DOCSLIB.ORG

GEI Report Template Feb2009 and Msword 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEI Report Template Feb2009 and Msword 2007 Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District July 2017 Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814-2922 Contact: Name: Melissa Montag Title: Senior Environmental Manager Phone: 916-557-7907 Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 (916) 631-4500 Contact: Barry Scott, RPA Senior Archaeologist (916) 213.2767 July 17, 2017 Barry Scott, MA, RPA Senior Archaeologist Project No. 1602400 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary and Content of Document .................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Description of the Undertaking ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Application of the Historic Properties Management Plan .......................... 1-1 1.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Description of the Undertaking ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Project Purpose and Need ................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.3 Area of Potential Effects ..................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.4 Description of the Undertaking ........................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Regulatory Context ........................................................................................................ 1-14 1.3.1 Federal ............................................................................................................. 1-14 1.3.2 State ................................................................................................................. 1-18 1.4 Permits and Rights-of-Entry .......................................................................................... 1-21 1.4.1 Rights-of-Entry .................................................................................................. 1-21 1.4.2 Permits.............................................................................................................. 1-21 Chapter 2. General Standards and Procedures ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Professional Qualifications .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Archaeology ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 History................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.3 Architectural History ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Documentation Standards ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Area of Potential Effects Maps ........................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Inventory and Evaluation Reports ...................................................................... 2-2 2.2.3 Findings of Effect ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.4 Historic Property Treatment Plans ..................................................................... 2-3 2.2.5 Monitoring and Discovery Plans ......................................................................... 2-3 2.2.6 Training Materials ............................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.7 Post-Construction Reports ................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.8 Treatment Reports .............................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.9 Other Reports ..................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Dissemination and Confidentiality of Information ............................................................ 2-4 2.4 Curation ........................................................................................................................... 2-5 Chapter 3. Context ........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Cultural Context ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Prehistoric Archaeology in the Sacramento Valley ............................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Prehistory of the Sacramento Valley .................................................................. 3-6 3.1.3 Ethnographic Overview .................................................................................... 3-15 3.1.4 Historic Context ................................................................................................ 3-27 3.2 Environmental Context .................................................................................................. 3-45 3.2.1 Regional Surface Geology and Geomorphology .............................................. 3-45 3.2.2 Climate.............................................................................................................. 3-52 3.2.3 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................... 3-53 Chapter 4. Cultural Resources Identification Methods ............................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Records and Literature Search ....................................................................................... 4-1 American River Common Features Project GEI Consultants, Inc. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers i Table of Contents 4.2 Area of Potential Effects Map Delineation ....................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Surveys and Documentation ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment Procedures ....................................................... 4-5 4.4.1 Purpose of the Sensitivity Assessment .............................................................. 4-5 4.4.2 Methods .............................................................................................................. 4-6 4.4.3 Procedures ......................................................................................................... 4-8 4.4.4 Use of Sensitivity Assessment ........................................................................... 4-8 4.5 Identification of Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscapes ...................... 4-8 4.6 Special Process for Geotechnical Investigations .......................................................... 4-10 4.7 Built-Environment Resources ........................................................................................ 4-11 4.7.1 Resource Types ............................................................................................... 4-11 4.7.2 Resource Recordation ...................................................................................... 4-13 Chapter 5. Consultation with Knowledgeable Individuals, Groups and Native American Consultation Procedures ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Consultation with Knowledgeable Individuals and Groups ............................................. 5-1 5.2 Native American Consultation ......................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 5-2 5.2.2 Procedures ......................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.3 Native American Burials ..................................................................................... 5-5 Chapter 6. Identification of Historic Properties ......................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Defining Cultural Resources ............................................................................................ 6-1 6.1.1 Prehistoric Resource Types ............................................................................... 6-2 6.1.2 Historic Archaeological Sites .............................................................................. 6-5 6.1.3 Traditional Cultural Properties, Sacred Sites, Landscapes, and Archaeological Districts ...................................................................................... 6-6 6.1.4 Properties Exempt from Evaluation .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX a Transportation Study
    APPENDIX A Transportation Study Submitted by: 2990 Lava Ridge Court Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 DRAFT OCTOBER 2011 Chapter 4|THE PLAN Exhibit 4-1. Preferred Alternative Plan Prepared for: Old Sacramento State Historic Park General Plan and EIR | Page 4-5 Final Transportation Study for the Old Sacramento State Historic Park and California State Railroad Museum General Plan December 2011 RS10-2810 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................. 1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................... 3 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Standards of Significance ........................................................................................................................... 4 Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 6 2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 9 Project Area Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference of Indigenous Archives, Libraries, and Museums
    PRESENTER REVIEW PROGRAM – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION/PROVIDED FOR EDITING PURPOSES ONLY International Conference of Indigenous Archives, Libraries, and Museums November 30-December 2, 2020 Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE COLOR CODES About the ATALM 2020 Artist and Artwork To help you more easily locate the sessions that relate to your interests, sessions are color coded by primary Schedule at a Glance focus area and than a secondary topic. The secondary topics sorrespond with the 11 Professional Helpful Information Development Certificates offered. Primary Focus Areas: Conference Volunteers Archives About ATALM Libraries Museums Message from Walter Echo-Hawk Secondary Topics/Professional Development Supporters Certificates: IMLS Workshops, Page 2 Archives Management Summits, Page 2 Artist Engagement Tours and Workshops, Page 3 Collections Care Conference, Day 1, Page 8 Community Engagment Conference, Day 2, Page 27 Collaborative Projects Digitization Exhibitors Exhibit Design Native Art Market Historic Preservation Guardians of Culture and Lifeways Honorees Language Revitalization Presenter Biographies, Page 46 Oral History Roster of Attendees Preventive Conservation Property Map PAGE | 1 ASSOCIATION OF TRIBAL ARCHIVES, LIBRARIES, AND MUSEUMS International Conference of Indigenous Archives, Libraries, and Museums November 30-December 2, 2020 Washington, DC 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. – Registration and Volunteer Desk Open, Grand Ballroom Foyer Monday, November 30 – Institute of Museum and Library Services Meetings These sessions are by invitation. There is no charge to attend. Congressional A 1 Institute of Museum and Library Services Native Libraries American/Native Hawaiian Museum Services Awardee Meeting Monday, November 30, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Full day meeting for all current IMLS Native American/Native Hawaiian Museum Service awardees.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Art Implementation Budget
    CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 5 SECTION 1 . BACKGROUND . 9 SECTION 2 . PROPOSED ART CONCEPTS . 25 SECTION 3 . IMPLEMENTATION . 69 APPENDICES . 79 APPENDIX A: PRELIMINARY ENGAGEMENT AND SURVEY SUMMARY APPENDIX B: COLLECTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY intentions for art investments, the WDPAIP will expand PURPOSE opportunities to integrate art into the planning, funding, Public art helps to support a vibrant urban riverfront. and design of capital improvement projects and new It encourages pedestrian, scooter, and bicycle travel private investment. The WDPAIP builds upon the by adding visual interest and wayfinding to the public interaction between the development and redevelopment streetscape and enriching the pedestrian and bicycling of new housing and commercial projects with walkability, experience. Public art is a driver of local economic transportation pathways and nodes, iconic architecture, development and has the potential to catalyze and foster the River Walk, and historical landmarks. Anselm Keifer Sculpture, London community identity. The Washington District Public Art Implementation Plan (WDPAIP) defines a distinct art POLICY CONTEXT West Sacramento, and the Crocker Art Museum, to create investment strategy to foster transit-oriented, pedestrian- a comprehensive plan for public art and arts experiences A primary impetus for the plan is Washington Realized, and bike-friendly development patterns. This Plan connecting both cities with pedestrian-friendly pathways. A Sustainable Community Strategy, which was adopted in provides guidance the City will use to develop public 2015 as a framework for updating the 1996 Washington artworks that highlight the Riverfront, gateway corridors, District Specific Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j390d9 No online items Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Sean Heyliger Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 1 Planning Department records Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Collection number: CTY0008 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Sean Heyliger Date Completed: 2019-08-19 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Dates: 1955-2008 Bulk Dates: 1976-1996 Collection number: CTY0008 Creator: Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department Collection Size: 16 boxes(16 linear feet) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department records consist of 16 boxes of Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted mostly between 1976-1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation desingation and a photograph of the structure. Physical location: 7H1, 7H2, 7I1 Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research use. Publication Rights All requests to publish or quote from private collections held by the Center for Sacramento History (CSH) must be submitted in writing to [email protected]. Permission for publication is given on behalf of CSH as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the patron.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project
    Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 July 16, 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 Contact: Jennifer Parson Senior Environmental Planner Prepared by: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Suzanne Enslow Project Manager 18010209.01 July 16, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... vi 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Requiring Environmental Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Intended Uses of this Draft EIR ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of this Draft EIR ................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Agency Roles and Responsibilities
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum 13-1
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 13-1 Native American Traditional Cultural Properties Yuba River Development Project FERC Project No. 2246 December 2012 ©2012, Yuba County Water Agency All Rights Reserved Yuba County Water Agency Yuba River Development Project FERC Project No. 2246 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 13-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yuba County Water Agency (YCWA) conducted a Native American Traditional Cultural Properties (TCP) Study for the Yuba River Development Project (Project), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Project Number 2246, from March 2009 through July 2012. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) encompassed 4,306 acres, including the FERC Project Boundary and a 200-foot radius surrounding New Bullards Bar Reservoir. YCWA requested the State Historic Preservation Officer’s (SHPO) concurrence on the APE in a letter dated March 21, 2012, and received SHPO’s concurrence in a letter dated April 19, 2012, in accordance with 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section (§) 800. For relicensing of the Project, FERC designated YCWA as FERC’s non-federal representative for purposes of consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and the implementing regulations found in 36 CFR § 800.2(c)(4). YCWA conducted several consultation meetings with tribes and agencies beginning in 2009 and continuing into 2012. YCWA, tribes, and agencies collaboratively developed study proposals and selection of the TCP Study ethnographer, Albion Environmental, Inc. Invitations to participate in each meeting were sent to tribal representatives, FERC, SHPO, Plumas National Forest, and Tahoe National Forest. Most of these individuals and organizations participated in the meetings. On October 19, 2011, YCWA convened a meeting of tribal groups and agencies to introduce members of YCWA’s team, discuss the FERC-approved study, and to initiate field consultation with the tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Elders: Cultivating Indigenous North Central California
    HIYA ‘AA MA PICHAS ‘OPE MA HAMMAKO HE MA PAP’OYYISKO (LET US UNDERSTAND AGAIN OUR GRANDMOTHERS AND OUR GRANDFATHERS): MAP OF THE ELDERS: CULTIVATING INDIGENOUS NORTH CENTRAL CALIFORNIA CONSCIOUSNESS A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Diveena S. Marcus 2016 Indigenous Studies Ph.D. Graduate Program September 2016 ABSTRACT Hiya ʼAa Ma Pichas ʼOpe Ma Hammako He Ma Papʼoyyisko (Let Us Understand Again Our Grandmothers and Our Grandfathers): Map of the Elders, Cultivating Indigenous North Central California Consciousness By Diveena S. Marcus The Tamalko (Coast Miwok) North Central California Indigenous people have lived in their homelands since their beginnings. California Indigenous people have suffered violent and uncompromising colonial assaults since European contact began in the 16th century. However, many contemporary Indigenous Californians are thriving today as they reclaim their Native American sovereign rights, cultural renewal, and well- being. Culture Bearers are working diligently as advocates and teachers to re-cultivate Indigenous consciousness and knowledge systems. The Tamalko author offers Indigenous perspectives for hinak towis hennak (to make a good a life) through an ethno- autobiographical account based on narratives by Culture Bearers from four Indigenous North Central California Penutian-speaking communities and the author’s personal experiences. A Tamalko view of finding and speaking truth hinti wuskin ʼona (what the heart says) has been the foundational principle of the research method used to illuminate and illustrate Indigenous North Central California consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 20, July 24, 1986
    MINUTE ITEM This Calel'!dar Item No. ~ 0 w:-s acorc·... ;d as f':!inute Item No. a:o b·: t:~~ S . .:re Lands Co·nmiss!.:·n· :y c vote 9J--L to 0 c:t its ~/;z.,.. h:tL: m..:~ting. CALENDAR ITEM 20 A 10 07 /24./86 . w 20936 PRC 7001 s 6 A. Scott Hadly APPROVAL OF A 49-YEAR PUBLIC AGENCY ~~ASE APPLICANT: City of Sacramento Attn: "Doc" Wisham City Hall 91S "I" Street Sacramento, California 95814 BACKGROUND: The City of Sacramento has during the past years been in the process of developing "Old Sacra~ento" as a historically correct recreation of the area as it appeared in the early 1850's. As part of this process, the City has proposed the development of the waterfront in a manner that would depict the riuer front as it was in the same-time frame as the "Old Sacramento" development. lhe City has begun the construction of the necessary improvements along the river such as docks, piers, buildings and floating vessels which are historically correct in their placement and outward appearance. These improvements ~ill be used for commercial income producing ~ctivities as well as other non-income generating public uses. lbe City has funded the construction of the necessary public facilities and some of the access structures leading to private developments located on the ,river. Funding for this construction has been through the City's Redevelopment Agency and construction has occurred over the past several years. The first major commercial development the "Delta King" is to be located on the waterfront before the end of this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Study
    DRAFT CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY SACRAMENTO AGGREGATES EXPANSION SITE PROJECT SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 2019 DRAFT CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY SACRAMENTO AGGREGATES EXPANSION SITE PROJECT SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Kevin Torell Area Manager – Permitting II Vulcan Materials – Western Region 50 El Charro Road Pleasanton, CA 94588 Prepared by: Katie Vallaire, M.A., RPA Mariko Falke, B.A. Rhea Sanchez, M.A. LSA Associates, Inc. 4200 Rocklin Road, Suite 11B Rocklin, California 95677 Project No. VMC1601 May 2019 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES S TUDY S ACRAMENTO A GGREGATES E XPANSION S ITE P ROJECT M AY 2019 S ACRAMENTO C OUNTY, C ALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 2 2.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Carli Property Description .................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 Non‐Disturbance Areas .......................................................................................................... 2 2.2.2 Proposed Carli Mining Area ................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Mine Plan ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • David L. Joslyn Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cr618s No online items Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the David L. Joslyn MS0056 1 papers Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Collection number: MS0056 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Date Completed: 1979 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: David L. Joslyn papers Dates: circa 1850-1963 Bulk Dates: 1875-1948 Collection number: MS0056 Creator: Joslyn, David L. Collection Size: 2.5 linear feet(2 boxes) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The David L. Joslyn papers consist of photographs and manuscripts mostly documenting Joslyn's work as a photographer and his early memories of living in Sacramento, California. Most of the photographs were taken by David Joslyn during the 1920's while he was an employee of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Therefore, many of the photos deal with the Southern Pacific and Central Pacific Railroad Lines. Some of the photographs are copied from earlier photos, drawings and lithographs. Joslyn also took numerous photographs of the State Capitol and the surrounding park as well as many shots from rooftops around the area of downtown Sacramento. These photographs are invaluable when searching for specific locations or businesses in early 20th century Sacramento.
    [Show full text]