DOCSLIB.ORG

Conversational Implicatures in Hillary Clinton's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conversational Implicatures in Hillary Clinton's CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES IN HILLARY CLINTON’S INTERVIEW WITH NDTV AND REFINERY29 IN 2017 A Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty In Partial of the Requirements for the Degree Strata One ARY CHYNTHIA YASNI NIM. 11140260000063 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2018 ABSTRACT Ary Chynthia Yasni, Conversational Implicatures in Hillary Clinton‟s Interview with NDTV and Refinery29 in 2017. Thesis: English Letters Department, Letters and Humanity Faculty, State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2018. This research discusses about the conversational implicature that is generated by non-observance of maxims in the transcript text of Hillary Clinton‟s interviews with the representative of NDTV and Refinery29 by using Paul Grice‟s Cooperative Principles theory. It is also aimed to find out the meaning of each conversational implicature that have been found in the transcript text of the interviews. The result shows that both particularized conversational implicature and generalized conversational implicature are found in the transcript text. Clinton has done the non-observance towards three out of four maxims in the Cooperative Principles; they are maxim of quantity, maxim of relevance, and maxim of manner. Furthermore, the types of non-observance of maxims that found in the transcript text of the interviews are flouting and opting out. Moreover, most of the conversational implicatures rise because Clinton fails to observe the maxim by flouting maxim of quantity. This research concludes that Clinton wanted the interlocutors to understand what she really meant by giving more information than what was required which made her to flout the maxim of quantity the most. She needed to be clear in answering the questions since she often got critics because as a woman and public figure, she was aware that so many people were paying attention to whatever she was doing. Keywords: Conversational Implicature, Maxims, Non-Observance of the Maxim i APPROVAL SHEET ii LEGALIZATION iii DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extend has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. Tangerang Selatan, July 17th 2018 Ary Chynthia Yasni iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful All praises be to Allah, the lord of the world who has bestowed upon the writer in completing this thesis, without His blessings and His mercy, it is impossible that this thesis can be completed. Peace and salutation be upon the prophet, Muhammad SAW, his family, companions, and adherents who had guided us to be a good and successful person in this world. On this occasion, the writer would deeply thank her beloved parents, Yasni Darwis and Sasmita, for giving her support and prayer this whole time, and her sisters, Yuherly, Mery, Novri, and Rina for giving her constant support and motivation to accomplish this thesis. The writer also would like to express her gratitude to the people who have contributed morally, scientifically, and spiritually to finish this thesis. She would like to express her appreciations to the following people, namely: 1. Prof. Dr. Sukron Kamil, M. Ag. as the Dean of Letters and Humanities Faculty. 2. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd. as the Head of English Letters Department. 3. Elve Oktafiyani, M. Hum. as the secretary of English Letters Department. 4. Hilmi Akmal, M. Hum. as the writer‟s advisor who has spent his time to give inspirations, encouragements, critiques, and sincere guidance for the writer in finishing the thesis. v 5. All the lecturers in English Letters Department who sincerely taught and educated the writer valuable knowledge during her study at State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 6. All the librarians of Adab and Humanities Faculty State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. 7. Tartila Aryani, Annisa Elfiana, and Ray Sita for helping the writer by giving her inspirations, motivations, and suggestions to complete this thesis. 8. The Glasses Gang, Lulu Azizah, Alyssa Ibrati, and Irvin Vizan Muhammad who constantly bring laughters to the writer‟s life. 9. The ExoticA, the writer‟s beloved classmates, Nadilah Febryana, Galuh Nastiti, Nafilah Gustiyani, Sandra Gita, Anggia Ayu, Virza Af‟idati, Arcciasa Junanda, Angelina Dewi, Fara Kurnia, Shabrina Farahiyah. 10. The writer‟s classmates in Linguistics class. 11. KKN AVATAR 149, especially Tsizy Aqila, Shinta Dara, Mutiara Sari, Venny Adelia and Intan Rachmasari. 12. Yeh ling for giving the writer endless support and motivations. 13. EXO for giving the writer strength even from afar. Tangerang Selatan, July 17th 2018 Ary Chynthia Yasni vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………….. i APPROVAL SHEET ………………………………………………………………….. ii LEGALIZATION ……………………………………………………………………. iii DECLARATION ……………………………………………………………………… iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT …………………………………………………………….. v TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………….. vii CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 A. Background of the Study......................................................................................... 1 B. Focus of the Study .................................................................................................. 4 C. Research Question .................................................................................................. 4 D. Significance of the Study ........................................................................................ 5 E. Research Methodology ........................................................................................... 5 1. The Objectives of the Research .......................................................................... 5 2. The Method of the Research ............................................................................... 6 3. The Instrument of the Research .......................................................................... 6 4. Unit Analysis ...................................................................................................... 6 5. Technique of Data Collection and Data Analysis ............................................... 7 CHAPTER II – LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................. 9 A. Previous Research ................................................................................................... 9 B. Discourse Analysis ................................................................................................ 11 C. Cooperative Principles .......................................................................................... 12 1. Maxim of Quantity ............................................................................................ 13 2. Maxim of Quality .............................................................................................. 13 vii 3. Maxim of Relevance ......................................................................................... 13 4. Maxim of Manner ............................................................................................. 14 D. The Non-observance Maxim ................................................................................. 14 1. Flouting a Maxim .............................................................................................. 14 2. Violating a Maxim ............................................................................................ 15 3. Infringing a Maxim ........................................................................................... 16 4. Opting out a Maxim .......................................................................................... 17 5. Suspending a Maxim ......................................................................................... 17 E. Implicature ............................................................................................................ 18 1. Conventional Implicature .................................................................................. 19 2. Conversational Implicature ............................................................................... 20 CHAPTER III – FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ................................................. 23 A. Data Description ................................................................................................... 23 B. Data Analysis ........................................................................................................ 23 CHAPTER IV – CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS .................................... 51 A. Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 51 B. Suggestions ........................................................................................................... 52 WORKS CITED .................................................................................................... 53 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................ 56 viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study People communicate with each other using a system of communication which is called a code.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January 10, 2018 Mr. Al Bocchicchio, Director in Speaking for The
    Home of Home 28073 Avenue, Grover, NC Cleveland of 301 theThe Inn Patriots™ The Museum® Presidential Culinary January 10, 2018 Mr. Al Bocchicchio, Director In speaking for the Under Secretary for Benefits Department of Veterans Affairs Atlanta Regional Office 1700 Clairmont Road Decatur, Georgia 30033 , IAHHRM MEMORANDUM: How the VA home loan code and Lenders Handbook 26-7 inadvertently, and is possibly mistakenly, blocking, inhibiting and preventing veteran success stories thus, perhaps contributing to ™ substantial rates of veteran suicides and The Presidential Service Center The Presidential Dear Al, www.theinnofthepatriots.com It has taken this disabled and injured veteran a while to answer your letter. I have been doing more research on the VA home loan code. (Perl, 2017) I understand your quoting of the VA Home Loan Lenders regulations to the Presidential Inquiry launched by then President Obama. That White House then, like this White House now, and others keep asking the same questions about the VA. What, and who is stopping veterans from becoming a success in the changing economy of 2018? ® BACKGROUNDER, WHO, WHERE, WHAT, WHEN: In 2008 my veteran disabled wife and myself (also a disabled vet, 30-year retired) opened a B&B in Grover, NC under a lease. We live in the home with our seven-year-old daughter. In 2012 we bought the house, but we were denied use of our VA loan six times, by six different banks. We have been unable ever to use our VA loan guarantee program and benefit as vets. I was once a homeless veteran living in a cargo van and closet after returning from OIF and OEF.
    [Show full text]
  • Studenti II Godine O Međunarodnoj Zajednici Biografije Poznatih
    Pravni fakultet Osijek Međunarodno pravo Studenti II godine o međunarodnoj zajednici Biografije poznatih aktivista, političara, državnika i povijesnih osoba Tekstove uredili: Mira Lulić i Davor Muhvić Osijek, 2020. SADRŽAJ Riječ-dvije o ovoj zbirci studentskih tekstova ................................................................................ 4 I. Aktivisti i promotori ljudskih prava ........................................................................................ 5 1. AMAL ALAMUDDIN CLOONEY (Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo) ...................................................... 5 2. Dr. SHIRIN EBADI (Iran) ...................................................................................................... 7 3. BILL GATES (Sjedinjene Američke Države) .......................................................................... 9 4. CHEN GUANGCHENG (Kina) ............................................................................................. 12 5. HARRY, VOJVODA OD SUSSEXA (Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo) .................................................. 14 6. ANGELINA JOLIE (Sjedinjene Američke Države) ................................................................. 16 7. AUNG SAN SUU KYI (Mianmar) ........................................................................................ 18 8. GRETA THUNBERG (Švedska) ........................................................................................... 21 9. WILLIAM, VOJVODA OD CAMBRIDGEA (Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo) ....................................... 23 10. OPRAH WINFREY (Sjedinjene
    [Show full text]
  • Onward Together Has Done Little Besides Fundr | the Daily Caller
    POLITICS Hillary and Bill Clinton (Getty images) ∧∧ Hillary’s New Political Group Has∧ Little To Show Except Soliciting Donations In First Four Months PETER HASSON Associate Editor 11:01 PM 09/17/2017 In the four months since Hillary Clinton officially launched her new political group, Onward Together, the group has done little besides soliciting donations from Clinton supporters. When Clinton went public with her group on May 15 she said the group would be partnering with five left-wing political groups: Indivisible, Swing Left, Color of Change, Emerge America and Run for Something. But four months later, it’s unclear what the group’s donors have to show for their money. Onward Together’s website still has just two tabs: one explaining the group’s mission and one asking supporters for donations. An email signed by Clinton asking supporters for money last week excused her group’s lack of action. “You may not have heard much about the work we’re doing at Onward Together,” Clinton wrote. “That’s because we’re working behind the scene to fund, support, and amplify the work of the groups we’re supporting. We’re not the story: they are.” She closed the email by asking supporters to commit to a recurring monthly donation. The Daily Caller reached out to all five political groups, asking them to confirm that Onward Together has, in fact, been funding and supporting their groups. Only one group responded to the TheDC’s repeated requests: Indivisible, the Soros-backed “resistance” group. “Onward Together has not given any financial support to us,” Helen Kalla, an Indivisible spokesperson, wrote in an email.
    [Show full text]
  • The Daily 202
    From: The Washington Post To: (b) (6) Subject: rte’s victory after assaulting reporter reflects rising tribalism in American politics Date: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:39:49 AM If you're having trouble reading this, click here. The Daily 202 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Gianforte’s victory after assaulting reporter reflects epic.org EPIC-17-03-31-DHS-FOIA-20180515-Production-2 000001 rising tribalism in American politics Greg Gianforte apologizes for assaulting reporter dUring acceptance speech ~ BY JAMES HOHMANN ~ with Breanne Deppisch THE BIG IDEA: Greg Gianforte admitted to attacking a reporter and apologized during his victory speech last night, as he kept Montana's sole House seat in Republican hands. Now he and his party's leaders are trying to move on. On the eve of the special election, the wealthy technology epic.org EPIC-17-03-31-DHS-FOIA-20180515-Production-2 000002 entrepreneur flipped out when the Guardian’s Ben Jacobs asked him about the CBO’s score of the health care bill. He now faces misdemeanor assault charges for reportedly throwing Jacobs to the ground and breaking his glasses. “I made a mistake,” the congressman-elect said at his party in Bozeman. “Not in our minds!” yelled a supporter. David Weigel, who was there, reports that some in the crowd laughed. -- After his comfortable six-point victory, Republican congressional leaders are making clear there will be no meaningful consequences for his behavior. “Elections are about choices and Montanans made their choice,” Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement this morning. "Rep.-elect Gianforte is an outsider with real-world experience creating jobs in Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • October-2017.Pdf
    Inside stories of how activist staffers countered corporate lobbies “A wonderful read.” — ROBERT REICH “ Witty and penetrating…” — NORMAN ORNSTEIN “ This book is the story of a public servant … and his fellow activist staffers, whose valiant work on consumer protection has helped millions of Americans.” — RALPH NADER “A lively and thought- provoking book…” — JAMES A. THURBER “ This may be the most important political book written about our current political dysfunction…” — MATT MYERS Available now in jacketed cloth & ebook formats. Visit us at www.vanderbiltuniversitypress.com. contents OCTOBER 2017 UP FRONT 6 The New Fight for Labor Rights 18 To survive, the labor movement needs to rethink its strategy. BY RACHEL M. COHEN 8 Losing Hearts and Minds How Trump quietly gutted a program to combat extremism. BY BENJAMIN POWERS 9 The Trump Tweetometer A look inside the president’s mind, based on his first seven months of tweets. 10 The Next Standing Rock Why is Canada green-lighting a pipeline that could kill the climate? BY BEN ADLER 12 Art of the Steal How Trump’s self-dealing helped make his book a best-seller. BY ALEX SHEPHARD COLUMNS 14 Deadbeat Democrats How Bill Clinton set the stage for the GOP’s war on the poor. BY BRYCE COVERT Lauren Underwood, 16 a nurse from Illinois, Redoing the Electoral Math is a candidate for Congress. It will take more than demographics to save the Democrats. BY JOHN B. JUDIS Running on Hope REVIEW 46 Rules for Radicals A new group of Obama aides aims to take down Trump. The right-wing economist who rigged But can Democrats win without a unified message? democracy for the rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement Program 2021
    Sapientia et Doctrina Wisdom and Learning “Wisdom and learning shall be the stability of thy times.” —Adapted from Isaiah 33:6 The Fordham University Seal The Great Seal of Fordham University proclaims that Fordham has been a Jesuit university since its founder, Archbishop John Hughes, entrusted it to the care of the Society of Jesus five years after its founding in 1841. Hence, the coat of arms of the Society of Jesus stands at the center of the Great Seal of the University. The coat of arms bears the Greek letters for the name Jesus—IHS—with the cross resting in the horizontal line of the letter H, and the three nails beneath in a field framed in maroon, the color of the University, with fleurs-de-lis on the edge of the maroon frame. Around the Society’s coat of arms is a scroll with the University’s motto, Sapientia et Doctrina (Wisdom and Learning). The scroll rests on a field in which tongues of fire are displayed, recalling the outpouring of the gifts of the Holy Spirit of wisdom (sapientia) that marked the first Pentecost. A laurel wreath at the center of which are listed the names of the disciplines that are or have been taught at the University rests at the top of the seal. (The University had a medical school from 1905 to 1919 and a College of Pharmacy from 1912 to 1971.) These central heraldic devices are enclosed within a circular field fashioned as a belt and edged with beads. The field bears the University’s name (rendered in Latin) and the date of its foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Digital Policy Incubator “Digital Technology and Democracy”
    Launch of the Global Digital Policy Incubator “Digital Technology and Democracy” A summary of the Lessons Learned and Challenges ahead Stanford University, October 6, 2017 CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE RULE OF LAW | FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATINAL STUDIES 0 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 PANEL 1: WHEN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONFLICTS WITH DEMOCRACY 5 PANEL 2: WHEN INFORMATION BECOMES THE WEAPON 9 PANEL 3: DIGITAL PLATFORMS & DEMOCRATIC RESPONSIBILITY 12 KEYNOTE: DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, DIPLOMACY, AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES 15 ANNEX 21 SPEAKER REFLECTIONS 21 TRANSCRIPT OF TIMOTHY GARTON ASH’S TEN POINTS TO FRAME CHALLENGES TO THE QUALITY OF DISCOURSE IN THE DIGITAL AGE 39 TRANSCRIPT OF KEYNOTE WITH SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON 43 1 Introduction Global Digital Policy Incubator - Public Launch Event: Democracy & Digital Technology The Global Digital Policy Incubator (GDPi) at Stanford University’s Center for Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, is a global, multi-stakeholder collaboration hub for development of norms and policies for our global, digital ecosystem. We bring together thought leaders and policy- makers to address conceptual and practical governance challenges that flow from digital technology, particularly when they bear on democracy and human rights. Our mission is to help the private sector, civil society and governments work together to craft effective policies that allow society to capitalize on the upside benefits of technology, while protecting against the downside risks. On October 6, 2017, GDPi held our public launch event under the rubric of Democracy & Digital Technology, where we focused on urgent governance challenges in the global digital Information ecosystem. Our program started with an acknowledgment that we are at a pivotal moment for the future of democratic governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging a New Democratic Party: the Politics of the Third Way from Clinton to Obama Curtis Atkins a Dissertation Submitted to T
    FORGING A NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY: THE POLITICS OF THE THIRD WAY FROM CLINTON TO OBAMA CURTIS ATKINS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO May 2015 © Curtis Atkins 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the evolution of the American Democratic Party’s ideological orientation from 1985 to 2014. The central problem is to develop an understanding of how shifts in political-economic context and factional agency combine to produce alterations in the predominant ideology of a U.S. political party. The primary question posed is how the centrist perspective known as the ‘third way’ replaced the left-liberalism of the New Deal and Great Society eras as the guiding public philosophy of the Democratic Party. Whereas many scholars propose that the modern third way revisionism of center-left parties is explained primarily as electoral opportunism or as an adoption of the political logic of the New Right, this study focuses on how changes in political economy (particularly the transition from Keynesianism to neoliberalism) prompted the elaboration of an alternative ideological framework that sought to adapt to new times. In the U.S. case, the primary agent of this process of ideological reorientation was the New Democrat faction, most well-known for its connection to President Bill Clinton. Combining qualitative document analysis and focused interviews with personnel from the think-tanks and policy institutes of the New Democrat faction and its competitors, the dissertation finds that the initiation and maintenance of reorientation is dependent on a faction’s success in elaborating and continually ‘decontesting’ an alternative framework that de-legitimatizes a party’s pre-existing ideological commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Commissive Utterance in Hillary Clinton’S Speech
    AN ANALYSIS OF COMMISSIVE UTTERANCE IN HILLARY CLINTON’S SPEECH SKRIPSI Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan (S.Pd) Study Program of English Department By NADYA ZIRA NATASA NPM. 1402050159 FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2018 ABSTRACT Nadya Zira Natasa. 1402050159. An Analysis Of Commissive Utterance In Hillary Clinton’s speech. Skripsi. English Education Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Muhammadiyah Sumatra Utara, Medan 2018. This study deals with the use of commissive utterance in Hillary Clinton’s speech. The objectives of the study were to find out the types of commissive utterance, to explain the use of commissive utterance and to investigate the function of commissive utterance in Hillary Clinton’s speech. The source of the data was Hillary Clinton’s speech and the transcribe. This study applied descriptive qualitative method. The data were classified into types of commissive utterance. They were analyzed based on the types of commissive utterance. The study found that there are four types of commissive utterance, namely: promises, pledges, threats and vows. There are 62 commissive utterance in 262 speeches. The findings of this study showed that of 9 promises, 19 pledges, 14 threats and 20 vows. The most dominant was vows because the speaker in this speech mostly gave the promise to do something in future action. It means that, she really want to promise with USA’s citizens so that USA’s citizens choosed her in political campaigns because she had made a big promise and she assumed his promise was really better than other speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis on Hillary Clinton's
    A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON HILLARY CLINTON’S CAMPAIGN SPEECH A THESIS BY MERLIN DAMANIK REG.NO.140705011 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATRA UTARA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Accepted by the Board of Examiners in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Sarjana Sastra from the Department of English, Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara, Medan. The examination is held in Department of English Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatera Utara on Wednesday, December 19th, 2018 Dean of Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Sumatra Utara Dr. Budi Agustono, M.S. NIP. 19600805 198703 1 001 Board of Examiners Prof. T.Silvana Sinar, M.A., Ph.D. ___________________________ Dr. Deliana, M. Hum. ____________________________ Dr. Masdiana Lubis, M.Hum. _____________________________ UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I, MERLIN DAMANIK, DECLARE THAT I AM THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS THESIS EXCEPT WHERE REFERENCE IS MADE IN THE TEXT OF THIS THESIS. THIS THESIS CONTAINS NO MATERIAL PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE OR EXTRACTED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM A THESIS BY WHICH I HAVE QUALIFIED FOR OR AWARDED ANOTHER DEGREE. NO OTHER PERSON’S WORK HAS BEEN USED WITHOUT DUE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN THE MAIN TEXT OF THIS THESIS. THIS THESIS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF ANOTHER DEGREE IN ANY TERTIARY EDUCATION. Signed : Date : December 19th, 2018 v UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA COPYRIGHT DECLARATION NAME : MERLIN DAMANIK TITLLE OF THESIS : A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON HILLARY CLINTON’S CAMPAIGN SPEECH QUALIFICATION : S-1/ SARJANA SASTRA DEPARTMENT : ENGLISH I AM WILLING THAT MY THESIS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTION AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LIBRARIAN OF DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, FACULTY OF CULTURAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT USERS ARE MADE AWARE OF THEIR OBLIGATION UNDER THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Law: 114Th Diploma Ceremony
    23 MAY 2021 | 10:30 A.M. The Trustees and the President of Fordham University and the Dean and the Faculty of Fordham University School of Law welcome and congratulate the families and friends of the graduates of the following classes: J.D. SEPTEMBER 2020 J.D. FEBRUARY 2021 J.D. MAY 2021 M.S.L. FEBRUARY 2021 M.S.L. MAY 2021 M.S.L. SEPTEMBER 2021 LL.M. SEPTEMBER 2020 LL.M. FEBRUARY 2021 LL.M. MAY 2021 S.J.D. MAY 2021 S.J.D. SEPTEMBER 2021 1 TEACHER OF THE YEAR AWARD Clare Huntington Joseph M. McLaughlin Professor of Law Clare Huntington is the Joseph M. McLaughlin Professor of Law. She is an expert in the fields of family law and poverty law, publishing widely in both areas, including a monograph, Failure to Flourish: How Law Undermines Family Relationships, published by Oxford University Press. Huntington serves as an associate reporter for the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Children and the Law. Her legal experience includes serving as an attorney advisor in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel as well as clerking for Justice Harry A. Blackmun and Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States, Judge Merrick B. Garland of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and Judge Denise Cote of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York. She earned her J.D. from Columbia Law School and her B.A. from Oberlin College. 2 ADJUNCT TEACHER OF THE YEAR AWARD Jordana Alter Confino Adjunct Professor of Law; Director of Professionalism and Special Projects Jordana Alter Confino is an adjunct professor of law and the director of professionalism and special projects, overseeing the house system and Fordham Law’s professionalism and wellness curricula.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2009 Nineteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Nineteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2009). International Seapower Symposium. 4. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/4 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 6–9 October 2009 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History Naval War College and John W. Kennedy U.S. NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT,RHODE ISLAND 2010 Editor’s Note The editor has made every attempt to establish a clear and accurate record of the symposium proceedings, one that faithfully records the opinions and views of the participants. In establishing the printed text from speaking notes, transcripts, sem- inar notes, and tape recordings of speakers or of the official English-language simultaneous translators, the editor has silently corrected slips of grammar, spell- ing, and wording. He has inserted full names and ranks when omitted by the speaker, and occasionally a word or phrase in square brackets to clarify the text.
    [Show full text]