DOCSLIB.ORG

Accessibility and Signage for Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACCESSIBILITY AND SIGNAGE FOR PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE Report and Recommendations May 2012 This report was developed by the California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative, a multi-stakeholder partnership working to ensure a strong and enduring transition to a plug-in electric vehicle marketplace. Members played a guiding and consulting role in developing the report, although individual organizations may not formally endorse every recommendation. The PEV Collaborative would like to thank Barbara Lee of the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District as the lead author of this report. The document was developed by volunteers of the Collaborative Working Groups and Collaborative staff. A special thanks to Dave Head of Sonoma County and Jim Helmer of LightMoves for their contributions. Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 2 May 2012 California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative James Boyd, 2012 Chairman Diane Wittenberg, Executive Director California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative Adrienne Alvord Bonnie Lowenthal Union of Concerned Scientists California State Assembly Robert Babik Richard Lowenthal General Motors Coulomb Technologies Forrest Beanum Ron Mahabir CODA Automotive Greenlots Janice Berman Marvin Moon Pacific Gas and Electric Company Los Angeles Department of Water and Power John Boesel Mary Nichols CALSTART California Air Resources Board Dan Bowermaster Diarmuid O’Connell Electric Power Research Institute Tesla Motors, Inc. Elisabeth Brinton Terry O'Day Sacramento Municipal Utility District NRG Energy Jack Broadbent Alex Padilla Bay Area Air Quality Management District California State Senate Dan Davids Colin Read Plug In America ECOtality Nancy Gioia Clifford Rechtschaffen Ford Motor Company Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. Elmer Hardy Michael Peevey Honda Motor Company California Public Utilities Commission Bonnie Holmes - Gen Carla Peterman American Lung Association in California California Energy Commission Roland Hwang Nancy Skinner Natural Resources Defense Council California State Assembly Enid Joffe Tom Turrentine Clean Fuel Connection, Inc. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis Christine Kehoe Eileen Tutt California State Senate California Electric Transportation Coalition Alex Kim Barry Wallerstein San Diego Gas and Electric South Coast Air Quality Management District Doug Kim V. John White Southern California Edison CEERT Andreas Klugescheid Jason Wolf BMW Group Representative Office California Better Place Barbara Lee Tracy Woodard Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District Nissan North America, Inc. Alan Lloyd Toshio Yoshidome International Council on Clean Transportation Toyota North America Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 3 May 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Purpose of Report and Intended Use 6 Background 7 Discussion of Projected PEV Fleet and Users 7 Overview of PEV Infrastructure Expansion 8 Accessible Charging 8 Identifying, Locating, and Designating Charging Stations 9 Recommended Guidelines 11 Accessible Electric Vehicle Parking 12 Accessible Electric Vehicle Charging 12 Installation with Construction of New Facilities 13 Installation at Existing Facilities 20 Installation of Accessible Card-reading Devices 28 Electric Vehicle Signage 30 General Service Signs 30 Regulatory Signs 32 Conclusions and Next Steps 34 Definitions 35 Endnotes 39 Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 4 May 2012 Executive Summary The California Plug-In Electric and should not be construed Vehicle (PEV) Collaborative to do so. provided recommendations and suggested actions to accomplish The PEV Collaborative the six goals outlined for PEV recommends accessibility market success in its 2010 report, standards for charging Taking Charge: Establishing infrastructure installed as part of California Leadership in the Plug-In the new construction of facilities, Electric Vehicle Marketplace. Two and also standards for installations of these goals relate to vehicle at existing facilities. The charging infrastructure. The first is recommended standards to simplify and prioritize home distinguish between charging that charging installations, and the is publicly available and charging second is to optimize the that is restricted in access (e.g., placement of non-residential residential). charging infrastructure. To achieve these two goals, the PEV The PEV Collaborative also Collaborative suggested several recommends standardized general actions that will benefit from early purpose signs to identify charging standardization on issues such as stations and direct users to the charging accessibility, and signage stations, and regulatory signs to to locate, identify, and restrict the designate the permissible uses of use of charging facilities. To the charging facilities and to advance these actions, the PEV prohibit certain uses where Collaborative established a necessary. All regulatory signs Working Group on Infrastructure must be supported by appropriate Coordination to develop rules, ordinances, or policies. recommendations on accessibility and signage for plug-in electric To ensure that the intent of the vehicle charging infrastructure. main provisions of these recommendations is clearly This report provides a clear understood, this report includes delineation of the service provided definitions of key terms used. The by charging infrastructure and is report includes additional intended to ensure that charging is definitions that could be accessible and complies with incorporated into some of the federal and state requirements. supporting rules, ordinances, or The report also endorses standard policies that property owners or signs that comport with federal and local jurisdictions would need to put state requirements for highway and in place to implement some of the street signs. The report does not recommendations. provide any legal advice, however, Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 5 May 2012 Purpose of Report and Intended Use This report has been prepared by Among the efforts reviewed and members of California Plug-In incorporated are: the County of Electric Vehicle (PEV) Sonoma Electric Vehicle Charging Collaborative. The Station Program and Installation recommendations in this report are Guidelines,1 and Ready, Set, intended to encourage and support Charge, California! A Guide to EV- the efficient and effective Ready Communities2 by the Bay introduction of PEVs. In particular, Area Climate Collaborative. The this report recommends a PEV Collaborative members also consistent set of definitions of consulted with subject matter terms and infrastructure installation experts, PEV users, fleet guidelines for accessibility and managers, architects, accessibility signage with the intent that these specialists, and labor aspects of infrastructure installation organizations. will become more standardized and consistent across jurisdictions, This report includes making it more efficient and cost recommendations that can help effective. standardize and streamline the installation of charging In preparing these infrastructure for PEVs. These recommendations, the PEV recommendations are not Collaborative considered the regulatory. The report does not important work underway by provide legal advice, nor should it several groups that have emerged be construed to do so. It is also not into leadership roles in the early intended to endorse any particular installation of PEV infrastructure. product. Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 6 May 2012 Background To understand the importance and standardization of signage for necessity of providing accessible charging stations. PEV charging infrastructure and standardized signage to achieve Discussion of Projected PEV market success, it is valuable PEV Fleet and Users to examine the projected growth of Currently, the California market the PEV market and supporting accounts for 11% of annual new infrastructure in California, and the car sales nationally, at more than current state of accessible charging 1.1 million cars per year. By 2020, stations and signage. This section annual California car sales are discusses the projected expansion expected to grow to 1.7 million. of the PEV fleet and users, California also has a strong track provides an overview of PEV record for early adoption of green infrastructure expansion, describes vehicle technology, accounting for the concept of accessible charging, more than 20% of new hybrid and provides information about the electric vehicles sold in the Figure 1: A vision for sustained market expansion in California 1,000,000’s Cumulative PEVs CALIFORNIA PEVs CALIFORNIA 100,000’s Annual PEV Sales 10,000’s 2010 2020 Market Launch Market Growth Market Takeoff Source: California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative, Taking Charge: Establishing California Leadership in the Plug-In Electric Vehicle Marketplace (2010). Accessibility & Signage Report www.PEVCollaborative.org 7 May 2012 United States.3 A number of firms and organizations have prepared analyses of the future California market for electric vehicles. Estimates of market penetration in 2020 range from roughly 2% to almost 14%.4 The California Air Resources Board estimates electric vehicles will make up approximately 5% of new vehicle sales in California by 2020.5 As Figure 1 shows, if these projections for 2020 are borne out, annual sales of PEVs will be in the hundreds of
Recommended publications
  • POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES for ELECTRIC VEHICLES This Position Is Supported by the Following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee Members

    POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES for ELECTRIC VEHICLES This Position Is Supported by the Following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee Members

    POSITION STATEMENT: UNFAIR TAXES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES This position is supported by the following Drive Electric Minnesota Policy Committee members: Alliance for Transportation Electrification Minnesota Electric Vehicle Owners American Lung Association in Minnesota Minnesota Power City of Minneapolis Otter Tail Power Company Connexus Energy Plug In America Elk River Municipal Utilities Shift2Electric Fresh Energy Xcel Energy Great River Energy Electric vehicle (EV) users should pay their fair share for the use of Minnesota roads, but they should not pay MORE than owners of equivalent conventional vehicles or than their fair share. Upkeep for Minnesota’s roads relies significantly on the Highway Users Tax Distribution Fund, which is funded through a combination of fuel tax revenue (including gasoline tax and $75 EV tax), license fees (including registration taxes), and motor vehicle sales taxes. Auto parts sales taxes and other sources also provide funding.1 Why is Drive Electric Minnesota concerned about unfair new taxes on EVs? • EVs already pay more than their fair share. EV drivers currently pay a $75 annual tax in lieu of a gas tax in addition to paying more in motor vehicle sales tax and registration tax than someone buying a comparable gasoline vehicle. In total highway taxes, EV owners already pay more over the life of the vehicle than the average gas vehicle driver, as shown in figure 1. • Inconsistent with the user-pays principle: The current gas tax model assesses a fee on a driver based on their vehicle’s fuel economy (miles per gallon) and how much they drive. Drivers of vehicles with low fuel economy (few miles per gallon) need to fuel their tank more, as do drivers that drive a lot.
  • Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance

    Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance

    Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Singer, Mark. 2020. Plug-In Electric Vehicle Showcases: Consumer Experience and Acceptance. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-75707. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75707.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-75707 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicle Technologies Office. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S.
  • Written Remarks

    Written Remarks

    Plug In America 6380 Wilshire Blvd Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90048 323-372-1236 June 19, 2020 Nevada Legislative Committee on Energy 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4747 Submitted via email to Assemblywoman Daniele Monroe-Moreno ([email protected]); Senator Chris Brooks ([email protected]); and Marjorie Paslov-Thomas ([email protected]) Re: SCR 3 Transportation Funding Solutions Dear Chair Monroe-Moreno and Vice-Chair Brooks: On behalf of the electric vehicle (EV) drivers in Nevada that we represent, Plug In America would like to thank you for your leadership with the Senate Concurrent Resolution 3 (SCR3) process, particularly given these challenging times. EVs provide significant benefits to all Nevadans, and we urge you to take these benefits into account as you finalize the report on alternative solutions for transportation funding in Nevada, including what fees – if any – should be assessed to EV drivers in Nevada. Plug In America is the nation’s leading independent consumer voice for accelerating the use of EVs in the United States to consumers, policymakers, auto manufacturers and others. Formed as a non-profit in 2008, Plug In America provides practical, objective information collected from our coalition of plug-in vehicle drivers through public outreach and education, policy work and a range of technical advisory services. Our expertise represents the world’s deepest pool of experience of driving and living with plug­ in vehicles.1 The solutions to solving the immediate transportation funding shortfalls in Nevada – and also nationwide – require major shifts in how the funding has historically been implemented.
  • Electric Drive by '25

    Electric Drive by '25

    ELECTRIC DRIVE BY ‘25: How California Can Catalyze Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles by 2025 September 2012 About this Report This policy paper is the tenth in a series of reports on how climate change will create opportunities for specific sectors of the business community and how policy-makers can facilitate those opportunities. Each paper results from one-day workshop discussions that include representatives from key business, academic, and policy sectors of the targeted industries. The workshops and resulting policy papers are sponsored by Bank of America and produced by a partnership of the UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment. Authorship The author of this policy paper is Ethan N. Elkind, Bank of America Climate Policy Associate for UCLA School of Law’s Environmental Law Center & Emmett Center on Climate Change and the Environment and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE). Additional contributions to the report were made by Sean Hecht and Cara Horowitz of the UCLA School of Law and Steven Weissman of the UC Berkeley School of Law. Acknowledgments The author and organizers are grateful to Bank of America for its generous sponsorship of the workshop series and input into the formulation of both the workshops and the policy paper. We would specifically like to thank Anne Finucane, Global Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer, and Chair of the Bank of America Environmental Council, for her commitment to this work.
  • HS Code Product Description 23012010 Fish Meal for Feed

    HS Code Product Description 23012010 Fish Meal for Feed

    Note: All products that are classified in the 8‐digit subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule HS Code Product description 23012010 Fish meal for feed 26180010 Manganese slag produced by smelting steel 26190000 Slag, scum, scale and other waste generated from smelting steel 26209990 Mineral ash and residue containing other metals and compounds 27011100 Unformed anthracite, whether or not powdered 27011210 Unformed coking bituminous coal, whether or not powdered 27011290 Other bituminous coal not made, whether or not powdered 27011900 Other coal not made, whether or not powdered 27012000 Coal brick, briquettes and similar solid fuels made of coal 27021000 lignite 27022000 Finished brown coal 27030000 Peat (including peat for fertilizer) regardless of molding 27040010 Coal coke and semi-coke regardless of molding 27040090 Charcoal Gas, water gas, furnace gas and similar gases, except for petroleum gas and other hydrocarbon 27050000 gases Tar and mineral tar distilled from coal, lignite, or peat, whether or not dehydrated or partially 27060000 distillation, including reconstitution of tar 27071000 crude benzene 27072000 Crude toluene 27073000 Crude xylene 27074000 naphthalene Other aromatic mixtures, by volume of aromatics distilled at 250 ° C by volume (including loss) at 27075000 65% or more 27079100 creosote 27079910 phenol Other products obtained by distillation of coal tar; aromatics weighing more than non-aromatic 27079990 ingredients product 27081000 Asphalt from coal tar or other mineral tar 27082000 Bituminous coke derived
  • Clean Air Rule

    Clean Air Rule

    Small Business Economic Impact Statement Chapter 173-442 WAC Clean Air Rule Chapter 173-441 WAC Reporting of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases June 2016 Publication no. 16-02-009 Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1602009.html For more information contact: Air Quality Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: 360-407-6800 Washington State Department of Ecology – www.ecy.wa.gov o Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 Accommodation Requests: To request ADA accommodation including materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 360-407-6800. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability may call TTY at 877-833-6341. Small Business Economic Impact Statement Chapter 173-442 WAC Clean Air Rule Chapter 173-441 WAC Reporting of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases Prepared by Kasia Patora Shon Kraley, PhD Rules & Accountability Section Rules & Accountability Section WA Department of Ecology WA Department of Ecology Supporting work by: Carrie Sessions, Rules & Accountability Section, WA Department of Ecology Neil Caudill, Air Quality Program, WA Department of Ecology Bill Drumheller, Air Quality Program, WA Department of Ecology for the Air Quality Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ ii Chapter 1: Background and Introduction .......................................................................................
  • Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and Electric-Assisted Bicycle Manual

    Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and Electric-Assisted Bicycle Manual

    Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and electric-assisted Bicycle Manual Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division www.mndriveinfo.org Minnesota Motorcycle, Motorized Bicycle and Electric-Assisted Bicycle Manual The Minnesota Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division prepared this manual. Visit the Department of Public Safety Web site at www.mndriveinfo.org to access online versions of our driver’s manuals. PS30001-12 (2/11) About this Manual… This manual is about operating For more information on Minnesota motorcycles, motorized bicycles and driving laws and rules for all drivers, electric-assisted bicycles on Minnesota refer to the Minnesota Driver’s streets and highways. Manual. The first section concerns Minnesota This manual is printed by permission laws and requirements. For complete of the Minnesota Department of standards, consult Minnesota state Public Safety. statutes and rules. This document is This manual is prepared by the not a proper legal authority to cite Division of Driver and Vehicle Services in court. with permission of the Minnesota The second section (Operation Department of Public Safety. Manual) contains information on safe This information can be made motorcycling. The Operation Manual, available in alternative format to provided by the Motorcycle Safety individuals with disabilities. For Foundation, is not about Minnesota assistance, call 651-297-3298 or law — it is about riding smart and TTY 651-282-6555. staying safe. CONTENTS Preface Instruction Permit Process . .VI Rider Training..................I Skills Test ....................VI Duplicate Permits............. VII Motorcycles Vehicle Registration . VII License Endorsement and Permit . II Insurance Requirements ........ VII Permit Process . II Equipment Requirements ....... VII Skills Test ...................
  • High Efficiency Moped a MQP Proposal Submitted to the Faculty Of

    High Efficiency Moped a MQP Proposal Submitted to the Faculty Of

    High Efficiency Moped A MQP Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering by ___________________________________ Tim Ellsworth Date: 10/11/2012 Approved: Prof. Kenneth Stafford, Major Advisor Prof. Cosme Furlong-Vazquez Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 12 Objective ................................................................................................................................................. 12 History ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Component Selection .................................................................................................................................
  • Bay Area—Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan—Summary 2013 Executive Summary

    Bay Area—Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan—Summary 2013 Executive Summary

    California Energy Commission DOCKETED 14-IEP-1B TN 72532 AUG 04 2014 Bay Area Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan Summary 2013 December 2013 Prepared for In Partnership with Prepared by Disclaimer This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this document; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report was also prepared as a result of work sponsored, paid for, in whole or in part, by a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Award to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of SCAQMD or the DOE. The SCAQMD and DOE, their officers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report. The SCAQMD and DOE have not approved or disapproved this report, nor have the SCAQMD or DOE passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information contained herein. Acknowledgements The Bay Area is fortunate to have a broad and diverse set of contributors working to enable this region to support an accelerated adoption rate of plug-in electric vehicles between now and 2025. Stakeholders contributed to the preparation of this document by conducting targeted outreach and interviews and by providing key data and valuable feedback.
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda

    Meeting Notice and Agenda

    Members Jim Desmond, Chair Mayor, City of San Marcos (Representing North County Inland) Bill Sandke, Vice Chair Councilmember, City of Coronado (Representing South County) Georgette Gomez, Councilmember TRANSPORTATION City of San Diego Ron Roberts, Supervisor COMMITTEE County of San Diego Bill Baber AGENDA Vice Mayor, City of La Mesa (Representing East County) Catherine Blakespear Mayor, City of Encinitas (Representing North County Coastal) Friday, June 16, 2017 Harry Mathis, Chair 9 a.m. to 12 noon Metropolitan Transit System SANDAG Board Room John Aguilera, Vice Chair North County Transit District 401 B Street, 7th Floor Jim Janney San Diego San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Alternates AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Judy Ritter Mayor, City of Vista • ROSE CREEK BIKEWAY PROJECT: (Representing North County Inland) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL Mary Salas CONTRACTOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Mayor, City of Chula Vista (Representing South County) AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT 7 Mark Kersey, Councilmember City of San Diego • FY 2018 CLAIMS FOR TRANSPORTATION Bill Horn, Supervisor DEVELOPMENT ACT AND STATE TRANSIT County of San Diego ASSISTANCE Greg Cox, Supervisor County of San Diego • FIRST TransNet TEN-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE Jennifer Mendoza Mayor Pro Tem, City of Lemon Grove PROGRAM REVIEW (Representing East County) Ellie Haviland Councilmember, City of Del Mar (Representing North County Coastal) PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING Lorie Bragg Metropolitan Transit System YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Bill Horn / Mark Packard North County Transit District MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG April Boling San Diego County Regional Airport Authority MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making.
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities

    Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities

    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Investigation by the Department of Public Utilities D.P.U. 13-182 on its own Motion into Electric Vehicles and Electric Vehicle Charging JOINT COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF AUTHORITY BY ENE (ENVIRONMENT NORTHEAST), CHARGEPOINT, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, THE NEW ENGLAND CLEAN ENERGY COUNCIL, AND PLUG IN AMERICA ENE (Environment Northeast), ChargePoint, Conservation Law Foundation, the New England Clean Energy Council, and Plug In America (“Joint Commenters on Scope of Authority”) appreciate the opportunity to provide comments to the Department of Public Utilities (“Department”) in Docket 13- 182, Investigation by the Department of Public Utilities upon its own Motion into Electric Vehicles and Electric Vehicle Charging. The Joint Commenters represent a range of stakeholder interests, including perspectives from the environmental community, clean energy business community, the electric vehicle service equipment industry, and electric vehicle drivers and advocates. These joint comments address only a portion of the questions raised in this docket, specifically the issues around the Department’s proper scope of authority over electric vehicle charging stations, identified in Questions A.1-6 and E.1. The Order opening this investigation lays out the history leading up to the opening of this docket, particularly the activities that have taken place as a part of Docket 12-76 on Grid Modernization, the Massachusetts Electric Vehicle Initiative Task Force (“MEVI Task Force”), and inter-state discussions on electric vehicles and other zero-emissions vehicles. Several of the Joint Commenters have participated extensively in the deliberations of the MEVI Task Force as well as the Grid Modernization proceeding.
  • Plug in America 2370 Market Street, # 419 San Francisco, CA 94589 (415)323-3329

    Plug in America 2370 Market Street, # 419 San Francisco, CA 94589 (415)323-3329

    Plug In America 2370 Market Street, # 419 San Francisco, CA 94589 (415)323-3329 Testimony of Plug In America Submitted by Barry Woods, Board of Directors, Northeast Region To the Energy & Technology Committee for the Public Hearing on February 11, 2015 Relating to: Proposed H.B. No. 6030 AN ACT CONCERNING ZERO-EMISSION VEHICLES IN CONNECTICUT. Proposed H.B. No. 6031 AN ACT CONCERNING ELECTRIC VEHICLES. Thank you for the opportunity to submit these written comments to the Committee in support of H.B. No. 6030 and 6031. As the nation’s leading independent non-profit EV advocacy organization, Plug In America’s (PIA) mission is to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicle (EV) technology and provide support to current and potential Plug-in Electric Vehicle (PEV) drivers/owners. PIA was founded by EV drivers and aims to educate policy makers and the public with our objective, driver-based analysis. The most significant regional effort to promote PEVs in the US is the 8-state Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) process involving California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In the MOU initially signed in October 2013, these states committed to taking steps aimed at ensuring 3.3 million vehicles on the road by 2025. A follow up action plan released in May 2014 outlined 11 actions they could take in support of the MOU, ranging from providing incentives to spurring fleet purchases to promoting infrastructure. Notably, the top action identified was “Promote the availability and effective marketing of all plug- in electric vehicle models in our states.” As a ZEV MOU signatory state, Connecticut is well positioned and should be strongly motivated to do its share in promoting PEV adoption by its citizens.