DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Art Implementation Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Art Implementation Budget CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 5 SECTION 1 . BACKGROUND . 9 SECTION 2 . PROPOSED ART CONCEPTS . 25 SECTION 3 . IMPLEMENTATION . 69 APPENDICES . 79 APPENDIX A: PRELIMINARY ENGAGEMENT AND SURVEY SUMMARY APPENDIX B: COLLECTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY intentions for art investments, the WDPAIP will expand PURPOSE opportunities to integrate art into the planning, funding, Public art helps to support a vibrant urban riverfront. and design of capital improvement projects and new It encourages pedestrian, scooter, and bicycle travel private investment. The WDPAIP builds upon the by adding visual interest and wayfinding to the public interaction between the development and redevelopment streetscape and enriching the pedestrian and bicycling of new housing and commercial projects with walkability, experience. Public art is a driver of local economic transportation pathways and nodes, iconic architecture, development and has the potential to catalyze and foster the River Walk, and historical landmarks. Anselm Keifer Sculpture, London community identity. The Washington District Public Art Implementation Plan (WDPAIP) defines a distinct art POLICY CONTEXT West Sacramento, and the Crocker Art Museum, to create investment strategy to foster transit-oriented, pedestrian- a comprehensive plan for public art and arts experiences A primary impetus for the plan is Washington Realized, and bike-friendly development patterns. This Plan connecting both cities with pedestrian-friendly pathways. A Sustainable Community Strategy, which was adopted in provides guidance the City will use to develop public 2015 as a framework for updating the 1996 Washington artworks that highlight the Riverfront, gateway corridors, District Specific Plan. The Washington Specific Plan PHYSICAL CONTEXT and transportation pathways and nodes. The Washington governs land use in the 194-acre urban mixed-use District Public Art Implementation Plan also provides The Washington District is described by the community Washington District, located along the Sacramento material that will be included in the updated Washington as the “region’s best kept secret.” The District is River north of Tower Bridge Gateway. Washington Specific Plan, within chapters addressing circulation and undergoing significant change, consistent with the Realized sets forth a Complete Community strategy that parks. Washington Realized Transit-Oriented Development includes a combined public art and recreational needs and Strategy. This historic neighborhood is next to the opportunities analysis. Sacramento River, but separated from it by a levee with GOAL park and recreational improvements. This Is the River The WDPAIP was also initiated as a result of a 2015 Walk. The River Walk is an area with pedestrian and The goal of the WDPAIP is to help create a more National Endowment for the Arts Our Town grant, bike path, stairs, small plazas, and a rolling lawn down beautiful, sustainable, and vibrant Washington District. “River Crossing,” which is a collaboration among the to the River with an existing collection of artworks and By establishing the priority locations and specific Sacramento Metropolitan Arts Commission, the City of CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY historic markers. A new Dock is being constructed in OBJECTIVES CONTENTS the southern portion of the Park, which will include the “River Crossing” art installation. Many of the artworks The Art Plan has the capacity to: The Washington District Public Art Implementation proposed in the WDPAIP address the river connection, Plan (WDPAIP) provides the requirements, guidelines, Create a sense of place that is specific to the mark gateways or entryways, enliven places, adorn future strategies, goals, and policies that address the important Washington District and its Grand Gateway area park sites, and provide opportunities to celebrate the role of art in supporting transit-oriented development Create synergy among public agencies, private community’s history. of the Washington District. Artistic elements and institutions, and businesses “moments” are integrated into the circulation, Promote civic pride and identity infrastructure, and civic and park amenities of the COLLABORATION Encourage residents and visitors to choose District as essential features for walkability, identity pedestrian, bicycle, and transit travel One of the components of this Plan is collaboration (placemaking), and security. Not only will this Celebrate and reflect West Sacramento’s diversity, with Sacramento and the Crocker Art Museum, “River promote the arts within the neighborhood, it will also history, and character Crossing” (funded by the National Endowment for the encourage new investment in transit-served, mixed- Provide a sense of physical orientation Arts). The River Crossing Plan identifies key connection use development, inform the design of other public Increase tourism and economic vitality strategies to be undertaken by Sacramento and West and private development, and be a catalyst for broader, Establish an arts district around the Riverfront and Sacramento that create an arts district with pathways sustained discussions about civic design. linking Sacramento sports and entertainment venues, key sports and entertainment destinations new residential development in the Washington District, Present a cohesive art program that can be delivered This Plan is organized into three primary parts: and a future Crocker Sculpture Park. This Plan will be in 10 years Background (policy basis, summary of community combined with the Sacramento Central City Specific Plan outreach, and the existing inventory) Art Element for submission as the National Endowment Proposed Art Concepts for the Arts River Crossing Plan. Implementation CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE CITY COUNCIL Aaron Laurel, City Manager Mayor Christopher Cabaldon Mayor Pro Tem Quirina Orozco ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Council Member Martha Guerrero AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT Council Member Chris Ledesma Council Member Beverly “Babs” Sandeen Katy Jacobson, Economic Development and Housing Director ARTS, CULTURE, AND Katie Yancey, Community Investment Manager HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING PARTNERS COMMISSION The Cultural Planning Group, San Francisco and Soquel, CA Christy Jourdan, Chair AECOM, 300 California Street, San Francisco, CA Julia McMichael, Vice Chair and 2020 L Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA Melinda Garcia, Commissioner LaBasse Projects, 654 North Spring Street, Los Don Schatzel, Commissioner Angeles, CA Denice Domke, Commissioner Gail Klauer, Commissioner Alfonso Voychez, Commissioner Alisha Olson, Alternate Member CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8 9 SECTION 1. BACKGROUND 10 BACKGROUND CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN BACKGROUND 11 SECTION 1. BACKGROUND POLICY BASIS documents will strengthen the role art plays in furthering the policy objectives of the City and enhance the benefits The WDPAIP is intended to reinforce and provide of art to the entire community. implementation detail for prior land use policies and plans enacted by the City Council including the following CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO’S policy documents: GENERAL PLAN 2035 The WDAIP promotes the goals and implements the General Plan 2035 (adopted in 2016) policies included throughout the City’s General Plan. Washington Realized (approved in 2015) This includes polices in the Mobility Element, Urban Parks and Open Space Master Plan (adopted in 2019) Structure & Design Element, and Parks & Recreation features make streets, pathways, entries, and intersections Public Art Strategy Resolution 07-31 (adopted in Element that reflect the City’s to commitment to attractive and inviting, and encourage safe, multi-modal 2007) thoughtfully planned public spaces. In the Washington activities consistent with the General Plan’s mobility National Endowment for the Arts “River Crossing” District, these are sidewalks, trails, parks, and open policies. Project (commenced in 2015) spaces, where public art reinforces circulation for City of Sacramento’s Central City Specific Plan wayfinding. Consistent with the General Plan, the The General Plan identifies design strategies that should (adopted in 2018) WDAIP creates riverfront destination points for be incorporated into improvement projects to improve Washington District Specific Plan Update (under pedestrian, transit, and bicycle travelers and integrates the perception of safety in public spaces. This includes development) recreation and public art improvements as essential design principles often summarized under the heading, Grand Gateway Master Plan (approved in 2013) features for walkability, placemaking, security, and “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design” City of West Sacramento’s current public art shaping identity for the District. (CPTED), relevant to lighting, accesses points, visibility, collection and placemaking efforts in the Washington and maintenance, which are consistent with goals and District Public art in the Washington District provides visual design principles from Washington Realized
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX a Transportation Study
    APPENDIX A Transportation Study Submitted by: 2990 Lava Ridge Court Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 DRAFT OCTOBER 2011 Chapter 4|THE PLAN Exhibit 4-1. Preferred Alternative Plan Prepared for: Old Sacramento State Historic Park General Plan and EIR | Page 4-5 Final Transportation Study for the Old Sacramento State Historic Park and California State Railroad Museum General Plan December 2011 RS10-2810 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................. 1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................... 3 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Standards of Significance ........................................................................................................................... 4 Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 6 2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 9 Project Area Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEI Report Template Feb2009 and Msword 2007
    Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District July 2017 Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814-2922 Contact: Name: Melissa Montag Title: Senior Environmental Manager Phone: 916-557-7907 Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 (916) 631-4500 Contact: Barry Scott, RPA Senior Archaeologist (916) 213.2767 July 17, 2017 Barry Scott, MA, RPA Senior Archaeologist Project No. 1602400 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary and Content of Document .................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Description of the Undertaking ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Application of the Historic Properties Management Plan .......................... 1-1 1.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Description of the Undertaking .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j390d9 No online items Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Sean Heyliger Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 1 Planning Department records Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Collection number: CTY0008 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Sean Heyliger Date Completed: 2019-08-19 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Dates: 1955-2008 Bulk Dates: 1976-1996 Collection number: CTY0008 Creator: Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department Collection Size: 16 boxes(16 linear feet) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department records consist of 16 boxes of Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted mostly between 1976-1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation desingation and a photograph of the structure. Physical location: 7H1, 7H2, 7I1 Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research use. Publication Rights All requests to publish or quote from private collections held by the Center for Sacramento History (CSH) must be submitted in writing to [email protected]. Permission for publication is given on behalf of CSH as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the patron.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project
    Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 July 16, 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 Contact: Jennifer Parson Senior Environmental Planner Prepared by: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Suzanne Enslow Project Manager 18010209.01 July 16, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... vi 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Requiring Environmental Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Intended Uses of this Draft EIR ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of this Draft EIR ................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Agency Roles and Responsibilities
    [Show full text]
  • Item 20, July 24, 1986
    MINUTE ITEM This Calel'!dar Item No. ~ 0 w:-s acorc·... ;d as f':!inute Item No. a:o b·: t:~~ S . .:re Lands Co·nmiss!.:·n· :y c vote 9J--L to 0 c:t its ~/;z.,.. h:tL: m..:~ting. CALENDAR ITEM 20 A 10 07 /24./86 . w 20936 PRC 7001 s 6 A. Scott Hadly APPROVAL OF A 49-YEAR PUBLIC AGENCY ~~ASE APPLICANT: City of Sacramento Attn: "Doc" Wisham City Hall 91S "I" Street Sacramento, California 95814 BACKGROUND: The City of Sacramento has during the past years been in the process of developing "Old Sacra~ento" as a historically correct recreation of the area as it appeared in the early 1850's. As part of this process, the City has proposed the development of the waterfront in a manner that would depict the riuer front as it was in the same-time frame as the "Old Sacramento" development. lhe City has begun the construction of the necessary improvements along the river such as docks, piers, buildings and floating vessels which are historically correct in their placement and outward appearance. These improvements ~ill be used for commercial income producing ~ctivities as well as other non-income generating public uses. lbe City has funded the construction of the necessary public facilities and some of the access structures leading to private developments located on the ,river. Funding for this construction has been through the City's Redevelopment Agency and construction has occurred over the past several years. The first major commercial development the "Delta King" is to be located on the waterfront before the end of this year.
    [Show full text]
  • David L. Joslyn Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cr618s No online items Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the David L. Joslyn MS0056 1 papers Guide to the David L. Joslyn papers Collection number: MS0056 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Julie Dominguez and Judith Ann Lewinski Date Completed: 1979 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: David L. Joslyn papers Dates: circa 1850-1963 Bulk Dates: 1875-1948 Collection number: MS0056 Creator: Joslyn, David L. Collection Size: 2.5 linear feet(2 boxes) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The David L. Joslyn papers consist of photographs and manuscripts mostly documenting Joslyn's work as a photographer and his early memories of living in Sacramento, California. Most of the photographs were taken by David Joslyn during the 1920's while he was an employee of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Therefore, many of the photos deal with the Southern Pacific and Central Pacific Railroad Lines. Some of the photographs are copied from earlier photos, drawings and lithographs. Joslyn also took numerous photographs of the State Capitol and the surrounding park as well as many shots from rooftops around the area of downtown Sacramento. These photographs are invaluable when searching for specific locations or businesses in early 20th century Sacramento.
    [Show full text]
  • Stitching a River Culture: Trade, Communication and Transportation to 1960
    Stitching a River Culture: Trade, Communication and Transportation to 1960 W. R. Swagerty and Reuben W. Smith, University of the Pacific Swagerty & Smith 1 Stitching a River Culture: Communication, Trade and Transportation to 1960 An essay by William R. Swagerty & Reuben W. Smith The Delta Narratives Project Delta Protection Commission, State of California June 1, 2015 California’s Delta California’s Delta is a unique environment, created by the natural drainage of the state’s Sierra Nevada range into the Central Valley, which in turn delivers the runoff of rain and snowmelt into river basins that meander and spill into sloughs, bays, and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. According to environmental historian Philip Garone, “Rising sea levels between six thousand and seven thousand years ago impeded the flow of the lower reaches of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, creating a labyrinthine network of hundreds of miles of sloughs surrounding nearly one hundred low-lying islands—the historic Delta.”1 Today, the original 738,000 acres of the Delta are among the most engineered lands in the state; and yet, they still have environmental, social, and economic attributes that merit recognition and protection. By the State of California Delta Protection Commission’s own introductory definition: The Primary Zone of the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta (Delta) includes approximately 500,000 acres of waterways, levees and farmed lands extending over portions of five counties: Solano, Yolo, Sacramento, San Joaquin and Contra Costa. The rich peat soil in the central Delta and the mineral soils in the higher elevations support a strong agricultural economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Narratives-Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of The
    Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta A Report to the Delta Protection Commission Prepared by the Center for California Studies California State University, Sacramento August 1, 2015 Project Team Steve Boilard, CSU Sacramento, Project Director Robert Benedetti, CSU Sacramento, Co-Director Margit Aramburu, University of the Pacific, Co-Director Gregg Camfield, UC Merced Philip Garone, CSU Stanislaus Jennifer Helzer, CSU Stanislaus Reuben Smith, University of the Pacific William Swagerty, University of the Pacific Marcia Eymann, Center for Sacramento History Tod Ruhstaller, The Haggin Museum David Stuart, San Joaquin County Historical Museum Leigh Johnsen, San Joaquin County Historical Museum Dylan McDonald, Center for Sacramento History Michael Wurtz, University of the Pacific Blake Roberts, Delta Protection Commission Margo Lentz-Meyer, Capitol Campus Public History Program, CSU Sacramento Those wishing to cite this report should use the following format: Delta Protection Commission, Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, prepared by the Center for California Studies, California State University, Sacramento (West Sacramento: Delta Protection Commission, 2015). Those wishing to cite the scholarly essays in the appendix should adopt the following format: Author, "Title of Essay", in Delta Protection Commission, Delta Narratives: Saving the Historical and Cultural Heritage of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, prepared by the Center for California Studies, California State University, Sacramento (West Sacramento: Delta Protection Commission, 2015), appropriate page or pages. Cover Photo: Sign installed by Discover the Delta; art by Marty Stanley; Photo taken by Philip Garone.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Profile 2 Area Profile
    AREA PROFILE 2 AREA PROFILE 2.1 OVERVIEW This chapter profiles existing conditions within the Washington District. It describes the regional, city, and local context, along with a history of the area. Existing demographics and site information are also provided, along with a discussion of future opportunities and pending/approved projects. View of the Sacramento River and Downtown Sacramento from the Washington District 2-2 | Washington Specific Plan | City of West Sacramento AREA PROFILE 2.2 REGIONAL & LOCAL CONTEXT West Sacramento lies in eastern Yolo County across the Sacramento River from Downtown Sacramento. The city is bounded by the river on the east and the Yolo Bypass on the west. Other Yolo County communities are to the west and northwest (e.g., Davis, Woodland), Sutter County is to the north, and Placer County is to the northeast. The Specific Plan area lies in the northeast part of West Sacramento. The Washington District is located near Interstate 80, which runs through the northwestern part of the city, and Highway 50/Business 80, which bisects the city, running east-west. Interstate 5 runs north-south through the City of Sacramento just across the river. Figure 2-1 shows the Specific Plan area within a broader regional context. Figure 2-1: Regional Context Washington Specific Plan | City of West Sacramento | 2-3 AREA PROFILE 2.3 AREA & NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT 2.3.1 JOINT RIVERFRONT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT The Washington District is one of several communities planned up and down the Sacramento River in both West Sacramento and Sacramento (see Figure 2-2). The Washington District is similar to Old Sacramento, which is directly to the east in Sacramento, in that both are established historic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Report
    A ULI Rose Center Report Connecting the Depot District Sacramento, California October 10-12, 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………....2 Project Background…………………………………………………………………………………………4 Progress and Challenges……………………………………………………………………………………7 Assessing New Opportunities for Connectivity…………………………………………………………….10 Infrastructure and Development Frameworks……………………………………………………………...13 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………18 All photos and images: Urban Land Institute © 2012 by the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 1500 West Washington, DC 20007-5201 All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copyright holder is permitted. 1 Executive Summary The City of Sacramento and its partners should pursue replacing the I Street Bridge over the Sacramento River, investigate the removal of I Street’s I-5 northbound entrance ramp, and take a number of relatively low-cost, short-term actions to both improve access to its intermodal transportation hub and to attract transit-supportive development in the Depot District of the Sacramento Railyards, according to a panel of experts assembled by the Urban Land Institute’s Rose Center for Public Leadership who visited the site from October 10-12, 2012. Figure 1: The Depot District (orange) in relation to the entire Sacramento Railyards site In their advice to the City on how to enhance access to the Depot District—some developable 17 acres in the southwest portion of the 240-acre Railyards redevelopment site (see Figure 1, above)—the Rose Center’s urban planning, development, and transportation experts stressed the need to immediately improve the pedestrian environment around the new Sacramento Valley Station and its associated transportation services, as well to inform the public about the Railyards’ history, infrastructure projects happening on the site, and the vision for the Railyards’ future.
    [Show full text]