DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 2 Wolfs Fang Runway Iee South Pole and Atka Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 2 Wolfs Fang Runway Iee South Pole and Atka Bay Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 APPENDIX 2 WOLFS FANG RUNWAY IEE SOUTH POLE AND ATKA BAY VISITS INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2017 1 Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Activities Considered ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Background ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Proposed changes in operations .......................................................................... 5 4 Legislative context and screening ................................................................................... 7 5 Environmental Impact Approach and Methodology ..................................................... 9 5.1 Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................. 9 5.2 Approach ................................................................................................................. 11 6 Description of Existing Environment and Baseline Conditions ................................. 13 6.1 Study Areas, Spatial and Temporal Scope ........................................................ 13 6.2 South Pole and FD83 ................................................................................................ 14 6.2.1 Land Use South Pole .......................................................................................... 14 6.2.2 Land Use Fuel Depot Location 83 ..................................................................... 16 6.2.3 Physical Environment Region Description ....................................................... 16 6.2.4 Physical Environment South Pole ..................................................................... 17 6.2.5 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 18 6.2.6 Cultural/ Antarctic Heritage .............................................................................. 19 6.2.7 Wilderness and Visual Amenity ........................................................................ 19 6.2.8 Noise, Vibration and Local Air Quality ............................................................. 20 6.3 Atka Bay .................................................................................................................... 23 6.3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 23 6.3.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................ 23 6.3.3 Physical Environment Region Description ....................................................... 24 6.3.4 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 27 6.3.5 Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................... 34 6.3.6 Wilderness and Visual Amenity ........................................................................ 34 6.3.7 Noise, Vibration and Local Air Quality ............................................................. 34 7 Analysis of potential impacts ........................................................................................... 36 7.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 36 7.2 FD83 and South Pole ................................................................................................ 37 7.2.1 Physical Environment - Snow and Ice Quality .................................................. 37 7.2.2 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 39 7.2.3 Cultural/ Antarctic Heritage .............................................................................. 39 7.2.4 Wilderness and Visual Amenity ........................................................................ 39 7.2.5 Noise and Vibration........................................................................................... 40 7.2.6 Local Air Quality and Atmospheric Emissions/Carbon .................................... 41 7.2.7 Environmental impact of aircraft crashes ........................................................ 42 7.2.8 Waste ................................................................................................................. 42 7.3 Atka Bay .................................................................................................................... 43 7.3.1 Physical Environment ........................................................................................ 43 7.3.2 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 43 2 Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 7.3.3 Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................... 46 7.3.4 Wilderness and Visual Amenity ........................................................................ 46 7.3.5 Noise and Vibration........................................................................................... 46 7.3.6 Local Air Quality and Atmospheric Emissions/Carbon .................................... 47 7.3.7 Fuels, Oils Storage and Handling ...................................................................... 48 7.3.8 Environmental impact of aircraft crashes ........................................................ 48 7.3.9 Waste ................................................................................................................. 48 8 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................ 49 8.1 FD83, South Pole and Atka Bay ................................................................................ 49 8.1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 49 8.1.2 Physical Environment ........................................................................................ 49 8.1.3 Flora and Fauna ................................................................................................. 50 8.1.4 Cultural/ Antarctic Heritage .............................................................................. 55 8.1.5 Wilderness and Visual Amenity ........................................................................ 56 8.1.6 Noise and Vibration........................................................................................... 57 8.1.7 Local Air Quality Atmospheric Emissions/ Carbon .......................................... 59 8.1.8 Emergency Preparedness and Response .......................................................... 60 8.1.9 Waste Management .......................................................................................... 61 8.1.10 Fuels Oils and Materials Storage and Handling Mitigation Measures ............ 63 9 Environmental Enhancement Opportunities ................................................................... 64 9.1 Removal of Redundant Equipment .......................................................................... 64 9.2 Sustainability of White Desert Operations .............................................................. 64 10 Cumulative Impacts ......................................................................................................... 65 10.1 Whichaway Camp ................................................................................................. 65 10.2 Interactions with other activities ......................................................................... 68 11 Outline Environmental Management Plan ...................................................................... 68 12 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 69 13 References and BibliographyReferences and Bibliography ............................................. 70 3 Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 1 Introduction This Appendix 2 Report has been prepared by White Desert and should be read in conjunction with the main report, Wolfs Fang Runway IEE Report. The IEE team which has completed the Appendix 2 Report comprises the following key staff: Table 1.0:IEE Report Team Position Name /Role Author Eleni Antoniades Snell Chartered Environmental Scientist EIA and Construction Environmental Management of Infrastructure White Desert Ltd Contact: [email protected] Author /Checker Stuart McFadzean Antarctic Operations Specialist Project Manager Wolfs Fang Runway, White Desert Ltd Contact: Stuart McFadzean [stuart@white- desert.com] Approver Patrick Woodhead, Director of White Desert White Desert Ltd Contact: [email protected] 2 Activities Considered White Desert is proposing to manage the delivery of a number of existing activities and logistics operations which have previously been sub-contracted to TAC. Specifically, these relate to intercontinental flights from Cape Town, South Africa to Antarctica and client visits to Atka Bay and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Layering of Surface Snow and Firn at Kohnen Station, Antarctica – Noise Or Seasonal Signal?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journalprovided by Electronic Publication Information Center Layering of surface snow and firn at Kohnen Station, Antarctica – noise or seasonal signal? Thomas Laepple1, Maria Hörhold2,3, Thomas Münch1,5, Johannes Freitag4, Anna Wegner4, Sepp Kipfstuhl4 1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, D-28359 Bremen 3now at Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 5Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany Corresponding author: Thomas Laepple ([email protected]) Extensive dataset of vertical and horizontal firn density variations at EDML, Antarctica Even in low accumulation regions, the density in the upper firn exhibits a seasonal cycle Strong stratigraphic noise masks the seasonal cycle when analyzing single firn cores Abstract The density of firn is an important property for monitoring and modeling the ice sheet as well as to model the pore close-off and thus to interpret ice core-based greenhouse gas records. One feature, which is still in debate, is the potential existence of an annual cycle of firn density in low-accumulation regions. Several studies describe or assume seasonally successive density layers, horizontally evenly distributed, as seen in radar data.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)
    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) An English-born Post Office technician, Robin Hodgson, wearing a borrowed kilt, plays his pipes to huskies on the sea ice below Scott Base. So far he has had a cool response to his music from his New Zealand colleagues, and a noisy reception f r o m a l l 2 0 h u s k i e s . , „ _ . Antarctic Division photo Registered at Post Ollice Headquarters. Wellington. New Zealand, as a magazine. II '1.7 ^ I -!^I*"JTr -.*><\\>! »7^7 mm SOUTH GEORGIA, SOUTH SANDWICH Is- . C I R C L E / SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ /o Orcadas arg Sanae s a Noydiazarevskaya ussr FALKLAND Is /6Signyl.uK , .60"W / SOUTH AMERICA tf Borga / S A A - S O U T H « A WEDDELL SHETLAND^fU / I s / Halley Bav3 MINING MAU0 LAN0 ENOERBY J /SEA uk'/COATS Ld / LAND T> ANTARCTIC ••?l\W Dr^hnaya^^General Belgrano arg / V ^ M a w s o n \ MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ '■ aust \ /PENINSULA' *\4- (see map betowi jrV^ Sobldl ARG 90-w {■ — Siple USA j. Amundsen-Scott / queen MARY LAND {Mirny ELLSWORTH" LAND 1, 1 1 °Vostok ussr MARIE BYRD L LAND WILKES LAND ouiiiv_. , ROSS|NZJ Y/lnda^Z / SEA I#V/VICTORIA .TERRE , **•»./ LAND \ /"AOELIE-V Leningradskaya .V USSR,-'' \ --- — -"'BALLENYIj ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Tenitnte Matianzo arg 2 Esptrarua arg 3 Almirarrta Brown arc 4PttrtlAHG 5 Otcipcion arg 6 Vtcecomodoro Marambio arg * ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 1000 Miles 9 Prasid«fTtB Frei chile s 1000 Kilometres 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Core Science
    PAGES International Project Offi ce Sulgeneckstrasse 38 3007 Bern Switzerland Tel: +41 31 312 31 33 Fax: +41 31 312 31 68 [email protected] Text Editing: Leah Christen News Layout: Christoph Kull Hubertus Fischer, Christoph Kull and Circulation: 4000 Thorsten Kiefer, Editors VOL.14, N°1 – APRIL 2006 Ice Core Science Ice cores provide unique high-resolution records of past climate and atmospheric composition. Naturally, the study area of ice core science is biased towards the polar regions but ice cores can also be retrieved from high .pages-igbp.org altitude glaciers. On the satellite picture are those ice cores covered in this issue of PAGES News (Modifi ed image of “The Blue Marble” (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov) provided by kk+w - digital cartography, Kiel, Germany; Photos by PNRA/EPICA, H. Oerter, V. Lipenkov, J. Freitag, Y. Fujii, P. Ginot) www Contents 2 Announcements - Editorial: The future of ice core research - Dating of ice cores - Inside PAGES - Coastal ice cores - Antarctica - New on the bookshelf - WAIS Divide ice core - Antarctica - Tales from the fi eld - ITASE project - Antarctica - In memory of Nick Shackleton - New Dome Fuji ice core - Antarctica - Vostok ice drilling project - Antarctica 6 Program News - EPICA ice cores - Antarctica - The IPICS Initiative - 425-year precipitation history from Italy - New sea-fl oor drilling equipment - Sea-level changes: Black and Caspian Seas - Relaunch of the PAGES Databoard - Quaternary climate change in Arabia 12 National Page 40 Workshop Reports - Chile - 2nd Southern Deserts Conference - Chile - Climate change and tree rings - Russia 13 Science Highlights - Global climate during MIS 11 - Greece - NGT and PARCA ice cores - Greenland - NorthGRIP ice core - Greenland 44 Last Page - Reconstructions from Alpine ice cores - Calendar - Tropical ice cores from the Andes - PAGES Guest Scientist Program ISSN 1563–0803 The PAGES International Project Offi ce and its publications are supported by the Swiss and US National Science Foundations and NOAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Treaty
    ANTARCTIC TREATY REPORT OF THE NORWEGIAN ANTARCTIC INSPECTION UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY FEBRUARY 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Past inspections under the Antarctic Treaty ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 The 2009 Norwegian Inspection...................................................................................................................... 3 2. Summary of findings ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Operations....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Scientific research ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Structure of the Ice Sheet Between Kohnen Station and Dome Fuji, Antarctica, Revealed by Airborne Radio-Echo Sounding
    Annals of Glaciology 54(64) 2013 doi:10.3189/2013AoG64A113 163 Internal structure of the ice sheet between Kohnen station and Dome Fuji, Antarctica, revealed by airborne radio-echo sounding Daniel STEINHAGE, Sepp KIPFSTUHL, Uwe NIXDORF, Heinz MILLER Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fu¨r Polar und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This study aims to demonstrate that deep ice cores can be synchronized using internal horizons in the ice between the drill sites revealed by airborne radio-echo sounding (RES) over a distance of >1000 km, despite significant variations in glaciological parameters, such as accumulation rate between the sites. In 2002/03 a profile between the Kohnen station and Dome Fuji deep ice-core drill sites, Antarctica, was completed using airborne RES. The survey reveals several continuous internal horizons in the RES section over a length of 1217 km. The layers allow direct comparison of the deep ice cores drilled at the two stations. In particular, the counterpart of a visible layer observed in the Kohnen station (EDML) ice core at 1054 m depth has been identified in the Dome Fuji ice core at 575 m depth using internal RES horizons. Thus the two ice cores can be synchronized, i.e. the ice at 1560 m depth (at the bottom of the 2003 EDML drilling) is 49 ka old according to the Dome Fuji age/depth scale, using the traced internal layers presented in this study. INTRODUCTION At sites where the accumulation is high enough, the upper During recent decades several deep ice cores in Antarctica parts of ice cores can be dated by counting annual layers, and Greenland have been drilled in order to study palaeo- revealed by measurements of the electrical or chemical climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Different Methods to Retrieve Optical-Equivalent Snow Grain Size in Central Antarctica
    Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, Larysa Istomina, Sepp Kipfstuhl, Anaïs Orsi, Michael Schäfer, Manfred Wendisch To cite this version: Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, et al.. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica. The Cryosphere, Copernicus 2017, 11 (6), pp.2727-2741. 10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017. hal-03225815 HAL Id: hal-03225815 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03225815 Submitted on 16 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Cryosphere, 11, 2727–2741, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen1, Gerit Birnbaum2, André Ehrlich1, Johannes Freitag2, Georg Heygster3, Larysa
    [Show full text]
  • INT Chart Scheme and Production Status
    Catalogue of International Charts Catalogue des cartes internationales . 1 M HCA13-08.1A PART B PARTIE B REGION M ANTARCTIC WATERS EAUX ANTARCTIQUES Coordinator : HPWG1 Chair Coordonnateur : Président du HPWG2 Summary of progress of INT chart coverage over the past year From the information available at the IHB, as of November 2013, a total of 71 INT charts had been produced, out of the 111 INT charts now in the scheme, that is 3 additional New Charts (NC) since HCA-12. They have been published by Brazil (INT 9126 and INT 9127) and Ecuador (INT 9129). No New Edition (NE) has been published during the reporting period. 18 INT Charts (NC or NE) are planned for publication in 2013 – 2015. They have been marked in yellow in the catalogue below. Doc. HCA12-08.1C provides a lay-out of the status of INT chart production in Antarctica, as of November 2013. Doc. HCA12-08.1B focuses on INT charts in progress or not produced. 1 Hydrography Priorities Working Group (of the Hydrographic Commission on Antarctica – HCA) 2 Groupe de travail sur les priorités en hydrographie (de la Commission hydrographique sur l’Antarctique – CHA) Part B – Region M S-11 Partie B – Région M November 2013 Novembre 2013 Catalogue of International Charts Catalogue des cartes internationales . 2 M Page intentionally left blank Page laissée en blanc intentionnellement Part B – Region M S-11 Partie B – Région M November 2013 Novembre 2013 Catalogue of International Charts Catalogue des cartes internationales M. 3 LIMITS OF INDEXES LIMITES DES INDEX Limits of Region M / Limites de la région M Part B – Region M S-11 Partie B – Région M November 2013 Novembre 2013 Catalogue of International Charts Catalogue des cartes internationales M.
    [Show full text]
  • Waba Directory 2003
    DIAMOND DX CLUB www.ddxc.net WABA DIRECTORY 2003 1 January 2003 DIAMOND DX CLUB WABA DIRECTORY 2003 ARGENTINA LU-01 Alférez de Navió José María Sobral Base (Army)1 Filchner Ice Shelf 81°04 S 40°31 W AN-016 LU-02 Almirante Brown Station (IAA)2 Coughtrey Peninsula, Paradise Harbour, 64°53 S 62°53 W AN-016 Danco Coast, Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-19 Byers Camp (IAA) Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South 62°39 S 61°00 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-04 Decepción Detachment (Navy)3 Primero de Mayo Bay, Port Foster, 62°59 S 60°43 W AN-010 Deception Island, South Shetland Islands LU-07 Ellsworth Station4 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°38 S 41°08 W AN-016 LU-06 Esperanza Base (Army)5 Seal Point, Hope Bay, Trinity Peninsula 63°24 S 56°59 W AN-016 (Antarctic Peninsula) LU- Francisco de Gurruchaga Refuge (Navy)6 Harmony Cove, Nelson Island, South 62°18 S 59°13 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-10 General Manuel Belgrano Base (Army)7 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°46 S 38°11 W AN-016 LU-08 General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army)8 Bertrab Nunatak, Vahsel Bay, Luitpold 77°52 S 34°37 W AN-016 Coast, Coats Land LU-09 General Manuel Belgrano III Base (Army)9 Berkner Island, Filchner-Ronne Ice 77°34 S 45°59 W AN-014 Shelves LU-11 General San Martín Base (Army)10 Barry Island in Marguerite Bay, along 68°07 S 67°06 W AN-016 Fallières Coast of Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-21 Groussac Refuge (Navy)11 Petermann Island, off Graham Coast of 65°11 S 64°10 W AN-006 Graham Land (West); Antarctic Peninsula LU-05 Melchior Detachment (Navy)12 Isla Observatorio
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Accumulation on Ekstromisen, Antarctica, 1980-1 996
    Snow accumulation On Ekstromisen, Antarctica, 1980-1996 Untersuchungen zur Schnee-Akkumulation auf dem Ekstromisen, Antarktis, 1980-1996 Elisabeth Schlosser, Hans Oerter und Wolfgang Graf Ber. Polarforsch. 313 (1 999) ISSN 01 76 - 5027 Authors' addresses: Dr. Elisabeth Schlosser Institut füMeteorologie und Geophysik der UniversitäInnsbruck Innrain 52 A-6020 Innsbruck Dr. Hans Oerter Alfred-Wegener-Institut füPolar- und Meeresforschung, Columbusstraß Postfach 120161 D-27515 Bremerhaven Dr. Wolfgang Graf GSF-Forschungszentrum füUmwelt und Gesundheit mbH Münche Neuherberg Postfach 1 129 D-85758 Oberschleißhei Contents 1 . Introduction ....................................................................................................................3 2 . A brief history of mass balance studies on Ekstromisen .......................................4 3. Data ...................................................................................................................................7 3.1 Accumulation stake measurements........................................................... 8 3.2 Snow pits ........................................................................................................10 3.3 Shallow firn cores .........................................................................................11 3.4 Surface Snow samples ..................................................................................11 4. Comparison of stake measurements. Snow pits. and cores ................................13 4.1 Comparison of
    [Show full text]
  • Final Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of the Proposed Activities: • Construction of the Neumayer III Station • Operat
    1 Umweltbundesamt I 2.4 – 94003-2/43 Final Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of the Proposed Activities: • Construction of the Neumayer III Station • Operation of the Neumayer III Station • Dismantling of the Existing Neumayer II Station Dessau, August 2005 2 This Final Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation of the proposed activities “Construction of the Neumayer III Station‚“”Operation of the Neumayer III Station“ and “Dismantling of the Existing Neumayer II Station and Removal of Materials from Antarctica“ is based in the main on the Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation entitled “Rebuild and Operation of the Wintering Neumayer III Station and Retrogradation of the Present Neumayer II Station“ (Ver- sion of 8 December 2004), written by Dietrich Enss, Barsbüttel, for the Alfred Wegener Insti- tute for Polar and Marine Research (assisted by Hartwig Gernandt, Gert König-Langlo, Alfons Eckstaller, Rolf Weller, Hans Oerter, Joachim Plötz, Saad El Naggar, Jürgen Janneck and Christoph Ruholl). All the graphic material in this document also originates from this Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation. This Final Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation was prepared by Thomas Bunge and Ellen Roß-Reginek of the German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt). 3 Table of contents 1. Planned activities.......................................................................................................... 7 2. Construction of the new Neumayer III Station ............................................................ 7 2.1 Starting
    [Show full text]
  • ATCM 34 FR E
    Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Buenos Aires, 20 June – 1 July 2011 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Buenos Aires 2011 Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (34th : 2011 : Buenos Aires) Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 20 June–1 July 2011. Buenos Aires : Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, 2011. 348 p. ISBN 978-987-1515-26-4 1. International law – Environmental issues. 2. Antarctic Treaty system. 3. Environmental law – Antarctica. 4. Environmental protection – Antarctica. DDC 341.762 5 ISBN 978-987-1515-26-4 Contents VOLUME 1 (in hard copy and CD) Acronyms and Abbreviations 9 PART I. FINAL REPORT 11 1. Final Report 13 2. CEP XIV Report 91 3. Appendices 175 Declaration on Antarctic Cooperation 177 Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XXXV 179 PART II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS 181 1. Measures 183 Measure 1 (2011) ASPA 116 (New College Valley, Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan 185 Measure 2 (2011) ASPA 120 (Pointe-Géologie Archipelago, Terre Adélie): Revised Management Plan 187 Measure 3 (2011) ASPA 122 (Arrival Heights, Hut Point Peninsula, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan 189 Measure 4 (2011) ASPA 126 (Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan 191 Measure 5 (2011) ASPA 127 (Haswell Island): Revised Management Plan 193 Measure 6 (2011) ASPA 131
    [Show full text]