DOCSLIB.ORG

A True L I S 1 the LORDS Spiritual and Temporal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A True L I S 1 the LORDS Spiritual and Temporal: As alfo a LIST of the Knights and Commiffioners of Shires, Citizens and Burgeffes, choien to ferve in the Parliament of Great'Britain, fummoned to meet at Wejlminfler the Twenty fifth of November, 1710. according to the Returns made into the Office of the Clerk of the Crown in Her Majefty’s High Court of Chancery. ■ ^ Note: Thofe which have this Mark, * before them, were not Members of the laft Parliament. Arthur Herbert, Earl of Tor- Borough of Portpigham, alias Borough Harwich. /Ecdttjampronfiifrk, 9 Borougn tt/Andover. Borough of Chippenham. ^Unr, 2. ARCHBISHOPS Sir James Long Bar. rington. Weftlow. Kendrick Edisbury Efq-, Sir Juftinian Ifham Bar. The Rt. Hm. John Smith Ejq-, Sir Roger Moftyn Bar. and BISHOPS. ♦Jofeph Afh Efq-, f A Lift of the PEER S Richard Lomley, Earl of Scar Rt. Hon. Sir Charles Hedges Kt. Thomas Frankland Efq-, Thomas Cartwright Efq-, Wiii'iam Guidott Ffq-, Town of Flint. Borough of Malmesbury. borough. Dr. Thomas Tennifon, Lord Arthur Maynwaring E/y; City of Peterborough. <g)taffo?t)Q?lre, 10. S/r John Conway Bar. Note;*- Thofe marked George Booth, Earl of War- Archbifhop of Canterbury. Borough of Grampound. ®louceflerflfirc, 8. *Hon. John Fitz-Williams Efq Thomas Farrington EJq-, John Berkley Efqi The Hon. Henry Pagett Efq-, Jofeph Addifon Efqj thm *are under Age. rington. Dr. John Sharp, Lord Archbi- Rt. Hon. Thomas Coke Efq\ ♦ ♦Charles Parker Efq-, ©lamojaan, 2. Matthew Ducie Moreton Efqi ♦William Ward Jun. Ejq-, Borough of Crick lade. Richard Newport, E. of Brad- fhop of York. Vice-Chamberlain. Town of Northampton. City of Litchfield. Edmund Dunch Efq-, Rt. Hon. Sir Thomas Manfell ford. Dr. Henry Compton, Lord Bi James Graggs £/?; City of Gloucefter. ♦William Wykes Efq-, D U K E S, &c. Thomas Webb Efq-, ♦Richard Dyot Efq-, ♦Samuel Robinlon Elq-, Margam, Bui-. Frederick Zuleftein, Earl of fhop of London. Borough of Eaftlow. The f/ow.George Montagu Efq\ John Cotes Efq/ T Aureoce Hyde, £. of Ro Dr. Nathanael Crew, Lord Bi- ♦John Blaoch Efq-, Borough of Great-Bedwin. Town of Cardiffe. Rochford. * Sir Henry Seymour Bar. Town of Brackley. Borough of Stafford. I / chefter. Lord Prejident of floop of Durham, and Lord Borough of Cirencefter. Rt. Hon. Charles Lord Bruce. *S/r Edward Stradling Bar. Arnold Jooft vanKeppel, Earl Thomas Smith Efy-, Hon. William Egerton Ejq-, Walter Chetwynd Efq-, A the Council. Crew. Allen Ba'thurit Efq-, Sir Edward Seymour Bar. of Albemarle. Borough.of Penryn. Hon. Cha. Egerton Efq-, Thomas Foley EJq-, John Holies, D. of Newcaftle, Sir Jonathan Trelawny Bar. Charles Coxe Ejyi Borough of Lurgerfhall. 1. ■ ♦Thomas Coventrye, E.of Co- Samuel Trefufis Ef f, Borough of Higham-Ferrars. Borough of Newcaftle under * Lord Privy SeaL Lord Bijhop of Winchefter. Borough of Tewkesbury. John Weob Efqj Richard Vaughan Efq-, ventrye. Alexander Pendarves Efif; 1 Haw. Thomas Wentworth E/^; , " Line. ' Tho. Howard, D. of Norfolk; Dr. William Lloyd, Lord Bijhop ♦Will. Bromley, of Upton, E/2; ♦Thomas Pearce Efq-, Edward Ruflell, E. of Orford. Borough efTregony. ♦Rowland Cotton Efqj Earl-Mar foal, arid Heredita- of Worcefter. Henry Ireton £J<JT Borough of Old Sarum. 2©ontgomerp, 2. f Edward Villiers, E. of Jeiley. The Rt. Hon. Francis Lord Vif- ifioirbumberlanl), ♦William Burflem Efq-, ry Marjhal of England. Dr. Thomas Spratt, Lord Bi- ♦Thomas Pitt Efq-, Edward Vaughan Efq-, ; Henry d’Auverquerque, Earl comt Ryalton. ^erefojDffifre, 8. Borough of Tam worth, John Sherfield, Duke of Buck- of Grantham. fltop of Rochefter. John Trevanion Ejq-, Rt. Hon. Algernoon £. of Hert- ♦William Harvey Jun. Efq-, Town of Montgomery*; Rt. Hon. James Lord Vif count ford. Jofeph Girdler Efqj Serjeant at Borough of Wootton Bauet. ingham and Normanby,Lora: John Campbell, E. of Green- Dr. Gilbert Burnet, Lord Bi- Borough of Boifmey. Scudamore. John Pugh Efq-, fhop of Sarum. Thomas Forfter Jun. Efq. Law. *Rt.Hon. Henry St. John Efq-, Steward of the fhteen's Hou- wich, (and D. of ArgyleJ Hon. Francis Robartes E/^j John Prife Efq-, ♦Samuel Bracebridge Efq-, Jbo/d. Dr. Humphrey Humphreys, Town of Newcaftle upon Tyne- one of Her Majejly's Principal Thomas Wharton, £. of Whar- John Manley Ejq-, City of Hereford. 16. IPemtoofte, 3. Charles Talbor, D- of Shrewl- ton. Lord Bijhop of Hereford. Borough of St. Ives. *-ir William Blacker Bar. Secretaries of State. *John Barlow Efq-, The HAM. James Brydges Efq\ ♦William Wrightfon Efq-, Sir Thomas Hanmer Bar. ♦Richard Goddard Efq-, bury, Lord Chamberlain of John Powlet, £ar/Powlet. Dr. John Hough, Lord Bifhop ♦John Hopkins Ejq-, Thomas Foley Efq-, Town of Pembroke, the Queen's Houjhold. Sidney Godolphin, Earl of Go- of Litchfield and Coventry. John Praed Efq-, Borough of Morpeth. Sir Robert Davers Bar. Borough of Marleborough. Sir Arthur Owen Bar. Borough of Lempfter. Sir Richard Sandtord Bar. Borough of Iplwich. Rt. Hon. Charles Lord Bruce. \ Charles Seymour, Duke of So- dolphin. Dr. John Moore, Lord Bijhop Borough e/Foway. Edward Harley Efq-, Town of Havertord-W< merfet. Hugh Cholmley, £. of Cholm- of Ely. *Rf. H. Geo. Haye, L. Duplin. *Rt.Hon. Chriftopher Lord Vif- Sir William Barker Bar. Hon. Robert Bruce Efq-, John Laugharne E/f; ♦Edward Bangham Efq-, count Caftle-Gomcr. Charles Ffiz-Roy, Duke of ley. Dr. Richard Cumberland, Lord Hemy Vincent fun. Efq-, William Churchill Efqj KIlo?cenecff)fte, 9. Borough of Weobly. Town of Berwick upon Tweed. Borough of Dunwich. Cleveland bouthampton. George Keith, £. Marefchal. Bijhop 0/Peterborough. Borough of St. Germans. John Birch Ejq-, Serj. at Law. Sir John Packington Bar. ISaDno?, a *Hon. William Kerr EfqK ♦George Downing Efq-, Charles Lenos,D.o/Richmond. John Erskine, Earl of Mar. Dr. Edward Fowler, Lord Bi- Edward Eliot Efq-, *Henry Cornwall Efq-, ♦Samuel Pycts Efqj Charles Fitz-Roy, Duke of jhop of Gloucefter. Jonathan Hutchinfon Ejq-, ♦Richird RichardfbnEfqj Ser- Thomas Harley Efq-, Alexander Montgomery, £. of John Knight Efq-, City of Worcefter. Town of New-Radnor, Grafton. Eglingtcn. Dr. William Talbot, Lord Bt- Borough of St. Michael, I^mfojtiQrfire, 6. jPottlnafeamflftre, 8. jeant at Law. Samuel Swift Efq-, James Butler, D. o/Ormond. fhop of Oxford. Ralph Freman Jun. Ejq-, Borough of Orford. The Rt-How.Robert HarlejfJ Alexander Home, £. of Home. ♦ Abraham Blackmore Ejq-, *Rt. Hon. Scroop L Vifc. Howe, Thomas Wylde Efqj Henry Someriet, D. o/Beautort. Dr. John Evans, Lord Bijhop Thomas Halfey Efq-, *Sir Edward Turner Kt. Thomas Hay, £. of Ktnoul. " Richard Bellafis Ejq-, William Levinz, Efqi Borough of Droitwich. George Fitz-Roy,D«£e 0/'Nor- oj Bangor. Borough t>f St. Albans. Clement Corrance Ejq-, Hugh Campbell, E.o/Lowdon Borough 0/New port. Town of Nottingham. Edward Foley Efq-, thumberland. Dr. William Nicolfon, Leri William Grimftohe Ejq-, Borough of Aldborough. David Carnegie,£. o/Northesk. Sir Nicholas Morice Bar. ♦ [ohn Flumtree Efq-, Edward Jeffreyes Efq-, SCOTLAND, (4, Charles Beauclair, Duke of George Hamilton, £.o/'Orkney. John Gape Efq-, Sir Henry Johnfon Kt. Bijhop of Carlifle. George Counenay Efq-, Robert Sacheverell Efq-, Borough of Evetham. St. Albans. Dr. George Hooper, Lord Bi- ♦ William Jonnfon Efq-, Archibald Primrofe, £. 0/Role- Borough of St. Mawes. Borough of Hertford, Borough of Eaft-Retford. Sir Edward Goodere Bar. Shire of Aberdeen. • Charles Pawlet, D.o/'Bolton. berry. Charles Csefar Ejq-, Borough of Sudbury. jhop of Bath and Welta _ - R.H. Sir Richard Onflow Bar. ♦ Thomas White Efq-, John Rudge Efy, Sir Alexander Gumming Meinhardt Schonberg, Duke Archibald Campbel, £. e/Iflay. Dr. William Wake, Lord Bi- Richard Gulfton EJq-, ♦John Mead Efq-, John Tredenham £% ♦ Thomas Weftby E(q-, Borough of Bewdley. Kt. ♦ Robert Echlin Efq-, 4 Schonberg. jhop of Lincoln. Borough of Kellington. ♦ Anthony Lechmere Efq-, Shirs of Air. Thomas Osoorne, D. of Leeds. VISCOUNTS. ^tmrfngtiojnTbfre, 4. Town of Newark upon Trent. of Eye. Dr. John Tyler, Lord Bijhop Sir William Cory ton Bar. ‘John Montgomery Efqm John Prooey Efqi dec. Sir Thomas Willoughby Bar. Sir Jofeph Jekylill Kt. Chief WriOthelley Rufl'el, D. of Bed- Price Devereux, Vifcount He- of Llandaff. Samuel Rolle Ejq^ gogfclfifre, 30. BUrgh oj Irving, ford. John Pocklington Efqi ♦Richard Newdigate Efq-, Juflice of Chefter. reford. Dr. Offspring Blackall, Leri 6 Rt- Hon. Henry Lord Vifcount ♦Charles Oliphant EJq-, William Cavendilh, Duke of CumbtrlanD, . Borough of Huntingdon. ©iron, 9. ♦Thomas Maynard Efq-, Henry Brown, Vifcomt Mon- Bijhop of Exeter. Edward Wortley Efq-, Down. Shire of Argyle. Devonfhire. Sir William Dawes Bar. Lord [ames Lowther Efq-, Borough of St. Edmondsbu-ry. tacute. Gilfrid Lawfon Ejq-, Francis Page Efqi Sir Robert Jenkinfon Bar. *Sir Arthur Kay Bar. Sir James Campbell Bar. - John Churchill, Duke of Marl- Bijhop of Chefter. Francis Ckrke Ejq-, Jofeph Weld Efq-, Serj. at Law. Laurence Fienes, Vifcount Say City of Carlilie. ♦ City of York. Shire of Bamff. 1 a borough. Dr. Charles Trimnell, Lord Bi- Univerfity of Oxon. Aubrie Porter Efqj Sir William Robinlbn Bar. Alexander Abercromby £J| and Sele. Thomas Stanwix Efq-, tot, lo. John Manners, D. of Rutland. Tbomas Bellafyfe, Vifcount jhop of Norwich. Sir William Whitlocke Kt. §&urrep, 14. Hon. Robert Ben ion Efqj Burgh of Bamff, Q-c. 1 John Montagu, D. o/Montagu. Sir James Mountague Kt. Falconberg. Dr. William Fleetwood, Lord Sir Chomley Deering Bar. William Bromley Ejq-, SPEA- *Sir Francis Vincent Bar. Town of Kingfton upon Hull. ♦Alexander Reid Efqj George Augultus, prii.eeEletto- Borough of Cockermouth. Charles Townfhend, Vifcomt Bijhop of St. Afaph. ♦Percival Hart Ejq-, KER. *Hon. Heneage Finch Efq-, Sir William St. Quincin Bar. Shire of Berwick. ral of Hanover, D. of Cam- Nicholas LechmereE/^j Townfhend. Dr. Thomas Maningham, Lord City of Canterbury. City of Oxon, Borough of Southwark. \Villiam MaifterE/^; George Baillie Efqj bridge. James Stanhope Efq^ John Hardrefs Efq-,. Thomas Thynne,l^o»wf Wey- Bijhop of Chichelter.
Recommended publications
  • Gwydir Family

    Gwydir Family

    THE HISTORY OF THE GWYDIR FAMILY, WRITTEN BY SIR JOHN WYNNE, KNT. AND BART., UT CREDITUR, & PATET. OSWESTRY: \VOODJ\LL i\KD VENABLES, OS\VALD ROAD. 1878. WOODALL AND VENABLES, PRINTERS, BAILEY-HEAD AND OSWALD-ROAD. OSWESTRY. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE CLEMENTINA ELIZABETH, {!N HER OWN lHGHT) BARONESS WILLOUGHBY DE ERESBY, THE REPRESENTATIVE OF 'l'HE OLD GWYDIR STOCK AND THE OWNER OF THE ESTATE; THE FOURTEENTH WHO HAS BORNE THAT ANCIENT BARONY: THIS EDITION OF THE HISTORY OF THE GWYDIR FAMILY IS, BY PERMISSION, RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED BY THE PUBLISHERS. OSWALD ROAD, OSWESTRY, 1878. PREFACE F all the works which have been written relating to the general or family history O of North Wales, none have been for centuries more esteemed than the History of the Gwydir Family. The Hon. Daines Barrington, in his preface to his first edition of the work, published in 1770, has well said, "The MS. hath, for above.a cent~ry, been so prized in North Wales, that many in those parts have thought it worth while to make fair and complete transcripts of it." Of these transcripts the earliest known to exist is one in the Library at Brogyntyn. It was probably written within 45 years of the death of the author; but besides that, it contains a great number of notes and additions of nearly the same date, which have never yet appeared in print. The History of the Gwydir Family has been thrice published. The first editiun, edited by the Hon. Daines Barrington, issued from the press in 1770. The second was published in Mr.
  • The Church Militant: the American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92

    The Church Militant: the American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92

    The Church Militant: The American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92 Peter W. Walker Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Peter Walker All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Church Militant: The American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92 Peter W. Walker This dissertation is a study of the loyalist Church of England clergy in the American Revolution. By reconstructing the experience and identity of this largely-misunderstood group, it sheds light on the relationship between church and empire, the role of religious pluralism and toleration in the American Revolution, the dynamics of loyalist politics, and the religious impact of the American Revolution on Britain. It is based primarily on the loyalist clergy’s own correspondence and writings, the records of the American Loyalist Claims Commission, and the archives of the SPG (the Church of England’s missionary arm). The study focuses on the New England and Mid-Atlantic colonies, where Anglicans formed a religious minority and where their clergy were overwhelmingly loyalist. It begins with the founding of the SPG in 1701 and its first forays into America. It then examines the state of religious pluralism and toleration in New England, the polarising contest over the proposed creation of an American bishop after the Seven Years’ War, and the role of the loyalist clergy in the Revolutionary War itself, focusing particularly on conflicts occasioned by the Anglican liturgy and Book of Common Prayer.
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority

    Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
  • Speakers of the House of Commons

    Speakers of the House of Commons

    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
  • In the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708

    In the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708

    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:43:06AM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
  • STEPHEN TAYLOR the Clergy at the Courts of George I and George II

    STEPHEN TAYLOR the Clergy at the Courts of George I and George II

    STEPHEN TAYLOR The Clergy at the Courts of George I and George II in MICHAEL SCHAICH (ed.), Monarchy and Religion: The Transformation of Royal Culture in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) pp. 129–151 ISBN: 978 0 19 921472 3 The following PDF is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence. Anyone may freely read, download, distribute, and make the work available to the public in printed or electronic form provided that appropriate credit is given. However, no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered or transformed, or serve as the basis for a derivative work. The publication rights for this volume have formally reverted from Oxford University Press to the German Historical Institute London. All reasonable effort has been made to contact any further copyright holders in this volume. Any objections to this material being published online under open access should be addressed to the German Historical Institute London. DOI: 5 The Clergy at the Courts of George I and George II STEPHEN TAYLOR In the years between the Reformation and the revolution of 1688 the court lay at the very heart of English religious life. Court bishops played an important role as royal councillors in matters concerning both church and commonwealth. 1 Royal chaplaincies were sought after, both as important steps on the road of prefer- ment and as positions from which to influence religious policy.2 Printed court sermons were a prominent literary genre, providing not least an important forum for debate about the nature and character of the English Reformation.
  • Stapylton Final Version

    Stapylton Final Version

    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
  • PLEASE NOTE This Is a Draft Paper Only and Should Not Be Cited Without

    PLEASE NOTE This Is a Draft Paper Only and Should Not Be Cited Without

    PLEASE NOTE This is a draft paper only and should not be cited without the author’s express permission THE SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF THE >GLORIOUS REVOLUTION= ON THE ENGLISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM On February 14, 1689, The day after William and Mary were recognized by the Convention Parliament as King and Queen, the first members of their Privy Council were sworn in. And, during the following two to three weeks, all of the various high offices in the government and the royal household were filled. Most of the politically powerful posts went either to tories or to moderates. The tory Earl of Danby was made Lord President of the Council and another tory, the Earl of Nottingham was made Secretary of State for the Southern Department. The office of Lord Privy Seal was given to the Atrimming@ Marquess of Halifax, whom dedicated whigs had still not forgiven for his part in bringing about the disastrous defeat of the exclusion bill in the Lords= house eight years earlier. Charles Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, who was named Principal Secretary of State, can really only be described as tilting towards the whigs at this time. But, at the Admiralty and the Treasury, both of which were put into commission, in each case a whig stalwart was named as the first commissioner--Lord Mordaunt and Arthur Herbert respectivelyBand also in each case a number of other leading whigs were named to the commission as well.i Whig lawyers, on the whole, did rather better than their lay fellow-partisans. Devonshire lawyer and Inner Temple Bencher Henry Pollexfen was immediately appointed Attorney- General, and his cousin, Middle Templar George Treby, Solicitor General.
  • Commander Ship Port Tons Mate Gunner Boatswain Carpenter Cook

    Commander Ship Port Tons Mate Gunner Boatswain Carpenter Cook

    www.1812privateers.org ©Michael Dun Commander Ship Port Tons Mate Gunner Boatswain Carpenter Cook Surgeon William Auld Dalmarnock Glasgow 315 John Auld Robert Miller Peter Johnston Donald Smith Robert Paton William McAlpin Robert McGeorge Diana Glasgow 305 John Dal ? Henry Moss William Long John Birch Henry Jukes William Morgan William Abrams Dunlop Glasgow 331 David Hogg John Williams John Simpson William James John Nelson - Duncan Grey Eclipse Glasgow 263 James Foulke Martin Lawrence Joseph Kelly John Kerr Robert Moss - John Barr Cumming Edward Glasgow 236 John Jenkins James Lee Richard Wiles Thomas Long James Anderson William Bridger Alexander Hardie Emperor Alexander Glasgow 327 John Jones William Jones John Thomas William Thomas James Williams James Thomas Thomas Pollock Lousia Glasgow 324 Alexander McLauren Robert Caldwell Solomon Piike John Duncan James Caldwell none John Bald Maria Glasgow 309 Charles Nelson James Cotton? John George Thomas Wood William Lamb Richard Smith James Bogg Monarch Glasgow 375 Archibald Stewart Thomas Boutfield William Dial Lachlan McLean Donald Docherty none George Bell Bellona Greenock 361 James Wise Thomas Jones Alexander Wigley Philip Johnson Richard Dixon Thomas Dacers Daniel McLarty Caesar Greenock 432 Mathew Simpson John Thomson William Wilson Archibald Stewart Donald McKechnie William Lee Thomas Boag Caledonia Greenock 623 Thomas Wills James Barnes Richard Lee George Hunt William Richards Charles Bailey William Atholl Defiance Greenock 346 James McCullum Francis Duffin John Senston Robert Beck
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • Female Education in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries in England and Wales: a Study of Attitudes and Practi Ce

    Female Education in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries in England and Wales: a Study of Attitudes and Practi Ce

    FEMALE EDUCATION IN THE LATE SIXTEENTH AND EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES: A STUDY OF ATTITUDES AND PRACTI CE Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: January 1996 Caroline Mary Kynaston Bowden Institute of Education, University of London \ 2 ABSTRACT OF THESIS This thesis provides a study of attitudes and practice in respect of female education in England and Wales in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. It begins with a review of primary and secondary sources, and throughout draws substantially upon personal documents consulted in collections of family papers covering a wide geographical area. These documents, it is argued are broadly representative of gentry families. Chapter Two examines the education of daughters; Chapter Three the role of women in marriage; Chapter Four motherhood. Each of these chapters examines the links between education and the roles girls and women fulfilled. Throughout these three chapters, contrasts and comparisons are drawn between prescriptive advice and practice. Chapter Five considers the difficult issue of standards in the education of girls and women, while the final chapter examines some of the outcomes of education in terms of women as intermediaries in informal power networks, estate and farm managers and educational benefactors and founders. The thesis draws conclusions in respect of the importance of education in permitting the developing role of women in both private and public spheres and examines the reasons for such changes. It also challenges existing theories regarding the differences between Catholic and Protestant attitudes to girls' education. A substantial appendix listing some 870 educated and literate women of the period is provided, both to demonstrate the major sources for this study and to provide a basis for future research.
  • Ordination Sermons: a Bibliography1

    Ordination Sermons: a Bibliography1

    Ordination Sermons: A Bibliography1 Aikman, J. Logan. The Waiting Islands an Address to the Rev. George Alexander Tuner, M.B., C.M. on His Ordination as a Missionary to Samoa. Glasgow: George Gallie.. [etc.], 1868. CCC. The Waiting Islands an Address to the Rev. George Alexander Tuner, M.B., C.M. on His Ordination as a Missionary to Samoa. Glasgow: George Gallie.. [etc.], 1868. Aitken, James. The Church of the Living God Sermon and Charge at an Ordination of Ruling Elders, 22nd June 1884. Edinburgh: Robert Somerville.. [etc.], 1884. Allen, William. The Minister's Warfare and Weapons a Sermon Preached at the Installation of Rev. Seneca White at Wiscasset, April 18, 1832. Brunswick [Me.]: Press of Joseph Grif- fin, 1832. Allen, Willoughby C. The Christian Hope. London: John Murray, 1917. Ames, William, Dan Taylor, William Thompson, of Boston, and Benjamin. Worship. The Re- spective Duties of Ministers and People Briefly Explained and Enforced the Substance of Two Discourses, Delivered at Great-Yarmouth, in Norfolk, Jan. 9th, 1775, at the Ordina- tion of the Rev. Mr. Benjamin Worship, to the Pastoral Office. Leeds: Printed by Griffith Wright, 1775. Another brother. A Sermon Preach't at a Publick Ordination in a Country Congregation, on Acts XIII. 2, 3. Together with an Exhortation to the Minister and People. London: Printed for John Lawrance.., 1697. Appleton, Nathaniel, and American Imprint Collection (Library of Congress). How God Wills the Salvation of All Men, and Their Coming to the Knowledge of the Truth as the Means Thereof Illustrated in a Sermon from I Tim. II, 4 Preached in Boston, March 27, 1753 at the Ordination of the Rev.