DOCSLIB.ORG

Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment Heritage Advisor: Bianca Di Fazio Authors: Bianca Di Fazio & Samantha Brown November 18, 2016 Acknowledgements Heritage Insight P/L would like to acknowledge and thank the following people for their assistance and participation in this study: WestWind Energy Adam Gray Marla Brauer Ashley Clifton Tobias Geiger Heritage Insight Shannah Anderson Background Research Katarina Audy GIS Mapping Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Disclaimer The information contained in this Cultural Heritage Assessment has been compiled from the standard heritage database sources and is accurate as far as Heritage Insight P/L is aware. However, within the timeframes available for technical heritage reporting, it is not possible to carry out comprehensive research of all published or unpublished manuscripts, journals, maps or oral history which may pertain to the study area. No responsibility can be taken for errors or omissions in primary and secondary source material cited in this report. Any opinions expressed in this report are those of Heritage Insight P/L only. Copyright Notice This report is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission. Enquiries should be made to Heritage Insight Pty Ltd. Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Conditions, Environment and Geology ..................................................... 6 2.1 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Landforms and Geomorphology of the Study Area .......................................................... 8 2.3 Resources Available to Aboriginal People within the Study Area .................................... 9 3.0 Review of Previous Archaeological Research .......................................................... 12 3.1 VAHR search ................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Historic Heritage Registers............................................................................................. 14 3.3 Previous Archaeological Assessment within the Study Area ........................................... 16 4.0 Land Use History and Ethnography ....................................................................... 17 4.1 Historical and Ethno-Historical Accounts in the Geographic Region ........................... 17 4.2 Land-Use History of the Study Area ............................................................................... 18 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................... 19 5.1 Site Prediction Model ...................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Recommendations and Obligations under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 .............. 20 5.3 Recommendations and Obligations under the Heritage Act 1995 ................................. 20 5.4 Recommendations and Obligations under the Golden Plains Shire Planning Scheme . 21 References.......................................................................................................................... 22 Appendix 1: Glossary ........................................................................................................ 23 Maps Map 1: Location of the study area ............................................................................................................................. 2 Map 2: Areas of Cultural Heritage Sensitivity within the Study Area.................................................................. 3 Map 3: Existing RAP and RAP Applications within the Study Area .................................................................. 5 Map 4: Existing Conditions across the Study Area ................................................................................................ 7 Map 5: Map showing geology of the study area and surrounds ........................................................................... 9 Map 6: Map showing 1750s EVC mapping of the study area and surrounds.................................................. 10 Map 7: Map showing location of registered Aboriginal places inside and within 200m of the study area. 13 Map 8: Map showing location of registered historical places within the study area. ...................................... 15 Figures Figure 1: Wada wurrung language area with the Gulidjan language area below .............................................. 18 Page | i Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Abbreviations ACHRIS – Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register and Information System ASL – Above Sea Level AV – Aboriginal Victoria BP – Before Present CHA – Cultural Heritage Advisor CHMP – Cultural Heritage Management Plan DPC – Department of Premier and Cabinet EVC – Ecological Vegetation Class LDAD – Low Density Artefact Distribution LGM – Last Glacial Maximum PAS – Potential Archaeological Sensitivity RTP – Radial Test Pit STP – Shovel Test Pit TP – Test Pit VAHR – Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register WTLCCHC – Wurundjeri Tribe Land Compensation and Cultural Heritage Council Inc Please note that all maps and plans in this CHMP are prepared using Victorian Government Standard GDA94 MGA (Zone 55) coordinates. Page | ii Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L 1.0 Introduction This report outlines the results of a high level investigation into the potential heritage values of the proposed Golden Plains Wind Farm, and the implications of these values in respect to the preparation of a Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) for the development. The purpose of this report is to: Identify the relevant Traditional Owner (TO) organisations; Identify any previously registered Aboriginal Places within the study area; Identify any previously registered historic sites within the study area; Identify areas/landforms of potential sensitivity; and Provide a list of subsequent steps to be followed towards an approved CHMP. Location of the Study Area The study area is located on land at Barunah Park and south west of Rokewood, approximately 60 kilometres north west of Geelong. The study area consists of approximately 40 properties covering an area of approximately 17,345 hectares within the Golden Plains Shire local government area. The study area includes sections of Ferrers Creek, Mount Misery Creek, Kuruc-a-Ruc Creek, and Mia Mia Creek as well as other unnamed watercourses identified as areas of cultural heritage sensitivity on the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Register Information System (ACHRIS) (Maps 1 & 2). Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Heritage Regulations 2007(the Regulations) land within 200m of a named water course is considered to be an area of cultural heritage sensitivity, and this therefore applies to land within 200m of both Mia Mia and Ferrers Creeks. Section 23 also applies to Baths Swamp within the study area. Under section 22 of the Regulations a registered cultural heritage place, and land within 50m of that place, is an area of cultural heritage sensitivity. The study area contains one registered place (an artefact scatter) on the banks of Mia Mia Creek, and a further registered (a stone arrangement) place on the banks of Ferrers Creek. For these reasons the study area as a whole is considered to be an area of cultural heritage sensitivity as defined in the Regulations. Page | 1 Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Map 1: Location of the study area Page | 2 Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Map 2: Areas of Cultural Heritage Sensitivity within the Study Area Page | 3 Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Land Manager The study area is owned by multiple individual landowners and for the purposes of this study is managed by WestWind Energy P/L. Relevant Traditional Owners The Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAP) responsible for a part of the study area is the Wadawurrung, Wathaurung Aboriginal Corporation (WWAC). The majority of the study area is not administered by a RAP however the Eastern Maar Aboriginal Corporation (EMAC) and the Guligad Aboriginal Corporation (GAC) both have an interest in the area and must be consulted during the future Cultural Heritage Management Plan for the project. EMAC currently have a RAP application under review by the Aboriginal Heritage Council that encompasses the entire study area (Map 3). Page | 4 Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L Map 3: Existing RAP and RAP Applications within the Study Area Page | 5 Golden Plains Wind Farm Preliminary Heritage Assessment Heritage Insight P/L 2.0 Existing Conditions, Environment and Geology 2.1 Existing Conditions The study area is spread over approximately 40 properties and approximately 17,000 hectares. The brief site inspection undertaken to inform this study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1958-59 VICTORIA THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD I ST JULY, I 957, TO 30TH JUNE, I 958 PRESE~'l'ED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAME~T PURSUANT 1'0 SECT£0~ 4 (3) OF THE TOWX AXD CUC~TRY PLANXING ACT lll44 [Appro.xunate Cost nf Report-Preparation, not. giveu. Printing (l,UUU \_·opie;:;), £~Go.] By Authority : A C BROOKS, GOV!'RN~fENT PRINTER, .\IELBOURNE. No. 25.-[ 2s.}.-12115f58, INDEX I'AGE. The Act .. 5 Regulations 5 Planning Schemes--General 6 Planning Schemes commenced, m course of preparation or approved 7 Ocean Road Planning Scheme 13 Eildon Sub-Regional Planning Scheme 13 Tallangatta Planning Scheme 1956 .. l;j Metropolitan Planning Scheme 18 Geelong and District Joint Planning Scheme 19 Ballaarat and District Joint Planning Scheme 19 Portland and District Joint Planning Scheme 20 W angaratta and District Planning Scheme 20 Mornington Peninsula 20 Dandenong Ranges 23 Land Use Zoning~By-laws Under Local Government Act 23 Schemes under Section 594, Local Government Act 24 Examination of Planning Schemes by the Board 24 Extractive Industries 25 Site for }[onash University 25 Melbourne Airport Facilities 26 Uniform Building Regulations 26 Exceptional Uses .. 28 Visits by the Board 28 Staff 28 Sir J ames Barrett Memorial Medal 29 MAPS AND PHOTOGRAPHS I'AGE. Victoria~-Showing Location of Planning Schemes Facing page 12 Ocean Road~ Horseshoe Bend near Lorne . 14 Camping Area at Cumberland Creek 14 Ocean Road and Coastline West of Cape Patton 14: Tallangatta-- View of New Town Showing Hume Reservoir in the Background 15 Planning Scheme :Map 16 Municipal an<l Public Offices 17 Housing Development with part of Central Open Space and Shopping Centre in Background 17 Shopping Centre, Open Space and Car Park 17 ):[ornington Peninsula-Showing Planning Scheme Coverage 21 Town and Country Planning Board THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT Rtate Offices Annexe, 107 Russell-street, Melbourne, C.l, 2:3rd December, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballarat Planning Scheme Amendment C58 Heritage Amendment Panel Report
    BALLARAT PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C58 HERITAGE AMENDMENT PANEL REPORT JANUARY 2004 BALLARAT PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C58 HERITAGE AMENDMENT PANEL REPORT HELEN GIBSON, Chair MAGGIE BARON, Member ELIZABETH JACKA, Member JANUARY 2004 BALLARAT PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C58 PANEL REPORT (JANUARY 2004) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. THE PANEL PROCESS........................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 THE PANEL .............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 HEARINGS AND INSPECTIONS................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 SUBMISSIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 10 3. WHAT IS PROPOSED? ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 THE AREA AFFECTED BY THE AMENDMENT .......................................................................................... 11 3.2 THE AMENDMENT.................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geelong Bill
    R':i8 ~~': --;~. ~.~ ~: ~::: ;~:, ~~\,A ~'~·2 :(S t : .' " ... /' L.. ~ . '~" 10; ~ i . City of Greater Geelong Bill EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1 states the purposes of the Act, which are to restructure certain councils in the Geelong region, constitute the City of Greater Geelong and abolish the Geelong Regional Commission. The Greater Geelong City Council will replace six existing councils and its municipal district will incorporate part of the district of the Shire of Bannockbum and part of the district of the Barrabool Shire Council. The Councils which will be replaced by the Greater Geelong City Council are Bellarine Rural City Council, City of Geelong, City of Geelong West, City of Newtown, City of South Barwon and Shire of Corio. Clause 2 states that with the exception of section 24, the Act comes into operation on the day it receives Royal Assent. Clause 3 contains definitions of terms used in the Act. Most of the new arrangements are to take effect on the "appointed day" which is defined to be the day on which the Bill receives Royal Assent. Clause 4 states that the Act must be construed as one with the Local Government Act 1989 but that in the case of any inconsistency this Act prevails. PART 2-CITY OF GREATER GEELONG Clause 5 provides for the constitution of a City Council by the name of the Greater Geelong City Council, for the councils to be replaced to go out of existence and for Commissioners to administer the new Council as if they were the elected Councillors of the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckley Falls Park
    BUCKLEY FALLS PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENT AUGUST 1991 33?·. 1: .$!) ~ t. i FOREWORD Buckley Falls Park is one of Geelong's prime conservation and recreation areas although this has not always been recognised. Despite its proximity to the centre of Geelong and its significant recreational potential only a relatively small proportion of local residents, let alone visitors to the region, are aware of the area. This Management Plan aims to raise the profile of Buckley Falls Park to ensure that its natural, cultural and recreational values are managed in a balanced way for the benefit of the community. Through the implementation of this Plan, the conservation and recreation corridor along the Barwon River will be extended thereby further enhancing Geelong's open space system. This Management Plan has been prepared by a number of organisations and individuals and I thank them for thetr efforts and a fine result. The Plan recognises and documents the great natural, historical, recreational and landscape values of the Park. It proposes detailed management actions of varying levels of priority for implementation. · The Plan provides a set of long-term guidelines for the management of all aspects of the Park. It is recommended that the existing Committees of Management and any future Committees with responsibility for the area adopt the Plan in principle to ensure that the Park is conserved while allowing for a balance of uses. There is much goodwill in the general community at an organisational, individual This Management Plan was prepared by: and corporate level for the management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geelong Bill
    City of Greater Geelong Bill No. TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1. Purpose 2. Commencement 3. Definitions 4. Construction of Act PART 2-CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 5. Constitution of City of Greater Geelong 6. Greater Geelong City Council is successor in law 7. Appointment of Commissioners 8. Functions and powers of Commissioners 9. Duties of Commissioners 10. Transitional provisions-staff 11. Transitional provision---contracts and leases 12. Transitional provision-rates and charges 13. Transitional provision-local laws 14. Transitional provision-borrowings 15. Transitional provision-application of Local Government Act 1989 and Local Government (Consequential Provisions) Act 1989 16. Provisions relating to election of Councillors 17. First meeting of elected Council PART 3-SHIRE OF BANNOCKBURN 18. Shire of Bannockbum boundaries PART 4-BARRABOOL SHIRE COUNCIL 19. Barrabool Shire Council boundaries PART 5- GEELONG REGIONAL COMMISSION 20. Members of Commission to cease office 21. Appointment of administrator 22. Functions and powers of Administrator 23. Transitional provision-planning matters 24. Repeal of Geelong Regional Commission Act 1977 PART 6-GENERAL 25. Matters which may be included in Order 26. General provisions relating to Orders 3-[78J-10001S.4.93-930556-{Rev. No. 4) (921) 1 SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 CITY OF GREAlER GEELONG SCHEDULE 2 BOUNDARIES OF SHIRE OF BANNOCKBURN SCHEDULE 3 BOUNDARIESOFBARRABOOLSHIRECOUNC~ By Authority 1. V. North, Government Printer Melbourne 2 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Read 10 7 Apri11993 (Brought in by Mr Kennett and Mr McNamara) A BILL to constitute the Greater Geelong City Council, to abolish the Geelong Regional Commission, to repeal the Geelong Regional Commission Act 1977 and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Ablaze
    Buninyong & District Community NEWS Edition 477, DECEMBER 2020 Thick smoke greeted CFA volunteers when they arrived to fight the Mt Buninyong fires. Photo Des Sunderland. MOUNT ABLAZE The fire which burnt about ten Fire crews remained on the scene for about of the Mount when southerly winds also hectares of bracken and scrub on five hours until 9.00pm before it was then swept the fire towards the summit. Mount Buninyong on the afternoon declared to be extinguished, although a “In many parts of the world there have of Melbourne Cup Day is believed to few hot spots remained. been reports of fires deliberately lit by have been deliberately lit. Detectives from the Ballarat CIB are anti 5-G activists who believe there is a Twelve CFA tankers and other vehicles investigating reports that a person was link between mobile phone towers and were used to fight the blaze assisted by seen leaving the scene soon after the fire the Covid virus,” he said. the Helitack 376 helicopter. was spotted. Buninyong CFA Communications Officer The fire was started over a considerable Towers target John McLeod said that the local CFA distance along a walking track on the top A resident living nearby said that he believed brigade had been called to a spate of of the on the north side of the mountain that given the blustery northerly winds, deliberately-lit fires in the district recently. near Hogarths Lane West. Local CFA the fire was intended to reach the tele- Two were lit in the Whitehorse Road, Mount brigade Lieutenant Matthew O’Brien said communications towers at the summit of Clear area, in the early hours on 15 that crews had to wait for the fire to burn the Mount.
    [Show full text]
  • Barunah Plains Homestead, Outbuildings and Garden Hamilton Highway, Hesse, Via Inverleigh, Wingeel Lot No
    Golden Plains Shire Heritage Database DRAFT Database No. 66 Barunah Plains Homestead, Outbuildings and Garden Hamilton Highway, Hesse, via Inverleigh, Wingeel Lot No. Plan No. Municipal Rate No. Architectural Style Designer(s) Contractor(s) National Estate Register, 2003. Legislative RegistersNominated Registered Other Registers Registered Victorian Heritage Register No. National Estate RNE - Database 15759 Heritage Inventory No. RNE Legal Status Registered Precinct Heritage Overlay No. National Trust (Vic.) File G13123, B1126 Precinct Heritage Overlay Nam Nat. Trust Classification Individual Heritage Overlay No. HO20 Statement of Significance National Estate Register: Barunah Plains is a late nineteenth century homestead development and is important for exhibiting a rich array of cultural features as follows: a collection of bluestone buildings including the homestead and outbuildings; and a homestead garden and parkland with a large attractively crafted timber gate, a timber pedestrian bridge, shrubberies, a sunken croquet lawn, a rose garden and mature trees (Criterion A.3). Barunah Plains has a strong and long association with the grazing history of the western district, and thus with a major chapter of the history of Victoria (Criterion A.4). The range of structures on the property, including bakery, laundry, cottages, implement shed, stables, coach house, woolshed and ram building, is important for the way it reflects a functioning western district sheep property founded in the nineteenth century. Additionally, the ram shed and the gate providing entry to the garden and park are unusual features. The garden is also important as an example of the Gardenesque design style, exhibiting the following style characteristics: a dominance of shrubberies with minimal lawn area; use of gravel paths; and use of trees with distinctive form as features (Criterion B.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Charities
    lSSL . VICTORIA. PUBLIC CHARITIES. REPORT OF INSPECTOR FOR THE HALF-YEAR ENDED 301'H .JUNE 1881, · AND ROUGH DRAFT OF PROPOSED AMENDING BILL; TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL REPORTS. PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY'S COMMAND. 15~ ~utbotifl! : JOHN FERRES, GOVER~MENT PRINTEU1. MELBOURNE. No 23 . ,. Al'Pl!OXJMATE COST OF REPORTS. ... £ 8, ll• Propafa.tion, &c.-Not given. E'rintlng (V25 copces) 85 10 0 . PUBLIC ·CHARITIES OF .VICTORIA, '/' Inspector's Office, Treasury, 25th July 1881. Sm, . I do myself. the honor• to submit a half-y~r's Report of my ~ork. as Inspector of; .Public Charities. : $ince my appointment· to that position I have inspected the following charities :-'·· ' .. .. :-' . · ·HospitalS'.-Melbourne, Alfred, . Homreopathic, Inglewood, Creswick, Dayl'esford, Clunes, Amherst, Maryborough, Maldon, Dunolly, St. Aruaud's, Kilmore, Heathcote; Bendigo, Castlemaine, Ovens, Ballarat, :-· ··, Mooroopna; and Wangaratta. · J:$enmmlerit' Asy(ums.-Melbourne, Bendigo, Castlemaine, Ballarat; Ovens,. ' and the Home of the Immigrants' Aid Society in Melbourne. Other Institutions.-· Melbourne Blind Asylum, Ballanit Orphan Asylum, . Ballarat Refuge. Also the accounts of the following societies :- ·;," · Clunes, · Creswick~ Ballarat Clothing, Daylesford, Eaglehawk, Kilmore, 1 · Maldon, St. Arnaud, Maryborough, Talbot, and Buninyong. , Of the.'benevolent· ·societi~s it will suffice to say generally that they are doing ' .I l ' . good work in a most ·economical manner, and that, with one or two exceptions, the a~co~nts are well' kept. My reports upon the i~stitutions inspected will appropriately constitute appendices to this Report. The. Royal Commission, .in recommending the appointment of an Inspector of Public Charities, said, " What appears to be desirable is that the :whole management of _each ch~1jty, shol!-ld p~ P,erioqically investiga:teq, an? .a regular audit at the same time r'n.~~e o_n·he~alf, not _of_ ~h~.,~~bscribers, .~ut of the State, and.
    [Show full text]
  • Gee Long Investigation Area
    DEVELOPMENT AREAS ACT 1973 GEE LONG INVESTIGATION AREA . '.• 711. 4099 . 452 GEE:V r---------------. ~eM~ oEPAR1MENT-0F '{ I PLANN\NG- L\BRAR ~~~~i~l~ii~iil~~ .'J g~~STRY FOR PLANNING 71 3 7 M0002826 ANQ EN)LIBONME!il J.,JBBABY I DEVELOPMENT AREAS ACT 1973 I G E E L 0 N G I N V E S T I G A T I 0 N A R E A I (Municipal districts of City of Geelong, City of Geelong West, City of Newtown, Borough of Queenscliffe, Shire of Bannockburn, Shire of Bellarine and parts of the municipal districts of Shire of Corio, City of South Barwon and Shire I of Barrabool). I REPORT CONTENTS I PAGE I Chapter 1 Surrmary 1-2 Chapter 2 Bac~ground to the Study 3.:.6 I Chapter 3 The Geelong Region 7-13 Chapter 4 . Pl arini ng Po 1icy, Submissions and En vi ronmenta 1 14-17 I Considerations Chapter 5 Goals and Objectives for the Geelong Region 18-20 I Chapter 6 Constraints on Development 21-32 I· Chapter 7 Location of Growth in the Region 33-34 Chapter 8 Development of a Regional Strategy 35-42 I Chapter 9 Management and Implementation 43-46 Chap~er 10 Recommendation 47 I Chapter 11 Requirements of the Development Areas Act 48-53 I APPENDICES 1. Sites of Aboriginal Relics 54 I 2. Submissions Received Regarding Geelong Investigation 55 Area I 3. Register of Historic Buildings - Geelong Region 56 I 4. Sites of Special Scientific Interest 57-59 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 60 I TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD :I 22ND SEPTEMBER, 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Story of the Canadian Corridor
    A short story of the Canadian Corridor The Flora and Fauna “Messmate Stringybark-Peppermint type forest dominates the vegetatation. Interesting understorey flora include nine acacia species, attractive stands of Cherry Ballarat and various cassinas, parrot peas, milkwort and daisies. The herb layer includes a variety of orchid species, chocolate lilies, bluebells and violets whilst grass trees are common throughout the Forest” “Surveys have recorded the Grass skink, Blue tongue lizard and Mouse Dunnart. The Koala is occasionally seen and the Swamp Wallaby may venture into the forest from adjacent bushland. Considering the central location, bird life is unexpectedly plentiful due mainly to the nearby Yarrowee River Vegeation. Various honeyeaters, thornbills, White-throated Treecreeper, Scarlet Robin, White-winged Chough and Grey Fantail are often seen.” Ref (1) The Wadawurrung The Wadawurrung have lived in the area for thousands of generations, there are many areas of cultural and archaeological significance to Wadawurrung People within the region, indicating a significant level of activity of the Wadawurrung People. At the time of colonisation, three of the twenty five Wadawurrung clans lived in the vicinity of the Eureka diggings and the Canadian Forest: the Burrumbeet balug at Lakes Burrumbeet and Learmonth, Keyeet balug, a sub-group of the Burrumbeet balug, at Mt Buninyong, and the Tooloora balug, at Mt Warrenheip and Lal Lal Creek. At present, the descendants of the last known Apical Ancestor of Wadawurrung People are represented by the Wathaurung Aboriginal Corporation (Wadawurrung), who were formally recognised by the State Government as the Traditional Owners of Wadawurrung Country in May 2009, under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Fyansford Monier Arch Bridge
    ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA CEREMONY REPORT Fyansford Monier Arch Bridge Heritage Recognition Ceremony Fyansford, 4 km west of Geelong, Victoria Friday 12 October 2012 2 Cover Photograph: 56Unveiling of the interpretation panel and marker at Fyansford Monier Arch Bridge on 12 October 2012. The official party which has just unveiled the panel and marker are grouped closely around the panel. From left: Mr Mario Fantin, Principal Bridge Engineer, VicRoads; Councillor Madeleine McManus, member of National Council, Engineers Australia and Councillor John Mitchell, Mayor of City of Greater Geelong. Image: Owen Peake 3 CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 4 2 Invitations 4 3 Distinguished Guests and Apologies 4 4 Program and Running Sheet 4 5 Speech Notes 5 6 Ceremony Handout 5 7 Media Release 5 8 Media Articles 5 9 Letters of Thanks 5 10 Costing 7 11 Allocation of Tasks 8 12 Interpretation Panel 8 13 Photographs 10 Attachment 1 - Invitation Letter 14 Attachment 2 - Advertising Flyer 15 Attachment 3 - Running Sheet 16 Attachment 4 - Handout Document 20 Attachment 5 - EHA Newsletter Article 28 Attachment 6 - EV Magazine Article 30 Attachment 7 - EA Magazine Article 32 Attachment 8 - Speech Notes - Councillor Madeleine McManus 34 Attachment 9 - Speech Notes - Mayor Councillor John Mitchell 37 Attachment 10 - Speech Notes - Mr Brendan Grace 39 Attachment 11 - Body of typical thank you letter 43 4 1 Introduction: The ceremony for the marking of the Fyansford Monier Arch Bridge with an ENGINEERING HERITAGE MARKER were conducted at on 12 October 2012 at the bridge site at 3 pm. Attendance: 62 2 Invitations: There were two forms of invitation: 2.1 Written invitation (see Attachment 1) sent by mail to 130 people listed by Engineering Heritage Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Plains Heritage Study Stage 2
    Golden Plains Heritage Study Stage Two Volume 1: Final Report Prepared by Heritage Matters Pty Ltd for the Golden Plains Shire October 2009 The Golden Plains Heritage Study was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Victorian State Government. The study is commissioned by the Golden Plains Shire. ii Golden Plains Heritage Study Stage Two, Final Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Introduction 5 Recommendations 5 Adoption of the Golden Plains Heritage Study Stage Two 5 Recommendations for proposed Heritage Precincts and Individual Heritage Places 5 Recommendations for the Victoria Heritage Register 9 Golden Plains Shire Planning Scheme 9 Guidelines for the Assessment of Heritage Planning Applications (2007) 9 Guidelines for the management of Street Trees and Avenues of Honour 9 1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Background to the study area 10 1.2 Background to the Golden Plains Heritage Study 10 Protection for heritage places administered at a Local Government level 10 Protection for heritage places administered at a State Government level 11 1.3 Terminology 11 1.4 Timing 12 1.5 Constraints and limitations 12 1.6 Acknowledgements 13 2 METHODOLOGY 15 2.1 Project Purpose 15 2.2 Study Requirements 15 2.3 Study Requirement One 16 2.3.1 Community Consultation 16 2.4 Study Requirement Two 17 2.4.1 Research, assessment, peer-testing and data-entry 17 2.4.2 Heritage Citation Reports (datasheets) 18 2.4.3 Physical Evidence 18 2.4.4 Historical Evidence 18 2.4.5 Assessing Significance 18 2.4.6 Statement of Significance 18 2.4.7 Defining
    [Show full text]