DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Gas Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Gas Trade RUSSIAN ENERGY STRATEGY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC IMPLICATIONS FOR AUSTRALIA RUSSIAN ENERGY STRATEGY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC IMPLICATIONS FOR AUSTRALIA EDITED BY ELIZABETH BUCHANAN Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463380 ISBN (online): 9781760463397 WorldCat (print): 1246214161 WorldCat (online): 1246214035 DOI: 10.22459/RESAP.2021 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2021 ANU Press Contents Acronyms . vii Figures . xi Tables . .. xiii Introduction . 1 Elizabeth Buchanan Part 1: An Asia‑Pacific Energy Outlook 1 . Energy Outlook in the Asia‑Pacific . 15 Shoichi Itoh 2 . Russia’s Foray into Asia’s Energy Market . 31 Morena Skalamera Part 2: Russian Foreign Energy Strategy 3 . Russian Grand Strategy and Energy Resources: The Asian Dimension . 57 Jakub M . Godzimirski 4 . Energy and Russian Great Power Post-Crimea . 85 Peter Rutland 5 . Russian Energy Firms in the Eastern Market . 105 Keun-Wook Paik Part 3: Australia’s Asia‑Pacific Energy Interests 6 . Unpacking Australia’s Energy Strategy for the Region . .. 143 John Blackburn 7 . Future of Russian Coal Exports in the Asia‑Pacific . 155 Stephen Fortescue Part 4: Russian Energy Strategy and the Future Ahead 8 . Sanctions and Moscow’s Adaptation Strategy . 183 Maria Shagina 9 . The 2019 Energy Security Doctrine and Debates around It in Russia . 201 Tatiana Romanova Conclusion . 219 Elizabeth Buchanan Contributors . 223 Acronyms ADF Australian Defence Force ANU The Australian National University APC African, Caribbean and Pacific Group APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation APR Asia-Pacific region ASEAN Association of South-East Asian Nations BAM Baikal–Amur Mainline BGG Beijing Gas Group BRI Belt and Road Initiative CAATSA Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act CAGP Central Asian Gas Pipeline CBR Central Bank of Russia CDB China Development Bank CDU Central Dispatching Unit CNOOC China National Offshore Oil Corporation CNPC China National Petroleum Corporation COOEC China Offshore Oil Engineering Company COSCO China Ocean Shipping Company DSME Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering ECT Energy Charter Treaty EIA Energy Information Administration EPC engineering, procurement and construction ESD Energy Security Doctrine ESPO Eastern Siberia – Pacific Ocean vii RUSSIAN ENERGY StrategY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC ETRI Economic and Technology Research Institute EWP Energy White Paper FID financial institutions duty IDF Industrial Development Fund IEA International Energy Agency IEEJ Institute of Energy Economics, Japan IR International relations JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation JOGMEC Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation LNG liquefied natural gas MOL Mitsui OSK Lines NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NDRC National Development and Reform Commission NERA National Energy Resources Australia NESA National Energy Security Assessment NPS new policies scenario NSR Northern Sea Route OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries POS Power of Siberia PRRT Petroleum Resources Rent Tax RDIF Russian Direct Investment Fund RFE Russian Far East RPR Reserves–Production Ratio SOE State-Owned Enterprise SWIFT Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication VGK Vostochnaia gornorudnaia kompaniia viii ACRONYMS Measurement bcf billion cubic feet bcf/d billion cubic feet per day bcm billion cubic metres bcm/y billion cubic metres per year b/d barrels per day km kilometre mb/d million barrels per day mmbtu million metric British thermal units mmt million metric tons (tonnes) mmt/y million metric tons (tonnes) per year mt million tons mtoe million tons of oil equivalent mt/y million tons per year MW megawatt tcm trillion cubic metres tmt thousand metric tons (tonnes) ix Figures Figure 3.1: Russian energy actors on a map of reputational power. Annual rankings of top 100 political figures presented by Nezavisimaya Gazeta (NeGa) between 2007 and 2018 ........65 Figure 3.2: Frequency of term ‘energy’ in Russian doctrines, 2000–18 ..........................................66 Figure 3.3: Russian energy-related doctrines published between 1993 and 2019. .69 Figure 3.4: Share of petroleum revenue in the Russian state budget ..69 Figure 5.1: China’s crude oil imports by country ...............107 Figure 5.2: Russia’s oil and gas export to Asia ..................113 Figure 5.3: Gazprom’s POS 1 and Altai gas to China ............116 Figure 5.4: China’s gas imports by pipeline and LNG ............119 Figure 5.5: Pipeline gas supply options to the Korean Peninsula ....121 Figure 5.6: Chinese LNG and pipeline gas import growth ........123 Figure 5.7: Novatek’s Yamal and Gydan peninsulas’ gas reserves ....126 Figure 5.8: LNG cost breakdown by origin and destination .......127 Figure 5.9: Novatek’s LNG logistics to Asia ...................133 Figure 5.10: LNG transportation costs: East versus West routes ....133 Figure 5.11: LNG transit via Northern Sea Route subject to icebreakers commissioning ..........................134 Figure 6.1: Australian fuel market trends .....................145 Figure 6.2: LNG exporting countries and proved gas reserves ......152 xi Tables Table 3.1: What makes Russia important in energy terms and what makes energy important in the Russian strategic context? ......63 Table 3.2: Instruments and tools in Russian energy strategy ........74 Table 4.1: Key pipeline projects since 2000 ....................88 Table 5.1: China’s crude oil imports, 2000–17 (mt/y) ...........108 Table 5.2: China’s crude oil from Russia and Kazakhstan (mt/y) ....108 Table 5.3: Chayandinskoye and Kovyktinskoye output (bcm/y) ....116 Table 5.4: China’s long-term gas supply demand projection .......124 Table 5.5: LNG cost breakdown by origin and destination (US$/mmbtu) .....................................127 Table 5.6: LNG project competitiveness in US$/mmbtu, high-income market test—Japan, Korea, Taiwan or China (JKC) 2025 (US$/mmbtu). 128 Table 5.7: List of 15 icebreaking LNG carriers .................132 Table 7.1: Forecasts in the Program for the Development of the Coal Industry of Russia for the Period to 2030, with outcome in 2018 (mmt). 156 Table 7.2: Output by selected regions as forecast in the Program for the Development of the Coal Industry of Russia for the Period to 2030, with outcomes in 2013 and 2018 (mmt) ............157 Table 7.3: Exports to the Asia-Pacific from selected regions as forecast in the Program for the Development of the Coal Industry of Russia for the Period to 2030, with outcomes in 2013 and 2018 (mmt). 158 xiii RUSSIAN ENERGY StrategY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC Table 7.4: Output and exports from Sakhalin (mmt) ............161 Table 7.5: Russian coal export destinations, 2018, top five worldwide and other Asian destinations (mmt) ............161 Table 7.6: Output of Urgalugol’, forecast and actual (mmt) .......163 Table 7.7: Distances from coal-producing regions to Shanghai (’000 km). 171 xiv Introduction Elizabeth Buchanan Given Australia’s lack of energy security strategy, it is not surprising that the country is void of institutional knowledge and know-how of Russian foreign energy strategy. The ‘lucky country’ as it were, relies entirely on sea lines of communication to the north to supply fuel and to export Australian coal and natural gas. Australia has entered the 2020s as the world’s largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter; however, maintaining complacency in Canberra’s current export activities will ultimately lead to a long-term security crisis. Australia lacks institutional insight into Russian energy interests in Canberra’s prime energy market—the Asia-Pacific. This book seeks to fill this knowledge gap by providing policymakers, academics and tertiary-level students with up-to-date insight and analysis of Russia’s foreign energy strategy in the region. By comparing and contrasting this to Australia’s energy security over-reliance throughout the Asia-Pacific region (APR), this book highlights serious energy security concerns on the not too distant horizon. The concept of energy security is an age-old challenge for national strategy and, for Daniel Yergin, it consistently elicits ‘new answers’.1 A constantly evolving issue, energy security is shaped by both internal state forces and external international ones. With an array of definitions and priorities, most experts at least agree on the fact that global energy demand is continuing to increase in step with dwindling known supplies of existing energy resources. Put simply, ‘easy access’ to ‘known’ or ‘proven’ energy reserves (namely hydrocarbons—oil and natural gas) is getting harder. Existing wells are dry and explored energy frontiers are in technically challenging and financially prohibitive spaces, such as the 1 Daniel Yergin, ‘Ensuring Energy Security’, Foreign Affairs, March/April 2006, doi.org/10.2307/ 20031912. 1 RUSSIAN ENERGY StrategY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC offshore Arctic Ocean. Some of the ‘new answers’ to this challenge include renewable energy sources and the development of non-traditional energy ventures. While there are various definitions of energy security, common components include: • secure, uninterrupted supply of energy resources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF-Download
    Julian Grinschgl FOKUS | 3/2019 Pipeline Politics, A Single Market, and the Rise of Renewable Energy: Challenges and Pathways for European Energy Security Introduction (CEE) are highly dependent on Russian The Pipeline Legacy gas supplies. Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, At the end of 2018, Gazprom reported Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, The collapse of the Soviet Union meant a record high in natural gas exports to Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Finland that the immense network of pipelines Europe, exceeding 200 billion cubic meters import more than 75% of their gas from linking the Siberian gas fields and Europe (bcm) for the first time.1 As of early January Russia.8 Furthermore, gas was used for as are now crossing numerous countries wit- 2019, the United States (US) ambassa- much as a quarter of total primary energy hout an overarching regulator. This creates dor to Germany threatened to sanction consumption in the EU and by looking at tensions between destination, transit, German companies that will continue broader and more long-term scenarios of and supplier countries due to problems to be engaged in the controversial Nord future energy demands it is expected that of governance because these pipelines Stream 2 (NS2) project, aiming to build the share of natural gas in the EU’s energy can be abused as a political tool. Ukra- another direct pipeline from Russia to mix might even further increase.9 The dec- ine, which has been the transit land for Germany circumventing transit states.2 line of domestic gas production in
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2016, 6(4), 782-788. Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time Tatyana I. Pototskaya1*, Alexander P. Katrovskiy2, Vladimir I. Chasovskiy3 1Department of Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Smolensk State University, Smolensk Oblast, Russia, 2Department of Service and Tourism, Smolensk Humanitarian University, Smolensk, Russia, 3Department of Geography, Land Use and Spatial Planning, Institute of Environmental Management, Territorial Development and Urban Construction, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia. *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article presents the research on transformation of territorial organization of Russian pipeline transport in the post-Soviet time, considering its relations with neighbouring countries. The research identifies general ways of such transformation: The influence of Russia’s desire to escape from the dictate of the transit countries exporting energy; the impact of Russia’s struggle for the transportation of gas and oil extracted in the Caspian Sea basin; the influence of the struggle for the transportation of oil and gas in the Asia-Pacific region. A new database including the main pipelines and sea ports in Russia, revealed correlations in the development of pipeline transport in the post-Soviet period with the development of infrastructure of the country’s sea transport. The article identifies positive changes in the transport infrastructure (construction of Russian alternative pipeline projects), which will reduce the degree of Russian dependence on relations with neighbouring countries, as well as negative changes (construction of alternative Russian pipeline projects).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations
    Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations by Aliaksei Patonia Having ratified the Paris Agreement, the European Union (EU) pledged to substantially lower the level of its carbon emissions and become climate-neutral by 2050. In this respect, hydrogen (H2) – an energy source that could prospectively substitute conventional hydrocarbons – is viewed as an important element in achieving these ambitious targets, as it could revolutionize the energy industry. Here, though the EU puts specific attention to the build-up of H2 generation based on renewables, the cheapest way of its current large-scale production is using natural gas as a feedstock – the fuel imported primarily from Russia. This tradeoff between costs and climate commitments makes the future of the EU-Russia energy relations particularly tricky. EU’s Hydrogen Strategy vs. Russia’s ‘Hydrogen Roadmap’ Since energy production and consumption are the largest sources of CO2 emissions in the EU- 271, meeting the climate targets will necessitate a comprehensive transformation of the energy sector. Nevertheless, the energy industries in most European countries are still extensively reliant on hydrocarbons, in general (Figure 1), and natural gas, in particular, most of which is supplied by Russia. That is why, shifting the European economic paradigm towards sustainability is likely to necessitate the review of the EU-Russia energy relations, since Russia’s little focus on climate policy. 1 EEA (2013) 1 Figure 1: EU energy imports from Russia and energy mix2 Though, within the EU, reaching climate neutrality – i.e. the economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions – is generally viewed through decarbonization (the substitution of fossil fuels by renewables)3, the intermittency of wind and solar power necessitates finding a way to store large volumes of energy for a long time so that they could be integrated into the energy system4.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Oil and Gas Challenges
    Order Code RL33212 Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Updated June 20, 2007 Robert Pirog Specialist in Energy Economics and Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Summary Russia is a major player in world energy markets. It has more proven natural gas reserves than any other country, is among the top ten in proven oil reserves, is the largest exporter of natural gas, the second largest oil exporter, and the third largest energy consumer. Energy exports have been a major driver of Russia’s economic growth over the last five years, as Russian oil production has risen strongly and world oil prices have been very high. This type of growth has made the Russian economy dependent on oil and natural gas exports and vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices. The Russian government has moved to take control of the country’s energy supplies. It broke up the previously large energy company Yukos and acquired its main oil production subsidiary. The Duma voted to give Gazprom, the state- controlled natural gas monopoly the exclusive right to export natural gas; Russia moved to limit participation by foreign companies in oil and gas production and Gazprom gained majority control of the Sakhalin energy projects. Russia has agreed with Germany to supply Germany and, eventually, the UK by building a natural gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, bypassing Ukraine and Poland. In late 2006 and early 2007, Russia cut off and/or threatened to cut off gas or oil supplies going to and/or through Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, and Belarus in the context of price and/or transit negotiations — actions that damaged its reputation as a reliable energy supplier.
    [Show full text]
  • 0001465212.Pdf(1.32
    1 2 Geopolitics of the Russo-Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia Printed 0D\ Published 0D\ Published by.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ .,18 Publisher3UHVLGHQW.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ Editor([WHUQDO&RRSHUDWLRQ7HDP'LYLVLRQRI3ODQQLQJDQG&RRUGLQDWLRQ Registration number1R $SULO AddressUR 6X\XGRQJ *DQJEXNJX6HRXO.RUHD Telephone Fax HomepageKWWSZZZNLQXRUNU Design/Print+\XQGDL$UWFRP ISBN &RS\ULJKW.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ $OO.,18SXEOLFDWLRQVDUHDYDLODEOHIRUSXUFKDVHDWDOOPDMRUERRNVWRUHVLQ.RUHD $OVRDYDLODEOHDWWKH*RYHUQPHQW3ULQWLQJ2IILFH6DOHV&HQWHU 6WRUH 2IILFH The Geopolitics of Russo-Korean Gas Pipeline Project Geopolitics of the Russo- Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia 7KHDQDO\VHVFRPPHQWVDQGRWKHURSLQLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQWKLVPRQRJUDSKDUHWKRVH RIWKHDXWKRUV DQGGRQRWQHFHVVDULO\UHSUHVHQWWKHYLHZVRIWKH.RUHD,QVWLWXWHIRU 1DWLRQDO8QLILFDWLRQ Geopolitics of the Russo- Korean Gas Pipeline Project and Energy Cooperation in Northeast Asia 1. Introduction ···················································································· 8 2. The Geopolitics of Competition and Conflict since the halt of the Russo-Korean Pipeline ························································· 16 A. Chinese proposal for Russo-Sino-Korean gas pipeline cooperation ·· 18 B. Likelihood of changes in Russia’s position ······························ 26 C. Expansion of the Japanese factor ············································ 32 D. Internal conflicts in South Korea and the
    [Show full text]
  • Ekofish Kiest Voor Pon Power En EST-Floattech
    DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2018 – 328 Number 328 *** COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS *** Saturday 24-11-2018 News reports received from readers and Internet News articles copied from various news sites. 2 EGS technicians working back deck onboard the Research Vessel (RV) “Northern Endeavour” off the Kolombangara volcano, 20th November 2018. Both EGS technicians are from Cebu City, Philippines as is many of the crew, and are involved in a large and thus far successful geophysical and geotechnical campaign for fibre optic cable lay 5Distribution : daily to 40.750+ active addresses 24-11-2018 Page 1 DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2018 – 328 Your feedback is important to me so please drop me an email if you have any photos / articles that may be of interest to the maritime interested people at sea and ashore PLEASE SEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE / PHOTOS / ARTICLES TO : [email protected] this above email address is monitored 24/7 PLEASE DONT CLICK ON REPLY AS THE NEWSLETTER IS SENt OUT FROM AN UNMANNED SERVER If you don't like to receive this bulletin anymore : please send an e-mail to the above e- mail adress for prompt action your e-mail adress will be deleted ASAP from the server EVENTS, INCIDENTS & OPERATIONS The splendid MARCO POLO last week in Trondheim, Norway Photo : John Spedding (c) China to build its first cruise liner By : Li Xinran Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co is to build the nation’s first cruise liner following an agreement between parent company China State Shipbuilding Corp, US-based Carnival Corp and Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Update: Frozen 3? Keeping an Eye on Budgeting Process For
    December 5, 2019 Export Infrastructure Michael Webber, CFA Export Infrastructure 646-993-0693 LNG Update: Frozen 3? Keeping An Eye [email protected] Export Infrastructure On Budgeting Process For Arctic 2 Greg Wasikowski, CFA Funding Hot Potato May Be A Drag On Operational Timeline 646-993-0694 [email protected] Who Picks Up The Check For Arctic 2? The timeline for Novatek’s high-profile Arctic Export Infrastructure LNG 2 (19.8mpta) may have hit a modest speedbump, as the ~$1.9BN request to help Chris Tsung, CFA 646-998-8290 finance critical aspects of Arctic 2 [the Utrenneye LNG terminal on Gydan peninsula (page [email protected] 4), and reloading terminals in Murmansk (for European cargoes) and Kamchatka (for Asia cargoes)] are absent from Russia’s 2020 draft budget. While the project has Use already reached a positive FID, and is clearly a national priority – we think it’s worth watching whether any squabble over the ultimate funding source ends up delaying its operational timeline (which is already ambitious). The primary options appeared to be (1) the state budget (absent), or (2) funding from the ~$124B National Wealth Fund, which appears to be a more complicated and competitive process (below). Considering that Arctic 2 is being used as a fulcrum to revitalize/create local content industries - For including the Zvvezda shipyard for the required LNG carriers (Arc-7s or similar - which cost ~$350MM each in Korea) and some local fabrication of key equipment, we ultimately expect continued sovereign support. However, given narrower pricing/economics and (potentially) some budgeting hot-potato, we think its worth watching the Arctic 2 operational timeline.
    [Show full text]
  • GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3Rd Edition
    1 2 GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3rd edition Authors and Contributors Namely in Alphabetical Order Amira Remadna Data Analysis and Research Diana Cueto ICT and Software Support Katrien Hermans Public Relations and Marketing Maria Arteaga Graphic Design & Administrative Support Mohamed Arafat Data Engineering and Curation Mona Shokripour, PhD Data Modelling and Integration Rixio Morales, PhD ICT Solutions Architect and Maintenance Roberto Arenas Lara, PhD Team Leader 3 Disclaimer The GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin (ASB) 2019 is the result of the data gathering collection and processing obtained directly from GECF Member and Observer Countries through the GECF Data Exchange Mechanism and in part using processed data from secondary sources examined and analysed by GECF Secretariat. The data contained in the GECF ASB 2019 are for information purposes only and do not necessary reflect the views of GECF Member and Observer Countries. Neither GECF Secretariat nor any of GECF Member and Observer Countries nor any of their agents or their employees are liable for any errors in or omissions from such information and materials and does not assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy completeness or reasonableness of data. Unless copyrighted by a third party, the information presented in the GECF ASB 2019 may be used and/or reproduced for research educational and other non-commercial purposes without GECF Secretariat’s prior written permission provided, fully acknowledging GECF as the copyright holder. Written permission from GECF Secretariat is required for any commercial use. The GECF ASB 2019 contains references to materials from third parties. GECF Secretariat will not be responsible for any unauthorized use of third party materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4. China and Yamal Lng
    Table of Contents ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………....4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1. RUSSIAN-CHINESE COOPERATION IN OIL BUSINESS .......................... 9 Russian-Chinese Trade: Oil & Oil products ............................................................................................................. 9 Russian-Chinese Contracts: crude oil supply ......................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 2. RUSSIA-CHINA COOPERATION IN COAL BUSINESS ............................ 17 Russian-Chinese Trade: Thermal & Coking coal ................................................................................................... 17 Russian-Chinese Contracts: Coal supply ................................................................................................................ 21 CHAPTER 3. RUSSIA-CHINA COOPERATION IN GAS BUSINESS ............................... 24 CHAPTER 4. CHINA AND YAMAL LNG .............................................................................. 29 CHAPTER 5. CHINESE COMPANIES ENTER SIBUR ....................................................... 32 CHAPTER 6. CHINA'S POLICY TOWARDS THE NORTHERN SEA ROUTE .............. 34 CHAPTER 7. CHINA PARTICIPATES IN OFFSHORE PROJECTS IN RUSSIA ........... 37 CHAPTER 7.1 CHINA’S PARTICIPATION IN OTHER ENERGY PROJECTS IN RUSSIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kyma Ship Performance
    Kyma Ship Performance Reference list January 2020 Kyma a.s Tel: +47 55 53 00 14 Aasamyrane 88B Fax: +47 55 53 00 17 N-5116 Ulset (Bergen) E-mail: [email protected] NORWAY Web: www.kyma.no Page 2 Al Kharsaah Inc Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Al Kharsaah Samsung 1644 LNG Carrier 2006 Al Shamal Inc Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Al Shamal Samsung 1645 LNG Carrier 2007 Albro Navigation Co Inc Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Fiora Topic Namura S401 Bulk Carrier 2015 5720 kW Alkistis SHipping Inc Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Aretea Daewoo H5400 Crude/Oil 2015 11140 kW Almi Tankers Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Almi Globe Daewoo H5356 Crude Oil Tanker 2011 18170 kW Almi Sky Daewoo H5357 Crude Oil Tanker 2012 16260 kW Almi Sun Daewoo H5358 Crude Oil Tanker 2012 16260 kW ALMI EXPLORER Daewoo H5359 Crude Oil Tanker 2012 16260 kW Almi Odyssey Daewoo H5360 Crude Oil Tanker 2012 16260 kW ALMI NAVIGATOR Daewoo H5361 Crude Oil Tanker 2012 16260 kW Almi Voyager Daewoo H5363 Crude Oil Tanker 2013 16260 kW Hercules Voyager Daewoo H5366 Crude Oil Tanker 2013 24380 kW Almi Atlas Hyundai Samho S913 VLCC 2017 26000 kW Almi Titan Hyundai Samho S914 VLCC 2017 Alpha Gas Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Daewoo H2483 2019 2x12590 kW Daewoo H2484 2019 Daewoo H2485 2020 Daewoo H2500 LNG Tanker 2020 2x18200 kW Alpha Tankers Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Energy Atlantic STX Offshore & Shipb S1670 LNG Carrier 2013 23000 kW Alterna Capital Partners LLC Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Stenaweco Marjorie K STX Offshore & Shipb S1573 Product Carrier 2012 7570 kW Stenaweco Julia L STX Offshore & Shipb S1574 Product Carrier 2012 7570 kW Gladys W STX Offshore & Shipb S1575 Product Carrier 2012 7570 kW Ancora Investment Trust Inc Vessel name Yard/hull Type Delivery Power Angelica An Daedong 1032 Tanker 1999 10150 PS Apostolos A Daedong 1033 Tanker 1999 10150 PS Kyma Ship Performance Reference List Printed: 31/01/2020 Page 3 Andriaki Shipping Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologists of Russian Origin in the Francophone Countries
    Tchoumatchenco, P., Durand-Delga, M., Ricour, J. and Wiazemsky, M., 2016. Geologists of Russian origin in the francophone countries. Boletín Geoló- gico y Minero, 127 (2/3): 711-738 ISSN: 0366-0176 Geologists of Russian origin in the francophone countries Platon Tchoumatchenco(1), † Michel Durand-Delga, Jean Ricour(2) and Michel Wiazemsky(3) (1) Geological Institute, Institute “Acad Str. Dimitrov”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad.G. BonchevStr., 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria [email protected] (2) Résidence Valmante F1, 13009 Marseille, France. [email protected] (3) 81 chemin Plan Charles, 74190 Passy, France [email protected] † décédé le 19 août 2012 ABSTRACT Many ethnic Russian geologists have lived and worked in Francophone countries. We describe in this paper the life and career of geologists (i.e. all Earth scientists - geologists, mineralogists, tectonicians, geophysi- cists, geochemists, paleontologists, mining and drilling engineers, hydrogeologists, cosmos - geologists, etc.), regardless of their original nationality (Russians, Ukrainians, Tatars, Germans, etc.) born in the terri- tory of the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union or the Russian Federation. Key words: Russian geologists, Francophone countries, the History of Geology Geólogos de origen ruso en países francófonos RESUMEN Muchos geólogos de etnia rusa han vivido y trabajado en países francófonos. En este trabajo describimos la vida y la carrera de geólogos (esto es, científicos de la Tierra: geólogos, mineralogistas, tectónicistas, geofí- sicos, geoquímicos, paleontólogos, ingenieros de minas y de sondeos, hidrogeólogos, geólogos planeta- rios, etc.) sin tener en cuenta su nacionalidad original (rusos, ucranianos, tártaros, alemanes, etc.) nacidos en el territorio del Imperio Ruso, la Unión Soviética o la Federación Rusa.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Nefte Transport
    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
    [Show full text]