardu Member in Type I sec­ tions ranges from 1.4 to 3.25 m. Suurjogi Member (Oil S) The lower boundary of the Maardu Member is dis­ tinctly marked in Type I sections, but its upper boundary, The member is traditionally known as a "detrital layer" the contact with the Suurjogi Member (O/lS) is gradual. forming the upper part of the Kallavere Formation. In the The thickness of the transitional beds is 0.1-0.35 m. area studied the Suurjogi Member always lies on the The Suurjogi Member is represented by fine- to Maardu Member. Yet, as established by the data on mi­ medium-grained cross-bedded, generally weakly but on crofauna (conodonts), the Suurjogi Member is locally the outcrop surface often very strongly cemented quartz coeval with the Maardu Member (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Lisa 12. Õppeprogrammid

    Lisa 12. Õppeprogrammid

    Lisa 12. Õppeprogrammid KESKKONNAAMET Retk Viru rabas Keskus/asutus Lahemaa rahvuspargi looduskeskus, Palmse / Keskkonnaamet Läbiviimise koht Viru raba õpperada, 3,5 km Programmi Õppeprogrammi käigus läbitakse 3,5 km pikkune Viru raba õpperada. Õpperajal tehakse lühikirjeldus peatusi ning tutvustatakse ja viiakse läbi praktilisi ülesandeid järgmistel teemadel: soode tüübid ning nende tekkelugu; tüüpilisemad rabataimed ning taimede iseloomulikud tunnused liigniiskes kasvukohas; rabas elavad loomad, turbasammal – tema ehitus ja kasvutihenduse määramine; rabavesi – happelisuse, rabalaugaste läbipaistvuse ja temperatuuri mõõtmine; soode kuivendamine ja turbakasutus; jääksoo – taastumine, kasutusvõimalused ja taastumine. Täiedatakse tööleht ja vaadeldakse raba vaatetornist. Tegevused on kohandatud vastavalt kooliastmele. Läbiviimise aeg Kevad, sügis Programmi kestus Kuni 4 tundi Sihtgrupp II kooliaste, III kooliaste Maa sees on peidus meie ühine varandus – hoiame seda! Keskus/asutus Lahemaa rahvuspargi looduskeskus, Palmse / Keskkonnaamet Läbiviimise koht Lahemaa rahvuspargi looduskeskus, Palmse; Kool Programmi Mitmekülgsete tegevuse abil tutvutakse erinevate kivimite ja loodusvaradega. Uuritakse lühikirjeldus ja võrreldakse neid luubi ja/või binokulaaride abil, vaadatakse pilte, mängitakse õppemängu loodusvarade kasutamise kohta ning räägitakse sellest, millised on meie kodumaa loodus-ja maavarad ning miks neid on vaja hoida. Ekspositsioonisaalis tutvutakse meie maapõue aluskorra kivimitega ning pankranniku/klindi teemaga. Läbiviimise aeg
  • Estonian Ministry of Education and Research

    Estonian Ministry of Education and Research

    Estonian Ministry of Education and Research LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ESTONIA Tartu 2008 Estonian Ministry of Education and Research LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ESTONIA Estonian Ministry of Education and Research LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ESTONIA Tartu 2008 Authors: Language Education Policy Profile for Estonia (Country Report) has been prepared by the Committee established by directive no. 1010 of the Minister of Education and Research of 23 October 2007 with the following members: Made Kirtsi – Head of the School Education Unit of the Centre for Educational Programmes, Archimedes Foundation, Co-ordinator of the Committee and the Council of Europe Birute Klaas – Professor and Vice Rector, University of Tartu Irene Käosaar – Head of the Minorities Education Department, Ministry of Education and Research Kristi Mere – Co-ordinator of the Department of Language, National Examinations and Qualifications Centre Järvi Lipasti – Secretary for Cultural Affairs, Finnish Institute in Estonia Hele Pärn – Adviser to the Language Inspectorate Maie Soll – Adviser to the Language Policy Department, Ministry of Education and Research Anastassia Zabrodskaja – Research Fellow of the Department of Estonian Philology at Tallinn University Tõnu Tender – Adviser to the Language Policy Department of the Ministry of Education and Research, Chairman of the Committee Ülle Türk – Lecturer, University of Tartu, Member of the Testing Team of the Estonian Defence Forces Jüri Valge – Adviser, Language Policy Department of the Ministry of Education and Research Silvi Vare – Senior Research Fellow, Institute of the Estonian Language Reviewers: Martin Ehala – Professor, Tallinn University Urmas Sutrop – Director, Institute of the Estonian Language, Professor, University of Tartu Translated into English by Kristel Weidebaum, Luisa Translating Bureau Table of contents PART I.
  • Lisa 2. Loodushoiuobjektide Prioriteetsuse Hindamine

    Lisa 2. Loodushoiuobjektide Prioriteetsuse Hindamine

    Lisa 2. Loodushoiuobjektide prioriteetsuse hindamine RMK külastuskorralduslikust tegevusest tulenev prioriteetsuse hinnang (hinne 1- 5, kus 1 näitab väga kõrget prioriteetsust ja 5 väga madalat) antakse võttes aluseks külastajauuringu andmeid, loodushoiuobjektide külastatavust ja ligipääsetavust, maastiku atraktiivsust ja esteetilist väärtust puhkemaastikuna, eksponeeritavaid või säilitatavaid kaitseväärtusi, üle-eestilist või rahvusvahelist tähtsust, paiknemist matkateel, paiknemist majandusmetsas, loodushariduslikku tähtsust (programmide, ürituste korraldamise koht) jms. Prioriteetsuse hinnangu selgituse lahtris on selgitatud lühidalt põhiaspektid, millele hinnang tugineb. Hinnangufaktorid kirjeldada olulisuse järjekorras (üle- eestiline tähtsus, kõrge külastatavus, tugifunktsioon, kaitseväärtuste eksponeerimine ja säilitamine, loodushariduslik väärtus jms või siis põhjendus miks on hinnang madal). Loodushoiuobjektid on tabelis reastatud prioriteetsuse hinnangu järjekorras, üldjuhul suurema külastusmahuga loodushoiuobjektid eespool. Erandiks on matkatee, mis seob üle Eesti objekte. Kui loodushoiuobjektid moodustavad kogumeid (üks loodushoiuobjekt on teisele nö tugifunktsiooniks), siis on need koondatud tabelis kokku (näiteks matkarada ja raja alguses paiknev lõkkekoht, telkimisala ja telkimisala tegevusi laiendav matkarada jms). 1- väga kõrge 2- kõrge 3- keskmine 4- madal 5- väga madal Lahemaa rahvuspark Loodushoiuobjektid Prioriteetsuse Paikneb Prioriteetsuse hinnangu selgitus (prioriteetsuse alusel hinnang matkateel reastatud) RMK
  • Tsitre Piirivalvekordon Harjumaal Kuusalu Vallas

    Tsitre Piirivalvekordon Harjumaal Kuusalu Vallas

    Projekt „Eesti 20. sajandi (1870–1991) sõjalise ehituspärandi kaardistamine ja analüüs” 1 / 44 Projekt „Eesti 20. sajandi (1870–1991) sõjalise ehituspärandi kaardistamine ja analüüs” Tsitre piirivalvekordon Harjumaal Kuusalu vallas Sisukord 1. Kohustuslikud andmed .............................................................................................. 2 2. Asukoha skeemid ...................................................................................................... 3 3. Fotod.......................................................................................................................... 6 4. Täiendav info........................................................................................................... 42 Koostajad: Ain Tähiste, Mart Mõniste 2014 Projekt „Eesti 20. sajandi (1870–1991) sõjalise ehituspärandi kaardistamine ja analüüs” 2 / 44 1. Kohustuslikud andmed 1.1 Algne nimetus 6. piirivalvesalga 11. piirivalvekordon (Pjotr Rodionovi nim), s/o 2294-M, kutsung „Stražnik” 1.2 Hilisem(ad), sh praegune(sed) nimetus(ed) 1.3 Aadress Harju maakond, Kuusalu vald, Tsitre küla. Lähiaadress: Tsitre piirivalve objekti (2,8 ha), tunnus: 35203:001:0037 1.4 Koordinaadid 59°31′5.07″, 25°31′0.01″ 1.5 Algne teave, sh ajalugu 1.6 Praegune funktsioon Erastati 2008. aastal, kavas ümber ehitada puhkemajadeks. 1.7 Seisukorra hinnang 1.8 Ümbruse lühikirjeldus Kaugus merest 150 m. Kordonist 300 m läänes on randa suunduva tee ääres lagendikul betoonplaatidega kaetud 10x10 m plats. 1.9 Joonised Hoonete ja asukoha skeemid (6) 1.10
  • Developing the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) at Local Level - "DESI Local"

    Developing the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) at Local Level - "DESI Local"

    Developing the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) at local level - "DESI local" Urban Agenda for the EU Partnership on Digital Transition Kaja Sõstra, PhD Tallinn, June 2021 1 1 Introduction 4 2 Administrative division of Estonia 5 3 Data sources for local DESI 6 4 Small area estimation 15 5 Simulation study 20 6 Alternative data sources 25 7 Conclusions 28 References 29 ANNEX 1 Population aged 15-74, 1 January 2020 30 ANNEX 2 Estimated values of selected indicators by municipality, 2020 33 Disclaimer This report has been delivered under the Framework Contract “Support to the implementation of the Urban Agenda for the EU through the provision of management, expertise, and administrative support to the Partnerships”, signed between the European Commission (Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy) and Ecorys. The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. 2 List of figures Figure 1 Local administrative units by the numbers of inhabitants .................................................... 5 Figure 2 DESI components by age, 2020 .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 Users of e-commerce by gender, education, and activity status ......................................... 8 Figure 4 EBLUP estimator of the frequent internet users indicator by municipality, 2020 ............... 17 Figure 5 EBLUP estimator of the communication skills above basic indicator by municipality, 2020 .......................................................................................................................................................
  • Hara, Virve, Tapurla, Juminda, Tammistu, Leesi, Kiiu-Aabla, Kolga-Aabla, Pedaspea, Pudisoo, Tsitre, Andineeme) Kohta

    Hara, Virve, Tapurla, Juminda, Tammistu, Leesi, Kiiu-Aabla, Kolga-Aabla, Pedaspea, Pudisoo, Tsitre, Andineeme) Kohta

    2016 Kultuurilooline kirjeldus Juminda poolsaarel ja Kolga lahe ääres asuvate külade (Hara, Virve, Tapurla, Juminda, Tammistu, Leesi, Kiiu-Aabla, Kolga-Aabla, Pedaspea, Pudisoo, Tsitre, Andineeme) kohta PROJEKTI „LAHEMAA RANNAKÜLADE MÄLUMAASTIKUD“ I ETAPP MELIKA KINDEL SISUKORD SISUKORD ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 SISSEJUHATUS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 JUMINDA POOLSAARE PAIKNEMINE JA LOODUSLIKUD OLUD ............................................................................ 6 KÜLADE ADMINISTRATIIVSEST KUULUVUSEST JA KULTUURILISTEST ERIPÄRADEST ........................................... 7 ÜLEVAADE ARHIIVIALLIKATEST ......................................................................................................................... 11 RAHVALUULE JA ETNOGRAAFILISE AINESE KOGUMINE KOLGA RANNAST ........................................................ 12 1. HARA KÜLA ........................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 ÜLEVAADE KÜLA AJALOOST JA TRADITSIOONILISTEST TEGEVUSTEST ................................................. 14 1.2 ÜLEVAADE KULTUURILOOLISELT OLULISTEST PAIKADEST ................................................................... 15 1.3 ÜLEVAADE KULTUURILOOLISELT OLULISTEST ISIKUTEST JA PÄRIMUSEKANDJATEST
  • (Asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Kehra Aegviidu Aavere Alavere Anija

    (Asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Kehra Aegviidu Aavere Alavere Anija

    Riigihalduse ministri 11. oktoobri 2017. a määruse nr 72 „Asustusüksuste nimistu kinnitamine ning nende lahkmejoonte määramine” lisa 1 (riigihalduse ministri 03.06.2019 määruse nr 27 sõnastuses) Asustusüksuste nimistu HARJU MAAKOND ANIJA vald [jõust. 21.10.2017 Anija Vallavolikogu valimistulemuste väljakuulutamise päeval - Anija valla valimiskomisjoni 20.10.2017 otsus nr 7] Linn (asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Kehra Aegviidu Aavere Alavere Anija Arava Härmakosu Kaunissaare Kehra Kihmla Kuusemäe Lehtmetsa Lilli Linnakse Looküla Lükati Mustjõe Paasiku Parila Partsaare Pikva Pillapalu Rasivere Raudoja Rooküla Salumetsa Salumäe Soodla Uuearu Vetla Vikipalu Voose Ülejõe HARKU vald [jõust. 21.10.2017 Harku Vallavolikogu valimistulemuste väljakuulutamise päeval - Harku valla valimiskomisjoni 20.10.2017 otsus nr 12] Linn (asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Harku Adra Tabasalu Harkujärve Humala Ilmandu Kumna Kütke Laabi Liikva Meriküla Muraste Naage Rannamõisa Suurupi Sõrve Tiskre Tutermaa Türisalu Vahi Vaila Viti Vääna Vääna-Jõesuu JÕELÄHTME vald [jõust. 21.10.2017 Jõelähtme Vallavolikogu valimistulemuste väljakuulutamise päeval - Jõelähtme valla valimiskomisjoni 20.10.2017 otsus nr 9] Linn (asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Kostivere Aruaru Loo Haapse Haljava Ihasalu Iru Jõelähtme Jõesuu Jägala Jägala-Joa Kaberneeme Kallavere Koila Koipsi Koogi Kostiranna Kullamäe Liivamäe Loo Maardu Manniva Neeme Nehatu Parasmäe Rammu Rebala Rohusi Ruu Saha Sambu Saviranna Uusküla Vandjala Võerdla Ülgase KEILA linn [jõust. 21.10.2017 Keila Linnavolikogu valimistulemuste väljakuulutamise päeval - Keila linna valimiskomisjoni 20.10.2017 otsus nr 6] Linn (asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Keila KIILI vald [jõust. 21.10.2017 Kiili Vallavolikogu valimistulemuste väljakuulutamise päeval - Kiili valla valimiskomisjoni 20.10.2017 otsus nr 10] Linn (asustusüksus) Alevid Alevikud Külad Kiili Kangru Arusta Luige Kurevere Lähtse Metsanurga Mõisaküla Nabala Paekna Piissoo Sausti Sookaera Sõgula Sõmeru Vaela KOSE vald [jõust.
  • There Are Many Churches and Chapels That Are of Interest in the Eastern Part of Harju County, Which All Pilgrims Should Take a Look At

    There Are Many Churches and Chapels That Are of Interest in the Eastern Part of Harju County, Which All Pilgrims Should Take a Look At

    There are many churches and chapels that are of interest in the eastern part of Harju County, which all pilgrims should take a look at. The routes are recommended, and largely run away from major highways, allowing visitors the enjoyment of Harjumaa’s beautiful sights, all of its natural and cultural sights and its fishing villages and new settlements, life on mainland and life on small islands. The choice of transport is up to the pilgrim. You can travel on foot or by bicycle. There are places that you can reach by train. The most convenient option is to travel by car, but the areas around the capital have a good network of cycle and pedestrian tracks which is excellent for travelling by bicycle. PILGRIMAGE ROUTES IN EAST HARJUMAA ROUTE Tallinn-Viru Square - Viimsi Peninsula - Maardu - Jõelähtme Municipality - Kuusalu Town - Leesi & Juminda Peninsula - Loksa City - Viinistu Village - Raasiku Town - Pikva Village - Kose Town - Jüri Town - Kostivere - Tallinn Tallinn The pilgrimage to Harjumaa starts in Tallinn, and first of all we recommend heading towards Viimsi Peninsula. You can take bus No. 1 from the bus terminal in Viru Keskus in the heart of Tallinn or go by bicycle, on foot, or by car. When you start your journey, you will first have to use Pirita Road to reach the small town of Haabneeme, and thereafter you travel towards Püünsi. If you travel by bicycle, you can use the bicycle and pedestrian track. The entire Viimsi Peninsula is covered with bicycle and pedestrian tracks and the peninsula is very safe to travel around.
  • Lahemaa Lahemaa and Harju East the of Border the on (1) Island Klint Edge of a Large Platformal Structure

    Lahemaa Lahemaa and Harju East the of Border the on (1) Island Klint Edge of a Large Platformal Structure

    ©Environmental Board 2012 Board ©Environmental Loobu and Valgejõgi Rivers descend into their respective respective their into descend Rivers Valgejõgi and Loobu and Loobu. Only at Joaveski and Nõmmeveski, where the the where Nõmmeveski, and Joaveski at Only Loobu. and Printed by: Aktaprint PLC Aktaprint by: Printed few square kilometres between the rivers of Valgejõgi Valgejõgi of rivers the between kilometres square few Layout by: Akriibia Ltd. Akriibia by: Layout Klint traceable in the topography, encompasses an area of a a of area an encompasses topography, the in traceable Nõmmeveski Waterfall, L. Michelson L. Waterfall, Nõmmeveski KAAS Front page photo: photo: page Front the sands of the Littorina Sea and is therefore hardly hardly therefore is and Sea Littorina the of sands the on North Estonian North on is mostly buried under under buried mostly is which , (8) Cape Klint Joaveski Põhja-Eesti klint. Tallinn. klint. Põhja-Eesti three-step Vasaristi Cascade. Cascade. Vasaristi three-step Soesoo, A., Miidel, A. 2006. 2006. A. Miidel, A., Soesoo, Environmental Investment Centre Centre Investment Environmental National Park National the southern bank of the Valgejõgi Klint Bay, falls over the the over falls Bay, Klint Valgejõgi the of bank southern the klint. Eesti looduse sümbol. Tallinn. sümbol. looduse Eesti klint. Publication supported by supported Publication References: Suuroja, K. 2006. Põhja-Eesti Põhja-Eesti 2006. K. Suuroja, References: Vasaristi Stream, which descends into the klint valley from from valley klint the into descends which Stream, Vasaristi Compiled by: K. Kingumets K. by: Compiled LAHEMAA drops over the 1.2-metre-high Nõmmeveski waterfall. The The waterfall.
  • Lahemaa Are Rocky but the Mouths of Rivers Flowing Into the the Into Flowing Rivers of Mouths the but Rocky Are Lahemaa Porphyrite of Tammela, 4

    Lahemaa Are Rocky but the Mouths of Rivers Flowing Into the the Into Flowing Rivers of Mouths the but Rocky Are Lahemaa Porphyrite of Tammela, 4

    ©Environmental Board 2012 Board ©Environmental The Lord of the Palmse Manor is said to have given grain grain given have to said is Manor Palmse the of Lord The (Heaps of Hunger) lie. lie. Hunger) of (Heaps Näljakangrud the called piles rock Printed by: Aktaprint PLC Aktaprint by: Printed In a hayfield not far from the Palmse Manor, two huge huge two Manor, Palmse the from far not hayfield a In Layout by: Akriibia Ltd. Akriibia by: Layout KAAS rocks are nuns punished by Heavenly Father for their sins. sins. their for Father Heavenly by punished nuns are rocks L. Michelson L. Front page photo: Jaani-Tooma Big Rock, Rock, Big Jaani-Tooma photo: page Front the nuns until they petrified. Another story says that the the that says story Another petrified. they until nuns the ERRATIC BOULDERS ERRATIC Compiled by: K. Kingumets K. by: Compiled century, the devils stayed waiting for for waiting stayed devils the century, 15 the in closed th nuns at the Palmse convent. After the nunnery had been been had nunnery the After convent. Palmse the at nuns Environmental Investment Centre Centre Investment Environmental National Park National www.rmk.ee that the rocks are devils who used to go and peep at the the at peep and go to used who devils are rocks the that Publication supported by supported Publication [email protected] gigantic boulder which broke into pieces. A legend says says legend A pieces. into broke which boulder gigantic Phone +372 329 5555 +372 329 Phone LAHEMAA granite. The sharp-edged rocks probably originate from one one from originate probably rocks sharp-edged The granite.
  • O T S U S Kuusalu 28. Märts 2018 Nr 29 Kehtestatud Üldplaneeringute

    O T S U S Kuusalu 28. Märts 2018 Nr 29 Kehtestatud Üldplaneeringute

    O T S U S Kuusalu 28. märts 2018 nr 29 Kehtestatud üldplaneeringute ülevaatamine Võttes aluseks planeerimisseaduse paragrahvi 92, vallavolikogu eelarve- ja arengukomisjoni 20.03.2018 ettepaneku, Kuusalu Vallavolikogu o t s u s t a b: 1. Lugeda Kuusalu Vallavolikogu 19.12.2001 otsusega nr 68 kehtestatud Kuusalu valla üldplaneering ja Loksa Vallavolikogu 27.01.2000 määrusega nr 1 kehtestatud Loksa valla üldplaneering ülevaadatuks vastavalt lisale. 2. Jätkata punktis 1 nimetatud üldplaneeringute alusel töötamist kuni uue üldplaneeringu kehtestamiseni. 3. Otsus jõustub teatavakstegemisest. (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Kalmer Märtson volikogu esimees Lisa Kuusalu Vallavolikogu 28.03.2018 otsusele nr 29 Kuusalu valla üldplaneeringute ülevaatamine 1.Sissejuhatus Planeerimisseaduse paragrahv 92 sätestab kohaliku omavalitsuse volikogu üldplaneeringu üle vaatamise kohustuse. Üldplaneeringu ülevaatamise eesmärk on välja selgitada kehtiva üldplaneeringu ajakohasus, selle edasise elluviimise võimalused ja uue planeeringu koostamise vajadus. Seaduse kohaselt selgitatakse välja ja vaadatakse üle planeeringukohase arengu tulemused ja planeeringu edasise elluviimise võimalused; planeeringu vastavus planeerimisseaduse eesmärgile; planeeringu elluviimisel ilmnenud olulised mõjud majanduslikule, sotsiaalsele, kultuurilisele ja looduskeskkonnale ning oluliste negatiivsete mõjude vähendamise tingimused; planeeringutest ja õigusaktidest tulenevate muudatuste planeeringusse tegemise vajadus; kehtivad detailplaneeringud, et tagada nende vastavus üldplaneeringule,
  • Lahemaa Rahvuspargi Turismipiirkonna Kui Sihtkoha Kirjeldus Ning Lahemaa Rahvuspargi Turismipiirkonna Määratlus

    Lahemaa Rahvuspargi Turismipiirkonna Kui Sihtkoha Kirjeldus Ning Lahemaa Rahvuspargi Turismipiirkonna Määratlus

    1 2 Sisukord Sissejuhatus .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Lahemaa rahvuspargi ja Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna kui sihtkoha kirjeldus ning Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna määratlus ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Lahemaa rahvuspargi ülevaade ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2. Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna ülevaade ............................................................................ 7 2. Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna hetkeolukorra analüüs ........................................................... 15 2.1. Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna ressursside ülevaade ja hinnang ...................................... 15 2.2. Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna külastajate sihtrühmade ülevaade ................................... 24 2.3. Maailma- ja Eesti turisminäitajad ning -trendid .............................................................................. 27 3. Lahemaa rahvuspargi ja Lahemaa rahvuspargi turismipiirkonna olukorra analüüs (SWOT) ................ 31 4. Strateegilised eesmärgid (visioon, missioon, arengusihid ja -eesmärgid) ............................................ 36 5. Tegevuskava (2019-2024) ja tulemuste hindamise indikaatorid ........................................................... 37 Kasutatud allikad .......................................................................................................................................