DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology Update and Integration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology Update and Integration GEOLOGY UPDATE AND INTEGRATION A Report by ODIN Reservoir Consultants DMIRS/2018/4 December 2017 DMIRS – SW Hub Phase 2 Modelling Confidential Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 7 3. GEOLOGY UPDATE AND INTEGRATION ................................................................................... 12 3.1 STRUTURAL REVIEW .................................................................................................................. 12 3.2 SEISMIC DATA CONDITIONING AND AUTOMATIC FAULT EXTRACTION ............................................... 17 3.3 FAULT ANALYSIS & FRACTAL STUDIES ........................................................................................ 18 4. REVIEW OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ANALOGUES FOR PALEOSOLS .................. 21 4.1 LESUEUR FORMATION ................................................................................................................ 21 4.2 SOILS ....................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.1 Information and Analogues for Paleosols ........................................................................ 27 4.3 REVIEW OF REGIONAL DIAGENETIC INFORMATION ....................................................................... 29 4.3.1 Summary of the Most Significant Papers On Diagenetic Features ................................. 30 4.3.2 Diagenetic Features/Processes of Paleosols .................................................................. 30 5. DISCUSSION ABOUT PALEOSOLS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PALEOSOL FACIES MODELLING. ........................................................................................................................................ 33 6. SUMMARY OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT PAPERS ON PALEOSOLS ..................................... 43 (Beerbower, 1961 & 1969) ............................................................................................................. 43 (Fedorko et al. 2011) ...................................................................................................................... 43 (Cecil, C.B., 1990) .......................................................................................................................... 44 Cecil et al. (2011) ........................................................................................................................... 45 (Catena et al, 2012) ........................................................................................................................ 45 (Chumakov et al, 2002) .................................................................................................................. 46 (Donaldson et al. 1985) .................................................................................................................. 46 (Driese et al., 2005) ........................................................................................................................ 47 (Driese et al., 2000). ....................................................................................................................... 47 (Hembree, et. al 2014) ................................................................................................................... 47 (Hembree, 2011). ........................................................................................................................... 47 (Joeckel, 1995) ............................................................................................................................... 48 (Knight, 1990) ................................................................................................................................. 48 (Kovda et al., 2003) ........................................................................................................................ 49 (Kraus, 1999) .................................................................................................................................. 49 (Mack et al., 2010) .......................................................................................................................... 49 (McCarthy et al., 1998) ................................................................................................................... 50 (Nord et al., 2011). ......................................................................................................................... 50 (Opdyke et al., 1994) ...................................................................................................................... 50 (Phillips et al., 1984) ....................................................................................................................... 51 (Retallack, 2008) ............................................................................................................................ 51 (Sheldon et al., 2009) ..................................................................................................................... 51 (Soil Survey Staff, 2014) ................................................................................................................ 51 (Sturgeon, 1958)............................................................................................................................. 52 (Tabor et al., 2004 &2008) ............................................................................................................. 52 (Ufnar et al., 2005) ......................................................................................................................... 52 (Viscarra, 2011) .............................................................................................................................. 53 (Wilkinson et al., 2009) ................................................................................................................... 53 (Wilson, 1999) ................................................................................................................................ 53 7. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 55 8. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................. 57 9. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 60 Page 2 of 66 December 2017 DMIRS – SW Hub Phase 2 Modelling Confidential Figure 2-1: Harvey Location Map showing the area of interest ............................................................... 7 Figure 2-2: “Break-up" Event ................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2-3: Late Triassic Climate (After Reference 3) ........................................................................... 10 Figure 2-4 Stratigraphy of Perth Basin (Harvey Area within red box) ................................................... 11 Figure 3-1: Fractures Interpreted from Image Logs Match the Faults Interpreted from Seismic. ......... 13 Figure 3-2: Top Wonnerup 3D View Showing Possible Transfer Zone ................................................. 14 Figure 3-3: Fault Review - Throw versus Length .................................................................................. 15 Figure 3-4: Potential Fault Compartments ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 3-5: Schlumberger’s Petrel ANT Tracking Workflow .................................................................. 17 Figure 3-6: Schlumberger Petrel ANT Tracking Product ....................................................................... 18 Figure 3-8: Comparison of Impact of Seismic Quality/Resolution ......................................................... 20 Figure 3-9: Fractal Analysis using Harvey Fault Data ........................................................................... 20 Figure 4-1: Image of the Earth during the Late Triassic (Scotese Ancient Earth Atlas 2017)............... 21 Figure 4-2: Late Triassic Climate ........................................................................................................... 22 Figure 4-3: Perth Basin, Geoscience Australia. Australian Government .............................................. 22 Figure 4-4: Lithostratigraphy and location of the Harvey Area (Ref: CSIRO, 2013) ............................. 23 Figure 4-5: Facies Model based on GSWA Harvey 1 Core Interpretation by CSIRO ........................... 24 Figure 4-6: The twelve orders of soil taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture .................. 25 Figure 4-7: Example of a Vertisol (“The twelve order of soil taxonomy.” United States Department of Agriculture.) .................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 4-8: Summary of diagenetic processes with depth .................................................................... 32 Figure 5-1: Pedogenic development in a fluvial system related to sea-level cycle (Wright & Marriot 1993 in Kraus 1999 ) ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix D Soil Series Descriptions
    Appendix D Soil Series Descriptions Soil Series Descriptions Soil Orders Mollisols — This order covers a considerable land area of western and southern Minnesota and is the basis for the state's productive agricultural base. The formative syllable, oll, is derived from the Latin word mollis, or soft. Its most distinguishing feature is a thick, dark-colored surface layer that is high in nutrients. It occurs throughout the former prairie areas of Minnesota. The Latin term for soft in its name is descriptive in that most of these soils usually have a rather loose, low-density surface. Three suborders of mollisols occur in Minnesota: Aquolls, Udolls, and Ustolls. Alfisols — This order covers a large land area in Minnesota, part of which is now cultivated and part forested. Alf is the formative element and is coined from a soil term, pedalfer. Pedalfers were identified in the 1930s as soils of the eastern part of the United States with an accumulation of aluminum and iron. The alf refers to the chemical symbols for aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe). Alfisols are primarily fertile soils of the forest, formed in loamy or clayey material. The surface layer of soil, usually light gray or brown, has less clay in it than does the subsoil. These soils are usually moist during the summer, although they may dry during occasional droughts. Two suborders of alfisols occur in Minnesota: Aqualfs and Udalfs. Histosols — The formative element in the name is ist and comes from the Greek word histos, which means tissue. This is an appropriate association because these soils are formed from plant remains in wet environments like marshes and bogs.
    [Show full text]
  • DE LA SCIENCE DES SOLS Anglais - Frangais Franiais - Anglais
    GLOSSAIRE DE LA SCIENCE DES SOLS Anglais - Frangais Franiais - Anglais Compild par CARL E. FERGUSON Ph. D. Conseiller en Pddologie de I'A.I.D. Publidt par REGIONAL TECHNICAL AIDS CENTER American Embassy - Paris-France qui relive du DEPARTMENT OF STATE Agency for International Development Washington D.C. -- m . ILo INTRODUCTION TM.7,JE DES MATIERES L'auteur a pr~par6 le present glossaire durant une p6riode de deux ans, au cours de laquelle il a servi en qualit de conseiller p~dologue de i'Agency for International Development (AID) L Rabat, Maroc. INTRODUCTION .............................. 3 L'auteurLe glossaire, bien qu'assez iiche, n'est pas exhaustif. s'est efforc6 de choisir le ou les termes GLOSSAIRE ANGLAIS-FRANAIS ................ 5 6quivalents les plus couramment empl.cy~s et acceptes GLOSSAIRE FRANAIS-ANCLAIS ................ 81 par ies p~dologues et les sp~cialistes de la science du sol. Certains termes 61mentaires y ont 6t6 incorpor6s LISTE DE 200 VERBES ANGLAIS FRAQUEMMENT A l'iniention des 6tudiants peu vers6s dans l'une des EMPLOYtS EN P&DOLOGIE ...................... 157 deux Jangues. LISTE DE 200 Vf.PBES FRAN9AIS FROQUEMMENT L'auteur tient A remercier les personnalit6s ci-apr~s EMPLOYfS EN P DOLOGM ....................... 165 des suggestions et observations formuler au cours de qu'elles ont bien voulu BIBLIOGRAPHIE ]a preparation du glossaire : .............................. 173 M. Georges Bryssine, Chef de Ia Station d'eclogie, Service des recherches agronomiques, Ministare de 'Agriculture; M. J. Wilber , p~dologue et M. Claude Michel, agronome du mame service ; et M. Paul Avril, Conseiller p~dologue de la FAO au Maroc. L'auteur exprime 6galement sa gratitude au Service de traduction de !a Mission de I'AID ARabat, qui a bien voulu reviser le manuscrit et formiler des suggestions utiles concer­ nant la disposition du xat~riel.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Agricultural Soil Maps in Making Soil Surveys
    108 USE OF AGRICULTURAL SOIL MAPS IN MAKING SOIL SURVEYS L. D HICKS, Chief Soils Engineer North Oil 'lina State Highway and Pubi Works Commission SYNOPSIS Soil surveys are made to obtain information relative to the type, extent of occurrence, and characteristics of the soils in a given area. The use of the pedological system of classification permits easy identification of the soils as to type, and knowledge of the characteristics of various soil types and previous experience with them can be utilized in planning and design. A large portion of many states has been surveyed by the Department of Agri• culture and maps are available showing the location of the various soil types. These maps may be used as guides in making soil surveys, and in many instances they contain all of the information desired. When agricultural soil maps are not available or when extreme accuracy is necessary, a soil survey must be made. The pedological system of classification can be used in making the survey by anyone with some knowledge of the system, assisted by a soil identification "key". This paper describes the use of agricultural soil maps by the North Carolina State Highway Department and a soil identification key used in making soil sur• veys IS included. The use of the key is described. The first soil surveys in the United suitability for various crops given. In• States were made m 1899 by the Depart• cluded in each report is a map of the ment of Agriculture for agricultural pur• area surveyed, usually a county, showing poses.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Trends of Soil Climate Regimes and Drought Events in the Northern Great Plains
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Computer Science and Engineering, Department CSE Conference and Workshop Papers of 2003 PATTERNS AND TRENDS OF SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES AND DROUGHT EVENTS IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS William J. Waltman University of Nebraska – Lincoln, [email protected] Stephen M. Goddard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] S. E. Reichenbach University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Mark Svoboda University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Michael Hayes University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cseconfwork Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Waltman, William J.; Goddard, Stephen M.; Reichenbach, S. E.; Svoboda, Mark; Hayes, Michael; and Peake, J. S., "PATTERNS AND TRENDS OF SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES AND DROUGHT EVENTS IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS" (2003). CSE Conference and Workshop Papers. 158. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cseconfwork/158 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Computer Science and Engineering, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in CSE Conference and Workshop Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors William J. Waltman, Stephen M. Goddard, S. E. Reichenbach, Mark Svoboda, Michael Hayes, and J. S. Peake This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ cseconfwork/158 Presented at Applied Geography Conference, 2003. PATTERNS AND TRENDS OF SOIL CLIMATE REGIMES AND DROUGHT EVENTS IN THE NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS W.J. Waltman, S.
    [Show full text]
  • For Part Ii Hons. Geography Module 6
    FOR PART II HONS. GEOGRAPHY MODULE 6; UNIT : 1 ; TOPIC : 1.2 Prepared by Dr. Rajashree Dasgupta Asst. Professor, Dept. of Geography Government Girls’ General Degree College, Kolkata -23 4/3/2020 1 INTRODUCTION ZONAL SOILS : Zonal soils are those soils formed along broad zones of the earth. They are very much in conformity with climate and natural vegetation such as Podzol, Chernozem and Laterite soils. They are mature soils i.e. have fully developed soil profiles with distinct horizons (A, B & C). They are very much in equilibrium with environmental conditions. INTRAZONAL SOILS : Intrazonal soils are developed within the zonal soils. Because of certain local factors the type of soil is different from zonal soils eg. Alkali soils, peat soils i.e. hydromorphic soils. Because of heavy deposition of salt, the soil has been different. AZONAL SOILS : Those soils which fail to develop mature soil profiles. These soils develop over flood plains, aeolian deserts, loessic areas, alluvial soils , sketletal soils at the foot of the mountains. They are immatured soils due to lack of time in their soil forming process. 4/3/2020 Dept. of Geography, GGGDC, Kolkata 2 According to Dokuchaev, the classification of soils is as follows Class A : Normal Soils (Zonal Soils ) ZONES SOILS 1. Boreal Tundra 2. Taiga Light Grey podzolised soils 3. Forest Steppe Grey & dark grey soils 4. Steppe Chernozem 5. Desert Steppe Chestnut & Brown Soil 6. Desert Zone Yellow soils and white soils. 7. Subtropical Zones or Laterite & Red Soils Tropical Forest Class B : Transitional Soils (Intrazonal Soils ) Name of the Soils 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation a Study of Long-Term
    DISSERTATION A STUDY OF LONG-TERM SOIL MOISTURE DYNAMICS: ASSESSING BIOLOGICALLY AVAILABLE WATER AS A FUNCTION OF SOIL DEVELOPMENT Submitted by Shawn William Salley Department of Soil and Crop Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2015 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Eugene F. Kelly Co-Advisor: Patrick H. Martin Alan Knapp Raj Kahosla Copyright by Shawn William Salley 2015 All Rights Reserved i ABSTRACT A STUDY OF LONG-TERM SOIL MOISTURE DYNAMICS: ASSESSING BIOLOGICALLY AVAILABLE WATER AS A FUNCTION OF SOIL DEVELOPMENT Forecasting ecosystem responses to global change is highly uncertain in light of the alarming rates of climate change predicted by the scientific community. Rising CO2 concentrations not only cause increased warming, but may also influence the amount and distribution of rainfall in terrestrial ecosystems. This in turn affects plant growth and the ability of ecosystems to perform important functions including nutrient cycling and decomposition. Soil moisture is considered the major control of ecosystem structure and function, and it is considered the most limiting resource to biological activity in semi-arid grassland ecosystems. Total soil moisture potentials are controlled by edaphic properties such as texture, structure, micro- porosity, bulk density, soil depth, clay mineralogy, and organic matter content. Physical and chemical properties interact with hydrologic inflows and outflows to control soil moisture causing the soil to act as a store and regulator in the water flow system of the overall ecosystem. Thus, the soil acts as both temporary storage of precipitation inputs and as a regulator controlling the partition between inputs and the major outflows: evapotranspiration, runoff, leaching, and flow between organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decision Support System for Soil Productivity and Erosion in Polk County, Nebraska
    A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SOIL PRODUCTIVITY AND EROSION IN POLK COUNTY, NEBRASKA A.E. Gadem1, S. Narumalani1, W. J. Waltman2 S.E. Reichenbach2, and P.Dappen1 1 CALMIT, University of Nebraska--Lincoln 2 Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Nebraska—Lincoln ABSTRACT GIS-based decision-support systems are powerful, new tools for assessing inherent soil productivity and potential erosion. This study integrates digital soil survey (SSURGO) information, climate, LandSat TM-derived land cover, and 30m digital elevation data (NEDS) to spatially model regions of soil productivity and highly erodible lands in Polk County, Nebraska. The approach combines soil productivity indices, derived from the "Soil Ratings for Plant Growth" (SRPG), and land cover to identify poorer quality soil landscapes in corn and soybean production. Models using the Revised Universal Soil-Loss Equation test possible conservation strategies to reduce soil-loss in areas with high potential erosion rates. These decision support tools target conservation needs at both the county and farm scales and hold promise for federal and state agencies. INTRODUCTION Land resource evaluation is the process of assessing the suitability of land for a specified kind of land use. Physical land evaluation can provide spatial information on the potentials and constraints of land for a particular use, such as crop production, natural resource conservation (e.g., riparian zone), and urban development. Land use planning relies upon the assessments of land and its specific attributes, such as climate, topography, hydrology, and soil (Bouma., 1989; Dumanski et al., 1986). In an agricultural context, soil quality is usually defined in terms of soil productivity, and specifically in regard to soil’s capacity to sustain and nurture plant growth (Carter et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Stabilization by Incipient Fusion
    Soil Stabilization by Incipient Fusion JAMES L. POST and JOSEPH A. PADUANA, Department of Civil Engineering, Sacramento State College A procedure is given for determination of the melt range of soil- additive mixtures using the phase equilibria approach, thus mak- ing possible the choice of a fluxing agent to bring the melt range of the mixtures within the capabilities of existing mobile down- draft heaters. The investigation includes the melt-temperature range of soils with respect to their composition, an analysis of soils representative of the various oxide combinations found in soil types comprising the surface of the earth, and the thermal stabilization of a soil by use of a common fluxing agent to lower the incipient fusion temperature. The behavior of soils at high temperatures was investigated to predict phase changes and melt ranges for the mineral combina- tions existing in soils. A list of common clay and non-clay mm- erials is presented, including structural water contents, typical atomic proportions of dry melt, and melt-temperature ranges, and a method is described for estimating the full-melt tempera- tures of soils with these data. Some estimated and observed fu-. sion ranges are given for soil aggregate material. Mineralogy and oxide combinations of common soil types of the world are considered, and a list of representative soils is presented together with the soil mineral contents. A typical soil from the Sierra Uplift was investigated for min- eral content, and the reduction in soil full-melt temperature was estimated for increments of soda ash additive necessary to bring the temperature within usable range for practical thermal stabi- lization.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Classification Is Here Explained, and the Characteristics and Uses of the Great Groups of Soils Throughout the World Are Given
    MAN has a passion jor classifying everything. There is reason jor this; the world is so complex that we could not understand it at all unless we classified like things together. Just as plants, insects, birds, minerals, and thousands of other things are classified, so also are soils. The why and the how oj modern soil classification is here explained, and the characteristics and uses of the great groups of soils throughout the world are given. Soil Classification By MAKK BALDWIN, CHAULES E. KELLOGG, and JAMES THOTîP ^ THE soil is a more or less continuous body covering that portion of the land surface of the earth upon whicli plants grow. That its characteristics vary from place to place probably was recog- nized by man as soon as agriculture began. The importance of such variations is emphasized in all the early writings dealing with agri- cultural affairs. This recognition of different kinds of soils and the application of names to them were early steps in soil classification made to satisfy a definite practical need. According to early Chinese records, a classification of soils, made largely on the basis of their color and structure, was developed by the engineer Yu during the reign of the Emperor Yao about 4,000 years ago {J^Op)? The soil type as conceived by the modern scientist represents the combined expression of all those forces and factors that, working together, produce the medium in which the plant grows. The funda- mental soil types can be described and their capabihties for use can be defined through the interpretation of experimental data and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 6 Weathering and Soil
    CHAPTER 6 Weathering and Soil 2. Distinguish between mechanical weathering and chemical weathering? At Earth’s surface, bedrock is subject to both mechanical weathering that produces rock and minerals fragments, and chemical weathering that dissolves or oxidizes soluble materials and changes silicate minerals except for quartz to clay, salts, and colloids. 9. Explain how sheet joints and exfoliation domes originate. Rock is elastically compressible. Removal of overburden by erosion results in tensional stress in the rock above rock below that expands due to lessening confining pressure. In near-surface rock the result is brittle fracture that produces rock joints perpendicular and sheet joints conformable to the outward expansion of the rock below. Granite stocks are massive dome-like plutonic emplacements so as they are exposed, the rock jointing conforming to their form exfoliates curved sheets of rock. 17. What role do hydrogen and hydroxyl ions play in chemical weathering? In chemical weathering, hydrolysis is when H+ and OH- ions displace atoms in a mineral and in doing so bring into being a different mineral (i.e. one with a different crystal structure). Example: Orthoclase, a feldspar with a three-dimensional framework of silicate tetrahedra, is replaced by Kaolinite, a clay mineral with parallel sheets of silicate tetrahedra. Clays have a greater volume than common rock forming minerals that as a product of hydrolysis they replace. Hydrolyzing crystals in a rock swell and the thereby strained rock crumbles. + – + 4AlSi3O8 + 6H + 2(OH) —> Al4Si4O10(OH)8 + 8SiO2 + 4K acidic water orthoclase hydrogen and hydroxyl ions kaolinite colloidal quartz potassium ions 36. Compare and contrast pedalfer, pedocal, and laterite.
    [Show full text]
  • Controls on the Presence, Concentration, Storage, And
    CONTROLS ON THE PRESENCE, CONCENTRATION, STORAGE, AND VARIABILITY OF SOIL INORGANIC CARBON IN A SEMI-ARID WATERSHED by Christopher Allen Stanbery A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrologic Sciences Boise State University December 2016 © 2016 Christopher Allen Stanbery ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Christopher Allen Stanbery Thesis Title: Controls on the Presence, Concentration, Storage, and Variability of Soil Inorganic Carbon in a Semi-Arid Watershed Date of Final Oral Examination: 13 April 2016 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Christopher Allen Stanbery, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Jennifer Pierce, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Shawn Benner, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Nancy Glenn, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Mark Seyfried, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Jennifer Pierce, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved by the Graduate College. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The National Science Foundation Reynolds Creek Critical Zone Observatory [EAR 1331872] and Boise State University funded this study. We would like to thank the Agricultural Research Service and Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed staff for scientific and logistical support. Additionally, we are grateful to Jenna Duffin, Marion Lytle, Lucas Spaete, Alison Good, Christopher Thornton, Benjamin Bruck, Jason McKinnon, Peter Youngblood, and Hayden Lewis for their considerable assistance in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Stratigraphy
    SOIL STRATIGRAPHY: PRINCIPLES, APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENTIATION AND CORRELATION OF QUATERNARY DEPOSITS AND LANDFORMS, AND APPLICATIONS TO SOIL SCIENCE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ROGER BARRON MORRISON RENO, NEVADA 1964 Mines VV\ I £6 c ' ^2- Approved by Graduate Dean K CONTENTS page Abstract ............. 9 Chapter I. Introduction .................. 11 Previous work ............ 12 What is a soil? ............ 15 Soil-stratigraphio units ........ 16 Proposal of the term geosol as the funda­ mental soil-stratigraphic unit ...... ............ 17 Definition of geosol ............. 18 Not-quite geosols .................... 19 Age of a geosol (and para-geosol) ................. 20 Naming of geosols and weathering profiles 20 Chapter II. Elements of soil description and classification for geologists ..................... 22 Soil-descriptive terminology ................ 25 The soil-profile and related terms ................ 25 Soil horizons ............ 25 General terms for degree of development of geosols . 50 Diagnostic characteristics of soil horizons ...... 51 Terms used in describing soil horizons ............ 52 Boundaries ......... ................ 52 Color ........ .................. 52 Texture .................... 52 Structure ............. ............ 54 Consistence ..... ............. 56 Clay films ....... ..................... 58 Soil reaction ............ 59 Soil classification 40 2 page Chapter I Cl. Stratigraphic
    [Show full text]