DOCSLIB.ORG

An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan (Second Edition) Pashto Translation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan (Second Edition) Pashto Translation د ا ن د ا دی دو پ An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan (Second Edition) Pashto Translation ا ن د زده و وژ ه ( ALEP) د #" !رډ د ھ&%$ http://alep.stanford.edu [email protected] د #" !رډ د ھ&%$ *ون *ارډر() ۵۵٩ 1 0 ا/ت وي #" !رډ، *13!ر1 ، ٨۶١٠ – ٩۵٣٠۵ د ا ن 9 زده و وژه، د ا ن ا9A دی(دوھ@ ? پ) =>013 ;1::9 ;1:اCن: او او راج ران رګ ت ا ا ادران: # 1!0 اF1G ،FG ام D ن او د J K 3 2011 – 2010څ H د ALEP ډ;L Hی ٢٠٠٩ – ٢٠١٠ د L 013<= ALEPی ٢٠١١ – ٢٠١٢ د L 013<= ALEPی 3 " اان "! و) ھو رن &%$ # , () ھ#% 5س ر03 ) %* , ګ ٢٠٠٨ – ٢٠٠٩ د L 013<= ALEPی ا (# 6ا او او ,%ن *ک راج ران ٢٠١٠ – ٢٠١١ د L 013<= ALEPی ر+ ا8*# ت روز %#ا ا9 ٢٠٠٧ – ٢٠٠٨ د L 013<= ALEPی ا%0ا" ا:زا ا%! #ر "رد , 2ر (ن ,! "ګ ") %# "/ ,ز- 5س ری ا !01 %# ا رن ,2 !ن ب د ات و دو د ALEP وژې #O ران 6و2!ر ا> ,! د 6ھ <= ر? 5رري ا د ALEP د Q1G ن /HD ھG: ران ا8*# ( 2012) د دو را دورې ھG: ران , رو # (2012) 3 ګ (2011) "ن ھ (2010) 8# م. Bن (2009) "/ ,زف (2008) ج د ات و دو د #ر,ت 92 رودا ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... ح د ﭘﯾل ﺧﺑﺮې ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... ط ﻟوﻣ ی ﭘﺮﮐﯽ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 1 د ﺟﺰا ﺣﻘوق ﺳﺮﯾﺰه ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 1 .I ﺳﺮﯾﺰه ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 1 .II د ﺟﺰا ﺣﻘوﻗو ﻣوﺧﯥ ................................ ................................ ............................. 1 .1 ﺟﺰا ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 2 2. اﻣﻧﯾﺘﯽ ﺗداﺑﯾﺮ ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 5 .3 وﯾﺮول ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 6 4. د ﻣﺟﺮم اﺻﻼح ................................ ................................ ................................ 8 .III د ﺟﺰا ﺣﻘوﻗو ﺳﺮﭼﻴﻧﯥ ................................ ................................ .......................... 9 1. اﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻗﺎﻧون ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 9 .2 د ا$م I8ق ................................ ................................ ................................ 11 3. د ١٩٧٦ ﮐﺎل د ﺟﺰا ﻗﺎﻧون ................................ ................................ ................. 12 4. ﺗﻘﻧﻴﻧﻲ ﺳﻧدوﻧﻪ ................................ ................................ ................................ 12 IV. ﭘﻪ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺳﺘﺎن ﮐﯥ د ﺟﺰا ﺣﻘوﻗو ﺗﺎرﻳﺧﭼﻪ ................................ ................................ .... 13 1. د ﻣﺷﺮوطﻴت دورې ﻣﺧﮐﯥ د ﺟﺰاﻳﻲ ﻋداﻟت ﻣﻧﺷﺎء ................................ .................... 13 .2 دوه 5وﻧﻲ ﻣﺣﺎﮐﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺳﻴﺳﺘم : ١٩٢٠ - ١٩٦٤ ................................ ........................... 15 3. د ,0اJ 8 د LدKK#و وا#8 ! ................................ ................................ .. 16 4. د واﺣد ﻗﺿﺎﻳﻪ ﻧظﺎم ﺑﻴﺎ راﻣﻧﺢ ﺗﻪ ﮐول ................................ ................................ .... 18 اML$8ت ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 19 اﺧ<ﻠﻴک او ﻣﻌﻠوﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺳﺮﭼﻴﻧﯥ ................................ ................................ ............................. 20 دوھم ﭘﺮﮐﻲ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 21 ﺟﺮم ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 21 .I ﺳﺮﻳﺰه ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 21 .II د ,م LN ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 22 22 ................................ ................................ ................................ PN J O .1 2. ﻣﺎدي ﻋﻧﺻﺮ ................................ ................................ ................................ 24 د د ات و دو 3. ﻣﻌﻧوي ﻋﻧﺻﺮ ................................ ................................ ................................ 27 III. د ﺟﺮم طﺑﻘﻪ ﺑﻧدي ................................ ................................ .............................. 31 .1 د ﻗﺎﻧوﻧﻲ ﻋﻧﺻﺮ ﭘﻪ ﺑﻧﺳټ ................................ ................................ .................. 32 2. د ﻣﺎدي ﻋﻧﺻﺮ ﭘﺮ ﺑﻧﺳټ ................................ ................................ ................... 33 3. د Qي R!" 6 PN ................................ ................................ .................. 34 IV. دﺟﺮم ﺷﺮوع ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 34 .1 ﭘﻪ ﺟﺮم د ﺷﺮوع ﻋﻧﺎﺻﺮ ................................ ................................ ................... 35 2. د ﻧﺎﺷوﻧﻲ ﺟﺮم ﺮﻧ5واﻟﻲ ................................ ................................ .................. 36 3. د ﺟﺮم د ﺷﺮوع ﻣﺟﺎزات ................................ ................................ ................... 37 .V ډﻟﻪ اﻳﺰ ﻣﺟﺮﻣﻴت ................................ ................................ ............................... 38 1. ﭘﻪ ﺟﺮم ﮐﯥ ﻣﺮﺳﺘﻪ او ﻟﻣﺳوﻧﻪ ................................ ................................ ............. 38 2. اﺗﻔﺎق ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 40 د ﺑﺣث راﻏوﻧډﯾدا ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 42 اML$8ت ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 43 اB<> او Q3 S ................................ ................................ ............................ 44 درﯾم ﭘﺮﮐﯽ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 45 ﺟﺰاﯾﯽ ﻣﺳؤﻟﯾت ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 45 .I د ,م !T% ................................ ................................ ................................ 46 II. د ﺟﺰاﯾﯽ ﻣﺳؤﻟﯾت ﻣﺣدودﯾﺘوﻧﻪ ................................ ................................ ............... 48 1. ﺗوﺟﯾﻪ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 48 2. ﺑﺧJﻧﻪ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 54 3. د ﻋدﻟﯽ ادارې ﭘﻪ وړاﻧدې ﻧﻧ5وﻧﯥ – د ﺳﺮﭼﯾﻧو ﻣﺣدودﯾﺘوﻧﻪ ................................ .......... 60 III. د ﺣﮐﻣﯽ اﺷﺧﺎﺻو ﺟﺰاﯾﯽ ﻣﺳؤﻟﯾت ................................ ................................ .......... 61 د ﺑﺣث راﻏوﻧډﯾدا ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 62 اﺧ<ﻠﯾک او ﻣﻌﻠوﻣﺎﺗﯽ ﺳﺮﭼﯾﻧﯥ ................................ ................................ ............................. 63 ﻠ ورم ﭘﺮﮐﯽ : ﻣﺟﺎزات ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 64 .I اﺻﻠﯽ ﻣﺟﺎزات ................................ ................................ ................................ 65 1. د ﺣﮐﻣوﻧو/ ﻻرJودوﻧو د ﺗﻧظﯾم واک ................................ ................................ ....... 66 2. اﺣﺘﯾﺎط ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 66 3. دﺷدت ﺷﺮاﯾط ................................ ................................ ................................ 67 ه د ات و دو X UV .4اW ................................ ................................ ................................ 68 5. د اف " U ................................ ................................ ........................... 69 6. د دود0و /زا3 %:ره "#) – د اB$2 د 8) او P2) "#) ................................ ..... 70 .7 د NZ /زا3 *N ................................ ................................ ............. 71 Q[3 .II / اL ,0ا S ................................ ................................ ......................... 73 III. 3*) ,0ا S ................................ ................................ ................................ 73 .IV \ ر* O ! ................................ ................................ ..................... 75 د "^[ را\ _#ا ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 77 اB<> او Q3 S ................................ ................................ ............................ 79 ﭘﻧ<م ﭘﺮﮐﯽ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 81 د اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺳﺘﺎن ﺟﺰا ﭘﻪ ﺣﻘوﻗو ﮐﯥ اﺻﻠﯽ ﺟﺮﻣوﻧﻪ ................................ ................................ .......... 81 .I ﺳﺮﯾﺰه ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 82 1. ﻗﺎﻧوﻧﯾت ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 83 2. ﻗﺎﻧوﻧﯽ ﺗﻔﺳﯾﺮ ................................ ................................ ................................ 83 ﻟوﻣ ی ﺑﺮﺧﻪ : اﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﺣﻘوق د اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺳﺘﺎن ﺟﺰا ﺣﻘوﻗو د ﺳﺮﭼﯾﻧﯥ ﭘﻪ ﺗو5ﻪ ...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal of Terrorism Research, Volume 5, Issue 3 (2014)
    ISSN: 2049-7040 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Contents Articles 3 Drones, The US And The New Wars In Africa 3 by Philip Attuquayefio The Central Intelligence Agency’s Armed Remotely Piloted Vehicle-Supported Counter-Insurgency Campaign in Pakistan – a Mission Undermined by Unintended Consequences? 14 by Simon Bennett Human Bombing - A Religious Act 31 by Mohammed Ilyas Entering the Black Hole: The Taliban, Terrorism, and Organised Crime 39 by Matthew D. Phillips, Ph.D. and Emily A. Kamen The Theatre of Cruelty: Dehumanization, Objectification & Abu Ghraib 49 by Christiana Spens Book Review 70 Andrew Silke, et al., (edited by Andrew Silke). Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform.Routledge: Oxon UK, 2014. pp. 282. £28.99. ISBN: 978-0-415- 81038-8. 70 reviewed by Robert W. Hand About JTR 74 JTR, Volume 5, Issue 3 – September 2014 Articles Drones, The US And The New Wars In Africa by Philip Attuquayefio This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Introduction ince the early 20th Century, Africa has witnessed varying degrees of subversion from the Mau Mau nationalist campaigners in Kenya in the 1950s to acts by rebel groups in the infamous intrastate wars Sof Sub-Saharan Africa. While the first movement evolved mainly from political acts geared towards the struggle for independence, the latter was mostly evident in attempts to obtain psychological or strategic advantages by combatants in the brutal civil wars of Liberia, Sierra Leone, the African Great Lakes region and a number of such civil war theatres in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas
    An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas By Ryan Feeney 2008 Pulliam Kilgore Intern Bruce W. Sanford Bruce D. Brown Laurie A. Babinski BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Washington, D.C. Counsel to the Society of Professional Journalists September 2008 In the throes of the American Civil Rights movement as Southern blacks flexed their political might against segregation, a city commissioner in Alabama sued the country‟s most prominent newspaper, The New York Times. L.B. Sullivan‟s libel suit sought to silence the implication of his critics that he was part of a racist Southern oligarchy responsible for the violent suppression of black protests in Montgomery. It failed, and an uniquely American brand of free speech was born. In deciding that landmark free-speech case, New York Times v. Sullivan, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court noted how libel suits such as Sullivan‟s threatened “the very existence of an American press virile enough to publish unpopular views on public affairs.” Throughout modern American history, linking a person to an unpopular group has often led to a rash of libel suits against the press. It happened with communism in the 1940s, organized crime in the 1970s, and homosexuality in the 1980s under the stigmatizing glare of the AIDS epidemic. Yet in the more than four decades since the New York Times decision, American libel plaintiffs have found it acutely difficult to muzzle the press. But these free speech protections apply only on American soil, which means they cannot be used against the latest wave of libel litigants who bring suits overseas – foreigners accused of terrorism ties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Trans-National Libel, 60 Am
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2012 The rP oblem of Trans-National Libel Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, and the Jurisdiction Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, The Problem of Trans-National Libel, 60 Am. J. Comp. L. 507 (2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LILI LEVI* The Problem of Trans-National Libelt Forum shopping in trans-nationallibel cases-"libel tourism"- has a chilling effect on journalism, academic scholarship,and scien- tific criticism. The United States and Britain (the most popular venue for such cases) have recently attempted to address the issue legisla- tively. In 2010, the United States passed the SPEECH Act, which prohibits recognition and enforcement of libel judgments from juris- dictions applying law less speech-protective than the First Amendment. In Britain, consultation has closed and the Parliamen- tary Joint Committee has issued its report on a broad-ranginglibel reform bill proposed by the Government in March 2011. This Article questions the extent to which the SPEECH Act and the Draft Defama- tion Bill will accomplish their stated aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Opiate Trade 2009.Indb
    ADDICTION, CRIME AND INSURGENCY The transnational threat of Afghan opium UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna ADDICTION, CRIME AND INSURGENCY The transnational threat of Afghan opium Copyright © United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), October 2009 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the UNODC Studies and Threat Analysis Section (STAS), in the framework of the UNODC Trends Monitoring and Analysis Programme/Afghan Opiate Trade sub-Programme, and with the collaboration of the UNODC Country Office in Afghanistan and the UNODC Regional Office for Central Asia. UNODC field offices for East Asia and the Pacific, the Middle East and North Africa, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Southern Africa, South Asia and South Eastern Europe also provided feedback and support. A number of UNODC colleagues gave valuable inputs and comments, including, in particular, Thomas Pietschmann (Statistics and Surveys Section) who reviewed all the opiate statistics and flow estimates presented in this report. UNODC is grateful to the national and international institutions which shared their knowledge and data with the report team, including, in particular, the Anti Narcotics Force of Pakistan, the Afghan Border Police, the Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan and the World Customs Organization. Thanks also go to the staff of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and of the United Nations Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan. Report Team Research and report preparation: Hakan Demirbüken (Lead researcher, Afghan
    [Show full text]
  • Barbarians at the Gate
    SMALL WARS JOURNAL smallwarsjournal.com From the TBA to the USA: Barbarians at the Gate by Marilyn Stern On October 10, 2010, an illegal Mexican immigrant was found beheaded in Phoenix, Arizona as a result of the Mexican drug wars. On October 27, 2010, drug gangs attacked the headquarters of the Los Ramones, Mexico, police department with grenades and the police force quit en masse the next day. The following research provides pertinent background to the increasing chaos at the U.S. southwest border that the federal government continues to ignore. In The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership, Zbigniew Brzezinski, advisor to U.S. Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, and Bush, Sr., wrote in 2004, For America, the linkage between state sovereignty and national security was traditionally even more symbiotic than for most other states. The linkage was reinforced by the awareness that geography made America a sanctuary. With two huge oceans providing extraordinary security buffers and with much weaker neighbors to the north and south, Americans considered their nation‟s sovereignty to be both a natural right as well as a natural consequence of peerless national security (emphasis added). Even when America was drawn into two world wars, it was the Americans who crossed the oceans to combat others in distant lands. Americans went to war, but war did not come to America.1 Today, America‟s geographical boundaries no longer provide that sense of security. In fact, there is a war being waged just beyond America‟s southwestern border. Mexican drug cartels, ruthless in their lawlessness, are in a bloody competition for superiority.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism Stephen Bates
    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 33 | Number 3 Article 3 1-1-2011 More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism Stephen Bates Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Bates, More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism, 33 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 379 (2011). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism by * STEPHEN BATES I. Libel Tourism .................................................................................................................... 380 II. Breach of Privacy in Britain ............................................................................................. 388 III. Publication of Private Facts in the United States ........................................................... 395 IV. Counterarguments ............................................................................................................. 401 V. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICC-02/17 Date: 20 November 2017 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before
    ICC-02/17-7-Red 20-11-2017 1/181 NM PT ras Original: English No.: ICC-02/17 Date: 20 November 2017 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua, Presiding Judge Judge Chang-ho Chung Judge Raul C. Pangalangan SITUATION IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF AFGHANISTAN PUBLIC with confidential, EX PARTE, Annexes 1, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 4C, 6, public Annexes 4, 5 and 7, and public redacted version of Annex 1-Conf-Exp Public redacted version of “Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15”, 20 November 2017, ICC-02/17-7-Conf-Exp Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-02/17-7-Red 20-11-2017 2/181 NM PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Mrs Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Mr Benjamin Gumpert Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Defence Support Section Mr Herman von Hebel Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Mr Nigel Verrill No. ICC- 02/17 2/181 20 November 2017 ICC-02/17-7-Red 20-11-2017 3/181 NM PT I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 6 II. Confidentiality .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Americans Must End America's Self-Generating Wars な ぜアメリカ
    Volume 10 | Issue 36 | Number 2 | Article ID 3819 | Aug 28, 2012 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Why Americans Must End America’s Self-Generating Wars な ぜアメリカ人はアメリカが自ら引き起こす戦争をやめるべきか Peter Dale Scott French translation isavailable ; produces more terrorists than it eliminates. German translation isavailable ; And it has become inextricably combined with Spanish translation isavailable ; America’s earlier self-generating and hopelessly unwinnable war, the so-called War Italian translation isavailable on Drugs. The most urgent political challenge to the The two self-generating wars have in effect world today is how to prevent the so-called become one. By launching a War on Drugs in “pax Americana” from progressively Colombia and Mexico, America has contributed degenerating, like the 19th-century so-called to a parastate of organized terror in Colombia “pax Britannica” before it, into major global (the so-called AUC, United Self-Defense Forces warfare. I say “so-called,” because each “pax,” of Colombia) and an even bloodier reign of in its final stages, became less and less terror in Mexico (with 50,000 killed in the last peaceful, less and less orderly, more and more six years).1 By launching a War on Terror in a naked imposition of belligerent competitive Afghanistan in 2001, America has contributed power based on inequality. to a doubling of opium production there, To define this prevention of war as anmaking Afghanistan now the source of 90 achievable goal may sound pretentious. But the percent of the world’s heroin and most of the 2 necessary steps to be taken are above all world’s hashish.
    [Show full text]
  • Libel Tourism's Final Boarding Call
    ELLEN FORMATTED 1/19/2010 3:39 PM LIBEL TOURISM’S FINAL BOARDING CALL Ellen Bernstein* INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 205 I. BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 209 II. ANALYSIS ............................................................................. 215 A. American Libel Law................................................. 216 B. British Libel Law ..................................................... 219 C. Dangers of Libel Tourism ........................................ 222 D. Legislative Solutions, and Support and Opposition Thereto .................................................. 223 CONCLUSION ............................................................................ 226 INTRODUCTION Imagine that you are a popular, United States-based entertainer who enjoys an international reputation. Imagine further that, on a trip to the grocery store, you discover that you and your spouse – also a well-known entertainer– are on the cover of a tabloid newspaper that links you to a drug scandal.1 You decide to sue the tabloid for damages, a retraction, and a public apology.2 You are aware, however, that American law places a heavy burden on celebrity plaintiffs in libel actions.3 Luckily for you, the story also appeared in the publication‟s international editions.4 With the assistance of an attorney based in Northern Ireland, you sue * J.D. Candidate, 2010, Seton Hall University School of Law; B.A., 2005, George Washington University. I would like to thank Professor David Opderbeck for his guidance during the writing of this Comment. I would also like to thank my family for their support and encouragement. 1. See Jennifer Lopez, Marc Anthony Suing National Enquirer, FOXNEWS.COM, Apr. 16, 2007, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,266408,00.html [hereinafter Jennifer Lopez]. 2. Id. 3. See ROBERT D. SACK, SACK ON DEFAMATION § 2.1.1 (3d ed. 2007); Michael M. Rosen, Ah, the Adventures of Libel Tourism, POLITICO.COM, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 37 Number 3 Article 7 Spring 2012 The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Molly Thebes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Molly Thebes, The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange, 37 N.C. J. INT'L L. 889 (2011). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol37/iss3/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This note is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol37/iss3/ 7 The Prospect of Extraditing Julian Assange Molly Thebes t I. Introduction .......................... ...... 889 II. Is Julian Assange a Journalist .......... ...... ......... 894 III. The Feasibility of Extraditing Journalists ....... ...... 898 A. Sweden ........................... ..... 899 B. Iceland.............903 1. Libel Tourism .................... ..... 904 2. Source Protection.. ................. ..... 906 3. Whistleblower Protections.....................907 4. International Effect of the Initiative ...... .... 908 5. Limitations of the Initiative .......... ...... 909 C. European Media Laws ................ ..... 911 IV. Conclusion............... ................. 913 I. Introduction The legal battle over the custody of Julian Assange has been well publicized in the media, with both Sweden and the United States vying for authority over the WikiLeaks founder and ex- computer hacker.' While the United States is seeking jurisdiction over Assange for his well-documented involvement in the unauthorized acquisition and dissemination of a quarter of a million diplomatic cables2 and tens of thousands of wartime tB.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Criminal Law, Customary Justice and Informal Dispute Resolution
    European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan Criminal law, customary justice and informal dispute resolution Country of Origin Information Report July 2020 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Afghanistan Criminal law, customary justice and informal dispute resolution Country of Origin Information Report July 2020 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9485-649-4 doi: 10.2847/41077 © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2020 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © ResoluteSupportMedia/22nd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment Photo by Pfc. David Hauk, 13 January 2010 url CC BY 2.0 The Afghan National Army held a shura, a meeting with the local leaders, after the two-day mission was complete. The leaders discussed what the ANA can do to ensure the local people’s safety and projects that will make their living conditions better. 4 — EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT - AFGHANISTAN: CRIMINAL LAW, CUSTOMARY JUSTICE, DISPUTE RESOLUTION Acknowledgements This report was drafted by the European Asylum Support Office Country of Origin Information (COI) Sector. The following national asylum and migration department contributed by reviewing this report: The Netherlands, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis, Ministry of Justice It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned department contributes to the overall quality of the report, but it does not necessarily imply its formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Globalization of Terror Funding
    THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 74 The Globalization of Terror Funding Gil Feiler © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel http://www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 September 2007 The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The BESA Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University was founded by Dr. Thomas O. Hecht, a Canadian Jewish community leader. The Center is dedicated to the memory of Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, who concluded the first Arab-Israel peace agreement. The Center, a non-partisan and independent institute, seeks to contribute to the advancement of Middle East peace and security by conducting policy-relevant research on strategic subjects, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author's views or conclusions. BESA Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center, for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East. A listing of recent BESA publications can be found at the end of this booklet.
    [Show full text]