List of Satellite Missions (By Year and Sponsoring

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Satellite Missions (By Year and Sponsoring Launch Year EO Satellite Mission (and sponsoring agency) 2008 CARTOSAT-2A (ISRO) 1967 Diademe 1&2 (CNES) 2008 FY-3A (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 1975 STARLETTE (CNES) 2008 OSTM (Jason-2) (NASA / NOAA / CNES / EUMETSAT) 1976 LAGEOS-1 (NASA / ASI) 2008 RapidEye (DLR) 1992 LAGEOS-2 (ASI / NASA) 2008 HJ-1A (CRESDA / CAST) 1993 SCD-1 (INPE) 2008 HJ-1B (CRESDA / CAST) 1993 STELLA (CNES) 2008 THEOS (GISTDA) 1997 DMSP F-14 (NOAA / USAF) 2008 COSMO-SkyMed 3 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 1997 Meteosat-7 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2008 FY-2E (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 1997 TRMM (NASA / JAXA) 2009 GOSAT (JAXA / MOE (Japan) / NIES (Japan)) 1998 NOAA-15 (NOAA) 2009 NOAA-19 (NOAA) 1998 SCD-2 (INPE) 2009 RISAT-2 (ISRO) 1999 Landsat 7 (USGS / NASA) 2009 GOES-14 (NOAA) 1999 QuikSCAT (NASA) 2009 UK-DMC2 (UKSA) 1999 Ikonos-2 2009 Deimos-1 1999 Ørsted (Oersted) (DNSC / CNES) 2009 Meteor-M N1 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 1999 DMSP F-15 (NOAA / USAF) 2009 OCEANSAT-2 (ISRO) 1999 Terra (NASA / METI / CSA) 2009 DMSP F-18 (NOAA / USAF) 1999 ACRIMSAT (NASA) 2009 SMOS (ESA / CDTI / CNES) 2000 NMP EO-1 (NASA) 2010 GOES-15 (NOAA) 2001 Odin (SNSB / TEKES / CNES / CSA) 2010 CryoSat-2 (ESA) 2001 QuickBird-2 2010 TanDEM-X (DLR) 2001 PROBA (ESA) 2010 COMS (KARI) 2002 GRACE (NASA / DLR) 2010 AISSat-1 (NSC) 2002 Aqua (NASA / JAXA / INPE) 2010 CARTOSAT-2B (ISRO) 2002 SPOT-5 (CNES) 2010 FY-3B (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2002 Meteosat-8 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2010 COSMO-SkyMed 4 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2002 KALPANA-1 (ISRO) 2011 Elektro-L N1 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2003 CORIOLIS (DoD (USA)) 2011 RESOURCESAT-2 (ISRO) 2003 SORCE (NASA) 2011 SAC-D/Aquarius (CONAE / NASA) 2003 INSAT-3A (ISRO) 2011 HY-2A (NSOAS / CAST) 2003 SCISAT-1 (CSA) 2011 NigeriaSat-X (NASRDA) 2003 DMSP F-16 (NOAA / USAF) 2011 RASAT (TUBITAK) 2004 FORMOSAT-2 (NSPO) 2011 NigeriaSat-2 (NASRDA) 2004 Aura (NASA / NSO / FMI / UKSA) 2011 Sich-2 (NSAU) 2005 MTSAT-1R (JMA / JCAB) 2011 MEGHA-TROPIQUES (CNES / ISRO) 2005 CARTOSAT-1 (ISRO) 2011 Suomi NPP (NASA / NOAA) 2005 NOAA-18 (NOAA) 2011 ZY-02C (CRESDA) 2005 Meteosat-9 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2011 Pleiades 1A (CNES) 2006 MTSAT-2 (JMA / JCAB) 2012 ZY-3 (CRESDA) 2006 COSMIC-1/FORMOSAT-3 FM1 (NSPO / NOAA / UCAR) 2012 FY-2F (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2006 COSMIC-2/FORMOSAT-3 FM2 (NSPO / NOAA / UCAR) 2012 LARES (ASI) 2006 COSMIC-4/FORMOSAT-3 FM4 (NSPO / NOAA / UCAR) 2012 SARAL (CNES / ISRO) 2006 COSMIC-5/FORMOSAT-3 FM5 (NSPO / NOAA / UCAR) 2012 RISAT-1 (ISRO) 2006 COSMIC-6/FORMOSAT-3 FM6 (NSPO / NOAA / UCAR) 2012 GCOM-W (JAXA) 2006 CALIPSO (NASA / CNES) 2012 KOMPSAT-3 (KARI) 2006 CloudSat (NASA / DoD (USA) / CSA) 2012 Meteosat-10 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2006 GOES-13 (NOAA) 2012 Kanopus-V (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2006 Resurs DK 1 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2012 Metop-B (EUMETSAT / NOAA / CNES / ESA) 2006 KOMPSAT-2 (KARI) 2012 SJ-9A (CRESDA / CAST) 2006 Metop-A (EUMETSAT / NOAA / CNES / ESA) 2012 SJ-9B (CRESDA / CAST) 2006 DMSP F-17 (NOAA / USAF) 2012 HJ-1C (CRESDA / CAST) 2006 FY-2D (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2012 Pleiades 1B (CNES) 2007 CARTOSAT-2 (ISRO) 2013 Landsat 8 (USGS / NASA) 2007 COSMO-SkyMed 1 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2013 PROBA-V (ESA / BELSPO) 2007 TerraSAR-X (DLR) 2013 VNREDSat 1 (VAST) 2007 COSMO-SkyMed 2 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2013 Resurs-P N1 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2007 RADARSAT-2 (CSA) 2013 INSAT-3D (ISRO) 2013 KOMPSAT-5 (KARI) 2016 Meteor-M N3 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2013 FY-3C (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2016 Obzor-O N1 (ROSKOSMOS) 2013 ePOP on CASSIOPE (CSA) 2016 COSMIC-2 (NOAA / NSPO / UCAR) 2013 TCTE (NOAA / NASA) 2016 GCOM-C (JAXA) 2013 Swarm (ESA / CNES / CSA) 2017 SIDAR (NOAA / NASA) 2014 GPM Core (NASA / JAXA) 2017 JPSS-1 (NOAA / EUMETSAT / NASA) 2014 Sentinel-1 A (ESA / EC) 2017 HY-3B (NSOAS / CAST) 2014 DMSP F-19 (NOAA / USAF) 2017 PRISMA (ASI) 2014 ALOS-2 (JAXA) 2017 GOES-S (NOAA / NASA) 2014 OCO-2 (NASA) 2017 CSG-2 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2014 AISSat-2 (NSC) 2017 OPSIS (ASI) 2014 Meteor-M N2 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2017 VNREDSat 1b (VAST) 2014 CBERS-4 (INPE / CRESDA) 2017 GRACE FO (NASA) 2014 Elektro-L N2 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2017 LOTUSat 1 (VAST) 2014 KOMPSAT-3A (KARI) 2017 ICESat-II (NASA) 2014 FY-2G (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2017 EarthCARE (ESA / JAXA) 2014 Resurs-P N2 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2017 AMAZONIA-1 (INPE) 2015 DSCOVR (NOAA / USAF / NASA) 2017 GISAT (ISRO) 2015 SMAP (NASA / CSA) 2017 Meteor-MP N1 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2015 PAZ (CDTI) 2017 Obzor-O N2 (ROSKOSMOS) 2015 Jason-3 (NASA / NOAA / CNES / EUMETSAT) 2017 FY-4B (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2015 Sentinel-2 A (ESA / EC) 2017 FY-3E (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2015 Sentinel-3 A (ESA / EUMETSAT / EC) 2018 EnMAP (DLR) 2015 INSAT-3DR (ISRO) 2018 GOSAT-2 (JAXA / MOE (Japan) / NIES (Japan)) 2015 AISSat-3 (NSC) 2018 Metop-C (EUMETSAT / NOAA / CNES / ESA) 2015 Arctic-M N1 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2018 GEO-KOMPSAT-2A (KARI) 2015 Meteosat-11 (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2018 RADARSAT C-1 (CSA / NRCAN / DND / DFO / AAFC / EnvCan / PSC) 2015 SAOCOM 1A (CONAE / ASI) 2018 RADARSAT C-2 (CSA / NRCAN / DND / DFO / AAFC / EnvCan / PSC) 2015 Sentinel-3 B (ESA / EUMETSAT / EC) 2018 RADARSAT C-3 (CSA / NRCAN / DND / DFO / AAFC / EnvCan / PSC) 2015 SCATSAT-1 (ISRO) 2018 CARTOSAT-3 (ISRO) 2015 ADM-Aeolus (ESA) 2018 OCEANSAT-3 (ISRO) 2015 Sentinel-1 B (ESA / EC) 2018 TEMPO (NASA) 2015 Sentinel-5 precursor (ESA / NSO) 2018 GEO-KOMPSAT-2B (KARI) 2015 FY-4A (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2018 SAC-E/SABIA_MAR-A (CONAE) 2015 FY-3D (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2018 Meteor-MP N2 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2015 Resurs-P N3 (ROSKOSMOS) 2018 TSX-NG (DLR) 2015 Meteor-M N2-1 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2018 Elektro-L N3 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2015 Meteor-M N2-2 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2018 CFOSAT (CNES) 2015 HY-2C (NSOAS / CAST) 2018 Obzor-O N3 (ROSKOSMOS) 2015 FY-2H (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2018 Obzor-R N1 (ROSKOSMOS) 2015 HY-3A (NSOAS / CAST) 2018 Arctic-M N2 (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2015 Kanopus-V-IR (ROSKOSMOS / ROSHYDROMET) 2019 SAOCOM-2A (CONAE) 2016 Himawari-9 (JMA) 2019 MTG-I1 (imaging) (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2016 RESOURCESAT-2A (ISRO) 2019 Sentinel-1 C (ESA / EC) 2016 Ingenio (CDTI / ESA) 2019 GOES-T (NOAA / NASA) 2016 SAGE-III (NASA) 2019 KOMPSAT-6 (KARI) 2016 Sentinel-2 B (ESA / EC) 2019 RISAT-1A (ISRO) 2016 GOES-R (NOAA / NASA) 2019 MERLIN (CNES / DLR) 2016 HY-2B (NSOAS / CAST) 2019 SAC-E/SABIA_MAR-B (CONAE) 2016 GCOM-W2 (JAXA) 2019 HY-2D (NSOAS / CAST) 2016 CSG-1 (ASI / MoD (Italy)) 2019 Meteor-MP N3 (ROSHYDROMET / ROSKOSMOS) 2016 CARTOSAT-2E (ISRO) 2019 Obzor-O N4 (ROSKOSMOS) 2016 Norsat-1 (NSC) 2019 Obzor-R N2 (ROSKOSMOS) 2016 SARE-1B (CONAE) 2019 GCOM-C2 (JAXA) 2016 SAOCOM 1B (CONAE / ASI) 2019 FY-3F (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2016 CYGNSS (NASA / NOAA) 2020 DMSP F-20 (NOAA / USAF) 2016 OCO-3 (NASA) 2020 Sentinel-2 C (ESA / EC) 2016 VENUS (CNES / ISA) 2020 Sentinel-3 C (ESA / EUMETSAT / EC) 2020 SAOCOM-2B (CONAE) 2020 BIOMASS (ESA) 2020 HyspIRI (NASA) 2020 GCOM-W3 (JAXA) 2020 Sentinel-6 A (ESA / EUMETSAT / NASA / NOAA / EC / CNES) 2020 LOTUSat 2 (VAST) 2020 SWOT (NASA / UKSA / CNES / CSA) 2020 PACE (NASA) 2020 NISAR (NASA / ISRO) 2020 Obzor-R N3 (ROSKOSMOS) 2020 FY-4C (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2021 EPS-SG-a (EUMETSAT / DLR / EC / CNES / ESA) 2021 Sentinel-5 (ESA) 2021 Sentinel-4 A (ESA / EC) 2021 MTG-S1 (sounding) (EUMETSAT / EC / ESA) 2021 PCW-1 (CSA / DND / EnvCan) 2021 JPSS-2 (NOAA / EUMETSAT / NASA) 2021 RESOURCESAT-3 (ISRO) 2021 PCW-2 (CSA / DND / EnvCan) 2021 FY-3G (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2022 HRWS SAR (DLR) 2022 ACE (NASA) 2022 HY-3C (NSOAS / CAST) 2022 ASCENDS (NASA) 2022 EPS-SG-b (EUMETSAT / CNES / ESA) 2022 Obzor-R N4 (ROSKOSMOS) 2023 GEO-CAPE (NASA) 2023 MTG-I2 (imaging) (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2023 GCOM-C3 (JAXA) 2023 FY-4D (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2024 GOES-U (NOAA / NASA) 2025 Sentinel-6 B (ESA / EUMETSAT / NASA / NOAA / EC / CNES) 2026 MTG-I3 (imaging) (EUMETSAT / ESA) 2026 FY-4E (NSMC-CMA / NRSCC) 2029 Sentinel-4 B (ESA / EC) 2029 MTG-S2 (sounding) (EUMETSAT / EC / ESA) 2030 LIST (NASA) 2030 PATH (NASA) 2030 GRACE-II (NASA) 2030 SCLP (NASA) 2030 GACM (NASA) 2030 3D Winds (NASA) 2031 MTG-I4 (imaging) (EUMETSAT / ESA).
Recommended publications
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2013 February 2014 About FAA \ NOTICE ###i# £\£\ ###ii# Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 YEAR AT A GLANCE ..............................................2 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION 2013 YEAR IN REVIEW ........5 7 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES .....................................21 3 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES ...............................47 33 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES AND PLATFORMS ............................57 LAUNCH SITES .................................................65 COMMERCIAL VENTURES BEYOND EARTH ORBIT ...................79 44 REGULATION AND POLICY .......................................83 3 5 3 53 3 8599: : : ;55: 9 < 5; < 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS ..........89 4 3 4 : ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................186 2013 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH EVENTS .....................192 DEFINITIONS ..................................................196 ###iii# £\£\ LIST OF FIGURES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW = =999 =99 = =3> =:9;> LAUNCH SITES = :< 2013 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECASTS =944 =4 =?4;9 =99493 =3 =:5= =< =;=9 =95;@3 =A =;=9 A 3 =994?: =9999 ? =54 =359 =:5 3 =<999= ? =99=5 ?3 =;>>99: =99 ? 3 ==9 ? 3: =3 =>3 =?: =3?: =:? : ###iv# LIST OF TABLES COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION YEAR IN REVIEW 99 : 3< :9=99< <99 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLES 99 99 59595 593 SUBORBITAL REUSABLE VEHICLES 3 :5933 ON-ORBIT VEHICLES
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Bearings in the Development of Mathematics
    This dissertation has been 65—3869 microfilmed exactly as received HUMBERD, Jesse David, 1921- RELIGIOUS BEARINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICS. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1964 Education, history University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Copyright by Jesse David Humberd 1965 RELIGIOUS BEARINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OP MATHEMATICS DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Jesse David Humberd, B.S., B.A., M*A., B.D, - 5 ;- - i s - # - j t The Ohio State University 1964 Approved by A d v ise r Department of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere thanks and appreciation to Dr, Harold P, Fawcett, teacher and adviser, for his inspiring personality in the classroom, and for his enthusiastic support in the preparation of this study. The author was first challenged by Dr, Fawcett in 1947, when in his first graduate course, Education 687, he was challenged to read more than twenty basic works in mathematics education. From that day to the present, he has known and valued greatly the ready enthusiasm and wise counsel of this master teacher. It is with deep gratitude that the author recognizes the cooperation and encouragement of his wife, Laura, during the preparation of this study. Much of the inconvenience resulting from moving the family several times, for graduate work; and most of the extra effort at home caused by periods of the w riter’s absence, has been borne by her. And to Lenora and Margaret, (or as they would have it, Lee and Meg), the author expresses thanks for their loyalty, during what must have seemed to be most of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris Program Office Figure 1
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 13, Issue 1 January 2009 Inside... New Debris Seen from Decommissioned Fengyun-1C Debris: Two Years Later 2 Satellite with Nuclear Power Source The ESA’s ATV-1 Reentry Event 3 A 21-year-old satellite containing a dormant According to Russian reports, the nuclear reactors nuclear reactor was the source of an unexpected on Cosmos 1818 and Cosmos 1867 functioned for Two New Microsatellite debris cloud in early July 2008. Launched by the approximately 5 and 11 months, respectively. For Impact Tests 4 former Soviet Union in February 1987, Cosmos the next two decades, the two inactive spacecraft 1818 (International Designator 1987-011A, circled the Earth without significant incident. Review of Different U.S. Satellite Number 17369) was the first of two Following the fragmentation event on or about Solar Cycle 24 vehicles designed to test a new, more advanced 4 July 2008, the U.S. Space Surveillance Network Predictions 7 nuclear power supply in low Earth orbit. Dozens was able to produce orbital data on 30 small debris of small particles were released during the still- (Figure 2). The majority of these debris were ejected Don Kessler Wins unexplained debris generation event. in a posigrade direction with velocities of less Space Safety Pioneer Cosmos 1818 and its sister spacecraft, than 15 meters per second, suggesting a relatively Award 8 Cosmos 1867 (Figure 1), carried a thermionic low energy event. From radar detections, a larger nuclear power supply, in contrast to the simpler, number of very small debris appear to have also Abstracts from the thermoelectric nuclear device which provided been released, but routine tracking of these debris NASA OD Program energy to the well-known RORSATs (Radar Ocean has proven difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • GEO and GEOSS……
    GEO - GEOSS Support of the CBD 2010 Targets CBD - SBSTTA Paris, 4 July 2007 Douglas Muchoney, GEO Secretariat © GEO Secretariat The Earth is a complex system of systems © GEO Secretariat Any Single Problem Requires Many Data Sets A Single Data Set Will Serve Many Communities © GEO Secretariat Solar Energy © GEO Secretariat GEOSS Implementation is a Non- binding, Voluntary Process • Relies on the Goodwill of Members and Participating Organizations • Efficient for Contribution of Components • Not a Funding Mechanism • GEO implements GEOSS © GEO Secretariat GEO Goal Improve and Coordinate Observation Systems Provide Easier & More Open Data Access Foster Use (Science, Applications, Capacity Bldg) … to answer Society’s need for informed decision making © GEO Secretariat GEOSS: A Global, Coordinated, Comprehensive and Sustained System of Observing Systems © GEO Secretariat GEOSS will Address Nine Societal Benefit Areas 1. Reduction and Prevention of Disasters 2. Human Health and Epidemiology 3. Energy Management 4. Climate Variability & Change 5. Water Management 6. Weather Forecasting 7. Ecosystems 8. Agriculture 9. Biodiversity © GEO Secretariat GEOSS achievement through 5 Transverse Areas 1. Architecture 2. Data Management 3. User Engagement 4. Capacity Building 5. Outreach © GEO Secretariat Envisat SORCE Aura/Aqua/Terra Sage QuikScat IKONOS CBERS SeaWiFS SPOT 4, 5 SPIN-2 SeaWinds Orbview 2, 3 TRMM DMC ACRIMSAT EROS A1 ERBS Radarsat ALOS Toms-EP QuickBird Grace Landsat 7 Jason UARS Space Observation© GEO Secretariat Systems In Situ Observation Systems © GEO Secretariat GEO Societal Benefit Areas 1. Reduction and Prevention of Disasters 2. Human Health 3. Energy Management 4. Climate Change 5. Water Management 6. Weather Forecasting 7. Ecosystems 8. Agriculture 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment
    1 Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment: Progress, Past 2 Challenges and Future Opportunities 3 4 Harry West, Nevil Quinn & Michael Horswell 5 Centre for Water, Communities & Resilience; Department of Geography & Environmental 6 Management; University of the West of EnglanD, Bristol 7 8 CorresponDing Author: Harry West ([email protected]) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment: Progress, Past 25 Challenges and Future Opportunities 26 27 Abstract 28 Drought is a common hydrometeorological phenomenon anD a pervasive global hazarD. As 29 our climate changes, it is likely that Drought events will become more intense anD frequent. 30 Effective Drought monitoring is therefore critical, both to the research community in 31 Developing an unDerstanDing of Drought, anD to those responsible for Drought management 32 anD mitigation. Over the past 50 years remote sensing has shifteD the fielD away from 33 reliance on traditional site-baseD measurements anD enableD observations anD estimates of 34 key drought-relateD variables over larger spatial anD temporal scales than was previously 35 possible. This has proven especially important in Data poor regions with limiteD in-situ 36 monitoring stations. Available remotely senseD Data proDucts now represent almost all 37 aspects of Drought propagation anD have contributeD to our unDerstanDing of the 38 phenomena. In this review we chart the rise of remote sensing for Drought monitoring, 39 examining key milestones anD technologies for assessing meteorological, agricultural anD 40 hyDrological Drought events. We reflect on challenges the research community has faceD to 41 Date, such as limitations associateD with Data recorD length anD spatial, temporal anD 42 spectral resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Here Your Title
    Envisat SORCE Aura/Aqua/Terra Sage QuikScat IKONOS CBERS SeaWiFS SPOT 4, 5 GEO-GLAM SPIN-2 SeaWinds GLOBAL AGRICULTURALOrbview 2, 3 MONITORINGTRMM DMC ACRIMSAT EROS A1 ERBS Radarsat Jai Singh PariharALOS for the GEOGLAM group and GEO Agriculture CommunityToms-EP of Practice QuickBird Grace Landsat 7 Jason UARS © GEO Secretariat Cereal grain production per hectare (Source: SAGE, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc., USA) 5th GEOSS-Asia Pacific Symposium, Tokyo, April 2-4, 2012 1. The GEO-GLAM Initiative : Objectives To reinforce the international community’s capacity to produce and disseminate relevant, timely and accurate forecasts of agricultural production at national, regional and global scales. Envisat SORCE Aura/Aqua/Terra Sage QuikScat IKONOS CBERS SeaWiFS SPOT 4, 5 SPIN-2 SeaWinds Orbview 2, 3 TRMM DMC ACRIMSAT EROS A1 ERBS Radarsat ALOS Toms-EP QuickBird Grace Landsat 7 Jason UARS © GEO Secretariat Agronomy Earth Observation Agro-economy Cultivated area / crop type area Meteorology Cereal grain production per hectare (Source: SAGE, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc., USA) Crop yield forecast 2 1. The GEO-GLAM Initiative : Background (G20 2011) 3 1. The GEO-GLAM Initiative : Background (G20 2011) G20 Final Declaration (Nov. 2011) 44. We commit to improve market information and transparency in order to make international markets for agricultural commodities more effective. To that end, we launched: • The "Agricultural Market Information System" (AMIS) in Rome on September 15, 2011, to improve information on markets ...; • The "Global Agricultural Geo-monitoring Initiative" (GEOGLAM) in Geneva on September 22-23, 2011, to coordinate satellite monitoring observation systems … to enhance crop production projections ... 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Optics and Assemblies
    PRECISION OPTICS AND ASSEMBLIES Image: NASA Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) High-performance, reliable optics for ground and space-based observation Dazzling details of Earth and insights into the mysteries of the universe BENEFITS have one thing in common — L3Harris precision optics. High-perfor- > Meet the most demanding mance optical components and assemblies have been integral to the requirements for spatial world’s most sophisticated ground- and space-based telescopes and frequency, mounting and satellites for more than 50 years. application-specific needs > Provide end-to-end capabilities with cost-effective fabrication SPECIALIZING IN CUSTOM, L3Harris provides solutions for high- LARGE-SCALE OPTICS performance systems, including: > Create surface finish to less than two-nanometer root mean > Ground- and space-based telescopes L3Harris provides optomechanical design, square (RMS) on glass and glass optical fabrication, test and assembly > Solid and lightweight optics for ceramic materials capabilities for precision optics solutions autocollimating systems and systems. The company manufactures > Lightweight fast-steering mirrors large optical components, including lightweight and solid mirrors in most > High-energy laser optics geometric shapes, to meet low surface > Optical test systems microroughness and tight surface figure error specifications. This experience, > Relay mirrors along with a rigorous metrology and > Observation and vacuum testing program and state-of-the-art compatible viewing windows in-house facilities,
    [Show full text]
  • Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users
    Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users By Holly M. Miller, Leslie Richardson, Stephen R. Koontz, John Loomis, and Lynne Koontz Open-File Report 2013–1269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey i U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2013 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Miller, H.M., Richardson, Leslie, Koontz, S.R., Loomis, John, and Koontz, Lynne, 2013, Users, uses, and value of Landsat satellite imagery—Results from the 2012 survey of users: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1269, 51 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131269. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms and Initialisms ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Aspects of Orbit Determination with GPS for Small Satellites with SAR Payloads Sergio De Florio, Tino Zehetbauer, Dr
    Deutsches Zentrum Microwave and Radar Institute für Luft und Raumfahrt e.V. Department Reconnaissance and Security Operational Aspects of Orbit Determination with GPS for Small Satellites with SAR Payloads Sergio De Florio, Tino Zehetbauer, Dr. Thomas Neff Phone: +498153282357, [email protected] Abstract Requirements Scientific small satellite missions for remote sensing with Synthetic Taylor expansion of the phase Φ of the radar signal as a Aperture Radar (SAR) payloads or high accuracy optical sensors, pose very function of time varying position, velocity and acceleration: strict requirements on the accuracy of the reconstructed satellite positions, velocities and accelerations. Today usual GPS receivers can fulfill the 4π 233 Φ==++++()t Rtap ()()01kk apttaptt ()(-) 02030 ()(-) k aptt ()(-) k ο () t accuracy requirements of this missions in most cases, but for low-cost- λ missions the decision for a appropriate satellite hardware has to take into Typical requirements, for 0.5 to 1.0 m image resolution, on account not only the reachable quality of data but also the costs. An spacecraft position vector x: analysis is carried out in order to assess which on board and ground equipment, which type of GPS data and processing methods are most −−242 appropriate to minimize mission costs and full satisfying mission payload x≤≤⋅≤⋅ 15 mmsms x 1.5 10 / x 6.0 10 / (3σ ) requirements focusing the attention on a SAR payload. These are requirements on the measurements, not on the real motion of the satellite Required Hardware Typical Position
    [Show full text]
  • Platforms & Sensors
    PLATFORMS & SENSORS Platform: the vehicle carrying the remote sensing device Sensor: the remote sensing device recording wavelengths of energy e.g. Aerial photography - the plane and the camera Satellite image example: Platform: Landsat (1, 5, 7 etc..) Sensor: Multispectral Sensor (MSS) or Thematic Mapper (TM) Selected satellite remote sensing systems NASA Visible Earth: long list Wim Bakker's website http://members.home.nl/wim.h.bakker http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=52174 1. Satellite orbits “Sun-synchronous” “Geostationary” Land monitoring Weather satellites ~ 700 km altitude ~ 30,000 km altitude Satellite orbits Geostationary / geosynchronous : 36,000 km above the equator, stays vertically above the same spot, rotates with earth - weather images, e.g. GOES (Geostat. Operational Env. Satellite) Sun-synchronous satellites: 700-900 km altitude, rotates at circa 81-82 degree angle to equator: captures imagery approx the same time each day (10am +/- 30 minutes) - Landsat path: earthnow Sun-synchronous Graphic: http://ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca/resource/tutor/datarecept/c1p2_e.php 700-900 km altitude rotates at ~ 81-82 ° angle to the equator (near polar): captures imagery the same time each day (10.30am +/- 30 minutes) - for earth mapping Orbit every 90-100 minutes produces similar daytime lighting Geostationary satellites capture a (rectangular) scene, sun-synchronous satellites capture a continuous swath, … which is broken into rectangular scenes. 2. Scanner types Whiskbroom (mirror/ cross-track): a small number of sensitive diodes for each band sweep perpendicular to the path or swath, centred directly under the platform, i.e. at 'nadir' e.g. LANDSAT MSS /TM Pushbroom (along-track): an array of diodes (one for each column of pixels) is 'pointed' in a selected direction, nadir or off-nadir, on request, usually 0-30 degrees (max.), e.g.
    [Show full text]