DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department Records http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j390d9 No online items Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Sean Heyliger Center for Sacramento History 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Phone: (916) 808-7072 Fax: (916) 264-7582 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.centerforsacramentohistory.org/ © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 1 Planning Department records Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Collection number: CTY0008 Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, CA Processed by: Sean Heyliger Date Completed: 2019-08-19 Encoded by: Sean Heyliger © 2013 Center for Sacramento History. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records Dates: 1955-2008 Bulk Dates: 1976-1996 Collection number: CTY0008 Creator: Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department Collection Size: 16 boxes(16 linear feet) Repository: Center for Sacramento History Sacramento, California 95811-0229 Abstract: The Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department records consist of 16 boxes of Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted mostly between 1976-1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation desingation and a photograph of the structure. Physical location: 7H1, 7H2, 7I1 Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research use. Publication Rights All requests to publish or quote from private collections held by the Center for Sacramento History (CSH) must be submitted in writing to [email protected]. Permission for publication is given on behalf of CSH as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the patron. No permission is necessary to publish or quote from public records. Preferred Citation [Identification of item and/or item number], [box and folder number], Sacramento (Calif.) Planning Department records, CTY0008, Center for Sacramento History. Acquisition Information Records were transferred to the Center for Sacramento History by the Community Development department in December 2015 (accession 2015/043). Processing Information Collection inventory and finding aid created by Sean Heyliger, 2019-08-19. Scope and Content of Collection The Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department records consist of 16 boxes of Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted mostly between 1976-1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation desingation and a photograph of the structure. The surveys were conducted at the request of the Sacramento City Planning Commission after its creation in 1974 to study the Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 2 Planning Department records historic preservation needs of the city. A Historic Structures Advisory Committee was appointed by the Sacramento City Council whose task was to oversee a survey of historic and culturally significant buildings within the city's downtown area built prior to 1920. The survey area was limited to Old Sacramento bounded by the Southern Pacific Mainline Railroad levee on the north, Broadway to the south, the Sacramento River to the west, and Alhambra boulevard to the east. The residential building survey was initiated in 1975 as the next step following the Historical Structures Advisory Committee's August 1974 report, "Sacramento Old City, a preservation program." The survey was conducted by the San Francisco urban and environment planning firm Charles Hall Page and Associates and established a list of 733 residential properties of pre-1920 residential structures of which 577 were designated on the city's official register as either essential, priority, or contributing structures covered under the city's preservation ordinance. The preservation ordinance allows for the city's preservation board to review any proposed changes or rehabilitation to listed structures and to deny demolition for a period of up to six months with the option for renewal by the Sacramento city council. The city planning department recieved additional funds from the State Office of Historic Preservation in 1979 to perform a non-residential building survey. The survey was conducted by the consulting firm Historic Environment Consultants beginning on June 2, 1980 and a final report completed on June 15, 1981. The survey was limited to the same downtown area used by the residential survey and surveyed non-residential buildings built prior to 1942. The survey included churches, schools, public buildings, utilities, parks, fraternal organizations, industrial buildings and warehouses, and office and commerical buildings. Of the 444 buildings surveyed, 242 were listed on the city's official register with 166 designated as priority structures and 76 as essential structures. Arrangement Series 1. Historic building surveys Indexing Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the library's online public access catalog. Sacramento (Calif.). City Planning Department Historic buildings--California--Sacramento Sacramento (Calif.)--Buildings, structures, etc. Sacramento (Calif.)--history Series 1. Historic building surveys Physical Description: 16 boxes Series Scope and Content Summary Sacramento residential and non-residential building surveys conducted by primarily in 1976 and 1996. Each survey consists of a historical/architectural survey form which includes information about the structure such as building type, architect, builder, date of construction, style, significant architectural features, additions/alterations, evaluation and a photograph of the structure. Arrangement Files are arranged by address, first the numbered streets 1-48th street then the letter streets A-Z, and assorted. Subseries 1.1 2nd street - 10th street Box 1 1006 2nd street, B.F Hastings building / Pony Express terminal 1974 Box 1 1801 2nd street 1980-1994 Box 1 1701 3rd street [CalPers headquarters expansion master plan] 2000-2001 Box 1 1723 3rd street 1994 Box 1 1913 3rd street 1975-1976 Box 1 1921 3rd street undated Box 1 2131 3rd street 1981 Box 1 3rd street and Broadway, Setzer property 2006 Box 1 3414 4th avenue 1990-1991 Box 1 4322 4th avenue, Dunlap Dining Room 1990-2002 Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 3 Planning Department records Series 1. Historic building surveys Subseries 1.1 2nd street - 10th street Box 1 1000 4th street 1978-1996 Box 1 1006 4th street, Citizens Saving and Loan Association 1980 Box 1 1700 4th street undated Box 1 1906-08 4th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1911 4th street 1976 Box 1 1915 4th street 1976 Box 1 1916 4th street 1976 Box 1 1917 4th street 1976 Box 1 1919 4th street 1976 Box 1 1922 4th street 1976-1996 Box 1 1930 4th street 1976-1996 Box 1 2001 4th street 1976 Box 1 2011 4th street 1976-1996 Box 1 2015 4th street 1980 Box 1 2024 4th street 1976-1981 Box 1 2030 4th street 1976-1996 Box 1 2112 4th street undated Box 1 1919 5th street 1976-1994 Box 1 1921-1923 5th street 1976 Box 1 2117 5th street 1979 Box 1 2200 5th street 1980 Box 1 731 6th street, Station A 1981-1996 Box 1 813 6th street, City police station 1977-2000 Box 1 1901 6th street 1976-1996 Box 1 1915 6th street 1980-1996 Box 1 2006 6th street undated Box 1 2104 6th street 1976-1996 Box 1 424 north 7th street 1967 Box 1 523-525 7th street 1976-1996 Box 1 814 7th street 1981 Box 1 923 7th street 1982-1996 Box 1 1009 7th street, Pioneer Hall 1981-1996 Box 1 1015 7th street, Merchants National Bank 1981-1996 Box 1 1109 7th street 1996 and undated Box 1 1117 7th street 1996 Box 1 1120 7th street 1996 and undated Box 1 1122-1126 7th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1801 7th street undated Box 1 1909 7th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1921 7th street 1996 Box 1 4300 8th avenue 2008 Box 1 400 8th street 1976-1996 Box 1 406 8th street 1976-1996 Box 1 506-508 8th street 1996 Box 1 510-512 8th street 1976-1996 Box 1 511 8th street 1976-1987 Box 1 515 8th street 1976-1996 Box 1 516 8th street 1979-09-11 Box 1 517 8th street, Mesick house 1975-1996 Box 1 518 8th street 1976 Box 1 918-926 8th street undated Box 1 919 8th street 1980-1982 Box 1 1109 8th street 1981-2005 Box 1 1110 8th street undated Box 1 1117-1123 8th street 1981 Box 1 1200 8th street undated Box 1 1225 8th street 1980-1996 Box 1 1720 8th street 1996 and undated Guide to the Sacramento (Calif.) CTY0008 4 Planning Department records Series 1. Historic building surveys Subseries 1.1 2nd street - 10th street Box 1 8th and R street, SMUD Station D 1981 Box 1 2115 8th street 1996 and undated Box 1 2131 8th street 1995-1996 Box 1 515 9th street 1976-1996 Box 1 609 9th street undated Box 1 615 9th street 1978 and undated Box 1 711 9th street 1996 Box 1 910 9th street, World Theater 1978 Box 1 922 9th street 1980 Box 1 1009-1011 9th street 1996 and undated Box 1 1015 9th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1017-1031 (1025) 9th street, International Organization of Odd Fellows Temple 1981-1996 Box 1 1107 9th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1117-1131 9th street 1981-1996 Box 1 1220 9th street 1981-1996 Box 1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX a Transportation Study
    APPENDIX A Transportation Study Submitted by: 2990 Lava Ridge Court Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 DRAFT OCTOBER 2011 Chapter 4|THE PLAN Exhibit 4-1. Preferred Alternative Plan Prepared for: Old Sacramento State Historic Park General Plan and EIR | Page 4-5 Final Transportation Study for the Old Sacramento State Historic Park and California State Railroad Museum General Plan December 2011 RS10-2810 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................. 1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Intersections .................................................................................................................................... 3 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Standards of Significance ........................................................................................................................... 4 Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 6 2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 9 Project Area Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources
    Chapter 7—Cultural, Paleontological, and Tribal Cultural Resources 7.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing conditions (environmental and regulatory) and assesses the potential cultural, paleontological, and tribal resources impacts of the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (proposed MTP/SCS). Where necessary and feasible, mitigation measures are identified to reduce these impacts. The information presented in this chapter is based on review of existing and available information and is regional in scope. Data, analysis, and findings provided in this chapter were considered and prepared at a programmatic level. For consistency with the 2016 MTP/SCS EIR, paleontological resources are addressed in this chapter even though these resources are grouped with geology and soils in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (SACOG 2016). Impacts to unique geologic features are addressed in Chapter 9 – Geology, Soils, Seismicity, and Mineral Resources. Cultural resources include archaeological sites or districts of prehistoric or historic origin, built environment resources older than 50 years (e.g., historic buildings, structures, features, objects, districts, and landscapes), and traditional or ethnographic resources, including tribal cultural resources, which are a separate category of cultural resources under CEQA. Paleontological resources include mineralized, partially mineralized, or unmineralized bones and teeth, soft tissues, shells, wood, leaf impressions, footprints, burrows, and microscopic remains that are more than 5,000 years old and occur mainly in Pleistocene or older sedimentary rock units. In response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP), SACOG received comments related to cultural and tribal cultural resources from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency Records
    This thesis/project/dissertation has been reviewed for 508 compliance. To request enhancements, please email [email protected]. THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Jason Partida FALL 2018 © 2018 Jason Partida ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s A Project by Jason Partida Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Lee Simpson, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Dylan McDonald ____________________________ Date iii Student: Jason Partida I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Anne Lindsay, Ph.D. Date Department of Public History iv Abstract of THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECORDS: DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SACRAMENTO, 1960s TO 1990s by Jason Partida The practice of urban renewal in Sacramento has a long history, with the first signs of urban redevelopment taking place after natural disasters afflicted the city. Like the rest of the nation, urban renewal took center stage as a response to the spread of blight in cities. This thesis project explores the work of the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, particularly in the second half of the twentieth-century. The work undertaken by the agency, reflects the city’s demand in preserving and redeveloping their West End and the downtown district.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program
    - 2021-2024 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program SACOG MISSION BOARD MEMBERS AND MEMBER JURISDICTIONS Provide leadership and a Karm Bains, Sutter County dynamic, collaborative public Krista Bernasconi, City of Roseville forum for achieving an efficient regional transportation system, Gary Bradford, Yuba County innovative and integrated Chris Branscum, City of Marysville regional planning, and high quality of life within the greater Pamela Bulahan, City of Isleton Sacramento region. Trinity Burruss, City of Colfax Jan Clark-Crets, Town of Loomis Rich Desmond, Sacramento County Lucas Frerichs, City of Davis Sue Frost, Sacramento County Jill Gayaldo, City of Rocklin Lakhvir Ghag, City of Live Oak Bonnie Gore, Placer County Martha Guerrero, City of West Sacramento Shon Harris, City of Yuba City Rick Jennings, City of Sacramento Paul Joiner, City of Lincoln Patrick Kennedy, Sacramento County Mike Kozlowski, City of Folsom Rich Lozano, City of Galt Porsche Middleton, City of Citrus Heights Pierre Neu, City of Winters David Sander, City of Rancho Cordova Michael Saragosa, City of Placerville Don Saylor, Yolo County Jay Schenirer, City of Sacramento Matt Spokely, City of Auburn Tom Stallard, City of Woodland Darren Suen, City of Elk Grove Wendy Thomas, El Dorado County Rick West, City of Wheatland Amarjeet Benipal, Ex-Officio Member 2021-2024 MTIP Contents A Guide to the Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Contents Page Number Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEI Report Template Feb2009 and Msword 2007
    Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District July 2017 Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists Final American River Common Features Project General Reevaluation Report Historic Properties Management Plan Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, CA 95814-2922 Contact: Name: Melissa Montag Title: Senior Environmental Manager Phone: 916-557-7907 Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 (916) 631-4500 Contact: Barry Scott, RPA Senior Archaeologist (916) 213.2767 July 17, 2017 Barry Scott, MA, RPA Senior Archaeologist Project No. 1602400 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary and Content of Document .................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Description of the Undertaking ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Application of the Historic Properties Management Plan .......................... 1-1 1.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Description of the Undertaking .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Name___6. Representation In
    RECEIVED FHR-&-300 (11-78) AUG 2 7 1982 United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name_______________ historic Blue Anchor Building (California Fruit Exchange) and/or common Same 2. Location street & number 1400 Tenth Stj not for publication city, town Sacramento 'v "vicinity of congressional district 3rd state California code 06 county Sacramento code 067 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public X occupied agriculture museum _Ji_ building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted x government scientific being considered JL_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation x N/A no military other? 4. Owner of Property name State of California, Department of General Services street & number 915 Capitol Mall vicinity of state California 95314 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. County Recorder' S Of f i ce street & number 901 "G" Street city, town Sacramento state California 95814 6. Representation in Existing Surveys City of Sacramento title Historic Resources Inventory has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1981 federal state county local depository for survey records Sacramento City Planning Department, 915 I Street city, town Sacramento state California 95814 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent • deteriorated unaltered x original site aood ruins _JL_ altered * moved date N/A fair unexposed * interior Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Blue Anchor Building is an "L" shaped, two story structure constructed of steel and concrete, finished in stucco, and capped by a low-pitched red tile roof.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Art Implementation Budget
    CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO WASHINGTON DISTRICT PUBLIC ART IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 5 SECTION 1 . BACKGROUND . 9 SECTION 2 . PROPOSED ART CONCEPTS . 25 SECTION 3 . IMPLEMENTATION . 69 APPENDICES . 79 APPENDIX A: PRELIMINARY ENGAGEMENT AND SURVEY SUMMARY APPENDIX B: COLLECTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY intentions for art investments, the WDPAIP will expand PURPOSE opportunities to integrate art into the planning, funding, Public art helps to support a vibrant urban riverfront. and design of capital improvement projects and new It encourages pedestrian, scooter, and bicycle travel private investment. The WDPAIP builds upon the by adding visual interest and wayfinding to the public interaction between the development and redevelopment streetscape and enriching the pedestrian and bicycling of new housing and commercial projects with walkability, experience. Public art is a driver of local economic transportation pathways and nodes, iconic architecture, development and has the potential to catalyze and foster the River Walk, and historical landmarks. Anselm Keifer Sculpture, London community identity. The Washington District Public Art Implementation Plan (WDPAIP) defines a distinct art POLICY CONTEXT West Sacramento, and the Crocker Art Museum, to create investment strategy to foster transit-oriented, pedestrian- a comprehensive plan for public art and arts experiences A primary impetus for the plan is Washington Realized, and bike-friendly development patterns. This Plan connecting both cities with pedestrian-friendly pathways. A Sustainable Community Strategy, which was adopted in provides guidance the City will use to develop public 2015 as a framework for updating the 1996 Washington artworks that highlight the Riverfront, gateway corridors, District Specific Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project
    Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 July 16, 2019 Draft Environmental Impact Report Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project SCH#2019039120 Prepared for: California Department of General Services 707 3rd Street, MS-509 West Sacramento, CA 95605 Contact: Jennifer Parson Senior Environmental Planner Prepared by: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Suzanne Enslow Project Manager 18010209.01 July 16, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... vi 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Requiring Environmental Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Intended Uses of this Draft EIR ....................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Scope of this Draft EIR ................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Agency Roles and Responsibilities
    [Show full text]
  • Item 20, July 24, 1986
    MINUTE ITEM This Calel'!dar Item No. ~ 0 w:-s acorc·... ;d as f':!inute Item No. a:o b·: t:~~ S . .:re Lands Co·nmiss!.:·n· :y c vote 9J--L to 0 c:t its ~/;z.,.. h:tL: m..:~ting. CALENDAR ITEM 20 A 10 07 /24./86 . w 20936 PRC 7001 s 6 A. Scott Hadly APPROVAL OF A 49-YEAR PUBLIC AGENCY ~~ASE APPLICANT: City of Sacramento Attn: "Doc" Wisham City Hall 91S "I" Street Sacramento, California 95814 BACKGROUND: The City of Sacramento has during the past years been in the process of developing "Old Sacra~ento" as a historically correct recreation of the area as it appeared in the early 1850's. As part of this process, the City has proposed the development of the waterfront in a manner that would depict the riuer front as it was in the same-time frame as the "Old Sacramento" development. lhe City has begun the construction of the necessary improvements along the river such as docks, piers, buildings and floating vessels which are historically correct in their placement and outward appearance. These improvements ~ill be used for commercial income producing ~ctivities as well as other non-income generating public uses. lbe City has funded the construction of the necessary public facilities and some of the access structures leading to private developments located on the ,river. Funding for this construction has been through the City's Redevelopment Agency and construction has occurred over the past several years. The first major commercial development the "Delta King" is to be located on the waterfront before the end of this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix Sacramento City Unified School District Central Kitchen Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (Mnd)
    TECHNICAL APPENDIX SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL KITCHEN PROJECT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 5735 47th Avenue Sacramento, CA 95824 January 2, 2019 SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL KITCHEN PROJECT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) TECHNICAL APPENDIX Prepared for: SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 5735 47th Avenue Sacramento, CA 95824 Prepared by: Planning Dynamics Group (PDG) In association with: Saxelby Acoustics, Noise Consultants Environmental Permitting Specialists, Air Quality Consultants K.D. Anderson, Transportation Consultants ESA Consultants for Historic and Cultural Assessment January 2, 2019 APPENDIX A: Air Quality Technical Memorandum APPENDIX B: Historic Resources Evaluation Report APPENDIX C: Noise Assessment Technical Report APPENDIX D: Transportation Technical Memorandum APPENDIX A: Air Quality Technical Memorandum TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Trish Davey Date: December 06, 2018 Planning Dynamics Group From: Ray Kapahi RK Environmental Permitting Specialists Tel: 916-687-8352 E-Mail: [email protected] Subject: Summary of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts from Proposed Central Kitchen Project, Sacramento City Unified School District INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum presents a summary of air quality impacts associated with the proposed Central Kitchen Project. The project is located at 3101 Redding Avenue in Sacramento. Figures 1 and 2 depict the general project location and the project site map. The proposed project consolidates and streamlines the cooking that currently takes place at individual schools. By shifting the cooking to a centralized location, there is substantial reduction in energy usage as the Central Kitchen would employ modern, energy efficient appliances. These replace the older cooking appliances currently being used. The project would not lead to not any increase in the number of meals that would be prepared or the amount of solid waste that would be produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ...................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 .......................................................................... A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ....................................................................... A-13 A.1.3 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-19 A.2 Project Meetings ................................................................................................................ A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ......................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Project Meeting Sign-In Sheets, September 2013 ............................................................... A-59 A.2.3 Comments from the Project Meeting ................................................................................... A-65 A.3 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-71 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, November 21, 2013 ......................................................... A-73 A.3.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter .......................................................
    [Show full text]