DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C — Rail Needs List, Part 1 and 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C — Rail Needs List, Part 1 and 2 DRADDRPart 1: Oregon FreightFr Rail Needs List Appendix C—RailNeedsList,Part1and2 Line Description of Need / Freight Mobility Issue Secondary Start End Miles Operator Owner Category Segment with the Facility Category Oregon Moody Gateway 899 BNSF BNSF VerticVeVertical clearance in 5 tunnels between the Capacity Safety and Trunk ColumbCoColumbia River and Madras preclude passage of (൶FLHQF\ Subdivision double-stadodouble-stack containers. However, improving these tunnels shoshould be done concurrently with improving verticalertical clearclearances in tunnels on the Gateway Subdivision bebetween Keddie, Calif., and Klamath Falls to achieve uuniform capacity enhancements. Oregon MP 13.4Z Chemult 54.4 BNSFF BNSF Between Bend and MP 13.4Z south of Lava, trains Capacity Trunk south of DUHDXWKRUL]HGE\&HDUHDXWKRUL]HGE\&HQWUDOL]HG7UD൶F&RQWURO Subdivision Lava (CTC)) but from MP 113.4Z to Chemult, 54.4 miles is "dark territory"territo with trains authorized by track warrants. ExtendEExtending CTC through this VHFWLRQZLOOVLJQL¿FDQWO\LQFVHFWLRQZLOOVLJQL¿VHFWLRQZLOOVLJQL¿FDQWO\LQFUHDVHWKHFDSDFLW\ of this line. Logically,L installinstallation of CTC here should be accompanied by instinstallation of CTC on AAFAFTapproximatelymately 90 miles of BNSFBNSF's Gateway Sub between Klamath Falls and BieberBieber, Calif. CTC has been installed from Bieber to KeKeddie on the Gateway Subdivision. Union MP 0.32 MP 1.0 0.68 UP UP When long freight trains are navigatingnavig twot 6 Capacity Safety and 3DFL¿F mphh curvesves just north of the StSteel Bridge, other (൶FLHQF\ (Kenton trains,s, includingluding passenger trains, can be dedelayed. line) Straighteninghteningng track and easing curvature wouwould permit moreore optimum speeds. This location wawas ¿UVWUHFRJQL]HGFLUFDDVDVLJQL¿FDQW3RUWODQGQL]HGFLUFDDVDVLJQL¿FDQW3RUWODQ area bottleneckeckFFT and has been included on a list of desirable Portlandland Triangle capacity improvement projects since then.hen. Fallbridge S. Lake N. Lake 1.5 BNSF BNSF Install remotely-controlledontrolled power switches and CaCCapacity Subdivision Yard Yard signals at both ends of Portland's Lake Yard to 2උൾ඀ඈඇ6ඍൺඍൾ5ൺංඅ3අൺඇ expedite ability of freightight trains to arrive and Appendix C—RailNeeds depart the facility, reducingcing delays andnd interference between passenger and freightreightT trains. Fallbridge Willbridge Willbridge 0.5 BNSF BNSF Using ARRA funding, ODOTOT completed 30% plans CCapacityapacity Subdivision for replacing 10 mph crossoversvers at this junctionnction ZLWKPSKFURVVRYHUVIRULPSURYLQJÀXLGLW\DQGSURYLQJÀXLGLW\DQGQJÀXLGLW\DQG reducing delays for passenger andndd freight trains. 153 Project funds are needed to do the improvement. Appendix C-Part1Continued Appendix C—RailNeeds 2උൾ඀ඈඇ6ඍൺඍൾ5ൺංඅ3අൺඇ 154 Line Description of Need / Freight Mobility Issue Secondary Start End Miles Operatorperator Owner Category Segment DRAFTDDR with the Facility Category Oregon MP 20.2 MP 26.2 6 WYCO WYCO ReplaceR 75-lb. rail from MP 20.2 to about 26.2 with Capacity Eastern heheavier rail to increase carrying capacity of entire Division linelin to GVW of 286,000 lbs. Line currently limited to 263263,000-lb. cars. The customer served is an Eagle PilcherPil mine, a major employer and taxpayer in MalheurM County. Oregon Wilsonville Washington MP 3E- PNWR ODOT Replace/recReplace/reconstruct existing rail bridge over Capacity Safety and Electric County 40.3 Grahams FerrFerry Road to improve horizontal and (൶FLHQF\ Subdivision vertical clearancesclearan for motor vehicles below RRArailroad. Current structure is narrow and has restricted vertical cclearance, resulting in occasional vehicle strikes that ddisrupt PNWR freight and TriMet WES commutecommucommuter train operations. Woodburn- MP 732.2 MP 735.7 Up to UPUP This project would transtrtranspose the mainline and Capacity Safety & Gervais 3.5 siding at Gervais, thenth extextend the siding 1 mile (൶FLHQF\ Siding north to connect withw the exexisting Woodburn siding; and install crossoverscro at south end of Woodburn. The north end of this elongated siding, which is in AAFdowntownwn Woodburn, would concontinue to be used for interchange between UP and WWillamette Valley RailwayRailway.. Salem Yard MP 716.7 MP 717.85 1.15 UP UP Power up and signalize switch providingprovidinprov access Capacity Safety & Power to the south end of Salem yard, andan a crocrossover (൶FLHQF\ Switches providingvidingg access to the north ende of the yayard near Hiness Street.eet. Vertical MP 54.5 MP 54.6 0.1 PNWR ODOT Tunnel #3,, 189 feet through solid rock, requirerequires Capacity Safety & Clearances, notching to accept double-stack containers. (൶FLHQF\ West/ Through-trussuss FTswing spans at MP 62.67, ClatskanClatskanie and Astoria River, and MP 84.71, Blind Slough, were Economic extrapolated byy 2009 bridge survey to be okay for Development double-stack movementsvements so the tunnel is the only known restriction for handling two-high containers. Vertical MP 669.5 MP 751.3 81.8 CBR Port of A 2009 tunnel surveyy conducted byy Shannon & Capacity;Capa Economic Clearances, Coos :LOVRQLGHQWL¿HGLPSHGLPHQWVWRWKHSDVVDJHRIHGLPHQWVWRWKHSDVVDJHRIHSDVVDJ Safety & Development Coos Bay Bay double-stack containers in all nine of theh tunnels (൶FLHQF\(൶FLHQ (13 thru 21 inclusive) on the TCoos Bay line. Recommended solutions variedaried from undercutting,ting, realignment, blasting, notchingng and set replacement,placement, depending upon the tunnel. Duringuring the 10 years since this study was done, rehabilitationilitationlitation work has occurred on some of the tunnels andnd some issues noted in 2009 may no longer exist. Appendix C-Part1Continued Line Description of Need / Freight Mobility Issue Secondary Start EndDRAFTDDRDRA Milesles Operator Owner Category Segment with the Facility Category Irving MP 652.25 MP 652.35 0.1 UP UP InstallInstIn a power switch at MP 652.28 on Irving siding Safety & Capacity Siding for remotelyre controlled access to/from Eugene Yard (൶FLHQF\ Power and the controlled Irving siding. Switch Queen MP 690.40 UP,UP, UUPP Main UP roroute through the valley. Amtrak passenger Safety & Ave Grade PNWR, route.ute. The crcrossing is adjacent to a major railroad (൶FLHQF\ Separation AERC,ERC, yard. The croscrossing is blocked several times a day Project Amtrakmtrak due to railroad ooperations in the yard. We receive a RAhigh number of blblockage complaints from citizens. Three separate railrrailroads operate over the crossing. There a four tracks throughth the crossing. Queen Ave is a local route for schoscschool children to walk. Multiple incidents at the crossing,cross with fatalities over the last 20 years. Several crossingcr incidents prior to 1998. La Pine MP 28.30 BNSF/UPBNSF NSF For several yearsyear has remainedremain the #1 crossing Safety & Grade in the state for grade separationseparation. The crossing is (൶FLHQF\ Separation skewed. A majorajor Hwy route throthrough central Oregon Project AFand is used heavily by freight, witwith a speed of 50 MPH. Hwy is high speed. Few incidincidents between train and Hwy user, but several incideincidincidents of rear end collisions with vehicles stoppestopped at the crossing. Recentecent attempt at constructing newn grade separated FURVVLQJIDLOHG7UDLQWUD൶FLVLQFUHDVLQJWKURXJKVLQJIDLOHG7UDLQWUD൶FLVLQFUHDVLQJWKIDLOHG7UDLQWUD൶FLV this corridor.orridor.or. Highway MP 104.00 PNWR BNSF Hwy 34 iss a major route (both passenger and Safety & Mobility 34 Grade freight) fromom I-5 to the west (Corvallis and then the (൶FLHQF\ Separation coast). The Hwy,FT at the crossing, is four lanes with a Project - center two wayay turn lane, and the speed is 55 MPH. Albany The Hwy has experiencedxperienced several rear end collisions with vehicles stoppedpped at the crossing. Visibility is restricted in the areaea at times due to thick fog.fo 2උൾ඀ඈඇ6ඍൺඍൾ5ൺංඅ3අൺඇ McGilchrist MP 717.10 UP, UP Main UP route throughgh the valley. Amtrak passenger SafetSafety & Appendix C—RailNeeds Grade Amtrak route. The crossing is adjacent to a major rrailroad (൶FLHQ(൶FLHQF\ Separation yard. The crossing is blockedcked several times a day Project - due to railroad operations in Tthe yard. McGilchristt is Salem a major arterial and the two lane road has surpassedrpassed LW VDELOLW\WRKDQGOHWKHDPRXQWRIGDLO\WUD൶FQWRIGDLO\WUD൶F\WUD൶F Salem is investigating wideningg thehe road (four ODQHV DQGDGGLQJVLGHZDONV1HDUE\WUD൶FVLJQDODUE\WUD൶FVLJQDODUE\WUD൶FVLJQDO 155 3ULQJOH5G UHJXODUO\EDFNVWUD൶FXSDFURVVWKHXSDFURVVWKHXSDFURVVWK tracks. Large number of near miss reportsports from the 839LGHRRIFURVVLQJYHUL¿HVYHKLFOHVTXHXLQJVTXHXLQJ across the tracks. Appendix C-Part1Continued Appendix C—RailNeeds 2උൾ඀ඈඇ6ඍൺඍൾ5ൺංඅ3අൺඇ 156 Line Description of Need / Freight Mobility Issue Secondary Start End Miles Operator OwnerOwne Category Segment with the Facility Category Harmony MP 762.40DRAFTDDRDRA UP,UP, UP Main UP route through the valley. Amtrak passenger Safety & Road Grade AAmtrak,mtrak, URUURXWH*UDGHVHSDUDWLRQSURMHFWLVLGHQWL¿HGLQWKH (൶FLHQF\ Separation PNPNWPNWRWR cityci of Milwaukies TSP. Several crossing incident Project - priorpr to 1998. Adjacent hwy intersection backs Milwaukie WUD൶FWUWUD൶FXSDFURVVWUDFNV Gateway Bieber Line Bieber Line 0.5BNSF/UP BNSF/ InitiallyI submitted for Connect Oregon VI Safety and Subdivision Jct. Jct. UUPP consideraticonsideration,derati this well-developed project signalizes (൶FLHQF\ and remotely controls the junction switch in Klamath Falls where BNSF trains leave/enter Union RRA3DFL¿F VOLQHHO3DFL¿F VOLQHHOLPLQDWLQJWKHQHHGWRVWRSDQG manually handle switches there, thus reducing train
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Choices 3
    Transportation Choices 3 MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE | MOVEMENT OF FREIGHT AND GOODS Introduction Facilities Snapshot This chapter organizes the transportation system into two categories: movement of people, and movement of freight and goods. Movement of people encompasses active transportation, transit, rail, air, and automobiles. Movement of freight and goods encompasses rail, marine cargo, air, vehicles, and pipelines. 3 Three Airports: one commercial, two Community Consistent with federal legislation (23 CFR 450.306) and Washington State Legislation (RCW 47.80.030), the regional transportation system includes: 23 Twenty-three Fixed Transit Routes ▶All state-owned transportation facilities and services (highways, park-and-ride lots, etc); 54 Fifty-Four Miles of Multi-Use Trails ▶All local principal arterials and selected minor arterials the RTPO considers necessary to the plan; 2.1 Multi- ▶Any other transportation facilities and services, existing and Two Vehicles per Household* proposed, including airports, transit facilities and services, roadways, Modal rail facilities, marine transportation facilities, pedestrian/bicycle Transport facilities, etc., that the RTPO considers necessary to complete the 5 regional plan; and Five Rail Lines System ▶Any transportation facility or service that fulfills a regional need or impacts places in the plan, as determined by the RTPO. 4 Four Ports *Source: US Census Bureau, 2014 ACS 5-year estimates. Chapter 3 | Transportation Choices 39 Figure 3-1: JourneyMode to ChoiceWork -ModeJourney Choice to Work in the RTPO, 2014 Movement of People Walk/ Bike, Public Transit, 2.2% Other, 4.3% People commute for a variety of reasons, and likewise, a variety of 1.2% ways. This section includes active transportation, transit, passenger Carpooled, 12.6% rail, passenger air, and passenger vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • View My List of Miscellaneous Material
    M1913 "Our Native American Legacy: Northwest Towns with Indian Names", by Sandy Nestor. 2001-00-00 20.00 Published 2001 by Caxton Press, Caldwell ID. Measures 6" x 9"; 287 pages, perfectbound. Excellent condition. Includes places in Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Alaska. M1900 "Apple City USA: Stories of Early Wenatchee (Washington)", by Bruce Mitchell. Published by 1992-00-00 10.00 The Wenatchee World. 7" x 9.75", folded and center-stapled, in heavy paper covers. 128 pages, illustrated, indexed. Twenty-two stories, including items of steamboat and railway interest. As new, still with original price tag on inside front cover. M1909 "An Album of Railways of Queensland, Volume 6". Published by the Australian Model Railway 2003-00-00 15.00 Association Queensland Branch. 8.25" x 11.75", center-stapled, 48 pages in cardstock covers. Two photos to most pages, most photos in color. Freight, passenger, steam, diesel, electric, old, new - it's all here. M1912 "Columbia River Gorge Volume 1: BNSF's Fallbridge Subdivision". Two-hour DVD published by 2005-00-00 20.00 Pentrex in 2005. Still wrapped in original plastic; never been opened. M1910 "United Railways of Oregon", by Harley K Hallgren and John F Due. Published by Pacific 1961-06-00 15.00 Railway Journal; first printing, June 1961. This is a good-quality XEROX COPY of this book. Additionally, an employee timetable that was just barely readable in the book (due to being printed size-reduced) has been mostly transcribed so that the information may be read without causing blindness. Includes illustrations, maps, car diagrams, timetables.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 1 9 13 23 29 39 47 59 61 65 67 69
    TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 9 III. EXISTING RAILROAD OPERATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE 13 IV. STATIONS 23 V. SERVICE RESTORATION ALTERNATIVES 29 VI. RIDERSHIP AND OPERATING COST ANALYSIS 39 VII. CAPITAL COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 47 VIII. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE 59 IX. PUBLIC OUTREACH 61 X. PUBLIC BENEFITS 65 XI. CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS 67 XII. EXHIBITS 69 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background This report examines the feasibility of reinstating Amtrak’s Pioneer route, which operated from 1977 to 1997 between Chicago, Illinois and Seattle, Washington via Denver, Colorado and Salt Lake City/Ogden, Utah. Amtrak was directed to perform this study by the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) (Public Law 110‐432), which reauthorized Amtrak and tasked Amtrak, the Federal government, states, and other rail stakeholders to improve intercity passenger rail service. Section 224 of PRIIA requires Amtrak to undertake studies of reinstating the Pioneer route, and of reinstating or expanding service, or adding stops, on several other routes. Amtrak is to submit these studies to Congress by October 16, 2009. B. Route History When the Pioneer was established in June of 1977, it operated from Salt Lake City and Ogden to Seattle. At Ogden, Amtrak’s San Francisco Zephyr provided connecting service to/from Denver and Chicago for Pioneer route passengers. In 1980‐81, new bi‐ level Superliner equipment was placed in service on the Pioneer, which allowed the train to offer convenient “through car” service to Chicago via the Zephyr and eliminated the need for passengers to physically change trains in Ogden.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State's Freight Rail System
    Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System technical memorandum prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HDR, Inc. May 2006 www.wstc.com technical memorandum Statewide Rail Capacity and System Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. HDR, Inc. May 2006 May 2006 Statewide Rail Capacity and Needs Study Task 1.1.A – Freight Rail Systems Table of Contents Task 1.1.A – Washington State’s Freight Rail System ................................................... 1 Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 2 Freight Rail System Overview ..................................................................................... 2 Freight Railroad Descriptions...................................................................................... 5 Ballard Terminal Railroad.................................................................................... 5 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.............................................................. 5 Cascade & Columbia River Railroad.................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derailment of Amtrak Passenger Train No. 27 Home Valley, Washington
    RAN S P T O L R A T LURIBUS N P UNUM A E National Transportation Safety Board O T I I O T Washington, D.C. 20594 A N N S A D FE R T Y B OA Railroad Accident Brief Accident No.: DCA-05-FR-010 Location: Home Valley, Washington Date: April 3, 2005 Time: 9:35 a.m., Pacific daylight time1 Railroad: BNSF Railway Company Property Damage: $854,000 Injuries: 30 Fatalities: None Type of Accident: Amtrak passenger train derailment The Accident On April 3, 2005, about 9:35 a.m., westbound Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) passenger train No. 27, consisting of a single locomotive unit and four passenger cars, derailed at milepost (MP) 58.562 on the BNSF Railway Company’s (BNSF’s) Northwest Division. The train was traveling 60 mph on single main line track when it derailed as it was traveling through a cut section of the Columbia River Gorge on the north side of the Columbia River near Home Valley, Washington. The train remained upright; however, the cars came to rest leaning up to approximately 35° against the outside curved embankment. (See figure 1.) There were 106 passengers and 9 Amtrak employees on board. Thirty people (22 passengers and 8 employees) sustained minor injuries; 14 of those people were taken to local hospitals. Two of the injured passengers were kept overnight for further observation; the rest were released. Track and equipment damages, in addition to clearing costs associated with the accident, totaled about $854,000. The derailment occurred during daylight hours.
    [Show full text]
  • I-5 Rail Capacity Study
    I-5 Rail Capacity Study February 2003 Prepared by: 1001 S.W. 5th Avenue, Suite 1800 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 423-3700 phone (503) 423-3737 fax www.hdrinc.com I - 5 Rail Capacity Study Preface he I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership brought together Washington and Oregon citizens and Tleaders to respond to concerns about growing congestion in the I-5 Corridor. Governors Gary Locke Tand John Kitzhaber appointed a bi-state Task Force of community, business, and elected representatives to develop a strategic plan for the I-5 Corridor between I-84 in Oregon and I-205 in Washington. In developing the strategic plan, the Task Force was guided by the following Problem Statement: The Interstate 5 Corridor is the most critical segment of the regional transportation system in the Portland/Vancouver metropolitan area. The Corridor provides access to many of the region’s most important industrial sites and port facilities, and is a link to jobs throughout the Portland/Vancouver region. Due to infrastructure deficiencies, lack of multi-modal options, land use pattern and increasing congestion, businesses and individuals experience more frequent and longer delays in the Corridor. Without attention, the Corridor’s problems are likely to increase significantly, further impacting the mobility, accessibility, livability and economic promise of the entire Region. Rail Capacity Study As part of the ongoing I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Study, the Oregon and Washington Departments of Transportation examined the long-term need for, and availability of, rail capacity in the I- 5 Corridor between I-205 and I-84, and how it is affected by and affects operations throughout the Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law Board 7702 Case No. 6 Bnsf Railway Company Carrier Case No. 11-11-0029 V. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
    PUBLIC LAW BOARD 7702 CASE NO. 6 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY CARRIER CASE NO. 11-11-0029 V. BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION I IBT ORGANIZATION CASE NO. S-P-1549-G STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood : 1) The discipline (dismissal) imposed upon Mr. C. Van Ness by letter dated September 8, 2010 for alleged violation of MOWOR 11.3 and MOWOR 6.3.1 in connection with charges of failure to comply with track and time limits at approximately 1040 hours on or near Mile Post 76.044 Bingen, Washington the Fallbridge Subdivision, while hyrailing in Vehicle 22750 between Cooks and Lyle, Washington while working as a track inspector at Bingen, Washington on duty at 0700 hours was arbitrary, capricious and in violation of the Agreement (System File S-P-l 549-G/11- 11-0029 BNR). 2) The claim* as presented by Vice General Chairman M. Garisto on October 6, 2010 to Mr. D. Jones, Division Manager-Northwest Division, shall be allowed as presented because said claim was not disallowed by Mr. D. Jones in accordance with Rule 42A. 3) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, Claimant C. Van Ness shall now receive the remedy prescribed by the parties in Rule 40G. FINDINGS: The carrier and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively the carrier and the employee or employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934. Public Law Board 7702 has jurisdiction over the parties and the dispute involved herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Oregon State Rail Plan
    OREGON STATE RAIL PLAN An Element of the Oregon Transportation Plan Adopted September 18, 2014 Revised August 13, 2020 THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Plan development was supported by five Technical Memorandums that served as background for the document. A copy of the 2020 Oregon State Rail Plan and the Technical Memorandums, which reflect the latest information at the time of their development, can also be accessed at ODOT’s Statewide Policy Plans website and include: • Freight and Passenger System Inventory • Needs Assessment: Oregon’s Economy • Needs Assessment: Passenger Rail • Needs Assessment: Freight Rail • Investment Program Technical Report Oregon Statewide Policy Plans: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Pages/Plans.aspx#OSRP. To obtain additional copies of this document contact: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Transportation Development Division, Planning Section 555 13th Street NE, Suite 2 Salem, OR 97301-4178 (503) 986-4121 Copyright 2020 by the Oregon Department of Transportation Permission is given to quote and reproduce parts of this document if credit is given to the source. A copy of the draft as the Oregon Transportation Commission adopted is on file at the Oregon Department of Transportation. Limited editorial changes for consistency and formatting have been made in this document. Oregon Transportation Commission Catherine Mater, Chair Tammy Baney David Lohman Susan Morgan Alando Simpson* *Current OTC Members: Bob Van Brocklin, Chair, Julie Brown, Martin Callery, Sharon Smith, Alando Simpson Other Elements of the State Transportation Plan • Aviation System Plan • Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Freight Plan • Highway Plan • Public Transportation Plan • Oregon Statewide Transportation Strategy • Transportation Options Plan • Transportation Safety Action Plan OREGON STATE RAIL PLAN Development of the Oregon State Rail Plan was a joint effort between Oregon Department of Transportation Rail and Public Transit Division and the Transportation Development Division.* Produced by: RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSIT DIVISION H.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Rail Plan 2019- 2040
    WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019-2040 WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 August 2020 Prepared by: Washington State Department of Transportation Rail, Freight, and Ports Division Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at wsdotada@ wsdot.wa.gov or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Notificación de Titulo VI al Público Es la política del Departamento de Transportación del Estado de Washington (WSDOT, por sus siglas en inglés) asegurarse que ninguna persona, por razón de raza, color, origen, nacionalidad o sexo, según provee el Título VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964, pueda ser excluido de la participación, negado los beneficios de o ser discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Multimodal Transportation System
    2011-2032 Regional Transportation Plan CHAPTER FOUR – THE REGIONAL MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INTRODUCTION The regional multi-modal transportation system consists of state highways, county roads, city streets, park-and-ride lots, pedestrian/bicycle facilities, transit facilities, airports, railroads, river transportation facilities, and pipelines (natural gas and refined petroleum products). This chapter will review and present information on the individual components of the regional transportation system. Roadways are a primary element of the regional transportation system. An inventory of the state highway system in the RTPO is presented. Components of the regional state highway system are part of various Federal or state system classifications, which are detailed following the inventory. Those to be addressed in this chapter include: National Highway System (NHS) - The interstate system, other freeways and expressways, select principal arterials, and access routes to major airports, ports, public transportation facilities, and inter-modal terminals. Scenic & Recreational Highways – Part of the National Scenic Byways system with emphasis on preservation, maintenance, and enhancement of heritage resources, access to those resources, and tourism. Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) – NHS routes, rural highways serving statewide travel, urban links to rural HSS, long haul freight routes, and connections to ports. Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) - The Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHWEST DIVISION—No
    Northwest BNSF Safety Vision Division We believe every accident or injury is preventable. Our vision is that BNSF Railway will operate free of accidents and injuries. BNSF Railway will achieve this vision through: Timetable No. 3 A culture that makes safety our highest priority and provides continuous self-examination as to the IN EFFECT AT 0700 effectiveness of our safety process and performance ... Pacific Continental Time Wednesday April 26, 2006 A work environment, including the resources and tools, that is safe and accident-free where all known hazards will be eliminated or safe-guarded ... Work practices and training for all employees that Division General Manager make safety essential to the tasks we perform ... Douglas B. Jones Seattle, WA An empowered work force, including all employees, (206) 625-6333 that takes responsibility for personal safety, the safety of fellow employees, and the communities in which we serve. General Director Transportation R.T. Bartoskewitz Seattle, WA (206) 625-6266 2 NORTHWEST DIVISION—No. 3—April 26, 2006—Map NORTHWEST DIVISION—No. 2—April 26, 2006—Division Managers 3 Division Managers Bellingham Seattle (continued) A. FRANCO, JR ............ Roadmaster ........................ (360) 922-1401 D.E. KAUTZMANN ......... Road Foreman(206) 272-3620T.E. MARTIN T.L. NIES ........................ Trainmaster ........................ (360) 922-1477 Asst. Terminal Supt. ....... (206) 272-3663 R.J. MASON .................. Terminal Trainmaster .......... (206) 272-3743 Bend S.B. PIERCE .................. Terminal Manager .............. (206) 272-3735 P.H. HJERTSTEDT ....... Trainmaster ........................ (541) 385-7530 R.B. ROPER .................. B&B Supervisor .................. (206) 625-6295 P. TOLENTINO .............. Roadmaster ........................ (541) 385-7539 T.N. ROWLEY................ Terminal Superintendent .... (206) 272-3719 Bingen E.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transportation Plan Tri‐Cities Metropolitan
    REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE TRI‐CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA AND THE BENTON, FRANKLIN, WALLA WALLA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2011‐2032 Adopted November 2011, Revised May 2012 2011-2032 Regional Transportation Plan PREFACE The Benton-Franklin Council of Governments (BFCG) serves as the lead agency for both the Tri-Cities Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Benton-Franklin-Walla Walla Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). In accordance with state and federal transportation planning requirements, the BFCG has coordinated with area jurisdictions in the development of this combined Regional and Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The intents of this long-range transportation plan are to establish the vision for the region and provide the means to attain that vision. It identifies the issues and concerns associated with the transportation system in the region, as well as the policies and specific programs intended to address those concerns. The plan provides an inventory of the current system as well as providing metropolitan area forecasts for population, employment, and traffic to be anticipated during the life of the plan. Development of the 2011-2032 Metropolitan & Regional Transportation Plan required the efforts of local area planners and engineering staff from each of the BFCG’s member agencies. In addition, elected officials from each agency aided in formulating the policies contained in the plan and the review of its’ content. BFCG staff was integral in providing the layout of the plan, the coordination of interacting with the many members, as well as the collection of information and efforts described within the plan. Without the collective effort of all involved, successful formulation of the plan would not be possible.
    [Show full text]