DOCSLIB.ORG

Periodicals and Recurring Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Periodicals and Recurring Documents PERIODICALS AND RECURRING DOCUMENTS May 2012 Legend A ANNUAL S-M SEMI-MONTHLY D DAILY BI-M BI-MONTHLY W WEEKLY Q QUARTERLY BI-W BI-WEEKLY TRI-A TRI-ANNUAL M MONTHLY IRR IRREGULAR S-A SEMI-ANNUAL A ACADEME. (BI-M) 1985-1989 ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE. PROCEEDINGS. (IRR) 1960-1991 (MFILM 1975-1980) (MFICHE 1981-1982) ACQUISITION REVIEW QUARTERLY. (Q) 1994-2003 CONTINUED BY DEFENSE ACQUISITION REVIEW JOURNAL. AD ASTRA-TO THE STARS. (M) 1989-1992 ADA. (Q) 1991-1997 FORMERLY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. ADF: AFRICA DEFENSE FORUM. (Q) 2008- ADVANCE. (A) 1986-1994 ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. SEE S.A.M. ADVANCED MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. ADVISOR. (Q) 1974-1978 FORMERLY JOURNAL OF NAVY CIVILIAN MANPOWER MANAGEMENT. ADVOCATE. (BI-M) 1982-1984 - 1 - AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1977-1978 CONTINUED BY AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. AEI FOREIGN POLICY AND DEFENSE REVIEW. (BI-M) 1979-1986 FORMERLY AEI DEFENSE REVIEW. AEROSPACE. (Q) 1963-1987 AEROSPACE AMERICA. (M) 1984-1998 FORMERLY ASTRONAUTICS & AERONAUTICS. AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE SCIENCE. (Q) 1990-1991 FORMERLY DEFENSE SCIENCE. AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. (Q) 1965-1988 FORMERLY AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. CONTINUED BY AIR POWER HISTORY. AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL. (BI-M) 1967-1981 FORMERLY AIR FORCE SPACE DIGEST INTERNATIONAL. AEROSPACE MEDICINE. (M) 1973-1974 CONTINUED BY AVIATION SPACE AND EVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE. AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL. (Q) 1999-2002 FORMERLY AIRPOWER JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL. AEROSPACE SAFETY. (M) 1976-1980 AFRICA REPORT. (BI-M) 1967-1995 (MFICHE 1979-1994) AFRICA TODAY. (Q) 1963-1990; (MFICHE 1979-1990) 1999-2007 AFRICAN SECURITY. (Q) 2010- AGENDA. (M) 1978-1982 AGORA. (Q) 2008- AGORA/SPANISH EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current - 2 - AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL. (Q) 2002- FORMERLY AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL/ARABIC EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL/CHINESE EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL/FRENCH EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL/PORTUGUESE EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current AIR & SPACE POWER JOURNAL/SPANISH EDITION. (Q) 2 years + current AIR AND SPACE SMITHSONIAN. (BI-M) 1996- AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. (BI-M) 1983-1990 FORMERLY AIR DEFENSE MAGAZINE. CONTINUED BY ADA. AIR DEFENSE MAGAZINE. (Q) 1975-1982 CONTINUED BY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY. AIR DEFENSE TRENDS. (TRI-A) 1969-1974 AIR ENTHUSIAST. (M) 1971-1974 CONTINUED BY AIR INTERNATIONAL. AIR FORCE. (M) 1942-1959 (MFILM 1941-1945) CONTINUED BY AIR FORCE AND SPACE DIGEST. AIR FORCE AND SPACE DIGEST. (M) 1959-1971 FORMERLY AIR FORCE. CONTINUED BY AIR FORCE MAGAZINE. AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER. (Q) 1963-1975 CONTINUED BY AIR FORCE ENGINEERING AND SERVICES QUARTERLY. AIR FORCE COMPTROLLER. (Q) 1967-2004 AIR FORCE ENGINEERING & SERVICES QUARTERLY. (Q) 1975-1986 FORMERLY AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER. - 3 - AIR FORCE INFORMATION POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. (M) 1960-1964 CONTINUED BY AIR FORCE POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. AIR FORCE INFORMATION POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. 1961-1963 SUPPLEMENT. (M) CONTINUED BY AIR FORCE POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. SUPPLEMENT. AIR FORCE JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS. (Q) 1980- AIR FORCE LAW REVIEW. (S-A) 1974- 2001 FORMERLY UNITED STATES AIR FORCE JAG LAW REVIEW. AIR FORCE MAGAZINE. (M) 1971- FORMERLY AIR FORCE AND SPACE DIGEST. AIR FORCE POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. (S-M) 1965-1991 CONTINUED BY POLICY LETTER. FORMERLY AIR FORCE INFORMATION POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. AIR FORCE POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS SUPPL. (M) 1964-1981 FORMERLY AIR FORCE INFORMATION POLICY LETTER FOR COMMANDERS. SUPPLEMENT. AIR FORCE SPACE DIGEST INTERNATIONAL. (M) 1965-1966 CONTINUED BY AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL. AIR INTELLIGENCE TRAINING BULLETIN. (M) 1956-1963 AIR INTERNATIONAL. (M) 1974-1992 FORMERLY AIR ENTHUSIAST. AIR LAND BULLETIN. (Q) 1982-1992 CONTINUED BY AIR LAND SEA BULLETIN. AIR LAND SEA BULLETIN. (TRI-A) 1992-2011 FORMERLY AIR LAND BULLETIN. http://www.alsa.mil/alsb.html AIR POWER. (Q) 1953-1960 FORMERLY ROYAL AIR FORCE QUARTERLY. CONTINUED BY ROYAL AIR FORCES QUARTERLY. - 4 - AIR POWER HISTORIAN. (Q) 1957-1959 CONTINUED BY AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. AIR POWER HISTORY. (Q) 1989- FORMERLY AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. AIR SCOOP. (BI-M) 1977- AIR UNIVERSITY QUARTERLY REVIEW. (BI-M) 1947-1962 CONTINUED BY AIR UNIVERSITY REVIEW. AIR UNIVERSITY REVIEW. (BI-M) 1963-1987 FORMERLY AIR UNIVERSITY QUARTERLY REVIEW. CONTINUED BY THE AIRPOWER JOURNAL. AIR WAR COLLEGE SUPPLEMENT. (IRR) 1962-1969 AIRBORNE QUARTERLY. (Q) 1959-1967 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY. (3 X YR) 2 years + current AIRLIFT: THE JOURNAL OF THE AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1982-1991 SCHOOL. (Q) FORMERLY AIRLIFT OPERATIONS REVIEW. CONTINUED BY MAC FORUM. AIRLIFT OPERATIONS REVIEW. (Q) 1979-1982 CONTINUED BY AIRLIFT. AIRMAN: OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE U.S. AIR FORCE. (BI-M) 1957-2011 http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS1865 AIRPOWER HISTORIAN. (Q) 1959-1965 FORMERLY AIR POWER HISTORIAN. CONTINUED BY AEROSPACE HISTORIAN. AIRPOWER JOURNAL. (Q) 1987- 1999 FORMERLY AIR UNIVERSITY REVIEW. CONTINUED BY AEROSPACE POWER JOURNAL. ALL HANDS. (M) 1945-2011 http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS1610 - 5 - ALL VOLUNTEER. (M) 1979-1984 FORMERLY U.S. ARMY RECRUITING & CAREER COUNSELING JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY RECRUITER JOURNAL. ALTERNATIVES. (Q) 1979-1992 AMBASSADORS REVIEW. (S-A) 2001- AMBIO: A JOURNAL OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT, 1975-1983 RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT. (BI-M) AMERICAN-ARAB AFFAIRS. (Q) 1982-1991 CONTINUED BY MIDDLE EAST POLICY. AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND INDEX. (MF) 1994 only AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS. (BI-M) 2003- AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL. (M) 1946-1951 CONTINUED BY FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL. AMERICAN HERITAGE. (Q) 2001- AMERICAN HISTORY. (BI-M) 2009- AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL. (S-A) 1979- AMERICAN INTEREST. (6 X YR) 2007- AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION. (Q) 2001- AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. (Q) 1961-1988 AMERICAN JOURNALISM REVIEW: AJR. (Q) 2 years + current AMERICAN LIBRARIES. (10 X YR) 5 years + current AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW. (Q) 1967-1990 (MFICHE 1979-1990) AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL. (Q) 1947-1961 CONTINUED BY NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL. AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE REVIEW. (S-A) 1983-1994 - 6 - ANTARCTIC JOURNAL OF THE UNITED STATES. (Q) 1966-1996 (MFICHE 1975-1990) http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS2781 1996- ANTIAIRCRAFT JOURNAL. (BI-M) 1948-1954 APPLIED LANGUAGE LEARNING. (S-A) 1994- APPROACH. (BI-M) 1994-1995; CONTINUED BY APPROACH MECH. 1997- APPROACH MECH. (BI-M) 1995-1996 CONTINUED BY APPROACH. ARAB PERSPECTIVES. (M) 1980-1986 ARCTIC. (IRR) 1948-1961 ARCTIC BULLETIN. (Q) 1973-1978 ARGUS. (M) 1969-1974 ARMADA INTERNATIONAL. (BI-M) 1978- ARMCHAIR GENERAL. (BI-M) 2009- ARMED FORCES. (M) 1983-1989 ARMED FORCES AND SOCIETY. (Q) 1974- ARMED FORCES CHEMICAL JOURNAL. (Q) 1946-1964 ARMED FORCES COMPTROLLER. (Q) 1968-2001 ARMED FORCES JOURNAL. (M) 1968-1976; FORMERLY JOURNAL OF THE ARMED FORCES. 2002- CONTINUED BY ARMED FORCES JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL. (MFILM 1972-1973) FORMERLY ARMED FORCES JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL. ARMED FORCES JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL. (M) 1976-2002 FORMERLY ARMED FORCES JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY ARMED FORCES JOURNAL. - 7 - ARMED FORCES MANAGEMENT. (M) 1954-1970 ARMED FORCES STAFF COLLEGE COMMUNIQUE. (Q) 1978-1992 CONTINUED BY COMMUNIQUE. ARMEES D'AUJOURD'HUI. (M) 1975-2003 ARMIES & WEAPONS. (BI-M) 1973-1979 CONTINUED BY GROUND DEFENCE INTERNATIONAL. ARMIES OF THE WORLD. (3 X YEAR) 1991 only CONTINUED BY HOW THEY FIGHT: ARMIES OF THE WORLD. ARMOR. (BI-M) 1950- FORMERLY ARMORED CAVALRY JOURNAL. ARMORED CAVALRY JOURNAL. 1947-1949 ARMS CONTROL REPORTER. (M) (REF JX 1973.A73) 1990-2006 ARMS CONTROL TODAY. (M) 1975- ARMY. (M) 1956- FORMERLY ARMY COMBAT FORCES JOURNAL. ARMY ADMINISTRATOR. (BI-M) 1976-1980 CONTINUED BY SOLDIER SUPPORT JOURNAL. ARMY AL&T. (Q) 2000- FORMERLY ARMY RD&A. ARMY AND NAVY JOURNAL. (W) 1937-1950 CONTINUED BY ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL. ARMY AND NAVY REGISTER. (W) 1941-1948 CONTINUED BY ARMY-NAVY-AIR FORCE REGISTER. ARMY AVIATION. (M) 1968- ARMY CHAPLAINCY. (IRR) 1993- FORMERLY MILITARY CHAPLAINS' REVIEW. ARMY COMBAT FORCES JOURNAL. (M) 1954-1956 FORMERLY UNITED STATES ARMY COMBAT FORCES JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY ARMY. - 8 - ARMY COMMUNICATOR: VOICE OF THE SIGNAL CORPS. (Q) 1976- http://www.signal.army.mil/ocos/AC/ ARMY DIGEST. (M) 1966-1971 FORMERLY ARMY INFORMATION DIGEST. ARMY HISTORIAN. (Q) 1983-1988 CONTINUED BY ARMY HISTORY: THE PROFESSIONAL BULLETTIN OF ARMY HISTORY. ARMY HISTORY: THE PROFESSIONAL BULLETTIN OF 1989- ARMY HISTORY. (Q) http://www.history.army.mil/armyhistory/index.html FORMERLY ARMY HISTORIAN. ARMY INFORMATION DIGEST. (M) 1946-1965 CONTINUED BY ARMY DIGEST. CONTINUED BY SOLDIERS. ARMY JOURNAL (AUSTRALIAN). (M) 1968-1976 FORMERLY AUSTRALIAN ARMY JOURNAL. ARMY LAWYER. (M) 1972-2003 http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS31585 2009- ARMY LOGISTICIAN. (BI-M) 1969-2009 CONTINUED BY ARMY SUSTAINMENT. ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL. (W) 1950-1962 FORMERLY ARMY AND NAVY JOURNAL. CONTINUED BY ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL AND REGISTER. ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL AND REGISTER. (W) 1962-1964 FORMERLY ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL. FORMERLY ARMY-NAVY-AIR FORCE REGISTER. CONTINUED BY JOURNAL OF THE ARMED FORCES. ARMY-NAVY-AIR FORCE REGISTER. (W) 1949-1961 FORMERLY ARMY AND NAVY REGISTER. CONTINUED BY ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE JOURNAL AND REGISTER. ARMY ORDNANCE. (BI-M) 1934-1946 CONTINUED BY ORDNANCE. - 9 - ARMY ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS JOURNAL. (Q) 1983-1985 FORMERLY OE COMMUNIQUE. ARMY QUARTERLY. (Q) 1947-1958 CONTINUED BY ARMY QUARTERLY AND DEFENCE JOURNAL. ARMY QUARTERLY AND DEFENCE JOURNAL. (Q) 1958-1999 FORMERLY ARMY QUARTERLY.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3: Australian Force Structure, Interoperability and Intelligence
    3 Australian force structure, interoperability and intelligence Introduction 3.1 The Australian Defence Force (ADF) remains primarily structured for operations in defence of Australia1, yet it is increasingly involved in coalition operations with US forces, supporting Australia’s wider interests and objectives beyond our immediate neighbourhood. An ongoing challenge for the ADF is to determine the most effective way it can contribute both to potential operations in Defence of Australia, and the increasingly more demanding operations beyond our immediate neighbourhood. 3.2 The moderate levels of conventional threat in Australia’s immediate region, linked with the low likelihood of a conventional attack on Australia, compared to the high threats faced by the ADF when deployed to locations like Iraq and Afghanistan raises questions about the suitability of Australia’s force structure. Evidence to the inquiry is divided over whether adjustments to force structure, as a result of coalition operations a long way from Australia, are justified. 3.3 A number of force structure determinants are emerging from Australia’s recent involvement in coalition operations. The key determinant for conducting coalition operations remains, however, the ability to be interoperable with our allies in a range of key areas. The importance of interoperability to ADF operations will be examined and the key issues raised in evidence will be discussed. 1 Australian Government, Defence 2000 – Our Future Defence Force, p. XI. 24 AUSTRALIA’S DEFENCE RELATIONS WITH THE US 3.4 The final section of the chapter examines the significance of intelligence sharing between Australia and the US. The discussion will explore the key benefits and disadvantages of our intelligence sharing arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiers and Veterans Against the War
    Vietnam Generation Volume 2 Number 1 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Article 1 Against the War 1-1990 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1990) "GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol2/iss1/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GI RESISTANCE: S o l d ie r s a n d V e t e r a n s AGAINST THE WAR Victim am Generation Vietnam Generation was founded in 1988 to promote and encourage interdisciplinary study of the Vietnam War era and the Vietnam War generation. The journal is published by Vietnam Generation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation devoted to promoting scholarship on recent history and contemporary issues. ViETNAM G en eratio n , In c . ViCE-pRESidENT PRESidENT SECRETARY, TREASURER Herman Beavers Kali Tal Cindy Fuchs Vietnam G eneration Te c HnIc a I A s s is t a n c e EdiTOR: Kali Tal Lawrence E. Hunter AdvisoRy BoARd NANCY ANISFIELD MICHAEL KLEIN RUTH ROSEN Champlain College University of Ulster UC Davis KEVIN BOWEN GABRIEL KOLKO WILLIAM J. SEARLE William Joiner Center York University Eastern Illinois University University of Massachusetts JACQUELINE LAWSON JAMES C.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodical Press Galleries* Rules
    PERIODICAL PRESS GALLERIES* HOUSE PERIODICAL PRESS GALLERY The Capitol, H–304, 225–2941 Director.—Robert M. Zatkowski. Assistant Directors: Laura L. Eckart, Robert L. Stallings. SENATE PERIODICAL PRESS GALLERY The Capitol, S–320, 224–0265 Director.—Edward V. Pesce. Assistant Directors: Justin Wilson, Shawna Blair. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENTS Richard E. Cohen, National Journal Tracy Schmidt, Time Magazine Ben Pershing, Roll Call Danielle Knight, U.S. News & World Report Heather Rothman, BNA News Eamon Javers, Business Week Margaret Shreve, Tax Notes RULES GOVERNING PERIODICAL PRESS GALLERIES 1. Persons eligible for admission to the Periodical Press Galleries must be bona fide resident correspondents of reputable standing, giving their chief attention to the gathering and reporting of news. They shall state in writing the names of their employers and their additional sources of earned income; and they shall declare that, while a member of the Galleries, they will not act as an agent in the prosecution of claims, and will not become engaged or assist, directly or indirectly, in any lobbying, promotion, advertising, or publicity activity intended to influence legislation or any other action of the Congress, nor any matter before any independent agency, or any department or other instrumentality of the Executive branch; and that they will not act as an agent for, or be employed by the Federal, or any State, local or foreign government or representatives thereof; and that they will not, directly or indirectly, furnish special or ‘‘insider’’ information intended to influence prices or for the purpose of trading on any commodity or stock exchange; and that they will not become employed, directly or indirectly, by any stock exchange, board of trade or other organization or member thereof, or brokerage house or broker engaged in the buying and selling of any security or commodity.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Australians Brochure
    SEE YOURSELF IN A REWARDING ROLE CHOOSE A JOB IN A DIVERSE AND SUPPORTIVE WORKPLACE A CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR COUNTRY’S DEFENCE THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE (ADF) IS AN EMPLOYER OF CHOICE FOR HUNDREDS OF INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS. Help maintain a proud tradition of service by joining the thousands of Indigenous men and women who for over 100 years, have contributed to the protection of our country and its interests as members of the ADF. In the Navy, Army or Air Force, you’ll work alongside Indigenous Australians from across the ranks, enjoying opportunities rarely found in civilian employment. As you serve your country and community, your abilities will be nurtured and given focus. You’ll receive world-class training and be given the opportunity to earn qualifications that will give you the skills, knowledge and experience to reach your full potential in a fulfilling role. 01 FEATURED 04 GET A GREAT JOB AND MORE 08 RECEIVE WORLD-CLASS TRAINING INSIDE AND EDUCATION 09 CHOOSE YOUR IDEAL ROLE 10 ENTER THE WAY YOU WANT TO 14 ACHIEVE YOUR POTENTIAL 16 INDIGENOUS PRE-RECRUIT PROGRAM 18 NAVY INDIGENOUS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 20 ARMY INDIGENOUS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 22 AIR FORCE INDIGENOUS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES 26 ACCESS FLEXIBLE ENTRY PATHWAYS 28 HOW TO JOIN 32 CONTACT US 02 03 GET A GREAT JOB AND MORE REWARDING, WELL-PAID WORK IS JUST THE START. AS A FULL-TIME MEMBER OF THE ADF YOU’LL ENJOY: A friendly and supportive team environment that embraces cultural, social and workforce diversity A competitive salary and superannuation Equal pay regardless
    [Show full text]
  • Newman's Own® Awards Announce
    PRESS RELEASE Contact: Michelle Baldanza, Fisher House Foundation [email protected] Contact: Brandon Rook, Newman’s Own Foundation, [email protected] Contact: Christine Aquino, Military Times [email protected] Newman’s Own® Awards Announce 2020 Grant Winners *** Funds Continue to Support Military Non-Profits Offering Quality Veteran Care ROCKVILLE, Md (Nov. 11, 2020) – Fisher House Foundation, Military Times, and Newman’s Own have awarded grants to six non-profit organizations supporting military servicemembers and their families. Newman’s Own® Awards provide funding toward innovative programs created to improve the quality of life for veterans. Newman’s Own® Awards began in 1999 and have now awarded more than $2.1 million across 185 non- profit programs. The grant’s name honors the legacy of Paul Newman, founder of Newman’s Own, who sought to help make a difference in the lives of others. Paul, a Navy veteran, served in the Pacific during World War II. Later in life, he came up with his own line of salad dressings, pasta sauces, pizzas, salsas and much more and decided that all the profits from Newman’s Own products would go to charities. “Fisher House Foundation congratulates the 2020 Newman’s Own Awards grant recipients, all of which offer important programs to support our military and veteran communities,” said Chairman and CEO of Fisher House Foundation Ken Fisher. “Thank you to our partners at Newman’s Own and Military Times, along with our distinguished judges, for their dedication to helping non-profits succeed, especially in such trying times.” “Military Times is honored to provide our platform to find and recognize organizations whose mission is to help improve the lives of veterans and their families,” said Andrew Tilghman, Military Times executive editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 03 Issue 3
    Autumn Readings Air Base Defense Kenney in the Pacific Wartime Manpower Secretary of the Air Force Dr Donald B. Rice Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph E. Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Gol Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson, Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Manager Steven C. Garst, Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative think- ing on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a courtesy line. JOURNAL FALL 1989, Vol. Ill, No. 3 AFRP 50-2 To Protect an Air Base Brig Gen Raymond E. Beil, fr., USAR, Retired 4 One-A-Penny, Two-A-Penny Wing Comdr Brian L. Kavanagh, RAAF Wing Comdr David J. Schubert, RAAF 20 Aggressive Vision Maj Charles M. Westenhoff, USAF 34 US Space Doctrine: Time for a Change? Lt Col Alan J.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020S Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021
    Embargoed until Tuesday, March 23, at 12:01 a.m. EST The 2020s Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE The 2020s Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2021 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 Addressing the Tri-Service Spending Spike ...................................................................... 3 Why Does It Matter? ..................................................................................................... 4 What Factors Are Making the Modernization Spending Crunch Worse? ............................... 6 What Does Addressing the Modernization Crunch Mean for the US Military in the 2020s? .............................................................................................................. 15 What Went Wrong: Identifying the Causes of the 2020s Modernization Crunch ................... 16 The Shape and Size of the Tri-Service Modernization Crunch ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aviation: Issues and Options for Combating Terrorism and Counterinsurgency
    Order Code RL32737 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Military Aviation: Issues and Options for Combating Terrorism and Counterinsurgency January 27, 2006 Christopher Bolkcom Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle East Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Military Aviation: Issues and Options for Combating Terrorism Summary By all accounts, the U.S. military dominates state-on-state conflict. In the past, non-state actors (terrorists, guerrillas, drug traffickers) appeared to be less threatening to U.S. national security than the well funded, well organized, and potent armed forces of an enemy nation-state. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 illustrate, however, that small groups of non-state actors can exploit relatively inexpensive and commercially available technology to conduct very destructive attacks over great distances. Today’s U.S. armed forces were developed principally with state-on-state conflict in mind. Combating non-state actors, however, presents a number of distinct challenges in terms of operations, cost, and mindset. Non-state actors generally strive to hide within civilian populations. While U.S. policy makers typically seek quick and decisive victories, non-state actors seek protracted war. Non-state actors often employ cheap, commercially available weapons, that often result in expensive responses by the United States. Many of the weapons and methods employed today by U.S. armed forces can be used against non-state actors. Some, however, are more directly applicable than others. U.S. experience in conducting close air support (CAS), employing special operations forces (SOF) and advising friendly governments in using aviation to defend themselves from insurgents and terrorists may form a basis for building capabilities against non-state actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Operations at Pine Gap
    The Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Management of Operations at Pine Gap Desmond Ball, Bill Robinson and Richard Tanter Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability Special Report 24 November 2015 Summary The management of operations at the Pine Gap facility has become increasingly complex as the functions of the station have expanded, the number of agencies involved has grown, and the demands of a wider range of ‘users’ or ‘customers’ for the provision of ‘actionable intelligence’ in near real-time have increased markedly. Operations at Pine Gap are now completely integrated, in terms of American and Australian, civilian and military, and contractor personnel working together in the Operations Room; the organisational structure for managing operations, which embodies concerted collaboration of multiple US agencies, including the National Reconnaissance Office, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Service Cryptologic Agencies and the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); and functionally with respect to signals intelligence (SIGINT) collected by the geosynchronous SIGINT satellites controlled by Pine Gap, communications intelligence collected by foreign satellite/communications satellite (FORNSAT/COMSAT) interception systems at Pine Gap, and imagery and geospatial intelligence produced by the NGA, as well as missile launch detection and tracking data. Conceptualising the extraordinary growth and expansion of operations at Pine Gap is not easy – by the nature of the facility. Externally, it is evident in the increase in size of the two main operations buildings within the high security compound – areas quite distinct from the separate part of the facility that deals with administration matters. The total area of floor space in the Operations Buildings has increased five-fold since 1970 to more than 20,000 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0
    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Joint Approach Past, Present and Future
    Australia’s Joint Approach Past, Present and Future Joint Studies Paper Series No. 1 Tim McKenna & Tim McKay This page is intentionally blank AUSTRALIA’S JOINT APPROACH PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE by Tim McKenna & Tim McKay Foreword Welcome to Defence’s Joint Studies Paper Series, launched as we continue the strategic shift towards the Australian Defence Force (ADF) being a more integrated joint force. This series aims to broaden and deepen our ideas about joint and focus our vision through a single warfighting lens. The ADF’s activities have not existed this coherently in the joint context for quite some time. With the innovative ideas presented in these pages and those of future submissions, we are aiming to provoke debate on strategy-led and evidence-based ideas for the potent, agile and capable joint future force. The simple nature of ‘joint’—‘shared, held, or made by two or more together’—means it cannot occur in splendid isolation. We need to draw on experts and information sources both from within the Department of Defence and beyond; from Core Agencies, academia, industry and our allied partners. You are the experts within your domains; we respect that, and need your engagement to tell a full story. We encourage the submission of detailed research papers examining the elements of Australian Defence ‘jointness’—officially defined as ‘activities, operations and organisations in which elements of at least two Services participate’, and which is reliant upon support from the Australian Public Service, industry and other government agencies. This series expands on the success of the three Services, which have each published research papers that have enhanced ADF understanding and practice in the sea, land, air and space domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the First AIF: a Brief Guide
    Last updated August 2021 Understanding the First AIF: A Brief Guide This document has been prepared as part of the Royal Australian Historical Society’s Researching Soldiers in Your Local Community project. It is intended as a brief guide to understanding the history and structure of the First Australian Imperial Force (AIF) during World War I, so you may place your local soldier’s service in a more detailed context. A glossary of military terminology and abbreviations is provided on page 25 of the downloadable research guide for this project. The First AIF The Australian Imperial Force was first raised in 1914 in response to the outbreak of global war. By the end of the conflict, it was one of only three belligerent armies that remained an all-volunteer force, alongside India and South Africa. Though known at the time as the AIF, today it is referred to as the First AIF—just like the Great War is now known as World War I. The first enlistees with the AIF made up one and a half divisions. They were sent to Egypt for training and combined with the New Zealand brigades to form the 1st and 2nd Divisions of the Australia and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC). It was these men who served on Gallipoli, between April and December 1915. The 3rd Division of the AIF was raised in February 1916 and quickly moved to Britain for training. After the evacuation of the Gallipoli peninsula, 4th and 5th Divisions were created from the existing 1st and 2nd, before being sent to France in 1916.
    [Show full text]