DOCSLIB.ORG

Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Introduction Navigation is determining where you are and how to get where you're going. Navigation tools help you travel from one place to another efficiently and safely. Early sea navigation depended upon a mariner's ability to determine latitude by observing the height of the sun in daylight and the North Star and major constellations at night. Such observations were not exact and could be unreliable. Beginning in the 13th century, advancements in navigational tools and scientific methods made navigation more exact and travel by ship safer; however, by the early 18th century, ships still lost their way frequently, with sometimes disastrous results. In this problem- based lesson, students read about the Scilly disaster of 1707, determine its causes, and then choose and explain which navigational tools might have prevented the disaster. Objectives In this lesson, students: • identify the cause(s) of the Scilly naval disaster of 1707 • place the development of navigational tools in chronological order • problem-solve to figure out what navigational tools could have prevented the Scilly disaster • use their knowledge of navigational tools to answer the question “How did mariners use navigational tools to solve the challenges of early oceanic travel?” Materials • Navigational Tools Graphic Organizer • Scilly Naval Disaster of 1707 • Timeline of the Development of Navigational Tools • Navigational Tools Cards • scissors • tape © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 1 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Strategy 1. Ask students to think about the kinds of tools we have today to help us find our way when traveling. As students share their ideas, record them on the board or document camera. 2. Remind students that before the air travel was invented, the only way to travel between continents was by ship. In collaborative student groups, ask students to brainstorm the challenges or problems of navigating across the oceans. Students record their thoughts in Column 1 on the Navigational Tools Graphic Organizer. Ask students to share ideas while someone records student ideas on the board. 3. Explain that navigational tools evolved over time to make transoceanic travel safer and more exact. Pass out the Navigational Tools Timeline to students and read through the timeline. Explain that navigational tools improved over time, and that problems with some tools led to the development of other tools. 4. Distribute the Navigational Tools Cards and read through them with the students, answering any questions they may have about the tools. Make sure students have a clear understanding of each tool and how it worked to make sea travel safer and more exact. 5. Have students cut out the Navigational Tools Cards and tape them together in chronological order of their development, left to right. 6. Give each student a copy of the account of the Scilly Naval Disaster of 1707, and read the account aloud while students follow along. Alternatively, you can call on students to read aloud a paragraph at a time, or employ the "popcorn" reading method. 7. Place students in collaborative groups and ask them to read through the account a second time and identify the cause(s) of the disaster. You may want to have students underline and/or highlight the causes as they find them. Have students record the causes in Column 2 of the Navigational Tools Graphic Organizer. 8. Using the Navigational Tool Cards, ask students to find tools that might help solve the problem(s) that caused the naval disaster. They should record the tools in Column 3 on the Navigational Tools Graphic Organizer. Answers must include explanation of how the tools would help solve the problems. 9. After students have recorded their ideas onto their graphic organizer, ask students to share answers with the class. The other students should add ideas to their lists. Record student ideas on the board. 10. To conclude this lesson, ask students to write an academic summary in response to the question, “How did mariners use navigational tools to solve the challenges/problems of early transoceanic travel?” Students should provide 2-3 pieces of evidence to support their answers. Lesson Extensions 1. Students can research the navigational tools mariners use today, and compare them to what mariners in the 18th century used. How are they similar? If they are similar, have they changed over time? How are they different? © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 2 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas 2. Have students make a quadrant (there are several websites that provide directions). Hang a Styrofoam ball from the ceiling, then have students use the quadrant to find their latitude. Then turn off the lights and ask students to try and find their latitude. Discuss the trouble you had finding latitude at night when sailing under a cloudy sky, and relate that to the difficulty mariners might have had sailing under those conditions. This lesson was written by Colonial Williamsburg Master Teacher Tracy Middleton, San Marcos, CA, for the October 2014 Teacher Gazette. © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 3 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas SCILLY NAVAL DISASTER OF 1707 The Isles of Scilly, a small group of islands (some only the size of large rocks) just off England’s west coast, was the site of one of the Royal Navy’s worst maritime disasters. A British fleet of 21 ships, under the command of Admiral Sir Clowdesley Shovell, was headed home to Portsmouth from duty in the Mediterranean Sea as a part of the War of Spanish Succession. “It was a dark and stormy night” describes the evening of October 22, 1707. The British fleet had been sailing in foggy and rainy weather since leaving Gibraltar, making navigation difficult. In the 1700s, navigation at sea was an inexact science. Longitude was determined by “dead reckoning,” which is determining location based on how far you’ve travelled from your last known location based on landmarks or the stars. The bad weather compounded the problem by limiting visibility and blowing the ships off course. Shovell called a conference of the ships’ masters to determine the fleet’s exact location. The consensus of the sailing masters was that the ships were close to Ushant, France. Only one master disagreed, stating that they were nearer the Isles of Scilly. Shovell, believing that he was at Ushant, headed west, thinking he was headed into the English Channel toward Portsmouth. Unfortunately, he was many miles further west and north than the inexact calculations predicted—near to the Isles of Scilly. His flagship, the Association, ran aground on the westernmost part of the Scilly Isles. By all accounts, the Association sank rapidly, quickly followed by the Eagle and the Rumney, losing all men on board. The Firebrand sank shortly thereafter. Various accounts of the event list the number of sailors lost between 1,400 and over 2,000. At that time, few sailors could swim. Various logs and journals from other vessels in the fleet show that it was miraculous that no other boats wrecked. The remainder of the fleet made it to Portsmouth on October 25, 1707. Oct. 23. At 6 Sir Cloudesley Shovel made ye signal to wear, at the same time we all made saile, hauling up E. [east] by S. [south], E.S.E. [east southeast] and S.E. [southeast] At ½ past 7 fell in with ye islands of Scilly; the Genll fired one gun, as we plainly saw, and immediately lost sight of him; then Rear Admiral Noris fired four guns, hoisted several lights and wore, and put all his lights out, at ye same time made the light on St Mary's under our lee bow. At 7 a.m. (on 23rd) saw seaven saile wch I judg'd to be some of ye separated fleet. The Shipwreck of Sir Cloudesley Shovell, on the Scilly Islands in 1707. From Original and Contemporary Documents Hitherto Unpublished (Read at a Meeting of the Society of Antiquaries, London, Feb. 1, 1883) By James Herbert Cooke, F.S.A. The Scilly naval disaster in 1707 prompted the British Parliament to pass the Longitude Act in 1714. It included the Longitude Prize, which offered £20,000 to anyone who invented an accurate method of determining longitude at sea. Sir Isaac Newton helped write the Act, including a list of methods of finding longitude that had already been tried but were not effective. © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 4 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Navigational Tools Chart What challenges are there to What problems did the fleet What navigational tools could finding where you are in the encounter on its voyage in have helped them? How? middle of the ocean? 1707? Answer the following question in the box below. How did mariners use navigational tools to solve the challenges/problems of early transoceanic travel? Be sure to include 2-3 pieces of evidence to support your thesis, and write in complete sentences. © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 5 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Timeline of Navigational Tools and Legislation 13th Century • portolan charts • first documented use of astrolabe for sea travel 15th Century • quadrant • logbooks 16th Century • chip log • traverse board • back-staff • cross-staff (first recorded date of use – 1514) 18th Century • Longitude Act passed in Britain • logbooks used as official documents • marine chronometer © 2015 The Colonial  ƒoundation 6 Save Our Ships! Navigation on the High Seas Navigational Tool Cards Mariners’ Museum images and more information can be found at http://ageofex.marinersmuseum.org Navigational Tool: portolan charts—navigational Navigational Tool: astrolabe—an angle- maps based on compass directions and estimated measuring device for measuring the sun and stars distances observed by mariners in the areas of astronomy and astrology, later adopted for use at sea Purpose: useful near the shorelines to identify and go to or avoid coastal features and ports Purpose: measures the angular heights of the sun [Portolan atlas of the Mediterranean Sea, western Europe, and the northwest coast of Africa].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:43:06AM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Maritime Navigation Unit Plan
    EARLY MARITIME NAVIGATION UNIT PLAN Compelling How did advances in marine navigation, from the 13th century C.E. through the 18th century Question C.E., help to catapult Western Europe into global preeminence? C3 Historical Thinking Standards – D2.His.1.9-12. Evaluate how historical events and developments were shaped by unique circumstances of time and place as well as broader historical contexts. Standards C3 Historical Thinking Standards – D2.His.2.9-12. and Analyze change and continuity in historical eras. Practices Common Core Content Standards – CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.1.B Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form and in a manner that anticipates the audience's knowledge level and concerns. Staging the How do advances in marine navigation technology help nations develop and sustain world Question influence? Supporting Supporting Supporting Supporting Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Why has the sea been What is navigation and How does being posed How did STEM confer crucial to the fate of what special challenges with a challenge lead us to advantages to a society’s nations, empires, and does the sea pose to innovation and progress? ability to navigate the civilizations? travelers? world’s oceans? Formative Formative Formative Formative Performance Task 1 Performance Task 2 Performance Task 3 Performance Task 4 1) Look at the planet’s 1) In pairs ask your 1) Compass Lesson Plan 1) Drawing connections to physical geography, partner to draw you a (Lesson is located below the last three questions, all the Print Documents) build an argument that map from school to a view the Longitude video the sea was better at specific location in your Discover how the (07:05 min) connecting cultures town.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:24:08PM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 05:14:25AM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76518-3 — the Making of the Modern Admiralty C
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76518-3 — The Making of the Modern Admiralty C. I. Hamilton Index More Information Index Accountant-General, 60; of the Navy Arbuthnot, Charles, 97–8 (from 1832): 65, 125, 138, 146, Army Staff, 222 189–93, 295 (see also estimates); Arnold-Forster, H. O., 198, 217 staff, 164, 188, 192 Asquith, H. H., 224 administrative board, 31 Assistant Secretary for Finance Duties Admiralty (see also Admiralty Office; (see also Secretariat), 192 Board of Admiralty; Childers, H. C. E.; Aube, H.-L.-T., 172 First and Second (Permanent) Auckland, George Eden, Earl of, 119, 134 Secretaries; Geddes, E.; Goschen, Awdry, Richard, 191, 201, 205 George; Graham, Sir James; ‘mob from the North’; Naval Staff; Navy Bacon, Sir Reginald, (Kt. 1916), 215 Board; Navy Pay Office; Principal Baddeley, Vincent, (Kt. 1921), 205, 206, 259 Officers; Private Office; Victualling Balfour, A. J., 237, 238 Board; Secretariat; Sick and Hurt Ballard, G. A., 222, 223 Office; Sixpenny Office; Transport Bank of England, 28 Office; War Staff): administration/ Barham, Lord, see Middleton, Charles policy divide, 266–7, 275, 279, 288, Barnaby, Nathaniel (Kt. 1885), 136, 162, 307; attacks on, 312; civil–military 173, 194–5 division in (see also Godfrey, John), Barrow, John (cr. baronet, 1835) (see also 68–9, 279, 289, 297–302, 313, 314; Second Secretary): 6, 12, 52, 57, 63; committees, 110–11, 120–3, 186–9, administration and policy of, 41, 51, 215; communications, 176, 220, 64, 68–9, 75, 93, 100–1, 103, 152, 248–50; demobilisation, 274, 276; 163; and Benthamism, 54; and development, 2–3, 23, 234–6; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Hydrography
    MEMOIRS 07 HYDROGRAPHY INCLUDING Brief Biographies of the Principal Officers who have Served in H.M. NAVAL SURVEYING SERVICE BETWEEN THE YEARS 1750 and 1885 COMPILED BY COMMANDER L. S. DAWSON, R.N. I 1s t tw o PARTS. P a r t II.—1830 t o 1885. EASTBOURNE: HENRY W. KEAY, THE “ IMPERIAL LIBRARY.” iI i / PREF A CE. N the compilation of Part II. of the Memoirs of Hydrography, the endeavour has been to give the services of the many excellent surveying I officers of the late Indian Navy, equal prominence with those of the Royal Navy. Except in the geographical abridgment, under the heading of “ Progress of Martne Surveys” attached to the Memoirs of the various Hydrographers, the personal services of officers still on the Active List, and employed in the surveying service of the Royal Navy, have not been alluded to ; thereby the lines of official etiquette will not have been over-stepped. L. S. D. January , 1885. CONTENTS OF PART II ♦ CHAPTER I. Beaufort, Progress 1829 to 1854, Fitzroy, Belcher, Graves, Raper, Blackwood, Barrai, Arlett, Frazer, Owen Stanley, J. L. Stokes, Sulivan, Berard, Collinson, Lloyd, Otter, Kellett, La Place, Schubert, Haines,' Nolloth, Brock, Spratt, C. G. Robinson, Sheringham, Williams, Becher, Bate, Church, Powell, E. J. Bedford, Elwon, Ethersey, Carless, G. A. Bedford, James Wood, Wolfe, Balleny, Wilkes, W. Allen, Maury, Miles, Mooney, R. B. Beechey, P. Shortland, Yule, Lord, Burdwood, Dayman, Drury, Barrow, Christopher, John Wood, Harding, Kortright, Johnson, Du Petit Thouars, Lawrance, Klint, W. Smyth, Dunsterville, Cox, F. W. L. Thomas, Biddlecombe, Gordon, Bird Allen, Curtis, Edye, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hawke Locker and the Foundation of The
    EDWARD HAWKE LOCKER AND THE FOUNDATION OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF NAVAL ART (c. 1795-1845) CICELY ROBINSON TWO VOLUMES VOLUME II - ILLUSTRATIONS PhD UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART DECEMBER 2013 2 1. Canaletto, Greenwich Hospital from the North Bank of the Thames, c.1752-3, NMM BHC1827, Greenwich. Oil on canvas, 68.6 x 108.6 cm. 3 2. The Painted Hall, Greenwich Hospital. 4 3. John Scarlett Davis, The Painted Hall, Greenwich, 1830, NMM, Greenwich. Pencil and grey-blue wash, 14¾ x 16¾ in. (37.5 x 42.5 cm). 5 4. James Thornhill, The Main Hall Ceiling of the Painted Hall: King William and Queen Mary attended by Kingly Virtues. 6 5. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: King William and Queen Mary. 7 6. James Thornhill, Detail of the upper hall ceiling: Queen Anne and George, Prince of Denmark. 8 7. James Thornhill, Detail of the south wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of William III at Torbay. 9 8. James Thornhill, Detail of the north wall of the upper hall: The Arrival of George I at Greenwich. 10 9. James Thornhill, West Wall of the Upper Hall: George I receiving the sceptre, with Prince Frederick leaning on his knee, and the three young princesses. 11 10. James Thornhill, Detail of the west wall of the Upper Hall: Personification of Naval Victory 12 11. James Thornhill, Detail of the main hall ceiling: British man-of-war, flying the ensign, at the bottom and a captured Spanish galleon at top. 13 12. ‘The Painted Hall’ published in William Shoberl’s A Summer’s Day at Greenwich, (London, 1840) 14 13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre Wish You a Very Happy Christmas and a Prosperous New Year News and Events Odette Buchanan, Friends’ Secretary
    The Newsletter of the Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre Issue Number 12: November 2008 £2.00; free to members Christmas Number and Special issue to mark the 90th Anniversary of the World War One Armistice In memory of Frederick Charles Wellard, grandfather of the new FOMA Membership Secretary, Betty Cole. The wooden cross, pictured, is a rare image of how the war graves appeared before their replacement by the now familiar rows of white stone. Frederick was killed at Arras, France, in August 1917. The front line diary records, ‘16/8/17 Normal trench routine. Trenches deepened where necessary. Enemy active with pineapples. S. Major Wellard killed. C.Q.M.S. Blackstock wounded (afterwards died).’ Three days later the battalion was relieved. Fred left a widow and five young children, three of whom, including Betty’s mother, Ivy, were sent to orphanages. More of Frederick’s story can be read inside. The Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre wish you a very happy Christmas and a prosperous New Year News and Events Odette Buchanan, Friends’ Secretary At the 2008 FOMA AGM, it was decided that members should take on all the clerical responsibilities of the organisation, especially as we are all over the age of consent (some more so than others). In a moment of mental aberration I agreed to take on the role of Secretary. Aeons ago I had been paid to be the secretary to the Overseas Sales Director of a multi-national company and had had recent voluntary secretarial experience with another Friends group which I helped found.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for Longitude
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Press Contacts: Garland Scott, (202) 675-0342, [email protected] Esther French, (202) 675-0326, [email protected] Press Tour: Wednesday, March 18, 10:30 am Reservations requested, [email protected] New Exhibition—Ships, Clocks & Stars: The Quest for Longitude The solution to one of the greatest technical challenges of the eighteenth century Produced by the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London Proudly sponsored by United Technologies Corporation On exhibit March 19 – August 23, 2015 Washington, DC— For centuries, longitude (east-west position) was a matter of life and death at sea. Ships that went off course had no way to re-discover their longitude. With no known location, they might smash into underwater obstacles or be forever lost at sea. The award-winning exhibition, Ships, Clocks & Stars: The Quest for Longitude, produced by the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, London, celebrates the 300th anniversary of the British Longitude Act of 1714, which offered huge rewards for any practical way to determine longitude at sea. The longitude problem was so difficult that—despite that incentive—it took five decades to solve it. Through extraordinary, historic materials—many from the collection of the National Maritime Museum—the exhibition tells the story of the clockmakers, astronomers, naval officers, and others who pursued the long "quest for longitude" to ultimate success. John Harrison’s work in developing extremely advanced marine timekeepers, which was vital to finally solving the problem of longitude, took place against a backdrop of almost unprecedented collaboration and investment. Featured in this complex and fascinating history are the names of Galileo, Isaac Newton, Captain James Cook, and William Bligh of HMS Bounty.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Scilly
    Defending Scilly 46992_Text.indd 1 21/1/11 11:56:39 46992_Text.indd 2 21/1/11 11:56:56 Defending Scilly Mark Bowden and Allan Brodie 46992_Text.indd 3 21/1/11 11:57:03 Front cover Published by English Heritage, Kemble Drive, Swindon SN2 2GZ The incomplete Harry’s Walls of the www.english-heritage.org.uk early 1550s overlook the harbour and English Heritage is the Government’s statutory adviser on all aspects of the historic environment. St Mary’s Pool. In the distance on the © English Heritage 2011 hilltop is Star Castle with the earliest parts of the Garrison Walls on the Images (except as otherwise shown) © English Heritage.NMR hillside below. [DP085489] Maps on pages 95, 97 and the inside back cover are © Crown Copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019088. Inside front cover First published 2011 Woolpack Battery, the most heavily armed battery of the 1740s, commanded ISBN 978 1 84802 043 6 St Mary’s Sound. Its strategic location led to the installation of a Defence Product code 51530 Electric Light position in front of it in c 1900 and a pillbox was inserted into British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data the tip of the battery during the Second A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. World War. All rights reserved [NMR 26571/007] No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without Frontispiece permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationalizing the Royal Navy in Late Seventeenth-Century England
    The Ingenious Mr Dummer: Rationalizing the Royal Navy in Late Seventeenth-Century England Celina Fox In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Royal Navy constituted by far the greatest enterprise in the country. Naval operations in and around the royal dockyards dwarfed civilian industries on account of the capital investment required, running costs incurred and logistical problems encountered. Like most state services, the Navy was not famed as a model of efficiency and innovation. Its day-to-day running was in the hands of the Navy Board, while a small Admiralty Board secretariat dealt with discipline and strategy. The Navy Board was responsible for the industrial organization of the Navy including the six royal dockyards; the design, construction and repair of ships; and the supply of naval stores. In practice its systems more or less worked, although they were heavily dependent on personal relationships and there were endless opportunities for confusion, delay and corruption. The Surveyor of the Navy, invariably a former shipwright and supposedly responsible for the construction and maintenance of all the ships and dockyards, should have acted as a coordinator but rarely did so. The labour force worked mainly on day rates and so had no incentive to be efficient, although a certain esprit de corps could be relied upon in emergencies.1 It was long assumed that an English shipwright of the period learnt his art of building and repairing ships primarily through practical training and experience gained on an apprenticeship, in contrast to French naval architects whose education was grounded on science, above all, mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Frindsbury Cricketers Inside This Issue
    The Newsletter of the Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre Issue Number 11: August 2008 Frindsbury Cricketers This photograph from the collection of the Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre (FOMA) Chairman, Tessa Towner, will evoke memories of long hot (mythical) Kentish summers. Standing from left, John Walter (Tessa’s grandfather), 4th on left at back his brother Arthur (with peaked cap), known as Tom. Seated with cap, another brother, George Walter, landlord of the Royal Oak pub, Frindsbury. Also in the photo are probably several of the seven Skilton brothers, it was their father Joseph Skilton along with the Rev Jackson, vicar of Frindsbury, who started the Cricket Club in 1885. The date of the photograph has been narrowed down to about 1907 to 1909. Other possible names playing at this time were the Anderson brothers Colin and Donald (both killed in WWI), W.J.Coleman, A.Francis, H.Harpum, M.W.Lewry, A.Lines, A.E.Loach, N.McKechnie, D.Nye, and A.Ring. Inside this issue... We say goodbye to Stephen Dixon, Borough Archivist. After 18 years at the Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre, Stephen left in June for a new post as Archive Service Manager at Essex Record Office, Chelmsford. One of Stephen’s farewell gifts was a framed photograph, taken by FOMA Chairman Tessa Towner, of him on his boat, taken from the Kingswear Castle during the trip on Saturday 31st May 2008 to follow the 100th Medway Barge Match. About The Clock Tower The Clock Tower is the quarterly journal produced and published by the Friends of Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre (FOMA).
    [Show full text]