DOCSLIB.ORG

Link Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Link Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility LINK LIGHT RAIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SATELLITE FACILITY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX E.4 Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Report May 2014 Washington State Department of Transportation CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY SOUND TRANSIT LINK OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SATELLITE FACILITY HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT P REPARED FOR: Sound Transit Union Station 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 Contact: Kent Hale, Senior Environmental Planner (206) 398-5103 P REPARED BY: Christopher Hetzel, MA and J. Tait Elder, MA ICF International 710 Second Avenue, Suite 550 Seattle, WA 98104 Contact: Christopher Hetzel (206) 801-2825 May 2014 Christopher Hetzel and J. Tait Elder. 2014. Sound Transit Link Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Report. May. (ICF 00329.12.) Seattle, WA. Prepared for Sound Transit, Seattle, WA. Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... v Page Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 No Build Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Build Alternatives .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 Chapter 2 Project Background ......................................................................................................... 2-1 Personnel ............................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Area of Potential Effects and Study Area ............................................................................................ 2-1 Regulatory Context .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Federal ........................................................................................................................................ 2-12 State ............................................................................................................................................ 2-14 Local ............................................................................................................................................ 2-16 Agency and Tribal Consultation ......................................................................................................... 2-16 Chapter 3 Environmental and Cultural Setting .................................................................................. 3-1 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 Geologic Background .................................................................................................................... 3-1 Flora and Fauna............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................................................... 3-2 Precontact ..................................................................................................................................... 3-2 Ethnography and Ethnohistory ..................................................................................................... 3-3 Historical Context ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 Lynnwood ...................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Bellevue ......................................................................................................................................... 3-8 Chapter 4 Literature Review ............................................................................................................ 4-1 Lynnwood Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Lynnwood Alternative Site ............................................................................................................ 4-1 BNSF Alternative .................................................................................................................................. 4-4 BNSF Modified Alternative .................................................................................................................. 4-7 SR 520 Alternative ............................................................................................................................... 4-7 Chapter 5 Research Design .............................................................................................................. 5-1 Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Report May 2014 Link Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility i Draft Environmental Impact Statement Objectives ............................................................................................................................................ 5-1 Archaeological Expectations................................................................................................................ 5-1 Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 5-2 Research Methods ........................................................................................................................ 5-2 Field Methods ............................................................................................................................... 5-3 Chapter 6 Results ............................................................................................................................ 6-1 Lynnwood Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 6-1 Archaeological Resources ............................................................................................................. 6-1 Historic Resources ......................................................................................................................... 6-3 BNSF Alternative ................................................................................................................................ 6-10 Archaeological Resources ........................................................................................................... 6-10 Historic Resources ....................................................................................................................... 6-12 BNSF Modified Alternative ................................................................................................................ 6-15 Archaeological Resources ........................................................................................................... 6-15 Historic Resources ....................................................................................................................... 6-17 SR 520 Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 6-19 Archaeological Resources ........................................................................................................... 6-19 Historic Resources ....................................................................................................................... 6-21 Chapter 7 Impacts Analysis .............................................................................................................. 7-1 Impacts Common to All Build Alternatives .......................................................................................... 7-1 No Build Alternative ............................................................................................................................ 7-2 Lynnwood Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 7-3 BNSF Alternative .................................................................................................................................. 7-3 BNSF Modified Alternative .................................................................................................................. 7-3 SR 520 Alternative ............................................................................................................................... 7-3 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERITAGE REFLECTOR March 2013 Volume XIII Issue I
    HERITAGE REFLECTOR March 2013 Volume XIII Issue I Vision To be a destination heritage Something to ‘cluck’ about! museum and research facility that enhances Jane Morton excited about community identity Education Coordinator the possibility through the preservation of having a and stewardship of the Thanks to the vision of both similar hands- Eastside’s history. Stu Vander Hoek and Tim on activity Johnson, Eastside Heritage right here in Mission Center now has its very own Bellevue. interactive chicken coop To steward Eastside history complete with faux chickens Tim called by actively collecting, and wooden eggs! the Museum preserving, and interpreting Curator in documents and artifacts, This will be a perfect addition Colorado and by promoting public to our farm activities both at for further involvement in and KidsQuest Children’s Museum information appreciation of and Kelsey Creek Fraser Cabin. and then built this heritage through Kids will be able to collect eggs EHC our very are kept with nest boxes for educational programming in baskets, weigh them, and see own modified version with a egg-laying. The number of and community outreach. how much they were worth in roof and the ability to travel! small coops in urban areas the late 1880s. What could you He purchased an antique egg has been growing with many buy from selling your eggs? scale; got the wooden eggs families enjoying fresh eggs from a company in Texas; each day! and the stuffed chickens from In this a company in Snohomish The EHC chicken coop will (websites are so helpful!) make its debut at the April 18th “Farm Life” event at KidsQuest Tim also figured out a way for Issue Children’s Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder
    Burke-Gilman Trail Elliott Bay Trail Snoqualmie Valley Trail Interurban Trail (North) Cedar River Trail he Regional Trails System in King County contains over 40 unique trails offering some 300 miles of distinc- tive greenways and off-street routes that allow travel from the Puget Sound to the Surface and Grade Soft-surface with a gentle grade that Surface and Grade Paved with a flat grade, follows follows the route of the historic Milwaukee Road railroad with Surface and Grade Paved with a gentle grade, follows Surface and Grade Paved for its first 12 miles until Cascade Mountains. Defined primarily by the route of the historic Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern a 2.5-mile on-street detour around the Snoqualmie Mill site. the route of the historic Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway intersecting the Green-to-Cedar Rivers Trail and continues wide, paved trails or hard gravel paths Railway along Lake Union and Lake Washington. Surface and Grade Paved and flat, with a separate Length 31 miles, travels through the Snoqualmie Valley that operated in the early part of the 20th Century. as a soft-surface trail for its last 5 miles to Landsburg Park. Length 20 miles, stretches from Seattle to Bothell and pedestrian walking path that follows the trail through from Duvall to North Bend and on to Rattlesnake Lake Length 5 miles, links Seattle and Shoreline north to Length 17 miles, follows the gentle grade of the historic with gentle grades, they are perfect op- links with the Sammamish River Trail forming part of the Myrtle Edwards Park.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting
    AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting 3:30 PM - Monday, August 13, 2018 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal a) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. 2. Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study a) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. 3. Vouchers a) Accounts Payable b) Benefits' Deductions c) Payroll (located in Dropbox) 4. Emerging Issues in Finance AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Draft Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
    EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL DRAFT MASTER PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KING COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION FEBRUARY 2016 Dear Friends: In our rapidly developing region, we are fortunate to be able to preserve the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) in public ownership from Renton to Snohomish. The regional vision for the ERC is to develop a multi-use corridor that enhances mobility and connectivity, supports utility infrastructure needs, and provides recreational opportunities. Within this broader vision, the ERC offers a unique opportunity to create a nonmotorized (regional trail) connection between many vibrant, growing, and dynamic areas, providing a safe and enjoyable recreational experience for people of all ages and abilities and promoting healthy, livable communities. One day, it’s possible this corridor may connect from Vancouver WA to Vancouver BC. The intent is to develop a regional trail in the 15.6 miles of ERC under its ownership and the 1.1 miles of ERC owned by Sound Transit in which the County holds a trail easement that does not preclude future transit or utility use of the ERC, while meeting the following objectives: Connect Eastside communities by linking to: o Existing and planned regional and local trails o Transit centers, park and rides, and East Link light rail stations o Residential, commercial, and business centers Provide nonmotorized active transportation options and expand recreational opportunities to: o Benefit public health o Improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions o Expand access for underserved areas of King County Incorporate Eastside heritage and culture Support opportunities for economic development This Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is an important first step towards planning, environmental review, design, and construction of a regional trail in the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History Project Catalogue
    1 A Tribute to the Eastside “Words of Wisdom - Voices of the Past” An Oral History Project Catalogue Two 2 FORWARD Oral History Resource Catalogue (2016 Edition) Eastside Heritage Center has hundreds of oral histories in our permanent collection, containing hours of history from all around East King County. Both Bellevue Historical Society and Marymoor Museum had active oral history programs, and EHC has continued that trend, adding new interviews to the collection. Between 1996 and 2003, Eastside Heritage Center (formerly Bellevue Historical Society) was engaged in an oral history project entitled “Words of Wisdom – Voices of the Past.” As a part of that project, Eastside Heritage Center produced the first Oral History Resource Catalogue. The Catalogue is a reference guide for researchers and staff. It provides a brief introduction to each of the interviews collected during “Words of Wisdom.” The entries contain basic information about the interview date, length, recording format and participants, as well as a brief biography of the narrator, and a list of the topics discussed. Our second catalogue is a continuation of this project, and now includes some interviews collected prior to 1996. The oral history collection at the Eastside Heritage Center is constantly expanding, and the Catalogue will grow as more interviews are collected and as older interviews are transcribed. Special thanks to our narrators, interviewers, transcribers and all those who contributed their memories of the Eastside. We are indebted to 4Culture for funding this project. Eastside Heritage Center Oral History Committee 3 Table of Contents Forward and Acknowledgments pg. 2 Narrators Richard Bennett, with Helen Bennett Johnson pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Summary Report
    Regional Transit Long-Range Plan Update Scoping Summary Report February 2014 Scoping Summary Report Contents 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 Purpose of Report ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3 Long-Range Plan Update Process ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4 Scoping Process Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4.1 Public notices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 4.2 Public scoping meetings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 4.3 Agency scoping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 4.4 Other outreach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 4.5 Comment opportunities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5 Summary of Comments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.1 Overview of comments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.2 Comments from agencies, tribes, and jurisdictions ---------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.1 Washington State Department of Ecology ----------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Map of High Conservation Values Properties in King County
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 405 ! ! ! ¨¦§ Paradise ! ! ! 52A2 ! Lake ST Lake ! Eastside Natural Snoqualmie Valley ! ! Stossel Creek ! ! Rail Woodinville Area Trail Site Forest ! ! ! Forest Corridor ! ! Kenmore Cottage ! Bothell Hollywood Hills Cold Creek ! ! ! Lake Park Equestrian Park Natural Area ! Park ! ! ! Snoqualmie Forest ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Upper ! Sammamish ! ! ! Bear Creek River Gold Creek Burke Gilman Eastside Bassett Pond ! Natural Area ! ! Park ! Trail Rail Corridor Trail Natural Area Tolt Pipeline Trail ! ! ! ! Ring Hill Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Arts & Culture
    CITY OF BELLEVUE GRAND arts & culture Planning and Community Development July 11, 2017 Special Meeting “The arts are an important expression of how people think of and experience the city and each other. Bellevue seeks to foster a strong arts and cultural community chiefly supported through a wide range of artists, art and cultural institutions, and arts groups offering a variety experiences to an engaged audience.” -City of Bellevue, Comprehensive Plan, Urban Design & the Arts Element A g e n d a Tuesday, July 11, 2017 Bellevue Arts Commission Meeting: 4:30 p.m. Bellevue City Hall, 1E-109 Commission Staff Contact: 425.452.4105 1. CALL TO ORDER 4:30 Chair Manfredi will call the meeting to order. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES 4:30 – 4:35 A. Chair Manfredi will ask for approval of the agenda. B. Chair Manfredi will ask for approval of the June 2017 regular meeting minutes. 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 4:35 – 4:40 Chair Manfredi will entertain oral communications limited to three minutes per person or five minutes if representing the official position of a recognized community organization for other than main agenda items and public hearing subject. A maximum of three people are permitted to speak to each side of any one topic. 4. ACTION ITEMS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Grand Connection Briefing 4:40 – 5:10 B. Draft Grand Connection Art & Cultural Element 5:10 – 5:55 C. Bellevue Creative Edge update 5:55 – 6:10 5. COMMISSION QUICK BUSINESS 6:10 – 6:15 6. REPORTS 6:15 – 6:20 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Avenue Trail Transitions to On- Street Bike Lanes
    PROJECT REVIEW Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Project Review • Update to the 2009 Plan • Update to new development and current planning efforts • Collaborate with King County on regional trail connections • Incorporate new facility types and preferred routes • Maintain eligibility for grant funding 2 PROJECT REVIEW Goals Goal A: Improving safety Improve safety for non‐motorized use and facilities. Goal B: Creating an accessible and connected system. Develop an inter‐connected trail network. Goal C: Promoting physical and environmental health. Improve the health of the community through sustainable design and increase the rates of walking, running and bicycling. Goal D: Achieving equity Ensure that all members of the community have equal access to walking and bicycling facilities. Goal E: Enhancing the economy and community Enhance the economy and vibrancy of the community by increasing walking and bicycling. 3 PROJECT REVIEW Schedule 2017 2018 May June July August September October November December January February Meetings and Public C S P S P C S P C C Events Project TAC Meeting Open House TAC Meeting Open House Project TAC Meeting Open House Draft Plan Plan Introduction #1 Meeting #1 #2 Meeting #2 Update #3 Meeting #3 Presentation Adoption Interactive Map and Survey Draft Master Plan Final Master Plan 4 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #1 Eastside Rail Corridor Alignment “Preferred alignment along Houser Way” “Houser Way is a good potential trail route from Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park to the Cedar River Trail. Houser Way
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    CULTURAL RESOURCES EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN PROJECT FEBRUARY 2016 The Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Master Plan Project develops a baseline inventory and planning guidelines for portions of the Eastside Rail Corridor owned by King County and Sound Transit. A variety of uses is possible for the corridor in the future, and various agencies and jurisdictions have ownership interests in the corridor. This document is an internal work product supporting a study for future development of a shared use trail in the corridor. For more information please visit the King County Parks Eastside Rail Corridor – Regional Trail webpage at: http://www.kingcounty.gov/erc King County Parks. 2016. Eastside Rail Corridor – Regional Trail Master Plan Project Cultural Resources. Prepared for: King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks. Prepared by: ESA, Alicia Valentino and Katherine F. Wilson. Seattle, Washington, February 2016. EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR - REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN PROJECT FEBRUARY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Master Plan Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 On-Railbed and Off-Railbed Alternatives ..................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilburton and the ERC 22
    Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Context Maps 6 Assets 6 Income 8 Constraints 9 Literature Review 10 Methodology 11 Case Studies 13 Retail 13 Restaurants 15 Breweries 17 Best Practices 20 SWOT Analysis of Wilburton and the ERC 22 Areas of Interests: 23 Trestle, SE 5th street 23 Road Crossing of the ERC and SE 1st St. 26 ERC crossing NE 4th St. 28 ERC North of Wilburton Light Rail Station (above NE 8th St.) 30 Recommendations: 32 Tactical Urbanism: 1 day - 1 year 32 Adaptive Reuse: 1-5 years 34 Long-Term Development: 5-15 years 36 Works Cited: Chicago Style 39 1 Executive Summary As the Eastside Rail Corridor bike trail is built, this new urban form of transit offers new opportunities for sustainability, innovation, and quality of life in Bellevue’s Wilburton and Bel-Red neighborhoods. Like Transit-Oriented Development, trail-oriented development involves focusing/targeting new businesses, community spaces, and public projects in areas adjacent to, near, and otherwise accessible from trail infrastructure. This offers residents, employees, owners, entrepreneurs, and customers more freedom to choose how they travel, and will lead to more interaction, use, and stimulation, and improvement in the local economy and community. We examine a series of case studies from other cities to interpret their experiences with trail-oriented development and to draw insight from the benefits and costs observed there and apply these lessons to Bellevue’s unique situation. When moving forward in the quarter, we dove into the case studies, gathering important information as to how Bellevue can apply different methods to the ERC.
    [Show full text]
  • WWRP Grants 2019-2021
    Grants Awarded Critical Habitat Category Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2019-2021 Project Number and Applicant Rank Score Type1 Project Name Grant Applicant Grant Request Match Total Grant Awarded 1 44.29 18-1334A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 41.14 18-1452A Spiva Butte Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $341,900 $344,900 $686,800 $341,900 3 38.86 18-1277A Mount Adams Klickitat Canyon Phase 3 Columbia Land Trust $3,000,000 $4,232,900 $7,232,900 $3,000,000 4 38.14 18-1358A Oregon Spotted Frog Conservation Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 5 37.86 18-1371C Cashmere Canyon Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $977,426 $2,061,331 $3,038,757 $977,426 6 36.57 18-1333A South Sound Prairies Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 7 32.71 18-1791A Twisp Uplands Conservation Easements Methow Conservancy $2,056,622 $2,056,622 $4,113,244 $427,319 2 8 32.29 18-1336A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,235,000 $4,235,000 Alternate 9 29.14 18-1340A Goat Mountain Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $155,000 $155,000 Alternate 10 28.43 18-1357A Hoffstadt Hills Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Alternate $21,865,948 $8,695,753 $30,561,701 $12,846,645 1Project Types: A=Acquisition C=Combination 2Partial funding Recreation and Conservation Funding Board Resolution 2019-24 Preliminary Ranking Critical Habitat Projects Washington Wildlife and Recreation
    [Show full text]