DOCSLIB.ORG

Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Is left/right still the ‘super glue’? The role of left/right ideology and issues in electoral politics in Western and East Central Europe Walczak, A. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Walczak, A. (2012). Is left/right still the ‘super glue’? The role of left/right ideology and issues in electoral politics in Western and East Central Europe. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 Appendices 113 .3 .3 R² R² .27 .27 .37 .37 .33 .35 .35 .33 .35 .35 .29 .29 n .3 .83 .32 .59 .46 .55 .45 .47 .26 EU 1.04) (-.12, (.14, .5) .5) (.14, (.1, .42) (.41, .76) (.23, .87) (.19, .72) (.21, .73) (.05, .55) (.48, 1.19) Integratio .2 .3 .86 .86 .27 .27 .12 .12 .22 .22 .27 .27 .34 .34 -.06 (.52, 1.2) (.13, .41) (.06, .34) (.06, .53) (.09, .54) (.15, .39) (-.51, .39) (-.09, .77) (-.13, .37) Decrease of Immigration Immigration age regression forvoters .2 of .58 .28 .23 .35 .24 .16 .48 .002 .002 (.2, .96) (.15, .8) (.04, .36) (.07, .49) (.04, .29) (-.41, .41) (-.08, .55) (-.19, .89) (-.46, .94) Immigrants Immigrants ountry were regressed on voters’ voters’ regressed on were ountry s, religion, education and age. 95% and age. education religion, s, (- (- (- .4 .67 .22 .14 .17 .34 .57 .05 .56 (.26, 1.07) (-.1, .4) .13, .23) (-.25, .6) (.09, .71) (.21, .93) (.24, .88) .001, .44) .044, .73) .65 .08 .28 .21 .56 .15 .46 .19 .28 (-.14, .7) (.04, .38) (.14, .78) (.02, .35) (-.09, .25) (-.07, .63) (-.14, .44) (.18, 1.11) (.023, 1.09)(.023, (- (- (- (- 2) 2) 7) 7) 7) 7) 9) 9) .34 .12 .29 .14 .69 .49 .17 .22 .53 .17 -.09 .07 .17 .11 .39 .11 (.35, 1.04) 1.02) (-.05, .14, .8 .03, .2 .18, .4 .05, .4 (.1, .4) (.1, .3) (.2, .9) (- .6 7) 7) .51 .39 .25 .65 .25 .72 .44 .005 (.19, .84) (.13, .65) (.05, .45) .007, .51) .51) .007, (.0004, .8 (-.38, .39) (.36, 1.09) (.26, 1.03) (.15, 1.05) .5 .11 .11 .22 .37 .37 .47 .47 .15 .07 .07 .56 .33 .33 114 (.08, .36) (.11, .62) (.14, .79) (.28, .84) (.15, .84) (-.11, .35) (-.06, .37) (-.08, .21) (-.06, .72) Marriage Abortion Order Order Authority Marriage Abortion Family Adaptation (- .3 on on .39 .39 .17 .17 .47 .21 .21 .53 .35 .35 .36 .43 (.24, .54) .54) (.24, (.14, .79) .79) (.14, .49) (.11, (.18, .51) .51) (.18, .69) (.03, .79) (.28, (.03, .83) .83) (.03, (-.24, .58) .00003, .41) .41) .00003, is analysis, propensities analysis, to vote for c in is political each parties .34 .44 .42 .76 .49 .64 .38 .18 .72 (.1, .58) (.03, .84) (.14, .82) (.33, .96) (-.13, .97) (-.02, .77) (.38, 1.14) (.003, .35) (.19, 1.24) .4 .31 .35 .31 .42 .33 .34 .46 .47 (.02, .6) (.17, .53) (.13, .67) (.07, .55) (.26, .58) (.08, .58) (.15, .53) (.25, .68) (.07, .87) .18 .18 .41 .38 .34 .45 .15 .16 .16 .68 .46 (.11, .71) (.04, .71) (.22, .47) (.12, .79) (.28, .63) (-.14, .51) (-.02, .33) (.015, .31) (.23, 1.12) Enterprise Ownership Intervention Redistributi -.4 -.4 -.37 -.45 -.29 -.46 -.53 -.37 -.46 -.53 .26 .28 .43 -.14 .37 .16 (-.6, -.3) Distance Distance (-.43, -.3) (-.43, -.3) (-.5, -.41) (-.46, -.28) -.28) (-.46, -.23) (-.34, -.39) (-.52, -.47) (-.59, (-.44, -.35) -.35) (-.44, -.34) (-.46, I Full Results andof withHigh the First-Stage Low Level of for Voters Analysis Sophistication 1) (Chapter Country LR PPENDIX distance to political parties in left/right terms and on voters’ attitudes towards 12 issues, attitudes clas controlledon andby voters’ social gender, parties to politicaldistanceterms inleft/right confidence intervals are providedinbrackets. High Sophistication A Austria Belgium Flanders Belgium Wallonia Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Tables below show coefficients and distance theunstandardized of left/right 12 issues which have been obtainedthe first-st in th In sophistication. political level of low a high and with a .3 R² R² .35 .35 .35 .35 .34 .34 .37 .26 .22 .22 .27 .32 .29 .29 .35 .33 .33 .23 .23 n (- .21 .33 .53 .89 .23 .63 .29 .62 .74 .49 .46 .41 .57 EU (.3, .95) .9) (.33, (-.11, .7) (.18, .89) (.11, .87) (.19, .74) (.21, .61) (.21, .93) .005, .67) (-.04, .47) (-.03, .49) (.31, 1.17) (.53, 1.24) Integratio .4 .1 .6 .4 5, .27) (-.19, .42) .28 .28 .37 .37 .32 .35 .35 .22 .11 .11 .11 .64 .64 .17 .17 (-.1, .33) (.05, .51) (.15, .65) (.07, .67) (.27, .92) (.23, .57) (-.07, .72) (-.08, .28) (-.05, .75) (-.21, .66) (-.21, .45) (-.17, .52) (.26, 1.02) Decrease of Immigration Immigration of .19 .16 .07 .79 .21 .42 .32 .14 .42 .08 .64 .48 -.11 (-.2, .48) (.01, .62) (.03, .81) (.11, .85) (-.07, .46) (-.21, .54) (-.33, .47) (-.09, .95) (-.13, .31) (-.29, .08) (.45, 1,.13) (-.18, 1.48) 1.48) (-.18, -.0001, .42) Immigrants Immigrants (- (- (- (- (- (- (- (- .25 .18 .36 .31 .13 .41 .67 .02 .29 .36 .15 .63 -.04 (.22, (.27, 1.12) 1.00) .01, .52) .17, .53) .07, .79) .04, .66) .12, .38) .42, .46) .11, .41) .68, .61) (-.11, .7) (.04, .77) (.08, .64) 6) (-.2, .34) (-.05, .27) (-.0 .34) (-.05, 6) (-.2, .6 .14 .11 .22 .22 .55 .68 .68 .51 .13 .23 .34 -.08 (.22, .89) (.3, 1.05) (.19, .83) (.04, .43) (-.19, .42) (-.07, .51) (-.39, .83) (-.29, .13) (-.05, .31) (.35, 1.01) (.-.09, .38) (-.04, 1.23) (-.004, .68) ) (- (- (- (- (- (- (- (- 7) 7) 4) 5) 1) 5) 5) 2) 2) .31 .23 .39 .06 .53 .06 .26 .03 .87 .05 .11 .25 .63 61) 61) 86) 86) 43) 43) (.01, (.29, (.21, 1.45) 1.04) (.19, . .5, .5) (.06, . .02, .4 .05, .8 .33, .4 .27, .4 .1, .62 .28, .3 .09, .3 .5 .4 .1 .49 .34 .42 .54 .44 .31 .38 .47 .23 .36 (.2, .81) .81) (.2, (.03, .7) .7) (.03, (-.39, .6) (.24, .73) (.02, .67) (.09, .75) (.19, .88) (.19, .69) (.11, .51) (.12, .64) (.19, .75) (.06, .39) (-.3, 1.11) .31) (-.49, .2) (-.1, 3) (-.35, .1 (- .15 .15 .38 .38 .22 .22 .24 .24 .28 .23 .57 .57 .36 .23 .23 .24 .28 -.006 -.006 1.007 1.007 (.11, .6) 115 (.41, 1.6) (.05, .41) (.19, .92) (.06, .41) .064, .63) (-.02, .32) (-.24, .23) (-.19, .67) (-.07, .54) (-.08, .65) Marriage Abortion Order Order Authority Marriage Abortion Family Adaptation (.003, .76) (.005, .44) on on .41 .41 .54 .45 .45 .49 .65 .41 .54 .54 .23 .36 .56 .61 .63 .35 (.2, .6) (.16, .92) .92) (.16, (.28, .63) .63) (.28, (.19, .79) .79) (.19, .72) (.09, (.07, .66) .66) (.07, .83) (.29, (.29, .79) .79) (.29, .77) (.48, (.003, .7) (-.12, .59) (.16, 1.13) (.18, 1.03) .78 .32 .65 .13 .41 .65 .37 .24 .41 .49 .65 .52 1.004 1.004 (.03, .8) (-.1, .37) (.32, .97) (.41, 1.6) (.07, .74) (.08, .66) (.06, .91) (-.09, .73) (-.35, .84) (.34, 1.22) (.26, 1.04) (.27, 1.03) (-.11, 1.15) 1.15) (-.11, .4 .33 .31 .31 .33 .28 .21 .26 .56 .22 .48 .27 .48 (.11, .54) (.06, .73) (.03, .59) (.13, .53) (.03, .54) (.21, .75) (.02, .52) (.09, .86) (-.09, .72) (-.12, .54) (-.06, .59) (-.08, .53) (.11, 1.01) (- .5 .5 .39 .39 .31 .06 .25 .52 .36 .24 .46 .42 .48 .18 .18 (.2, .83) (.24, .54) (.02, .59) (.03, .44) (.09, .84) (.18, .67) (.08, .89) (.18, .83) (.16, .84) (-.15, .27) (-.09, .59) (-.18, .92) .0003, .35) Enterprise Ownership Intervention Redistributi -.6 -.43 -.47 -.43 -.46 -.34 -.23 -.56 -.33 -.49 -.27 -.56 -.24 (-.51,-.4) (-.51,-.4) Distance Distance (-.6, -.47) (.08, .44) (.09, .47) (.001, .86) (.19, .55) (.01, (-.34, -.2) (-.34, -.2) (-.62, -.5) (-.4,, -.28) (-.49, -.37) -.37) (-.49, -.43) (-.52, -.36) (-.49, -.17) (-.29, -.51) (-.62, -.23) (-.43, -.44) (-.53, -.16) (-.32, (-.67, -.54) -.54) (-.67, Country LR Germany Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania R² R² R² .41 .41 .28 .32 .32 .28 .32 .32 .28 .47 .25 .25 .19 .28 .28 .25 .25 n n .35 .55 .51 .43 .39 .78 .41 .37 .48 .68 .56 EU EU (.79) (.2, .93) (.18, .52) (.25, .85) (.29, .58) (.11, .67) (.15, .67) (.12, .84) (-.04, .78) (.39, 1.18) (.32, 1.04) Integratio Integratio .3 .23 .23 .41 .07 .15 .15 .08 .19 .68 .16 .16 .66 .92 .92 (.21, .6) (.01, .45) (.04, .56) (.37, .98) (-.32, .46) (-.06, .35) (-.08, .25) (-.18, .56) (-.23, .55) (.21, 1.11) (.59, 1.26) Decrease of Decrease of Immigration Immigration Immigration of of .17 .14 .47 .65 .21 .06 .42 .72 .47 .09 .45 (.01, .82) (.05, .89) (.03, .88) (-.11, .45) (-.03, .31) (-.05, .47) (-.12, .26) (-.48, .66) (.001, .95) (.35, 1.09) (.29, 1.007) Immigrants Immigrants Immigrants (- .4 .41 .34 .26 .36 .59 .59 .39 .39 .51 .04 .46 .46 -.04 .29, .21) (.15, .66) (.05, .63) (.08, .44) (.04, .68) (.05, .76) (.05, (.07, 1.1) (.03, .76) (.03, .98) (.05, (.08, .83) (.08, (-.42, .51) .21 .09 .45 .17 .18 .41 .53 .43 .34 .06 .72 (.05, .85) (.06, .76) (.08, .98) (.08, .77) (-.05, .47) (-.11, .29) (-.07, .41) (-.02, .38) (-.31, .44) (.003, .68) (.42, 1.03) (- (- (- (- (- 2) 2) 6) 6) 7) 9) 9) .32 .25 .08 .35 .37 .56 .27 .11 .25 .84 51) 51) 45) 96) 46) 46) 1.08 1.08 (.48, (.33, 1.67) 1.35) (.13, .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulgaria – the Difficult “Return to Europe”
    European Democracy in Action BULGARIA – THE DIFFICULT “RETURN TO EUROPE” TAMARA BUSCHEK Against the background of the EU accession of Bulgaria on 1st January 2007 and the first Bulgarian elections for the European Parliament on 20th May 2007, Tamara Buschek takes a closer look at Bulgaria’s uneven political and economic transition – at its difficult “return to Europe”. Graduated from Graz University (Austria) in 2003 with a Masters in Law [magistra juris] after finishing her studies in European and international law. After gaining a grant from the Chamber of Commerce in 2000 to complete an internship at the Austrian Embassy in London, she carried out research for her dissertation in criminal law – “The Prevention of Sexual Child Abuse – Austria/Great Britain” - in 2001 at the London School of Economics. She studied European and administrative law in Paris from 2001 to 2002 as part of an Erasmus year. She is quadrilingual (German, Bulgarian, English and French). « BULGARIA – THE DIFFICULT RETURN TO EUROPE » MAY 2007 Table of Contents Introduction P. 1 2.3 The current governmental coalition, 2005-2007 and the P. 21 presidential election in 2006 I – Background Information P. 3 III - The first European Parliament elections, 20 May 2007 P. 25 1.1 Hopes and Fears P. 3 Conclusion P. 30 1.2 Ethnic Minorities P. 5 1.3 Economic Facts P. 7 Annex P. 32 II – Political Situation- a difficult path towards stability P. 9 Annex 1: Key facts P. 32 2.1 The transition from 1989 till 2001 P. 9 Annex 2: Economic Profile P. 33 2.1.1 The legislative elections of 1990 and the first P.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distinctiveness of Party Families
    On the Distinctiveness of Party Families Martin El E-mail: [email protected] Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenscha Postbox D¥ Universitätsstraße Ôý Þ¥ Þ Konstanz Germany Prepared for delivery at the ÞÔth Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, April ÔÔ-Ô¥, òýÔç Abstract e concept of party families has been a useful tool for the comparison and analysis of party systems in European democracies. Central to the concept is that parties maintain an identity as member in one of the “familles spirituelles” due to their heritage from the great ideological movements of the ÔÀth and early òýth century. It is oen presumed that in a post-ideological age, party families may become obsolete. But whether this empirically is the case remains an open question. is paper examines the political distinctiveness of party families in European politics aer ÔÀ¥ . Using a novel approach at analyzing party manifesto data it overcomes the restrictions imposed on the such analysis by the assumption of one or two ideological “super- issue” dimensions. As a consequence it is possible to establish the distinction e.g. between party families such as the christian democrats and the conservatives, which oen are lumped together into a single category of “center-right” parties. Ô Ô Introduction Party families are a common notion used to describe party competition in Europe, a notion that is one of the “standard items” on the comparative politics of Europe and on party politics (see e.g. Newton and van Deth òýý ; Mény and Knapp ÔÀÀ; Bale òýý; Gallagher et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • PIREDEU EES 2009 Voter Study Advance Release Notes Marcel H. Van Egmond Eliyahu V. Sapir Wouter Van Der Brug Sara B. Hobolt Mark
    PIREDEU EES 2009 Voter Study Advance Release Notes Marcel H. van Egmond Eliyahu V. Sapir Wouter van der Brug Sara B. Hobolt Mark N. Franklin Original release 7 April 2010 Documentation adjusted 30 June 2010 University of Amsterdam 2 Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing both the data and the accompanying release document. How to cite this data: EES (2009), European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study, Advance Release, 7/4/2010, (www.piredeu.eu). How to cite this document: Marcel H. van Egmond, Eliyahu V. Sapir, Wouter van der Brug, Sara B. Hobolt, Mark N. Franklin (2010) EES 2009 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam 3 Acknowledgement of assistance The 2009 EES voter study would not have been possible without the help of many colleagues, both members of the PIREDEU team and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and data, often at very short notice. We would like to acknowledge their work here and thank them warmly, for without their assistance the EES 2009 would certainly be of lesser quality. Aleksandrs Aleksandrovs Maria Spirova Algis Krupavicius Mariano Torcal Andreas Wüst Marina Costa Lobo Astrid Spreitzer Marina Popescu Aurelian Muntean Markus Quandt Bambos Papageorgiou Michael Marsh Bernhard Weßels Mikko Mattila Bruno Cautres Mikołaj Cześnik Cees van der Eijk Oana Lup Daniela Braun Olga Gyrafasova Dominic Fenech Patrick Dumont Eduard Bonet Pedro Magalhães Eftichia Teperoglou Pierre Baudewyns Gábor Tóka Piret Ehin Georgios Xezonakis Radoslaw Markowski Heiko Giebler Roberto Biorcio Henrik Oscarsson Ruud Luijkx Hermann Schmitt Sally Widdop Jacques Thomassen Silke Schneider James Tilly Simona Rajšp Jill Wittrock Soren Holmberg Kasper Møller Hansen Susan Banducci Levi Littvay Sylvia Kritzinger Lieven de Winter Tapio Raunio Lukas Linek Till Weber Marc Swyngedouw 4 Introduction The Advance Release Notes accompany the Advance Release of the 2009 EES Voter Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Testamento Biologico
    CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE FORENSE PRESSO IL MINISTERO DELLA GIUSTIZIA *** RASSEGNA STAMPA 27 marzo 2009 Titoli dei quotidiani Professioni Sole 24 Ore Se l’autoriforma degli Ordini è più liberista della legge quadro Italia Oggi I difensori civici guardano alla class action Italia Oggi Calderone succede a Sirica alla presidenza del Cup Italia Oggi La crisi morde gli studi di settore Italia Oggi Iva per cassa, meccanismo a tempo Giustizia Sole 24 Ore In Italia giudizi ancora a rilento Repubblica Affossato il testamento biologico Repubblica Alta tensione nel Pd, ma solo due si sfilano Repubblica George Orwell a Palazzo Madama Corsera “Biotestamento non vincolante”. Il Senato vota sì tra le polemiche Corsera Da Pera a Saro: la pattuglia dei dissidenti agita il Pdl Corsera I radicali: soccorso civile per staccare il sondino Messaggero Primo sì al biotestamento, ma non sarà vincolante Messaggero Ma sul referendum il Pd t6eme la trappola Messaggero Processi lenti, nuovo richiamo del Consiglio d’Europa FLASH Consiglio Nazionale Forense - via del Governo Vecchio, 3 - 00186 Roma - tel. 0039.06.977488 - fax. 0039.06.97748829 - *** Professioni Liberalizzazioni Giuseppe De Rita, Il Sole 24 Ore 27/3/09 pag 15 Se l’autoriforma degli Ordini è più liberista della legge quadro Sono anni che assito alla determinata intenzione dell’Autorità Antitrust di liberalizzare il mondo delle professioni, considerato troppo chiuso in se stesso e restio ad aprirsi a innovazione sia di struttura sia di comportamento. Tutto inizio con la forte spinta esercitata da Giuliano Amato quando ne era presidente, con i decisivo supporto del’intelligenza anche politica del collega Militello; la parabola si è conclusa con il recente documento di ―istruttoria‖ dell’Autorità oggi in carica.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottobre 2013  Catania (Provincia),  Pagina 33
    Venerdì 04 Ottobre 2013 Catania (Provincia), pagina 33 Oggi si proietta «Generale» s. c.) Sarà proiettato oggi alle ore 18.30, nello Stabilimento di Monaco a Misterbianco, il docufilm "Generale". L'iniziativa promossa dal Presidio Libera di Misterbianco con il patrocinio dello stesso comune e l'assessorato alla Cultura Barbara Bruno, descriverà e mostrerà documenti inediti sulla vita di Carlo Alberto Dalla Chiesa. A raccontare alcuni momenti di vita del vicecomandante generale dell'Arma dei Carabinieri, per la prima volta, la nipote Dora. Parteciperanno l'on. Giuseppe Berretta, il procuratore della Repubblica di Siracusa Francesco Paolo Giordano, il coordinatore di Libera Sicilia Umberto di Maggio ed il giornalista Rai Sicilia Guglielmo Troina. CORRIERE DEL MEZZOGIORNO EDIZIONE BARI Tagli tribunali, Tar conferma la sede di Bitonto non chiuderà Il sindaco e alcuni avvocati avevano promosso il ricorso contro il provvedimento del ministro BARI - Il Tar della Puglia ha confermato la sospensione dell'esecuzione in via cautelare del decreto che dispone la chiusura della sezione distaccata di Bitonto del tribunale di Bari e ha fissato per il 13 febbraio 2014 l'udienza di merito. Ne dà notizia il Comune di Bitonto. Il sindaco della città e gli avvocati bitontini che hanno promosso il ricorso contro il provvedimento del ministro Cancellieri esprimono «cauto ottimismo» alla luce dell'ordinanza del Tar, visto che «i giudici amministrativi - sostengono - hanno riconosciuto la fondatezza delle nostre ragioni, evidenziando anche alcune gravi lacune procedurali da parte del Ministero, che hanno determinato la scelta di una sede inadeguata (Modugno) a scapito del Tribunale di Bitonto più moderno e funzionale.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlusconi-Lega, Il Patto Del Nord Con Air France ` Maroni Corre in Lombardia
    -MSGR - 14 PESARO - 1 - 08/01/13-N: ANNO 135- N˚ 7 €1,00* ITALIA Pesaro Sped. Abb. Post. legge 662/85 art.2/19 Roma Martedì 8 Gennaio 2013 • S. Massimo di Pavia IL GIORNALE DEL MATTINO Commenta le notizie su ILMESSAGGERO.IT Porcellane L’estrazione Cinema “ Ogni giorno hai un’ottima ragione Richard Ginori, Lotteria Italia Divi e successi per seguirci on line.“ il fallimento ecco tutti l’India festeggia Anzi, dieci. dopo tre secoli i 126 numeri i cent’anni di storia vincenti di Bollywood Cirillo a pag. 13 A pag. 13 Marino a pag. 19 Vai su ilmessaggero.it! Vendita Alitalia sfida sul prezzo Berlusconi-Lega, il patto del Nord con Air France ` Maroni corre in Lombardia. Il Cavaliere: io leader, Alfano premier. No del Carroccio: meglio Tremonti ROMA È sfida sul prezzo nella trattativa tra Alitalia e Air `Lista Monti, vertice sulle quote. Bersani arruola Galli (Confindustria). Vendola contro i super-ricchi France, ma la cordata italia- na cerca alternative. A frena- re sono alcuni dei soci italia- ROMA Accordo Pdl-Lega, Silvio Le liste ni più piccoli, tra i quali il L’analisi Berlusconi fa un passo indietro: Il selezionatore fondo Equinox. Ieri c’è stata io leader, Alfano candidato pre- Senato, si cambia una lunga riunione per stu- mier. Ma subito arriva la precisa- Bondi si dimette: dai tagli ai candidati diare una possibile alternati- Tasse trattenute zione di Roberto Maroni, che nomi di frontiera va o comunque per mettere correrà per la Regione Lombar- un po’ in apprensione il co- egoismo padano dia: il candidato alla presidenza Enrico Bondi lascia l’incarico per i seggi chiave losso transalpino, che forse è del Consiglio per noi è Tremonti.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting" À La Carte": Electoral Support for the Radical Right in the 2005
    www.ssoar.info Voting "à la carte": Electoral Support for the Radical Right in the 2005 Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections Stefanova, Boyka Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Stefanova, B. (2006). Voting "à la carte": Electoral Support for the Radical Right in the 2005 Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections. Politics in Central Europe, 2(2), 38-70. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63664 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Political Parties
    Manifesto Project Dataset Political Parties in the Manifesto Project Dataset [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2015a from May 22, 2015 Manifesto Project Dataset Political Parties in the Manifesto Project Dataset Version 2015a 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The following list documents the parties that were coded at a specific election. The list includes the party’s or alliance’s name in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation as well as the corresponding party identification number. In case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list by themselves. If the composition of an alliance changed between different elections, this change is covered as well. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party was a split from another party or a merger of a number of other parties and indicates the name (and if existing the id) of this split or merger parties. In the past there have been a few cases where an alliance manifesto was coded instead of a party manifesto but without assigning the alliance a new party id. Instead, the alliance manifesto appeared under the party id of the main party within that alliance. In such cases the list displays the information for which election an alliance manifesto was coded as well as the name and members of this alliance. 1.1 Albania ID Covering Abbrev Parties No.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS6 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS6 - 2012 ed. 2.1 Albania 2 Belgium 3 Bulgaria 6 Cyprus 10 Czechia 11 Denmark 13 Estonia 14 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Israel 27 Italy 29 Kosovo 31 Lithuania 33 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 43 Russian Federation 45 Slovakia 47 Slovenia 48 Spain 49 Sweden 52 Switzerland 53 Ukraine 56 United Kingdom 57 Albania 1. Political parties Language used in data file: Albanian Year of last election: 2009 Official party names, English 1. Partia Socialiste e Shqipërisë (PS) - The Socialist Party of Albania - 40,85 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Partia Demokratike e Shqipërisë (PD) - The Democratic Party of Albania - 40,18 % election: 3. Lëvizja Socialiste për Integrim (LSI) - The Socialist Movement for Integration - 4,85 % 4. Partia Republikane e Shqipërisë (PR) - The Republican Party of Albania - 2,11 % 5. Partia Socialdemokrate e Shqipërisë (PSD) - The Social Democratic Party of Albania - 1,76 % 6. Partia Drejtësi, Integrim dhe Unitet (PDIU) - The Party for Justice, Integration and Unity - 0,95 % 7. Partia Bashkimi për të Drejtat e Njeriut (PBDNJ) - The Unity for Human Rights Party - 1,19 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Socialist Party of Albania (Albanian: Partia Socialiste e Shqipërisë), is a social- above democratic political party in Albania; it is the leading opposition party in Albania. It seated 66 MPs in the 2009 Albanian parliament (out of a total of 140). It achieved power in 1997 after a political crisis and governmental realignment. In the 2001 General Election it secured 73 seats in the Parliament, which enabled it to form the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salience of European Integration to Party Competition: Western And
    EEPXXX10.1177/0888325414567128East European Politics and SocietiesWhitefield and Rohrschneider / Salience of European Integration 567128research-article2015 East European Politics and Societies and Cultures Volume XX Number X Month 201X 1 –28 © 2015 SAGE Publications The Salience of European 10.1177/0888325414567128 http://eeps.sagepub.com hosted at Integration to Party http://online.sagepub.com Competition: Western and Eastern Europe Compared Stephen Whitefield Department of Politics and International Relations and Pembroke College, Oxford University Robert Rohrschneider Department of Political Science, The University of Kansas This article seeks to contribute to the burgeoning literature on how parties assign sali- ence to their issue stances. With regard to European integration, recent research has pointed not only to growing public Euro-scepticism but also to an increase in the importance that the public assigns to European issues. But are parties matching this shift with appropriate salience shifts of their own? The existing literature points to important constraints on parties achieving such salience representation that arise from the nature of inherited issue ownership and the nature of political cleavages. There are also reasons to expect important differences between Western European and Central European parties in the extent to which such constraints apply. We investigate these issues using data from expert surveys conducted in twenty-four European countries at two time points, 2007–2008 and 2013, that provide measures of the salience of European integration to parties along with other indicators that are used as predictors of salience. The results do not suggest that CEE parties assign salience in ways that differ substantially from their counterparts in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the European People's Party After the Integration of Parties from Western and Eastern Europe. Lessons to B
    Πανεπιστήμιο Μακεδονίας Τμήμα Βαλκανικών, Σλαβικών και Ανατολικών Σπουδών « The evolution of the European People’s Party after the integration of parties from Western and Eastern Europe. Lessons to be learned for European Integration and the development of Europarties » Διδακτορική Διατριβή Μιχαήλ Β. Πεγκλή Επιβλέποντες καθηγητές ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΜΑΡΑΝΤΖΙΔΗΣ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΒΑΛΗΝΑΚΗΣ ΓΕΡΑΣΣΙΜΟΣ ΜΟΣΧΟΝΑΣ ΙΟΥΝΙΟΣ 2016 1 2 Table of Contents Εισαγωγικό σημείωμα ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Presentation of the topic .................................................................................................................... 9 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 1: History ................................................................................................................................... 21 The European Union of Christian Democrats ......................................................................... 35 Chapter 2: the creation of the EPP ................................................................................................... 40 The ‘linear’ approach ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]