DOCSLIB.ORG

Logan Avenue Trail Transitions to On- Street Bike Lanes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Logan Avenue Trail Transitions to On- Street Bike Lanes PROJECT REVIEW Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Project Review • Update to the 2009 Plan • Update to new development and current planning efforts • Collaborate with King County on regional trail connections • Incorporate new facility types and preferred routes • Maintain eligibility for grant funding 2 PROJECT REVIEW Goals Goal A: Improving safety Improve safety for non‐motorized use and facilities. Goal B: Creating an accessible and connected system. Develop an inter‐connected trail network. Goal C: Promoting physical and environmental health. Improve the health of the community through sustainable design and increase the rates of walking, running and bicycling. Goal D: Achieving equity Ensure that all members of the community have equal access to walking and bicycling facilities. Goal E: Enhancing the economy and community Enhance the economy and vibrancy of the community by increasing walking and bicycling. 3 PROJECT REVIEW Schedule 2017 2018 May June July August September October November December January February Meetings and Public C S P S P C S P C C Events Project TAC Meeting Open House TAC Meeting Open House Project TAC Meeting Open House Draft Plan Plan Introduction #1 Meeting #1 #2 Meeting #2 Update #3 Meeting #3 Presentation Adoption Interactive Map and Survey Draft Master Plan Final Master Plan 4 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #1 Eastside Rail Corridor Alignment “Preferred alignment along Houser Way” “Houser Way is a good potential trail route from Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park to the Cedar River Trail. Houser Way to Sunset Boulevard has low traffic volume and parking along the east side of the road is not in high demand.” 35 Attendees SW 7th Street “Walking along 7th Street would not be as pleasant as walking along the RR ROW (Lake to Sound trail alignments)” “Need road diet (on SW 7th Street) in 2017” 5 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #1 Lake to Sound Trail Alignment “I like this (alignment along the BNSF corridor) if possible” “Important to use RR ROW for Lake to Sound to Cedar River Trail” Sam Chastain Trail “Complete (the proposed) Sam Chastain (trail) segment.” “Make this happen! (the Sam Chastain trail segment)” 6 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #1 Intersections “Problem for cyclists on road crossings (along the Cedar River Trail in the downtown)” “Difficult turns, unclear route (at Houser Way and Lake Washington Boulevard)” Burnett Linear Park “Complete Burnett Linear Park to Cedar River; reconfigure parking” “Burnett as a green space with grass, basketball courts, place to kick a soccer ball” 7 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #2 Regional Trails • Lake to Sound Trail connection along BNSF ROW is “great”. • Improve wayfinding to help make connections between regional trails through the City Center. • Logan Avenue trail transitions to on‐ street bike lanes needs to be improved. 26 Attendees Off‐Street Trails • Make May Creek connection under I‐405. • Connect the Honey Creek and May Creek Trails 8 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #2 Important Intersections to consider (in addition to those identified as part of the Civic Core/Trails Plan planning process) • Grady Way at Rainier Avenue S (site of future transit center) • Logan Avenue at N. 6th and N. 8th Streets • Airport Way at Shattuck Avenue • 116th Avenue SE (multiple locations) • Puget Drive SE (multiple locations) • SW 43rd St./S 180th Street (multiple locations) • Carr Road/Petrovitsky Road (multiple locations) 9 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Interactive Map 342 Data Points 10 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Interactive Map Biking Problem Spots “Need a safe bike route…” (#27) “7th Ave is too busy for bikes to share during rush hour and both side walks are in an extreme state of disrepair…” (#60) “Need better way to connect downtown Renton with Interurban Trail and Tukwila Train Station” (#24) “Not a safe bike crossing” (#5) 11 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Interactive Map Walking Problem Spots “Need signage and wayfinding to connect to Cedar River trail” (#1) “No sidewalk for kids walking to school (Maplewood)” (#40) “No Crosswalks ‐ Dangerous Intersection” (#28) “Lack of sidewalks” (#19) 12 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT On‐Line Questionnaire Barriers to Biking: 1. Motor vehicles travel too fast 2. Too many motor vehicles 3. No bicycle facilities (e.g. paved shoulders, bike lanes, shared use trails) Biking Improvements Needed: 340 Responses 1. Safer street intersections 2. Off‐street paved shared use paths 3. Calm residential streets that are designated and designed for biking (aka “Greenways” or “Bicycle Boulevards”) 13 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT On‐Line Questionnaire Barriers to Walking: 1. Discontinuous or missing sidewalks 2. I have to walk or run along a road 3. Crossing the street is dangerous or difficult Walking Improvements Needed: 1. More sidewalks 2. Safer road intersections 3. More paved shared use trails 4. Safer trail crossings at roads 14 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Do You Bicycle in Renton? 15 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Why Do You Walk? 16 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Where Do You Walk? 17 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Which Trails Do You Walk or Run? 18 PLAN COMPONENTS Demand and Needs Analysis • A demand/needs analysis will be completed to obtain state plan certification and meet grant eligibility requirements. • Analysis takes inventory work and public involvement into consideration, balancing public demand with Renton’s capacity. 19 PLAN COMPONENTS Demand and Needs Analysis Need Criteria • Participation Levels • Anticipated change based on Trends • Capacity of Current Inventory Common Themes • Access issues • Public Satisfaction • Regional Trail Connections • No Equestrian • May Creek Trail Demand Criteria • Sam Chastain Trail • Crosswalks and Sidewalks • Demand for Expansion of and Connection to Existing Facilities • Demand for new Facilities • Demand for Improved Facilities 20 Level of Traffic Stress ̴150 lbs… Strong and Fearless! ̴2500 lbs! Level of Stress 4 Level of Stress 1 21 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives Eastside Rail Corridor Trail 22 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives Eastside Rail Corridor Trail Lake to Sound Trail 23 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives Eastside Rail Corridor Trail Lake to Sound Trail Cedar River Trail 24 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives Eastside Rail Corridor Trail Lake to Sound Trail Cedar River Trail Green River Trail Interurban Trail Soos Creek Trail 25 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives Eastside Rail Corridor Trail Lake to Sound Trail City Center Cedar River Trail Green River Trail Interurban Trail Soos Creek Trail 26 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Regional Trail Alternatives 27 PLAN COMPONENTS Network Hierarchy Legend Regional Trails Alternatives (Existing) (Proposed) Neighborhood Backbone Routes Intra‐Neighborhood Connections Soft Surface Trails 28 PLAN COMPONENTS Facility Types – Neighborhood Greenway 29 KEY CONSIDERATIONS Facility Types –Protected Bike Lanes 30 PLAN COMPONENTS Potentially Critical Intersections 31 PLAN COMPONENTS Intersection Improvements 32 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION & PRIORITIZATIONS DRAFT Prioritization Criteria Connectivity & AccessibilitySafety & Trail Experience Equity Economy & the Community Implementation 33 Next Steps • King County Meeting #2 …………………October 24, 2017 • TAC Meeting #3……………………………November 16, 2017 • Open House Meeting #3…………….. November 28, 2017 34 Questions? 35.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder
    Burke-Gilman Trail Elliott Bay Trail Snoqualmie Valley Trail Interurban Trail (North) Cedar River Trail he Regional Trails System in King County contains over 40 unique trails offering some 300 miles of distinc- tive greenways and off-street routes that allow travel from the Puget Sound to the Surface and Grade Soft-surface with a gentle grade that Surface and Grade Paved with a flat grade, follows follows the route of the historic Milwaukee Road railroad with Surface and Grade Paved with a gentle grade, follows Surface and Grade Paved for its first 12 miles until Cascade Mountains. Defined primarily by the route of the historic Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern a 2.5-mile on-street detour around the Snoqualmie Mill site. the route of the historic Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway intersecting the Green-to-Cedar Rivers Trail and continues wide, paved trails or hard gravel paths Railway along Lake Union and Lake Washington. Surface and Grade Paved and flat, with a separate Length 31 miles, travels through the Snoqualmie Valley that operated in the early part of the 20th Century. as a soft-surface trail for its last 5 miles to Landsburg Park. Length 20 miles, stretches from Seattle to Bothell and pedestrian walking path that follows the trail through from Duvall to North Bend and on to Rattlesnake Lake Length 5 miles, links Seattle and Shoreline north to Length 17 miles, follows the gentle grade of the historic with gentle grades, they are perfect op- links with the Sammamish River Trail forming part of the Myrtle Edwards Park.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting
    AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting 3:30 PM - Monday, August 13, 2018 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal a) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. 2. Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study a) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. 3. Vouchers a) Accounts Payable b) Benefits' Deductions c) Payroll (located in Dropbox) 4. Emerging Issues in Finance AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Draft Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
    EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL DRAFT MASTER PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KING COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION FEBRUARY 2016 Dear Friends: In our rapidly developing region, we are fortunate to be able to preserve the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) in public ownership from Renton to Snohomish. The regional vision for the ERC is to develop a multi-use corridor that enhances mobility and connectivity, supports utility infrastructure needs, and provides recreational opportunities. Within this broader vision, the ERC offers a unique opportunity to create a nonmotorized (regional trail) connection between many vibrant, growing, and dynamic areas, providing a safe and enjoyable recreational experience for people of all ages and abilities and promoting healthy, livable communities. One day, it’s possible this corridor may connect from Vancouver WA to Vancouver BC. The intent is to develop a regional trail in the 15.6 miles of ERC under its ownership and the 1.1 miles of ERC owned by Sound Transit in which the County holds a trail easement that does not preclude future transit or utility use of the ERC, while meeting the following objectives: Connect Eastside communities by linking to: o Existing and planned regional and local trails o Transit centers, park and rides, and East Link light rail stations o Residential, commercial, and business centers Provide nonmotorized active transportation options and expand recreational opportunities to: o Benefit public health o Improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions o Expand access for underserved areas of King County Incorporate Eastside heritage and culture Support opportunities for economic development This Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is an important first step towards planning, environmental review, design, and construction of a regional trail in the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Summary Report
    Regional Transit Long-Range Plan Update Scoping Summary Report February 2014 Scoping Summary Report Contents 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 Purpose of Report ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3 Long-Range Plan Update Process ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4 Scoping Process Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4.1 Public notices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 4.2 Public scoping meetings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 4.3 Agency scoping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 4.4 Other outreach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 4.5 Comment opportunities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5 Summary of Comments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.1 Overview of comments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.2 Comments from agencies, tribes, and jurisdictions ---------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.1 Washington State Department of Ecology ----------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Map of High Conservation Values Properties in King County
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 405 ! ! ! ¨¦§ Paradise ! ! ! 52A2 ! Lake ST Lake ! Eastside Natural Snoqualmie Valley ! ! Stossel Creek ! ! Rail Woodinville Area Trail Site Forest ! ! ! Forest Corridor ! ! Kenmore Cottage ! Bothell Hollywood Hills Cold Creek ! ! ! Lake Park Equestrian Park Natural Area ! Park ! ! ! Snoqualmie Forest ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Upper ! Sammamish ! ! ! Bear Creek River Gold Creek Burke Gilman Eastside Bassett Pond ! Natural Area ! ! Park ! Trail Rail Corridor Trail Natural Area Tolt Pipeline Trail ! ! ! ! Ring Hill Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    CULTURAL RESOURCES EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN PROJECT FEBRUARY 2016 The Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Master Plan Project develops a baseline inventory and planning guidelines for portions of the Eastside Rail Corridor owned by King County and Sound Transit. A variety of uses is possible for the corridor in the future, and various agencies and jurisdictions have ownership interests in the corridor. This document is an internal work product supporting a study for future development of a shared use trail in the corridor. For more information please visit the King County Parks Eastside Rail Corridor – Regional Trail webpage at: http://www.kingcounty.gov/erc King County Parks. 2016. Eastside Rail Corridor – Regional Trail Master Plan Project Cultural Resources. Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks. Prepared by: ESA, Alicia Valentino and Katherine F. Wilson. Seattle, Washington, February 2016. EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR - REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN PROJECT FEBRUARY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Master Plan Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 On-Railbed and Off-Railbed Alternatives ..................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilburton and the ERC 22
    Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Context Maps 6 Assets 6 Income 8 Constraints 9 Literature Review 10 Methodology 11 Case Studies 13 Retail 13 Restaurants 15 Breweries 17 Best Practices 20 SWOT Analysis of Wilburton and the ERC 22 Areas of Interests: 23 Trestle, SE 5th street 23 Road Crossing of the ERC and SE 1st St. 26 ERC crossing NE 4th St. 28 ERC North of Wilburton Light Rail Station (above NE 8th St.) 30 Recommendations: 32 Tactical Urbanism: 1 day - 1 year 32 Adaptive Reuse: 1-5 years 34 Long-Term Development: 5-15 years 36 Works Cited: Chicago Style 39 1 Executive Summary As the Eastside Rail Corridor bike trail is built, this new urban form of transit offers new opportunities for sustainability, innovation, and quality of life in Bellevue’s Wilburton and Bel-Red neighborhoods. Like Transit-Oriented Development, trail-oriented development involves focusing/targeting new businesses, community spaces, and public projects in areas adjacent to, near, and otherwise accessible from trail infrastructure. This offers residents, employees, owners, entrepreneurs, and customers more freedom to choose how they travel, and will lead to more interaction, use, and stimulation, and improvement in the local economy and community. We examine a series of case studies from other cities to interpret their experiences with trail-oriented development and to draw insight from the benefits and costs observed there and apply these lessons to Bellevue’s unique situation. When moving forward in the quarter, we dove into the case studies, gathering important information as to how Bellevue can apply different methods to the ERC.
    [Show full text]
  • WWRP Grants 2019-2021
    Grants Awarded Critical Habitat Category Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2019-2021 Project Number and Applicant Rank Score Type1 Project Name Grant Applicant Grant Request Match Total Grant Awarded 1 44.29 18-1334A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 41.14 18-1452A Spiva Butte Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $341,900 $344,900 $686,800 $341,900 3 38.86 18-1277A Mount Adams Klickitat Canyon Phase 3 Columbia Land Trust $3,000,000 $4,232,900 $7,232,900 $3,000,000 4 38.14 18-1358A Oregon Spotted Frog Conservation Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 5 37.86 18-1371C Cashmere Canyon Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $977,426 $2,061,331 $3,038,757 $977,426 6 36.57 18-1333A South Sound Prairies Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 7 32.71 18-1791A Twisp Uplands Conservation Easements Methow Conservancy $2,056,622 $2,056,622 $4,113,244 $427,319 2 8 32.29 18-1336A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,235,000 $4,235,000 Alternate 9 29.14 18-1340A Goat Mountain Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $155,000 $155,000 Alternate 10 28.43 18-1357A Hoffstadt Hills Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Alternate $21,865,948 $8,695,753 $30,561,701 $12,846,645 1Project Types: A=Acquisition C=Combination 2Partial funding Recreation and Conservation Funding Board Resolution 2019-24 Preliminary Ranking Critical Habitat Projects Washington Wildlife and Recreation
    [Show full text]
  • Central Puget Sound Regional Open Space Strategy
    A Regional Open Space Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region DECEMBER 2016 Regional Open Space Strategy (ROSS) UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON UW Green Futures Research & Design Lab A Regional Open Space Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region December 2016 Prepared by: Regional Open Space Strategy (ROSS) Project Staff University of Washington Green Futures Research and Design Lab 242 Gould Hall Seattle, WA 98195 206-685-0521 www.openspacepugetsound.org Co-Directors: Nancy Rottle, RLA, FASLA, Green Futures Research and Design Lab John Owen, AIA, MAKERS Architecture and Urban Design Digital versions of this report and its full appendices can be downloaded from the project website: openspacepugetsound.org This report was prepared with the generous support of: The Bullitt Foundation http://www.bullitt.org The Russell Family Foundation http://www.trff.org/ This report and its appendices have been developed by the UW Green Futures Lab Regional Open Space Strategy staff, its project partners, and volunteer contributors over the course of six years, 2010- 2016. This report should not be considered an agreement by its funders, members of the Executive Committee, or project contributors. It is hoped that the research, proposed strategies, and planning tools contained herein will support creation of a conserved and enhanced open space system for our region. Professional staff and partners during the project’s life have been: ROSS PROFESSIONAL TEAM PARTNERS Resource Media UW GREEN FUTURES LAB STAFF Brendan McLaughlin Nancy Rottle, ROSS Co-Director Gregory Heller John Owen, ROSS Co-Director Marcela Gara Ikuno Masterson, Sr. Planner Jeffrey W. Raker, Sr. Planner Earth Economics Jonathan Childers, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Connections
    PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The legislation that established the Regional Advisory Council (RAC) described several expectations for the group’s work, including • Coordinate planning and development activities to the extent possible to ensure effective use of the southern portion of the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) and the Redmond Spur. • Oversee the partner planning process including implementing and coordinating the trail, high-capacity transit, and utility uses in the ERC. • Coordinating with affected cities around local planning and development. • Address both near-term and long-term recommendations. • Recommend any needed changes to the county’s countywide planning policies. • Reach out to a broad spectrum of stakeholders. This report provides a summary of the RAC’s work to accomplish those objectives, and identifies actions necessary to continue this collaborative approach among the owners. The report begins by describing the RAC’s vision for the corridor, the history of the ERC, and the process used by the RAC to develop these recommendations. In the subsequent chapters the report • Details the current conditions in the corridor, broken into five planning segments. It describes current uses adjacent to the corridor, the major constraints that will need to be resolved (pinch points, steep slopes, narrow trestles, etc.), opportunities for connections (trails, high-capacity transit, parks, utility corridors, etc.), and any significant plans of neighboring communities that could impact the corridor. • Presents several Principles developed by the RAC to guide more detailed recommendations. • Makes recommendations divided into several sections: Creation of a regional legacy for future generations, outlining plans to promote the corridor as a regional spine for mobility and economic development, be developed to capture local culture, history, and scenic values, and reflect the values of public health, public safety, equity and social justice, and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Transportation Plan Appendix a Regional Bicycle Network Maps
    Active Transportation Plan Appendix A Regional Bicycle Network Maps and Gap List Regional Bicycle Network Development Map Series KEY by SMART Corridors West Snohomish 2 East Snohomish 2 East Snohomish 1 West Snohomish 1 North Eastside Kitsap NW King King 1 NE King 1 SW Eastside South Kitsap King 1 King 2 and Vashon Island SE King 1 SW West King 2 SE King 2 Pierce 1 West Pierce 2 East Pierce 1 East Pierce 2 H T E 204TH 7 2 4 204TH 04T 8 H B K PINE PC-44-b 0 E NELSON A KT-3 T L 1 H D H - D Y Y S T ELLISPORT O E 1 E E N R G L 1 O E 3 N N E 1 B V 2 T N R W D D E 1 I U I N A I N T S S R E C S E K T L M L Y E L S E U G L Y E I L 220 TH N L H W O A K 1 H 60 TH M V D K T C N T 6 2 O T N 6 6 H C - E H G T A 1 C T 4 O E Y S 0 4 1 P O 9 D E T 232ND - D R R d S H R 1 PC U C -44-d T 3 ²³ P PC I -44- 7 c C 1 0 S H 6 144TH 1 S 1 I G H O Y L T L D R E 8 B L M S 1 A L T Highline 1 N H A H Kent DesMoines P&R T V P H G 4 I H T A Community College SR 3 5 02 C L T R N N H L 4 *# E S W T - O 9 T 8 4 C R T 1 128TH 4 S O K 1 E M C - N R CREVISTO a O L C D L I D H O H T C 4 K H K T 3 WO T ODHILL C S 1 6 1 O 2 3 1 C S 1 A A S I L 112TH E L U P H B S D N T R T 0 I N E 7 L 2 H N R L E 2 G E O 1 I P M M N H R S Y A S EHMEL Y O E C 100TH A E W R I K H C M L N C S O A L A B A B H M A A J U Y OLSON V V T P V I R E U W A N LRT 272nd Station T H H HALL C B H N T A 6 E D M 92ND C 94TH 8 B C N U u S 2 J s A h 8 HN C E UG m I R VA C H Y H a T C SOU E n ²³ K H C S T H T r A H R a A 6 L T i R l 8 E 1 Talehquah Ferry Terminal L 6 B A 6 O D 6 SE R H O ROSEDALE E V S R I I K
    [Show full text]
  • Social Elements, Public Services and Utilities Technical
    I-405, Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project (I-5 to SR 169 – Phase 2) SOCIAL ELEMENTS, PUBLIC !"`$ AÌ SERVICES AND UTILITIES AÐ TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Bothell December 2007 AÊ Aô %&e( Kirkland Aí AÉ Lake Washington Bellevue !"b$ Newcastle !"`$ %&e( Aá Renton Project Area Aç Tukwila Aí Aæ AÅ { 0 2 Miles TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary .....................................................................................................................................................1 Neighborhoods and Community Cohesion.......................................................................................2 Parks and Trails .....................................................................................................................................3 Public Services and Utilities.................................................................................................................3 Displacements ........................................................................................................................................3 Circulation and Public Safety...............................................................................................................4 Avoidance and Minimization Measures ............................................................................................4 Project Description.....................................................................................................................................6 Build Alternative....................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]