DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Calendar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Calendar S. PRT. 111–61 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 2009–2010 CONVENED JANUARY 6, 2009 FIRST SESSION ! ADJOURNED DECEMBER 24, 2009 CONVENED JANUARY 5, 2010 SECOND SESSION ! ADJOURNED DECEMBER 22, 2010 FINAL CALENDAR 63–765 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office U.S. Government Pinting Office, Washington, DC 20402 VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:07 Feb 12, 2011 Jkt 063765 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7800 Sfmt 7800 E:\HR\OC\63765.XXX 63765 smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HEARING CONTENTS Page Members of the Committee on Armed Services .................................................................................................. 3 Subcommittees of the Committee on Armed Services ......................................................................................... 5 Staff of the Committee on Armed Services ......................................................................................................... 19 Rules of Procedure of the Committee on Armed Services .................................................................................. 21 Listing of all Senate bills and resolutions referred to Committee on Armed Services ...................................... 23 Listing of all House bills and resolutions referred to Committee on Armed Services ....................................... 27 Senate bills ............................................................................................................................................................. 30 Senate concurrent resolutions ................................................................................................................................ 51 Senate joint resolutions .......................................................................................................................................... 52 Senate resolutions .................................................................................................................................................. 53 Summary of Committee on Armed Services funding for inquiries and investigations ...................................... 55 House bills ............................................................................................................................................................. 57 House concurrent resolutions ................................................................................................................................ 60 House joint resolutions .......................................................................................................................................... 61 Index, by subject, of all bills and resolutions ....................................................................................................... 62 Index, by author, of Senate bills and resolutions ................................................................................................. 65 Index, by report numbers, of all bills, resolutions, nominations and inquiries reported to the Senate .............. 73 Index by conference report numbers ..................................................................................................................... 74 Index by public law number, private law number or veto message .................................................................... 75 Committee prints .................................................................................................................................................... 76 Investigations, hearings, and other matters not directly pertaining to legislation before the Committee on Armed Services ............................................................................................................................................ 77 2009 action on nominations referred to Committee on Armed Services ............................................................ 80 2010 action on nominations referred to Committee on Armed Services ............................................................ 82 Subcommittee appointments and hearings ............................................................................................................ 83 Boards of Visitors to the Military, Naval, and Air Force Academies ................................................................. 86 2 VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:07 Feb 12, 2011 Jkt 063765 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 7801 Sfmt 7801 E:\HR\OC\63765.XXX 63765 smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES MEMBERSHIP FROM JANUARY 21, 2009 - DECEMBER 22, 2010 CARL LEVIN, MICHIGAN, Chairman January 23, 1979* JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, CONNECTICUT JOHN MCCAIN, ARIZONA January 7, 1993* January 6, 1987* JACK REED, RHODE ISLAND JAMES M. INHOFE, OKLAHOMA January 7, 1999* January 4, 1995* DANIEL K. AKAKA, HAWAII JEFF SESSIONS, ALABAMA January 25, 2001* January 7, 1999* BILL NELSON, FLORIDA SAXBY CHAMBLISS, GEORGIA January 25, 2001* January 15, 2003* E. BENJAMIN NELSON, NEBRASKA LINDSEY GRAHAM, SOUTH CAROLINA January 25, 2001* January 15, 2003* EVAN BAYH, INDIANA JOHN THUNE, SOUTH DAKOTA January 15, 2003* January 6, 2005* JIM WEBB, VIRGINIA ROGER F. WICKER, MISSISSIPPI January 12, 2007* January 24, 2008* CLAIRE MCCASKILL, MISSOURI GEORGE S. LEMIEUX, FLORIDA January 12, 2007* September 22, 2009* MARK UDALL, COLORADO SCOTT P. BROWN, MASSACHUSETTS January 21, 2009* March 2, 2010* KAY R. HAGAN, NORTH CAROLINA RICHARD BURR, NORTH CAROLINA January 21, 2009* January 21, 2009* MARK BEGICH, ALASKA DAVID VITTER, LOUISIANA January 21, 2009* January 21, 2009* JEFF BINGAMAN, NEW MEXICO SUSAN M. COLLINS, MAINE March 9, 2010* January 25, 2001* JOE MANCHIN III, WEST VIRGINIA MARK KIRK, ILLINOIS November 15, 2010* December 7, 2010* CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, DELAWARE November 15, 2010* *Date of appointment to the Senate Committee on Armed Services. NOTES: The Senate Committees on Military Affairs; on the Militia; and Naval Affairs were established on December 10, 1816. The Committee on the Militia was merged with the Committee on Military Affairs in 1858 to form the Military Affairs and Militia Committee. However, in 1872 the Committee dropped ‘‘Militia’’ from its name. The Military Affairs and Naval Affairs Committees existed until 1947 when they were combined by the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 into a new standing committee, the current Committee on Armed Services. Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until his death on August 25, 2009. Senator Mel Martinez of Florida served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until the date of his resignation from the Senate on September 8, 2009. On September 22, 2009, the Senate passed S. Res. 279, appointing Senator George S. LeMieux of Florida to the Committee on Armed Services. On September 29, 2009, the Senate passed S. Res. 290, appointing Senator Paul G. Kirk of Massachusetts to the Committee on Armed Services. Senator Paul G. Kirk of Massachusetts served on the Committee from September 29, 2009 until February 4, 2010. On March 2, 2010, the Senate passed S. Res. 429, appointing Senator Scott P. Brown of Massachusetts to the Committee on Armed Services. On March 9, 2010, the Senate passed S. Res. 450, appointing Senators Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico and Edward E. Kaufman of Delaware to the Committee on Armed Services. Senator Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until his death on June 28, 2010. On July 22, 2010, the Senate passed S. Res. 594, appointing Senator Carte P. Goodwin of West Virginia to the Committee 3 VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:07 Feb 12, 2011 Jkt 063765 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7801 Sfmt 7801 E:\HR\OC\63765.XXX 63765 smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HEARING on Armed Services. Senator Edward E. Kaufman, Delaware, served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from March 9, 2010 until November 15, 2010. Senator Carte P. Goodwin, West Virginia, served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from July 22, 2010 until November 15, 2010. On November 15, 2010, the Senate passed S. Res. 674, appointing Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Senator Christopher A. Coons of Delaware to the Committee on Armed Services. Senator Roland W. Burris of Illinois served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until he was succeeded by Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois on November 29, 2010. On December 7, 2010, the Senate passed S. Res. 696, appointing Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois to the Committee on Armed Services. 4 VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:07 Feb 12, 2011 Jkt 063765 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7801 Sfmt 7801 E:\HR\OC\63765.XXX 63765 smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with HEARING ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SUBCOMMITTEES OF COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES FEBRUARY 24, 2009 - MAY 13, 2009 SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRLAND SENATOR LIEBERMAN, Chairman SENATOR THUNE, Ranking Member SENATOR BAYH SENATOR INHOFE SENATOR WEBB SENATOR SESSIONS SENATOR MCCASKILL SENATOR CHAMBLISS SENATOR HAGAN SENATOR BURR SENATOR BEGICH SENATOR BURRIS SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES SENATOR REED, Chairman SENATOR WICKER, Ranking Member SENATOR KENNEDY SENATOR GRAHAM SENATOR BYRD SENATOR MARTINEZ SENATOR BILL NELSON SENATOR BURR SENATOR BEN NELSON SENATOR COLLINS SENATOR BAYH SENATOR UDALL SUBCOMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL SENATOR BEN NELSON, Chairman SENATOR GRAHAM, Ranking Member SENATOR KENNEDY SENATOR CHAMBLISS SENATOR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Boundaries II
    Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II Pakistan - Afghanistan Track 1.5 and II cc Connecting People Building Peace Promoting Cooperation 1 Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II Pakistan – Afghanistan Track 1.5 and II Connecting People Building Peace Promoting Cooperation 2 Beyond Boundaries II Beyond Boundaries II ©Center for Research and Security Studies 2018 All rights reserved This publication can be ordered from CRSS Islamabad office. All CRSS publications are also available free of cost for digital download from the CRSS website. 14-M, Ali Plaza, 2nd Floor, F-8 Markaz, Islamabad, Pakistan. Tel: +92-51-8314801-03 Fax: +92-51-8314804 www.crss.pk 3 Beyond Boundaries II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................... 5 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 9 3. CONTEXTUALIZING BEYOND BOUNDARIES................................................... 11 4. FIRST MEETING OF THE PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ........ 56 5. SECOND MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE .......... 72 6. THIRD MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE .............. 95 7. FOURTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ........ 126 8. FIFTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS/TRADE ........................................................................................ 149 9. SIXTH MEETING OF PAKISTAN AFGHANISTAN JOINT COMMITTEE ............ 170 10. UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
    Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs February 10, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The limited capacity and widespread corruption of all levels of Afghan governance are growing factors in debate over the effectiveness of U.S. strategy in Afghanistan, as expressed in an Administration assessment of policy released December 16, 2010. A competent, respected, and effective Afghan government is considered a major prerequisite for a transition to Afghan leadership that is to take place by 2014, a timeframe agreed to by the United States, its international partners, and the Afghan government. Afghan governing capacity has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but many positions, particularly at the local level, are unfilled or governing functions are performed by unaccountable power brokers. On corruption, the issue that perhaps most divides the United States from the government of President Hamid Karzai, the Afghan leadership is accepting U.S. help to build emerging anti- corruption institutions, but these same institutions have sometimes caused a Karzai backlash when they have targeted his allies or relatives. Effects of corruption burst into public view in August 2010 when the large Kabul Bank nearly collapsed due in part to losses on large loans to major shareholders, many of whom are close to Karzai. Some in Congress have sought to link further U.S. aid to clearer progress on the corruption issue. Purportedly suspicious that U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Security Cooperation in The
    This publicaion has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publicaion are the sole responsibility of ATR Consuling and can in no way be taken to relect the views of the European Union. CONTENTs Execuive Summary 1 Acronyms 2 Acknowledgements 5 Background and 6 Context Concept and 7 Background of the Heart of Asia Building r Commitment 8 States to the Heart of Asia Process Among Membe Map 1: 9 Heart of Asia Member States Exising Studies 10 on the Heart of Asia Process Approach and 11 Methodology Approach 11 Research Quesions 11 Methodology 12 Findings 13 Security Cooperaion’ Looking Beyond the Tradiional Deiniion of ‘ 13 Security Threats 14 in the Region Security Cooperaion 17 Mechanisms in the Region Obstacles to 22 Efecive Security Cooperaion in the Region Opportuniies for 23 Intensiied Security Cooperaion Incenives for 25 Intensiied Security Cooperaion Policy Opions 26 for the Heart of Asia Conclusion 29 Appendix I: 31 Afghanistan Most Relevant 32 Security Threats to Afghanistan Exising Security 32 Cooperaion Mechanisms Obstacles to 35 Efecive Security Cooperaion Opportuniies aion and 38 Incenives for Intensiied Security Cooper Promising Policy 40 Opions for the Heart of Asia Process Map 2: 40 Proposed Route of TAPI Gas Pipeline Project Appendix II: 42 Azerbaijan Most Relevant 43 Security Threats Exising Security 44 Cooperaion Mechanisms Obstacles to Efecive Security Cooperaion 45 Opportuniies and Incenives for Intensiied Security Cooperaion 46 Promising Policy Opions for the Heart of Asia Process
    [Show full text]
  • Report 5Th EP-Afghanistan IPM, 17-19
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Delegation for relations with Afghanistan 15.1.2019 MISSION REPORT following the 5th EU-Afghanistan Inter-Parliamentary Meeting 17-19 December 2018, Kabul Delegation for relations with Afghanistan Members of the mission: Petras Auštrevičius (ALDE) (Leader of the mission) André Elissen (ENF) Frank Engel (PPE) CR\1175047EN.docx PE629.305v01-00 EN United in diversity EN Introduction The Delegation for relations with Afghanistan conducted a mission to Kabul from Monday 17 to Wednesday 19 December 2018. This was the Delegation to Afghanistan's second visit in the current parliamentary mandate after the 4th EU/Afghanistan IPM which took place in Kabul in February 2017. The aim of the mission was to hold the 5th Inter-parliamentary Meeting (IPM) with Members of Parliament from the Wolesi Jirga and to gain first-hand information about the evolving situation in the country and the status of the EU's political, military and development cooperation in Afghanistan. As in 2017, due to strict security provisions, the program of the visit was limited to Kabul, with a reduced delegation size – it was made up of only two members with the addition of the rapporteur on Afghanistan from the Committee for Development, plus, as a member of the secretariat, the Head of Unit of Asia. The Delegation adopted an IPM joint-statement with Afghan MPs and issued a press-statement to sum up the aim and main outcomes of the visit. Meetings In just three working days and in spite of high security concerns, the delegation managed to have an intense and high-level programme for four days, with several meetings, mostly inside the EU compound, through the highly appreciated and committed cooperation of the EU ambassador and his deputy and the EU head of the Political Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanisches Kabinett Komplett Parlamentsabstimmung Bestätigt Alle 25 Minister
    Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Hauptabteilung INT Team Asien e.V. Politischer Bericht / Kurzbericht Thema: Afghanisches Kabinett komplett Parlamentsabstimmung bestätigt alle 25 Minister Autor: Dr. Babak Khalatbari Ort/Datum: Kabul, 25.09.2006 Länder- / Regionalprogramm: AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISCHES KABINETT KOMPLETT Afghanisches Kabinett komplett Parlamentsabstimmung bestätigt alle 25 Minister INHALT 1. Abstimmungsverlauf 2. Lebensläufe der Minister 3. Kabinettsübersicht 4. Abstimmungsergebnisse 1 AFGHANISCHES KABINETT KOMPLETT Abstimmungsverlauf Das Kabinett von Präsident Karzai, das Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2006 und am Montag, aus insgesamt 25 den 7. August 2006 stellten sich die von Präsident Ministerien besteht, ist Karzai vorgeschlagenen Minister für die neue nun komplett. Regierung dem Parlament zur Vertrauens- abstimmung. Vorangegangen waren Anhörungen, in denen die Ziele, aber auch professionelle Erfahrung derzeit im Gespräch. Am 23.04.2006 wurde und die Nationalität der Kandidaten thematisiert unserem Büro von einem Parlamentarier mitgeteilt, worden waren. Die Presse in Afghanistan dass im Parlament zwischenzeitlich eine nicht kommentierte den Ausgang der Vertrauens- öffentliche Verfahrensabstimmung (87 Ja- abstimmung im April als Überraschung, da von den Stimmen/53 Nein-Stimmen) die Bestätigung der 25 von Präsident Karzai vorgeschlagenen drei in Frage gestellten Kandidaten ergeben habe. Kandidaten 20 angenommen und fünf abgelehnt Der Kandidat für das Amt des Kulturministers, Dr. wurden. Es mussten demnach fünf Kandidaten Sayed Makhdum
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Analysis / 285
    Weekly Analysis / 285 www.csrskabul.com Center for Strategic & Regional Studies Kabul Weekly Analysis-Issue Number 285 (Jan 19-26, 2019) Weekly Analysis is one of CSRS’ publications, which significantly analyses weekly economic and political events in Afghanistan and the region. The prime motive behind this is to provide strategic insights and policy solutions to decision-making institutions and individuals in order to help them to design best policies. Weekly Analysis is published in local languages (Pashto and Dari) and international languages (English and Arabic). ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ In this issue: Candidates and the fate of Afghan presidential elections Elections Late Experiences ......................................................................... 3 Current Election Teams .............................................................................. 4 Strong Candidates teams ........................................................................... 5 1-Mohammad Ashraf Ghani and his team ................................... 5 2-Dr. Abdullah Abdullah and His Team ......................................... 6 3-Mohammad Hanif Atmar and his team...................................... 7 4-Gulbadin Hekmatyar and his team ............................................ 8 The Electoral System and the Election Commission ................................... 8 The Future of Elections .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance
    Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs November 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance Summary The limited capacity and widespread corruption of all levels of Afghan governance are factors in debate over the effectiveness of U.S. policy in Afghanistan and in implementing a transition to Afghan security leadership by the end of 2014. The capacity of the formal Afghan governing structure has increased significantly since the Taliban regime fell in late 2001, but many positions, particularly at the local level, are unfilled. Widespread illiteracy limits expansion of a competent bureaucracy. A dispute over the results of the 2010 parliamentary elections paralyzed governance for nearly a year and was resolved in September 2011 with the unseating on the grounds of fraud of nine winners of the elected lower house of parliament. Karzai also has tried, through direct denials, to quell assertions by his critics that he wants to stay in office beyond the 2014 expiration of his second term, the limits under the constitution. While trying, with mixed success, to build the formal governing structure, Afghan President Hamid Karzai also works through an informal power structure centered around his close ethnic Pashtun allies as well as other ethnic and political faction leaders. Some faction leaders oppose Karzai on the grounds that he is too willing to make concessions to insurgent leaders in search of a settlement—a criticism that grew following the September 20 assassination of the most senior Tajik leader, former President Burhanuddin Rabbani.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan's Drug Career
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Citha D. Maass Afghanistan’s Drug Career Evolution from a War Economy to a Drug Economy RP 4 March 2011 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) and Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN), 2011 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the directing staff of the Institute. They express exclusively the per- sonal views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by David Barnes in cooperation with Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN) www.aan-afghanistan.org (English version of SWP-Studie 2/2010) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 The drug economy: A result of the new post-war order 10 Genesis and consolidation of the drug economy (1979–2001) 10 The expansion of drug production: External factors and central actors 11 The war economy and the war entrepreneurs: Transformation and consolidation 17 The transformation into a drug economy (2002–2008) 17 The structure of drug production in 2008 17 Doubts regarding sustainable decline 19 The interdependence between instability, neo-Taleban, and drug production 21 A misleading measure of success 22 The intertwining of political interests 26 The intertwining of economic structures 31 Conclusion and recommendations 32 Abbreviations Dr. Citha D. Maass is a researcher at SWP’s Asia Division Problems and Recommendations Afghanistan’s Drug Career Evolution from a War Economy to a Drug Economy The commercial production of drugs in Afghanistan began with the anti-Soviet jihad launched by muja- hedeen groups in 1979 with the financial and logis- tical support of the CIA, the United States and other Western states.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy
    Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs December 30, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30588 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary Upon taking office, the Obama Administration faced a deteriorating security environment in Afghanistan, despite a steady increase in U.S. forces there in recent years. Signs of deterioration have included an expanded area in which militants are operating, increasing numbers of civilian and military deaths, Afghan and international disillusionment with corruption in the government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and the ease of infiltration of Taliban militants from safe havens in Pakistan. Building on assessments completed in the latter days of the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration conducted a “strategic review,” the results of which were announced on March 27, 2009. The outcome of the review leaned toward those in the Administration who believe that adding combat troops is less crucial than building governance. As part of that review, the President did announce an increase of 21,000 U.S. troops, which arrived by November 2009 and brought U.S. force levels to about 68,000, in partnership with about 39,000 international forces from 42 other nations, and about 190,000 Afghan security forces. The Administration also decided that more innovative military tactics were needed to promote those goals, and in May 2009, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, was replaced by Gen. Stanley McChrystal. On August 30, 2009, McChrystal submitted his review of the military strategy, recommending a fully resourced, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy in order to avoid mission failure.
    [Show full text]
  • The a to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009
    The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009 AFGHANISTAN RESEARCH AND EVALUATION UNIT Improving Afghan Lives Through Research The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2009 Seventh Edition AFGHANISTAN RESEARCH AND EVALUATION UNIT Improving Afghan Lives Through Research IMPORTANT NOTE: The information presented in this Guide relies on the voluntary contributions of ministries and agencies of the Afghan government, embassies, development agencies and other organisations representing donor countries, national and international NGOs, and other institutions. While AREU undertakes with each edition of this Guide to provide the most accurate and current information possible, details evolve and change continuously. Users of this guide are encouraged to submit updates, additions, corrections and suggestions to [email protected]. © Copyright Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, January 2009. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing areu@ areu.org.af or by calling +93 799 608 548. Coordinating Editor: Cynthia Lee Contacts Section: Sheela Rabani and Noorullah Elham Contributors: Ahmadullah Amarkhil, Amanullah Atel, Chris Bassett, Mia Bonarski, Colin Deschamps, Noorullah Elham, Susan Fakhri, Paula Kantor, Anna Larson, Sheela Rabani, Rebecca Roberts, Syed Mohammad Shah,
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activities Committee on Armed Services United States Senate 111Th Congress
    1 112th CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session SENATE 112–2 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE 111TH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS 2009–2010 MARCH 14, 2011.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 99–010 WASHINGTON : 2011 VerDate Mar 15 2010 07:19 Mar 17, 2011 Jkt 099010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\SR002.XXX SR002 pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES (from January 21, 2009—December 22, 2010) CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona JACK REED, Rhode Island JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama BILL NELSON, Florida SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina EVAN BAYH, Indiana JOHN THUNE, South Dakota JIM WEBB, Virginia ROGER E. WICKER, Mississippi CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri GEORGE S. LEMIEUX, Florida MARK UDALL, Colorado SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina RICHARD BURR, North Carolina MARK BEGICH, Alaska DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia MARK KIRK, Illinois CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware RICHARD D. DEBOBES, Staff Director JOSEPH W. BOWAB, Republican Staff Director NOTES: Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until his death on August 25, 2009. Senator Mel Martinez of Florida served on the Committee during the 111th Congress from January 21, 2009 until the date of his resignation from the Senate on September 8, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfulfilled Expectations Iran Basketball to Meet the U.S
    WWW.TEHRANTIMES.COM I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y 8 Pages Price 50,000 Rials 1.00 EURO 4.00 AED 43rd year No.14000 Wednesday JULY 28, 2021 Mordad 6, 1400 Dhul Hijjah 17, 1442 Iran Majlis speaker Iran basketball Mangrove forests: a arrives in Syria for to meet the U.S. in miracle of nature Congratulations on Eid al-Ghadir economic talks Page 3 super tough match Page 3 Page 7 WB sees Iranian economy continuing positive growth until 2024 TEHRAN - Iranian economy is projected the next two fiscal years (2022-2024), to grow by 2.1 percent in the current fiscal expanding by 2.2 and 2.3 percent, re- year (March 2021-March 2022) as the spectively. domestic markets are getting back on track “Despite an initial COVID-19 induced Unfulfilled and the negative impacts of the coronavirus shock to GDP, a strong rebound in mid2020 pandemic begin to wane, according to led to a modest economic expansion in the World Bank’s Macro Poverty Outlook 2020/2021. The COVID-19 output loss (MPO) report for spring 2021. since Feb 2020 was less pronounced [in According to the mentioned report, Iran] than in other countries,” the report Iran’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is stated. expectations going to continue its positive growth over Continued on page 4 UNESCO grants world heritage status to Uramanat of Iran TEHRAN – UNESCO added Iran’s Ura- area embraces dense and step-like rows of manat cultural landscape to its list of world houses in a way that the roof of each house heritage sites on Tuesday.
    [Show full text]