DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Safety Committee Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Safety Committee Agenda PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: December 18, 2019 LOCATION: City Hall Conference Room TtrME: 4:00 P.M. I. CAIL TO ORDER II. ANNOUNCE MEMBERS IN A'|'TENDANCE (VERIFY QUORUM) II]. ADOP]'ION OF MINUTES: October 16.2019 IV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS I . Building & Codes Department: Monthly Reports 2. Police Department: Monlhly Reports 3. Fire Rescue: Monthly Reports COMMITTEE ACTION REQUIRED None VI. CITY COLTNCIL ACTION REQUIRED ORDINANCH 49-2019-20: AN ORDINANCH TO AMEND THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO A PROHIBITION ON ELECTRIC MOTORIZED BICYCLES. SCOOTERS, AND SKATEBO ARDS (Councilman lkileman) VII. OTHER None VIli. ADJOTJRNMENT IX. PUBLIC COMMENTS 1) Recovery S;,raposium presentation by April Bames. RN, Director of Outreach at The Next Door Treatment Center (Councilman Richmond) PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 16,2019 - 4:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Attending Committee Members: Councilman Jeff Henley, Chairman; Councilman Erb, Councilman Travis Holleman; Councilman Vonde[1 Richmond: Councilwoman Wanda Smith Others Present: Mayor Joe Pitts, Fire Chief Freddie Montgomery, Police Chief Alonzo Ansley, Building & Codes Interim Director David Smith, Richard Stevens, Kathy Gray The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chairman Henley and it was noted there was a quorum. Minutes from the Scptember 18,2019 meeting were approved by the committee after a motion was made by Councilwoman Smith and seconded bv Councilman Richmond. BUILDING & CODES: -Mr. Smith stated that he would answer any questions regarding the monthly reports Commercial permits are tracking as usual. Permits are up on building, and are close in volume to two years ago. Codes has slowed down, probably due to a reduction in grass growing. Councilwoman Smith asked about the schedule for mowing and he said that the abatement crews mow Monday through Friday from 7am until 2:30pm. They have expanded the hours for contraetors this month. They are going paperless on inspections next week. They have had the software for some time and are now starting to use it. Councilwoman Smith asked how long citizens have to comply with codes violations. Mr. Smith said that they give l3 days on grass violations and then it takes three to four days to get to them. Housing code violations are given 30 days and junk cars are given 15 to 20 days. If not comected, violations are taken to City Court. Councilman Hcnley asked about the criteria on high grass and Mr. Smith said l3 inches is a violation. Councilman Richmond met with Animal Control regarding a recent report of a citizen operating a kennel. They do not think she is running a kennel and will conduct monthly visits. They may limit the numbcr of dogs allowable in the future. Councilman Henley asked if September multi-family figures were a record number and Mr. Smith said they processed out more than usual. POLICE DEPARTMENT: -Chief Ansley presented monthly reports and asked for questions He noted there were several businesses cited for beer sales. Mentioncd that the Lcadership Clarksville Law, Crimc & Justicc Day went very wsll last week. Councilwoman Smith is a current member and she said that the class and training were outstanding. Councilman Henley mentioned the high number of vehicle burglaries and asked about a recent Idlewood Drive burglary. Chief Ansley said that is a cument major problem and he will check into that burgtary. He invited the committee to attend Crimeview meetings held every other Friday moming at 7am in the basement at CPD Headquarters. Mr. Stevens said that he sent a news release today regarding a Holiday Crime Prevention program urging residents to "Park Smart" and offering tips on holiday safety. Councilman Richmond mentioned that he went by the Police Headquarters recently and scheduled a meeting with Chief Ansley and a tour of some of the facilities next Tuesday. He suggested that others do so and Chief encouraged them to. FIRE DEPARTMENT: -Chief Montgomery gave a review ofthe monthly reports and asked for questions. Noted there were over 12,000 runs last month (5% fires), and $600,000 in property loss. Councilman Henley said in looking at past months it seems that runs are higher now. Chief Montgomery said that he will doublc check the numbers but it may be that this repofi includes five weeks. Mayor Pitts said that there is possibly morc accountability in rcporting now than in past months. Chief Montgomery gave a breakdown report to the Committec, highlighting on rhe following items: He stated that the drone has been delivered. Capt. Rios is currently in PIO training. He is startinglo look at garage building design with David Smith. They arc working on a better procedure for rracking work orders. He stated that training is very important and is a priority. They are working with the school system Stem Program. Three fire fighters who are on the Blue Way team recently went for training in Kentucky. The first phase of training was free and he commended the team for their initiative. He is working on tweaking the criteria lor employei evaluations. They are launching a Mental Health Monday safeqr program. Thcy are working with Human Resources on improving their promotion process. CITY COT]NCIL ACTION REQUIRED "A Resolution authorizing retirement of a Patrol Service Dog "Koda" from K-9 Unit and donation to Police Officer Keith Jones" Chief Ansley stated that Koda is nine years old today and was involved in an accident that left him with a spinal injury, unable to use his hind legs, preventing him from performing duties ofa Patrol Service Dog. He is aiking that Koda be retired and donated to his handler, Officer Keith Jones. We will compensate him a small amouni for veterinarian cost and food. The Resolution was approved by all after motion was made by Councilwoman Smith and seconded by Councilman Holleman. Chief Ansley said that a non-profit organization, Spike's K-9", is sponsoring a fund to provide medical assistance to Koda. They are not invoived witlithe Cityorthe CpD. DISCUSSION REGARDING CHANGING THE TIME OF BEER SALES ON SUNDAY Councilman Holleman said that he is working with City Attomey Lance Baker to draft an ordinance changing the time ofbeer sales on Sunday f'rom noon to l0:00 a.m. The City regulates beer sales and the State r.grLt.i liquor and wine sales. Currently, pursuant to state law, liquor and wine may be purchased on Sundays starting at l0:00 a.m. and he would like to see all alcohol sales consistent. It will have to go before the City CounciI but he would like to poll the committee today and get rheir thoughts. Chief Ansley .aid fro- a law enfbrcement standpoint he has no objections. Councilwoman Smith said that as a minister, she is opposed to the change and feels that the ministers in Clarksville will object. Councilman Richmond is also in ofposition frorn a peisonal standpoint. Councilman Holleman said hc supports it from a business aspect and hii talked to several local business owners who would like to see the change. Councilman Erb asked if we could change the process to abide by the State law on beer sales so the City will not have to regulate it. Councilman Holleman will check with Lance Baker on that and report back. There was no furthcr business Councilman Holleman made a motion to adjoum and Councilman Richmond seconded the motion. Submitted by: Kathy Gray Clarksville Police Department BUILDING + CODES DEPARTMENT CLARKSV LLE IENNESSEE'S I a I MEMORANDUM TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: David Smith Interim Director RE Statistical and Rer enue Data DATE: December 18,2019 Enclosed herewith please find a comparison of the total number of permits issued for ne\n construction to include the estimated cost of construction for the 2017 and 2018 (January through December) calendar years, I am also enclosing a permit report for the 2019 calendar year. AIso included is a comparison of revenues received for City General during the 2011 l2}l8,20l8l2}l9 fiscal year and the 201912O20 fiscal year July through June. Ifyou have any questions or desire additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. DS:PDM l OO South Spring Street I Clarksville. TN 37O4O [931] 6,45-7 426 I Fax [931] 645-7 43O w\ /\ /. cityofclarksville. com COMMERCIAL PERMITS 20I7 MONTI,I NUMBER oF PERMITS COST OF CONSTRUCTION JANUARY l{l $1r,986,813.00 FEBRUARY l9 s4,867,800.00 MARCH 2-5 $ 17,590,r0r.00 APRIL l5 $9.362.414.00 MAY 29 $5,039.368.00 JUNE )l $20,57 | .492.00 JULY 2l s r6, r39,500.00 AUGUST il $ 13.991,078.00 SEPTEMBER 50 s6. t47.626.00 OCTOBER 29 $ t6,304,242.00 NOVEMBER l3 $2,864.806.00 DECEMBER tl s3.889.000.00 TOTALS 2U1 st28,754,240.00 COMMERCIAL PERMITS 20I8 MONTII NUMBER oF PERMITS COSTOF CONSTRUCTTON JANT]ARY 9 $ r.260.286.00 FEBRUARY l0 $ 1,354,2 r9.00 MARCTI i0 s20,378,397.00 APRII, l6 $5,294.335.00 MAY 24 $ r6,706.63 1.00 JUNE 26 $7.0.18. 105.00 JULY 28 $ 17,399.943.00 AtJGtJST ll $ | .778. 158.00 SEPTEMBER I8 s3,49 t ,522.00 OCTOBER 21 s5,669,s60.00 NOVEMBER l7 s2.965.61i.00 DECEMBER 26 $ r0,486.898.00 TOTAI,S 239 $83,833,667.00 COMMERCIAL PERM ITS 2OI9 MON'I}I NUMBER OF PERMITS COST OF CONSTRUCTION JANUARY l9 $3, r33.288.00 FEBRUARY 32 s3,368.010.00 MARCH $4,445,16r.00 APRIT- l6 s10,028.746.00 MAY 2.7 s4,965,490.00 JUNE l9 $3,492,807.00 JULY l9 s9,504,287.00 AUGUST 2t $3,422.253 .00 SEPTEMBER 30 $7,62 r,03 I .00 OCTOBER l5 $r6,759.7r6.00 NOVEMBER l9 $22.539,669.00 DECEMBER TOTAI,S 218 s66,7.10,789.00 MULTI FAMILY PERMITS 20I7 MONTH N UMBER OF PERMITS COST OF CONSTRUCTION JANUARY s810.000.00 I)EBRUARY 0 s0.00 MARCH l $ 1,020,000.00 APRIL 2t s3.290.000.00 MAY I $ 120,000.00
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HS Code Product Description 23012010 Fish Meal for Feed
    Note: All products that are classified in the 8‐digit subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule HS Code Product description 23012010 Fish meal for feed 26180010 Manganese slag produced by smelting steel 26190000 Slag, scum, scale and other waste generated from smelting steel 26209990 Mineral ash and residue containing other metals and compounds 27011100 Unformed anthracite, whether or not powdered 27011210 Unformed coking bituminous coal, whether or not powdered 27011290 Other bituminous coal not made, whether or not powdered 27011900 Other coal not made, whether or not powdered 27012000 Coal brick, briquettes and similar solid fuels made of coal 27021000 lignite 27022000 Finished brown coal 27030000 Peat (including peat for fertilizer) regardless of molding 27040010 Coal coke and semi-coke regardless of molding 27040090 Charcoal Gas, water gas, furnace gas and similar gases, except for petroleum gas and other hydrocarbon 27050000 gases Tar and mineral tar distilled from coal, lignite, or peat, whether or not dehydrated or partially 27060000 distillation, including reconstitution of tar 27071000 crude benzene 27072000 Crude toluene 27073000 Crude xylene 27074000 naphthalene Other aromatic mixtures, by volume of aromatics distilled at 250 ° C by volume (including loss) at 27075000 65% or more 27079100 creosote 27079910 phenol Other products obtained by distillation of coal tar; aromatics weighing more than non-aromatic 27079990 ingredients product 27081000 Asphalt from coal tar or other mineral tar 27082000 Bituminous coke derived
    [Show full text]
  • Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and Electric-Assisted Bicycle Manual
    Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and electric-assisted Bicycle Manual Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division www.mndriveinfo.org Minnesota Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and Electric-Assisted Bicycle Manual The Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division prepared this manual. Visit the Department of Public Safety Web site at www.mndriveinfo.org to access online versions of our driver’s manuals. PS30001-12 (2/11) About this Manual… This manual is about operating For more information on Minnesota motorcycles, motorized bicycles and driving laws and rules for all drivers, electric-assisted bicycles on Minnesota refer to the Minnesota Driver’s streets and highways. Manual. The first section concerns Minnesota This manual is printed by permission laws and requirements. For complete of the Minnesota Department of standards, consult Minnesota state Public Safety. statutes and rules. This document is This manual is prepared by the not a proper legal authority to cite Division of Driver and Vehicle Services in court. with permission of the Minnesota The second section (Operation Department of Public Safety. Manual) contains information on safe This information can be made motorcycling. The Operation Manual, available in alternative format to provided by the Motorcycle Safety individuals with disabilities. For Foundation, is not about Minnesota assistance, call 651-297-3298 or law — it is about riding smart and TTY 651-282-6555. staying safe. CONTENTS Preface Instruction Permit Process . .VI Rider Training..................I Skills Test ....................VI Duplicate Permits............. VII Motorcycles Vehicle Registration . VII License Endorsement and Permit . II Insurance Requirements ........ VII Permit Process . II Equipment Requirements ....... VII Skills Test ...................
    [Show full text]
  • High Efficiency Moped a MQP Proposal Submitted to the Faculty Of
    High Efficiency Moped A MQP Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering by ___________________________________ Tim Ellsworth Date: 10/11/2012 Approved: Prof. Kenneth Stafford, Major Advisor Prof. Cosme Furlong-Vazquez Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Objective ................................................................................................................................................. 12 History ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Component Selection .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda
    Members Jim Desmond, Chair Mayor, City of San Marcos (Representing North County Inland) Bill Sandke, Vice Chair Councilmember, City of Coronado (Representing South County) Georgette Gomez, Councilmember TRANSPORTATION City of San Diego Ron Roberts, Supervisor COMMITTEE County of San Diego Bill Baber AGENDA Vice Mayor, City of La Mesa (Representing East County) Catherine Blakespear Mayor, City of Encinitas (Representing North County Coastal) Friday, June 16, 2017 Harry Mathis, Chair 9 a.m. to 12 noon Metropolitan Transit System SANDAG Board Room John Aguilera, Vice Chair North County Transit District 401 B Street, 7th Floor Jim Janney San Diego San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Alternates AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Judy Ritter Mayor, City of Vista • ROSE CREEK BIKEWAY PROJECT: (Representing North County Inland) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL Mary Salas CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Mayor, City of Chula Vista (Representing South County) AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT 7 Mark Kersey, Councilmember City of San Diego • FY 2018 CLAIMS FOR TRANSPORTATION Bill Horn, Supervisor DEVELOPMENT ACT AND STATE TRANSIT County of San Diego ASSISTANCE Greg Cox, Supervisor County of San Diego • FIRST TransNet TEN-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE Jennifer Mendoza Mayor Pro Tem, City of Lemon Grove PROGRAM REVIEW (Representing East County) Ellie Haviland Councilmember, City of Del Mar (Representing North County Coastal) PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING Lorie Bragg Metropolitan Transit System YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Bill Horn / Mark Packard North County Transit District MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG April Boling San Diego County Regional Airport Authority MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on HYBRID VEHICLES Power Vehicle Type
    Case Study on HYBRID VEHICLES Power Power sources for hybrid vehicles include: Coal, wood or other solid combustibles Compressed or liquefied natural gas Electricity Electromagnetic fields, Radio waves Electric vehicle battery Human powered e.g. pedaling or rowing Hydrogen On-board or out-board rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) Petrol or Diesel fuel Solar Wind Vehicle type Two-wheeled and cycle-type vehicles Mopeds, electric bicycles, and even electric kick scooters are a simple form of a hybrid, as power is delivered both via an internal combustion engine or electric motor and the rider's muscles. Early prototypes of motorcycles in the late 19th century used the same principles to power it up. In a parallel hybrid bicycle human and motor power are mechanically coupled at the pedal drive train or at the rear or the front wheel, e.g. using a hub motor, a roller pressing onto a tire, or a connection to a wheel using a transmission element. Human and motor torques are added together. Almost all manufactured Motorized bicycles, Mopeds are of this type. In a series hybrid bicycle (SH) the user powers a generator using the pedals. This is converted into electricity and can be fed directly to the motor giving a chainless bicycle but also to charge a battery. The motor draws power from the battery and must be able to deliver the full mechanical torque required because none is available from the pedals. SH bicycles are commercially available, because they are very simple in theory and manufacturing. The first known prototype and publication of an SH bicycle is by Augustus Kinzel (US Patent 3'884'317) in 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Bikes and Scooters Snapshot of State Laws
    Electric Bikes and Scooters Snapshot of State Laws State legislators, including those in Montana, are examining state laws, analyzing the use of electronic bikes (e-bikes), and determining how best, if at all, to regulate their use on public streets and paths. According to the National Conference of State Legislature (NCSL), 33 states and the District of Columbia define e-bikes in law.1 Montana is included in that list. Montana law (61-8-102, MCA) defines e-bikes, or “electrically assisted bicycles” as a bicycle 61-8-602, MCA with two operational pedals with a motor attached propels the bicycle and a rider who weighs Traffic laws applicable to persons operating 170 pounds no faster than 20 miles an hour. Essentially, for the purposes of regulation and bicycles or mopeds. A person operating a bicycle or enforcement, an e-bike is treated as a bicycle. The state does not require license or moped is granted all of the rights and is subject to registration. And e-bikes may be ridden on roadways and bicycle paths. all of the duties applicable to the driver of any other vehicle by chapter 7, chapter 9, and this chapter Federal law provides guidance in terms of the manufacturing and sale of e-bikes in the nation. except for special regulations in this part or the Amendments to the Consumer Product Safety Commission passed by Congress in 2002 provide provisions of chapter 7, chapter 9, and this chapter a definition of e-bikes as “A two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an that by their nature cannot apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility and Signage for Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
    ACCESSIBILITY AND SIGNAGE FOR PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE Report and Recommendations May 2012 This report was developed by the California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative, a multi-stakeholder partnership working to ensure a strong and enduring transition to a plug-in electric vehicle marketplace. Members played a guiding and consulting role in developing the report, although individual organizations may not formally endorse every recommendation. The PEV Collaborative would like to thank Barbara Lee of the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District as the lead author of this report. The document was developed by volunteers of the Collaborative Working Groups and Collaborative staff. A special thanks to Dave Head of Sonoma County and Jim Helmer of LightMoves for their contributions. Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 2 May 2012 California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative James Boyd, 2012 Chairman Diane Wittenberg, Executive Director California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative Adrienne Alvord Bonnie Lowenthal Union of Concerned Scientists California State Assembly Robert Babik Richard Lowenthal General Motors Coulomb Technologies Forrest Beanum Ron Mahabir CODA Automotive Greenlots Janice Berman Marvin Moon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Los Angeles Department of Water and Power John Boesel Mary Nichols CALSTART California Air Resources Board Dan Bowermaster Diarmuid O’Connell Electric Power Research Institute Tesla Motors, Inc. Elisabeth Brinton Terry O'Day Sacramento Municipal Utility District NRG Energy Jack Broadbent Alex Padilla Bay Area Air Quality Management District California State Senate Dan Davids Colin Read Plug In America ECOtality Nancy Gioia Clifford Rechtschaffen Ford Motor Company Office of Governor Edmund G.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations of E-Bikes in North America
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITIES REPORT Regulations of E-Bikes in North America NITC-RR-564 August 2014 A University Transportation Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation REGULATIONS OF E-BIKES IN NORTH AMERICA A POLICY REVIEW Report NITC-RR-564 by John MacArthur Portland State University Nicholas Kobel Portland State University for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 August 2014 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-564 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August 2014 REGULATIONS OF E-BIKES IN NORTH AMERICA: A POLICY REVIEW 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. John MacArthur, Portland State University Nicholas Kobel, Portland State University 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Portland State University 11. Contract or Grant No. 1825 SW Broadway Portland, OR 97201 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Throughout the world, the electric bicycle (e-bike) industry is growing very quickly. The North American market has been somewhat slow to adopt this technology, which is still considered to be in the “early adopter” phase (Rose & Dill, 2011; Rose, 2011), but in recent years, this has begun to change. But as e-bike numbers increase, so too will potential conflicts (actual or perceived) with other vehicles and non-motorized devices, bicycles and pedestrians, causing policy questions to arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Conversion to Motorized Bicycle (Moped) Affidavit of Owner Registry of Motor Vehicles P.O
    Bicycle Conversion to Motorized Bicycle (Moped) Affidavit of Owner Registry of Motor Vehicles P.O. Box 55889 Boston, MA 02205-5889 A. Requirements and Instructions Complete this affidavit only if you are converting a bicycle to a motorized bicycle. Attach completed affidavit to a completed Motorized Bicycle (Moped) Registration Application. If the bicycle has two or three wheels, an automatic transmission, a cylinder capacity of not more than 50 cubic centimeters, and a maximum speed of 30 MPH or less, it must be registered as a Motorized Bicycle. If the modified bicycle does not meet all of the requirements above, the RMV will not register it (as a moped, a motorcycle, or a “limited-use motorcycle”) and it cannot legally be operated on a public way while the motor is being operated. Low Speed Electric Bicycle If ALL of the following apply, a bicycle will be deemed a “low-speed electric bicycle” under Federal law (15 U.S.C. § 2085) and will not have to be registered with the RMV: Has two or three wheels Has fully operable pedals Has an electric motor of less than 750 watts (one horsepower) Has a maximum speed of less than 20 MPH on a paved level surface, when powered solely by the motor B. Applicant Information Owner/Registrant Last Name First Name Middle Initial Suffix Address Zip Street City State Code Email Address Phone # C. Vehicle Information Motor Purchased From Date of Purchase Serial # of Motor Brand Name of Bicycle Date Bicycle was Modified Description of Bicycle Bicycle Model Max. Speed (as modified) Horsepower Cylinder Capacity (if gas powered) Watts (if electric/battery powered) MPH Person or Business that Modified the Bicycle (if not yourself) Last Name First Name Middle Initial Suffix Address Zip Street City State Code The converted bicycle has An automatic transmission A cylinder capacity of not more than 50 cubic centimeters (CC’s) (check all that apply): A maximum speed of 30 miles per hour (MPH) or less Number of wheels on the ground: 2 3 Describe the nature of the modifications that were made to the bicycle: D.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Staff Analysis Bill #: Cs/Cs
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/CS/HB 971 Electric Bicycles SPONSOR(S): State Affairs Committee, Transportation & Infrastructure Subcommittee, Grant, M. TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 1148 REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 1) Transportation & Infrastructure Subcommittee 12 Y, 0 N, As CS Roth Vickers 2) Transportation & Tourism Appropriations 12 Y, 0 N Hicks Davis Subcommittee 3) State Affairs Committee 21 Y, 0 N, As CS Roth Williamson SUMMARY ANALYSIS In Florida, a bicycle means every vehicle propelled solely by human power, and every motorized bicycle propelled by a combination of human power and an electric helper motor capable of propelling the vehicle at a speed of not more than 20 miles per hour on level ground upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels, and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or two rear wheels. The term does not include such a vehicle with a seat height of no more than 25 inches from the ground when the seat is adjusted to its highest position or a scooter or similar device. Thus, the term includes both traditional bicycles and motorized or electric bicycles (e-bikes). The bill removes e-bikes from the definition of the term “bicycle” and creates a new definition for e-bikes using a three-tiered classification system. Class 1 e-bikes are bicycles equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the e-bike reaches 20 mph. Class 2 e-bikes are bicycles equipped with a throttle-assisted motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle and that ceases to provide assistance when the e-bike reaches 20 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • DSATS Active Transportation Plan Draft Plan As Of: June 3, 2019
    2019 DSATS Active Transportation Plan Draft Plan as of: June 3, 2019 DeKalb Sycamore Area Transportation Study DeKalb County 6/12/2019 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION SUBCOMMITTEE Amy Doll, DeKalb Park District (Chair) Joel Maurer, Live Health DeKalb County (Vice-Chair) Zac Gill, City of DeKalb Tammy Carson, DeKalb School District Lisa Gonzalez, DeKalb County John Heckmann, NIU Kevin Moore, NIU Student Association Mark Bushnell, City of Sycamore Daniel Gibble, Sycamore Park District Nancy Copple, Sycamore School District Max Sinclair, VAC DeKalb Sycamore Area Transportation Study ~ i ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the DeKalb-Sycamore Area Transportation Study ....................................... 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 The Active Transportation Plan .............................................................................................. 2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................... 3 Purpose Statement: ................................................................................................................ 3 GOAL 1: Complete the 2019 DSATS Active Transportation Plan ........................................... 3 GOAL 2: Encourage Collaboration ......................................................................................... 3 GOAL 3: Develop Best Practices ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Bill No. 357
    FIRST REGULAR SESSION HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE NO. 2 FOR SENATE BILL NO. 357 95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1606L.05C D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal sections 21.795, 142.800, 226.030, 301.010, 301.131, 301.150, 301.218, 301.310, 301.420, 301.440, 301.560, 301.716, 301.2998, 302.341, 302.545, 302.700, 302.735, 302.755, 302.775, 303.024, 304.155, 304.170, 304.260, 304.582, 307.010, 307.015, 307.090, 307.120, 307.125, 307.155, 307.172, 307.173, 307.195, 307.198, 307.365, 307.375, 307.390, 307.400, 311.326, 387.040, 556.021, 565.081, 565.082, and 565.083, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof eighty-one new sections relating to transportation, with penalty provisions. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Sections 21.795, 142.800, 226.030, 301.010, 301.131, 301.150, 301.218, 2 301.310, 301.420, 301.440, 301.560, 301.716, 301.2998, 302.341, 302.545, 302.700, 302.735, 3 302.755, 302.775, 303.024, 304.155, 304.170, 304.260, 304.582, 307.010, 307.015, 307.090, 4 307.120, 307.125, 307.155, 307.172, 307.173, 307.195, 307.198, 307.365, 307.375, 307.390, 5 307.400, 311.326, 387.040, 556.021, 565.081, 565.082, and 565.083, RSMo, are repealed and 6 eighty-one new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as sections 21.795, 142.800, 7 226.030, 226.222, 226.227, 227.295, 227.310, 227.311, 227.313, 227.368, 227.402, 227.407, 8 227.409, 227.410, 227.412, 301.010, 301.131, 301.150, 301.165, 301.218, 301.310, 301.420, 9 301.440, 301.560, 301.716, 301.2998, 301.3155, 301.3158, 301.4005, 301.4006,
    [Show full text]