DOCSLIB.ORG

Outcomes of the 'Arctic: Territory of Dialogue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outcomes of the 'Arctic: Territory of Dialogue OUTCOMES OF THE ‘ARCTIC: TERRITORY OF DIALOGUE’ INTERNATIONAL ARCTIC FORUM 2019 CONTENTS Investing in the Arctic: 8 a new approach Infrastructure – the foundation 14 for Arctic development One Arctic for the 22 entire world The Arctic – 27 territory of life THE INTERNATIONAL ARCTIC FORUM 2019 IN FIGURES The Forum was attended by >3,600 representatives of the political, scientific, and business communities COUNTRIES REPRESENTED and leading media outlets from Russia and around the world The Forum was covered by 845media representatives The Forum saw from the signing 16 of countries: Russia, Canada, China, Estonia, Finland, 45agreements France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, Largest delegations: Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, the United worth Kingdom, Vietnam, and the United States RUB billion* • Norway • Sweden • Iceland 69,8 • China • USA • Canada 52countries • Finland • Denmark • Japan 4 INTERNATIONAL ARCTIC FORUM 2019 IN FIGURES INTERNATIONAL ARCTIC FORUM 2019 IN FIGURES 5 The ‘Arctic: Territory of Dialogue’ 5th International Arctic Forum was held on 9–10 April 2019 in St. Petersburg under the theme ‘The Arctic. An Ocean of Opportunity’. The Forum agenda was devoted to discussions on the comprehensive socioeconomic development of Arctic territories and the development of mechanisms for the discovery and effective exploitation of the region's resource potential. “I am pleased to note that this Forum, which has now become a regular event, enjoys broad public support. Its noble goals unite expert and research communities, as well as prominent politicians and businesspeople from different countries – those who, in their official capacity or at the bidding of their heart, are involved in the important work of promoting the harmonious development of the Arctic and the preservation of its unique nature and the distinctive cultural traditions of the local peoples,” said President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin in his welcome address to Forum participants. 6 Arctic: Territory of Dialogue Arctic: Territory of Dialogue 7 INVESTING IN THE ARCTIC: A NEW APPROACH The Arctic is full of potential for invest- sumption is growing by about 1.6% annu- complex and the Bovanenkovsk and ment. ally, which is the highest rate of energy Kharasaveysk gas fields. consumption in the world. By 2035, the “According to preliminary estimates, share of natural gas in the global energy Chairman of the Management Board we have about 13 billion tonnes mix will reach 26%, compared to 23% and Member of the Board of Directors of oil and 95 trillion cubic metres today. Meanwhile, LNG's share of the gas of NOVATEK Leonid Mikhelson told of natural gas. They represent trade is expected to reach 51% by 2025, International Arctic Forum 2019 par- colossal planetary reserves,” said and 70% by 2040. As such, Russia is Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian poised to take up 30–40% of the global Federation. LNG market. “The Arctic is <...> a risk zone, but those risks are manageable; Experts estimate that the Arctic is home The Arctic is already Russia's primary it is a zone of efficient, to 13% of the world's undiscovered oil source of gas. predictable economic affairs.” reserves and approximately 30% of the world's undiscovered natural gas “Today, Russia produces 725 billion Maxim Akimov, Deputy Prime reserves. A significant portion thereof is cubic metres, of which 83% is pro- Minister of the Russian Federation located within Russian territory. duced in the Arctic zone. That gas is The Arctic accounts The Arctic is competitive, despite the fact that it ticipants that his company is currently for about home to The significance of these reserves is is produced in the Arctic, because of implementing a new project, Arctic growing with global demand for hydro- the low cost of production and very LNG-2, that boasts a higher capacity carbons, especially for natural gas. good quality of natural resources,” than the Yamal LNG project. A number % % said Alexander Novak. of major contracts related to this project As Minister of Energy of the Russian Fed- have already been signed, including 6 13 % eration Alexander Novak noted during Globally significant projects include the one making French energy corporation of Russia's GDP of the world's undiscovered the Forum, the rate of global gas con- Yamal liquefied natural gas production Total a shareholder. By the end of the and oil reserves and 83 % % of Russian gas comes 11 30 from the Arctic zone of investments of undiscovered natural in fixed assets gas reserves International Arctic Forum, agreements The Arctic accounts for approx- The development of Arctic fields acts as were also signed with the Chinese imately 6% of Russia's GDP, and a driver for the development of Russia's companies CNODC and CNOOC. 11% of investments in fixed assets. economy as a whole. Negotiations are in progress with partners from the Persian Gulf, Japan, “The Arctic is <...> a risk zone, but “According to our estimates, LNG and South Korea. those risks are manageable; it is a projects will provide work for about zone of efficient, predictable eco- 800 Russian enterprises and create Russia's Arctic zone also contains sig- nomic affairs,” said Maxim Akimov, about 80,000 jobs all over Russia,” nificant reserves of nickel, copper, and Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian said Leonid Mikhelson. rare-earth metals. Federation. 8 Investing in the Arctic: a new approach Investing in the Arctic: a new approach 9 OBJECTIVE: SOLUTIONS Comprehensive support of projects in the Arctic region There are a number of macroeconomic • Developing domestic software for LNG The Russian government is paying par- the Far East Development Fund for problems that are barriers to harness- plants (currently, 80% of software is ticular attention to the development of selective financing of Arctic projects.” ing the economic potential of the Arctic. foreign) based on government procure- the Arctic region. The foremost of these is the significant ment. “We will expand the work of all Far cost of operations, which is related to New government bodies have been created Eastern development institutions to increased spending on transporting fuel, • Localizing the production of seismic to manage the territory: the Arctic is part of the Arctic region. This means that materials, and equipment; the cost of equipment in Russia. the purview of the Ministry for the Develop- we will help with land procurement, labour; accelerated technological depre- ment of the Russian Far East. “This year individually supervise each pro- ciation; the need to compensate for eco- • Improving financing mechanisms for we are going to draft and adopt a ject, provide support when it comes logical risks; and underdeveloped infra- fundamental and applied research in new strategy for the development of to protection from inspections, and structure. the Arctic, taking into account sustain- the Russian Arctic up to 2035,” said provide financing at subsidized able development principles. Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian rates,” said Yury Trutnev, Deputy Prime Forum participants also noted the lack of Federation. Minister of the Russian Federation and technologies for Arctic geological explo- Presidential Plenipotentiary Envoy to the ration and dependence on foreign suppli- President Putin has also said that all avail- Far Eastern Federal District. ers of goods and services. This problem Experts from the SKOLKOVO able investment support tools must be lev- is becoming increasingly significant due Moscow School of Management eraged in order to increase investment in Speaking at the Forum, Minister for the to sanctions. predict that LNG projects could see the region and launch new projects, includ- Development of the Russian Far East and ing tools that have been used successfully the Arctic Alexander Kozlov highlighted “Nobody yet possesses the technology in Russia's Far Eastern region development that his agency offers two types of tax needed to develop deposits located > RUB programmes. Taking the specific fea- benefits for new projects in the Arctic in water bodies which are largely tures of the Arctic into account, “investors zone. under ice. <…> State support for the should and will receive more advanced programme to build drilling capac- and more stable preferences,” he said. • The first option confers tax benefits for ity is not tangible, due to the fact that 10 years for projects worth up to RUB said 300 The Russian Federation has already devel- 100 billion and for 15 years for pro- it is completely non-existent,” Mikhail Grigoryev, Director and co-owner billion oped government programmes in six jects worth upwards of RUB 100 billion. of GECON Geological Consulting Centre. in additional investments before strategic development areas related to The corporate income tax, extractive 2023. This would allow medium- the Arctic: aviation, shipbuilding, special resource production tax, property tax, “Exploration of hydrocarbons and tonnage LNG production capacities technologies, navigation, oil and gas tech- and land tax would be 0%, with 7.6% equipment for shelf development: to increase by nologies, and special materials. Those insurance contributions. we must attain independence here involved in the implementation of innova- by 2021, given the pressure on our tive projects as part of these government • The second option involves benefits energy companies from the sanc- programmes should receive support in the over the entire implementation period tions,” said Oleg Ryazantsev, Deputy million form of tax benefits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Voter Alignments in a Dominant Party System: the Cleavage Structures of the Russian Federation
    Voter alignments in a dominant party system: The cleavage structures of the Russian Federation. Master’s Thesis Department of Comparative Politics November 2015 Ivanna Petrova Abstract This thesis investigates whether there is a social cleavage structure across the Russian regions and whether this structure is mirrored in the electoral vote shares for Putin and his party United Russia on one hand, versus the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leader Gennady Zyuganov on the other. In addition to mapping different economic, demographic and cultural factors affecting regional vote shares, this thesis attempts to determine whether there is a party system based on social cleavages in Russia. In addition, as the Russian context is heavily influenced by the president, this thesis investigates whether the same cleavages can explain the distribution of vote shares during the presidential elections. Unemployment, pensioners, printed newspapers and ethnicity create opposing effects during parliamentary elections, while distance to Moscow, income, pensioners, life expectancy, printed newspapers and ethnicity created opposing effects during the presidential elections. The first finding of this thesis is not only that the Russian party system is rooted in social cleavages, but that it appears to be based on the traditional “left-right” cleavage that characterizes all Western industrialized countries. In addition, despite the fact that Putin pulls voters from all segments of the society, the pattern found for the party system persists during presidential elections. The concluding finding shows that the main political cleavage in today’s Russia is between the left represented by the communists and the right represented by the incumbents.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 2019 Pdf 0.16 MB
    Programme of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club “The Dawn of the East and the World Political Order” Sochi, September 30 – October 3, 2019 September 30, Monday 10:00 – 10:10 Opening of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Valdai Club Andrey Bystritskiy, Chairman of the Board of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club 10:10 – 12:00 Session 1. The Strategic Landscape: An Eastern Perspective. Presentation of the Valdai Club Report The world politics is experiencing fundamental changes. They are not only about the shifting balance of forces or redistribution of financial streams and economic capabilities. Countries, whose political and strategic culture is fundamentally different from the western notions, which have been dominant in the previous centuries, are beginning to play the leading roles on the international arena. The future world order will emerge in an environment of pluralism of ideas, taking into account views and positions of the leading non-western countries. What are these views? What does Russia’s role look like in these systems of coordinates? Speakers: • Yuichi Hosoya, Professor of International Politics, Keio University • C Raja Mohan, Director, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore • Wang Yiwei, Director, Institute of International Affairs and Centre for European Union Studies, Renmin University of China • Hasan Basri Yalçın, Director of Strategic Studies, SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research Moderator: Fyodor Lukyanov, Research Director of the Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club 2 12:30 – 14:30 Session 2. Middle East as a World Politics Lab Since the early 21st century, the Middle East has been in the international spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia House in Davos Is the Official Russian Residence on 23 January
    Roscongress Foundation Phone: +7 (495) 640 4440 12 Krasnopresnenskaya +7 (812) 680 0000 Emb, Moscow 123610, Fax: +7 (812) 680 0034 Russia [email protected] Russia House in Davos is the official Russian residence On 23 January 2018, during the World Economic Forum, Russia’s official residence in Davos – the Russia House – will be opened. The project serves as a platform for promoting Russian initiatives among the representatives of international business and official circles who get together in Davos, Switzerland (23–26 January 2018). Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich will lead the official delegation of the Russian government in 2018. As in previous years, the Russia House in Davos will attract World Economic Forum guests and participants with its highly topical business programme, covering the urgent issues of contemporary global development, and will also present the successful experience of Russia’s dialogue with the international community. The organizer of the Russia House in Davos, the Roscongress Foundation, has prepared a functional multi-format space for the Forum’s extensive business agenda. The first day of the Russia House operation will be devoted to information technology. The panel discussion ‘Update on IT in Russia’ will be attended by Minister of Communications and Mass Media of Russia Nikolai Nikiforov and the heads of major IT companies. Andrei Kuzyaev, President of AO ER-Telecom Holding, Kaspersky Lab CEO Eugene Kaspersky and others will discuss a broad range of issues, from blockchain and FinTech to cyber security and smart city technologies. On the second day, the heads of fuel and energy companies will meet to talk about Russia’s competitiveness on the global energy market.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Macro-Politics: Political Pragmatism Or, Economic Necessity
    The National Projects December 2019 Population and GDP (2020E data) The long and winding road Population 146.8 GDP, Nominal, US$ bln $1,781 Plans are worthless. Planning is essential” GDP/Capita, US$ $12,132 Dwight D. Eisenhower GDP/Capita, PPP, US$ $27,147 Source: World Bank, World-o-Meters, MA The National Projects (NP) are at the core of the Russian government’s efforts to pull the economy out of the current slump, National Projects - Spending* to create sustainable diversified long-term growth and to improve Rub, Bln US$ Bln lifestyle conditions in Russia. It is the key element of President Putin’s Human Capital 5,729 $88 effort to establish his legacy. Health 1,726 $27 Education 785 $12 We are now initiating coverage of the National Projects strategy. We Demographics 3,105 $48 will provide regular detailed updates about the progress in each of Culture 114 $2 the major project sectors, focusing especially on the opportunities Quality of Life 9,887 $152 Safer Roads 4,780 $74 for foreign investors and on the mechanisms for them to take part. Housing 1,066 $16 ▪ What is it? A US$390 billion program of public spending, designed Ecology 4,041 $62 to stimulate investment, build infrastructure and improve health Economic Growth 10,109 $156 and well-being by 2024, i.e. the end of the current presidential Science 636 $10 Small Business Development 482 $7 term. Digital Economy 1,635 $25 ▪ Is this a return to Soviet-style planning? For some of the NPs, Labour productivity 52 $1 Export Support 957 $15 especially those involving infrastructure, it certainly looks like it.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S
    WikiLeaks Document Release http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL32662 February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL32662 Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests Jim Nichol, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division January 23, 2007 Abstract. assesses Russia’s progress in democratization, including in the areas of elections, media rights, civil society, and federalism. Four scenarios of possible future political developments are suggested - a continuation of the current situation of ”managed democracy,” deepening authoritarianism, further democratization, or a chaotic interlude - and evidence and arguments are weighed for each. Lastly, U.S. policy and implications for U.S. interests, congressional concerns, and issues for Congress are analyzed. Order Code RL32662 Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests Updated January 23, 2007 Jim Nichol http://wikileaks.org/wiki/CRS-RL32662 Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests Summary U.S. attention has focused on Russia’s fitful democratization since Russia emerged in 1991 from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many observers have argued that a democratic Russia with free markets would be a cooperative bilateral and multilateral partner rather than an insular and hostile national security threat. Concerns about democratization progress appeared heightened after Vladimir Putin became president in 2000. Since then, Russians have faced increased government interference in elections and campaigns, restrictions on freedom of the media, large- scale human rights abuses in the breakaway Chechnya region, and the forced breakup of Russia’s largest private oil firm, Yukos, as an apparent warning to entrepreneurs not to support opposition parties or otherwise challenge government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4. China and Yamal Lng
    Table of Contents ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………....4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1. RUSSIAN-CHINESE COOPERATION IN OIL BUSINESS .......................... 9 Russian-Chinese Trade: Oil & Oil products ............................................................................................................. 9 Russian-Chinese Contracts: crude oil supply ......................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 2. RUSSIA-CHINA COOPERATION IN COAL BUSINESS ............................ 17 Russian-Chinese Trade: Thermal & Coking coal ................................................................................................... 17 Russian-Chinese Contracts: Coal supply ................................................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER 3. RUSSIA-CHINA COOPERATION IN GAS BUSINESS ............................... 24 CHAPTER 4. CHINA AND YAMAL LNG .............................................................................. 29 CHAPTER 5. CHINESE COMPANIES ENTER SIBUR ....................................................... 32 CHAPTER 6. CHINA'S POLICY TOWARDS THE NORTHERN SEA ROUTE .............. 34 CHAPTER 7. CHINA PARTICIPATES IN OFFSHORE PROJECTS IN RUSSIA ........... 37 CHAPTER 7.1 CHINA’S PARTICIPATION IN OTHER ENERGY PROJECTS IN RUSSIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Governs the Russian Economy? a Cross-Section of Russia's Largest Corporations
    Kari Liuhto & Peeter Vahtra Who governs the Russian economy? A cross-section of Russia's largest corporations Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 12/2009 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Who governs the Russian economy? A cross-section of Russia's largest corporations 1 Kari Liuhto2 and Peeter Vahtra3 12/2009 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute http://www.tse.fi/pei 1 We wish to thank the following Finnish research foundations which have made it possible to conduct this report and numerous earlier studies linked with the theme; Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Foundation for Economic Education, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, The Marcus Wallenberg Economic Foundation and The Paulo Foundation. 2 Kari Liuhto is Professor in International Business and Director of the Pan-European Institute at the Turku School of Economics. His research interests include EU-Russia economic relations, energy relations in particular, foreign investments into Russia and the investments of Russian firms abroad, and economic policy measures of strategic significance. Liuhto has worked as an expert in several Russia-related projects funded by both Finnish institutions and foreign ones, such as the European Commission, the European Parliament, the United Nations, and the World Bank. 3 Peeter Vahtra is a Research Fellow at the Pan-European Institute at the Turku School of Economics. His areas of research expertise include Russia’s energy policy, FDI to and from Russia and Russia’s economic policy. Kari Liuhto and Peeter Vahtra PEI Electronic Publications 12/2009 www.tse.fi/pei __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents 1. The state has increased its ownership in big business, but left small and medium-sized companies untouched 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – the Competition for Customers
    Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – The Competition for Customers James Henderson NG 73 January 2013 The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, of any of the Institute’s members, and/or of the author’s other affiliations. Copyright © 2013 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-66-4 ii Abbreviations and Units of Measurement bbls Barrels bcm Billion cubic metres bcma Billion cubic metres per annum bn bbls Billion barrels boepd Barrels of oil equivalent per day bpd Barrels per day E&P Exploration and Production ESPO East Siberia – Pacific Ocean (Pipeline) FSU Former Soviet Union IOC International Oil Company kboepd Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day kbpd Thousands of barrels per day km Kilometres mm bbls Million barrels mcm Thousands of cubic metres mmboepd Millions of barrels of oil equivalent per day] mmbpd Millions of barrels per day mmbtu Million British thermal units mmcm Millions of cubic metres mmt Millions of tonnes mmtpa Millions of tonnes per annum Mm tonnes Millions of tonnes P&P Proved and Probable tcm
    [Show full text]
  • Program Structure* August 8, 2019
    PROGRAM STRUCTURE* AUGUST 8, 2019 09:00 Registration of participants Plenary session 10:00-12:00 Digital transformation and reset of the legislation: scenarios for the development of a civilized taxi market in Russia 12:00-12:30 Coffee-break / Visiting the exposition Working session Round table 12:30-14:00 Business to business: the best products and Urban transport of the future: innovation against services for the taxi industry habits 14:00-14:45 Lunch Working session Panel session 14:45-16:15 Control 2.0: Technological control and data Taxi fares: Is there justice and who will establish it? usage in the taxi industry 16:15-16:30 Break 16:30-18:00 Panel discussion "What is a legal taxi?" AUGUST 9, 2019 09:30 Registration of participants Plenary session 10:30-12:00 Development trends of the world taxi market 12:00-12:15 Coffee-break Working session Working session 12:15-13:45 Regional markets: common rules - different Driver: employee, contractor, partner or slave to the solutions system? 13:45-14:15 Lunch Working session Panel discussion 14:15-15:45 Taxi insurance system transformation: Play by own rules: how to create a competitive advantage challenges and solutions in the modern market 15:45-16:00 Break Panel session Working session 16:00-17:00 Mobility 4.0: transport as an integrated Finance and taxes: calculations and reporting in the taxi service business 17:00-17:10 Break 17:10-18:00 MEFT Public Council Meeting 18:00-19:00 Closing cocktail *subject to change without notice AUGUST 8, 2019 Plenary session 10:00 – 12:00 Digital transformation
    [Show full text]
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody February 7, 2019 Issue No. 2019/05 Company News En+ Group says finishes 1st stage of securities swap with Glencore On February 1, 2019 it was reported that En+ Group fulfilled the first stage of a securities exchange with Swiss trader Glencore. As a result, En+ Group bought a 2% stake in aluminum producer RUSAL from an affiliate of Glencore and raised its stake to 50.12%. A transfer of a 6.75% RUSAL stake to En+Group must be made automatically no later than February 2020. In April 2018, the U.S. imposed sanctions against 38 Russian tycoons, government officials and companies, including Oleg Deripaska and companies he controlled - En+ Group, RUSAL, and power producer EuroSibEnergo. In January, Deripaska transferred control over the companies, and his representatives were removed from their board of directors, and the Treasury lifted the sanctions on January 27. As a result, Deripaska owns 44.95% of En+ Group and has the right to vote with a 35% stake, VTB holds 21.68% of the shares and has the right to vote with a 7.35% stake, Citi is a nominal owner of 10.55%, which trader Glencore received in exchange for 8.75% in RUSAL; Citi owns 4.54%, but the right to vote belongs to institutional and retail investors. They also own 4.88%, and can manage a 9.42% combined stake. The members of Deripaska’s family hold 6.75%, charity fund Volnoye Delo 3.22%, other minority shareholders 3.42%. Independent managers have the right to manage the stakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Advocacy Coalitions
    Russian Advocacy Coalitions A study in Power Resources This study examines the advocacy coalitions in Russia. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework, it looks at the power resource distribution amongst the coalitions, and how this distribution affects Russian foreign policy. The power resources examined are: Formal Legal Authority; Public Opinion; Information; Mobilizable Troops; and Financial Resources. In addition to this, the study used quantitative and qualitative methods to identify these resources. There are a couple of conclusions we may draw from this study. The method is useful in identifying power resources. It is not enough to use only the distribution of resources amongst coalitions in order to explain policy changes. It is found that the distribution of resources, coupled with coalition interaction, is enough to explain changes in Russian foreign policy. KEYWORDS: Advocacy Coalition Framework, Russia, Power Resources, Natural Gas WORDS: 24,368 Author: Robert Granlund Supervisor: Fredrik Bynander Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 OUTLINE..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S
    Order Code RL32662 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests Updated January 28, 2005 Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests Summary U.S. attention has focused on Russia’s fitful democratization since Russia emerged in 1991 from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many observers have argued that a democratic Russia with free markets would be a cooperative bilateral and multilateral partner rather than an insular and hostile national security threat. Concerns about democratization progress appeared heightened after Vladimir Putin became president in 2000. Since then, there has been increased government interference in elections and campaigns, restrictions on freedom of the media, civil as well as human rights abuses in the breakaway Chechnya region, and the arrest of businessman Mikhail Khodorkovskiy as an apparent warning to other entrepreneurs not to support opposition parties or otherwise challenge government policy. Following terrorist attacks in Russia that culminated in the deaths of hundreds of school-children in the town of Beslan, President Putin on September 13, 2004, proposed restructuring all three branches of government and strengthening federal powers to better counter the terrorist threat to Russia. The proposed restructuring included integrating security agencies, switching to party list voting for the Duma (lower legislative chamber), eliminating direct elections of the heads of federal subunits, asserting greater presidential control over the judiciary, and mobilizing social support for the government by strengthening political parties and eliciting the views of non-governmental organizations.
    [Show full text]