South Australian Aboriginal Housing Strategy 2021-2031
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lake Victoria Annual Report 2008-09 Murray–Darling Basin Authority Lake Victoria Annual Report 2008-09
MURRAY-DARLING BASIN AUTHORITY Lake Victoria Annual Report 2008-09 Murray–Darling Basin Authority Lake Victoria Annual Report 2008-09 Published by Murray-Darling Basin Authority Postal Address GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location Level 4, 51 Allara Street, Canberra City Australian Capital Territory Telephone (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 E-Mail [email protected] Internet http://www.mdba.gov.au For further information contact the Murray-Darling Basin Authority office on (02) 6279 0100 This report may be cited as: Lake Victoria Annual Report 2008-09. MDBA Publication No. 50/09 ISBN: 978-1-921557-56-9 (on-line) ISBN: 978-1-921557-57-6 (print) © Copyright Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA), on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia 2009. This work is copyright. With the exception of photographs, any logo or emblem, and any trademarks, the work may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or in part, provided that it is not sold or used in any way for commercial benefit, and that the source and author of any material used is acknowledged. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 or above, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The views, opinions and conclusions expressed by the authors in this publication are not necessarily those of MDBA or the Commonwealth. -
Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family
INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWELDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND “BEST PRACTICE„ DESIGN ....................................................10 The Design of Early Learning, Child-care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ..................................................................................................................................10 Conceptions of Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ..................................12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool ............................................................................................. -
Aboriginal Agency, Institutionalisation and Survival
2q' t '9à ABORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND PEGGY BROCK B. A. (Hons) Universit¡r of Adelaide Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History/Geography, University of Adelaide March f99f ll TAT}LE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TAE}LES AND MAPS iii SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABBREVIATIONS ix C}IAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION I CFIAPTER TWO. TI{E HISTORICAL CONTEXT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 32 CHAPTER THREE. POONINDIE: HOME AWAY FROM COUNTRY 46 POONINDIE: AN trSTä,TILISHED COMMUNITY AND ITS DESTRUCTION 83 KOONIBBA: REFUGE FOR TI{E PEOPLE OF THE VI/EST COAST r22 CFIAPTER SIX. KOONIBBA: INSTITUTIONAL UPHtrAVAL AND ADJUSTMENT t70 C}IAPTER SEVEN. DISPERSAL OF KOONIBBA PEOPLE AND THE END OF TI{E MISSION ERA T98 CTIAPTER EIGHT. SURVTVAL WITHOUT INSTITUTIONALISATION236 C}IAPTER NINtr. NEPABUNNA: THtr MISSION FACTOR 268 CFIAPTER TEN. AE}ORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND SURVTVAL 299 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 320 ltt TABLES AND MAPS Table I L7 Table 2 128 Poonindie location map opposite 54 Poonindie land tenure map f 876 opposite 114 Poonindie land tenure map f 896 opposite r14 Koonibba location map opposite L27 Location of Adnyamathanha campsites in relation to pastoral station homesteads opposite 252 Map of North Flinders Ranges I93O opposite 269 lv SUMMARY The institutionalisation of Aborigines on missions and government stations has dominated Aboriginal-non-Aboriginal relations. Institutionalisation of Aborigines, under the guise of assimilation and protection policies, was only abandoned in.the lg7Os. It is therefore important to understand the implications of these policies for Aborigines and Australian society in general. I investigate the affect of institutionalisation on Aborigines, questioning the assumption tl.at they were passive victims forced onto missions and government stations and kept there as virtual prisoners. -
Tough(Er) Love Art from Eyre Peninsula
tough(er) love art from Eyre Peninsula COUNTRY ARTS SA LEARNING CONNECTIONS RESOURCE KIT AbOUT THIS RESOURCE KIT This Resource kit is published to accompany the exhibition tough(er) love: art from Eyre Peninsula at the Flinders University City Gallery, February 23 – April 28 2013 and touring regionally with Country Arts SA 2013 – 2015. This Resource kit is designed to support learning outcomes and teaching programs associated with viewing the tough(er) love exhibition by: • Providing information about the artists • Providing information about key works • Exploring Indigenous perspectives within contemporary art • Challenging students to engage with the works and the exhibition’s themes • Identifying ways in which the exhibition can be used as a curriculum resource • Providing strategies for exhibition viewing, as well as pre and post-visit research • It may be used in conjunction with a visit to the exhibition or as a pre-visit or post-visit resource. ACKNOWLEdgEMENTS Resource kit written by John Neylon, art writer, curator and arts education consultant. The writer acknowledges the particular contribution of all the artists and the following people to the development of this resource: COUNTRY ARTS SA Craig Harrison, Manager Artform Development Jayne Holland, Development Officer Western Eyre Penny Camens, Coordinator Arts Programs Anna Goodhind, Coordinator Visual Arts Pip Gare, Web and Communications Officer Tammy Hall, Coordinator Audience Development Beth Wuttke, Graphic Designer FLINDERS UNIVERSITY Fiona Salmon, Director Flinders University Art Museum & City Gallery Celia Dottore, Exhibitions Manager TOUGH(ER) LOVE RESOURCE KIT 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS BACKGROUND . 4 About this exhibition ............................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND The Artists ......................................................................................... 4 BEHIND THE SCENES The Curator ....................................................................................... -
A Response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal Settlements
36 A response to the National Water initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Scotdesco and Davenport Yarilena, initiative from Nepabunna, response to the National Water A A response to the National Water Meryl Pearce Report initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy 36 Scotdesco and Davenport Fiona Ryan Aboriginal settlements Ben Wadham 2008 Meryl Pearce A response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Meryl Pearce Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy Fiona Ryan Ben Wadham 2008 Contributing author information Dr Meryl Pearce is a Senior lecturer in the School of Geography, Population and Environmental Management at Flinders University. Her research focuses on water resource sustainability. Associate Professor Eileen Willis is a sociologist with research interests in Aboriginal health with a social determinants focus. Carmel McCarthy has broad ranging expertise in social, medical, and educational research. Fiona Ryan has participated in research projects related to Aboriginal issues and Aboriginal languages. She has a Masters in Applied Linguistics from Adelaide University and has worked extensively in the area of adult education. Dr Ben Wadham is a senior lecturer in the School of Education, Flinders University. His research has focused on Aboriginal reconciliation and Australian race relations from a governance and policy perspective. Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 36 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. ISBN: 1 74158 085 4 (Print copy) ISBN: 1 74158 086 2 (Online copy) ISSN: 1832 6684 Citation Pearce M, Willis E, McCarthy C, Ryan F and Wadham B. -
Australian Indigenous Petitions
Australian Indigenous Petitions: Emergence and Negotiations of Indigenous Authorship and Writings Chiara Gamboz Dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences October 2012 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT 'l hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the proiect's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed 5 o/z COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 'l hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or digsertation in whole or part in the Univercity libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertiation. -
South Australia by Local Government Area (LGA) Alphabetically
Dementia prevalence estimates 2021-2058 South Australia by local government area (LGA) alphabetically LGA 2021 2058 Adelaide City Council 366 923 Adelaide Hills Council 801 1,363 Adelaide Plains Council 144 373 Alexandrina Council 937 1,406 Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara 15 79 The Barossa Council 596 972 Barunga West 102 77 Berri Barmera Council 292 351 Burnside 1,206 2,055 Campbelltown City Council 1,372 2,383 Ceduna 70 117 Charles Sturt 2,794 5,740 Clare and Gilbert Valleys Council 250 293 Cleve 42 56 Coober Pedy 49 61 Coorong District Council 140 120 Copper Coast Council 489 528 Elliston 22 35 The Flinders Ranges Council 46 49 Franklin Harbour 36 41 Gawler 611 1,227 Goyder 116 132 Grant 156 275 Holdfast Bay 1,091 1,911 Kangaroo Island Council 129 192 Dementia Australia (2018) dementia prevalence data 2018-2058, commissioned research undertaken by NATSEM, University of Canberra. © Dementia Australia 2021 South Australia by local government area (LGA) alphabetically (continued) LGA 2021 2058 Karoonda East Murray 38 34 Kimba 25 34 Kingston District Council 83 69 Light Regional Council 221 353 Lower Eyre Peninsula 109 219 Loxton Waikerie 324 390 Marion 2,043 3,944 Mid Murray Council 263 393 Mitcham 1,589 2,684 Mount Barker District Council 657 1,650 Mount Gambier 627 909 Mount Remarkable 91 86 Murray Bridge 531 911 Naracoorte Lucindale Council 198 295 Northern Areas Council 131 141 Norwood Payneham & St Peters 926 1,754 Onkaparinga 3,578 7,017 Orroroo Carrieton 30 25 Peterborough 59 44 Playford 1,406 3,487 Port Adelaide Enfield 2,506 6,133 Port Augusta City Council 294 484 Port Lincoln 348 451 Port Pirie Regional Council 474 582 Prospect 369 851 These data exclude Gerard Community Council, Maralinga Tjarutja Community Inc, Nepabunna Community Council, Outback Communities Authority and Yalata Community because of very small numbers. -
Eyre and Western Planning Region Vivonne Bay Island Beach Date: February 2020 Local Government Area Other Road
Amata Kalka Kanpi Pipalyatjara Nyapari Pukatja Yunyarinyi Umuwa Kaltjiti Indulkana Mimili Watarru Mintabie Marla S T U A R T Oodnadatta H W Y Cadney Park PASTORAL UNINCORPORATED AREA William Creek Coober Pedy MARALINGA TJARUTJA S Oak Valley T U A R T H W Y Olympic Dam Andamooka Village Roxby Downs Tarcoola S Y TU Kingoonya W AR T H Glendambo H W M Y A PASTORAL D C I P M UNINCORPORATED Y L O Woomera AREA Pimba Nullarbor Roadhouse Yalata EYRE HWY Border Village Nundroo Bookabie Koonibba Coorabie EYRE HWY Penong CEDUNA Fowlers Bay Denial Bay Ceduna Mudamuckla Nunjikompita Smoky Bay F LI Wirrulla Stirling ND E North RS Petina Yantanabie H W Y Courela Port Augusta Haslam E Y Chilpenunda R Cungena E H W Y Blanche STREAKY L EAK D Poochera Harbor TR Y R I S Y N BA Iron Knob C BAY Chandada IR O Minnipa O L F N N Streaky Bay LIN DE K R Buckleboo WHYALLA N H S O Yaninee B W H Y W Iron Baron RD Calca Y Sceale Bay WUDINNA Pygery KIMBA Mullaquana Baird Bay Wudinna Whyalla Point Lowly Colley Mount Damper Kimba Port Kenny EYRE H Kyancutta W Y Warramboo Koongawa Talia Waddikee Venus Bay Y W Kopi H C L Mount Wedge E N L Darke Peak V BIRDSEYE E O H C WY Mangalo Bramfield Lock R IN D FRANKLINL BIR Kielpa Y D SEYE W HWY HARBOUR F ELLISTON H LI Elliston ND Cleve E D Cowell RS Murdinga Rudall O HW T Y Sheringa Alford Tooligie CLEVE Y Wharminda W H Wallaroo Paskeville LN Arno Bay Kadina O Karkoo C Mount Hope TUMBY IN L Moonta Port Neill Kapinnie Yeelanna BAY Agery LOWER EYRE Ungarra PENINSULA Cummins Lipson Arthurton Tumby Bay Balgowan Coulta Koppio Maitland -
2018 Evaluation of the Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council's Makin' Tracks Program
2018 Evaluation of the Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council’s Makin’ Tracks Program Monica Cass National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University May 2019 Preventing harmful drug use in Australia The National Drug Research Institute at Curtin University is supported by funding from the Australian Government under the Drug and Alcohol Program WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Abuse National Drug Research Institute Curtin University GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845 Telephone: (08) 9266 1600 Facsimile: (08) 9266 1611 Email: [email protected] Website: ndri.curtin.edu.au CRICOS Provider Code 00301J ISBN 978-0-6487367-2-1 2019006 2018 Evaluation of the Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council’s Makin’ Tracks Program Dr Monica Cass National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University May 2019 © Copyright, National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, 2019 Suggested citation Cass, M. (2019) 2018 Evaluation of the Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council’s Makin’ Tracks Program. National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia. ii Executive Summary Introduction This report documents the findings from the 2018 evaluation of the Makin’ Tracks project, operated by Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council (ADAC), South Australia (SA). The evaluation was undertaken by the National Drug Research Institute (NDRI), in collaboration with ADAC staff. The purpose of this evaluation was to provide advice to ADAC and its governance and funding bodies as to whether Makin’ Tracks is operating effectively and meeting its key project objectives. Since its inception, it was intended that the program would be evaluated at regular intervals to inform funding bodies and provide recommendations for continued service improvement. -
This Report Includes Historical Photographs of Aboriginal People Who May Have Died, Which May Cause Sadness and Distress to Their Relatives
Manunka Mission Site – Heritage Assessment This report includes historical photographs of Aboriginal people who may have died, which may cause sadness and distress to their relatives. Care and discretion should be used when viewing these images. DASH Architects and Peter Bell 1 Manunka Mission Site – Heritage Assessment HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT NAME: Manunka Mission Site PLACE NO.: 26458 Address: off Manuka Road, Forster, South Australia SUMMARY The place may have cultural significance to local Aboriginal people apart from the operation of Manunka Mission, however this is outside the scope of this assessment and it is covered under different legislation (i.e. the former occupation of the land and Aboriginal burials on site), that being the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 (SA). The Manunka Mission Site is not considered to meet any of the heritage significance criterion under Section 16 of the Heritage Places Act 1993 (SA), and is not recommended for State Heritage listing. Whilst the story of how Janet Matthews operated the non-sectarian mission after her husband’s death along with her family is of some historical interest, her story is recorded in historical accounts and the site is not considered to have sufficient integrity to demonstrate important cultural or historical associations with the Manunka Mission. BRIEF HISTORY OF PLACE: The Manunka Mission Site is located on the eastern side of the River Murray in the area of Forster, about 70km by river north of Mannum (Figure 1). A mission for Aboriginal people operated there from 1902 to 1912. Forster Approx. area of Manunka Mission Site Figure 1 – Aerial view of Forster [labels added by author] [Source: Google Maps 2017] 2 DASH Architects and Peter Bell Manunka Mission Site – Heritage Assessment In 1874, Daniel and Janet Matthews opened a private mission for Aboriginal people at Maloga near Barmah on the River Murray in New South Wales. -
Prevalence Estimates 2021-2058
Dementia in Australia Prevalence estimates 2021-2058 Dementia Australia is the source of trusted information, education and services for the estimated half a million Australians living with dementia, and the almost 1.6 million people involved in their care. We advocate for positive change and support vital research. We are here to support people impacted by dementia, and to enable them to live as well as possible. No matter how you are impacted by dementia or who you are, we are here for you. Dementia is the term used to describe a collection of symptoms that are caused by disorders affecting the brain. Dementia is not one specific disease, it is an umbrella term for a large group of illnesses which cause a progressive decline in a person’s mental functioning. Most people with dementia are over 65 years, but it is important to remember that not all older people get dementia. It is not a normal part of ageing. There are an estimated 472,000 people living with all forms of dementia. Without a major medical breakthrough this figure is projected to increase to 1,076,000 people by 2058. This document presents the breakdown of Dementia Australia’s national prevalence data by state and territory. National Dementia Helpline 1800 100 500 For language assistance call 131 450 Find us online dementia.org.au Australian Capital Territory (ACT) In 2021, there are an estimated 6,360 people living with dementia in the Australian Capital Territory. Without a medical breakthrough, the number of people living with dementia is expected to increase to an estimated 18,900 people by 2058. -
Communities Lock out Coronavirus
Aboriginalboriginal Way www.nativetitlesa.org Issue 78, Autumn 2020 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services Above: Kaurna reburial of ancestors disturbed by Northern Connector project. Read full article on page 6. Communities lock out coronavirus Across South Australia, Aboriginal The closures mean that even residents of The communities’ decisions to shut strict new rules for entry into their communities have braced themselves the communities cannot re-enter if they their doors came after concern for the community on 5 March. against the deadly coronavirus are sick, have travelled overseas recently welfare of Aboriginal people, particularly The APY Art Centre Collective worked (COVID-19), which has swept the or have had contact with someone with people in remote areas grew following for some time to evacuate Elders from world, by closing their doors to the virus. Even if community members are the announcement of the pandemic by the lands, planning for older artists that outside visitors. cleared to return, they need to self-isolate the World Health Organisation. wished to do so to relocate to a boarding The Premier of South Australia announced for 14 days before going back to the According to the Federal Government, house in Adelaide. in March that movement into certain community and to their home. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander The collective, which represents artists remote areas across South Australia peoples and people living in remote Davenport Community Council explained from seven communities across the was restricted. Arrangements for the communities are at greater risk that they took the action to protect their APY Lands, had warned that it would shutdowns were supported and managed from COVID-19.