DOCSLIB.ORG

Press Conference Mineral and Raw Material Base Development. Gas Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Press Conference Mineral and Raw Material Base Development. Gas Production Press Conference Mineral and Raw Material Base Development. Gas Production. Gas Transmission System Development May 19, 2015 MODERATOR: Good morning, colleagues. Our meeting today is dedicated to Gazprom’s production business. We will talk about the mineral and raw material base, gas production and gas transmission system development. Participants: — Vitaly Markelov, Deputy Chairman of the Management Committee (in charge of the production block); — Oleg Aksyutin, Member of the Management Committee, Department Head (Gas Transportation and Underground Storage); — Dmitry Lyugai, Member of the Management Committee, Department Head (Prospective Development); — Sergey Prozorov, Member of the Management Committee, Department Head (Organization and Management of Industrial Facilities Construction); — Vsevolod Cherepanov, Member of the Management Committee, Department Head (Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production). We are ready to move on to your questions right away. QUESTION: Anastasia Goreva, Argus Media. I have several questions on production and transportation. What is the maximum daily gas production rate at the Bovanenkovskoye field at present? What do you expect it to be by the heating season? Are you going to boost it? And how? What is the annual capacity of the Bovanenkovo – Ukhta gas trunkline system? I know its production potential is about 90 billion cubic meters of gas per year, but what transmission capacity does it have? As for TurkStream, what about pipes procured for South Stream? Are you going to use all of them for TurkStream or are there any other options? VITALY MARKELOV: Last year Gazprom’s production potential reached some 1.648 billion cubic meters of gas daily. This year it will be about 1.5 billion cubic meters of gas daily. We continue building up the Bovanenkovskoye field production capacities, as it is our primary resource base. We are boosting production from this field; in 2015 we expect it to reach 48 billion cubic meters of gas. But we actually hope to get 51 billion cubic meters of gas this year. In addition, I think we’ll manage to produce 218 million cubic meters daily from the Bovanenkovskoye field by the fourth quarter of 2015. We will also develop the Bovanenkovo – Ukhta transmission capacities. ANASTASIA GOREVA: What is the annual capacity of Bovanenkovo – Ukhta? VITALY MARKELOV: 218 million cubic meters daily, that is over 70 billion cubic meters of gas annually. Here we mean the maximum daily gas production rate in the winter period – around 218 million cubic meters of gas daily. As for South Stream, Mr. Aksyutin will tell you about the pipes. OLEG AKSYUTIN: The pipes procured for the South Stream project will be fully used in the TurkStream project. ANASTASIA GOREVA: Are they already in store or yet to be manufactured? 1 OLEG AKSYUTIN: The majority of the pipes have already been manufactured; presently they are kept at special storage yards. VITALY MARKELOV: They are still being worked on – welded into sections and prepared for the construction of TurkStream, namely its offshore section. QUESTION: Sofia Dvornik, Rossiya Segodnya agency. I have two questions. The first one is about your 2015 production plans. For some reason you haven’t included this forecast into your presentation. My second question concerns your plans for the shelf development – not across Gazprom Group as a whole but in Gazprom in particular. VSEVOLOD CHEREPANOV: Our gas production plan stipulated producing 485.6 billion cubic meters. We have already adjusted it by 16 billion cubic meters after the first quarter. We expect it to amount to some 450 billion cubic meters of gas at year-end, which is commensurate with last year’s results. As for our plans for the shelf, we always make big announcements about them. Nothing has changed there. We operate at the Kirinskoye and Yuzhno-Kirinskoye fields (on the shelf of the Sea of Okhotsk). We also carry out seismic surveys in the Sea of Okhotsk as well as at certain prospects in the Barents and Kara Seas. SOFIA DVORNIK: I’m interested in your Arctic shelf development plans. VSEVOLOD CHEREPANOV: We have no drilling plans for the Arctic shelf in 2015. However, there are plans for 3D seismic surveys covering some 10 thousand square kilometers. VITALY MARKELOV: We’re also engaged in exploratory drilling at the Yuzhno-Kirinskoye field. VSEVOLOD CHEREPANOV: That’s right, geological exploration is underway; two wells will be drilled at the Yuzhno-Kirinskoye field. VITALY MARKELOV: I’d like to say a few words about the shelf. Last winter the development of the Kirinskoye field was launched, securing gas supplies to consumers in the Russian Far East. In summer we put the Kirinskoye field on hold because in the summer period we are technologically incapable to offtake gas. That’s why we’ll re-launch it for the 2015–2016 autumn/winter period. Today the Russian Far East receives gas from Sakhalin I and Sakhalin II. QUESTION: Svetlana Savateeva, Interfax agency. Mr. Markelov, you said that Gazprom’s production capacity had dropped to 1.5 billion cubic meters of gas daily. What is the reason for that? As for Gazprom Georesource, what is done by the company itself and what is delegated to subcontractors? I would also like to hear about the new bids for the Power of Siberia gas pipeline construction. One of the subcontractors has already been chosen. Have you distributed contracts for other sections as well? VITALY MARKELOV: Our production potential amounts to some 610 billion cubic meters of gas annually. Speaking of the maximum daily gas production rate, its decrease is caused by a production drop in the Nadym-Pur-Taz region. Last December we launched Gas Facility No. 1 with the annual capacity of 30 billion cubic meters of gas at the Bovanenkovskoye field. For the winter period we made preparations for the maximum daily gas production rate, taking into account the gas output from independent producers. So we ensure gas supplies to consumers in Russia and abroad to the full extent. As for Power of Siberia, we have a contractor for a 208-kilometer stretch; it is Stroytransgaz. The construction of this section from the Chayandinskoye field to Lensk is currently underway. The construction conditions are rather complicated, but about 15 kilometers of the linear section have already been welded. As for the other sections, tender documents are being prepared and will be completed in 2015 in compliance with the schedule. 2 VSEVOLOD CHEREPANOV: As for Gazprom Georesource, it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gazprom, mostly focused on servicing activities including exploratory geophysics, borehole geophysics, well overhaul, diagnostics, equipment manufacturing, and field-specific activities. In general, the contractors’ share in overhaul and diagnostics is about 20 per cent. As for geophysical surveys and well operations, they conduct them using their own resources, meeting 90 per cent of Gazprom’s demand. It is a good service subsidiary: it is very effective and we are satisfied with it. SVETLANA SAVATEEVA: I also have a question on import substitution. It is known that the bulk of Gazprom’s substituted imports accounts for Ukrainian products. Can you say when you plan to completely stop using the products, spare parts and services of Sumy Machine-Building Science-and- Production Association and the Zorya-Mashproekt Gas Turbine Scientific Production Complex? VITALY MARKELOV: We do not purchase Ukrainian equipment under any contracts at present. We supply equipment made by Russian manufacturers only. Speaking of the equipment manufactured at Ukrainian plants, the same is manufactured by Russian companies, including gas compressor units and compressor equipment for gas pumping. Today we have no contracts with Ukrainian companies. As for spare parts, we organized the repairs of Ukrainian gas compressor units at our plant in Tyumen, which is a part of Gazprom Tsentrremont. QUESTION: Mikhail Serov, Vedomosti newspaper. I have two clarification questions. Regarding Power of Siberia, can you already say what the contract price for the construction of the first section is? It was reported it was a framework contract. Could you, perhaps, specify the scope? Speaking about the shelf, a law is currently under discussion as regards providing independent oil producers with access to the shelf. What is the Company’s opinion on this idea? How reasonable do you think it is? VITALY MARKELOV: Regarding the Power of Siberia contracts, you are asking a question that can’t be answered, because this is a confidential matter. As for the shelf, it is a very vulnerable biological environment, especially the Arctic shelf. That is why only companies with experience of working on the shelf should operate there. Gazprom is among the few Russian companies which really work on the shelf today. You know the projects we implement on the shelf of the Sea of Okhotsk. By the way, we employ the most cutting-edge methods of drilling, geological exploration and field development using subsea production facilities. I think we are in the forefront of R&D support for offshore operations right now. As for the Arctic shelf, Gazprom owns a huge fleet for working on the shelf. We have about six platforms we can use. As you know, last year we offloaded the first oil cargo from the Prirazlomnaya platform (Gazprom Neft). Currently Prirazlomnaya is in successful operation. Companies have to be thoroughly prepared to work on the shelf. I think that both Gazprom and our subsidiaries take the matter very seriously. That is why we consider and bring forward proposals for our subsidiary companies to participate. Gazprom is a holding company comprised of production companies, service companies and so on, which, among other things, conduct a broad range of technological operations on the shelf. That’s why we suggest that subsidiary companies take part in offshore operations as well. VSEVOLOD CHEREPANOV: I’d like to give some more details in the context of the said draft law and access expansion for other companies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0001465212.Pdf(1.32
    1 2 Geopolitics of the Russo-Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia Printed 0D\ Published 0D\ Published by.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ .,18 Publisher3UHVLGHQW.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ Editor([WHUQDO&RRSHUDWLRQ7HDP'LYLVLRQRI3ODQQLQJDQG&RRUGLQDWLRQ Registration number1R $SULO AddressUR 6X\XGRQJ *DQJEXNJX6HRXO.RUHD Telephone Fax HomepageKWWSZZZNLQXRUNU Design/Print+\XQGDL$UWFRP ISBN &RS\ULJKW.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ $OO.,18SXEOLFDWLRQVDUHDYDLODEOHIRUSXUFKDVHDWDOOPDMRUERRNVWRUHVLQ.RUHD $OVRDYDLODEOHDWWKH*RYHUQPHQW3ULQWLQJ2IILFH6DOHV&HQWHU 6WRUH 2IILFH The Geopolitics of Russo-Korean Gas Pipeline Project Geopolitics of the Russo- Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia 7KHDQDO\VHVFRPPHQWVDQGRWKHURSLQLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQWKLVPRQRJUDSKDUHWKRVH RIWKHDXWKRUV DQGGRQRWQHFHVVDULO\UHSUHVHQWWKHYLHZVRIWKH.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU 1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ Geopolitics of the Russo- Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia 1. Introduction ···················································································· 8 2. The Geopolitics of Competition and Conflict since the halt of the Russo-Korean Pipeline ························································· 16 A. Chinese proposal for Russo-Sino-Korean gas pipeline cooperation ·· 18 B. Likelihood of changes in Russia’s position ······························ 26 C. Expansion of the Japanese factor ············································ 32 D. Internal conflicts in South Korea and the
    [Show full text]
  • The Pricing Debate Over Russian Gas Exports to China
    The Pricing Debate over Russian Gas Exports to China James Henderson1 NG 56 September 2011 1 Dr. James Henderson has been analysing the Russian oil and gas industry for the past 15 years. Having been Head of Energy for Wood Mackenzie Consultants in the mid-1990s he moved to Moscow as Head of Oil & Gas Research for Renaissance Capital in 1997 and in 1999 became Head of Equity Research. He returned to the UK in 2002 and is currently Head of Russia for Lambert Energy Advisory in London as well as a Senior Visiting Research Fellow at OIES. He completed his doctoral thesis on partnership in the Russian oil and gas industry at the University of London and received his PhD in 2010. i The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2011 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non‐profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978‐1‐907555‐36‐7 ii Preface Russian pipeline gas exports to China have been one of the most anticipated global gas trades since the end of the Cold War. There have been many suggested projects, many meetings of presidents and prime ministers, and many false dawns, but so far agreement has proven elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Altai-Sayan Ecoregion Conservation Strategy
    Altai-Sayan Ecoregion Conservation Strategy FINAL DRAFT VERSION, approved by the Altai-Sayan Steering Committee on 29 June 2012, considering the amendments and comments made during the teleconference of 29 June 2012, as described in the meetings notes of that meeting COLOFON Altai-Sayan Ecoregion Conservation Strategy Full Version © WWF, July 2012 Cover photo: Desert steppe Tuva region (Hartmut Jungius/ WWF-Canon) ii Table of Contents Contribution to WWF Global Conservation Programme .................................................................................................................. 1 Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1- Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2- Outlining the Altai-Sayan Ecoregion ............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS of ALTAI a Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance
    THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance Produced by: Pacific Environment Written by: Jennifer Castner and Pacific Environment Senior Editor and Production Manager: Meerim Kylychbekova Contributors: Chagat Almashev, Matt Foley, Gleb Raygorodetsky, Don Weeden Editors: David Gordon, Leah Zimmerman, Michael Martin Contact: [email protected] Copyright 2009 Cover Photos: Carol Hiltner, World Wildlife Fund, Ashley Tindall (top), Flickrcc/Ilya Schurov (middle), Meerim Kylychbekova (bottom). Design: Design Action Collective THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture 1 THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI Introduction Nestled in the Golden Mountains of Altai in south - health, water quality, critical habitat, and the local ern Siberia, the Republic of Altai is a unique blend tourism-based economy. of ancient cultures, stunning landscapes, and extraordinarily high biodiversity. The republic bor - In this paper, we explore why the Altai is a high- ders Mongolia, China, and Kazakhstan, covering priority conservation area, what threats the region 93,000 square kilometers—an area roughly the size faces today, and where the most significant conser - of the state of Indiana. Sacred sites dot the repub - vation opportunities are located. The paper discusses lic’s varied terrain. Its lands include temperate and specific recommendations to engage in and advance boreal forests, dramatic alpine landscapes, rich agri - these conservation opportunities. It focuses on: cultural lands, the wild and scenic Katun River, and • Strengthening cultural and environmental the remote and fragile Ukok Plateau. activism; The republic’s relative isolation and lack of devel - • Promoting alternative energy and green-building opment mean that its landscape and habitats remain technologies; largely intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Dilemmas About China's Gas Market
    The Northeast Asian Economic Review Vol. 2, No. 2, October 2014 51 Russia’s Dilemmas about China’s Gas Market Elena Shadrina* Abstract ussia has abundant gas resources located in direct proximity to hina and is able to satisfy a significant share of gas demand of the world’s second largest economy. or long, ussia’s attempts to enter hina’s rapidly growing gas market were to no avail. espite the eventual conclusion of a longnegotiated Sinoussian gas contract in ay , some uncertainties about ussiahina gas cooperation persist. The article addresses the hinese gas market principal trends, examines ussia’s current position as hina’s supplier and scrutinises ussia’s hinabound gas export potential. The article explores whether ussia’s interest to further expand in hina’s gas market can materialise and how ussia needs to act in order to attain this goal. Keywords: China, Russia, natural gas, Power of Siberia gas pipeline Introduction The Ukrainian crisis of 2013-2014 revealed the risks of Russia’s overdependence on European energy demand, making clear that export diversification should be Russia’s rational choice allowing it to alleviate its vulnerability vis--vis European markets. Under the new circumstances of the sanctions initiated by the USA and the EU and supported by Japan and some other countries, Russia turned more orientated towards China, and in May 2014 signed what was dubbed a historic gas deal.1 While the scope of Russo-Chinese gas cooperation is not limited to this large-scale contract and while it is still too early to assess the impact of this newly-struck agreement, it seems worthwhile to examine the overall potential for the bilateral gas cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-Russian Gas and Oil Cooperation: Entering Into a New Era of Strategic Partnership?
    April 2015 Sino-Russian Gas and Oil Cooperation: Entering into a New Era of Strategic Partnership? OIES PAPER: WPM 59 Keun-Wook Paik* The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-029-0 *Keun-Wook Paik is Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. i April 2015 – Sino-Russian Gas and Oil Cooperation Acknowledgements Since the publication of Sino-Russian Oil and Gas Cooperation: The Reality and Implications in August 2012, Sino-Russian energy cooperation has witnessed major breakthroughs during the period 2013–14, and the implications for the coming years will not be small. This paper aims at updating the breakthroughs and analysing the implications. I am hugely privileged to have been able to count on the advice, support, and encouragement of my OIES colleagues. My special thanks go to Bassam Fattouh, Jonathan Stern, and Chris Allsopp for their generosity and patience in commenting on the draft, which has significantly enhanced its quality. I also want to express sincere thanks to Tatiana Mitrova who made very useful comments on the final draft, to Lucy Hornby who gave solid help in restructuring and shortening the first draft, and to Colin Shek who helped update my understanding of the CNPC’s WEP development scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Events
    OO iill && GGaass BBuulllleettiinn ► 05.06.2015 N. Iraqi oil to Turkey reached approx. 18 mb in May Anadolu Agency, 03.06.2015 Oil exports from northern Iraq to Turkey’s Ceyhan port reached 17.9 million barrels in May, the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Kurdish Regional Government announced. According to a statement on the ministry’s website, 577,621 barrels of crude oil were exported to Turkey per day during the month of May. “Of that amount 407,111 barrels were supplied from the Kurdish region, while 170,510 barrels of oil came from Kirkuk,” said the statement. It also said the oil exports were conducted under the supervision of SOMO, the State Organization for Marketing of Oil, which is responsible for marketing Iraq’s oil. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) exported 563,000 barrels of crude oil per day to Turkey’s Ceyhan port or a total for April of 16.9 million barrels of oil. The KRG in Erbil and the central government in Baghdad reached an agreement on Dec. 2 regarding the amount of oil exports and the budget share the KRG would receive from the central government. According to the agreement, the KRG was to export 250,000 barrels of oil per day with the Kirkuk province providing 300,000 barrels per day under the supervision of SOMO. In return, Baghdad was to provide 17 percent of the national budget. There have been numerous disputes between the two sides due to the amount of crude oil being exported and also with the lack of full payments made from the budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom's Investment Program Can Best Be Understood As a Way to Employ the Company's Entrenched Contractors at the Expense of Shareholders
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/24/2021 6:14:07 PM INVESTMENT RESEARCH ^ SBERBANK CIB RUSSIA | OIL AND GAS MAY 2018 Russian Oil and Gas Tickling Giants ■ Lukoil has finally outlined its capital allocation policy simply and clearly. The company will share the majority of its free cash flows with shareholders, either through dividends or buybacks. It will reinvest 80% of its capex in the Russian business, where it enjoys greater competencies. We believe that if the management follows through on its promises, the market will have no cause to demand the current double-digit free cash flow yield from the shares. We reiterate our BUY recommendation. Our $85 target price implies a circa 9.5% free cash flow yield at $65/bbl oil. Lukoil shares present an especially good bargain whenever the market offers them at or below the oil price. ■ Gazprom's investment program can best be understood as a way to employ the company's entrenched contractors at the expense of shareholders. The three major projects that will eat up half of the capex in the next five years - Power of Siberia, Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream - are deeply value-destructive. Moreover, we expect them to be followed by a large-scale revamp of the company's trunk pipeline infrastructure, which is aging fast. Such a project could keep capex elevated indefinitely. We retain our opportunistic BUY recommendation on the hope that a political reshuffle could bring about a reform effort, though we concede the chances are slim. ■ Rosneft has announced it will aim to lower capex and reduce net debt by $8 bln this year, or about 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence
    RIA60 30/08/07 9:34 Page 1 N°60 - August 30 2007 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS KREMLIN c P. 1-2 Politics & Government A new season marked by « low blows » KREMLIN Time seems to have accelerated in Moscow since a few days and the “post Putin” manoeuvres c A new season marked by have gotten off to a flying start even before the end of the vacations. On the side of the media close « low blows » to the Kremlin, the progressive and powerful ascendancy of Sergey Ivanov is being orchestrated, FOCUS to the point that it is in fashion to now consider him as the “successor” in the face of a Dmitry c Sergey Naryshkin Medvedev who has never really been convincing or taken on the profile of a future Russian leader. reinforces his positions But on the sidelines the blows are coming in low. Such as the attempts to gain control of Russ- neft, the 10th petroleum company of the country, controlled by Mikhail Gutseriev, of which we P. 3-7 Business & Networks have often spoken in these columns (Russia Intelligence n°56 of May 31 2007).At the beginning ENERGY of the summer, Oleg Deripaska and Mikhail Gutseriev, constrained and forced, reached an accord c Gazprom’s new targets so that the group Base Element buys Russneft for a little more than 3 billion dollars (or a price BEHIND THE SCENE inferior to all the evaluations, which ranged between 6 and 8 billion), with the approval of Vladimir c Total’s Russian idyll Putin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-06-06 Final Thesis Clean
    NATURAL GAS DIPLOMACY OF RUSSIA WITH THE EU AND TURKEY: POLITICAL AND SECURITY VERSUS ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY KÜR ŞAD TOSUN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE MAY 2016 ABSTRACT NATURAL GAS DIPLOMACY OF RUSSIA WITH THE EU AND TURKEY: POLITICAL AND SECURITY VERSUS ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSIONS Tosun, Kür şad Ph.D., Department of Earth System Science Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Oktay Fırat Tanrısever Co-Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Merih Köksal Aydınalp May 2016, 289 pages Energy relations among Turkey, Russia and the EU are very complex. In terms of natural gas, Russia wishes to secure its strong supplier status on Europe and Turkey, while the EU strives for diversity in gas pipeline routes and supply security. On the other hand, Turkey aims to strengthen its status as a transit country, at least preferably as a ‘hub’, and also seeks for diverse gas supplies. In recent years, Turkey was able to overcome difficult and sensitive political situations with successful maneuvers using its unique geopolitical advantages; and acceded to consent Russia to use its Exclusive Economic Zone in the Black Sea where South Stream Natural Gas Pipeline would cross. However, the EU blocked the South Stream Project and Russia has an intention to divert the route of the project towards Turkey. Moreover, Turkey has succeeded in converting the Turkish Section of the Nabucco Project into the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline Project (TANAP) together with Azerbaijan, to contribute to the energy security and energy supply diversification policy of the EU in order to decrease the dependence on Russia by including Caspian and probably Middle Eastern (Iraq) natural gas reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • 3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S
    3NOV201015291889 Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom U.S.$30,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes to be issued by, but with limited recourse to, Gaz Capital S.A. for the sole purpose of financing loans to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom Under the Programme for the Issuance of Loan Participation Notes described in this Base Prospectus (the ‘‘Programme’’), Gaz Capital S.A. (the ‘‘Issuer’’), subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, may from time to time issue loan participation notes (the ‘‘Notes’’) on the terms set out herein, as completed by a final terms document (each, ‘‘Final Terms’’) or a series prospectus (each, ‘‘Series Prospectus’’) setting out the specific terms of each issue. The aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding will not at any time exceed U.S.$30,000,000,000 (or the equivalent in other currencies). This Base Prospectus supersedes any previous base prospectus, offering circular or supplement thereto relating to the Programme. Any Notes issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Base Prospectus are issued subject to the provisions herein. This Base Prospectus does not affect any Notes issued prior to the date hereof. Notes will be issued in Series (as defined in ‘‘Overview of the Programme’’) and the sole purpose of issuing each Series will be to finance loans (each a ‘‘Loan’’) to Open Joint Stock Company Gazprom (the ‘‘Borrower,’’ ‘‘Gazprom’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) as borrower, on the terms of an amended and restated facility agreement between the Issuer and the Borrower dated December 7, 2005 (the ‘‘Facility Agreement’’), as amended and supplemented by a loan supplement to be entered into in respect of each Loan on each Issue Date (each a ‘‘Loan Supplement’’ and, together with the Facility Agreement, each a ‘‘Loan Agreement’’) between the Issuer and the Borrower.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Milov / Russia’ New Energy Alliances
    ’’IIffrrii _____________________________________________________________________ Russia’s New Energy Alliances: Mythology versus Reality _____________________________________________________________________ Vladimir Milov July 2015 . Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non - governmental and a non - profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. ISBN : 978-2-36567-418-8 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2015 Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27, rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE 1000 – Bruxelles – BELGIQUE Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tél. : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax : +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Website : Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection of articles dedicated to the study of Russia and other former Soviet states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues.
    [Show full text]