DOCSLIB.ORG

Antarctic Treaty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antarctic Treaty ANTARCTIC TREATY REPORT OF THE NORWEGIAN ANTARCTIC INSPECTION UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ANTARCTIC TREATY FEBRUARY 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Past inspections under the Antarctic Treaty ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 The 2009 Norwegian Inspection...................................................................................................................... 3 2. Summary of findings ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Operations....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Scientific research ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Environment .................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Military activities ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.6 Tourism ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.7 Permitting ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.8 Safety .............................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.9 Concluding remarks ......................................................................................................................................... 9 3. PRINCESS ELISABETH .................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 About the inspection ..................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Description of facility and operations ........................................................................................................... 11 3. 3 Operator ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 Scientific research ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.5 Environment .................................................................................................................................................. 14 3.6 Military activity ............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.7 Safety and emergencies ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.8 Tourism ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.9 Concluding remarks ....................................................................................................................................... 16 4. HALLEY ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 General .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Description of facility and operations ........................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Operator ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 4.4 Scientific research ......................................................................................................................................... 20 4.5 Environment .................................................................................................................................................. 20 4.6 Military activity ............................................................................................................................................. 22 4.7 Safety and emergencies ................................................................................................................................ 22 4.8 Tourism ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.9 Concluding remarks ....................................................................................................................................... 23 5. NOVO RUNWAY AND ALCI AIRBASE ............................................................................................................. 25 5.1 About the inspection ..................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2 Description of facility and operations ........................................................................................................... 25 5.3 Operator ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 5.4 Scientific research ......................................................................................................................................... 29 5.5 Environment .................................................................................................................................................. 29 5.6 Military activity ............................................................................................................................................. 31 5.7 Safety and emergencies ................................................................................................................................ 31 5.8 Tourism ......................................................................................................................................................... 33 5.9 Concluding remarks ....................................................................................................................................... 34 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty entitles each Consultative Party to designate observers who shall have the right to carry out unannounced on-spot inspections. The purpose of these inspections is to promote the objectives of and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Antarctic Treaty and the measures adopted under it. The observers shall be accorded complete freedom of access at any time to all areas of Antarctica, including all stations within those areas, as well as vessels and aircrafts at points of embarkation and disembarkation. Article 14 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty commit the Consultative Parties to undertake inspections under Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty in order to promote the protection of the Antarctic environment and dependent and associated ecosystems, and to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protocol. 1.2 Past inspections under the Antarctic Treaty Inspections have been carried out on a regular basis in Antarctica since the inception of the Treaty. All in all around 40 inspections have been conducted during the first 50 years of the Treaty’s existence. Most inspections have been geographically focused on the Antarctic Peninsula area. In the early days of the Treaty focus of inspections was on nuclear and military matters. Nowadays inspections also include many aspects of environmental protection, as well as operational matters. In recent years, many inspections have been cooperative undertakings carried out by several countries. An overview of inspections at current stations and installations is given in Appendix #1. Inspections have been undertaken by Norway in January 1990, December 1996 and January 2001. The fourth inspection was carried out during the period 19-21 February 2009 and is covered in this report. An overview of the Norwegian inspections is given in Table 1. Table 1: Overview of Norwegian inspections in Antarctica Station 1990 1996 2001 2009 Epica Drillsite/Kohnen Station (Germany) X Georg Forster (Germany) X Georg von
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Landscapes of Exploration' Education Pack
    Landscapes of Exploration February 11 – 31 March 2012 Peninsula Arts Gallery Education Pack Cover image courtesy of British Antarctic Survey Cover image: Launch of a radiosonde meteorological balloon by a scientist/meteorologist at Halley Research Station. Atmospheric scientists at Rothera and Halley Research Stations collect data about the atmosphere above Antarctica this is done by launching radiosonde meteorological balloons which have small sensors and a transmitter attached to them. The balloons are filled with helium and so rise high into the Antarctic atmosphere sampling the air and transmitting the data back to the station far below. A radiosonde meteorological balloon holds an impressive 2,000 litres of helium, giving it enough lift to climb for up to two hours. Helium is lighter than air and so causes the balloon to rise rapidly through the atmosphere, while the instruments beneath it sample all the required data and transmit the information back to the surface. - Permissions for information on radiosonde meteorological balloons kindly provided by British Antarctic Survey. For a full activity sheet on how scientists collect data from the air in Antarctica please visit the Discovering Antarctica website www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk and select resources www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk has been developed jointly by the Royal Geographical Society, with IBG0 and the British Antarctic Survey, with funding from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) supports geography in universities and schools, through expeditions and fieldwork and with the public and policy makers. Full details about the Society’s work, and how you can become a member, is available on www.rgs.org All activities in this handbook that are from www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk will be clearly identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Layering of Surface Snow and Firn at Kohnen Station, Antarctica – Noise Or Seasonal Signal?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journalprovided by Electronic Publication Information Center Layering of surface snow and firn at Kohnen Station, Antarctica – noise or seasonal signal? Thomas Laepple1, Maria Hörhold2,3, Thomas Münch1,5, Johannes Freitag4, Anna Wegner4, Sepp Kipfstuhl4 1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, D-28359 Bremen 3now at Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 5Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany Corresponding author: Thomas Laepple ([email protected]) Extensive dataset of vertical and horizontal firn density variations at EDML, Antarctica Even in low accumulation regions, the density in the upper firn exhibits a seasonal cycle Strong stratigraphic noise masks the seasonal cycle when analyzing single firn cores Abstract The density of firn is an important property for monitoring and modeling the ice sheet as well as to model the pore close-off and thus to interpret ice core-based greenhouse gas records. One feature, which is still in debate, is the potential existence of an annual cycle of firn density in low-accumulation regions. Several studies describe or assume seasonally successive density layers, horizontally evenly distributed, as seen in radar data.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • Halley Research Station
    British Antarctic Survey Halley Research Station Halley V The Station alley V took six years from being conceived at the The Laws Building comprises three sections, a Hdrawing board to its commissioning in February services/technical support area, living area and sleeping 1992. It is novel in that the three main buildings sit 4 m quarters. Diesel engines provide electrical power and above the snow on independent jackable steel platforms. their waste heat warms the buildings and melts snow to The largest is the Laws Building (accommodation) which provide water.The living area includes a darkroom, is 59 m long, 14.6 m wide and 3 m high.The smaller lounge, library, dining room, kitchen, computer room, base Simpson Building (meteorology and ozone studies) and commander’s office, communications room, recreation Piggott Building (upper atmospheric sciences) house room, storage areas, washrooms, a hospital and a surgery. specialist laboratories.The height of the platforms above There are 20 two-person bedrooms.The winter station the ice shelf affects the local wind turbulence and the complement ranges from 14 to 18 and includes scientists, build-up of drifting snow. Each summer the platforms are support staff and a doctor. Summer visitors are raised an average of 1m to compensate for the accommodated in the Drewry Building,a self-contained accumulated snowfall. In addition, the supporting legs can building on skis that is towed to a fresh site each year to be realigned to correct for distortion caused by avoid burial, and also serves as an emergency refuge.The differential movement in the flow of the ice shelf beneath.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Core Science
    PAGES International Project Offi ce Sulgeneckstrasse 38 3007 Bern Switzerland Tel: +41 31 312 31 33 Fax: +41 31 312 31 68 [email protected] Text Editing: Leah Christen News Layout: Christoph Kull Hubertus Fischer, Christoph Kull and Circulation: 4000 Thorsten Kiefer, Editors VOL.14, N°1 – APRIL 2006 Ice Core Science Ice cores provide unique high-resolution records of past climate and atmospheric composition. Naturally, the study area of ice core science is biased towards the polar regions but ice cores can also be retrieved from high .pages-igbp.org altitude glaciers. On the satellite picture are those ice cores covered in this issue of PAGES News (Modifi ed image of “The Blue Marble” (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov) provided by kk+w - digital cartography, Kiel, Germany; Photos by PNRA/EPICA, H. Oerter, V. Lipenkov, J. Freitag, Y. Fujii, P. Ginot) www Contents 2 Announcements - Editorial: The future of ice core research - Dating of ice cores - Inside PAGES - Coastal ice cores - Antarctica - New on the bookshelf - WAIS Divide ice core - Antarctica - Tales from the fi eld - ITASE project - Antarctica - In memory of Nick Shackleton - New Dome Fuji ice core - Antarctica - Vostok ice drilling project - Antarctica 6 Program News - EPICA ice cores - Antarctica - The IPICS Initiative - 425-year precipitation history from Italy - New sea-fl oor drilling equipment - Sea-level changes: Black and Caspian Seas - Relaunch of the PAGES Databoard - Quaternary climate change in Arabia 12 National Page 40 Workshop Reports - Chile - 2nd Southern Deserts Conference - Chile - Climate change and tree rings - Russia 13 Science Highlights - Global climate during MIS 11 - Greece - NGT and PARCA ice cores - Greenland - NorthGRIP ice core - Greenland 44 Last Page - Reconstructions from Alpine ice cores - Calendar - Tropical ice cores from the Andes - PAGES Guest Scientist Program ISSN 1563–0803 The PAGES International Project Offi ce and its publications are supported by the Swiss and US National Science Foundations and NOAA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’S Enduring Scientific Legacy and Ongoing Presence There”
    Debate on 18 October: Scott Expedition to Antarctica and Scientific Legacy This Library Note provides background reading for the debate to be held on Thursday, 18 October: “the centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’s enduring scientific legacy and ongoing presence there” The Note provides information on Antarctica’s geography and environment; provides a history of its exploration; outlines the international agreements that govern the territory; and summarises international scientific cooperation and the UK’s continuing role and presence. Ian Cruse 15 October 2012 LLN 2012/034 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of the House of Lords and their personal staff, to provide impartial, politically balanced briefing on subjects likely to be of interest to Members of the Lords. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1.1 Geophysics of Antarctica ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Environmental Concerns about the Antarctic ......................................................... 2 2.1 Britain’s Early Interest in the Antarctic .................................................................... 4 2.2 Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the CEE Process
    IP 84 Agenda Item: ATCM 5 CEP 6(b) Presented by: ASOC Original: English Strengthening the CEE Process Attachments: 1 IP 84 Strengthening the CEE Process Information Paper Submitted by ASOC1 to ATCM XXX (CEP Agenda Items 3 & 6; ATCM Agenda Item 5) 1. Introduction The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty establishes generic obligations to prior Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). A three-level EIA regime is established under Protocol Article 8, hinging on the level of impact – less than minor or transitory; minor or transitory; more than minor or transitory. Annex I Environmental Impact Assessment, establishes standards and processes for the corresponding EIA levels: – Preliminary Stage - sometimes termed by Parties: Preliminary Assessment (PA) or Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEE); – Initial Environmental Assessment (IEE); and – Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE). Preliminary stage evaluations are left to appropriate national procedures2 and only limited guidance on scope and process is provided for IEEs, which are again left to national procedures3, excepting only that there is a duty to advise on procedures and that an IEE has been done, and any IEE shall be made available on request4. Only with CEEs are substantial obligations in relation to content and process specified; and critically, only with a draft CEE are there obligations to allow international scrutiny of EIA. The draft CEE must be circulated to Parties (who must make it publicly available) and to the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP) within a timeframe established by the Protocol.5 A substantial case-history for IEE and CEE practice now exists. Through 2006, a total of 517 IEEs have been registered on the cumulative EIA list6 maintained by the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhomogeneity of the Surface Air Temperature Record from Halley, Antarctica
    15 JUNE 2021 K I N G E T A L . 4771 Inhomogeneity of the Surface Air Temperature Record from Halley, Antarctica a a a a a a JOHN C. KING, JOHN TURNER, STEVE COLWELL, HUA LU, ANDREW ORR, TONY PHILLIPS, a a J. SCOTT HOSKING, AND GARETH J. MARSHALL a British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 25 September 2020, in final form 10 March 2021) ABSTRACT: Commencing in 1956, observations made at Halley Research Station in Antarctica provide one of the longest continuous series of near-surface temperature observations from the Antarctic continent. Since few other records of comparable length are available, the Halley record has been used extensively in studies of long-term Antarctic climate variability and change. The record does not, however, come from a single location but is a composite of observations from a sequence of seven stations, all situated on the Brunt Ice Shelf, that range from around 10 to 50 km in distance from the coast. Until now, it has generally been assumed that temperature data from all of these stations could be combined into a single composite record with no adjustment. Here, we examine this assumption of homogeneity. Application of a statistical changepoint algorithm to the composite record detects a sudden cooling associated with the move from Halley IV to Halley V station in 1992. We show that this temperature step is consistent with local temperature gradients measured by a network of automatic weather stations and with those simulated by a high-resolution atmospheric model. These temperature gradients are strongest in the coastal region and result from the onshore advection of maritime air.
    [Show full text]
  • BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic Field Season
    BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic field season BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic field season Introduction This booklet contains the project summaries of field, station and ship-based science that the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) is supporting during the forthcoming 2018/19 Antarctic field season. I think it demonstrates once again the breadth and scale of the science that BAS undertakes and supports. For more detailed information about individual projects please contact the Principal Investigators. There is no doubt that 2018/19 is another challenging field season, and it’s one in which the key focus is on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) and how this has changed in the past, and may change in the future. Three projects, all logistically big in their scale, are BEAMISH, Thwaites and WACSWAIN. They will advance our understanding of the fragility and complexity of the WAIS and how the ice sheets are responding to environmental change, and contributing to global sea-level rise. Please note that only the PIs and field personnel have been listed in this document. PIs appear in capitals and in brackets if they are not present on site, and Field Guides are indicated with an asterisk. Non-BAS personnel are shown in blue. A full list of non-BAS personnel and their affiliated organisations is shown in the Appendix. My thanks to the authors for their contributions, to MAGIC for the field sites map, and to Elaine Fitzcharles and Ali Massey for collating all the material together. Thanks also to members of the Communications Team for the editing and production of this handy summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Structure of the Ice Sheet Between Kohnen Station and Dome Fuji, Antarctica, Revealed by Airborne Radio-Echo Sounding
    Annals of Glaciology 54(64) 2013 doi:10.3189/2013AoG64A113 163 Internal structure of the ice sheet between Kohnen station and Dome Fuji, Antarctica, revealed by airborne radio-echo sounding Daniel STEINHAGE, Sepp KIPFSTUHL, Uwe NIXDORF, Heinz MILLER Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fu¨r Polar und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This study aims to demonstrate that deep ice cores can be synchronized using internal horizons in the ice between the drill sites revealed by airborne radio-echo sounding (RES) over a distance of >1000 km, despite significant variations in glaciological parameters, such as accumulation rate between the sites. In 2002/03 a profile between the Kohnen station and Dome Fuji deep ice-core drill sites, Antarctica, was completed using airborne RES. The survey reveals several continuous internal horizons in the RES section over a length of 1217 km. The layers allow direct comparison of the deep ice cores drilled at the two stations. In particular, the counterpart of a visible layer observed in the Kohnen station (EDML) ice core at 1054 m depth has been identified in the Dome Fuji ice core at 575 m depth using internal RES horizons. Thus the two ice cores can be synchronized, i.e. the ice at 1560 m depth (at the bottom of the 2003 EDML drilling) is 49 ka old according to the Dome Fuji age/depth scale, using the traced internal layers presented in this study. INTRODUCTION At sites where the accumulation is high enough, the upper During recent decades several deep ice cores in Antarctica parts of ice cores can be dated by counting annual layers, and Greenland have been drilled in order to study palaeo- revealed by measurements of the electrical or chemical climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Different Methods to Retrieve Optical-Equivalent Snow Grain Size in Central Antarctica
    Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, Larysa Istomina, Sepp Kipfstuhl, Anaïs Orsi, Michael Schäfer, Manfred Wendisch To cite this version: Tim Carlsen, Gerit Birnbaum, André Ehrlich, Johannes Freitag, Georg Heygster, et al.. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica. The Cryosphere, Copernicus 2017, 11 (6), pp.2727-2741. 10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017. hal-03225815 HAL Id: hal-03225815 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03225815 Submitted on 16 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Cryosphere, 11, 2727–2741, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2727-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica Tim Carlsen1, Gerit Birnbaum2, André Ehrlich1, Johannes Freitag2, Georg Heygster3, Larysa
    [Show full text]
  • Waba Directory 2003
    DIAMOND DX CLUB www.ddxc.net WABA DIRECTORY 2003 1 January 2003 DIAMOND DX CLUB WABA DIRECTORY 2003 ARGENTINA LU-01 Alférez de Navió José María Sobral Base (Army)1 Filchner Ice Shelf 81°04 S 40°31 W AN-016 LU-02 Almirante Brown Station (IAA)2 Coughtrey Peninsula, Paradise Harbour, 64°53 S 62°53 W AN-016 Danco Coast, Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-19 Byers Camp (IAA) Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South 62°39 S 61°00 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-04 Decepción Detachment (Navy)3 Primero de Mayo Bay, Port Foster, 62°59 S 60°43 W AN-010 Deception Island, South Shetland Islands LU-07 Ellsworth Station4 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°38 S 41°08 W AN-016 LU-06 Esperanza Base (Army)5 Seal Point, Hope Bay, Trinity Peninsula 63°24 S 56°59 W AN-016 (Antarctic Peninsula) LU- Francisco de Gurruchaga Refuge (Navy)6 Harmony Cove, Nelson Island, South 62°18 S 59°13 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-10 General Manuel Belgrano Base (Army)7 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°46 S 38°11 W AN-016 LU-08 General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army)8 Bertrab Nunatak, Vahsel Bay, Luitpold 77°52 S 34°37 W AN-016 Coast, Coats Land LU-09 General Manuel Belgrano III Base (Army)9 Berkner Island, Filchner-Ronne Ice 77°34 S 45°59 W AN-014 Shelves LU-11 General San Martín Base (Army)10 Barry Island in Marguerite Bay, along 68°07 S 67°06 W AN-016 Fallières Coast of Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-21 Groussac Refuge (Navy)11 Petermann Island, off Graham Coast of 65°11 S 64°10 W AN-006 Graham Land (West); Antarctic Peninsula LU-05 Melchior Detachment (Navy)12 Isla Observatorio
    [Show full text]