DOCSLIB.ORG

Remote Housing Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remote Housing Review Remote Housing Review A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) Artwork by Ashlee Burns who is a proud descendant of the Gunggandji and Kuku Djungan people. ‘The artwork was influenced strongly by the nature and land of Australia. The curved parallel lines, also known as stratum, were inspired by sedimentary layers of rock that can be found deep within the earth. All the colours used throughout are representative of the beautiful Australian landscape and the diversity of the earth found across our nation. The use of a stratum lines is meant to represent the many layers found within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history. While the blue symbolises oceans and rivers, the green, orange and the yellow represents the land. Together these elements encapsulate all the differing communities of Australia.’ Copyright Statement ________________________________________________________________________________________ Remote Housing Review: A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 ISBN 978-1-925362-68-8 Remote Housing Review: A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) (PDF) ISBN 978-1-925362-69 Remote Housing Review: A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) (DOCX) ISBN 978-1-925362-70-1 Remote Housing Review: A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) Print Version Copyright Notice With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0)( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). Third party copyright Wherever a third party holds copyright in this material, the copyright remains with that party. Their permission may be required to use the material. Please contact them directly. Attribution This publication should be attributed as follows: © Commonwealth of Australia, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Remote Housing Review: A review of the National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing and the Remote Housing Strategy (2008-2018) Use of the Coat of Arms The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are detailed on the following website: http://www.pmc.gov.au/government/its-honour. Other uses Enquiries regarding this licence and any other use of this document are welcome at: The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet PO Box 6500 CANBERRA ACT 2600 Contents Remote Housing Review ....................................................................................................................... 2 Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 Good progress has been made against the Strategy’s objectives .................................... 1 More needs to be done to meet future demand and to protect the existing housing stock ..................................................................................................................... 2 The Review identified a number of issues in the development and implementation of the Strategy .......................................................................................................... 3 Future programs should protect recent investment, address continued need and develop better structures for design, implementation and oversight ................ 4 Assessment of jurisdictions’ performance against key objectives of the Strategy .......... 5 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Policy change has been the norm ........................................................................ 8 1.3 This Review’s focus – NPARIH and the Strategy ................................................ 10 1.4 Governance of the Review ................................................................................. 13 2. Secure, quality housing is needed for Closing the Gap .................................................. 15 2.1 Health ................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Community safety .............................................................................................. 19 2.3 Employment and education ............................................................................... 19 2.4 Housing impacts everything you’re able to do .................................................. 20 2.5 Key Findings ....................................................................................................... 21 3. Reducing overcrowding in remote Indigenous communities ......................................... 22 3.1 Significant progress has been made to reduce overcrowding........................... 22 3.2 Despite progress overcrowding persists and will worsen over the next ten years, unless further action is taken .................................................................. 23 3.3 Based on current and future demand an additional 5,500 houses are required by 2028............................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Key findings ........................................................................................................ 26 4. Increasing housing supply and improving housing conditions ....................................... 27 4.1 The Strategy has performed well overall against numeric building targets ...... 27 4.2 The substitution of replacements and refurbishments for some part of the new building target was reasonable .......................................................................... 27 4.3 With the exception of Western Australia, each continuing jurisdiction met or exceeded its original COAG targets ................................................................... 28 4.4 Preliminary analysis shows South Australia achieved best value for money .... 29 4.5 Over the course of the Strategy many lessons were learned (or re-learned) ... 30 4.6 Acceptance and defect monitoring are key processes to ensure accountability for building quality ............................................................................................. 36 4.7 The introduction of a two year competitive bids process led to undesirable, and unintended, consequences ................................................................................ 36 4.8 Local engagement, when done well, delivers better housing ........................... 37 4.9 The Strategy also built accommodation to support employment and education outside remote communities............................................................................. 38 4.10 Proper planning of land and infrastructure is essential..................................... 39 4.11 There are challenges with the availability of serviced land for the future ........ 40 4.12 Land reform was a key part of the Strategy ...................................................... 40 4.13 Home ownership has not been a big success of the Strategy ........................... 41 4.14 Key Findings ....................................................................................................... 42 5. Property and Tenancy Management .............................................................................. 44 5.1 The Strategy is the first national program to have such a substantial focus on PTM .................................................................................................................... 44 5.2 Property management is important among lessons already learned but progress has been mixed ................................................................................... 45 5.3 There are further lessons to be learned from the delivery of maintenance services under the Strategy ............................................................................... 48 5.4 Formalising tenancy agreements was a start but tenants are not clear about rights and responsibilities .................................................................................. 49 5.5 There have been positive changes to rental policy and practices but again, there is more to do ............................................................................................ 51 5.6 There is a potential role for ICHOs in the future delivery of remote Indigenous housing ............................................................................................................... 53 5.7 Key Findings ....................................................................................................... 55 6. Indigenous employment and business development outcomes .................................... 56 6.1 Jurisdictions mostly reported they met employment targets ........................... 56 6.2 The Panel found good practice examples but local people say they missed out on jobs ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Store Nutrition Report and Market Basket Survey.Pdf
    Store Nutrition Report and Market Basket Survey April 2014 Nganampa Health Council Erin McLean, Kate Annat and Prof Amanda Lee April 2014 Executive Summary The report provides Market Basket pricing and data analysis of Mai Wiru compliance with standardised food and nutrition checklists from stores on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in South Australia collected in April 2014. The report focuses on the Mai Wiru group stores (Pipalyatjara, Kanpi, Amata, Fregon and Pukatja). Pricing data was also collected from Mimili (Outback Stores), Indulkana (independent) and Coles and IGA Foodlands supermarkets in Alice Springs. The purpose of this report is to provide key recommendations for Mai Wiru store councils to aid decision-making regarding food and nutrition issues. Data was collected in-store from 7-11 April 2014. Information was collected on the price, availability and promotion of foods, as well as Mai Wiru store achievement of the Remote Indigenous Stores and Takeaways (RIST) checklist benchmarks and implementation of nutrition recommendations from the previous Market Basket report (September, 2013). Nutrition promotion activities were also performed in all the Mai Wiru stores, including one pot cooking demonstrations and installation of sugar-in-food displays and posters. Results show that, in April 2014, Mai Wiru stores: • Are clean, functional and well stocked; • Provide a wide range of healthy foods and beverages; and • Price healthy foods at a competitive rate for remote areas. In April 2014 the average price of the Market Basket in the Mai Wiru stores was $734 dollars and had increased only 0.3% since September 2014. In comparison to the other stores monitored during the same period the Mai Wiru store prices were 4.3% less than Mimili, 1.0% more than Indulkana, only 13.0% more than Alice Springs IGA Foodlands and 34.4% more than Coles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Long Way to Go in Nuclear Debate, Says Aboriginal Congress of SA
    Aboriginal Way Issue 60, Spring 2015 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services Aboriginal Congress of South Australia A long way to go in nuclear debate, says Aboriginal Congress of SA In early August, the Aboriginal During July and August, the Royal Parry Agius, Alinytjara Wiluara Natural waste dump” and the Royal Commission Congress of South Australia Commission engaged regional and Resources Board Member reinforced the is nothing more than mere formality. convened in Port Augusta to remote communities including Coober notion of an appropriate timeline in his Karina Lester, Aboriginal Congress discuss the issues and concerns Pedy, Oak Valley, Ceduna, Port Lincoln, submission. Mr Agius wrote, “we note of SA member said it is clear by the of potential expansion of uranium Port Augusta, Whyalla, Port Pirie, levels of concern within our communities submissions to the Royal Commission mining in SA, including the Ernabella, Fregon, Mimili, Indulkana, that suggest that the timeframe for that Aboriginal People do not support development of a nuclear Ceduna, Amata, Kanpi and Pipalyatjara. consultation on the risks and opportunities the Nuclear Fuel Cycle. waste dump. through the Royal Commission is Aboriginal Congress of SA Chair, insufficient”. Through the initial “Our views are clear in the submissions The State Government launched a Tauto Sansbury said the engagement conversations with community members and we need to ensure that this gets public inquiry on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle with Aboriginal Communities is there is, he added, “a level of confusion across to the Commissioner. We need by calling a Royal Commission in March. welcomed however the consultation about what was being discussed”.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Design Issuesceduna Aboriginal Children and Family
    INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ 2 INDIGENOUS DESIGN ISSUES: CEDUNA ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AND FAMILY CENTRE ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 ACKNOWELDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 PART 1: PRECEDENTS AND “BEST PRACTICE„ DESIGN ....................................................10 The Design of Early Learning, Child-care and Children and Family Centres for Aboriginal People ..................................................................................................................................10 Conceptions of Quality ........................................................................................................ 10 Precedents: Pre-Schools, Kindergartens, Child and Family Centres ..................................12 Kulai Aboriginal Preschool .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Agency, Institutionalisation and Survival
    2q' t '9à ABORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND PEGGY BROCK B. A. (Hons) Universit¡r of Adelaide Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History/Geography, University of Adelaide March f99f ll TAT}LE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TAE}LES AND MAPS iii SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABBREVIATIONS ix C}IAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION I CFIAPTER TWO. TI{E HISTORICAL CONTEXT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 32 CHAPTER THREE. POONINDIE: HOME AWAY FROM COUNTRY 46 POONINDIE: AN trSTä,TILISHED COMMUNITY AND ITS DESTRUCTION 83 KOONIBBA: REFUGE FOR TI{E PEOPLE OF THE VI/EST COAST r22 CFIAPTER SIX. KOONIBBA: INSTITUTIONAL UPHtrAVAL AND ADJUSTMENT t70 C}IAPTER SEVEN. DISPERSAL OF KOONIBBA PEOPLE AND THE END OF TI{E MISSION ERA T98 CTIAPTER EIGHT. SURVTVAL WITHOUT INSTITUTIONALISATION236 C}IAPTER NINtr. NEPABUNNA: THtr MISSION FACTOR 268 CFIAPTER TEN. AE}ORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND SURVTVAL 299 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 320 ltt TABLES AND MAPS Table I L7 Table 2 128 Poonindie location map opposite 54 Poonindie land tenure map f 876 opposite 114 Poonindie land tenure map f 896 opposite r14 Koonibba location map opposite L27 Location of Adnyamathanha campsites in relation to pastoral station homesteads opposite 252 Map of North Flinders Ranges I93O opposite 269 lv SUMMARY The institutionalisation of Aborigines on missions and government stations has dominated Aboriginal-non-Aboriginal relations. Institutionalisation of Aborigines, under the guise of assimilation and protection policies, was only abandoned in.the lg7Os. It is therefore important to understand the implications of these policies for Aborigines and Australian society in general. I investigate the affect of institutionalisation on Aborigines, questioning the assumption tl.at they were passive victims forced onto missions and government stations and kept there as virtual prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • PITJANTJATJARA Council Inc. FINDING
    PITJANTJATJARA MS 1497 PITJANTJATJARA Council Inc. FINDING AID Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library MS 1497 PITJANTJATJARA COUNCIL ARCHIVES A3a/B1 Minutes of meetings of the Pitjanjatjara Council 1976-1981 Originals and copies (see also MS 1168) In English and Pitjantjatjara Contents: I. Pitjantjatjara Council Inc. Minutes of meetings (originals) 1) Amata, SA, 13 July 1976, 11 p., map 2) Docker River, NT, 7 September 1976, 6p. 3) Ipdulkana, 1 December 1976, 8p. 4) Blackstone (Papalankutja), WA, 22-23 February 1977, 12p. 5) Ernabella (Pukatja), SA, 19-20 April 1977, 5p. 6) Warburton, WA, 21 -22 June 1977, 10p. 7) Amata, SA, 3 August 1977, 4p. (copy) 8) Ernabella, SA, 26-27 September 1977, 4p. 9) Puta Puta, SA, 28-29 November 1977, 7p. 10) Fregon, SA, 21-22 February 1978, 9p. 11) Mantamaru (Jamieson), WA, 2-3 May 1978, 6p. 12) Pipalyatjara, SA, 17-18 July 1978, 6p. 13) Mimili, SA, 3-4 October 1978, 10p. 14) Uluru (Ayers Rock), NT, 4-5 December 1978, 6p. 15) Irrunytju (Wingelinna), 7-8 February 1979, 6p. 16) Amata, SA, 3-4 April 1979, 6p. • No minutes issued for June and August 1979 meetings 17) Nyapari, SA, 15-16 November 1979, 9p. 18)lndulkana, 10-11 December 1979, 6p. 19) Adelaide, SA, 13-14 February 1980, 6p. 20) Adelaide, SA, 13-14 February 1980 - unofficial report by WH Edwards, 2p. 21) Blackstone (Papulankutja), WA, 17-18 April 1980,3p. 22) Jamieson (Mantamaru), WA, 22 July 1980, 4p. 23) Katjikatjitjara, 10-11 November 1980, 4p. (copy) 24) Docker River, 9-11 February 1981, 5p.
    [Show full text]
  • Tough(Er) Love Art from Eyre Peninsula
    tough(er) love art from Eyre Peninsula COUNTRY ARTS SA LEARNING CONNECTIONS RESOURCE KIT AbOUT THIS RESOURCE KIT This Resource kit is published to accompany the exhibition tough(er) love: art from Eyre Peninsula at the Flinders University City Gallery, February 23 – April 28 2013 and touring regionally with Country Arts SA 2013 – 2015. This Resource kit is designed to support learning outcomes and teaching programs associated with viewing the tough(er) love exhibition by: • Providing information about the artists • Providing information about key works • Exploring Indigenous perspectives within contemporary art • Challenging students to engage with the works and the exhibition’s themes • Identifying ways in which the exhibition can be used as a curriculum resource • Providing strategies for exhibition viewing, as well as pre and post-visit research • It may be used in conjunction with a visit to the exhibition or as a pre-visit or post-visit resource. ACKNOWLEdgEMENTS Resource kit written by John Neylon, art writer, curator and arts education consultant. The writer acknowledges the particular contribution of all the artists and the following people to the development of this resource: COUNTRY ARTS SA Craig Harrison, Manager Artform Development Jayne Holland, Development Officer Western Eyre Penny Camens, Coordinator Arts Programs Anna Goodhind, Coordinator Visual Arts Pip Gare, Web and Communications Officer Tammy Hall, Coordinator Audience Development Beth Wuttke, Graphic Designer FLINDERS UNIVERSITY Fiona Salmon, Director Flinders University Art Museum & City Gallery Celia Dottore, Exhibitions Manager TOUGH(ER) LOVE RESOURCE KIT 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS BACKGROUND . 4 About this exhibition ............................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND The Artists ......................................................................................... 4 BEHIND THE SCENES The Curator .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Far Removed: an Insight Into the Labour Markets of Remote Communities in Central Australia
    145 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF LABOUR ECONOMICS VOLUME 19 • NUMBER 3 • 2016 Far Removed: An Insight into the Labour Markets of Remote Communities in Central Australia Michael Dockery, Curtin Business School Judith Lovell, Charles Darwin University Abstract There are ongoing debates about the livelihoods of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians living in remote communities, and the role for policy in addressing socio- economic equity and the economic viability of those communities. The characteristics and dynamics of remote labour markets are important parameters in many of these debates. However, remote economic development discourses are often conducted with limited access to empirical evidence of the actual functioning of labour markets in remote communities – evidence that is likely to have important implications for the efficacy of policy alternatives. Unique survey data collected from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders living in 21 remote communities in central Australia for the Cooperative Research Centre for Remote Economic Participation’s Population Mobility and Labour Markets project are used to examine these labour markets, with a focus on the role of education and training. Examining access to education, employment opportunity and other structural factors, it is clear that the reality of economic engagement in these communities is far removed from the functioning of mainstream labour markets. The assumptions about, or lack of distinction between remote and urban locations, have contributed to misunderstanding of the assets and capabilities remote communities have, and aspire to develop. Evidence from the survey data on a number of fronts is interpreted to suggest policies to promote employment opportunity within communities offer greater potential for improving the livelihoods of remote community residents than policies reliant on the assumption that residents will move elsewhere for work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal Settlements
    36 A response to the National Water initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Scotdesco and Davenport Yarilena, initiative from Nepabunna, response to the National Water A A response to the National Water Meryl Pearce Report initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy 36 Scotdesco and Davenport Fiona Ryan Aboriginal settlements Ben Wadham 2008 Meryl Pearce A response to the National Water Initiative from Nepabunna, Yarilena, Scotdesco and Davenport Aboriginal settlements Meryl Pearce Eileen Willis Carmel McCarthy Fiona Ryan Ben Wadham 2008 Contributing author information Dr Meryl Pearce is a Senior lecturer in the School of Geography, Population and Environmental Management at Flinders University. Her research focuses on water resource sustainability. Associate Professor Eileen Willis is a sociologist with research interests in Aboriginal health with a social determinants focus. Carmel McCarthy has broad ranging expertise in social, medical, and educational research. Fiona Ryan has participated in research projects related to Aboriginal issues and Aboriginal languages. She has a Masters in Applied Linguistics from Adelaide University and has worked extensively in the area of adult education. Dr Ben Wadham is a senior lecturer in the School of Education, Flinders University. His research has focused on Aboriginal reconciliation and Australian race relations from a governance and policy perspective. Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 36 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. ISBN: 1 74158 085 4 (Print copy) ISBN: 1 74158 086 2 (Online copy) ISSN: 1832 6684 Citation Pearce M, Willis E, McCarthy C, Ryan F and Wadham B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ountry Edition 1 |2012
    Caring for Alinytjara Wilurara Natural Resources Management Board ountry Edition 1 |2012 From the Road, Urrbrae) where we are in strong partnerships with Aboriginal Regional Manager’s Desk close proximity to State and Federal stakeholders and communities across Government partners (also located the region. Some of the fantastic at the Waite). This will assist us in outcomes which have been delivered strengthening partnerships and are highlighted in this newsletter. Palya! delivery arrangements. Personally, I am extremely excited The Alinytjara Wilurara (AW) region The Waite is located amongst beautiful about what the next 12-24 months has gone through some major changes surrounds, and we encourage our holds for the AW region. Enjoy! over the past year. The Department of regional partners to drop in whenever Environment, and Natural Resources they come to the big smoke. Matt Ward amalgamated with the Department A/Regional Manager of Water on 1 July to form our new We also have some significant changes Natural Resources - Alinytjara Wilurara Department of Environment, Water in staff. We will be welcoming our DEWNR and Natural Resources (DEWNR). With new and very experienced Regional full transition complete all Alinytjara Manager to the team in October, we Wilurara Natural Resouces (AW NR) have a new Regional Project Officer, staff are now employed by DEWNR. As Nathan Williams who recently started Contents in Ceduna and who by all reports is such we will continue to deliver Caring This issue... for Country projects and implement doing an exceptional job and Helen the AW NRM Regional Plan in Donald, our new Communications/ Regional Manager’s Update Executive Officer who has hit the partnership with the AW NRM Board, Fire Mangement Strategy communities and other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 20 17 Who We Are
    Annual Report 20 17 Who We Are The Lowitja Institute is Australia’s national institute for Strait Islander control of the research agenda, a Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. It broader understanding of health that incorporates is an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisation wellbeing, and the need for the work to have a clear working for the health and wellbeing of Australia’s and positive impact. First Peoples through high impact quality research, The Lowitja Institute hosts the Lowitja Institute knowledge translation, and by supporting a new Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health CRC generation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander funded by the Cooperative Research Centres health researchers. Programme of the Australian Government Established in January 2010, the Lowitja Institute Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. operates on key principles of Aboriginal and Torres The Lowitja Institute is a company limited by guarantee with the following membership: Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association | Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies | Central Australian Aboriginal Congress | Congress of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nurses and Midwives | Danila Dilba Health Service | Flinders University | Healing Foundation | Indigenous Allied Health Australia | Menzies School of Health Research | National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Worker Association | QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute | The University of Melbourne OUR PATRON Dr Lowitja O’Donoghue was born in 1932 at Indulkana, in north-west corner South Australia, to a Pitjantjatjara mother and an Irish father. At the age of two, she and two of her sisters were taken away from their mother on behalf of South Australia’s Aboriginal Protection Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Indigenous Petitions
    Australian Indigenous Petitions: Emergence and Negotiations of Indigenous Authorship and Writings Chiara Gamboz Dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of Arts and Media Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences October 2012 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT 'l hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the proiect's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed 5 o/z COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 'l hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or digsertation in whole or part in the Univercity libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Water Supplies in the APY Lands.Pdf
    Kapi Nganampa Community water supplies in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands, South Australia: sustainability of groundwater resources A.R. Dodds, S. Hostetler, and G. Jacobson ©Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISSN 1039-0073 ISBN 0 642 47573 3 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages , tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Executive Director, Bureau of Rural Sciences, P.O. Box Ell, Kingston, ACT 2604. Department of AGRICULTURE FISHERIES and FORESTRY • AUSTRALIA The Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) is the science agency within the Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry - Australia. Published by: Bureau of Rural Sciences PO BoxEll Kingston, ACT 2604 Telephone: (02) 6272 4282 Facsimile: (02) 6272 4747 Internet: http://www.affa.gov.au Copies available from: AFFA Shopfront GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6272 5550 Fax: (02) 6272 5771 Email: shopfront@affa.gov.au Preferred way to cite this publication: Dodds, A.R., Hostetler, S.D., and Jacobson, G. (2001) Community water supplies in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Lands, South Australia: sustainability of groundwater resources. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. This report does not represent professional advice given by the Commonwealth or any other person acting for the Commonwealth for any particular purpose. It should not be relied on as the basis for any decision to take action on any matter which it covers.
    [Show full text]