DOCSLIB.ORG

South Carolina Hall of Fame

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Carolina Hall of Fame SOUTH CAROLINA HALL OF FAME Teacher Guide John Rutledge South Carolina Social Studies Standards John Rutledge The American Revolution, Rebellion and Conflict, The Road to Revolution, The War for Independence Topics include - Stamp Act Congress, President/Governor of SC, Battle of Sullivan's Island/Fort Moultrie, Siege of Charles Town, Benjamin Lincoln, Thomas Sumter, Francis Marion, Constitutional Convention, Chief Justice of SC 3-3.1 - Summarize the causes of the American Revolution, including Britain's passage of the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and the Intolerable Acts, the rebellion of the colonist, and the writing of the Declaration of Independence. 3-3.3 - Summarize the course of the American Revolution in South Carolina, including the role of William Jasper and Fort Moultrie, the occupation of Charles Town by the British, the partisan warfare of Thomas Sumter, Andrew Pickens, and Francis Marion, and the battles of Cowpens, Kings Mountain, and Eutaw Springs. 3-3.4 - Summarize the effects of the American Revolution, including the establishment of state and national governments. 3-3.5 - Outline the structure of state government, including the branches of government (legislative, executive, and judicial), the representative bodies of each branch (general assembly, governor, and supreme court), and the basic powers of each branch. Standard 4-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the conflict between the American colonies and England. 4-3.3 - Summarize the importance of key battles of the Revolutionary War and the reasons for American victories including Lexington and Concord, Bunker (Breed's) Hill, Charleston, Saratoga, Cowpens, and Yorktown. Standard 8-2:. The student will demonstrate an understanding of the causes of the American Revolution and the beginnings of the new nation, with an emphasis on South Carolina's role in the development of that nation. 2 8-2.2 - Summarize the response of South Carolina to events leading to the American Revolution including the Stamp Act, the Tea Acts, and the Sons of Liberty. 8-2.5 - Summarize the role of South Carolinians in the course of the American Revolution, including the use of partisan warfare and the battles of Charleston, Camden, Cowpens, Kings Mountain, and Eutaw Springs. 8-2.6 - Explain the role of South Carolinians in the establishment of their new state government and the national government after the American Revolution. Standard 8-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of South Carolina's role in the development of the new national government. 8-3.2 - Explain the role of South Carolina and its leaders in the Constitutional Convention, including their support of the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Commerce Compromise as well as the division among South Carolinians over the ratification of the Constitution. 3 S.C. Hall of Fame Biography John Rutledge John Rutledge was born in Charleston, SC on September 17, 1739. His father, John Rutledge (Sr.), was a Scots Irish Immigrant and physician. His mother, Sarah, was South Carolina born but of English descent. He had six siblings, including his younger brother Edward, who would also become a statesman and signer of the Declaration of Independence. Rutledge took an early interest in the practice of law and eventually studied it formally, like many of his contemporaries, at the Middle Temple in London. Afterward he returned to Charleston and began his career as a prominent Charleston legal counsel. On May 1st, 1763 he married Elizabeth Grimke and the couple had 10 children. Rutledge first became involved in the affairs of state with his involvement in the Stamp Act Congress in which he chaired a committee whose goal was to persuade rejection of the Stamp Act. Later he and his brother Edward were sent as delegates to both the First and Second Continental Congress. In 1776, just prior to the start of the American Revolution he was elected as President of the State of South Carolina and set out to bolster the states coastal defenses against an impending British invasion. He ordered the construction of a fort on Sullivan’s Island to protect the City of Charleston’s harbor. Once the British armada amassed off the coast, the fort was not even halfway complete. Rutledge was advised by General Charles Lee of the Continental Army to abandon the endeavor for fear of heavy casualties. But Rutledge was not assuaged and wrote to the commanding Officer Col. William Moultrie, “General Lee [...] wishes you to evacuate the fort. You will not, without [an] order from me. I would sooner cut off my hand than write one.” 4 On June 28th 1776, the British indeed attacked the partially built fortress. However, the British fleets hurling cannonballs were only absorbed and often repelled back at the ships by the Palmetto Tree fortified walls. The naval assault on what would eventually be named Fort Moultrie failed and the account of the battle gave rise to the nicknaming of South Carolina as The Palmetto State as well as the imagery on the state flag. In 1778, the state legislature re-drafted its constitution which Rutledge unsuccessfully tried to veto and ultimately resigned his office as a result of its adoption. After the new constitution was revised in 1779, Rutledge was elected Governor with the British army closing in quickly on Charleston and the entire state. Unable to raise any sizeable forces to defend the city, Rutledge fled and escaped capture while Charleston fell under British control in May of 1780. By the time the Americans had forced out the British in late 1782, Rutledge’s term had expired and term limits made him ineligible to run again. Instead he was elected again to the Continental Congress, serving until 1783. In 1784 he was appointed a judgeship in the SC Court of Chancery where he would serve until 1791. 5 During this period he was chosen to represent the state at the Constitutional Convention where, along with fellow South Carolinians Charles Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and Pierce Butler, he played a significant role in the crafting of the US Constitution. John Rutledge chaired the committee that created the first draft of The Constitution and many of these original elements would be included in the final version ratified. In 1789, President George Washington nominated him to be the first associate justice of the newly formed United States Supreme Court. He was confirmed by the Senate but vacated his seat before trying any cases to become Chief Justice of the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas and Sessions. On July 6, 1792 Rutledge suffered the loss of his wife Elizabeth whom he had been devoted to for almost 30 years. In late June of 1795, Rutledge was appointed by Washington as the second Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court recently vacated by John Jay. Before the senate would be back in session to confirm his appointment, Rutledge oversaw several cases whose outcomes set important precedents that are still held today regarding federal jurisdiction and multiple citizenship. During that same time frame, he came out in opposition to the Jay Treaty with Great Britain and gave a controversial and inflammatory speech which cost him the support of the Washington Administration and Senate. When the Senate returned to session in December of 1795 they rejected his pending nomination. Upon returning to Charleston that winter, John Rutledge was mentally crippled and he attempted suicide by jumping into the Charleston Harbor. Afterward, he withdrew from public life and died on June 21st 1800 at the age of 60. He is buried in St. Michaels Episcopal Churchyard, Charleston, SC. 6 Credits South Carolina Social Studies Standard Correlations were provided by Lisa Ray The purpose of the South Carolina Hall of Fame is to recognize and honor both contemporary and past citizens who have made outstanding contributions to South Carolina's heritage and progress. Funding for Knowitall.org was provided by the S. C. General Assembly through the K-12 Technology Initiative. Visit scetv.org/education for more educational resources. 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caroliniana Columns - Fall 2016 University Libraries--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society Newsletter - South Caroliniana Library Columns Fall 2016 Caroliniana Columns - Fall 2016 University Libraries--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/columns Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation University of South Carolina, "University of South Carolina Libraries - Caroliniana Columns, Issue 40, Fall 2016". http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/columns/40/ This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society Newsletter - Columns by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University South Caroliniana Society newsletter Fall 2016 Cokie Roberts Season’s greetings from the South Caroliniana Library (Photograph courtesy of the University Creative Services) Summer Scholars Find Treasures in the South Caroliniana Library The South Caroliniana Library serves many constituents, sharing its unique collections with University students and faculty, local historians and genealogists, and a multitude of researchers from around the world both in person and via its online resources. Each summer the Library welcomes budding researchers to its Sumer Scholars program which includes visiting fellowships and professorships from several sources. This summer the researchers and their assistantships included: Jacob Clawson, Ph.D. candidate, Auburn University, Governor Thomas Gordon McLeod and First Lady Elizabeth Alford McLeod Research Fellow Kevin Collins, Professor of Language and Literature, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, William Gilmore Simms Visiting Research Professor Mandy L. Cooper, Ph.D. candidate, Duke University, Lewis P. Jones Research Fellow Lauren Haumesser, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston County South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN
    Snee l"a.rm Ncar 'liOW1t Pleasant HiiBS !l0. Se-87 Charleston County South Carolina \"~ /\ E; ~;: L ., ..... ~',.-. • i 0' . ['i.>l(>. Ii ,\ PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORIC AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • District of South Carolina Historic American Buildings Survey Prepared at Washington Office for Southeast Unit HJ..Bf No .. S::;EF~ FARi,,; Ner<.r :,~ount Pleasant, Chp<rlestC!l County I South Ca.rolina Ouic or ercctlon: c. 1750 Present co'~dition: Excellent frDJ:O construction; rectanc),lo..r plan; marble mantel, Adam de- sign .. A,lditc.onal data, One-ti:r.e horne of Colone 1 Charles Pinckney. ,'!as in Pinckney fami ly for sevent:! years • Othe~ e~~stinG !,ccords: .~ •• Cr,.arleston l:useu.T.1 Prepared by Junior Architect James L .. Burnett, Jr .. , " Approved :' Ii \,}.. J 4/! -;c. " Addendum To: SNEE FARM HABS NO. SC-87 1240 Long Point Road • Charleston Coun~y South Carolina PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA • REDUCED COPIES OF IfEASURED DRAHINGS • Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Department of the Interior • Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 ~A6S 5(. , \O-(i\ouf)v HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY j ~) - SNEE FARM • HABS NO. SC-87 Location: 1240 Long Point Road, Mt. Pleasant, Charleston County, South Carolina 4.6 miles NE of Mt. Pleasant on US Hwy 17; turn left on County Road 97 (Long Point Road); continue 0.7 mile and turn left on dirt road; house is 0.1 mile down dirt road on left. UTM: 17.609960.3634640 Present Owner: National Park Service Present Use: Vacant Significance: The Charles Pinckney Historic Site, known traditionally as "Snee Farm," is the ancestral country seat of Charles pinckney III, the American patriot and statesman.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLEGROUND of FREEDOM No State Made a Greater Contribution to the Winning of America
    A~ '562. 2 .· ~\l-2. C'op~ \ BATTLEGROUND OF FREEDOM No state made a greater contribution to the winning of America. Both Kosciusko and Count Pulaski, the Polish independence and the founding of the nation than South patriots, served with distinction in South Carolina. ·Carolina. Her sons served ably and well in the Con­ For nearly four years, South Carolina was spared the tinental Congress and many of her sons laid down their horrors of war, then Charleston fell in May, 1780, and lives on the altar of freedom so that liberty and in­ South Carolina became a conquered province. Except for dependence could be achieved. Her heroine daughters Marion, Sumter and Pickens and their gallant followers, are legends of the land. it seemed all was lost. After Camden, the tide began to Upon the soil of South Carolina more battles were turn with Musgrove's Mill, Hanging Rock, King's Moun­ fought than in any other state. Both Virginia and tain and Blackstock's. In October, Nathanael Greene, the Massachusetts have been referred to as "The Cradle of fighting Quaker from Rhode Island, was given command Liberty." South Carolina was "The Battleground of of the Continental troops in the South. Daniel Morgan, an Freedom." Men from many states and nations came to epic soldier of great courage, returned to active duty, In South Carolina and fought and died. Where they fought, 17'81, the British suffered a major defeat at Cowpens. The bled and died is sacred ground, consecrated by the blood Battles of Ninety Six, Hobkirk's Hill, and most promi­ of patriots.
    [Show full text]
  • Catawba Indians in the Revolutionary War About the Time the Declaration
    Catawba Indians in the Revolutionary War About the time the Declaration of Independence was signed (July 4, 1776), British warships were planning to take the city of Charleston by setting up a base on nearby Sullivan’s Island. Gen. William Moultrie of the Continental Line got wind of the British plans and, in spite of orders to the contrary, made the decision to resist the occupation. Under Moultrie’s command was the Third South Carolina Regiment which included a group of militia men known as the “backcountry rangers.” The backcountry rangers included Catawba Indians who had not only fought against the Cherokees, their traditional enemy, but had switched from support of the Crown to the colonial cause as early as 1772. In that year the British royal government men who ruled South Carolina had changed from paying Catawbas to track runaway slaves and other chores given as favors in years past. After Moultrie’ s men won the battle of Sullivan’s Island, the backcountry rangers headed back to the northwest where the Cherokees, who remained loyal to the British, were raiding the white settlements. Catawba warriors went along with the rangers headed by Col. Andrew Williamson. This group was soon joined by Col. Thomas Sumter who would four years later make the Catawba Indian Land his base of operations. The Catawbas (also spelled Catoppas in some of the literature) proved to be valuable in the Cherokee campaign as scouts. Maurice Moore wrote that Andrew Williamson, who had been promoted to General. valued highly his advance guard of 25 Catawbas. Charleston fell to the British in May 1780.
    [Show full text]
  • A TUB to the WHALE": the FOUNDING FATHERS and ADOPTION of the FEDERAL BILL of RIGHTS Kenneth R
    "A TUB TO THE WHALE": THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL BILL OF RIGHTS Kenneth R. Bowling Seamen have a custom, when they meet a whale, to fling him out an empty tub by way of amusement, to divert him from laying violent hands upon the ship. Jonathan Swift, Tale of a Tub (1704) Like a barrel thrown to the whale, the people were to be amused with fancied amendments, until the harpoon of power, should secure its prey and render resistance ineffectual. [Samuel Bryan], ''Centinel NO. 19, ' ' (Philadel- phia) Independent Gazetteer, October 7, 1788 The constitutional role of the federal Bill of Rights has been monu- mental. This fact would surprise most members of the First Federal Congress, the body which reluctantly proposed to the states the con- stitutional amendments later called the Bill of Rights.' The Federalist Mr. Bowling is a member of the First Federal Congress Project at George Wash- ington University, Washington, D.C. This article is based upon a chapter in his "Politics in the First Congress, 1789-1791" (Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1968). Additional research was conducted under a grant from the National Endow- ment for the Humanities. ' Although much has been written about the Bill of Rights, very little of it re- lates to the legislative history of its adoption. This is particularly true about the polit- ical aspects, most of which are contained in previously unstudied manuscripts. Robert A. Rutland, The Birth of the Bill of Rights, 1776-1791 (Chapel Hill 1955), which focuses on the background of the amendments, aptly summarizes its passage through the First Federal Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    CONSTITUTIONFACTS.COM The U.S Constitution & Amendments: About the Signers (Continued) The Signers of the U.S. Constitution On September 17, 1787, the Constitutional Convention came to a close in the Assembly Room of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. There were seventy individuals chosen to attend the meetings with the initial purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation. Rhode Island opted to not send any delegates. Fifty-five men attended most of the meetings, there were never more than forty-six present at any one time, and ultimately only thirty-nine delegates actually signed the Constitution. (William Jackson, who was the secretary of the convention, but not a delegate, also signed the Constitution. John Delaware was absent but had another delegate sign for him.) While offering incredible contributions, George Mason of Virginia, Edmund Randolph of Virginia, and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts refused to sign the final document because of basic philosophical differences. Mainly, they were fearful of an all-powerful government and wanted a bill of rights added to protect the rights of the people. The following is a list of those individuals who signed the Constitution along with a brief bit of information concerning what happened to each person after 1787. Many of those who signed the Constitution went on to serve more years in public service under the new form of government. The states are listed in alphabetical order followed by each state’s signers. Connecticut William S. Johnson (1727-1819)—He became the president of Columbia College (formerly known as King’s College), and was then appointed as a United States Senator in 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 President's Report
    South Carolina Association of Counties 46th Annual Conference • August 4-7, 2013 2013 PresidentPresident’s Charles T. Edens Report SCAC 2012-2013 Officers President Charles T. Edens Sumter County Council First Vice President Second Vice President Joe Branham James R. Frazier Chester County Horry County Council Vice Chariman Council Past President Secretary Treasurer Joseph B. Dill William T. Noonan Belinda D. Copeland Greenville County Sumter County Darlington County Council Special Projects Director Treasurer South Carolina Association of Counties Charles T. Edens, President Sumter County Michael B. Cone Executive Director A Letter from the President Dear County Officials, The President’s Report is a reflection of the many programs and efforts of the South Carolina Association of Counties (SCAC) over the past year. As you know, it has been a very active and productive year. This is attributable to each one of you and the role you play in keeping this Association responsive to the ever-changing needs of county government. We hope you will take the time to read through this report to learn more about the Association’s many service programs and how they can assist your county. SCAC is one of the premier county associations in the country. We are fortunate to have strong leadership in our Board of Directors and a staff that is knowledgeable, capable, and responsive to your requests for assistance. I encourage each of you to continue to be actively involved in your Association. We face enormous challenges in the years ahead and we need to be vigilant to protect Home Rule. Specifically, we must work together to fight the private, out-of-state waste management companies in their push for the solid waste flow control bill, which would negatively impact all of our counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Begin Exercise at Byrnes Monument Found at Corner of Gervais & Sumter
    BEGIN EXERCISE AT BYRNES MONUMENT FOUND AT CORNER OF GERVAIS & SUMTER STREETS, THEN MOVE SOUTH 1. The citizens of South Carolina elected James F. Byrnes to which three offices? –––––––––––––––––––––– , –––––––––––––––––––––––– , ––––––––––––––––––––––––– What three federal offices was he appointed to? ––––––––––––––––––––––– , –––––––––––––––––––––––– , ––––––––––––––––––––––––– What was the title of Byrnes’ autobiography? ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 2. What three native South Carolinians served as generals in the American Revolution? –––––––––––––––––––––– , –––––––––––––––––––––––– , ––––––––––––––––––––––––– 3. In what war did Wade Hampton serve as a general? –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Fill in the names of the following three battles that Wade Hampton took part in: Cold –––––––––––––––––––––, –––––––––––––––burg, First –––––––––––––––––––––– After the war, Wade Hampton was elected to what two political offices? –––––––––––––––––––––– and ––––––––––––––––––––––– 4. What war did Richard Richardson serve in as a general of militia? ––––––––––––––––––––––––– Richardson Street in Columbia is now known by what name? ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 5. Strom Thurmond served in what political office longer than any other person in American history except two? ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– What was unusual about the way in which he was elected to this office?–––––––––––––––––––––– What WWII battle did Thurmond take part in? –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– What other statewide office did Thurmond
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina's Partisan
    SOWING THE SEEDS OF DISUNION: SOUTH CAROLINA’S PARTISAN NEWSPAPERS AND THE NULLIFICATION CRISIS, 1828-1833 by ERIKA JEAN PRIBANIC-SMITH A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication and Information Sciences in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2010 Copyright Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Ultimately the first state to secede on the eve of the Civil War, South Carolina erupted in controversy following the 1828 passage of an act increasing duties on foreign imports for the protection of domestic industry. Most could agree that the tariff was unconstitutional, unequal in that it benefited the industrial North more than the agrarian South, and oppressive to plantation states that had to rely on expensive northern goods or foreign imports made more costly by the duties. Factions formed, however, based on recommended means of redress. Partisan newspapers of that era became vocal supporters of one faction or the other. What became the Free Trade Party by the end of the Nullification Crisis began as a loosely-organized group that called for unqualified resistance to what they perceived as a gross usurpation of power by the federal government. The Union Party grew out of a segment of the population that was loyal to the government and alarmed by their opposition’s disunion rhetoric. Strong at the start due to tariff panic and bolstered by John C. Calhoun’s “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” the Free Trade Party lost ground when the Unionists successfully turned their overzealous disunion language against them in the 1830 city and state elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in the Constitution: the Ri Onic Shifts in Tension Over Three Pivotal Clauses Joseph Privitera Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2012 Slavery in the Constitution: The rI onic Shifts in Tension Over Three Pivotal Clauses Joseph Privitera Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Inequality and Stratification Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Privitera, Joseph, "Slavery in the Constitution: The rI onic Shifts in eT nsion Over Three Pivotal Clauses" (2012). Honors Theses. 885. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/885 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Slavery in the Constitution: The Ironic Shifts in Tension Over Three Pivotal Clauses By Joseph F. Privitera ********** Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History UNION COLLEGE June, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter I – Three-Fifths Clause 16 Chapter II – Slave Trade Clause 34 Chapter II – Fugitive Slave Clause 51 Conclusion 62 Bibliography 65 2 Introduction In 1842 the United States Supreme Court came to an 8-1 decision in a case that was highly controversial on a national scale. While Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) directly involved only the fate of one family, it held major significance for all the inhabitants of the nation, whether enslaved or free. When Justice Joseph Story delivered the Opinion of the Court that the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was constitutional and no state could pass any law expanding upon or interfering with the regulations contained therein, it became quite clear that slaveholders had gained a major victory over those opposed to the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2008 Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866 Walter Bright Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bright, Walter, "Radicalism and Rebellion: Presidential Reconstruction in South Carolina April 1865 to May 1866" (2008). All Theses. 363. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/363 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RADICALSIM AND REBELLION: PRESIDENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA APRIL 1865 TO MAY 1866 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History by Walter Steven Bright May 2008 Accepted by: Dr. Rod Andrew Jr., Committee Chair Dr. H. Roger Grant Dr. Abel A. Bartley ABSTRACT The focus of this thesis deals primarily with the white elite of South Carolina during Presidential Reconstruction. Historians have noted South Carolina radicalism before the Civil War, but I propose that this radicalism did not simply fade away when the war ended. I argue that the Civil War did not destroy white South Carolinians’ will to fight; a sense of nationalism still flourished as they continued to rebel against the federal government, despite the devastating effects of the war on the Palmetto State. This work will show that these white elites continued this fight because they were enraged over the total devastation left in the wake of Sherman’s march through the state and the failure of the federal government to institute an acceptable Reconstruction plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Versions of the Preamble to the Constitution, 1787
    1 Two versions of the Preamble to the Constitution, 1787 Introduction On May 25, 1787, the fifty-five delegates to the Constitutional Convention began meeting in a room, no bigger than a large schoolroom, in Philadelphia’s State House. They posted sentries at the doors and windows to keep their “secrets from flying out.” They barred the press and public, and took a vow not to reveal to anyone the words spoken there. There were speeches of two, three, and four hours. The convention, which lasted four months, took only a single eleven-day break. First draft of the United States Constitution, with notes by Pierce Butler, August 6, 1787 This copy of the draft of the Constitution was printed secretly for the delegates in August 1787. In order to make it easier for them to take notes it was printed with wide margins. Delegate Pierce Butler, one of the wealthiest slaveholders from South Carolina, owned and marked up this copy. First printing of the official United States Constitution, for members of the Constitutional Convention, inscribed by Benjamin Franklin to Jonathan Williams, September 17, 1787 The first official printed version of the Constitution was distributed to the delegates, among whom Benjamin Franklin, aged 81, was the senior member. The preamble of the working draft and the final version differ significantly. In the August 6 preamble, delegates described themselves as representatives of “the States of New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode-Island,” etc. The final version, beginning “We the People of the United States,” shows that in the six weeks between the writing of the draft and of the final version, the idea of a united nation had been born.
    [Show full text]