Republic of South Africa Joint Inspection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Republic of South Africa Joint Inspection Federal Republic of Germany – Republic of South Africa Joint Inspection German-South African Report of Inspections under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection Federal Republic of Germany – Republic of South Africa Joint Inspection Team Inspection Joint Africa of South Republic – of Germany Republic Federal January 08-29, 2013 Troll (Norway) Halley VI (United Kingdom) Princess Elisabeth (Belgium) Maitri (India) German – South African Joint Inspection German-South African Report of Inspections under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection January 08–29, 2013 2 | Inhalt Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ������������ 4 I. INSPECTION RESULTS II. FINDINGS OF THE INSPECTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ���� 6 OF EACH STATION ��������� 16 1. Overview �������������������� 8 1. Princess Elisabeth Station (Belgium) ����� 18 (1) Background of Antarctic Inspections ��������� 8 (1) Overview ������������������������� 18 (2) Overview of the Inspection ��������������� 9 (2) Logistics and Operations ���������������� 20 i. The Inspection Team ����������������� 9 i. Station Facilities and Description �������� 20 ii. Preparation ����������������������� 9 ii. Station Operations ����������������� 21 iii. Inspection Visit �������������������� 9 iii. Emergency Response Capability ��������� 23 iv. Other Recent and Preceding Inspections ��� 11 iv. Stations Logistics and Supply ����������� 23 v. Reporting ������������������������11 v. International Logistic Cooperation ������� 24 (3) Environmental Protection Measures �������� 24 i. Waste Management and Disposal �������� 24 2. Summary of Inspection Results ������� 12 ii. Treatment of Sewage and Domestic Liquid Wastes ����������� 25 (1) Overview ������������������������� 12 iii. Conservation of Fauna and Flora �������� 25 (2) Logistics and Operations ���������������� 12 (4) Scientific Investigation (3) Environmental Protection ��������������� 12 and International Cooperation ������������ 25 i. Waste Management and Disposal �������� 12 (5) Use of Antarctica for Peaceful Purposes ������� 26 ii. Treatment of Sewage (6) Training and Awareness ���������������� 26 and Domestic Liquid Wastes ����������� 12 (7) Reporting ������������������������� 27 iii. Conservation of Fauna and Flora �������� 12 (8) Tourism �������������������������� 27 iv. Area Management ����������������� 12 (9) Summary and Findings ����������������� 27 (4) Scientific Investigation and International Cooperation ������������ 12 (5) Use of Antarctica for Peaceful Purposes ������� 13 2. Troll Station (Norway) ������������ 28 (6) Training and Awareness ���������������� 13 (7) Reporting ������������������������� 13 (1) Overview ������������������������� 28 (8) Tourism �������������������������� 13 (2) Logistics and Operations ���������������� 31 i. Station Facilities and Description �������� 31 ii. Station Operations ����������������� 32 3. Recommendations on Inspection Results �� 14 iii. Emergency Response Capability ��������� 33 iv. Stations Logistics and Supply ����������� 34 (1) General Recommendations �������������� 14 v. International Logistic Cooperation ������� 34 (2) Environmental Recommendations ��������� 15 3 (3) Environmental Protection Measures �������� 34 (6) Training and Awareness ���������������� 46 i. Waste Management and Disposal �������� 34 (7) Reporting ������������������������� 46 ii. Treatment of Sewage (8) Tourism �������������������������� 46 and Domestic Liquid Wastes ����������� 35 (9) Summary and Findings ����������������� 47 iii. Conservation of Fauna and Flora �������� 35 iv. Area Management ����������������� 35 (4) Scientifi c Investigation 4. Halley VI Station (United Kingdom) ����� 48 and International Cooperation ������������ 35 (5) Use of Antarctica for Peaceful Purposes ������� 36 (1) Overview ������������������������� 48 (6) Training and Awareness ���������������� 36 (2) Logistics and Operations ���������������� 51 (7) Reporting ������������������������� 37 i. Station Facilities and Description �������� 51 (8) Tourism �������������������������� 37 ii. Station Operations ����������������� 53 (9) Summary and Findings ����������������� 37 iii. Emergency Response Capability ��������� 55 iv. Stations Logistics and Supply ����������� 55 v. International Logistic Cooperation ������� 56 3. Maitri Station (India) ������������� 38 (3) Environmental Protection Measures �������� 56 i. Waste Management and Disposal �������� 56 (1) Overview ������������������������� 38 ii. Treatment of Sewage (2) Logistics and Operations ���������������� 40 and Domestic Liquid Wastes ����������� 57 i. Station Facilities and Description �������� 40 iii. Conservation of Fauna and Flora �������� 57 ii. Station Operations ����������������� 41 (4) Scientifi c Investigation iii. Emergency Response Capability ��������� 42 and International Cooperation ������������ 57 iv. Stations Logistics and Supply ����������� 42 (5) Use of Antarctica for Peaceful Purposes ������� 58 v. International Logistic Cooperation ��������42 (6) Training and Awareness ���������������� 58 (3) Environmental Protection Measures �������� 42 (7) Reporting ������������������������� 58 i. Waste Management and Disposal �������� 42 (8) Tourism �������������������������� 58 ii. Treatment of Sewage (9) Summary and Findings ����������������� 59 and Domestic Liquid Wastes ����������� 43 iii. Conservation of Fauna and Flora �������� 43 iv. Area Management ����������������� 44 (4) Scientifi c Investigation and International Cooperation ������������ 44 (5) Use of Antarctica for Peaceful Purposes ������� 46 4 | Introduction Introduction | 5 Introduction This is the report of a joint inspection in Antarctica car- ried out by representatives of the Republic of South Africa and the Federal Republic of Germany in January 2013, as observers under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Protocol on Environment Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (Madrid Protocol), which provide for inspections to promote the objectives of the Treaty and ensure the observance of its provisions. This was the first inspection conducted by South Africa while Germany has participated in joint inspections with France in 1989 and the United Kingdom in 1999. The inspection team was gratified by the friendly wel- come by personnel at all stations visited and inspected. The inspection team wishes to express its gratitude and appreciation for the cooperation and hospitality it received from the governments of Norway, the United Kingdom, Belgium and India, as well as from the polar stations Troll, Halley VI, Princess Elisabeth and Maitri. The team would also like to thank the stations SANAE IV and Neumayer III for the hospitality and support during its stay in Antarctica, as well as the air crews of the IL-76 TD aircraft, the BT-67 (Mia), the Twin Otter DHC-6 and the Bell 212 helicopters for their professional skills and valu- able assistance. The inspection team further wishes to thank the DROM- LAN community, ALCI as the DROMLAN operator and the staff of the ALCI office in Cape Town, as well as the meteorologists of the German Weather Service (DWD) for the reliable flight weather forecasts provided from Neumayer III. 1. Overview 8 2. Summary of Inspection Results 12 I.3. Recommendations on Inspection Results 14 Inspection Results AND Recommendations 8 | Inspection Results and Recommendations | Overview 1. Overview (1) Background of Antarctic Inspections Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty provides that each Article 14 of the Madrid Protocol also provides for inspec- Consultative Party has the right to designate observers to tions to be conducted, consistent with Article VII of the undertake inspections in Antarctica. Observers have com- Treaty, to promote protection of the Antarctic environ- plete freedom of access at any time to any and all areas in ment and ensure compliance with the Protocol. The Antarctica. Parties are obliged to have all areas of Ant- Protocol requires that reports of inspections are sent to arctica, including stations, installations and equipment, the Parties whose facilities are subject to inspection and open at all times to inspection by designated observers. that, after those Parties have been given the opportunity This also applies to all ships and aircraft at points of dis- to comment, the report and any comments on it are cir- charging or embarking cargoes or personnel in Antarctica. culated to the Committee on Environmental Protection, The provision for inspection is a key element of the Treaty considered at the next Treaty meeting and then made and is designed to promote the objectives of the Treaty publicly available. and ensure observance of its provisions. Inspection Results and Recommendations | Overview | 9 (2) Overview of the Inspection i. The Inspection Team The inspection team consisted of five observers designated by the Federal Government of Germany and six observers designated by the Government of the Republic of South Africa. Federal Republic of Germany Ambassador Dr. Martin Ney, The Legal Advisor, In accordance with Article VII of the Treaty, all Parties Federal Foreign Office to the Antarctic Treaty were notified of the names of the members of the joint inspection team through diplomatic Ms. Andrea Heyn, Unit System Earth, Federal channels on 21 November and 21 December 2012. Ministry of Educ. and Research Mr. Fritz Hertel, Protection of the Antarctic, ii. Preparation Federal Environment Agency In conducting the inspections the observer team was guid- Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica
    Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica Sergey Tarasenko Supervisor: Neil Gilbert GCAS 2008/2009 Table of content Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 1 Basic principles of wastewater treatment for small objects .....................................................5 1.1 Domestic wastewater characteristics....................................................................................5 1.2 Characteristics of main methods of domestic wastewater treatment .............................5 1.3 Designing of treatment facilities for individual sewage disposal systems...................11 2 Wastewater treatment in Antarctica..........................................................................................13 2.1 Problems of transferring treatment technologies to Antarctica .....................................13 2.1.1 Requirements of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Wastewater quality standards ...................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Geographical situation......................................................................................................14 2.1.2.1 Climatic conditions....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • Application of a New Polarimetric Filter to Radarsat-2 Data of Deception Island (Antarctic Peninsula Region) for Surface Cover Characterization
    APPLICATION OF A NEW POLARIMETRIC FILTER TO RADARSAT-2 DATA OF DECEPTION ISLAND (ANTARCTIC PENINSULA REGION) FOR SURFACE COVER CHARACTERIZATION a b c a S. Guillaso ,∗ T. Schmid , J. Lopez-Mart´ ´ınez , O. D’Hondt a Technische Universitat¨ Berlin, Computer Vision and Remote Sensing, Berlin, Germany - [email protected] b CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain - [email protected] c Universidad Autonoma´ de Madrid, Spain - [email protected] KEY WORDS: SAR, Antarctica, Surface characterization, Geomorphology, Soils, Polarimetry, Speckle Filtering, Image interpretation ABSTRACT: In this paper, we describe a new approach to analyse and quantify land surface covers on Deception Island, a volcanic island located in the Northern Antarctic Peninsula region by means of fully polarimetric RADARSAT-2 (C-Band) SAR image. Data have been filtered by a new polarimetric speckle filter (PolSAR-BLF) that is based on the bilateral filter. This filter is locally adapted to the spatial structure of the image by relying on pixel similarities in both the spatial and the radiometric domains. Thereafter different polarimetric features have been extracted and selected before being geocoded. These polarimetric parameters serve as a basis for a supervised classification using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Finally, a map of landform is generated based on the result of the SVM results. 1. INTRODUCTION Ice-free land surfaces of the Northern Antarctica Peninsula region are under the influence of freeze-thaw cycling effects on differ- ent parent materials. This is mainly due to the particular climatic conditions of the so called Maritime Antarctica and because this region is one the the fastest warming areas of the southern hemi- sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Hemisphere Mid- and High-Latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, And
    Ahn et al. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2019) 6:34 Progress in Earth and https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0277-y Planetary Science RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Southern Hemisphere mid- and high- latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO: spatiotemporal patterns revealed by satellite observations Dha Hyun Ahn1, Taejin Choi2, Jhoon Kim1, Sang Seo Park3, Yun Gon Lee4, Seong-Joong Kim2 and Ja-Ho Koo1* Abstract To assess air pollution emitted in Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes and transported to Antarctica, we investigate the climatological mean and temporal trends in aerosol optical depth (AOD), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and formaldehyde (HCHO) columns using satellite observations. Generally, all these measurements exhibit sharp peaks over and near the three nearby inhabited continents: South America, Africa, and Australia. This pattern indicates the large emission effect of anthropogenic activities and biomass burning processes. High AOD is also found over the Southern Atlantic Ocean, probably because of the sea salt production driven by strong winds. Since the pristine Antarctic atmosphere can be polluted by transport of air pollutants from the mid-latitudes, we analyze the 10-day back trajectories that arrive at Antarctic ground stations in consideration of the spatial distribution of mid-latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO. We find that the influence of mid-latitudinal emission differs across Antarctic regions: western Antarctic regions show relatively more back trajectories from the mid-latitudes, while the eastern Antarctic regions do not show large intrusions of mid-latitudinal air masses. Finally, we estimate the long-term trends in AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO during the past decade (2005–2016).
    [Show full text]
  • THE STANDARD CHARTERED TRANS-ANTARCTIC WINTER EXPEDITION SUPPORTED by the COMMONWEALTH the Coldest Journey on Earth
    THE STANDARD CHARTERED TRANS-ANTARCTIC WINTER EXPEDITION SUPPORTED BY THE COMMONWEALTH The Coldest Journey On Earth PATRON: HRH THE PRINCE OF WALES, CHAIRMAN: Tony Medniuk, DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Gavin Laws (Standard Chartered Bank), SCIENCE COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN: Sir Peter Williams CBE FRS FREng, SCIENCE COMMITTEE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Prof Dougal Goodman FREng, EXPEDITION ORGANISER & LEADER: Sir Ranulph Fiennes Bt OBE, MARINE ORGANISER: Anton Bowring, COMMONWEALTH LIAISON: Derek Smail, EXPEDITION POLAR PLANNER: Martin Bell, EXPEDITION POLAR CONSULTANT: Jim McNeill, INTERACTIVE EDUCATIONAL WEBSITE DIRECTOR/MICROSOFT LIAISON: Phil Hodgson (Durham's Education Development Service), EXTREME COLD TEMPERATURE EQUIPMENT: Steven Holland and Team, SPONSOR LIAISON: Eric Reynolds The TAWT TRUST Ltd (UK Registered Charity 7424188) CHAIRMAN: Tony Medniuk, DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Gavin Laws; Michael Payton, Richard Jackson, Alan Tasker, Anton Bowring, Sir Ranulph Fiennes Bt OBE IN CONFIDENCE EXPEDITION AIMS AND OUTLINE SCHEDULE 1. OVERALL The aim of the TAWT Expedition is to complete the first historic crossing of the Antarctic Continent, to raise over £10 million for our charity SEEING IS BELIEVING, to educate school children, and to complete our science programme. In order not to alert other polar groups, such as our long-time rivals in Norway, we will only announce the Expedition when we are 100% ready to go! The earliest date that we could leave the UK will be 1 October 2012. The alternate date, given any unforeseen delay, will be 1 October 2013. Relevant Antarctic Records 1902 First Penetration of the unknown continent : Scott/Shackleton/Wilson (Brit) 1908 First Penetration of Inland icecap : Shackleton/Wilde/Marshall/?+1 (Brit) 1911 First to reach South Pole : Amundsen + 4 skiers (Norwegian) 1950s First 2-way-pincer Crossing of Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Seismic Monitoring at Deception Island Volcano
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 57, 3, 2014, SS0321; doi:10.4401/ag-6378 Special section: Geophysical monitorings at the Earth’s polar regions Advances in seismic monitoring at Deception Island volcano (Antarctica) since the International Polar Year Enrique Carmona1, Javier Almendros1,2,*, Rosa Martín1, Guillermo Cortés1, Gerardo Alguacil1,2, Javier Moreno1, José Benito Martín1, Antonio Martos1, Inmaculada Serrano1,2, Daniel Stich1,2, Jesús M. Ibáñez1,2 1 Instituto Andaluz de Geofísica, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain 2 Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain Article history Received June 30, 2013; accepted October 25, 2013. Subject classification: Volcano monitoring, Seismic network, Seismic array, Deception Island volcano, International Polar Year. ABSTRACT of the most visited places in Antarctica both by sci- Deception Island is an active volcano located in the south Shetland Is- entists and tourists, which emphasizes the impor- lands, Antarctica. It constitutes a natural laboratory to test geophysical tance of volcano surveillance and monitoring. instruments in extreme conditions, since they have to endure not only the Antarctic climate but also the volcanic environment. Deception is one of the most visited places in Antarctica, both by scientists and tourists, which emphasize the importance of volcano monitoring. Seismic monitoring has been going on since 1986 during austral summer surveys. The recorded data include volcano-tectonic earthquakes, long-period events and volcanic tremor, among
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Treaty
    ANTARCTIC TREATY REPORT OF THE NORWEGIAN ANTARCTIC INSPECTION UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY FEBRUARY 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Past inspections under the Antarctic Treaty ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 The 2009 Norwegian Inspection...................................................................................................................... 3 2. Summary of findings ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Operations....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Scientific research ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Antarctic Winter Expedition Supported by the Commonwealth
    The Seeing is Believing Trans-Antarctic Winter Expedition Supported by the Commonwealth PATRON: HRH The Prince of Wales EXPEDITION LEADER: Sir Ranulph Fiennes Bt OBE The Coldest Journey – Background 23rd November 2012 Expedition members: Brian Newham, Leader: Brian is an experienced British alpine mountaineer and advanced skier with considerable polar experience having spent more than 20 seasons in Antarctica and with nine visits to the Arctic. Aged 54, Brian has a BSc in Mechanical Engineering and has worked for the British Antarctic Survey as Field Assistant (mountaineer) and as Base Commander for Halley Station, Rothera Station and briefly at the NERC research station in Svalbard. For the last six years he worked as Logistics Manager for Galliford Try International, a UK-based construction company who have built a new £50m research station for the British Antarctic Survey at Halley. He has also worked as an expedition leader for Tangent Expeditions – a company that specialises in mountaineering, skiing and man-hauling trips to Greenland – including a successful east-west unsupported ski/kite icecap crossing. He was the polar guide for the Circle 66 Expedition (2008) – an attempt by an international group of breast cancer survivors to cross the Greenland icecap using dog teams. Brian has wide mountaineering and skiing experience around the world, including first ascents in Andes and Greenland. He has also covered many thousands of miles of ocean sailing with voyages to high latitudes in Alaska, Labrador and Greenland where he has combined sailing with mountaineering. He was awarded the Polar Medal in 1992. Ian Prickett, Engineer: Ian is a 34-year-old engineer from Gosport, Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Frozen Politics on a Thawing Continent
    FROZEN POLITICS ON A THAWING CONTINENT A Political Ecology Approach to Understanding Science and its Relationship to Neocolonial and Capitalist Processes in Antarctica MANON KATRINA BURBIDGE LUND UNIVERSITY MSc Human Ecology: Culture, Power and Sustainability (2 years) Supervisor: Alf Hornborg Department of Human Geography 30 ECTS Spring 2019 Abstract Despite possessing a unique relationship between humankind and the environment, and its occupation of a large proportion of the planet’s surface area, Antarctica is markedly absent from literature produced within the disciplines of human and political ecology. With no states or indigenous peoples, Antarctica is instead governed by a conglomeration of states as part of the Antarctic Treaty System, which places high values upon scientific research, peace and conservation. By connecting political ecology with neocolonial, world-systems and politically-situated science perspectives, this research addressed the question of how neocolonialism and the prospects of capital accumulation are legitimised by scientific research in Antarctica, as a result of science’s privileged position in the Treaty. Three methods were applied, namely GIS, critical-political content analysis and semi-structured interviews, which were then triangulated to create an overall case study. These methods explored the intersections between Antarctic power structures, the spatial patterns of the built environment and the discourses of six national scientific programmes, complemented by insights from eight expert interviews. This thesis constitutes an important contribution to the fields of human and political ecology, firstly by intersecting it with critical Antarctic studies, something which has not previously been attempted, but also by expanding the application of a world-systems perspective to a continent very rarely included in this field’s academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Different Methods to Retrieve Optical-Equivalent Snow Grain Size in Central Antarctica
    Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, Larysa Istomina, Sepp Kipfstuhl, Anaïs Orsi, Michael Schäfer, Manfred Wendisch To cite this version: Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, et al.. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica. The Cryosphere, Copernicus 2017, 11 (6), pp.2727-2741. 10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017. hal-03225815 HAL Id: hal-03225815 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03225815 Submitted on 16 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Cryosphere, 11, 2727–2741, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen1, Gerit Birnbaum2, André Ehrlich1, Johannes Freitag2, Georg Heygster3, Larysa
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Sun, January 20, 2002
    www.polar.org/antsun The January 20, 2002 PublishedAntarctic during the austral summer at McMurdo Station, Antarctica, Sun for the United States Antarctic Program New dome in the neighborhood The Ice cools as world warms By Kristan Hutchison Sun staff Despite the recent streak of unusual- ly warm weather around McMurdo Station, the overall trend in Antarctica continues to be cold and colder. While the rest of the world seems to be warming, scientists doing Long- Term Ecological Research (LTER) in the Dry Valleys near McMurdo Sound found at least some parts of the icy con- tinent were still chilling in the “We don’t 1990s. The tem- perature drop sets know why off a chain of reactions in the this part of Photo by Lucia Simion/Special to The Antarctic Sun Dry Valleys, lead- French and Italian workers construct one of two new buildings at Dome C, a new station being ing to the kind of the Antarctic built on the high plateau. It is only the third permanent research station on the polar plateau, mass devastation is cooling.” joining the U.S. Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station and Russia’s Vostok Station. The site was of invertebrate Andrew Fountain, chosen to do research complimentary to that done at the South Pole. Read a full story on the populations that glacialogist new station on page 7. would have ani- mal lovers crying if the microscopic worms were large and fluffy. Heat wave melts ice, floods valleys "This is a fairly rapid response to these changes," said Peter Doran, a By Melanie Conner in the summer, but it doesn't usually stay in LTER hydrometeorologist from the Sun staff the 40s for a long time," said Jim Frodge, University of Illinois, and lead author of Antarctica is too warm this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 Wolfs Fang Runway Iee South Pole and Atka Bay
    Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 APPENDIX 2 WOLFS FANG RUNWAY IEE SOUTH POLE AND ATKA BAY VISITS INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2017 1 Wolfs Fang Runway IEE, Appendix 2 South Pole and Atka Bay Visits IEE August 2017 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Activities Considered ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Background ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Proposed changes in operations .......................................................................... 5 4 Legislative context and screening ................................................................................... 7 5 Environmental Impact Approach and Methodology ..................................................... 9 5.1 Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................. 9 5.2 Approach ................................................................................................................. 11 6 Description of Existing Environment and Baseline Conditions ................................. 13 6.1 Study Areas, Spatial and Temporal Scope ........................................................ 13 6.2 South Pole and FD83 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]