DOCSLIB.ORG

Masterarbeit / Master´S Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Masterarbeit / Master´S Thesis MASTERARBEIT / MASTER´S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master´s Thesis „Die Asylie im Münzbild“ verfasst von / submitted by Mag. Victoria Johanna Breitsprecher angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master (MA) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 067 309 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Numismatik und Geldgeschichte degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Szaivert INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1. EINLEITUNG 11 1.1. Aufbau und Struktur der Arbeit 11 1.2. De nummis asylorum - RPC I und II 12 1.2.1. Asylie, Hikesie und Neokorie 12 1.2.2. Das asylietypische Münzbild 18 2. STÄDTEPRÄGUNGEN AUS DEM RPC III 22 2.1. MACEDONIA 23 2.1.1. Stoboi 23 2.1.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Stoboi 23 2.1.1.2. Münzprägung - Stoboi 23 2.2. ACHAIA 25 2.2.1. Argos 25 2.2.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Argos 25 2.2.1.2. Münzprägung - Argos 26 2.2.2. Epidauros 27 2.2.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Epidauros 27 2.2.2.2. Münzprägung - Epidauros 29 2.2.3. Korinth 30 2.2.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Korinth 30 2.2.3.2. Münzprägung - Korinth 32 2.3. ASIA 36 2.3.1. TROAS 36 2.3.1.1. Abydos 36 2.3.1.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Abydos 36 2.3.1.1.2. Münzprägung - Abydos 37 2.3.1.2. Ilion 38 2.3.1.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Ilion 38 2.3.1.2.2. Münzprägung - Ilion 38 2.3.1.3. Pionia 39 2.3.1.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Pionia 39 2.3.1.3.2. Münzprägung - Pionia 39 2.3.2. AIOLIS 41 2.3.2.1. Kyme 41 2.3.2.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Kyme 41 2.3.2.1.2. Münzprägung - Kyme 42 2.3.3. IONIA 43 2.3.3.1. Ephesos 43 2.3.3.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Ephesos 43 2.3.3.1.2. Münzprägung - Ephesos 45 2.3.3.2. Magnesia 48 2.3.3.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Magnesia 48 2.3.3.2.2. Münzprägung - Magnesia 49 2.3.3.3. Milet 51 2.3.3.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Milet 51 2.3.3.3.2. Münzprägung - Milet 54 2.3.4. MYSIA 57 2.3.4.1. Pergamon 57 2.3.4.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Pergamon 57 2.3.4.1.2. Münzprägung - Pergamon 58 2.3.5. LYDIA 63 2.3.5.1. Hierokaisareia 63 2.3.5.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Hierokaisareia 63 2.3.5.1.2. Münzprägung - Hierokaisareia 64 2.3.5.2. Hypaipa 65 2.3.5.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Hypaipa 65 2.3.5.2.2. Münzprägung - Hypaipa 65 2.3.5.3. Maionia 66 2.3.5.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Maionia 66 2.3.5.3.2. Münzprägung - Maionia 66 2.3.5.4. Nakrasa 67 2.3.1.4.1. Historischer Abriss - Nakrasa 67 2.3.1.4.2. Münzprägung - Nakrasa 67 2.3.5.5. Sardeis 69 2.3.1.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Sardeis 69 2.3.1.1.2. Münzprägung - Sardeis 70 2.3.6. CARIA 73 2.3.6.1. Aphrodisias 73 2.3.6.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Aphrodisias 73 2.3.6.1.2. Münzprägung - Aphrodisias 73 2.3.6.2. Herakleia Salbake 74 2.3.6.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Herakleia Salbake 74 2.3.6.2.2. Münzprägung - Herakleia Salbake 74 2.3.7. PHRYGIA 76 2.3.7.1. Aizanoi 76 2.3.7.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Aizanoi 76 2.3.7.1.2. Münzprägung - Aizanoi 77 2.3.7.2. Eumeneia 78 2.3.7.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Eumeneia 78 2.3.7.2.2. Münzprägung - Eumeneia 79 2.3.7.3. Hadrianopolis Sebaste 80 2.3.7.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Hadrianopolis Sebaste 80 2.3.7.3.2. Münzprägung - Hadrianopolis Sebaste 80 2.3.7.4. Laodikeia 81 2.3.7.4.1. Historischer Abriss - Laodikeia 81 2.3.7.4.2. Münzprägung - Laodikeia 81 2.4. BITHYNIA ET PONTUS 84 2.4.1. Amisos 84 2.4.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Amisos 84 2.4.1.2. Münzprägung - Amisos 84 2.4.2. Komana Hierokaisareia 86 2.1.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Komana Hierokaisareia 86 2.1.2.2. Münzprägung - Komana Hierokaisareia 86 2.4.3. Sinope 87 2.4.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Sinope 87 2.4.3.2. Münzprägung - Sinope 88 2.4.4. Prusa 89 2.4.4.1. Historischer Abriss - Prusa 89 2.4.4.2. Münzprägung - Prusa 89 2.5. LYCIA ET PAMPHYLIA 90 2.5.1. Aspendos 90 2.5.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Aspendos 90 2.5.1.2. Münzprägung - Aspendos 90 2.5.2. Attaleia 91 2.5.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Attaleia 91 2.5.2.2. Münzprägung - Attaleia 92 2.5.3. Perge 93 2.5.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Perge 93 2.5.3.2. Münzprägung - Perge 94 2.6. GALATIA - CAPPADOCIA 97 2.6.1. Caesarea 97 2.6.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Caesarea 97 2.6.1.2. Münzprägung - Caesarea 98 2.6.2. Hierapolis Komana 102 2.6.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Hierapolis Komana 102 2.6.2.2. Münzprägung - Hierapolis Komana 102 2.7. CILICIA 104 2.7.1. Philadelpheia 104 2.7.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Philadelpheia 104 2.7.1.2. Münzprägung - Philadelpheia 104 2.7.2. Tarsos 105 2.7.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Tarsos 105 2.7.2.2. Münzprägung - Tarsos 105 2.8. SYRIA 107 2.8.1. Berytos 107 2.8.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Berytos 107 2.8.1.2. Münzprägung - Berytos 108 2.8.2. Seleukeia Pieria 109 2.8.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Seleukeia Pieria 109 2.8.2.2. Münzprägung - Seleukeia Pieria 110 2.9. IUDAEA 116 2.9.1. Aelia Capitolina 116 2.9.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Aelia Capitolina 116 2.9.1.2. Münzprägung - Aelia Capitolina 117 2.9.2. Caesarea Maritima 118 2.9.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Caesarea Maritima 118 2.9.2.2. Münzprägung - Caesarea Maritima 119 2.9.3. Gaba 120 2.9.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Gaba 120 2.9.3.2. Münzprägung - Gaba 120 2.9.4. Gaza 121 2.9.4.1. Historischer Abriss - Gaza 121 2.9.4.2. Münzprägung - Gaza 122 2.9.5. Tiberias Claudiopolis 125 2.9.5.1. Historischer Abriss - Tiberias Claudiopolis 125 2.9.5.2. Münzprägung - Tiberias Claudiopolis 125 2.10. ARABIA 127 2.10.1. Bostra 127 2.10.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Bostra 127 2.10.1.2. Münzprägung - Bostra 128 2.11. AEGYPTUS ET ALEXANDRIA 130 2.11.1. Alexandreia 130 2.11.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Alexandreia 130 2.11.1.2. Münzprägung - Alexandreia 131 2.11.1.2. Prägung von Tempeln mit Pylonen - Alexandreia 164 3. KOINONPRÄGUNGEN AUS DEM RPC III 170 3.1. Koinon von Bithynien 170 3.1.1. Historischer Abriss - Bithynien 170 3.1.2. Münzprägung - Bithynien 172 3.2. Koinon von Galatien 176 3.2.1. Historischer Abriss - Galatien 176 3.2.2. Münzprägung - Galatien 177 3.3. Koinon von Zypern 179 3.3.1. Historischer Abriss - Zypern 179 3.3.2. Münzprägung - Zypern 181 4. CISTOPHORE PRÄGUNGEN AUS DEM RPC III 182 4.1. Historischer Abriss - Cistophoren 182 4.2. Cistophore Prägungen 183 5. PROBLEMANALYSE 187 6. AUSWERTUNG UND STATISTIK FÜR DIE PRÄGUNGEN DES RPC III 189 7. ERGEBNISANALYSE DER PRÄGUNGEN MIT ASYLIETYPISCHEM 195 MÜNZBILD AUS RPC I, II und III 8. FAZIT 197 09. TAFELN 199 10.1. Tafel I 199 10.2. Tafel II 200 10. ANHANG 201 10.1. Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Münzbilder 201 10.2. Abkürzungsverzeichnis der Städte und Städtebünde 201 10.3. Abbildungsverzeichnis 203 10.4. Abbildungsverzeichnis der Tafeln 204 10.4.1. Tafel I 204 10.4.1. Tafel II 205 11. BIBLIOGRAPHIE 206 11.1. Quellen 206 11.2. Sekundärliteratur 211 11.3. Onlineressourcen und Lexika 225 11.4. Kataloge und Ausstellungskataloge 227 12. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 229 13. ABSTRACT 231 φρόντισον καὶ γενοῦ πανδίκως εὐσεβὴς πρόξενος· τὰν φυγάδα μὴ προδῷς, τὰν ἕκαθεν ἐκβολαῖς δυσθέοις ὀρμέναν· Denke nach! Werde du allgerecht-frommer Gastschützer uns! Mich, den Flüchtling, gib nicht preis, mich, die fernher Schmach und Bann ruchlos forttrieb von zu Haus! (Aischylos, Die Schutzflehenden1) 1 Aischyl. Hik. 418-422. 1. EINLEITUNG 1.1. Aufbau und Struktur der Arbeit Ich möchte mit dieser Arbeit zeigen, dass ein asylietypisches Münzbild, insbesondere in der Regierungszeit Nervas bis Hadrians (96–138 n. Chr.), nachgewiesen werden kann. Dazu verwende ich als Grundlage den Online-Katalog des RPC Bn. III2, da dieser bis heute die wohl vollständigste Darstellung aller in Frage kommenden Münzen bietet. Der Grundgedanke meiner Masterarbeit fußt auf meiner im Winter 2012/13 fertiggestellten Diplomarbeit "De nummis asylorum"3, in der ich die Bändes des RPC I4 und II5 auf ein asylietypisches Münzbild untersucht habe und nur einen Ausblick auf die weitere Entwicklung eines asylietypischen Münzbildes nach Domitian vorstellen konnte. Um ein besseres Verständnis für die hier vorliegende Masterarbeit zu bieten, möchte ich den Inhalt der thematisch vorangegangenen Diplomarbeit im Kapitel "1.2. De nummis asylorum" kurz zusammenfassen. Da die gendergerechte Sprache wünschenswert ist, und das bloße Mitmeinen von Frauen im generischen Maskulinum äußerst diskutabel, habe ich in dieser Arbeit zumeist geschlechtsneutral formuliert oder beide Genderformen trotz einer erschwerten Lesbarkeit genannt, da mir die sonst zur Verfügung stehenden neuen Wortschöpfungen (z.B. Binnen-I, Partizipien, Doppelnennungen, Gender*sternchen und Gender_Gap) sprachlich höchst unbefriedigend erscheinen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Addenda Et Corrigenda
    Christian Settipani CONTINUITE GENTILICE ET CONTINUITE FAMILIALE DANS LES FAMILLES SENATORIALES ROMAINES A L’EPOQUE IMPERIALE MYTHE ET REALITE Addenda I - III (juillet 2000- octobre 2002) P & G Prosopographica et Genealogica 2002 ADDENDA I (juillet 2000 - août 2001) Introduction Un an après la publication de mon livre, il apparaît opportun de donner un premier état des compléments et des corrections que l’on peut y apporter1. Je ne dirais qu’un mot des erreurs de forme, bien trop nombreuses hélas, mais qu’il reste toujours possible d’éliminer. J’ai répertorié ici celles que j’ai relevées au hasard des lectures. En revanche, les corrections de fond s’avèrent un mal rédhibitoire. La mise à jour de nouveaux documents (et on verra que plusieurs inscriptions importantes doivent être ajoutées au dossier), la prise en compte de publications qui m’avaient échappées ou simplement une réflexion différente rendront toujours l’œuvre mouvante et inachevée. Il m’a semblé que pour garder au livre son caractère d’actualité il fallait impérativement tenir à jour des addenda. Une publication traditionnelle aurait pour conséquence que ces addenda seraient eux-mêmes rapidement rendus insuffisants voire obsolètes dans un temps très court, à peine publiés sans doute2. La meilleure solution s’impose donc naturellement : une publication en ligne avec une remise à niveau régulière que l’on trouvera, pour l’instant, sur : http://www.linacre.ox.ac.uk/research/prosop/addrome.doc Il est bien entendu que cet état reste provisoire et ne s’assimile pas encore à une publication formelle et que je reste à l’écoute des suggestions, critiques ou corrections que l’on voudra bien me faire, et que j’essaierai d’en tenir compte du mieux possible3.
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Kleinasiatischen Münzkunde Und Geschichte 11
    GEPHYRA 12, 2015, 1-88 Beiträge zur kleinasiatischen Münzkunde und Geschichte 11. Adleromina: Stadt- und Kultgründungen auf Geheiß des Zeus Johannes NOLLÉ «Stadtgründer müssen unbedingt mit der Art und Weise vertraut sein, wie die Dichter Mythen erzählen und von der diese, wenn sie sie dichten, nicht abweichen dürfen. Hingegen dürfen Stadt- gründer auf gar keinen Fall selbst Mythen dichten.»1 Platon Regula Kunkel gewidmet 1. Einführung Platon hat in seinem ‹Staat› von den Stadt- bzw. Staatsgründern gefordert, einen klaren Blick dafür zu haben, dass griechische Dichter genremäßig einer mythischen Weltsicht verpflichtet seien. Von den Gründern eines idealen Staates aber verlangt er, es ihnen nicht nachzutun und sich auf keinen Fall auf den Mythos einzulassen (sondern sich an den Realitäten zu orientieren). Tatsächlich haben die hellenischen Stadtgründer von der archaischen Zeit bis in den Hellenismus, soweit wir das be- urteilen können, sich meist mit wohlüberlegten und klaren Zielsetzungen zu einer Stadt- bzw. ‹Ko- lonie›gründung entschlossen, dann nach rationalen Gesichtspunkten geeignete Plätze für ihre Gründungen ausgewählt und schließlich die Städte gut geplant und klar durchdacht angelegt2 – * Prof. Dr. Johannes Nollé, Kommission für Alte Geschichte und Epigraphik des DAI, Amalienstr. 73b, D- 80799 München ([email protected]). Der Beitrag ist eine Fortsetzung von Gephyra 7, 2010 (2012), 71-126; über einige ausgewählte Aspekte dieser Thematik habe ich auf dem XV. Internationalen Numismatischen Kongress in Taormina im Septem-
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long New.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82720-1 - Philostratus Edited by Ewen Bowie and Jas Elsner Index More information Index Note:c.8 = chapter 8; cc. 1, 2 = chapters 1, 2. Abaris 172 agonothesia 122 ab epistulis graecis 29, 100 Agrippa, M. Vipsanius 118 Abradatas 312 Ajax (son of Telamon) 231,(Locrian)242, 244, Abraham 37, 208 313 Abydos (Memnoneion) 138 Alberti, de pictura 347 Academy 112, 113, 120, 121, 128 Alceidus 71 accuracy 17, 101, 104, 116, 120, 271 Alciatus 349 Achaea, legate of 23 Alcinous 184, 190, 191, 194, 200 Achilles 12, 30, 38, 39, 141, 155, 172, 180, 181, 183, Alciphron 9, 287, 290, 295, 297 184, 192, 193, 197, 210, 222, 224, 227, 228, aleipt¯es (leiptv, see-also ‘trainer’) 262, 264 230–47, 278, 295, 298, 309, 311, 317, 320, Alexander of Macedon 162, 191, 193, 227, 231, 328–30, 332 233, 236, 238, 245 Achilles Tatius 28, 135, 212, 224, 225, Alexander-histories 155 245 Alexander of Hypata 112 Acontius and Cydippe 302 Alexander Polyhistor 162 Acragas 172 Alexander (‘Clay-Plato’) of Seleucia 50, 62, 76, acrobatics 260 77, 80, 88, 98 acropolis, Athenian 21 Alexandria 71, 108, 120, 121, 141, 154, 161, 215, 217 Actaeon 135 Alexis 159, 160 actor 78, 302 allegory 235 adoxography 255 Amazons 35, 215, 235 Aeacidae 236, 245–7 Amenhotep III 136 Aegaleus, Mount 108 Ammianus Marcellinus 167 Aegeae 25 Ammon 239 Aegina 233, 239 Amoebus 71 Aelian 9, 26 Letters 26, 290, 296 varia historia Amphiaraus 312, 313 170, 173 Amphicles 22, 67 Aelianus, Casperius 180, 181 Amphion 43, 241, 315, 317, 329, 333 Aenianes 241, 245 Amymone 316, 328 Aeolus 181, 182, 184, 194, 196, 197 Anaxagoras 169 aerarium militare 34 Andocides 92 Aeschines 30, 67, 88, 92, 304 Andrians 310, 344 Aezani 121 Androclus 118 Africa 29, 198 Andromeda 135, 311 Africanus, Sex.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REACH of the ROMAN EMPIRE in ROUGH CILICIA by HUGHW.ELTON
    THE ECONOMIC FRINGE: THE REACH OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE IN ROUGH CILICIA By HUGHW.ELTON Many discussions of the Roman economy are rather vague about what they mean by 'Roman'. Phrases such as 'Roman Europe' or 'the Roman Empire' often blur two different concepts, that of the cultures of Iron Age Europe and the political institution of the Roman Empire. Cultures in Iron Age Europe varied widely. The Welsh uplands or the Atlas mountains, for example, had an aceramic culture with few public buildings, though were mIed directly by Rome for several centuries. Other regions, not under Roman control, like the regions across the middle Danube, showed higher concentrations of Mediterranean consumer goods and coins than some of these aceramic areas. 1 In Mesopotamia, many societies were urban and literate, not differing in this respect from those in Italy or Greece. Thus, determining what was imperial Roman territory by archaeological criteria alone is very difficult? But these archaeological criteria are important for two reasons. First, they allow us to analyse the cultural and economic changes that occurred in Iron Age Europe between 100 B.C. and A.D. 250. Second, they allow for the possibility of change within Europe that was not caused by the Roman state? Unlike cultures within Iron Age Europe, the Roman Empire was a political structure, imposed by force and dedicated to extracting benefits for the mling elite of the city of Rome.4 As the empire developed and matured, its form changed, but it was never about the mIed, only the rulers. If we accept that the Empire was a political, not an archaeological, structure, it follows that an examination of 'Impact of Empire: Transformation of Economic Life', has to mean an examination of the impact of the Roman imperial state.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Formatlı Tadımlık Için Tıklayınız
    Karialılar Denizcilerden Kent Kuruculara The Carians From Seafarers to City Builders 00_jenerik_onsoz_Karia.indd 1 18.11.2020 10:22 00_jenerik_onsoz_Karia.indd 2 18.11.2020 10:22 Karialılar Denizcilerden Kent Kuruculara The Carians From Seafarers to City Builders Hazırlayanlar | Edited by Olivier C. Henry Ayşe Belgin-Henry 00_jenerik_onsoz_Karia.indd 3 18.11.2020 10:22 Karialılar Denizcilerden Kent Kuruculara The Carians From Seafarers to City Builders Anadolu Uygarlıkları Serisi’nin dokuzuncu kitabıdır. Bu seri Tüpraş - Yapı Kredi Yayınları işbirliği ile hazırlanmıştır. This is the ninth book in the Anatolian Civilizations Series. A co-publication of Tüpraş - Yapı Kredi Culture, Arts and Publishing. Yapı Kredi Yayınları - 5705 ISBN 978-975-08-4876-6 Proje Koordinatörü Project Coordinator Yapı Kredi Müzesi Müdürü Director of Yapı Kredi Museum Nihat Tekdemir Hazırlayanlar Edited by Olivier C. Henry Ayşe Belgin-Henry Editör Editor Nihat Tekdemir Redaksiyon Redaction Derya Önder Çeviriler Translations G. Bike Yazıcıoğlu, İpek Dağlı Dinçer Grafik Tasarım Graphic Design Nahide Dikel, Arzu Yaraş Düzelti Proofreading Filiz Özkan, Merete Çakmak Baskı Print Ofset Yapımevi Çağlayan Mah. Şair Sk. No: 4 Kağıthane - İstanbul Telefon: (0 212) 295 86 01 • www.ofset.com Sertifika No: 45354 1. baskı: İstanbul, Kasım 2020 1st printing: Istanbul, November 2020 © Ya p› Kre di Kül tür Sa nat Ya y›n c› l›k Ti ca ret ve Sa na yi A.Ş. 2020 Sertifika No Certificate No 44719 Bütün yayın hakları saklıdır. Kaynak gösterilerek tanıtım için yapılacak kısa alıntılar dışında yayıncının yazılı izni olmaksızın hiçbir yolla çoğaltılamaz. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1999 Season
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 1999 The Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1999 Season Nicholas K. Rauh LuAnn Wandsnider Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1999 Season Nicholas K. Rauh, Purdue University LuAnn Wandsnider, University of Nebraska at Lincoln The fourth season of the Rough Cilicia Archaeological survey project was conducted in August 1999.1 Figure 1: 1999 Rough Cilicia Survey Team: front row: LuAnn Wandsnider, Matt Dillon, Ali Bay; second row: Rhys Townsend, Betul Sahin, Molly Boekhe; Michael Hoff; Max Black; back row: Jason DeBlock, Nick Rauh, Matt Evans Our research during the 1999 season was supported by grants from the American Research Institute in Turkey, Purdue University, and the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. Electron1c measuring equipment was donated by Hickerson Instruments Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana. To conduct our work we received authorization from the Director of the Turkish General Directorate of Monuments and Museums, and as always we were greatly assisted by Dr. Ismail Karamut, Director of the Alanya Archaeological Museum. Our service representative, Berrin Taymaz, researcher at the Alanya Archaeological Museum 1 This report was transformed from an html format into a PDF by Stanislav Pejša, the data curator at PURR.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Power: Matthew, Paul, and the Anthropology of Law
    Law and Power: Matthew, Paul, and the Anthropology of Law by David A. Kaden A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto © Copyright by David A. Kaden 2014 Law and Power: Matthew, Paul, and the Anthropology of Law David A. Kaden Doctor of Philosophy Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines the relationship between legal discourse and the exercise of power in the Gospel of Matthew and the letters of Paul. Drawing from Michel Foucault’s understanding of power, I argue that relations of power are instrumental in forming law as an object of discourse in these two sets of texts. This approach differs from the current approaches to studying law in Matthew and Paul in that it raises the question of why law emerges as an object of discourse. Previous studies have, conversely, tended to focus on what the two writers’ views of law are and where these views situate them vis-à-vis their contemporaries in first century C.E. Judaism. The main problem with this approach is that the evidence in Matthew and Paul is inconclusive regarding whether the two writers are inside or outside of Judaism; and scholarship in both fields has reached a stalemate over this issue. By raising a more fundamental question—why law?—my dissertation invites an analysis of law that moves beyond the Jewish/Christian cultural context, and probes the issue of why law emerges as an object in a variety of cultural settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • The Spread of Coins in the Hellenistic World
    The Spread of Coins in the Hellenistic World Andrew Meadows Although coinage was first ‘invented’ in the archaic Greek period, and spread to a sig- nificant part of the Mediterranean world during the classical period, it remained a mar- ginal element within the economy. At very few cities or mints were coins produced regularly, and the issues of a vast majority of mints were sporadic, small and of coins ill- suited to daily transactions.1 Moreover there existed in the nature of early coinage inher- ent impediments to international use. Thus, while coinage can be said to be a financial innovation of the archaic and classical Greek world, it did not radically change eco- nomic behaviour. Significant changes in the nature and scale of coinage occurred only in the wake of Alexander’s world conquest, during the Hellenistic period. The Hellenistic period runs, as usually defined, from the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC to the Battle of Actium by which Roman superiority over the Greek world was finally established on 2nd September 31 BC. The period is defined by the world conquest of Alexander the Great, and the consequences of the division of his empire upon his death. The name ‘Hellenistic’ derives from the German term for the period, coined by J.G. Droysen in the 1830s in his Geschichte des Hellenismus (First edition, Hamburg 1836–1843). For Droysen, who had previously written a seminal study of Alexander the Great, the period of Hellenismus, was characterised by the Hellenisation of the world that Alexander had conquered. This world had largely been encompassed by the Achaemenid Persian Empire, but had comprised many different cultures in Asia Minor, the Near East, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Iran and beyond.2 1 On scale, see further below, section “Spread and Scale”.
    [Show full text]
  • (1St Century BC). Obv: Celticized Head Left
    1 WESTERN EUROPE. Gaul. Tolosates. Drachm (1st century BC). Obv: Celticized head left. Rev: Cross with pellet at center and pellet-in-crescent in each angle. LT 2986. Condition: Very fine. Weight: 3.11 g. Diameter: 15 mm. Starting price: 40 EUR Estimate: 50 EUR 2 CENTRAL EUROPE. Boii. Hemidrachm (2nd-1st centuries BC). Obv: Head left. Rev: Horse prancing right; star above. Dembski 745-46. Condition: Near very fine. Weight: 2.06 g. Diameter: 13 mm. Starting price: 160 EUR Estimate: 200 EUR 3 EASTERN EUROPE. Noricum (1st century BC). Obol. Obv: Stylized head left [degraded to irregular bulge]. Rev: Athena Alkis right. Cf. Obolos 5, lot 23; cf. Numismatik Naumann 70, lot 20. Condition: Very fine. Weight: 0.94 g. Diameter: 9 mm. Starting price: 40 EUR Estimate: 50 EUR 4 EASTERN EUROPE. Imitations of Philip II of Macedon (2nd-1st centuries BC). Tetradrachm. Obv: Laureate head of Zeus right. Rev: ΦΙΛΙΠΠOY. Youth on horse right, holding palm frond. Controls: Below horse, Λ above torch; dolphin below raised foreleg. Cf. Lanz 355-6; cf. OTA 10/2. Condition: Very fine. Weight: 12.80 g. Diameter: 24 mm. Starting price: 200 EUR Estimate: 250 EUR 5 EASTERN EUROPE. Imitations of Philip II of Macedon (2nd-1st centuries BC). Tetradrachm. "Mit Rad-Kontermarke" type. Obv: Stylized laureate head of Zeus right. Rev: IIII. Stylized horse and rider prancing left. Lanz 394. Condition: Very fine. Weight: 12.91 g. Diameter: 24 mm. Starting price: 200 EUR Estimate: 250 EUR 6 EASTERN EUROPE. Imitations of Philip II of Macedon (2nd-1st centuries BC).
    [Show full text]
  • Aydın Arkeoloji Müzesi'nden Bir Grup Roma İmparatorluk Dönemi Gümüş
    Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Sonbahar Autumn 2020, Sayı Number 26, 417-439 DOI:10.9775/kausbed.2020.023 Gönderim Tarihi: 23.03.2020 Kabul Tarihi: 04.10.2020 AYDIN ARKEOLOJİ MÜZESİ’NDEN BİR GRUP ROMA İMPARATORLUK DÖNEMİ GÜMÜŞ SİKKESİ1 A Group of Roman Imperial Silver Coins in the Aydın Archeological Museum Mehmet Kayhan MURAT Arş. Gör. Kafkas Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000–0001–5314–6108 Çalışmanın Türü: Araştırma Öz Tarih boyunca birçok medeniyete ev sahipliği yapmış Anadolu’nun zenginliği ülkemiz müzelerine de yansımıştır. Aydın Arkeoloji Müzesi içerisinde bulundurduğu arkeolojik eser sayısında müzelerimiz arasında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Zengin bir sikke envanterine sahip olan müzenin koleksiyonunda Klasik, Hellenistik, Roma, Bizans ve İslami dönemlere ait yaklaşık 50.000 sikke bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Aydın Arkeoloji Müzesine satın alma yoluyla kazandırılmış bir grup Roma İmparatorluk dönemi gümüş sikkesi ele alınmıştır. 43 adet gümüş sikke 18 farklı imparatorun iktidar dönemine tarihlenmektedir. Sikkelerin en erken tarihlisi Domitianus (MS 81–96) en geçi ise I. Valerianus (MS 253–260) döneminde darp edilmiştir. İmparator III. Gordianus (MS 238–244) 7 adet sikkeyle en fazla sikkeye sahip olan imparatordur. Tamamı gümüşten basılan sikkeler Roma İmparatorluk döneminin ekonomik olarak en güçlü olduğu dönem hakkında önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Roma, İmparatorluk Sikkeleri, Gümüş, Aydın Abstract With its prosperity Anatolia, which has hosted many civilizations throughout history, has been reflected in the museums in Turkey. Aydın Archeological Museum takes an important place among the museums in Turkey in the number of archaeological artifacts that it contains.
    [Show full text]