DOCSLIB.ORG

WA State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan December 2009 For more information, contact: Call the WSDOT State Rail and Marine Office at (360) 705-7900; Write to the WSDOT State Rail and Marine Office at P.O. Box 47407, Olympia, WA 98504-7407; Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821; or E-mail your comments to [email protected] Americans with Disabilities Act Information: Materials can be provided in alternative formats: large print, Braille, cassette tape, or on computer disk for people with disabilities by calling the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) at (360) 705-7097. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact OEO through the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. Title VI Statement to Public: It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin and sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan Prepared by Washington State Department of Transportation State Rail and Marine Office December 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction............................................................................................ES-1 2030 Vision for Freight Rail in Washington State ................................ES-2 Rail Infrastructure Needs and Investment Program...............................ES-8 Preservation of At-Risk Railroads .........................................................ES-8 Freight System Issues and Needs.........................................................ES-14 Statewide Information and Data Needs ...............................................ES-17 The Partners .........................................................................................ES-18 Investment Prioritization and Project Evaluation ................................ES-18 Financing the Needs.............................................................................ES-19 State Role.............................................................................................ES-19 Conclusion ...........................................................................................ES-20 Chapter 1: Plan Purpose and Authority Purpose of the State Freight Rail Plan..................................................... 1-1 Washington State Department of Transportation .................................... 1-1 WSDOT’s State Rail and Marine Office ................................................. 1-1 State and Federal Legislative and Planning Requirements...................... 1-2 Development of the State Freight Rail Plan ............................................ 1-4 Plan Organization .................................................................................... 1-9 Chapter 2: State Rail Vision Introduction.............................................................................................. 2-1 Macroeconomic Environment.................................................................. 2-3 Changes in Transportation....................................................................... 2-4 Vision of Rail Transportation in Washington State................................. 2-9 Goals, Objectives, Strategies, and Actions.............................................. 2-9 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 2-16 Chapter 3: Rail System and Freight Rail Services in Washington State Overview of Washington State Rail System Services ............................. 3-1 Washington State Freight Rail System Profiles....................................... 3-5 Capacity of the Washington State Rail System ..................................... 3-20 Recent Major Policy Changes Impacting the Rail System in Washington State ................................................................................... 3-29 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan December 2009 Table of Contents Page i Chapter 4: Freight Rail Services – Effects on the Economy and Society Functions of Freight in Washington’s Economy ..................................... 4-1 Freight Rail in Washington’s Economy................................................... 4-2 Major Drivers in Freight Rail Demand.................................................. 4-13 Future Demand – Washington State Rail Forecast................................ 4-18 Chapter 5: The Changing Rail System – Issue Discussion and Needs Assessment Overview of Issues and Needs Assessment............................................. 5-1 Rail Abandonments: Recent, Proposed, and At-Risk Lines .................... 5-3 Port Access ............................................................................................ 5-10 Intermodal Connectors........................................................................... 5-16 Rail Freight System Issues and Needs................................................... 5-20 New Services ......................................................................................... 5-29 Emerging Issues..................................................................................... 5-29 Summary................................................................................................ 5-44 Chapter 6: State Roles and Partners Washington State’s Current Roles........................................................... 6-1 Washington’s Strategic Partners.............................................................. 6-6 Strategic Planning.................................................................................. 6-10 Future Roles........................................................................................... 6-12 Continued Statewide Coordination and Partnerships ............................ 6-14 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 6-15 Chapter 7: Investment Prioritizing and Project Evaluation Public and Private Benefits...................................................................... 7-1 Freight Rail Investment Analysis in Washington State........................... 7-3 Rail Benefit/Impact Evaluation Methodology – Description ................ 7-11 Limitations and Future Improvements................................................... 7-16 Chapter 8: Financing Washington’s Freight Rail System Needs for Investment ............................................................................... 8-1 Funding for Freight Rail ........................................................................ 8-10 Current Funding Sources ....................................................................... 8-14 Strategies................................................................................................ 8-28 Vision for Future Funding ..................................................................... 8-30 Summary................................................................................................ 8-32 December 2009 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan Page ii Table of Contents Chapter 9: Challenges and Opportunities Transportation Challenges ....................................................................... 9-1 Transportation Opportunities: Implementation of the Plan ..................... 9-3 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 9-7 List of Exhibits Exhibit ES-1: Washington State Rail Map ...........................................ES-4 Exhibit ES-2: Washington State Rail Freight Directional Flows - 2007 ..................................................................ES-5 Exhibit ES-3: Top 10 Commodities Shipped by Rail Washington State 2007 ..................................................ES-6 Exhibit ES-4: Freight-Dependent Sectors Employment Washington State 2008 First Quarter.............................ES-7 Exhibit ES-5: Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Mode ............................ES-7 Exhibit ES-6: Washington Rail Investments ........................................ES-9 Exhibit ES-7: Ports of Washington State............................................ES-11 Exhibit ES-8: Intermodal Freight Connectors in Washington State...ES-13 Exhibit 2-1: Washington 2005 GHG Emissions .................................. 2-6 Exhibit 2-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Mode .............................. 2-7 Exhibit 3-1: Washington State Rail System......................................... 3-2 Exhibit 3-2: Washington State Rail Freight 1991 to 2007................... 3-4 Exhibit 3-3: Rail Freight Flows in Washington State – 2007.............. 3-5 Exhibit 3-4: Freight Rail Intermodal Traffic – Washington State 2007 .................................................... 3-5 Exhibit 3-5: Washington Freight Railroads, Mileage, and Class......... 3-7 Exhibit 3-6: Rail Service Corridors in Washington State.................... 3-8 Exhibit 3-7: Rail Intermodal Facilities in Washington State ............. 3-15 Exhibit 3-8: Railroad Terminals and Yards Impacting Washington State Rail Movements................................ 3-16 Exhibit 3-9: 2008 Rail Line Capacity ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder

    R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder

    Burke-Gilman Trail Elliott Bay Trail Snoqualmie Valley Trail Interurban Trail (North) Cedar River Trail he Regional Trails System in King County contains over 40 unique trails offering some 300 miles of distinc- tive greenways and off-street routes that allow travel from the Puget Sound to the Surface and Grade Soft-surface with a gentle grade that Surface and Grade Paved with a flat grade, follows follows the route of the historic Milwaukee Road railroad with Surface and Grade Paved with a gentle grade, follows Surface and Grade Paved for its first 12 miles until Cascade Mountains. Defined primarily by the route of the historic Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern a 2.5-mile on-street detour around the Snoqualmie Mill site. the route of the historic Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway intersecting the Green-to-Cedar Rivers Trail and continues wide, paved trails or hard gravel paths Railway along Lake Union and Lake Washington. Surface and Grade Paved and flat, with a separate Length 31 miles, travels through the Snoqualmie Valley that operated in the early part of the 20th Century. as a soft-surface trail for its last 5 miles to Landsburg Park. Length 20 miles, stretches from Seattle to Bothell and pedestrian walking path that follows the trail through from Duvall to North Bend and on to Rattlesnake Lake Length 5 miles, links Seattle and Shoreline north to Length 17 miles, follows the gentle grade of the historic with gentle grades, they are perfect op- links with the Sammamish River Trail forming part of the Myrtle Edwards Park.
  • AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting

    AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting

    AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting 3:30 PM - Monday, August 13, 2018 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal a) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. 2. Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study a) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. 3. Vouchers a) Accounts Payable b) Benefits' Deductions c) Payroll (located in Dropbox) 4. Emerging Issues in Finance AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew.
  • Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Draft Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

    Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Draft Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

    EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL DRAFT MASTER PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KING COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION FEBRUARY 2016 Dear Friends: In our rapidly developing region, we are fortunate to be able to preserve the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) in public ownership from Renton to Snohomish. The regional vision for the ERC is to develop a multi-use corridor that enhances mobility and connectivity, supports utility infrastructure needs, and provides recreational opportunities. Within this broader vision, the ERC offers a unique opportunity to create a nonmotorized (regional trail) connection between many vibrant, growing, and dynamic areas, providing a safe and enjoyable recreational experience for people of all ages and abilities and promoting healthy, livable communities. One day, it’s possible this corridor may connect from Vancouver WA to Vancouver BC. The intent is to develop a regional trail in the 15.6 miles of ERC under its ownership and the 1.1 miles of ERC owned by Sound Transit in which the County holds a trail easement that does not preclude future transit or utility use of the ERC, while meeting the following objectives: Connect Eastside communities by linking to: o Existing and planned regional and local trails o Transit centers, park and rides, and East Link light rail stations o Residential, commercial, and business centers Provide nonmotorized active transportation options and expand recreational opportunities to: o Benefit public health o Improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions o Expand access for underserved areas of King County Incorporate Eastside heritage and culture Support opportunities for economic development This Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is an important first step towards planning, environmental review, design, and construction of a regional trail in the corridor.
  • Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State

    Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State

    Draft Report June 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Washington State Joint Transportation Committee Our ref: 23685001 Draft Report June 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Washington State Joint Transportation Committee 2201 Cooperative Way, Suite 606 Columbia Street NW, 600 Suite 105, Herndon, VA 20171 Olympia, WA 98504-0937 +1 (703) 788-6500 www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23685001 Steer has prepared this material for Washington State Joint Transportation Committee. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State | Draft Report Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i Overview ...........................................................................................................................................
  • Transportation Choices 3

    Transportation Choices 3

    Transportation Choices 3 MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE | MOVEMENT OF FREIGHT AND GOODS Introduction Facilities Snapshot This chapter organizes the transportation system into two categories: movement of people, and movement of freight and goods. Movement of people encompasses active transportation, transit, rail, air, and automobiles. Movement of freight and goods encompasses rail, marine cargo, air, vehicles, and pipelines. 3 Three Airports: one commercial, two Community Consistent with federal legislation (23 CFR 450.306) and Washington State Legislation (RCW 47.80.030), the regional transportation system includes: 23 Twenty-three Fixed Transit Routes ▶All state-owned transportation facilities and services (highways, park-and-ride lots, etc); 54 Fifty-Four Miles of Multi-Use Trails ▶All local principal arterials and selected minor arterials the RTPO considers necessary to the plan; 2.1 Multi- ▶Any other transportation facilities and services, existing and Two Vehicles per Household* proposed, including airports, transit facilities and services, roadways, Modal rail facilities, marine transportation facilities, pedestrian/bicycle Transport facilities, etc., that the RTPO considers necessary to complete the 5 regional plan; and Five Rail Lines System ▶Any transportation facility or service that fulfills a regional need or impacts places in the plan, as determined by the RTPO. 4 Four Ports *Source: US Census Bureau, 2014 ACS 5-year estimates. Chapter 3 | Transportation Choices 39 Figure 3-1: JourneyMode to ChoiceWork -ModeJourney Choice to Work in the RTPO, 2014 Movement of People Walk/ Bike, Public Transit, 2.2% Other, 4.3% People commute for a variety of reasons, and likewise, a variety of 1.2% ways. This section includes active transportation, transit, passenger Carpooled, 12.6% rail, passenger air, and passenger vehicles.
  • (BNSF) Mesa, WA July 2, 2012

    (BNSF) Mesa, WA July 2, 2012

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2012-21 BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) Mesa, WA July 2, 2012 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2012-21 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. BNSF Rwy Co. [BNSF] BNSF NW0712102 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 4.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 4a. Alphabetic Code 4b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. BNSF Rwy Co. [BNSF] BNSF NW0712102 5. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 6. Date of Accident/Incident 7. Time of Accident/Incident Month 07 Day 02 Year 2012 06:30: AM PM 8. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other Code (single entry in code box) (describe in 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 9. Cars Carrying 10.
  • Scoping Summary Report

    Scoping Summary Report

    Regional Transit Long-Range Plan Update Scoping Summary Report February 2014 Scoping Summary Report Contents 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 Purpose of Report ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3 Long-Range Plan Update Process ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4 Scoping Process Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4.1 Public notices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 4.2 Public scoping meetings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 4.3 Agency scoping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 4.4 Other outreach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 4.5 Comment opportunities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5 Summary of Comments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.1 Overview of comments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.2 Comments from agencies, tribes, and jurisdictions ---------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.1 Washington State Department of Ecology ----------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.2
  • Idaho County School Survey Report PSLLC

    Idaho County School Survey Report PSLLC

    CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY HISTORIC RURAL SCHOOLS OF IDAHO COUNTY Prepared for IDAHO COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANGEVILLE, IDAHO By PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS LLC September 1, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Preface: What is a Cultural Resource Survey? ........................................................................... 3 Methodology Survey Objectives ........................................................................................................... 4 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................. 7 Survey Findings Dates of Construction .................................................................................................... 12 Functional Property Types ............................................................................................. 13 Building Forms .............................................................................................................. 13 Architectural Styles ........................................................................................................ 19 Historic Contexts Idaho County: A Development Overview: 1860s to 1950s ............................................. 24 Education in Idaho County: 1860s to
  • Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State

    Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State

    Final Report July 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Washington State Joint Transportation Committee Our ref: 23685001 Final Report July 2020 Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Washington State Joint Transportation Committee 2201 Cooperative Way, Suite 606 Columbia Street NW, 600 Suite 105, Herndon, VA 20171 Olympia, WA 98504-0937 +1 (703) 788-6500 Click here to enter text. www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23685001 Steer has prepared this material for Washington State Joint Transportation Committee. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Feasibility of an East-West Intercity Passenger Rail System for Washington State | Final Report Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i Overview ...........................................................................................................................................
  • October /November 2007

    October /November 2007

    Washington Rail News October /November 2007 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." passenger system in the U.S. and continu- Update on the Amtrak Cascades and the ing to develop state partnerships. The Legislature has asked WSDOT for Northwest Corridor from Ken Uznanski an updated midrange Cascades vision. The Ken Uznanski, WSDOT Rail Office quently adjusted two more times to provide report is due Dec. 2008. Ken said we would manager, spoke at the Aug. 11 All more consistent operation. “Amtrak has be looking at 7-8 Seattle-Portland round- Aboard Washington picnic in Puyallup. done a tremendous job” restoring trips a day. He noted that several key leg- Everyone, of course, wanted to know Northwest rail service, concluded Ken. islators are saying 2009 will be the rail about the Talgo trainsets being pulled He recounted his trip to Spain in June session. from service on Thursday Aug. 2 when as part of a trade mission. Also on the trip Ridership on the Cascades has been were Amtrak Pres. Alex Kummant and gov- cracks were discovered in the upper strong this year, up 11% through August. ernment affairs Vice Pres. Joe McHugh. This despite the August drop due to the parts of some of the suspension systems. They met with various government officials These systems provide the ability for the days of cancelled and reduced service. and with Renfre, the Spanish National Rail- Even with the substitute equipment, rider- trains to travel faster through curves than ways. Renfre is spending 1.2-1.6 bill.
  • Real Estate Service for North Central Idaho

    Real Estate Service for North Central Idaho

    EXPERIENCE North Central Visitor’s Guide | 2016 | 2017 2 EXPERIENCE NORTH CENTRAL IDAHO 4 Idaho County 10 Osprey: Birds of Prey 12 Clearwater County 16 US Highway 12 Waterfalls 22 Lewis County From the deepest gorge in 28 Heart of the Monster: History of the Nimiipuu North America to the prairies of harvest 34 Nez Perce County (and everything else in between). 39 The Levee Come explore with us. SARAH S. KLEMENT, 42-44Dining Guide PUBLISHER Traveling On? Regional Chamber Directory DAVID P. RAUZI, 46 EDITOR CONTRIBUTED PHOTO: MICHELLE FORD COVER PHOTO BY ROBERT MILLAGE. Advertising Inquires Submit Stories SARAH KLEMENT, PUBLISHER DAVID RAUZI, EDITOR Publications of Eagle Media Northwest [email protected] [email protected] 900 W. Main, PO Box 690, Grangeville ID 83530 DEB JONES, PUBLISHER (MONEYSAVER) SARAH KLEMENT, PUBLISHER 208-746-0483, Lewiston; 208-983-1200, Grangeville [email protected] [email protected] EXPERIENCE NORTH CENTRAL IDAHO 3 PHOTO BY ROBERT MILLAGE 4 EXPERIENCE NORTH CENTRAL IDAHO PHOTO BY SARAH KLEMENT PHOTO BY DAVID RAUZI A scenic view of the Time Zone Bridge greets those entering or leaving the Idaho County town of Riggins (above) while McComas Meadows (top, right) is a site located in the mountains outside of Harpster. (Right, middle) Hells Canyon is a popular fishing spot and (bottom, right) the Sears Creek area is home to a variety of wildlife, including this flock of turkeys. Idaho County — said to be named for the Steamer Idaho that was launched June 9, 1860, on the Columbia River — spans the Idaho PHOTO BY MOUNTAIN RIVER OUTFITTERS panhandle and borders three states, but imposing geography sets this area apart from the rest of the United States.
  • Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339 Web Site

    Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339 Web Site

    IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Case No. GNW- 04- June 8, 2004 Contact: Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339 Web site: www.puc.state.id. Commission to hold rail abandonment hearing BOISE - The Idaho Public Utilities Commission will conduct a public hearing in Orofino later this month regarding Great Northwest Railroad' s request to abandon a 31-mile stretch of railway in north-central Idaho. Great Northwest intends to file a petition with the federal Surface Transportation Board to abandon the J aype branch line in Clearwater County. The line follows Orofino Creek from Orofino to Jaype. Great Northwest is the successor to the Camas Prairie Railroad. The Surface Transportation Board, a division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, is authorized to grant or deny rail abandonments. However, Idaho Code 62-424 requires the commission to schedule a public hearing to determine 1) whether the abandonment adversely affects the area served, 2) whether it impairs access of Idaho shippers to vital goods and markets and 3) whether the rail line still has potential for profitability. If the commission finds these factors to be true, it may choose to represent the state in the Surface Transportation Board' abandonment proceeding. Great Northwest is applying for an exemption that would allow the line to be abandoned within 30 days. A railroad can file for an exemption from a longer process if it can certify that no rail traffic has moved on the line in two years and there are no outstanding complaints about the lack of rail service on the line. The commission hearing is scheduled for June 28 at 1 p.m.