DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin Pdf, Epub, Ebook OPERATION BARBAROSSA 1941: HITLER AGAINST STALIN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Christer Bergstrom | 300 pages | 20 Jun 2016 | Casemate Books | 9781612004013 | English | Havertown, United States Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin PDF Book The commissars held a position equal to that of the commander of the unit they were overseeing. But most of the multitude of isolated units fought on stubbornly until running out of ammunition. Why did Stalin ignore the yearlong military buildup in eastern Europe and the by one count 87 separate, credible intelligence warnings of the German invasion that he received during —41? Hitler might actually strike first! Embassy or Consulate and ask for the information to be passed to a U. See details. However the author also makes it clear that many of the worst offenders were the non-Russian inhabitants of the western Soviet Union, including the Ukraine and the Baltics, where anti-Communism and anti-Semitism were common. Minneapolis: Zenith Press. Clarendon Press. The battlefields portrayed here long possessed military significance for the Germans and the peoples of Eastern Europe. Stalin took his final step to power on May 5, when he added the title of Soviet Premier to that of Communist Party Chairman. In rain and thaw on 12 December, German 2nd Panzer Division was ousted from Solnechogorsk — having been pushed back 40 km since the Soviet counter-offensive began. Oxford University Press. New York: Vintage. May God aid us, especially in this fight! Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union, thereby virtually abandoning his war with Britain and France at the very moment that he seemed about to achieve victory? But the Soviet dictator reacted inconsistently. Barbarossa was eventually defeated, but not until four years had passed and tens of millions had died. Follow DrJohnRickard. The Journal of Modern History. But in fact, the Germans were able to ward off the Soviet attacks during these incredibly low temperature days. The Soviet counter-offensives in December caused heavy casualties on both sides, but ultimately eliminated the German threat to Moscow. We are absolutely convinced that if we conclude a mutual assistance pact with France and Great Britain, Germany will back off from Poland and seek a modus vivendi with the Western Powers. For this reason, it is imperative that we agree to conclude the pact proposed by Germany, and then work in such a way that this war, once it is declared, will be prolonged maximally. Hitler, having realized that Germany's oil supply was "severely depleted", [] aimed to capture the oil fields of Baku in an offensive, codenamed Case Blue. New York: Harper Collins. It was too late. People from nearly every country share information with CIA, and new individuals contact us daily. Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin Writer The Hunger Plan outlined how entire urban populations of conquered territories was to be starved to death, thus creating an agricultural surplus to feed Germany and urban space for the German upper class. North-Western Front. Despite the parties' ostensibly cordial relations, each side was highly suspicious of the other's intentions. His poorly equipped, trained, and led soldiers were ordered to stand their ground regardless of the consequences. This brings us to the next myth…. Stalin used the Great Terror to eliminate potential threats within the Soviet military. Carl Gnam. In , Hitler took steps to guard his southern flank against a hostile attack in the coming war on Soviet Russia and convinced Bulgaria and Yugoslavia to join the Tripartite Pact. By this point German combat effectiveness had reached its apogee; in training, doctrine, and fighting ability, the forces invading Russia represented the finest army to fight in the twentieth century. The two panzer armies now trapped four Soviet armies and parts of two others. Steury The German invasion of the Soviet Union in June was one of the pivotal events of the 20th century. Kshyk also notes the problems due to the still limited access to Soviet archives, and emotional nature of debate due to national pride, political and personal motivations of participants. Stalin took his final step to power on May 5, when he added the title of Soviet Premier to that of Communist Party Chairman. Assuming they are genuine, they add to what is perhaps the most bewildering paradox of the Soviet-German war: Stalin, the man who trusted no one, trusted Hitler. We cannot guarantee a response to every message. He argued that Soviet ground forces were well-organized and mobilized en masse along the German—Soviet frontier for a Soviet invasion of Europe slated for Sunday, July 6, but were unprepared to defend their own territory. Stalin had given the cold-blooded order that retreat would not be tolerated, and as a result, nearly one million men were lost in the fighting. He directed a few top generals to covertly draft battle plans. Commanded by Lieutenant General M. His decision to decapitate the Red Army had left him with meek and inexperienced combat leadership. The 45th Infantry Division was encircled and partially destroyed. After the first successful flight by the Wright brothers in , the age of aviation was born, and by army commanders in the United States and Europe began ordering aircraft and experimenting with them. Furthermore we had had a very wet spring; the Bug and its tributaries were at flood level until well into May and the nearby ground was swampy and almost impassable. Annihilation in the Ukraine Minneapolis: Zenith Press. The German attack achieved shocking results during its opening stages, leaving Stalin depressed, disheveled, and drunk. Meltyukhov, Mikhail Ivanovich. That allowed Stalin to provide the expansive build-up of the Red Army. Soon after, the Soviet forces counterattacked along the entire front. Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin Reviews As the war continued, the Germans gradually lost their numerical superiority — which reflects the greater Soviet industrial capacity — but their most brilliant victories in were achieved with a convincing numerical superiority. Inside Hitler's High Command. The Red Army General Staff naturally had contingency plans for an attack against Germany, but there is no evidence that these had any effect on German planning. Grant Robert E. The poorly led Soviet troops who were not killed or captured buckled under the German onslaught. New York: Berghahn Books. There was considerable complexity to German troop movements in eastern Europe, as I have argued elsewhere. On 6 July, the Soviets launched a massive counter-attack using the V and VII Mechanized Corps of the 20th Army, [] which collided with the German 39th and 47th Panzer Corps in a battle where the Red Army lost tanks of the 2, employed during five days of ferocious fighting. Significant amounts of Soviet territory were lost along with Red Army forces as a result; it took several days before Stalin comprehended the magnitude of the calamity. For the campaign against the Soviet Union, the Germans allotted almost divisions containing a total of about three million men. Javascript must be enabled for the correct page display Library. Taken together with these general occupation practices and its brutal treatment of Soviet POWs an army responsibility , the spring of marks the date when Germany began to sink irretrievably toward Auschwitz. The battlefields portrayed here long possessed military significance for the Germans and the peoples of Eastern Europe. Notes: first digit — total number of divisions; second digit — tank divisions; third — motorized divisions [73]. Despite these early successes, the German offensive stalled in the Battle of Moscow at the end of , and the subsequent Soviet winter counteroffensive pushed German troops back. Glantz , pp. The Soviet counter-offensives in December caused heavy casualties on both sides, but ultimately eliminated the German threat to Moscow. London: Allen Lane. Luftwaffe reconnaissance units plotted Soviet troop concentration, supply dumps and airfields, and marked them down for destruction. The purges hit the higher ranks worst. On 7 August it captured Kestenga while reaching the outskirts of Ukhta. The things that had worked so brilliantly for him in Europe could not work in Russia, and he found that he had met his match in Stalin. WWII Quarterly, the hardcover journal of the Second World War that is not available in bookstores or on newsstands, and can only be obtained and collected through a personal subscription through the mail. Ukraine , enlarged eastwards to the Volga. Penguin Books. That allowed Stalin to provide the expansive build-up of the Red Army. There is also a widespread myth that Jews were not sexually assaulted by Germans. In late August , Hitler and Stalin stunned the world by announcing that their two nations had agreed to a trade and nonaggression pact. By the end of August, 4th Panzer Group had penetrated to within 48 kilometres 30 miles of Leningrad. The Germans had serious deficiencies. It is often said that one of the main reasons the Germans were defeated [by the Soviet Union] in the battle of Moscow in December is the worn out state of their forces. The army marching on Moscow was ordered to halt while their panzer division was diverted to deal with troublesome resistance to the north and south, and they only resumed their advance in early October. On August 23, — shortly before World War II broke out in Europe—enemies Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union surprised the world by signing the German- Soviet Nonaggression Pact, in which the two countries agreed to take no military action against each other for the During German-Finnish negotiations Finland had demanded to remain neutral unless the Soviet Union attacked them first. Ruthlessly consolidating power, Stalin purged some 25, officers from his military during the s. Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler Against Stalin Read Online This specific law on mobilization allowed the Red Army to increase its army of 1,, men in to 5,, in the spring of under secrecy to avoid alarming the rest of the world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Turning Point of World War Ii?
    WHAT WAS THE TURNING POINT OF WORLD WAR II? Jeff Moore History 420: Senior Seminar December 13, 2012 1 World War II was the decisive war of the twentieth century. Millions of people lost their lives in the fighting. Hitler and the Nazis were eventually stopped in their attempt to dominate Europe, but at a great cost to everyone. Looking back at the war, it is hard to find the definitive moment when the war could no longer be won by the Axis, and it is even more difficult to find the exact moment when the tide of the war turned. This is because there are so many moments that could be argued as the turning point of World War II. Different historians pose different arguments as to what this moment could be. Most agree that the turning point of World War II, in military terms, was either Operation Barbarossa or the Battle of Stalingrad. UCLA professor Robert Dallek, Third Reich and World War II specialist Richard Overy, and British journalist and historian Max Hastings, all argue that Stalingrad was the point of the war in which everything changed.1 The principal arguments surrounding this specific battle are that it was the furthest east that Germany ever made it, and after the Russian victory Stalin’s forces were able to gain the confidence and momentum necessary to push the Germans back to the border. On the other hand, Operation Barbarossa is often cited as the turning point for World War II because the Germans did not have the resources necessary to survive a prolonged invasion of Russia fighting both the Red Army and the harsh Russian weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Week Beginning 1St June Title: Why Did Operation Barbarossa Fail?
    Lesson 1 – week beginning 1st June Title: Why did Operation Barbarossa fail? WHY DID OPERATION BARBAROSSA FAIL? ‘When Barbarossa commences, the world will hold its breath,’ Hitler said of his bold plan to invade the Soviet Union. The scale of the campaign was certainly huge. Hitler assembled 3 million troops, 3500 tanks and 2700 aircraft for ‘Operation Barbarossa’ - the German code name for the attack on Russia. Why did Hitler break the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact? Hitler invaded the Soviet Union on the 22nd June 1941, ordering his troops to ‘flatten Russia like a hailstorm’. The reasons for the invasion were a mixture of the military and the political. Hitler needed Russia's plentiful raw materials to support his army and population. There was oil in the Caucasus (southern Russia) and wheat in the Ukraine. He was also obsessed by racial ideas. The Russians, he believed, were an inferior ‘Slav’ race which would offer no real resistance (i.e. they wouldn’t be able to fight back) to ‘racially superior’ Germans. Russia's fertile plains could provide even more Lebensraum (living space) than Poland. Russia was also at the heart of world communism, and Hitler detested communists. The Russian Red Army had done very badly during its brief war with Finland in the winter of 1939 – 40. This convinced Hitler the Soviet Union and its Red Army could be beaten in four months. His confidence was also boosted by the fact that in the late 1930s, Stalin, the Soviet dictator, had shot 35,000 officers (43% of all his officers) in ‘purges’ of the Red (Russian) Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Play
    Rodger B. MacGowan © 2018 2nd Edition Rules of Play © 2021 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www.GMTGames.com 2 Hitler’s Reich 2nd Edition ~ Rules of Play TABLE O F CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................3 9.3 Fleet Action ...................................................................12 About These Rules .................................................................3 9.4 Planning Action .............................................................12 Important Game Terms and Concepts .................................3 Contested Actions ..........................................................13 1.0 Components ......................................................................4 9.5 Event Action ..................................................................13 9.6 Attack Action .................................................................13 2.0 The Cards .........................................................................4 9.6.1 Land Attack ..............................................................13 2.1 The Conflict Decks ..........................................................4 9.6.2 Paratroop Attack .......................................................14 2.1.1 Conflict Card Hand Size ...............................................4 9.6.3 Amphibious Attack ...................................................14 2.1.2 Suits and Ties .............................................................5 9.6.4 Sea Zone Attack .......................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • A War of Reputation and Pride
    A War of reputation and pride - An examination of the memoirs of German generals after the Second World War. HIS 4090 Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Spring 2019 1 “For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy, 19621 1John F. Kennedy, Yale University Commencement Address, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkyalecommencement.htm, [01.05.2019]. 2 Acknowledgments This master would not have been written without the help and support of my mother, father, friends and my better half, thank you all for your support. I would like to thank the University Library of Oslo and the British Library in London for providing me with abundant books and articles. I also want to give huge thanks to the Military Archive in Freiburg and their employees, who helped me find the relevant materials for this master. Finally, I would like to thank my supervisor at the University of Oslo, Professor Kim Christian Priemel, who has guided me through the entire writing process from Autumn 2017. Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse, Oslo, 01.05.2019 3 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………...………... 7 Chapter 1, Theory and background………………………………………………..………17 1.1 German Military Tactics…………………………………………………..………. 17 1.1.1 Blitzkrieg, Kesselschlacht and Schwerpunkt…………………………………..……. 17 1.1.2 Examples from early campaigns……………………………………………..……… 20 1.2 The German attack on the USSR (1941)……………………………..…………… 24 1.2.1 ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, war of annihilation………………………………...………….. 24 1.2.2 Operation Barbarossa………………………………………………..……………… 28 1.2.3 Operation Typhoon…………………………………………………..………………. 35 1.2.4 The strategic situation, December 1941…………………………….……………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Moscow
    Centre for Comparative and Public History Department of History Chinese University of Hong Kong In-Service Teacher Training Course Conflicts and Cooperation in the Twentieth-Century World Lecture 3:3: “World War II” Source 6 The Battle of Moscow Context: To the German Fuhrer Adolf Hitler, Moscow was the key to bringing about the surrender of the Soviet Union. From October 1941 to January 1942, the Soviet capital served as the key battle ground between the German Wehrmacht and the Soviet Red Army. The successful defense of Moscow became a rallying point for opponents of the Axis and sowed seeds of mistrust and dissension at German military headquarters. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Battle_of_moscow05.jpg Questions: 1. Given Germany’s remarkable success in the first two years of World War II, how were the Allies able to turn the tide and defeat the Nazi forces? 2. What advances in technologies and tactics altered military tactics and outcomes during World War II. Assignment: Divide the class into groups and assign them each a notable World War II military battle or campaign, e.g. the invasion of Poland (Operation Fall Weiss), Battle of France (Fall Gelb), Battle of Britain (plus Operation Sealion), Siege of Leningrad, Battle of Moscow, North African Campaign (the Desert War), Battle of Sicily, Battle of Normandy, Battle of the Bulge, Battle of Berlin. Require each group to report on the combatants’ tactics, the importance of the encounter, and the outcome. Their reports can be fashioned in a variety of ways - dispatches to headquarters, letters to relatives, or newspaper accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2018 German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941 David Sutton University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Sutton, David, German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Combat Series: Case Blue V2 (11 May, 2012) ©2012
    The Gamers, Inc. Operational Combat Series: Case Blue v2 (11 May, 2012) ©2012. Multi-Man Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents Game Design: Dean Essig Series Design: Dean Essig Combining GBII & CB Case Blue Rules 2 General Rules Playtesting: Michael Affeldt, Perry I The Counters 8 Axis Special Rules Andrus, Jeff Behan, Thomas Buettner, 10 Soviet Special Rules Steve Campbell, Jim Daniels, Don Evans, The following counters in the Case Blue 12 GBII Special Rules Andrew Fischer, Michael Junkin, John set modify GBII counters from the 2001 14 Strategic Victory Kisner, Morris Hadley, Matthias Hardel, edition. In order to bring your consolidated 14 Optional Rules John Hart, Dirk Heinz, Roland LeBlanc, counters in line with what they should have, 15 Experimental Rules Dave Mignerey, Rod Miller, Rick Robinson, do the following: 21 Design Notes & Player Notes Pedro Santos, Jim Stavers, Colin du Toit, 1) Remove all aircraft from GBII and 29 Abbreviations Bruce Webb only use the ones in Case Blue. These 30 Common Rebuild Table Russian Placenames: Kevin Caldwell have been redrawn to be graphically 31 Terrain Effects superior to the old ones and Case Blue Rules Proofing: Mark Fisher, Hans Korting, contains a complete replacement set. Russian Booklet Joe Linder 2) Replace the German 20-4-3 Inf Div 1 Weather Table v2 Rewrite Special Thanks: John Kisner, (707) with 15-4-3 Inf Div (707). The 2 Soviet Repls & Rail Caps who coordinated the effort and did the 707th ID was a later wave unit with a 3 Supply Table heavy lifting to get it done.
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND's RELATIONS with the SOVIET UNION, 1940-1952 By
    FINLAND'S RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION, 1940-1952 by HANS PETER KROSBY B.A., University of British Columbia, 1955 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in INTERNATIONAL STUDIES We accept this Thesis as conforming to the required standard: UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1958 ABSTRACT In March 194-0, Finland had just completed another life and death struggle with the Soviet Union, the second such struggle since Bolshevik autocracy- replaced Tsarist autocracy in Russia in 1917. During the following fifteen months, Soviet diplomacy endeavoured to complete the job which the Red Army had "begun. By a unilateral and extremely liberal interpretation of the Peace Treaty of March 12, 1940, the Soviet Union tried to isolate Finland from her other neighbours and to establish a favourable basis for a complete annexation of Finland in the manner of the three Baltic States. Surrounded by Soviet and German military might, and noticing the increasing friction in the Nazi-Soviet alliance, Finland, in order to save herself from an imminent Soviet invasion, grasped the only straw which seemed to offer some hope: a transit agreement for German troops from Finland's Bothnian coast to Kirkenes in oc• cupied Norway. The resulting presence of German troops in the country did save Finland from becoming the seventeenth Soviet Socialist Republic in 1940 or 194-1* but it also involved her deeply in the Nazi-Soviet conflict which followed. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 194-1, Finland tried in vain to have her neutrality respected, and she was attacked by Soviet forces three days after the German aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Front
    OVERVIEW ESSAY THE EASTERN FRONT (Wikimedia Commons.) The US involvement in the European theater After Germany invaded Poland in September of operations was mainly confined to western 1939, Soviet troops moved into parts of Europe and Italy, but some of the war’s most eastern Europe, occupying 286,000 square savage fighting occurred on the Eastern Front, miles of territory containing 20 million people. where the Axis powers had set out to conquer This action was permitted under the terms the Balkan Peninsula and the immense reaches of the nonaggression pact, but it endangered of the Soviet Union. More combatants were Hitler’s plans for expansion eastward. “The killed on the Eastern Front than in all other sooner Russia is smashed the better,” he told theaters of World War II combined. These his generals. bitterly contested, racial battles (Adolf Hitler had vowed to exterminate the eastern Slavs) On June 22, 1941, Hitler took his greatest prevented Germany from mounting a more gamble, unleashing Operation Barbarossa, a resolute defense against Allied armies in three million-man invasion of the Soviet Union. Normandy, and later, on the Reich’s western The invasion was spectacularly effective in its borders. early stages. By September, the Red Army had sustained some 2.5 million casualties. But it As early as 1923, when Hitler authored turned out to be a fatal mistake. The Soviet Mein Kampf, he believed Germany’s destiny Union was one of only two countries (the other lay in defeating its historic enemy, France, was the United States) Germany could not and pushing eastward into the Soviet Union, defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Tank Development During the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected]
    Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Undergraduate Theses Spring 2019 Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses Part of the History Commons CU Commons Citation Paugh, Jeremy, "Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War" (2019). Undergraduate Theses. 185. https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses/185 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HST 493- Steel Monsters: Soviet Armor Development During World War 2 A senior thesis submitted to The Department of History College of Arts & Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in History By: Jeremy Paugh Faculty Supervisor ______________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Joel Davis Date Department Chair _______________________________________________ _____________ Kimberly Knutsen Date Dean, College of Arts & Sciences ________________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Michael Thomas Date Provost _______________________________________________________ _____________ Michelle Cowing Date Concordia University Portland, Oregon May, 2018 1 Abstract: This thesis aims to explore the far-reaching effects of armored warfare and tank
    [Show full text]
  • 4-08 Guderian's Blitzkrieg II
    4-08 Guderian’s Blitzkrieg II - 2011 (14 Nov 18) 11. Between 22 Feb and 29 March the Axis receives lots The Case Blue rules supersede those in GBII. To of Pax and Eq. Treat them like extra repls (not exclusive eliminate the need for multiple rulebooks, applicable to GBII), rolling to see which map set each is sent to. GBII rules are replicated in Case Blue, which is designed 12. Ju-52 counts. If you are a stickler for consistency, the to cover both Case Blue and GBII. Your GBII rulebook GBII campaigns that begin in 11/41, 12/41, 1/42, and will only be needed for GBII area scenarios setups that 11/42 should all have just 2x Ju-52, with none in are not included in Case Blue. Please download the Emergency Pool. Replace the Arrival Schedule’s transfer Case Blue rules on The Gamers Archive site. of 1x Ju-52 from GBII to EatG on 26 Nov 1942 with a transfer of 2x Ju-52 from CB to EatG. 1. On Sheet 2, the 6-3-2 Security Division (203) has a 13. Rule 4.2a (part of Moscow: The Big Plum) is no Sausage on its front side. Players will need to make their longer in sync with the charts and tables. Ignore 4.2a, own replacement. Also note that directly beneath this and just go with the DRMs on the charts! counter there should be a Sausage both front and back (there is no 203 Sec Bde, so ignore that counter). Map 2.
    [Show full text]