DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT on the Draft Council Implementing Decision on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT on the Draft Council Implementing Decision on The European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0100/2020 8.5.2020 * REPORT on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in the United Kingdom (14247/2019 – C9-0198/2019 – 2019/0819(CNS)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1204849EN.docx PE647.041v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_CNS_LegAct_rej Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text New text is highlighted in bold italics. Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced. By way of exception, purely technical changes made by the drafting departments in preparing the final text are not highlighted. PE647.041v03-00 2/13 RR\1204849EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION .................................5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ..............................................................................................6 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ...................................................................12 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ....................................13 RR\1204849EN.docx 3/13 PE647.041v03-00 EN PE647.041v03-00 4/13 RR\1204849EN.docx EN DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in the United Kingdom (14247/2019 – C9-0198/2019 – 2019/0819(CNS)) (Consultation) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council draft (14247/2019), – having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0198/2019), – having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime1, and in particular Article 33 thereof, – having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0100/2020), 1. Rejects the Council draft; 2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. 1 OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1. RR\1204849EN.docx 5/13 PE647.041v03-00 EN EXPLANATORY STATEMENT The present draft Council implementing decision, based on Article 33 of the Council Decision 2008/615/JHA (thereinafter the Prüm Decision)1 seeks to allow for the exchange of dactyloscopic data between the UK and the Member States bound by the Prüm Decision. 1. Background The Prüm Decision provides for the exchange of information between the Member States’ authorities responsible for the prevention and investigation of criminal offences. To this purpose, the competent authorities may exchange dactyloscopic data processed in their national automated fingerprint identification systems established for the prevention and investigation of criminal offences. Article 9 of Prüm Decision provides for a competent authority of a Member State to carry out automated searching of dactyloscopic data in the national system of another Member State. The supply of personal data provided for under this Decision may not take place until the Council has decided that a Member State wishing to take part in this exchange has implemented in its national law the general provisions on data protection set out in the Prüm Decision (Articles 25(2) and 33 ). In accordance with Council Decision 2008/616/JHA2 the proposed Implementing Decision is to be adopted after an evaluation report on the implementation of the general provisions on data protection set out in the Prüm Decision, based on a questionnaire, pilot run and an evaluation visit, the results of which are to be presented to the Council. The system of exchange of information between competent authorities of the Member States established by the Prüm Decision is based on the principle of full reciprocity of access and aims to step up the cross-border cooperation by exchanges of the data processed in their national systems for the prevention and investigation of criminal offences (e.g. data on convicted persons and suspects). It has become clear, however, that the implementation of Prüm by different Member States is not entirely in line with the principle of full reciprocity. Furthermore, the capacity of information sharing between Member States also varies greatly and results in an unbalanced information flow. In 2019 the Council adopted a decision granting the UK access to the exchange mechanism for DNA related information3. By the proposed draft the Council aims to provide access to the UK to the exchange of dactyloscopic data. No intention has been formulated by the Council to start a similar process for vehicle registration data, which is the most successful part of the Prüm architecture. The Council Decisions 2008/615/JHA and 2008/616/JHA set out rules for exchange between the Member States. In this regard, it is to be noted that in October 2019, the European Commission decided to launch infringement procedures by sending letters of formal notice to Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania for signing on 13 September 2018 an agreement with 1 Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime; OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1. 2 Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 12. 3 Implementing Decision 2019/968 of 6 June 2019 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in the United Kingdom, OJ L 156, 13.6.2019, p. 8. PE647.041v03-00 6/13 RR\1204849EN.docx EN five Western Balkan countries on the automated exchange of DNA data, dactyloscopic data and vehicle registration. The Commission considers that the agreement is in breach of EU exclusive competence in the area, especially because the exchange of such data between the Member States is covered by the Prüm Council Decisions (Council Decisions 2008/615/JHA and 2008/616/JHA).4 Similar concerns have been expressed regarding the setting up of an exchange of DNA and dactyloscopic data with other third countries such as the USA. 2. Objective and main elements of the Council draft decision By this draft implementing Decision, the Council seeks to allow the United Kingdom to participate in the automated searching of dactyloscopic data and to proceed to the supply and reception of dactyloscopic data pursuant to the system laid down in Article 9 of Prüm Decision. However, as the Council states in its draft implementing decision, the United Kingdom does not have the intention to make available dactyloscopic data of suspects, contrary to the expectation by the Council, and in contrast with similar decisions adopted for other Member States. This is also contrary to the reciprocity principle underlying the Prüm system. The Council accepted this particular situation in its previous Implementing Decision 2019/968 of 6 June 2019 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in the United Kingdom, in force as from 7 June 2019. The Council, mindful of the breach of the principle of reciprocity, and after the Commission stated a negative opinion due to the breach of the principle of full reciprocity, stressed the practical and operational significance of inclusion of suspects' profiles in automated DNA data exchange for public security, in particular for combating terrorism and cross-border crime. Therefore, the Council has expressly subordinated the continuation of these exchanges to the obligation for the United Kingdom to undertake a complete review of its policy of excluding suspects' profiles from automated DNA data exchange by 15 June 2020. If, by this date the United Kingdom does not notify that it has reviewed its policy, the Council will within three months, re-evaluate the situation with regard to the continuation or termination of DNA data exchange with the United Kingdom. 3. Review clause Similar to Council implementing Decision 2019/968, in the proposed draft decision the Council, aware of this anomaly, reiterates the “practical and operational significance of the inclusion of suspects’ profiles in automated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • European Culture: Identity and Diversity
    European Culture: Identity and Diversity Colloquy of the Council of Europe in cooperation with the French Minister of Culture and Communication and the City of Strasbourg Summary Strasbourg, 8 – 9 September 2005 Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art European Culture: Identity and Diversity Colloquy of the Council of Europe in cooperation with the French Minister of Culture and Communication and the City of Strasbourg Summary Strasbourg, 8 – 9 September 2005 Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art Provisional version Council of Europe Directorate General IV – Education, Culture and Heritage, Youth and Sport 67075 Strasbourg Cedex France Tel. +33 388 41 20 00 Fax +33 388 41 27 50 www.coe.int October 2005 4 Contents Introduction...............................................................................................................................7 Programme...............................................................................................................................9 Opening session.....................................................................................................................11 Mr. Terry Davis, Secretary General of the Council of Europe ............................................................................. 11 Mr. Benoît Paumier, French Ministry of Culture and Communication ................................................................. 13 Mrs. Fabienne Keller, Mayor of Strasbourg ......................................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON STATEMENT on the US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021
    COMMON STATEMENT ON THE US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021 The EU and the US wine sectors play a critical role in supporting a vibrant transatlantic trade relationship. This sector is an essential driving force for many rural economies and for a significant number of medium and small enterprises. The undersigned deeply regret that the wine sector, as a notable industry in our two economies is sometimes caught in the crosshairs of unrelated trade disputes, causing economic damage to producers, and putting the millions of jobs that they support at risk. Consumers are also victims of those trading conflicts, which can lead to higher prices and reduced consumer choice. We urge the European Union and the US to resolve current trade disputes, to stop any related retaliatory action against wine exports, and to strengthen their bilateral partnership in order to avoid any sanctions against those sectors, including in the context of the current World Trade Organization Large Civil Aircraft Airbus-Boeing disputes. As legislators and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic, we acknowledge the importance and benefits of strengthening this bilateral partnership. Both the U.S. and the EU are each other’s largest export markets, with the total wine trade reaching more than $5.3 billion (€4.5 billion) annually, creating jobs and investment and supporting sustainable agriculture on both sides of the Atlantic. We ask our governments to further support the economic vitality and diversity of our wine sectors by working to remove all tariffs on wine to achieve a “zero for zero” wine trade environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the European Court of Justice Case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield
    The European Court of Justice case of Breyer Mr. Alan S. Reid Sheffield Hallam University Abstract This case note analyses the impact and significance of the European Court of Justice decision in Breyer. The European Court of Justice has expanded the definition of personal data to include dynamic IP addresses. The judgment improves the privacy situation of internet users across the European Union. The facts of Breyer1 Patrick Breyer is a German politician and activist who belongs to the Pirate Party. The Pirate Party was originally set up in Sweden in 2006, as a single issue political party, committed to the modernisation of copyright law in Sweden, following the crackdown on The Pirate Bay peer-to-peer network. After limited success in Sweden, sister parties sprung up across Europe, in order to capitalise on the notoriety of The Pirate Bay. In order to broaden their appeal, the European Pirate Parties set out common themes of campaigning interest, in particular, on issues surrounding the internet, such as open access to information, freedom of expression and privacy. As a technophile and politician committed to internet freedoms, Patrick Breyer vociferously objected to various Federal German government websites retaining details of his dynamic Internet Protocol (IP) address after he had completed browsing. Internet Protocol (IP) addresses are the essential backbone of the internet. Internet protocols are the method by which interconnected computers and devices communicate, share and transfer data between themselves. An IP address consists of either four pairs of numbers (version 4)2 separated by three colons or eight pairs of numbers separated by six colons (version 6).3 The US organisation ICANN4, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering, is tasked with overseeing the interconnectivity and compatibility required for the continued successful operation of the internet infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Europee, Pd: Per Ogni Euro Speso in Sicurezza Investire 1 Euro in Cultura
    23 maggio 2019 15:19 Europee, Pd: Per ogni euro speso in sicurezza investire 1 euro in cultura Il Partito democratico si presenta alle europee con la lista unitaria “Pd-Siamo Europei”, con un simbolo comune per il Pd guidato da Nicola Zingaretti e il manifesto/movimento di Carlo Calenda. I capilista del Pd sono Giuliano Pisapia, Carlo Calenda, Simona Bonafé, Franco Roberti e Caterina Chinnici. Nel programma dem alle elezioni europee si parla di cultura nei capitoli dedicati a istruzione e sicurezza. Nello specifico, il Pd rilancia l’idea di una Carta europea dello studente: “Entro il 2021 - si legge nel programma - attuare la nostra proposta di una E-Card dello studente per accedere in tutta Europa a facilitazioni, prestazioni e servizi (alloggi, musei, teatri, librerie e altri servizi culturali)”. Per il Pd, inoltre, la cultura è un’alleata per “garantire la sicurezza” e “la piena integrazione sociale di tutti i cittadini, a cominciare dai giovani”: la proposta che i dem rilanciano (ne parlava già Matteo Renzi quando era premier) è di “investire 1 euro in cultura per ogni euro speso in sicurezza”. LE BATTAGLIE TARGATE PD IN EUROPA Europa Creativa, importazione di beni culturali, Anno europeo del patrimonio culturale: molte le battaglie che negli ultimi anni hanno visto proprio il Partito democratico scendere in campo per una nuova politica culturale europea. L’Anno europeo per il patrimonio culturale (2018) è stato un successo europeo e italiano. L’eurodeputata Silvia Costa si è infatti battuta fin dal 2014, come presidente della commissione Cultura del Parlamento europeo, affinché venisse dedicato un anno tematico al patrimonio culturale (l’unico organizzato dalla Commissione Juncker).
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz
    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
    [Show full text]