DOCSLIB.ORG

Disease Is Not a Metaphor 1X

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disease Is Not a Metaphor 1X Disease Is Not A Metaphor by Cyree Jarelle Johnson Disease is not a metaphor for some crude and unnamed other. Disease is not capitalism, nor is it communism. Disease is not anarchy, nor is it the threat of anarchy. Except for when the body is chaotic and unknowable. Disease is not a virus in the system. Disease is not the body, not the whole, but a part. Disease is not a test from god. Disease is not a fiery furnace, a wall to climb over, a home to be lifted out of by rope. Disease is not a battle to be won or lost in death. Disease is not a metaphor. Disease is not hyperbole. Disease is neither metonym nor synonym. Disease is a condition of the body. Disease is a visitor. Disease is a backseat driver who climbs up front and takes the wheel. Illness is not a filigreed way to speak about things unpleasant and undesired, no matter how comfortable you may be with thinking of it in that way. You were not “crippled” by debts, nor “paralyzed” by fear, nor was your Thursday evening movie “lame”. You are not “blind” to the reality of the situation, nor “deaf” to the concerns of a close friend. You were re-entrenching able-bodied supremacy in language though, is there a specialized insult for that, taken from the lexicon of sorrow heaped upon people who are not yourself? No, there are not more important things to think about than words, because the things that you say are the substance of your thoughts, which become the things that you do and the biases you keep close to your chest. Neither disease, nor illness, nor disability is a convenient way to transmit your point into the bodies of those who would not listen otherwise. Disease is so rarely convenient. By invoking disease you have likely hit the point in their brains that monitors pity, fear, and disgust. If you are talking to me, it is the sector that should learn to better control rage. Disease is not for you to take on and cast off and diagnose yourself anew each morning. Disease is not for you to diagnose in the bodies of others, based on your novice opinion and ableist vision. Disease is not erased by the clever sidestep of euphemism. You cannot close your eyes and blink it away in hopes that we will die before you open them up again. You may utter the name of the disease loudly, I do not think it offensive. The body is not an apology for the disease. The body is not something to be looked at with eyes cast down and weeping. The body is not something to be viewed with the smug sense of knowing what health is. The body is not an apology for the disease. The body is not a manifestation of corporeal weakness and lack to be filled up by Jesus or God or the holy spirit. The body will not untwist itself, anti-virus itself, or cover itself up no matter how many prayer circles surround it, or altar calls it kneels before. The body is not something to feel sorry for because the body is not sorry. The body may be twisted and sly, but the body is not an apology. The body is not a mistake. The body is not a quirk. Not something to be aborted in utero because of preemptive pity and shame that you could produce such a body. The body is not something to be tested out of existence, or prepared for with good breeding. The body is not something to be quarantined in sanitariums and put under the defacto house arrest of disgust. The body should not be killed with medication and medical middle managers who know best while no one cares that you are dying. The body is not something to be fought against or beaten in a race against oneself. The body is a beating, spreading thing, moving and touching even at rest. And the body is not miraculous or brave, even though it does so many things you think it shouldn’t be able to. And the body is not just like yours even though there are overlaps in desire and function. Sameness is not a prerequisite for solidarity. And you should care about it even if you have made conscious attempts to ignore our bodies, to look away, to avoid hospitals and the smell of home care. And you shouldn’t need an apology because the body is not wrong. Looking Back but Moving Forwar<l / 99 Chapter 6 marginalized and other people to both benefit from that marginalization and jnstify it, becanse the rest of ns are inferior. Lastly, acceSSibility cannot be addressed universally; rather it mustbe approached holistically. While the medical model presents disability as falling somewhere on a Looking Back but Moving Forward. spectrum between full health and the absence ofit, the radical model posits that, to borrow Foucault's (1969) concept, disability falls somewhere in a The Radieal Disability Model constellation. Like the constellations in the sky, disability is in constant flux and appears different depending on the positioning ofthe onlooker. This model rejects the social model's distinction betweenimpairmentand None ofthe models discussed so far have adequately addressed both disablism disability. To review: "impairment" is defined bythe social modelas functional and disabled minds and hodies; rather, theyfocus either onthe oppression we limitations and "disability" as the oppression "imposed on top ofour impair- experience (social model) or on what the models define as our flawed bod- ments" (UPIAS in Oliver 1996: 33). The radical model ofdisability rejects the ies and/or minds (eugenic, medical and charity models). This final chapter notionthatimpairmentis a biological reality. The radical modelalso posits that discusses the radical model of disability, my proposal for bringing disability impairment and disability can necessarily be distinguished from each other. politics into a newwave. This framework, while based on the workofa number This model is not the social model ofimpairment - while the model has a of disabled activists and scholars (notably Clare, 1999; Davis, 1995,2002; strongfocus onthe social construction ofimpainnent it rejects the dichotomies Moore, 2002; Erickson, 2007; Epstein, 2009) as well as feminist, anti-racist, created by the social model. anti-capitalist and postmoderntheory, is relativelynew. Developedin organiz- In some times, places or cultures, havingvisions is viewed as wholly nega¥ ing meetings and coffee shops in Toronto, it is myproposal for howwe should tive, requiring the individual to undergo medical intervention, confinement, move disabled people's movements forward and how anyone concerned with medication and!orforced electric shocks to the head. Inothertimes, places or social justice should conceptualize disability.' It is also a call to action, for dis- cultures, it is seen as a gift. Similarly, deafuess is understood to be a disability abled people and non-disabled people alike, to organize inclusively for social bythe medical model but for some people this has been far from the case. For justice and radical access. instance, in Martha's Vineyard around the turn ofthe last century"everyone ... The radical model defines disability as a social construction used as an spoke sign language;' accordingto Gale Huntington, wholived there at the time. oppressive tool to penalize and stigmatize those ofus who deviate from the The townspeople "didn't think anything about [Deafpeople], they were just (arbitrary) norm. Disabled people are not problems; we are diverse and offer like everyone else" (in Groce 1985: 2).Deafness was perceivedverydifferently important understandings ofthe world that should be celebrated rather than and not as a disability in the way that it is in a communitywhere most hearing marginalized. people are unable to communicate with Deafpeople. What is considered a There are four key concepts in the radical model. Firstly, disability is not disability depends on the context. separate from other forms of oppression; rather, it is interlocked with and overlaps them. Secondly, what is considered normal is arbitrary and requires Intersedionality deconstruction. Up until this point, all ofthe models ofdisabilityhave failed to A foundational component ofthe radical model is the idea ofintersectional- challenge the supremacyofthe norm. Margrit ShildrickandJanet Price (1998: ity: addreSSing multiple oppressions together and in conjunction with each 236) havewritten, "A more radicalpolitics ofdisability, then, would disruptthe other. The word "radical" is derived from the Latin, meaning "havingroots:' A norms ofdis/abled identity... by exposing the failure ofthose norms to ever conceptualization ofdisabilitythat did notinclude, atits base, the acknowledg- fully and finally containa definitive standard:'Thirdly, thedisabilitylabel is used ment ofand engagement with tbe interlocutory nature ofoppressions could to marginalize specific types ofpepple in orderto obtain and maintain power; not be a radical model. the classification ofdisabled is a pplitical determination, not a biological one. Within disability theory, intersectionality is often ignored. For instance, Disability is not about whether or not something is "wrong" with someone; disability studies have been called "white disability studies" (Bell 2010: 374), it is about the classification of disability, which allows certain people to be and the exclusion ofwomeninthat discipline has alreadybeen documented. Eli 100 I Disability Politics and Theory Looking Baek but Moving Forward / 101 Clare writes further on the lack ofintersectionalityin radical disahility circles: This is the case for many people with more than one marginality, yet disabled organizers and academics in the field ofdisability studies negate our complex Unfortunately, not manydisabilityornondisabledprogressive groups identities. When disabled people are "run over" because ouridentities are omit- engage in multi-issue thinking and organizing that deeply embeds ted, it is no accident. These erasures occur for a number ofreasons: prejudice, disabilitypolitics into an agenda thatincludes race, class, gendlii'and ignorance and/oran attempt to distance a group from others in order to better sexuality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rhodes Fallen: Student Activism in Post-Apartheid South Africa
    History in the Making Volume 10 Article 11 January 2017 Rhodes Fallen: Student Activism in Post-Apartheid South Africa Amanda Castro CSUSB Angela Tate CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the African History Commons Recommended Citation Castro, Amanda and Tate, Angela (2017) "Rhodes Fallen: Student Activism in Post-Apartheid South Africa," History in the Making: Vol. 10 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol10/iss1/11 This History in the Making is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. History in the Making Rhodes Fallen: Student Activism in Post-Apartheid South Africa By Amanda Castro and Angela Tate The Cecil Rhodes statue as a contested space. Photo courtesy of BBC News.1 In early March of 2015, the steely gaze of Cecil Rhodes—ardent imperialist, founder of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe and Zambia), and former Prime Minister of the Cape Colony—surveyed the campus of the University of Cape Town (UCT) through a splatter of feces. It had been collected by student Chumani Maxwele from “one of the portable toilets that dot the often turbulent, crowded townships on the windswept plains outside Cape Town.”2 Maxwele’s actions sparked a campus-wide conversation that spread to other campuses in South Africa. They also joined the global conversations about Black Lives Matter; the demands in the United States to remove Confederate flags and commemorations to Confederate heroes, and the names of racists (including President 1 Andrew Harding, “Cecil Rhodes Monument: A Necessary Anger?,” BBC News, April 11, 2015, accessed March 3, 2016, http://www.bbc.com/news/ world-africa-32248605.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for People with Multiple Disabilities : an Interdisciplinary Guide for Caregivers Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    CARING FOR PEOPLE WITH MULTIPLE DISABILITIES : AN INTERDISCIPLINARY GUIDE FOR CAREGIVERS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Cindy French | 145 pages | 29 Mar 1995 | Elsevier Health Sciences | 9780761647058 | English | San Antonio, United States Caring for People with Multiple Disabilities : An Interdisciplinary Guide for Caregivers PDF Book She earned her Ph. Companionship is key to a trusted relationship with our caregivers. Now we get to reconnect a few times a month. Depending on the covered benefits and reimbursement policies of State Medicaid programs, including those provided through waivers, other services may be available to some patients. She later joined the Office of the Center Director as a senior advisor leading and supporting various strategic initiatives such as Clinical Trials Innovation, Real World Evidence, and efforts to improve diversity and inclusion in medical product development. Caregivers in the focus groups consistently reported they did not have time to take care of their own health. We constructed a composite measure of self-care or mobility disability that reflects whether the older adult received help in the prior month with 1 or more self-care eg, eating, dressing, bathing, and toileting or mobility eg, getting outside, getting around inside, and getting out of bed activities. Parents and caregivers should aim to have children be as independent as possible. Care Services. Facilitator Feedback Facilitators agreed that the pilot program went smoothly overall. Training and Education in Professional Psychology , 1 2 , — doi Additionally, the program provides advocacy for residents transitioning from nursing homes back to the community through Money Follows the Person. Compensation for the extra effort involved in caring for patients with complex needs is clearly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Archiving Possibilities with the Victorian Freak Show a Dissertat
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE “Freaking” the Archive: Archiving Possibilities With the Victorian Freak Show A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English by Ann McKenzie Garascia September 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Joseph Childers, Co-Chairperson Dr. Susan Zieger, Co-Chairperson Dr. Robb Hernández Copyright by Ann McKenzie Garascia 2017 The Dissertation of Ann McKenzie Garascia is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has received funding through University of California Riverside’s Dissertation Year Fellowship and the University of California’s Humanities Research Institute’s Dissertation Support Grant. Thank you to the following collections for use of their materials: the Wellcome Library (University College London), Special Collections and University Archives (University of California, Riverside), James C. Hormel LGBTQIA Center (San Francisco Public Library), National Portrait Gallery (London), Houghton Library (Harvard College Library), Montana Historical Society, and Evanion Collection (the British Library.) Thank you to all the members of my dissertation committee for your willingness to work on a project that initially described itself “freakish.” Dr. Hernández, thanks for your energy and sharp critical eye—and for working with a Victorianist! Dr. Zieger, thanks for your keen intellect, unflappable demeanor, and ready support every step of the process. Not least, thanks to my chair, Dr. Childers, for always pushing me to think and write creatively; if it weren’t for you and your Dickens seminar, this dissertation probably wouldn’t exist. Lastly, thank you to Bartola and Maximo, Flora and Martinus, Lalloo and Lala, and Eugen for being demanding and lively subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Worlds and the Victorian Freak Show
    “Skinless Wonders”: Body Worlds and the Victorian Freak Show Nadja Durbach Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Volume 69, Number 1, January 2014, pp. 38-67 (Article) Published by Oxford University Press For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jhm/summary/v069/69.1.durbach.html Access provided by Middlebury College (28 Jul 2014 12:06 GMT) “Skinless Wonders”: Body Worlds and the Victorian Freak Show NADJA DURBACH Department of History, University of Utah, Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building, 215 South Central Campus Drive, Room 310, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. In 2002, Gunther von Hagens’s display of plastinated corpses opened in London. Although the public was fascinated by Body Worlds, the media largely castigated the exhibition by dismissing it as a resuscitated Victorian freak show. By using the freak show analogy, the British press expressed their moral objection to this type of bodily display. But Body Worlds and nineteenth-century displays of human anomalies were linked in more complex and telling ways as both attempted to be simultaneously entertaining and educational. This essay argues that these forms of corpo- real exhibitionism are both examples of the dynamic relationship between the popular and professional cultures of the body that we often errone- ously think of as separate and discrete. By reading Body Worlds against the Victorian freak show, I seek to generate a fuller understanding of the his- torical and enduring relationship between exhibitionary culture and the discourses of science, and thus to argue that the scientific and the spectac- ular have been, and clearly continue to be, symbiotic modes of generating bodily knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Nothing About Us Without Us Exhibition Large Print Text 18Pt
    Nothing About Us Without Us Exhibition Large Print Text 18pt 1 Contents Introduction…………………………………………….4 Timeline………………………………………………...5 Banners……………………………………………….22 Photographs and Posters………………………......24 Placards by Jo Ann Taylor.........…………………...27 T-shirt and Other Campaign Materials Case……...28 Leaflets, Badges and Campaign Materials Case…29 Cased T-Shirts………………………………………. 35 Protest Placards…………………………………….. 36 The Autistic Rights Movement…………………….. 37 No Excuses…………………………………………. 46 Pure Art Studio……………………………………… 48 One Voice…………………………………………… 50 Quiet Riot……………………………………………. 51 Music………………………………………………… 66 2 Nothing About Us Without Us Playlist……………. 67 Interviews……………………………………………. 68 3 Introduction panel This exhibition is the second stage in a long-term project that looks at the representation of disabled people. The museum is working with groups, campaigners and individuals to capture their stories and re-examine how the history of disabled people’s activism is presented. We encourage you to let us know if you have any comments, objects or stories you would like to share to help to continue to tell this story. If you are interested in sharing your object or story as part of this project, please speak to a member of staff or contact [email protected] 4 Timeline The timeline on the wall is split into five sections: Early Days, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s. Each section has an introductory label followed by photographs and labels with further information. Beneath the timeline is a shelf with pencils and pieces of card on it that visitors can use to write their own additions to the timeline and leave them on the shelf for other visitors to see. The introduction to the timeline is as follows: Is anything missing? Add to the timeline using the cards and shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    COPAS—Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies 18.2 (2017) Scars for Life(s) Jessica Suzanne Stokes ABSTRACT: This essay considers the relationship between performance, disability, and the ephemera of wounding experiences by using bodily scars as method for multi-temporal and multi-spatial reflection. Thinking through the “Freak Show” season of the television series American Horror Story, this essay locates coalitional potential in scars as they offer sites from which to create new stories of the past. KEYWORDS: Disability; Scar; Performance; Culture Operation Ephemera Some people take first day of school pictures to document the passage of time. Instead, I have x-rays, photos of blue hairnets that barely cover my head, and more photos of my feet right after the cast is sawed away, right before the stitches or staples come out because the surgeries I had were my father’s surgeries, and my brother’s surgeries and… These photos don’t document time linearly. They aren’t displayed in an album in a particular order. They all sit in one shoe box. Each merges with the next: purple cast fragments, screws lodged in bone, staples in a row, beforeafter while afterbefore, white walls, blue hairnets, hospital blankets, IV drips, purple cast fragments. The scars are reopened by new operations. I’ve lost track of the number of surgeries. I certainly don’t remember the dates (see figure 1). Figure 1. Jessica Stokes’ Foot X-ray, Grand Rapids. Figure 2. Matthew Stokes’ Foot X-ray, Grand Personal x-ray of author. Date unknown. Rapids. Courtesy of owner. Date unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Advocacy Priorities Guide
    Legislative & Advocacy Priorities Guide Summer 2018 A Message from the Executive Director I am pleased to announce the release of the summer edition of the National Council on Independent Living’s 2018 Policy Priorities. This publication will introduce you to a sample of the many legislative issues NCIL is currently pursuing in order to secure full inclusion and equality for people with disabilities in our great nation. I would like to draw particular attention to issues surrounding Independent Living funding. CILs and their statewide counterparts are the only organizations directly working to address the issues outlined in this publication. They use shoe-string budgets to successfully advocate for individuals with disabilities facing discrimination while fighting to win an even playing field and ensure the civil and human rights of all Americans. I am very proud of our community’s hard work to bring these issues to Congress. Together we will see the passage of our legislative priorities, the restoration of our civil rights, and a world in which people with disabilities are truly valued equally and participate fully. Kelly Buckland Table of Contents The Independent Living Program → Pages 4 - 6 Healthcare and Long-Term Services and Supports → Pages 6 - 11 Disability Integration Act Reform Medicaid, Don’t Gut It! Independent Living and Medicaid Healthcare Money Follows the Person Durable Medical Equipment (DME) and Complex Rehabilitation Technology (CRT) Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Disability in Healthcare Opioids and Chronic Pain Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) Assisted Suicide → Pages 11 - 14 House Concurrent Resolution 80 Against Assisted Suicide Laws Civil Rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act → Pages 14 - 15 ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017: H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • BARRIERS and OPPORTUNITIES for DOCTORS with DISABILITIES Alicia Ouellette*
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\13-3\NVJ302.txt unknown Seq: 1 12-JUN-13 12:56 PATIENTS TO PEERS: BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DOCTORS WITH DISABILITIES Alicia Ouellette* In May 2012, the National Disability Rights Network issued a report enti- tled Devaluing People with Disabilities: Medical Procedures That Violate Civil Rights.1 The report is an indictment of a health care system that fails to recog- nize the value of life with disability, despite the importance of the health care system in the lives of people with disabilities. The report describes conversa- tions between doctors and persons with disabilities and their families in which people with disabilities are “viewed as having little value as they are. They are considered not as fully human, endowed with inalienable rights of liberty, pri- vacy and the right to be left alone—solely because they were born with a disa- bility.”2 The National Disability Rights Network is hardly the first group or individual to criticize American medicine for its treatment of persons with disa- bilities.3 Disability scholars have documented a long history of medical mis- treatment of and insensitivity toward people with disabilities at the hands of the medical establishment,4 and individuals with disabilities have authored compel- * Professor of Law and Associate Dean, Albany Law School. Many thanks to Philip Zazove, Christopher Moreland, Demetrius Moutsiakis, and the members of the Drexel Law Faculty workshop for their thoughtful feedback on this paper. Thanks also to Sevil Nuredinoski for her research assistance. 1 DAVID CARLSON, CINDY SMITH & NACHAMA WILKER, DEVALUING PEOPLE WITH DISABILI- TIES: MEDICAL PROCEDURES THAT VIOLATE CIVIL RIGHTS (2012), available at http://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploitative to Favorable, Freak to Ordinary: The
    EXPLOITATIVE TO FAVORABLE, FREAK TO ORDINARY: THE EVOLUTION OF DISABILITY REPRESENTATION IN FILM By Julia E. Thompson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Studies Division of Ohio Dominican University Columbus, Ohio in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH DECEMBER 2015 iii CONTENTS CERTIFICATION PAGE ………………………………………………………………… ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………. iv CHAPTER 1: A HISTORY OF DISABILITY …………………………………………… 1 CHAPTER 2: FREAK SHOWS AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES …………………….. 6 CHAPTER 3: DIFFERENT STIGMA: SENSORY DISABILITY ON FILM …………… 15 CHAPTER 4: REGRESSIVE VERSUS PROGRESSIVE DEPICTION ………………… 27 WORKS CITED ………………………………………………………………………….. 35 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the faculty of the Master of Arts graduate program at Ohio Dominican University. You have opened my mind to the infinite rewards of studying literature, poetry, philosophy, and film. Specifically, I want to thank Dr. Ann Hall for her guidance and encouragement from the very beginning of my journey in the graduate program all the way through to the completion of this thesis. Your support and faith in my abilities allowed me to reach my goal. Also, I would like to thank Dr. Martin Brick for his support and review. My success in the graduate program would not have been possible without the love, support, and unwavering encouragement of my husband, Eric. Thank you for assuming even more of the responsibilities for our children and our home while I worked through the program and this thesis. Thank you also to my children, Celeste and Sawyer, who have been so very patient with me. I hope that my excitement for education influences your own outlook.
    [Show full text]
  • How the American Freak Show and Its Literature Redefine the Archive
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--English English 2020 Freakish Taxonomies: How The American Freak Show And Its Literature Redefine The Archive Megan E. Pillow University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-2871 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2020.255 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Pillow, Megan E., "Freakish Taxonomies: How The American Freak Show And Its Literature Redefine The Archive" (2020). Theses and Dissertations--English. 116. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/english_etds/116 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the English at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--English by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • National Disability Policy: a Progress Report, November 1, 1997-October 31, 1998
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 428 496 EC 307 100 TITLE National Disability Policy: A Progress Report, November 1, 1997-October 31, 1998. INSTITUTION National Council on Disability, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-02-16 NOTE 66p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004-1107; Tel: 202-272-2004; TTY: 202-272-2074; Fax: 202-272-2022; Web site: http://www.ncd.gov PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adults; Assistive Devices (for Disabled); Children; Civil Rights Legislation; *Disabilities; Educational Legislation; Educational Policy; Elementary Secondary Education; Employment; *Federal Legislation; *Government Role; Health Services; Housing; Program Effectiveness; Research Needs; *Social Integration; Transportation IDENTIFIERS *Americans with Disabilities Act 1990; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ABSTRACT This progress report reviews federal policy activities toward the inclusion, empowerment, and independence of people with disabilities consistent with the vision of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The report covers the period of November 1, 1997, through October 31, 1998. It notes progress where it has occurred and makes further recommendations in the following areas:(1) disability research;(2) civil rights;(3) education;(4) health care;(5) long-term services and supports; (6) immigrants, and racial and ethnic minorities with disabilities;(7) Social Security work incentives and Social Security solvency;(8) employment;
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 2014 NY.Pmd
    PAGE 1 MARCH 2014-NEWABLE NEWSPAPER YORK PAGE VOLUME 19 NUMBER 10 MARCH 2014 AWARD-WINNING New York THE NEWSPAPER POSITIVELY FOR, BY & ABOUT THE DISABLED READY IN THE BRONX IN THIS ISSUE Education, Kids Play and Improve Skills Schools, Camps And Recreation PAGES 7, 8, 9 CRPD 141 Countries Ratify But No U.S. Movement PAGE 2 Obama Includes PWD Minimum Wage Raised By Executive Order PAGE 3 EEOC Releases Data 2013 Highest $$ Recovery In Agency History PAGE 5 Snow, Rain, Slush Who Is Responsible For Clean-Up? PAGE 5 MTA Cuts Ribbon Dyckman #1 Station Accessible At Last PAGE 10 Sports Paralympics, Skiing And Snowboarding PAGE 11 About 100 preschoolers in the Readiness Program hockey, winter bowling, luge, ice-skating. They also VISIT at New York Institute for Special Education (NYISE), had snowball fights with crumbled paper. ABLE'S in the Bronx, recently participated in their annual Win- All activities were designed to improve gross mo- WEBSITE ter Olympics. Developmentally-delayed three- to five- tor skills such as coordination, balance, strength year-olds played Olympics-inspired games such as and agility. WWW. ABLENEWS.COM N.Y. ABLE NEWSPAPER P.O. BOX 395, OLD BETHPAGE, NY 11804 TO THE 516 939-2253 LETTERS EDITOR FAX 516 939-0540 www.ablenews.com Hi Everyone, ing home) and might have noth- siblings. Any questions please Thanks to all who have signed ing better to do, could you all contact me. our petition to save home care please mass-mail our petition Thank you. workers and the people with dis- with old-fashioned email and Philip Bennett abilities we assist.
    [Show full text]