DOCSLIB.ORG

10.5.2017 A8-0175/1 Amendment 1 Angélique Delahaye, Pilar Ayuso

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10.5.2017 A8-0175/1 Amendment 1 Angélique Delahaye, Pilar Ayuso 10.5.2017 A8-0175/1 Amendment 1 Angélique Delahaye, Pilar Ayuso, Georges Bach, Burkhard Balz, Ivo Belet, Wim van de Camp, Carlos Coelho, Birgit Collin-Langen, Andor Deli, Markus Ferber, José Manuel Fernandes, Jens Gieseke, Danuta Maria Hübner, Seán Kelly, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Esther de Lange, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Markus Pieper, Massimiliano Salini, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Sven Schulze, Andreas Schwab, Csaba Sógor, Ivan Štefanec, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Dubravka Šuica, Romana Tomc, Herbert Dorfmann, Francesc Gambús, Françoise Grossetête, Albert Deß, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Brice Hortefeux, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Alain Cadec, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Alberto Cirio, Rachida Dati, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Janusz Lewandowski, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Fernando Ruas, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Paul Rübig, Maria Spyraki, Patricija Šulin, Francisco José Millán Mon, Renaud Muselier, Michel Dantin, Gabriel Mato, Maurice Ponga, Lefteris Christoforou, Jan Olbrycht, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Nuno Melo, Elisabeth Köstinger, Renate Sommer, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Esteban González Pons, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Lorenzo Cesa, Arnaud Danjean, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Marc Joulaud, Philippe Juvin, Giovanni La Via, Alain Lamassoure, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Miroslav Mikolášik, Nadine Morano, Marijana Petir, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Reimer Böge, Daniel Buda, David Casa, Andrzej Grzyb, Esther Herranz García, Monika Hohlmeier, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, David McAllister, Elisabetta Gardini, Siegfried Mureşan, Angelika Niebler, Herbert Reul, Anne Sander, Rainer Wieland, Peter Jahr, Werner Langen Report A8-0175/2017 Biljana Borzan Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety 2016/2223(INI) Motion for a resolution Recital AI Motion for a resolution Amendment AI. whereas date marking on food AI. whereas date marking on food products is poorly understood, especially products is poorly understood, especially by consumers; whereas ‘best before’ by consumers; whereas ‘best before’ labelling indicates the date after which an labelling indicates the date after which an item of food may generally still be eaten item of food may generally still be eaten but may not be at its best in terms of but may not be at its best in terms of quality, while ‘use by’ labelling indicates quality, while ‘use by’ labelling indicates the date after which an item of food is no the date after which an item of food is no longer safe to eat; whereas not even half of longer safe to eat; whereas not even half of EU citizens understand the meanings of EU citizens understand the meanings of ‘best before’ and ‘use by’ labelling4; ‘best before’ and ‘use by’ labelling4; whereas the use of ‘best before’ and ‘use whereas the use of ‘best before’ and ‘use AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN by’ labelling and the ways in which it is by’ labelling and the ways in which it is understood varies from one Member State understood varies from one Member State to another, and between different to another, and between different producers, processors and distributors, producers, processors and distributors, even if the product is the same; whereas even if the product is the same; recalling consumers are often unable to read the that according to Article 13 of Regulation date on a product because of how it is (EU) No 1169/2011 on food information printed or located; to consumers the due date has to be easy to find on a product and clearly legible; _______________ 4 Flash Eurobarometer 425, ‘Food waste and date ______________ marking’, September 2015. 4 Flash Eurobarometer 425, ‘Food waste and date marking’, September 2015. Or. en AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 10.5.2017 A8-0175/2 Amendment 2 Angélique Delahaye, Pilar Ayuso, Georges Bach, Burkhard Balz, Ivo Belet, Wim van de Camp, Carlos Coelho, Birgit Collin-Langen, Andor Deli, Markus Ferber, José Manuel Fernandes, Jens Gieseke, Danuta Maria Hübner, Seán Kelly, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Esther de Lange, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Markus Pieper, Massimiliano Salini, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Sven Schulze, Andreas Schwab, Csaba Sógor, Ivan Štefanec, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Dubravka Šuica, Romana Tomc, Herbert Dorfmann, Francesc Gambús, Françoise Grossetête, Jan Olbrycht, Lefteris Christoforou, Maurice Ponga, Gabriel Mato, Michel Dantin, Renaud Muselier, Francisco José Millán Mon, Patricija Šulin, Maria Spyraki, Paul Rübig, Brice Hortefeux, Albert Deß, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Janusz Lewandowski, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Fernando Ruas, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Rachida Dati, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Alain Cadec, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Alberto Cirio, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Nuno Melo, Elisabeth Köstinger, Renate Sommer, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Esteban González Pons, Rainer Wieland, Angelika Niebler, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Jérôme Lavrilleux, Werner Langen, Andrzej Grzyb, Esther Herranz García, Monika Hohlmeier, Daniel Buda, David Casa, Reimer Böge, Nadine Morano, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Anne Sander, Herbert Reul, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Lorenzo Cesa, Arnaud Danjean, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Marc Joulaud, Philippe Juvin, Giovanni La Via, Alain Lamassoure, Miroslav Mikolášik, Marijana Petir, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Elisabetta Gardini, Peter Jahr Report A8-0175/2017 Biljana Borzan Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety 2016/2223(INI) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Motion for a resolution Amendment 36. Reiterates the need for the 36. Reiterates the need for the Commission to adopt, by 31 December Commission to draw up a report by 2018, horizontal regulatory measures in 31 December 2018 to assess the need for the sustainable consumption and cross-cutting regulatory measures in the production sector, and to draft an impact sustainable consumption and production report to identify the regulations whose sector, and to draft an impact report to interaction is acting as a barrier to the identify the regulations whose interaction development of synergies between sectors, is acting as a barrier to the development of including the agri-food sector, and is synergies between sectors, and is hindering hindering the use of by-products; the use of by-products; AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Or. en AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 10.5.2017 A8-0175/3 Amendment 3 Angélique Delahaye, Pilar Ayuso, Georges Bach, Burkhard Balz, Ivo Belet, Wim van de Camp, Carlos Coelho, Birgit Collin-Langen, Andor Deli, Markus Ferber, José Manuel Fernandes, Jens Gieseke, Danuta Maria Hübner, Seán Kelly, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Esther de Lange, Peter Liese, Norbert Lins, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Markus Pieper, Massimiliano Salini, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Sven Schulze, Andreas Schwab, Csaba Sógor, Ivan Štefanec, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Dubravka Šuica, Romana Tomc, Herbert Dorfmann, Francesc Gambús, Françoise Grossetête, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Rachida Dati, Santiago Fisas Ayxelà, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Alain Cadec, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Alberto Cirio, Brice Hortefeux, Albert Deß, Paul Rübig, Francisco José Millán Mon, Verónica Lope Fontagné, Christofer Fjellner, Maria Spyraki, Ingeborg Gräßle, Patricija Šulin, Renaud Muselier, Maurice Ponga, Michel Dantin, Janusz Lewandowski, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gabriel Mato, Lefteris Christoforou, Fernando Ruas, Jan Olbrycht, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Nuno Melo, Elisabeth Köstinger, Renate Sommer, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso, Esteban González Pons, Reimer Böge, David Casa, Daniel Buda, Monika Hohlmeier, Esther Herranz García, Andrzej Grzyb, Werner Langen, Jérôme Lavrilleux, David McAllister, Siegfried Mureşan, Angelika Niebler, Herbert Reul, Anne Sander, Rainer Wieland, Michèle Alliot-Marie, Nadine Morano, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Alain Lamassoure, Elisabetta Gardini, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Miroslav Mikolášik, Marijana Petir, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Giovanni La Via, Lorenzo Cesa, Arnaud Danjean, Peter Jahr, Marc Joulaud, Philippe Juvin Report A8-0175/2017 Biljana Borzan Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety 2016/2223(INI) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 Motion for a resolution Amendment 75. Points out that large quantities of 75. Points out that certain quantities of perfectly edible fruits and vegetables do perfectly edible fruits and vegetables do not reach the market for aesthetic reasons not reach the market for aesthetic reasons and on account of marketing standards; and on account of marketing standards; notes that there are successful initiatives notes that there are already initiatives that that make use of such products, and make use of such products; calls on the encourages stakeholders from the Commission and the Member States to wholesale and retail sector to promote undertake research on the relation between such practices; calls on the Commission marketing standards and food waste and and the Member States to boost the the impact on the income of farmers in development of markets for such foods, this context; AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN and to undertake research on the relation between marketing standards and food waste in this context; Or. en AM\1125602EN.docx PE603.749v01-00 EN United in diversity EN .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Regional Development Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs REGI_PV(2016)1108_1 MINUTES Extraordinary joint meeting of 8 November 2016, 17.00-19.00 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 17.10 on Tuesday, 8 November 2016, with Iskra Mihaylova and Roberto Gualtieri (REGI and ECON Chairs respectively) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda REGI_OJ (2016)1108_1 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements None. 3. Exchange of views with ministers from Spain and Portugal in the context of the Structured Dialogue foreseen by Regulation (EU) Nº1303/2013 (Common Provisions Regulation), Article 23 First session: Spain Speakers: Iskra Mihaylova, Roberto Gualtieri, Luis de Guindos Jurado (Spanish Minister of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness) Speakers on behalf of REGI: Lambert van Nistelrooij, Andrea Cozzolino, Andrew Lewer, Ivan Jakovčić, Younous Omarjee, Monika Vana, Rosa D'Amato, Ramón Luis Valcárcel Siso Speakers on behalf of ECON: Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Pervenche Berès, Enrique Calvet Chambon, Paloma López Bermejo, Ernest Urtasun, Jonás Fernández Speakers on behalf of other committees: José Manuel Fernandes (BUDG), Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto (EMPL), Clara Eugenia Aguilera García (AGRI), Gabriel Mato (PECH) PV\1109230EN.docx PE593.961v01-00 EN United in diversityEN Second session: Portugal Speakers: Iskra Mihaylova, Roberto Gualtieri, Mário Centeno (Portuguese Minister of Finance) Speakers on behalf of ECON: Burkhard Balz, Pervenche Berès, Enrique Calvet Chambon, Miguel Viegas, Ernest Urtasun, Ivana Maletić, Pedro Silva Pereira Speakers on behalf of REGI: Lambert van Nistelrooij, Andrea Cozzolino, Andrew Lewer, Matthijs van Miltenburg, Younous Omarjee, Monika Vana, Rosa D'Amato, Fernando Ruas, Liliana Rodrigues Speakers on behalf of other committees: José Manuel Fernandes (BUDG), Sofia Ribeiro (EMPL), Nuno Melo (AGRI), João Ferreira (PECH) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 6516/17 FFF/Mn 1 DRI at the Above Mentioned Part-Session, The
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 April 2017 (OR. en) 6516/17 PE-RE 4 'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee (part 2) / Council Subject: RESOLUTIONS and DECISIONS adopted by the European Parliament at its part-session in Strasbourg from 3 to 6 April 2017. At the above mentioned part-session, the European Parliament adopted 34 acts1 as follows: - 17 legislative acts - 17 non-legislative acts I. Legislative Acts A. Ordinary Legislative Procedure First reading 1) Characteristics for fishing vessels Report: Werner Kuhn (A8-0376/2016) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0096 2) Certain aspects of company law Report: Tadeusz Zwiefka (A8-0088/2017) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0103 3) Money market funds Report: Neena Gill (A8-0041/2015) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0109 1 To consult the acts, Ctrl + click on the hyperlink (P8 reference) contained in the text concerned. You will be directed to the act as published on the European Parliament's website. 6516/17 FFF/mn 1 DRI EN 4) Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading Report: Petr Ježek (A8-0238/2016) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0110 5) Wholesale roaming markets Report: Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (A8-0372/2016) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0128 6) Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Ukraine Report: Mariya Gabriel (A8-0274/2016) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0129 Second reading 7) Medical devices Recommendation for second reading: Glenis Willmott (A8-0068/2017) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0107 8) In vitro diagnostic medical devices Recommendation for second reading: Peter Liese (A8-0069/2017) European Parliament legislative resolution P8_TA(2017)0108 B.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2019/2211(INI) 20.1.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 33 Draft opinion Pascal Canfin (PE646.764v01-00) European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2020 (2019/2211(INI)) AM\1196764EN.docx PE646.849v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE646.849v01-00 2/19 AM\1196764EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Jytte Guteland Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Notes that the Political Guidelines 1. Strongly welcomes that the for the next Commission 2019 - 2024 set Political Guidelines for the next out the principle to integrate United Commission 2019 - 2024 set out the Nations Sustainable Development Goals principle to integrate United Nations (SDGs) in the European Semester process Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in and that such approach has been mirrored the European Semester process and that in the mission letters for the Commissioner such approach has been mirrored in the responsible for Economy, and for the mission letters for the Commissioner Executive Vice-Presidents responsible for, responsible for Economy, and for the respectively, the European Green Deal and Executive Vice-Presidents responsible for, an Economy that Works for the People; respectively, the European Green Deal and an Economy that Works for the People; Or. en Amendment 2 Bas Eickhout, Yannick Jadot Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Welcomes the fact that the 2. Reiterates its call for the Communication makes the European transformative
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Mapa De Poder Na Rede EN 31Marco V3
    PORTUGAL TOP 50: MAP OF POWER ON THE NET Influential Politicians in Twitter March 2015 BARCELONA | BOGOTÁ | BUENOS AIRES | LIMA | LISBOA | MADRID | MÉXICO | PANAMÁ | QUITO | RÍO DE JANEIRO | SÃO PAULO | SANTIAGO DE CHILE | SANTO DOMINGO Elaborado por TOP 50 DUARTE MARQUES MAP 45 LÍDIA BULCÃO DIOGO FEIO RUI 28 49 OF POWER MOREIRA JORGE SEGURO FILIPE SANTOS MARISA MATIAS SANCHES 29 HENRIQUES 47 LUÍS VALES PEDRO 11 27 PASSOS COELHO 12 ON THE NET PAULO PEDROSO ANTÓNIO FILIPE 13 MÁRIO RUIVO 30 7 CATARINA MARTINS Influential Politicians 44 CARLOS 10 COELHO in Twitter 14 ANTÓNIO JOSÉ SEGURO JOANA PORTUGAL - March 2015 33 AMARAL DIAS MICHAEL RUI TAVARES 8 SEUFERT TOP 50 RANKING Map of Power on the DANIEL 25 MIGUEL TIAGO OLIVEIRA 3 Net - Influential Politicians in Twitter is 16 1 the result of the research work by IMAGO - LLORENTE & CUENCA to PEDRO MOTA identify, measure, and compare the SOARES 32 9 EDITE ESTRELA level of influence held by the main Por- tuguese politicians in the digital arena. ANÍBAL 15 MARIA GRAÇA CARVALHO CAVACO SILVA 26 The research conducted took as its MAP OF starting point the premise that Twitter - INFLUENCE INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE INFLUENCE - INFLUENCE is the maximum example of online in- fluence - an open space where informa- 0 25 50 75 POWER 75 50 25 0 tion is public, in which relationships are JOSÉ GUSMÃO 34 50 established and ideas spread more PEDRO SANTANA LOPES concisely and quickly than on any other 42 ADOLFO social network. MESQUITA NUNES NUNO MELO 48 24 GARCIA PEREIRA Is there any link between online pres- ANTÓNIO 31 ANA 6 ence and influence outside the Inter- PRÔA GOMES net? Should personal online assets be 41 RUI RIO explored by politicians as mechanisms JOSÉ 17 to approach their voters? These and JUNQUEIRO 4 23 LUIS MENEZES other questions are discussed in this 2 CARLOS study.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections 2019
    European Elections 2019 Date: May 20th 2019 European Elections 2019 In the Report “European Elections 2019”, Political Intelligence Lisboa assembles and analyses key political data on the next European Elections and Portuguese Electoral Landscape Table of Contents 1. European Elections Setting 2. European Political Families 3. Portuguese Electoral Landscape 4. Portuguese Political Parties Manifestos 5. European Elections Hot Topics T: (+351) 211 921 396 Av. Eng Duarte Pacheco, nº19, 4º dto 1070-100 Lisboa European Elections 2019 1. EUROPEAN ELECTIONS SETTING The last term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) was marked by several decisive moments, with repercussions on the next political cycle, namely on digital, environmental sustainability and budgetary policy subjects. Digital Approval of the EU Copyright Directive in Proposal for the creation of a tax on digital the Single Digital Market to standardise services traded in Europe. Its rejection by European legislation applicable on several Member-States led to an appeal authors’ rights in today’s digital era for the alteration of the voting systems in EU tax policy The viability of its transposition for the Portuguese jurisdiction will be in Changing the voting system from discussion at the next Parliament term unanimity to a qualified majority voting would lead to an increase in European competences concerning tax policy. The scope of its activities will be the target of future debate on the next European political cycle T: (+351) 211 921 396 Av. Eng Duarte Pacheco, nº19, 4º dto
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Care Farming State-Of-The-Art National Report
    2017-1-PL01-KA202-038380 CARE-T-FARMS Care Activities Raising Employment and Training on Farm Adaptation to Responsible and Mental-health Services Care Farming State-of-the-Art European Report https://europa.eu/european-union/about-e 1 Developed by the European Landowners’ Organization in Brussels, Belgium (Marie-Alice Budniok, Maeve Howe, and Servane Morand) February 2018 page 1 of 16 Introduction 1. Theoretical background of care farming at European level. Care farming, also known as “green care”, “social farming”, "farming for health", and "green therapies", has taken on various forms and is organised in different ways in different European countries. There is great variety in the approaches to social farming across Europe, as well as in how it is connected to other sectors and the funding mechanisms that are used. Care farming has taken on many different forms across Europe, broadly based around three different discourses; multifunctional agriculture, public health, and social inclusion. One could say that care farming is most established in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy. Most research in the Netherlands focuses on care farming as part of the agricultural sector and as a new source of farm income. Great importance is also placed on interaction between participants and the farmers and their families. Care farming took off commercially in the Netherlands in the 1990s. It tends to operate on a service-based model. Engaging in care farming activities are seen as a type of social or health service and these activities are paid for directly or indirectly through health insurance. Similarities with the Dutch experience of social farming can be observed in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovenia.
    [Show full text]