Gee Long Investigation Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gee Long Investigation Area DEVELOPMENT AREAS ACT 1973 GEE LONG INVESTIGATION AREA . '.• 711. 4099 . 452 GEE:V r---------------. ~eM~ oEPAR1MENT-0F '{ I PLANN\NG- L\BRAR ~~~~i~l~ii~iil~~ .'J g~~STRY FOR PLANNING 71 3 7 M0002826 ANQ EN)LIBONME!il J.,JBBABY I DEVELOPMENT AREAS ACT 1973 I G E E L 0 N G I N V E S T I G A T I 0 N A R E A I (Municipal districts of City of Geelong, City of Geelong West, City of Newtown, Borough of Queenscliffe, Shire of Bannockburn, Shire of Bellarine and parts of the municipal districts of Shire of Corio, City of South Barwon and Shire I of Barrabool). I REPORT CONTENTS I PAGE I Chapter 1 Surrmary 1-2 Chapter 2 Bac~ground to the Study 3.:.6 I Chapter 3 The Geelong Region 7-13 Chapter 4 . Pl arini ng Po 1icy, Submissions and En vi ronmenta 1 14-17 I Considerations Chapter 5 Goals and Objectives for the Geelong Region 18-20 I Chapter 6 Constraints on Development 21-32 I· Chapter 7 Location of Growth in the Region 33-34 Chapter 8 Development of a Regional Strategy 35-42 I Chapter 9 Management and Implementation 43-46 Chap~er 10 Recommendation 47 I Chapter 11 Requirements of the Development Areas Act 48-53 I APPENDICES 1. Sites of Aboriginal Relics 54 I 2. Submissions Received Regarding Geelong Investigation 55 Area I 3. Register of Historic Buildings - Geelong Region 56 I 4. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 57-59 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 60 I TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD :I 22ND SEPTEMBER, 1975. I M A P S I I. 1. Geelong Investigation Area 2. Natural Constraints I 3. Settlement Support Constraints 4. Sites Physically Suitable for Urban Development I 5. Urban Alternative A 6. Urban Alternative B I 7. Urban Alternative C I 8. Recreation, Resort_Development and Buffer Areas 9. Alternative A - Staging Order of Residential Development I I I I .I I I I I I -I I I I - 1 - I CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY I In August~ 1973, the Governor in Council approved Statement of-Planning Policy No. 7 (Geelong). This formal document expressed the Government's view that the Geelong Region is a suitable outlet for large scale urban growth and provides I a desirable alternative to continued Metropolitan concentration. Following this in March, 1974, the Geelong Regional Planning Authority Area was declared to be an Investigation Area by the Governor in Council using the powers I of the Development Areas Act. At the same time a number of other areas around the fringe of Metropolitan Melbourne I were declared to be investigation areas and the Board has already submitted its reports on those areas. This report presents the Board's views on the Geelong Investigation Area, and its submission completes the programme of I investigations identified by the Government in March, 1974. The Government's action in declaring these areas was directed at further developing an urban strategy for the Port Phillip District, and its use of the powers of I the Development Areas Act was aimed at minimizing the effects of speculation and other pressures during the period required to investigate the· development I prospects and problems of the areas. Having completed the investigation, the Board has reached the conclusion that some 13,700 hectares of land to the south-west of the Geelong urban area (shown on Map 5) I is suitable for accelerated development and requires controlled development. The Board has also concluded that other parts of the Region (shown on Map 8) require controlled development. No recommendation is made concerning the declaration of I these areas as designated areas. The report sets out the background of events which led to the declaration of the Region as I an Investigation Area (Chapter-2). describes the present conditions in the Geelong Region particularly population I growth trends and the unemployment problem (Chapter 3). identifies the planning strategy for the Port Phillip District as expressed in I Statements of Planning Policy and other official announcements (Chapter 4). indicates the views of relevant Government departments, public authorities and I municipal councils regarding the Geelong Investigation Area (Chapter 4). identifies desirable community goals and objectives for the planning of the I Geelong Region (Chapter 5). indicates the special features of the Region which act as constraints on development and highlight the need for a programme of conservation planning I and management to be introduced as an inseparable component of the overall development strategy (Chapter 6). considers alternative forms of urban growth and selects the south western I sector-of the Region as the most suitable location for future urban growth of major dimensions (Chapter 7). I considers alternative patterns of development within the·south western sector and identifies areas having major conservation and recreation potential which are threatened by developmental pressures, and locations where unplanned I development would be detrimental to the existing character, function and identity of urban settlements in the Region (Chapter 8). I - 2 - I stresses the need for ongoing commitment by all levels of Government and particularly the need for financial support to be provided by the Commonwealth Government (Chapter 9). · I places considerable stress on the need for a regional administrative and organisational unit capable of assuming overall responsibility for planning and management programmes which will be essential if a·policy of accelerated I development is to be successfully and effectively implemented (Chapter 9). ·The Board•s investigation has largely involved an assessment of various studies which have been undertaken in the Region, and in particular the work undertaken by the I Growth Centre Planning Group. This Group was established in 1.974 and is comprised of representatives of the Board, the Geelong Regional Planning Authority, the Department of State Development and Decentralisation and the Cities Commission. I Assisted by consultants, it has had the task of developing a planning strategy · and evolving_a structure plan for accelerated development in.the Region. The Board. I has drawn heavily on the material provided by that Group in the preparation of this report. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - 3 - CHAPTER 2 I· BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 2.1 INTRODUCTION I On the 26th March, 1974, by Order of the Governor-in-Council, made pursuant to the provisions of the Development Areas Act, the Geelong Region was declared an Investigation Area. The Investigation Area is I identical to the Geelong Regional. Planning Authority ·area with the exception of three small localities (See Map 1) which were designated on the same day. Throughout this report the term Geelong Region means I the Investigation Area. The Board was required to submit a· report on the area to the Minister within the period ending the 25th March, 1975. On the 14th March, 1975, the Minister extended the period for the I submission .of the Board's report to September 22nd, 1975. The declarati~n of the Geelong Region as an Investigation Area reinforced earlier State Government decisions relatedto the.important I role of the Region in the planning strategy for the Port Phillip District and the State. · · I 2.2 BACKGROUND In its report, "Organisation for Strategic Planning", dated the 4th September, 1967, the Board made special reference to Geelong in I dealing with the satellite town form of extended metropolitan growth. Although not recommending the latter as a general solution for Melbourne's future growth the Board stated that Geelong merited I attention as a practical alternative: The report pointed out that Geelong's location as a l~rge well established City 'in the vicinity of the metropolis made it suitable as a growth I outlet. One major advantage seen by the Board was that in spite of its proximity to Melbourne, Geelong's growth had been due largely to the development of its own loc.al resources, particularly .its port and it had only I been in more recent times that a strong inter-action between Melbourne and Geelong had grown up. In its report the Board stated that balanced ~conomic development could well demand the optimum use of I Geelong's port facilities but that thi~ would depend on the accele~ated growth of local 'Industry as a matter of deliberate planning and development policy. I The Government adopted the Board's recommendation that there should be a regional planning authority to co-ordinate planning in the Geelong area. The Geelong Regional Planning Authority (G.R.P.A.), I covering nine local government areas, was formed in 1969. On the 29th June, 1971, in referring to strategic plannirig in the I Port Phillip District the Minister, in a letter to th~ Board, stated that accelerated growth at Geelong would not only help·to relieve pressure on vulnerable areas but would also provide a means of restoring broad strategic balance in the Port Phillip Di~trict. I The Minister's letter concluded by stating that it was desirable that . the Board in conjunction with the State Planning Council· should prepare a statement of planning policy which would have the effect· I of identifying Geelong as a major growth outlet. Sl,lbsequently on the 21st August, 1973, a Statement of Planning Pol icy applying to the area of the Geelong Regional Planning Authority was approved I by the Governor-in-Council. The Statement expressed. the following I guidelines: · -----------~"""""~~----.=....-----------------------------------, ~ 4 - I 11 1.1 The Region centred on Geelong shall be promoted and planned as a location for large scale urban growth including business, industry and housing. I 1.2 The region shall be planned to accommodate a greatly increased share of the expected growth in the Port Phillip District to I the optimum limits determined by regional- planning studies.· 1.3 The pl~nni~g of th~ regton shall ensure that B~ceptable I envir-onmental standards are achieved and shall have regard to the high quality of the environment generally and the coastal areas in particular and to the need to preserve established recreation opportunities.
Recommended publications
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1958-59 VICTORIA THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD I ST JULY, I 957, TO 30TH JUNE, I 958 PRESE~'l'ED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAME~T PURSUANT 1'0 SECT£0~ 4 (3) OF THE TOWX AXD CUC~TRY PLANXING ACT lll44 [Appro.xunate Cost nf Report-Preparation, not. giveu. Printing (l,UUU \_·opie;:;), £~Go.] By Authority : A C BROOKS, GOV!'RN~fENT PRINTER, .\IELBOURNE. No. 25.-[ 2s.}.-12115f58, INDEX I'AGE. The Act .. 5 Regulations 5 Planning Schemes--General 6 Planning Schemes commenced, m course of preparation or approved 7 Ocean Road Planning Scheme 13 Eildon Sub-Regional Planning Scheme 13 Tallangatta Planning Scheme 1956 .. l;j Metropolitan Planning Scheme 18 Geelong and District Joint Planning Scheme 19 Ballaarat and District Joint Planning Scheme 19 Portland and District Joint Planning Scheme 20 W angaratta and District Planning Scheme 20 Mornington Peninsula 20 Dandenong Ranges 23 Land Use Zoning~By-laws Under Local Government Act 23 Schemes under Section 594, Local Government Act 24 Examination of Planning Schemes by the Board 24 Extractive Industries 25 Site for }[onash University 25 Melbourne Airport Facilities 26 Uniform Building Regulations 26 Exceptional Uses .. 28 Visits by the Board 28 Staff 28 Sir J ames Barrett Memorial Medal 29 MAPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS I'AGE. Victoria~-Showing Location of Planning Schemes Facing page 12 Ocean Road~ Horseshoe Bend near Lorne . 14 Camping Area at Cumberland Creek 14 Ocean Road and Coastline West of Cape Patton 14: Tallangatta-- View of New Town Showing Hume Reservoir in the Background 15 Planning Scheme :Map 16 Municipal an<l Public Offices 17 Housing Development with part of Central Open Space and Shopping Centre in Background 17 Shopping Centre, Open Space and Car Park 17 ):[ornington Peninsula-Showing Planning Scheme Coverage 21 Town and Country Planning Board THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT Rtate Offices Annexe, 107 Russell-street, Melbourne, C.l, 2:3rd December, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sampling and Analysis of Lakes in the Corangamite CMA Region (2)
    Sampling and analysis of lakes in the Corangamite CMA region (2) Report to the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority CCMA Project WLE/42-009: Client Report 4 Annette Barton, Andrew Herczeg, Jim Cox and Peter Dahlhaus CSIRO Land and Water Science Report xx/06 December 2006 Copyright and Disclaimer © 2006 CSIRO & Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Land and Water or the Corangamite Catchment Management Authority. Important Disclaimer: CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. From CSIRO Land and Water Description: Rocks encrusted with salt crystals in hyper-saline Lake Weering. Photographer: Annette Barton © 2006 CSIRO ISSN: 1446-6171 Report Title Sampling and analysis of the lakes of the Corangamite CMA region Authors Dr Annette Barton 1, 2 Dr Andy Herczeg 1, 2 Dr Jim Cox 1, 2 Mr Peter Dahlhaus 3, 4 Affiliations/Misc 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Lakes Goals 2019 - 2024 Achievements 2012 - 2018
    Living Lakes Goals 2019 - 2024 Achievements 2012 - 2018 We save the lakes of the world! 1 Living Lakes Goals 2019-2024 | Achievements 2012-2018 Global Nature Fund (GNF) International Foundation for Environment and Nature Fritz-Reichle-Ring 4 78315 Radolfzell, Germany Phone : +49 (0)7732 99 95-0 Editor in charge : Udo Gattenlöhner Fax : +49 (0)7732 99 95-88 Coordination : David Marchetti, Daniel Natzschka, Bettina Schmidt E-Mail : [email protected] Text : Living Lakes members, Thomas Schaefer Visit us : www.globalnature.org Graphic Design : Didem Senturk Photographs : GNF-Archive, Living Lakes members; Jose Carlo Quintos, SCPW (Page 56) Cover photo : Udo Gattenlöhner, Lake Tota-Colombia 2 Living Lakes Goals 2019-2024 | Achievements 2012-2018 AMERICAS AFRICA Living Lakes Canada; Canada ........................................12 Lake Nokoué, Benin .................................................... 38 Columbia River Wetlands; Canada .................................13 Lake Ossa, Cameroon ..................................................39 Lake Chapala; Mexico ..................................................14 Lake Victoria; Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda ........................40 Ignacio Allende Reservoir, Mexico ................................15 Bujagali Falls; Uganda .................................................41 Lake Zapotlán, Mexico .................................................16 I. Lake Kivu; Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda 42 Laguna de Fúquene; Colombia .....................................17 II. Lake Kivu; Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1965-66 VICTORIA TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD lsr JULY, 1964, TO 30rH JUNE, 1965 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 (2) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1961 [Appro:timate Cost of Report-Preparation, not given. Printing (225 copies), $736.00 By Authority A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER. MELBOURNE. No. 31.-[25 cents]-11377 /65. INDEX PAGE The Board s Regulations s Planning Schemes Examined by the Board 6 Hazelwood Joint Planning Scheme 7 City of Ringwood Planning Scheme 7 City of Maryborough Planning Scheme .. 8 Borough of Port Fairy Planning Scheme 8 Shire of Corio Planning Scheme-Lara Township Nos. 1 and 2 8 Shire of Sherbrooke Planning Scheme-Shire of Knox Planning Scheme 9 Eildon Reservoir .. 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Alexandra) 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Mansfield) 10 Eildon Sub-regional Planning Scheme, Extension A, 1963 11 Eppalock Planning Scheme 11 French Island Planning Scheme 12 Lake Bellfield Planning Scheme 13 Lake Buffalo Planning Scheme 13 Lake Glenmaggie Planning Scheme 14 Latrobe Valley Sub-regional Planning Scheme 1949, Extension A, 1964 15 Phillip Island Planning Scheme 15 Tower Hill Planning Scheme 16 Waratah Bay Planning Scheme 16 Planning Control for Victoria's Coastline 16 Lake Tyers to Cape Howe Coastal Planning Scheme 17 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Portland) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Belfast) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Warrnambool) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Heytesbury) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Otway) 18 Wonthaggi Coastal Planning Scheme (Borough of Wonthaggi) 18 Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme 19 Melbourne's Boulevards 20 Planning Control Around Victoria's Reservoirs 21 Uniform Building Regulations 21 INDEX-continued.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geelong Bill
    R':i8 ~~': --;~. ~.~ ~: ~::: ;~:, ~~\,A ~'~·2 :(S t : .' " ... /' L.. ~ . '~" 10; ~ i . City of Greater Geelong Bill EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1 states the purposes of the Act, which are to restructure certain councils in the Geelong region, constitute the City of Greater Geelong and abolish the Geelong Regional Commission. The Greater Geelong City Council will replace six existing councils and its municipal district will incorporate part of the district of the Shire of Bannockbum and part of the district of the Barrabool Shire Council. The Councils which will be replaced by the Greater Geelong City Council are Bellarine Rural City Council, City of Geelong, City of Geelong West, City of Newtown, City of South Barwon and Shire of Corio. Clause 2 states that with the exception of section 24, the Act comes into operation on the day it receives Royal Assent. Clause 3 contains definitions of terms used in the Act. Most of the new arrangements are to take effect on the "appointed day" which is defined to be the day on which the Bill receives Royal Assent. Clause 4 states that the Act must be construed as one with the Local Government Act 1989 but that in the case of any inconsistency this Act prevails. PART 2-CITY OF GREATER GEELONG Clause 5 provides for the constitution of a City Council by the name of the Greater Geelong City Council, for the councils to be replaced to go out of existence and for Commissioners to administer the new Council as if they were the elected Councillors of the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2013 / 2014 Page 1
    Geelong Community Foundation ANNUAL REPORT 2013 / 2014 Page 1 Geelong Community Foundation Your Gift Working Forever Annual Report 2013/2014 OUR CORE PURPOSE Geelong Community Foundation ANNUAL REPORT 2013 / 2014 Page 2 The Geelong Community Foundation exists to make a positive and Our Structure lasting difference to people in the Geelong region. The Foundation has been endorsed by the Australian Tax Office as Our Role a charity. Donations to the Foundation’s Gift Fund are tax deductible The Geelong region has needs which are not being met from and the Foundation is exempt from tax. other funding sources. The Geelong Community Foundation The Foundation has been set up to support the people living in the encourages individuals, families, business and other organisations City of Greater Geelong, the Borough of Queenscliffe, the Surf to make donations to meet these needs, now and in the future. Coast Shire and the southern part of the Golden Plains Shire. These donations are retained as capital by the Foundation to build a perpetual and substantial fund for philanthropic purposes, with the The Foundation is governed by a volunteer board of Directors, with income from this capital used to make local community grants. a wide range of skills, experience and an extensive knowledge of the community. The Foundation is able to support charitable organisations across Our Major Aims the full spectrum of health and welfare services, as well as cultural • Manage and invest funds prudently to achieve fund growth and programs and environmental projects. good returns • Make grants for the long-term benefit of our community and evaluate their effectiveness • Provide a simple, cost effective way to make substantial donations to our community • Be part of new initiatives and achievements in community building • Maintain the highest professional standards, service and transparency to the community Geelong Community Foundation Tag Line The Foundation adopted a new Tag Line this year which is “Your Gift Working Forever”.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckley Falls Park
    BUCKLEY FALLS PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENT AUGUST 1991 33?·. 1: .$!) ~ t. i FOREWORD Buckley Falls Park is one of Geelong's prime conservation and recreation areas although this has not always been recognised. Despite its proximity to the centre of Geelong and its significant recreational potential only a relatively small proportion of local residents, let alone visitors to the region, are aware of the area. This Management Plan aims to raise the profile of Buckley Falls Park to ensure that its natural, cultural and recreational values are managed in a balanced way for the benefit of the community. Through the implementation of this Plan, the conservation and recreation corridor along the Barwon River will be extended thereby further enhancing Geelong's open space system. This Management Plan has been prepared by a number of organisations and individuals and I thank them for thetr efforts and a fine result. The Plan recognises and documents the great natural, historical, recreational and landscape values of the Park. It proposes detailed management actions of varying levels of priority for implementation. · The Plan provides a set of long-term guidelines for the management of all aspects of the Park. It is recommended that the existing Committees of Management and any future Committees with responsibility for the area adopt the Plan in principle to ensure that the Park is conserved while allowing for a balance of uses. There is much goodwill in the general community at an organisational, individual This Management Plan was prepared by: and corporate level for the management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bird Monitoring Annual Report 2018-2019
    BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended citation: BirdLife Australia (2020). Melbourne Water Regional Bird Monitoring Project. Annual Report 2018-19. Unpublished report prepared by D.G. Quin, B. Clarke-Wood, C. Purnell, A. Silcocks and K. Herman for Melbourne Water by (BirdLife Australia, Carlton) This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to Melbourne Water. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate. BirdLife Australia does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment
    Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment Heritage Advisor: Bianca Di Fazio Authors: Bianca Di Fazio & Samantha Brown November 18, 2016 Acknowledgements Heritage Insight P/L would like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their assistance and participation in this study: WestWind Energy Adam Gray Marla Brauer Ashley Clifton Tobias Geiger Heritage Insight Shannah Anderson Background Research Katarina Audy GIS Mapping Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Disclaimer The information contained in this Cultural Heritage Assessment has been compiled from the standard heritage database sources and is accurate as far as Heritage Insight P/L is aware. However, within the timeframes available for technical heritage reporting, it is not possible to carry out comprehensive research of all published or unpublished manuscripts, journals, maps or oral history which may pertain to the study area. No responsibility can be taken for errors or omissions in primary and secondary source material cited in this report. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of Heritage Insight P/L only. Copyright Notice This report is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission. Enquiries should be made to Heritage Insight Pty Ltd. Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Conditions, Environment and Geology ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Patterns in Abundance of Waterfowl
    Corella,2004, 28(3): 61-67 SEASONALPATTERNS IN ABUNDANCEOF WATERFOWL(ANATIDAE) AT A WASTESTABILIZATION POND IN VICTORIA ANDREW J. HAMILTONIr and IAIN R. TAYLORI 'AppliedOrnithology Group, Johnstone Centre, School of Environmentaland InformationSciences, Charles Sturt University,PO Box 789, Albury, New SouthWales. Auslralia 2640 :Correspondingauthor (Currenl Address): Primary Industri€s Rcscarch Victoria (Knoxfield), Privatc Bag 15, FerntreeGully DeliveryCentre, Victoria, Australia3156 Received:2 Novenber2003 The seasonal abundanceof waterfowlon a waste stabilizationpond at the Western TreatmentPlant, Victoria, Australia,was studied over two years. The abundancesof species that are considered to be highly dispersive, such as the Pink'eared Duck Malacorhynchusmembranaceus and Grey Teal Anas gracilis, were erratic and inconsistentacross the two years. For other species, such as the AustralasianShoveler /nas rhynchotis,Blaak Swan Cygnus atratus, Pacific Black Duck /nas superciliosaand AustralianShelduck Tadoma tadornoides,mote consistentpatterns were observed each year. Most species used the site during what would be expectedto be their non-breedingseason. Australian Shelducks appeared to use the site as a late-spring/early-summermoulting reluoe. INTRODUCTION Pond Nine of the WTP, and draw comparisonswith previouslypublished work. The Westem Treatment Plant (WTP) at Werribee. Victoria, is known to support large numbers of waterfowl of several species (Lane and Peake 1990), and forms part MATERIALSAND METHODS of a Wetland of International Significance (Ramsar ConventionBureau 1984). A Iargewaste stabilization pond Study site within the WTP, known as Pond Nine in the Lake Borrie The WTP occupies an area of 10851 hectaresand is situated35 system,is consideredto be of particular importancefor kilometrcs wcst of Melbourne on the shores of Por( Phillip Bay waterfowl and other waterbirds(Elliget 1980; Hamilton (38"00'5, 144"34'E).A location map is provided in Hamilron ?r dl.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geelong Bill
    City of Greater Geelong Bill No. TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1. Purpose 2. Commencement 3. Definitions 4. Construction of Act PART 2-CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 5. Constitution of City of Greater Geelong 6. Greater Geelong City Council is successor in law 7. Appointment of Commissioners 8. Functions and powers of Commissioners 9. Duties of Commissioners 10. Transitional provisions-staff 11. Transitional provision---contracts and leases 12. Transitional provision-rates and charges 13. Transitional provision-local laws 14. Transitional provision-borrowings 15. Transitional provision-application of Local Government Act 1989 and Local Government (Consequential Provisions) Act 1989 16. Provisions relating to election of Councillors 17. First meeting of elected Council PART 3-SHIRE OF BANNOCKBURN 18. Shire of Bannockbum boundaries PART 4-BARRABOOL SHIRE COUNCIL 19. Barrabool Shire Council boundaries PART 5- GEELONG REGIONAL COMMISSION 20. Members of Commission to cease office 21. Appointment of administrator 22. Functions and powers of Administrator 23. Transitional provision-planning matters 24. Repeal of Geelong Regional Commission Act 1977 PART 6-GENERAL 25. Matters which may be included in Order 26. General provisions relating to Orders 3-[78J-10001S.4.93-930556-{Rev. No. 4) (921) 1 SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 CITY OF GREAlER GEELONG SCHEDULE 2 BOUNDARIES OF SHIRE OF BANNOCKBURN SCHEDULE 3 BOUNDARIESOFBARRABOOLSHIRECOUNC~ By Authority 1. V. North, Government Printer Melbourne 2 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Read 10 7 Apri11993 (Brought in by Mr Kennett and Mr McNamara) A BILL to constitute the Greater Geelong City Council, to abolish the Geelong Regional Commission, to repeal the Geelong Regional Commission Act 1977 and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]