The Westminster Model Navy: Defining the Royal Navy, 1660-1749

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Westminster Model Navy: Defining the Royal Navy, 1660-1749 The Westminster Model Navy: Defining the Royal Navy, 1660-1749 Samuel A. McLean PhD Thesis, Department of War Studies May 4, 2017 ABSTRACT At the Restoration of the English monarchy in 1660, Charles II inherited the existing interregnum navy. This was a persistent, but loosely defined organization that included a professional community of officers, a large number of warships, and substantial debts. From the beginning Charles II used royal prerogative to define the Royal Navy. In 1661, Parliament created legislation that simultaneously defined the English state and the Royal Navy. These actions closely linked the Royal Navy’s development to that of the English state, and the use of both statutes and conventions to define the Navy provided the foundation for its development in the ‘Westminster Model’. This thesis considers the Royal Navy’s development from the Restoration to the replacement of the Articles of War in 1749 in five distinct periods. The analysis shows emphasizes both the consistency of process that resulted from the creation and adoption of definitions in 1660, as well as the substantial complexity and differences that resulted from very different institutional, political and geopolitical circumstances in each period. The Royal Navy’s development consisted of the ongoing integration of structural and professional definitions created both in response to crises and pressures, as well as deliberate efforts to improve the institution. The Royal Navy was integrated with the English state, and became an institution associated with specific maritime military expertise, and the foundations laid at the Restoration shaped how the Navy’s development reflected both English state development and professionalization. In particular, the aspects of the Royal Navy that Charles II and Parliament respectively defined in 1660 provide important context for when first Parliament, then the Board of Admiralty later stepped outside those bounds. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 CHAPTER 1: The Restoration and the Royal Navy 41 CHAPTER 2: Charles II and James II 85 CHAPTER 3: The Glorious Revolution and Later Stuarts 137 CHAPTER 4: The Hanoverian Succession to 1740 182 CHAPTER 5: Replacing the Articles of War 223 CONCLUSION 270 BIBLIOGRAPHY 283 3 INTRODUCTION Andrew Lambert argues that '[n]avies developed alongside the nation states that they served. Only strong, centrally controlled states had the tax-raising powers to fund standing navies.'1 Whilst this is undoubtedly true, the nature of the relationship between a navy's development and that of its parent state is more complex than this observation allows. Given the global commercial, military, and imperial power of eighteenth- century Britain, the exploration of this relationship has been of particular historical interest, giving rise more recently to an emphasis, not on strong, centralised monarchies, as such, but to Britain's exceptional, parliamentary constitutional nature and on the long-term fiscal benefits of investment in a strong navy.2 Many histories of the Royal Navy, therefore, explore the links between its development and the growth of the state, building a narrative around key events or developments, such as the creation of the Bank of England in 1694, and privileging the particular constitutional nature and financial resilience of the state. A premise of this thesis is that, although they were closely related, the processes of state development and of naval development were not one and the same thing, nor was the navy just the incidental product of countless political contests and economic and military imperatives. To borrow a phrase from Kathleen Wilson's definition of empire, the navy 'was always in the making, changing, and in process', and it is this process that is of interest here.3 Like the Restoration state itself, which adopted and modified certain aspects of the Commonwealth before it, but which was really an attempted reconstitution of the state as it had existed prior to the civil wars, the navy 1 Andrew Lambert, War at Sea in the Age of Sail, London: Cassell, 2000. 24 2 N.A.M.Rodger, 'From the 'military revolution' to the 'fiscal-naval' state', Journal for Maritime Research 13, 2 (2011), 119-128. 3 Kathleen Wilson, ed., A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660-1840 (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 12. 4 experienced more than a mere re-branding of the Parliamentarian navy. In its own process of change, the Royal Navy naturally built upon the existing fleet and the officers, along with the accumulated debt and experiences of its recent, turbulent history, but it, too, was the product of re-invention, or re-definition. This involved the revival of customs and precedents, such as the appointment of individuals to offices that had been abolished under the Commonwealth. It also resulted in new legal definitions. This thesis, therefore, is primarily a study of the development of the Royal Navy as a contested legislative space, the result of many political contests that left significant, observable traces in the legislative record. It emerged out of the particular circumstances of the Restoration itself in 1660 and, notably, the subsequent insertion of the navy's Articles of War into statute law the following year. The period of study ends in 1749, when these statutes, which defined the Navy, were repealed and amended following the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-48). It is well-known that the Restoration navy needed to come firmly under direct, royal control from 1660 and that the creation of a close association between the navy and the monarchy and of a shared identity was an important moment in the Royal Navy's celebrated history. Yet this study does not take the Royal Navy's future institutional form as a particularly treasured feature of the state or its later operational successes as natural or inevitable, nor as the basis on which to assess its early history. It is not such longer-term results that matter here but the process itself, and a new way of viewing this process can be gleaned from the constantly changing definitions of the navy that are found within statute law and other formal documents. The choice of these 'definitions' as the object of study was partly inspired by what has been referred to as the 'cultural turn' in political and imperial history. Wilson's study of the eighteenth century, for example, defines political culture as 'the realm encompassing political values and 5 ideologies, the forms of their expression – verbal and non-verbal, embodied in both actions and artifacts – and the mechanisms of their dissemination and transformation'.4 The definitions studied here are one such cultural 'artifact' from the past which, together, can shed some light on the process of change in the navy over time. In this sense, something of an 'archaeological approach' to the historical record is being taken here. That is to say that, rather than another study of the many political contests and pressures that affected the navy themselves, it is their outcome in the form of legal definitions which is being uncovered and studied here for the light that they shed on the process of change. An important concept is that of royal prerogative. It has been described as: [t]he personal discretionary powers which remain in the Sovereign's hands. They include the rights to advise, encourage and warn Ministers in private; to appoint the Prime Minister and other Ministers; to assent to legislation; to prorogue or to dissolve Parliament; and (in grave constitutional crisis) to act contrary to or without Ministerial advice.5 Following the Restoration, many powers remained in the King’s hands, including the power to define the state. In particular, it is clear from taking this approach that early definitions of the Royal Navy were not simply imposed by Charles II. In 1661, Parliament passed the Act for the Establishing Articles, which contained the Royal Navy's Articles of War. It also created limits on the authority and jurisdiction of the restored office of Lord High Admiral.6 This provided the Royal Navy with statutory definitions which, together with the customs inherited from the Commonwealth Navy, recreated or modified at the Restoration, in effect formed what will be argued in this 4 Kathleen Wilson, The Sense of the People: Politics, Culture and Imperialism in England, 1715-1785 (Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 12. 5 Parliament, Select Committee on Public Administration Fourth Report, https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/422/42202.htm accessed May 3, 2017. 6 'Charles II, 1661: An Act for the Establishing Articles and Orders for the regulateing and better Government of His Majesties Navies Ships of Warr & Forces by Sea.,' in Statutes of the Realm: Volume 5, 1628-80, ed. John Raithby (s.l: Great Britain Record Commission, 1819), 311-314. British History Online, accessed August 16, 2016, http://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes- realm/vol5/pp311-314. 6 thesis was a ‘Westminster Model’ constitution. This is a twentieth-century concept that is used primarily to describe flexible constitutional arrangements within the Commonwealth, but which also best describes the nature of the subsequent evolution of the navy. This redefinition of the navy was an extraordinary departure that would set the foundations for the navy's subsequent legal development up to the 1740s. Indeed, the replacement of the Articles of War in 1749 appears to have defined another, distinct departure, as it was the first time that the definitions in the Act for the Establishing Articles were entirely replaced, as opposed to just supplemented as circumstances required. By 1749, therefore, the Royal Navy was no longer quite the same contested legislative space that it had been after 1660. The amendments were initiated by members of the Board of Admiralty who sought to implement an institutional philosophy that emphasized discipline and hierarchy in a reaction to the Royal Navy's experiences in the War of the Austrian Succession.
Recommended publications
  • TA22 Catalog Session Vb Medals.Indd
    e Admiral Vernon Medals of 1739 and 1741 by Daniel Frank Sedwick If the heart of collecting is visual and intellectual stimulation mixed with historical study, then the “Admiral Vernon” medals crafted in England in the period 1739-1741 are the perfect collectibles. e sheer number of di erent varieties of these medals makes collecting them both challenging and feasible. Fascination with these historic pieces has spawned more than a dozen studies over the past 180+ years, culminating in the book Medallic Portraits of Admiral Vernon (2010), by John Adams and Fernando Chao (the “AC” reference we quote in our lot descriptions). With this well-illustrated book alone, one can spend many enjoyable hours attributing each piece down to exact die details. e biggest challenge with these medals is condition, as they were heavily used and abused, which makes the present o ering comprising the collection of Richard Stuart an exceptional opportunity. e con! ict began with the capture and torture of the British merchant ship captain Robert Jenkins by the Spanish o Havana, Cuba, in 1731. His alleged punishment for smuggling was the removal of one of his ears, which he physically produced for British Parliament in 1739, setting o what became known as the “War of Jenkins’ Ear” starting that year, e ectively “Great Britain’s " rst protracted naval war in the Americas.” 1 In a burst of vengeful braggadocio, the experienced British admiral Edward Vernon reportedly said he could take the Spanish port of Portobelo, Panama, “with six ships only,” the larger goal being to disrupt the ! ow of Spanish shipping of treasure from the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professionalisation of the Royal Navy: 1660-1688
    The Professionalisation of the Royal Navy: 1660-1688 by Samantha Middleton The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of the University of Portsmouth September 2020 Abstract This thesis analyses the developments made between 1660 and 1688 that contributed towards the Royal Navy becoming a more professionalised organisation. It outlines the impact of individuals and their methods towards achieving professionalisation. The political and financial problems facing the navy before the restoration of the monarchy are also addressed. Biographical case studies of three influential naval reformers; James Stewart, The Duke of York; William Coventry; and Samuel Pepys are used to demonstrate the significant influence that they had on the process of professionalization. This thesis ascertains that although the terminology had not been invented at this stage, the principles of Management Control were implemented by Pepys, Coventry and the Duke of York as a method of organizational professionalisation, identifying examples of performance measurement, rewards systems and the implantation of standard operating procedures. An in-depth analysis of the Duke of York’s instructions for the duties of the Principal Officers demonstrates that the Duke of York introduced enhanced accounting procedures and additional control mechanisms to reduce abuses and increase administrative efficiency. Additionally, a set of professional responsibilities has been created within this thesis for Coventry, whose role as secretary is absent from the instructions. This shows for the first time, that Coventry identified his professional remit as focusing primarily on retrenchment and the reduction of abuses. This contributed towards wider professionalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period Kristin MacLeod Tomlin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Kristin MacLeod, "The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period" (1980). Master's Theses. 1921. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1921 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF HEAVY ORDNANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH NAVY IN THE EARLY TUDOR PERIOD by K ristin MacLeod Tomlin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis grew out of a paper prepared for a seminar at the University of Warwick in 1976-77. Since then, many persons have been invaluable in helping me to complete the work. I would like to express my thanks specifically to the personnel of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, England, and of the Public Records Office, London, for their help in locating sources.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:43:06AM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • British Commemorative Medals
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BRITISH COMMEMORATIVE MEDALS Gold Medals 2074 Victoria, Golden Jubilee 1887, Official Gold Medal, by L C Wyon, after Sir Joseph Edgar Boehm and (reverse), Sir Frederick Leighton, crowned and veiled bust left, rev the Queen enthroned with figures of the arts and industry around her, 58mm, 89.86g, in red leather case of issue (BHM 3219). Extremely fine, damage to clasp of case. £900-1100 944 specimens struck, selling at 13 Guineas each 2075 Victoria, Diamond Jubilee 1887, Official Gold Medal, by G W
    [Show full text]
  • An Ear, a Man from Gipuzkoa in the Basque Country and 190 Boats
    AN EAR, A MAN FROM GIPUZKOA IN THE BASQUE COUNTRY AND 190 BOATS Monthly Strategy Report January 2014 Alejandro Vidal Head of Market Strategy G & FI IN NA K N N C A BEST E B ASSET & R L WEALTH E A V B MANAGEMENT I E O SPAIN W L 2013 G A S W A R D Monthly Strategy Report. January 2014 An ear, a man from Gipuzkoa in the Basque Country and 190 boats. We all know that military interests are tightly bound to economic interests. We are equally aware that Spain has a military past in which defeats stand out and the victories are relatively few. Here is a story that allowed the push that the colonies gave to the Spanish economy to be maintained and which facilitated the independence of the United States. In 1738, with the War of the Spanish Succession at an end, it was now obvious that the Spanish Empire was fi nding it increasingly diffi cult to jointly maintain trade and defend the Latin American strongholds, especially in the Caribbean. Bouts of piracy and smuggling were becoming more frequent and were urged by the King of England, who looked at it as an undeclared war of attrition against the Bourbons, his main enemies who now occupied both the French and Spanish throne. However, given the Spanish weakness in the area was more and more evident, the feeling in the Caribbean was ripe with pre-war tension with pirates and English corsairs placing increasing pressure on the merchants fl ying the Spanish fl ag.
    [Show full text]
  • Ships!), Maps, Lighthouses
    Price £2.00 (free to regular customers) 03.03.21 List up-dated Winter 2020 S H I P S V E S S E L S A N D M A R I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E 03.03.20 Update PHILATELIC SUPPLIES (M.B.O'Neill) 359 Norton Way South Letchworth Garden City HERTS ENGLAND SG6 1SZ (Telephone; 01462-684191 during my office hours 9.15-3.15pm Mon.-Fri.) Web-site: www.philatelicsupplies.co.uk email: [email protected] TERMS OF BUSINESS: & Notes on these lists: (Please read before ordering). 1). All stamps are unmounted mint unless specified otherwise. Prices in Sterling Pounds we aim to be HALF-CATALOGUE PRICE OR UNDER 2). Lists are updated about every 12-14 weeks to include most recent stock movements and New Issues; they are therefore reasonably accurate stockwise 100% pricewise. This reduces the need for "credit notes" and refunds. Alternatives may be listed in case some items are out of stock. However, these popular lists are still best used as soon as possible. Next listings will be printed in 4, 8 & 12 months time so please indicate when next we should send a list on your order form. 3). New Issues Services can be provided if you wish to keep your collection up to date on a Standing Order basis. Details & forms on request. Regret we do not run an on approval service. 4). All orders on our order forms are attended to by return of post. We will keep a photocopy it and return your annotated original.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Coastal Trail & Tasting Seafood of Galicia
    Visit us Vigo Day Tour: Walking Coastal Trail & Tasting Seafood of Cangas, Galicia by EATour Specialist Gastronomic Vigo Day Tour with a boat ride from Vigo to Cangas If you are looking for things to do in Spain and you like walking, history, day trips, trying local delicacies, coastal trails and discovering new places this is probably the right tour for you. Read More Port of Vigo, Galicia The meeting point to start this fantastic day will be at the port of Vigo, located on the map of Spain in Galicia, Pontevedra, right by a statue called El Salto. Once there, your English-Speaking guide will introduce himself and explain to you all about this bronze sculpture by a local artist Francisco Leiro. A bay rich not only in seafood but as well a deep history! We head with our local guide to take the ferry which will take us to the next peninsula, O Morrazo. The Vigo estuary is home to many different battles and raids in the past being the most important one the Battle of Rande, also known as the Battle of Vigo Bay. This battle took place in 1702, during the first few years of the War of the Spanish Succession. The Anglo-Dutch fleet returning from an unsuccessful attempt to capture Cadiz when they heard about a Spanish treasure (laden with silver and goods) that had recently entered Vigo Bay, but it was being escorted by French war-ships. The Anglo-Dutch troops who outnumbered the French-Spanish troops made it into the estuary and raided the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • John Buchan's Uncollected Journalism a Critical and Bibliographic Investigation
    JOHN BUCHAN’S UNCOLLECTED JOURNALISM A CRITICAL AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATION PART II CATALOGUE OF BUCHAN’S UNCOLLECTED JOURNALISM PART II CATALOGUE OF BUCHAN’S UNCOLLECTED JOURNALISM Volume One INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 1 A: LITERATURE AND BOOKS…………………………………………………………………….. 11 B: POETRY AND VERSE…………………………………………………………………………….. 30 C: BIOGRAPHY, MEMOIRS, AND LETTERS………………………………………………… 62 D: HISTORY………………………………………………………………………………………………. 99 E: RELIGION……………………………………………………………………………………………. 126 F: PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE………………………………………………………………… 130 G: POLITICS AND SOCIETY……………………………………………………………………… 146 Volume Two H: IMPERIAL AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS……………………………………………………… 178 I: WAR, MILITARY, AND NAVAL AFFAIRS……………………………………………….. 229 J: ECONOMICS, BUSINESS, AND TRADE UNIONS…………………………………… 262 K: EDUCATION……………………………………………………………………………………….. 272 L: THE LAW AND LEGAL CASES………………………………………………………………. 278 M: TRAVEL AND EXPLORATION……………………………………………………………… 283 N: FISHING, HUNTING, MOUNTAINEERING, AND OTHER SPORTS………….. 304 PART II CATALOGUE OF BUCHAN’S UNCOLLECTED JOURNALISM INTRODUCTION This catalogue has been prepared to assist Buchan specialists and other scholars of all levels and interests who are seeking to research his uncollected journalism. It is based on the standard reference work for Buchan scholars, Robert G Blanchard’s The First Editions of John Buchan: A Collector’s Bibliography (1981), which is generally referred to as Blanchard. The catalogue builds on this work
    [Show full text]
  • K a L E N D E R- B L Ä T T E R
    - Simon Beckert - K A L E N D E R- B L Ä T T E R „Nichts ist so sehr für die „gute alte Zeit“ verantwortlich wie das schlechte Gedächtnis.“ (Anatole France ) Stand: Januar 2016 H I N W E I S E Eckig [umklammerte] Jahresdaten bedeuten, dass der genaue Tag des Ereignisses unbekannt ist. SEITE 2 J A N U A R 1. JANUAR [um 2100 v. Chr.]: Die erste überlieferte große Flottenexpedition der Geschichte findet im Per- sischen Golf unter Führung von König Manishtusu von Akkad gegen ein nicht bekanntes Volk statt. 1908: Der britische Polarforscher Ernest Shackleton verlässt mit dem Schoner Nimrod den Ha- fen Lyttelton (Neuseeland), um mit einer Expedition den magnetischen Südpol zu erkunden (Nimrod-Expedition). 1915: Die HMS Formidable wird in einem Nachtangriff durch das deutsche U-Boot SM U 24 im Ärmelkanal versenkt. Sie ist das erste britische Linienschiff, welches im Ersten Weltkrieg durch Feindeinwirkung verloren geht. 1917: Das deutsche U-Boot SM UB 47 versenkt den britischen Truppentransporter HMT In- vernia etwa 58 Seemeilen südöstlich von Kap Matapan. 1943: Der amerikanische Frachter Arthur Middleton wird vor dem Hafen von Casablanca von dem deutschen U-Boot U 73 durch zwei Torpedos getroffen. Das zu einem Konvoi gehörende Schiff ist mit Munition und Sprengstoff beladen und versinkt innerhalb einer Minute nach einer Explosion der Ladung. 1995: Die automatische Wellenmessanlage der norwegischen Ölbohrplattform Draupner-E meldet in einem Sturm eine Welle mit einer Höhe von 26 Metern. Damit wurde die Existenz von Monsterwellen erstmals eindeutig wissenschaftlich bewiesen. —————————————————————————————————— 2. JANUAR [um 1990 v. Chr.]: Der ägyptische Pharao Amenemhet I.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Dockyards Society
    20TH CENTURY NAVAL DOCKYARDS: DEVONPORT AND PORTSMOUTH CHARACTERISATION REPORT Naval Dockyards Society Devonport Dockyard Portsmouth Dockyard Title page picture acknowledgements Top left: Devonport HM Dockyard 1951 (TNA, WORK 69/19), courtesy The National Archives. Top right: J270/09/64. Photograph of Outmuster at Portsmouth Unicorn Gate (23 Oct 1964). Reproduced by permission of Historic England. Bottom left: Devonport NAAFI (TNA, CM 20/80 September 1979), courtesy The National Archives. Bottom right: Portsmouth Round Tower (1843–48, 1868, 3/262) from the north, with the adjoining rich red brick Offices (1979, 3/261). A. Coats 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the MoD. Commissioned by The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England of 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London, EC1N 2ST, ‘English Heritage’, known after 1 April 2015 as Historic England. Part of the NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION COMMISSIONS PROGRAMME PROJECT NAME: 20th Century Naval Dockyards Devonport and Portsmouth (4A3.203) Project Number 6265 dated 7 December 2012 Fund Name: ARCH Contractor: 9865 Naval Dockyards Society, 44 Lindley Avenue, Southsea, PO4 9NU Jonathan Coad Project adviser Dr Ann Coats Editor, project manager and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Davies Editor and reviewer, project executive and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Evans Devonport researcher David Jenkins Project finance officer Professor Ray Riley Portsmouth researcher Sponsored by the National Museum of the Royal Navy Published by The Naval Dockyards Society 44 Lindley Avenue, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 9NU, England navaldockyards.org First published 2015 Copyright © The Naval Dockyards Society 2015 The Contractor grants to English Heritage a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, perpetual, irrevocable and royalty-free licence to use, copy, reproduce, adapt, modify, enhance, create derivative works and/or commercially exploit the Materials for any purpose required by Historic England.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 04:24:08PM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]