How the American Freak Show and Its Literature Redefine the Archive
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--English English 2020 Freakish Taxonomies: How The American Freak Show And Its Literature Redefine The Archive Megan E. Pillow University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-2871 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2020.255 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Pillow, Megan E., "Freakish Taxonomies: How The American Freak Show And Its Literature Redefine The Archive" (2020). Theses and Dissertations--English. 116. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/english_etds/116 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the English at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--English by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of my work. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of my work. I understand that I am free to register the copyright to my work. REVIEW, APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE The document mentioned above has been reviewed and accepted by the student’s advisor, on behalf of the advisory committee, and by the Director of Graduate Studies (DGS), on behalf of the program; we verify that this is the final, approved version of the student’s thesis including all changes required by the advisory committee. The undersigned agree to abide by the statements above. Megan E. Pillow, Student Dr. Marion Rust, Major Professor Dr. Michael Trask, Director of Graduate Studies FREAKISH TAXONOMIES: HOW THE AMERICAN FREAK SHOW AND ITS LITERATURE REDEFINE THE ARCHIVE ________________________________________ DISSERTATION ________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Megan E. Pillow Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Marion Rust, Professor of English Lexington, Kentucky 2020 Copyright © Megan E. Pillow 2020 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-2871 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION FREAKISH TAXONOMIES: HOW THE AMERICAN FREAK SHOW AND ITS LITERATURE REDEFINE THE ARCHIVE The American freak show, which dominated the entertainment landscape from 1840 to 1940, is considered by some disability studies scholars to be off limits for critical engagement. In Freakish Taxonomies: How the American Freak Show and its Literature Redefine the Archive, I argue that by casting the freak show solely as an exploitative institution, we overlook its capacity to serve as a model for reinterpreting the relationship between literary studies and the archive. By recognizing the freak show not just as an exploitative institution but also as a dynamic archive of marginalized lives—one that utilizes an imperfect, often deceptive taxonomy that makes its flaws wholly visible rather than hiding them—we can explore the freak show's ability to serve as an analytical model for literary studies. In my study, I argue that the freak show and its promotional texts and tools function as a model for close reading not the order, but the gaps and flaws—what I call “freakish taxonomies” —in literature produced during the freak show’s heyday. By applying this model of analysis to texts such as Moby-Dick, The Country of the Pointed Firs, Puddn'head Wilson and Those Extraordinary Twins, Of One Blood, and Quicksand, many of which have been classified as failed or flawed by critics, I argue that we can better identify the complex stories of marginalized lives that have sometimes been overlooked in these texts while simultaneously challenging disability studies’ critical contention that novels are “part of a project of middle class hegemony” (Davis 41). As a result of this process of close reading and narrative identification, we can also redefine our understanding of the archive by moving away from the repository model and towards a “liberatory” archive which is more inclusive of the histories of marginalized populations and aligns with the more holistic turns of disability studies and archival studies. KEYWORDS: American Literature, Nineteenth-century literature, Twentieth-century literature, Disability studies, Archival studies Megan E. Pillow (Name of Student) May 8, 2020 Date FREAKISH TAXONOMIES: HOW THE AMERICAN FREAK SHOW AND ITS LITERATURE REDEFINE THE ARCHIVE By Megan E. Pillow Dr._________________________________________ Marion Rust Director of Dissertation Dr.________________ Michael Trask _________________________ Director of Graduate Studies ___________05/08/2020 ______________________________ Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following dissertation, while an individual work, benefited from the insights and direction of quite a few people, first and foremost, my dissertation committee. My dissertation chair, Dr. Marion Rust, challenged me at every stage of this project and approached my work with the kind of rigor, compassion, and joy that I did not think possible and that I feel privileged to benefit from. Her insights, her patience, and her belief in me were instrumental in helping me finish this project. I could not have done this without her, and I can only hope someday to be the kind of scholar and person that she is. Frank X Walker was my very first writing teacher and mentor, and I have returned to the lessons he taught me time and again over the years for inspiration and to tackle my most difficult writing challenges. This dissertation was the hardest challenge I have faced yet, and I would not have made it to the end of this project without his insights and his support. Dr. Michelle Sizemore taught me more about the structure of academic argument in a single course than I learned in all of graduate school. She was always kind and always thoughtful, and her comments and evaluation at every stage of the dissertation process gave me a global understanding of the strengths and challenges in my larger argument that I would otherwise not have had. I cannot thank Dr. Sizemore enough for her wisdom and her guidance. I first met Dr. Carol Mason in a feminist theory class my second year of graduate school, where she told our class that one of the animating principles for her scholarly researching was getting angry enough to ask “what the fuck?” and then searching for the answer. I knew immediately that I wanted her on my committee, and I’ve used that same approach, as well as Dr. Mason’s incisive feedback, which always seemed to see iii where I was headed with my argument, even when I wasn’t sure myself. I’m also grateful for the assistance of Dr. Michael Trask and Dr. Brenda Brueggemann, two professors who served on my committee through my prospectus stage, and grateful for the dedication of time and energy from Dr. Mónica Díaz, who kindly agreed to be the outside examiner for my doctoral defense. Finally, thanks to my departmental colleague Leslie R. Malland, who so kindly formatted my dissertation to Graduate School specifications. I am deeply grateful to the University of Kentucky English Department and especially to the Graduate Committee for providing me with a Dissertation Semester Fellowship, which gave me much-needed time to work on this project without teaching responsibilities, and a Summer Research Fellowship, which allowed me to write, research, and travel to the New Bedford Whaling Museum during the summer of 2016. I also owe a thank you to librarians Kyle R. Triplett at the Brooke Russell Astor Reading Room at the New York Public Library and Mark D. Procknik at the Grimshaw-Gudewicz Reading Room at the New Bedford Whaling Museum. Both men assisted me in finding materials related to P.T. Barnum and the nineteenth century whaling industry that provided a great deal of context for this project, and I am deeply grateful for their assistance and their patience with me at every turn. In addition to the technical and instrumental assistance above, I received equally important assistance from family and friends. Kathy Barbour, Dee Goertz, and Melissa Eden, all professors at my alma mater Hanover College and all dear friends of my heart, wrote letters of recommendation for grad school, invited me to campus to teach in their classes and feed me lunch, and offered consistent, loving support through every year of this program, and I am so grateful for them. My ex-husband Jonathan Davis provided iv financial support for the first few years of my doctoral program, and I am grateful for that help and for the help of the Davis family as well. Deirdre Mikolajcik, Valerie Stevens, and Ben Wilson were all supportive during a very difficult period at the end of the dissertation writing process. Robin LaMer Rahija and Kristen Pickett were always available for questions, were always unfailing kind, and they solved so many problems for me during my time at UK that I know I wouldn’t have completed the program without their friendship and their mountains of administrative support.