John Moultrie, Junior, M.D., 1729-1798*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John Moultrie, Junior, M.D., 1729-1798* JOHN MOULTRIE, JUNIOR, M.D., 1729-1798* ROYAL LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR OF EAST FLORIDA By ELEANOR WINTHROP TOWNSEND, M.D. CHARLESTON, S. C. OLONIAL history in Amer­ John Cranston,3 upon whom was con­ ica abounds in the names of ferred the first medical degree in Amer­ physicians who played im­ ica, by act of the Assembly of the Col­ portant parts in the political ony of Rhode Island and Providence Caffairs of their country. Many werePlantations men convening in 1663-64, of rare ability and versatility. Some served his colony not only as its lead­ continued through life the practice of ing physician and surgeon, but also as medicine, whether interrupted or ac­ attorney-general, as commander-in- companied by their activities as col­ chief of militia, and in other official onizers, governors, or military men, positions before becoming governor. while others became in the true sense To John Brooks,4 physician, colonel “medical truants” and forsook medi­ in the continental army, and later gov­ cine for other chosen Helds of interest ernor of Massachusetts, James Thacher, and service. It is not strange that these better known for his “American Med­ men should have been called upon to ical Biography,” dedicated his work en­ share largely in guiding the destinies of titled “A Military Journal during the the country in those rigorous times, in American Revolutionary War, from view of the self-discipline and the men­ 1775 to °f which President tal stimulus which education for their Adams wrote, “It is the most natural, profession must necessarily have simple, and faithful narrative of facts brought to them. John Quincy wrote that I have seen in any history of that in 1719, “Of all the Studies which em­ period.” ploy the Faculties of reasonable Men, Among the colonial physicians who none open the Mind more, or give it a Filed executive positions was John juster Turn of Thinking, than Phys- Moultrie, Junior, Royal Lieutenant- ick.”1 Governor of East Florida, son of Dr. Physicians were numbered among John Moultrie of Charles Towne, the early governors and members of South Carolina, and brother of Gen­ governing councils of the colonies from eral William Moultrie who in command New England to the southernmost. Be­ of a few strategically placed troops de­ fore serving his colony in executive ca­ fended Charles Towne harbor against pacity, Governor Edward Winslow2 of the attacking British fleet in 1776. The Massachusetts had saved it from a first of his distinguished family to be threatened Indian massacre and possi­ born in America, he was the first na­ ble annihilation, by the good will he tive American to be graduated in med­ incurred in attending the chief, Massas- icine from Edinburgh University.5,6 soit, during a serious illness. Captain Of ancient Scottish lineage, his an­ * Read before the Medical History Club, Charleston, S. C., December 9, 1937. cestors were Lairds of Seafield, Mar­ parish of Culross, Shire of Eife. His kinch, and Roscobie, in whose history only son, John, born there in 1702. was adventure and romance are not lack­ educated at Edinburgh, became a sur­ ing. One John Multrare (one of six geon in the British Navy, “that his different spellings of the same name in theoretical knowledge might be per­ old MSS and charters7) who succeeded fected and confirmed by practice and to the title in 1540, was the bitter observation at the bedside of his pa­ enemy of his neighbor James Kirk­ tients,”8 and emigrated to Charlestown caldy of Grange, and their enmity be­ in 1728. On the twenty-second of April came a link in the chain of political of that year, the Register of St. Philip’s events which bound Mary Queen of Parish, Charlestown, South Carolina, Scots more firmly to her doom. This records his marriage to Lucretia John had received from Mary by Royal Cooper, daughter of Dr. Barnard Chris­ Charter, in 1547, four acres of land tian Cooper, of Goose Creek. held until then by Kirkcaldy, whose There were four sons of this mar­ hostility to the Queen was so deeply riage. John, the eldest, born January stirred thereby that when she became 18, 1729, became lieutenant-governor, the target of accusations following in 1771, of His Majesty’s Province of upon the murder of Darnley, Kirk­ East Florida and held that office caldy devised a caricature of her under throughout the Revolution. James the Moultrie crest. As Miss Strickland having been attorney-general of the (“Lives of the Queens of England") Province of South Carolina, became writes: Chief Justice of East Florida. William, Mary was peculiarly annoyed at one of the third son, for whom Fort Moultrie these gross personal caricatures called The is named in honor of his defense of Mermaid which represented her in the Charlestown Harbor, became a major- character of a crowned syren, with a scep­ general in the Revolutionary Army tre formed of a fish’s tail in her hand, and and later the governor of the state of Hanked with the royal initials m.r. South Carolina. Thomas, a captain in a striking likeness of Mary’s lovely fea­ the Revolutionary Army, was killed in tures . with melancholy expression. the siege of Charlestown in 1780. In the description of the Moultrie By his second marriage, to Elizabeth arms entered in the Lyon Office Rec­ Mathewes, Dr. John Moultrie had one ords, Edinburgh, a.d. 1672-76. is found son, Alexander, who became the first the statement: “A wreath of his col- attorney-general of the state of South lours is set for his crest, a Mermaid Carolina. proper.” Ebe father of this distinguished The estate of Roscobie, bought in group of sons, Dr. John Moultrie, the 1631 by one Robert Moultrie, who emigrant to Charlestown, entered thor­ sold Seafield and Markinch, was sold oughly into the life of his community about 1800 by Catherine Moultrie to and his profession. In 1729 his name William Adam, Escp, the friend of Sir appears as one of the founders of the Walter Scott.7 St. Andrews Society, of which later he John Moultrie, a second son of served as president from 1760 to 1771, James Moultrie (1686-1710) whose eld­ the year of his death. He was a member est son James inherited the estate, mar­ of the Charles Towne Library Society ried Catherine Craik and lived in the and a vestryman of St. Michael’s Church. He is recorded in 1734 as hav­ and in an unusual number of cases pro­ ing been paid by St. Philip’s vestry for duced fatal consequences. He was hospital services; in 1747 and again in the idol of his patients. ... So great was 1759 as quarantine officer; in 1760, as the confidence reposed in his judgment, having inoculated on February 11 all that they who were usually attended by the family of Robert Pringle, smallpox him, preferred his advice and assistance, even on the festive evening of St. An­ having appeared in January; and in drew’s Day, to that of any other profes­ 1763 as a signer of the inoculation sional man in his most collected mo­ promise. This was an agreement, in ments. response to the accusation that the phy­ sicians were perpetuating the disease As the eldest son of a prominent by inoculating, to discontinue inocula­ physician, John Moultrie, Junior, tion for six months provided no one turned naturally to medicine and at inoculated in any way. The thirteen seventeen years of age, on May 23, names signed to this document have 1746, he sailed from Charlestown to been said to be a list of the reputable study abroad. Naturally too, he chose practitioners of the time there.9 Edinburgh as his destination; and so In the South Carolina Gazette of it would appear that both father and Thursday, June 5, 1755, we may read son came within the sphere of influ­ that “on Monday, the 2nd instant, met ence of the great Alexander Monro, at Mr. Gordon’s, the Faculty of Phys- who, having returned to Edinburgh in ick, (Doct. John Moultrie, President)’’ 1719 after studying in London and on which occasion were passed resolu­ Paris and with Boerhaave in Leyden, tions “for the better Support of the had begun in 1720 his lectures in anat­ Dignity, the Privileges, and Emolu­ omy and surgery in the newly estab­ ments of their humane Art.” lished university where he was to con­ The account of his life given by tinue for nearly forty years.10 Holding Thacher brings before us certain fea­ one of the two professorships estab­ tures not only of the character of the lished to initiate a course in medicine elder Dr. Moultrie but of the thought within the University of Edinburgh, of his times. Monro made his lectures widely com­ prehensive. Beginning each year with He . for forty years stood at the the history of anatomy, he proceeded to head of his profession in that city. He possessed great talents for observation, osteology, normal and pathological; and was wonderfully successful in dis­ muscles, nerves, and vessels, including covering the hidden causes of diseases their pathology; comparative anatomy and adopting remedies for their removal. with demonstrations; surgery and His death was regretted as a great pub­ bandaging; and general lectures on lic calamity. Several of the ladies of physiology. “Young anatomists’ imagi­ Charlestown bedewed his grave with tears, nation,” he said, “cannot follow a long and went into mourning on the occasion. chain of descriptions, especially when The year after his decease was distin­ they are not taught at the same time guished by the deaths of several women in childbirth.
Recommended publications
  • Caroliniana Columns - Fall 2016 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society Newsletter - South Caroliniana Library Columns Fall 2016 Caroliniana Columns - Fall 2016 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/columns Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Columns, Issue 40, Fall 2016". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/columns/40/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society Newsletter - Columns by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University South Caroliniana Society newsletter Fall 2016 Cokie Roberts Season’s greetings from the South Caroliniana Library (Photograph courtesy of the University Creative Services) Summer Scholars Find Treasures in the South Caroliniana Library The South Caroliniana Library serves many constituents, sharing its unique collections with University students and faculty, local historians and genealogists, and a multitude of researchers from around the world both in person and via its online resources. Each summer the Library welcomes budding researchers to its Sumer Scholars program which includes visiting fellowships and professorships from several sources. This summer the researchers and their assistantships included: Jacob Clawson, Ph.D. candidate, Auburn University, Governor Thomas Gordon McLeod and First Lady Elizabeth Alford McLeod Research Fellow Kevin Collins, Professor of Language and Literature, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, William Gilmore Simms Visiting Research Professor Mandy L. Cooper, Ph.D. candidate, Duke University, Lewis P. Jones Research Fellow Lauren Haumesser, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston County South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN
    Snee l"a.rm Ncar 'liOW1t Pleasant HiiBS !l0. Se-87 Charleston County South Carolina \"~ /\ E; ~;: L ., ..... ~',.-. • i 0' . ['i.>l(>. Ii ,\ PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORIC AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • District of South Carolina Historic American Buildings Survey Prepared at Washington Office for Southeast Unit HJ..Bf No .. S::;EF~ FARi,,; Ner<.r :,~ount Pleasant, Chp<rlestC!l County I South Ca.rolina Ouic or ercctlon: c. 1750 Present co'~dition: Excellent frDJ:O construction; rectanc),lo..r plan; marble mantel, Adam de- sign .. A,lditc.onal data, One-ti:r.e horne of Colone 1 Charles Pinckney. ,'!as in Pinckney fami ly for sevent:! years • Othe~ e~~stinG !,ccords: .~ •• Cr,.arleston l:useu.T.1 Prepared by Junior Architect James L .. Burnett, Jr .. , " Approved :' Ii \,}.. J 4/! -;c. " Addendum To: SNEE FARM HABS NO. SC-87 1240 Long Point Road • Charleston Coun~y South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • REDUCED COPIES OF IfEASURED DRAHINGS • Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Department of the Interior • Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 ~A6S 5(. , \O-(i\ouf)v HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY j ~) - SNEE FARM • HABS NO. SC-87 Location: 1240 Long Point Road, Mt. Pleasant, Charleston County, South Carolina 4.6 miles NE of Mt. Pleasant on US Hwy 17; turn left on County Road 97 (Long Point Road); continue 0.7 mile and turn left on dirt road; house is 0.1 mile down dirt road on left. UTM: 17.609960.3634640 Present Owner: National Park Service Present Use: Vacant Significance: The Charles Pinckney Historic Site, known traditionally as "Snee Farm," is the ancestral country seat of Charles pinckney III, the American patriot and statesman.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLEGROUND of FREEDOM No State Made a Greater Contribution to the Winning of America
    A~ '562. 2 .· ~\l-2. C'op~ \ BATTLEGROUND OF FREEDOM No state made a greater contribution to the winning of America. Both Kosciusko and Count Pulaski, the Polish independence and the founding of the nation than South patriots, served with distinction in South Carolina. ·Carolina. Her sons served ably and well in the Con­ For nearly four years, South Carolina was spared the tinental Congress and many of her sons laid down their horrors of war, then Charleston fell in May, 1780, and lives on the altar of freedom so that liberty and in­ South Carolina became a conquered province. Except for dependence could be achieved. Her heroine daughters Marion, Sumter and Pickens and their gallant followers, are legends of the land. it seemed all was lost. After Camden, the tide began to Upon the soil of South Carolina more battles were turn with Musgrove's Mill, Hanging Rock, King's Moun­ fought than in any other state. Both Virginia and tain and Blackstock's. In October, Nathanael Greene, the Massachusetts have been referred to as "The Cradle of fighting Quaker from Rhode Island, was given command Liberty." South Carolina was "The Battleground of of the Continental troops in the South. Daniel Morgan, an Freedom." Men from many states and nations came to epic soldier of great courage, returned to active duty, In South Carolina and fought and died. Where they fought, 17'81, the British suffered a major defeat at Cowpens. The bled and died is sacred ground, consecrated by the blood Battles of Ninety Six, Hobkirk's Hill, and most promi­ of patriots.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2008 Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bright, Walter, "Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866" (2008). All Theses. 363. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/363 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RADICALSIM AND REBELLION: PRESIDENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA APRIL 1865 TO MAY 1866 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Walter Steven Bright May 2008 Accepted by: Dr. Rod Andrew Jr., Committee Chair Dr. H. Roger Grant Dr. Abel A. Bartley ABSTRACT The focus of this thesis deals primarily with the white elite of South Carolina during Presidential Reconstruction. Historians have noted South Carolina radicalism before the Civil War, but I propose that this radicalism did not simply fade away when the war ended. I argue that the Civil War did not destroy white South Carolinians’ will to fight; a sense of nationalism still flourished as they continued to rebel against the federal government, despite the devastating effects of the war on the Palmetto State. This work will show that these white elites continued this fight because they were enraged over the total devastation left in the wake of Sherman’s march through the state and the failure of the federal government to institute an acceptable Reconstruction plan.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Rutledge • John Rutledge
    South Carolina’s Founding Fathers www.carolana.com © 2018 – J.D. Lewis Little River, SC Terms of Use: Any or all parts of this slideshow may be used by anyone for any purpose free of charge – with one stipulation. The user must cite “www.carolana.com” as the source and may not alter any material used. 2 Table of Contents Topic Slide No. Quick Lookback at Representative Gov’t 4 SC Quick Lookback (1629 to 1775) 10 The American Revolution (1775 to 1783) 32 SC Joins the United States (1783 to 1790) 92 Sources 140 Appendix A – Founding Fathers From 143 Each District / Parish 3 Quick Lookback at Representative Government 4 Ancient Democracies, Republics & Constitutions • Athenian democracy developed around the fifth century BC in the Greek city-state of Athens. Spread to other city-states. • It was a system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. This was not considered to be a “representative government,” however. • To vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a slave, or a woman. • Leaders elected at random by citizens. • Solonian Constitution drafted in 594 BC. Greek Senate c. 450 BC • Indian City State of Vaishali functioned as what would be called a Republic. There were other similar city-states, all in northern India. • Decision making by voting of two primary groups: Martial or warrior class Trade guilds/agriculturists class • Code of Manu issued in 3rd Century BC. North Indian Assembly c.400 BC • Two Consuls – executive leaders • Senate comprised of 300 upper class citizens • Tribune comprised of 10 lower class citizens • Citizen Assemblies (adult males only) • Two-party system – Patricians & Plebians • Leaders elected lower members • Considered to be a Republic • 12 Tables (constitution-like) codified in 450 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina in the American Revolution
    South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 21, 2004 – April 9, 2005 his catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the Texhibition South Carolina in the American Revolution on display from October 21, 2004, to April 9, 2005, at Anderson House, Headquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20008. The exhibition is the eighth in a series focusing on the eft mainly to her own resources, contributions to the American Revolution made by the original it was through bloodshed thirteen states and the French alliance. L and devastation and the depths Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the of wretchedness that [South Carolina’s] Society of the Cincinnati of the State of South Carolina. citizens were to bring her back to her place in the republic by their own heroic courage Also available: and self devotion, having suffered more, Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) and dared more, and achieved more New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) than the men of any other state. Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) — George Bancroft, (2002) Delaware in the American Revolution History of the United States (1857) Georgia in the American Revolution (2003) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark Front cover illustration: Captain Jacob Shubrick by Henry Benbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Memorialization and the Old South's Reckoning with Modernity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2021 "Epic Poems in Bronze": Confederate Memorialization and the Old South's Reckoning with Modernity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Grace Ford-Dirks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the African American Studies Commons, American Art and Architecture Commons, American Studies Commons, Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ford-Dirks, Grace, ""Epic Poems in Bronze": Confederate Memorialization and the Old South's Reckoning with Modernity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1697. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1697 This Honors Thesis -- Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ford-Dirks 1 “Epic Poems in Bronze:” Confederate Memorialization and the Old South’s Reckoning with Modernity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of History from William & Mary by Grace M. Ford-Dirks Accepted for Highest Honors Molly Swetnam-Burland _______________________ Dr. Molly Swetnam-Burland Frederick Corney ___________________________ Dr. Frederick Corney Williamsburg, VA May 12, 2021 Ford-Dirks 2 Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction ………………………………………………………………….. 3 Chapter Two: Mourning Memorialization (1865 - 1880) …………………………………. 14 Chapter Three: Vindication In Urban Spaces (1881 - 1918) ……………………………… 57 Chapter Four: Commercialized Memorialization and Historic Preservation (1919 - 1940) …………………………………… 113 Chapter Five: Conclusion …………………………………………………………………… 164 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Huguenots in Colonial South Carolina, 1680-1740
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 The Evolution Of French Identity: A Study Of The Huguenots In Colonial South Carolina, 1680-1740 Nancy Maurer University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Maurer, Nancy, "The Evolution Of French Identity: A Study Of The Huguenots In Colonial South Carolina, 1680-1740" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 847. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/847 THE EVOLUTION OF FRENCH IDENTITY: A STUDY OF THE HUGUENOTS IN COLONIAL SOUTH CAROLINA, 1680-1740 by NANCY LEA MAURER A.A. Valencia Community College B.A. University of Central Florida A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2006 ©2006 Nancy Lea Maurer ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the changes that occurred in the French identity of Huguenot immigrants to colonial Carolina. In their pursuit of prosperity and religious toleration, the Huguenots’ identity evolved from one of French religious refugees to that of white South Carolinians. How and why this evolution occurred is the focus of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Commission Searches SC Swamps for Gen. Francis Marion
    Vol. 4 No. 1_____________________________________ ________________January – March 2007 Trail Commission Searches SC Swamps for Gen. Francis Marion The oil on canvas painting, General Marion Inviting a British Officer to Share His Meal, by Eutaw Springs artist John Blake White (1781 - 1859), memorializes the “Swamp Fox” sharing his sweet potato dinner with a British officer reported by “Parson” Mason Locke Weems in his highly romanticized The Life of General Francis Marion: A Celebrated Partisan Officer, in the Revolutionary War, Against the British and Tories in South Carolina and Georgia. This painting was presented to the United States Senate in 1899. According to the artist’s son, Octavius A. White: “the figure of Marion is a portrait from memory, as my father, when a boy, knew him well. Marion’s farm adjoined the plantation of my grandfather.” If this is true, this is the closest any artistic representation of Marion is to the artist having painted a contemporaneous image of the partisan. For more information on this painting, see the catalogue write-up at http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/art/artifact/Painting_33_00002.htm. For recent “news” on Oscar Marion, see http://fusilier.wordpress.com/2006/12/17/oscar-marion-is-anonymous-no-longer. The Francis Marion Trail Commission will seek out the documentation and archaeology to sort the myth from the man and to accurately depict the story of the Revolution in the Pee Dee and Lowcountry of South Carolina on those hallowed grounds. 1 Editor / Publisher’s Notes Academicians have many academic journals in which to publish articles, but the lay writers are much more limited.
    [Show full text]
  • President Washington's Tour Through South Carolina in 1791
    Bulletins of the Historical Commission of South Carolina.-No. 12 President Washington's Tour Through South Carolina In 1791 By A. S. SALLEY Secretary of the Commission Printed for the Commission by The Stale Comuenv Columbia, S. C. 1932 In March, 1791, President Washington left Philadelphia for a tour of the Southern States. He kept a diary of his daily experiences while on the tour. This diary has been printed several times and edited by several different editors. So far as that portion of the diary which relates to South Carolina is concerned, there is need for further editing, and the editings heretofore done also need editing in order to purge them of numerous errors. In 1860 the diary was published by Charles B. Richardson & Co., of New York, and edited by Benson J. Lossing. In 1923 the Houghton Mifflin Company brought out Wash- ington's ou.thern ToUlT'1791, by Archibald Henderson. This edition of 'Washington's diary is such a beautiful example of the bookmarker's art and such a storehouse of valuable his- torical material that it is regrettable that it is marred by so much misinformation," In 1926 the Houghton Mifflin Company published The Diaries of George Washington 1748-1799, edited by John C. Fitzpatrick, A. M., in four volumes. Last year when preparations were being made for the George vVashington Bi-Centennial the writer was asked to locate upon a map of South Carolina the various points at which 'Vashing- ton halted and which he mentioned in his diary. The map was to be used in an atlas showing Washington's travels over the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Constitutional Convention of South Carolina, May 10, 1790-June 3, 1790
    JOURNAL OF THE Constitutional Convention OF South Carolina May 10, 1790-June 3, 1790 Edited by FRANCIS M. HUTSON Chief Clerk of the Historical Commission of South Carolina Printed for the Historical Commission of South Carolina By the State Commercial Printing Co. Columbia, S. C. 1946 A List of the several Members of the Convention held at Columbia in the State of South Carolina on Monday the 10th day of May 1790, for the purpose of revising, altering, or forming a Xew Constitution of this State. Vizt. Saint Philips & S* Michael, Chiton Charles Cotesworth Pinckney Elihu Hall Bay Edward Rutledge Rev'^ Richard Furman John Fauchcraud Grimke Rev*^ Dr. Henry Purcell Thomas Jones John Drayton Thomas Pinckney Samuel Stent Edward Darrel William Johnson Christ Church John Julius Pringle His ExcelP Charles Pinckney Thomas Corbett ^^rnoldus Vanderhost Francis Kinloch John Boone Christopher Gadsden William Scott junior Daniel Stevens Joshua Toomer Thomas Bee Joseph Manigault Anthony Toomer Thomas Shubrick Thomas Heyward junior Saint John, Berkley County William Moultrie Henry Laurens junior Peter Fayssoux [The lower third of the page has been torn off.] Saint George Dorchester William Webb James Kennedy Matthias Hutchinson William Fishburne Thomas Waring (pine Hill) Thomas Pinckney junior John Bell Richard Brook Roberts Elisha Hall Thomas Singleton Saint Helena William Harley Morton AVaring Benjamin Reynolds Thomas Talbird ^ Saint James, Goose Creek ^ Scratched over —— John Deas junior Robert Pringle Peter Gray George Hypp Xathaniel M'^Cants Jacob Guerard William Allen Deas Robert Barnwell James Smith James Garvey Aaron Loocock George ^losse Saint Thomas & Saint Dennis Saint James, Santee Thomas Screven Samuel Warren John Huger Jacob Bond I 'on Hopson Pinckney John Bowman Lewis Fogartie John ]Mayrant Thomas Karwon John Gaillard junior Robert Quash Thomas Horry Evan Edwards Samuel Wio-fall Prince George.
    [Show full text]