DOCSLIB.ORG

Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users By Holly M. Miller, Leslie Richardson, Stephen R. Koontz, John Loomis, and Lynne Koontz Open-File Report 2013–1269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey i U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2013 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Miller, H.M., Richardson, Leslie, Koontz, S.R., Loomis, John, and Koontz, Lynne, 2013, Users, uses, and value of Landsat satellite imagery—Results from the 2012 survey of users: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1269, 51 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131269. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms and Initialisms ................................................................................................................................ v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... vi Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Sampling ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Survey ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Analyses ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Statistical Significance and Interpretation ................................................................................................... 3 Response Rate ........................................................................................................................................... 4 User Types ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Demographics ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Use of Landsat Imagery.............................................................................................................................. 7 Types of Imagery Used ........................................................................................................................... 7 Temporal and Geopolitical Characteristics of Projects Using Landsat Imagery ...................................... 8 Application Areas .................................................................................................................................. 11 Change in Use of Landsat Over Time ................................................................................................... 13 Discussion: Use of Landsat Imagery ..................................................................................................... 13 Impacts of No-Cost Data Policy ................................................................................................................ 14 Discussion: Impacts of No Cost Data Policy ......................................................................................... 17 Value of Landsat Imagery ......................................................................................................................... 19 Importance and Satisfaction.................................................................................................................. 19 Benefits of Landsat ............................................................................................................................... 21 Level of Use and Dependence on Landsat in Work .............................................................................. 22 If Landsat Imagery Was No Longer Available ....................................................................................... 23 Loss of Landsat 5 Imagery .................................................................................................................... 28 Economic Benefits from Landsat Imagery............................................................................................. 32 Discussion: Value of Landsat Imagery .................................................................................................. 40 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 40 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ 41 References ................................................................................................................................................... 42 Appendixes .................................................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 45 Appendix 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 46 ii Figures Figure 1. Respondents by Landsat imagery use and current Landsat users by citizenship (n = 13,473) ......... 5 Figure 2. Status of Landsat imagery use among current Landsat users (n = 11,227) ...................................... 6 Figure 3. Sectors of current Landsat users (n = 10,789) .................................................................................. 7 Figure 4. Acquisition years of scenes obtained by current Landsat users (n = 11,170) .................................... 9 Figure 5. Locations of projects using Landsat imagery in the year prior to the survey among current Landsat users (n = 11,183) ............................................................................................................. 10 Figure 6. Locations of projects using Landsat imagery among citizens of each geographic region who conducted projects within that region in the year prior to the survey (n = 11,183) ........................... 10 Figure 7. Geopolitical scales of projects using Landsat imagery in the year prior to the survey among current Landsat users (n = 11,184). ................................................................................................ 11 Figure 8. Primary applications of Landsat imagery in projects conducted in year prior to survey among current Landsat users (n = 11,190) ................................................................................................. 13 Figure 9. Predicted changes in use of Landsat imagery after the launch of the Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) among current Landsat users (n = 9,860) ............................................................. 14 Figure 10. Sources used by established Landsat users to obtain Landsat imagery before and after the imagery became available at no cost from the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (n = 4,494) ..................................................................... 15 Figure 11. Sources used by established U.S. and international Landsat users to obtain Landsat imagery before and after the imagery became available at no cost from the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (n = 4,494) ................................................... 16 Figure 12. Mean importance of and mean satisfaction with specific attributes of Landsat imagery among current Landsat users (n ≥ 10,225) ................................................................................................. 20 Figure 13. Benefits observed by current Landsat users from their projects that used Landsat imagery (n ≥ 10,196) .................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 14. Dependence on Landsat imagery among users with varying levels of use of Landsat imagery (n = 8,398) ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 15. Imagery preferences among current Landsat users who selected the same imagery both with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GPS Radio Occultation with CHAMP, GRACE-A, Terrasar-X, and COSMIC: Brief Review of Results from GFZ J
    GPS radio occultation with CHAMP, GRACE-A, TerraSAR-X, and COSMIC: Brief review of results from GFZ J. Wickert, G. Beyerle, C. Falck, S. Heise, R. König, G. Michalak, D. Pingel*, M. Rothacher, T. Schmidt, and C. Viehweg GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, * Deutscher Wetterdienst Overview Current GPS occultation missions During the last decade ground and space based GNSS techniques for atmospheric/ionospheric remote sensing were established. The currently increasing number of receiver platforms (e.g., extension of regional/global ground networks and additional LEO satellites) together with future additional transmitters (GALILEO, reactivated GLONASS, new signal structures for GPS) will extend the potential of these innovative sounding techniques during the next years. Here, we focus to GPS radio CHAMP GRACE TerraSAR-X occultation and present selected examples of recent GFZ results. The activities include orbit and atmospheric /ionospheric occultation data processing for several satellite mission (CHAMP,GRACE-A, SAC-C, and COSMIC), but also various applications. Data sets from CHAMP, GRACE and COSMIC MetOp COSMIC SAC-C Current GPS radio occultation missions: CHAMP (launch July 15, 2000), GRACE (March 17, 2002), TerraSAR-X (June 15, 2007), MetOp (October 18, 2006), COSMIC (April 15, 2006) and SAC-C(November 21, 2000). Number of daily available vertical atmospheric profiles, derived from CHAMP (left), GRACE (middle), and COSMIC (right, UCAR processing) measurements (note the different scale). COSMIC provides significantly more data compared to CHAMP and GRACE-A. The long-term set from CHAMP is unique (300 km orbit altitude expected in Dec. 2008). Validation of CHAMP with MOZAIC aircraft data Near-real time data from CHAMP and GRACE-A (a) (b) (c) GFZ provides near-real time occultation data (bending angle and refractivity profiles) from CHAMP and GRACE-A using it’s operational ground infrastructure including 2 receiving antennas at Ny Ålesund.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey and Assessment of the Capabilities of Cubesats for Earth Observation
    Acta Astronautica 74 (2012) 50–68 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Review A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation Daniel Selva a,n, David Krejci b a Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA b Vienna University of Technology, Vienna 1040, Austria article info abstract Article history: In less than a decade, Cubesats have evolved from purely educational tools to a standard Received 2 December 2011 platform for technology demonstration and scientific instrumentation. The use of COTS Accepted 9 December 2011 (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) components and the ongoing miniaturization of several technologies have already led to scattered instances of missions with promising Keywords: scientific value. Furthermore, advantages in terms of development cost and develop- Cubesats ment time with respect to larger satellites, as well as the possibility of launching several Earth observation satellites dozens of Cubesats with a single rocket launch, have brought forth the potential for University satellites radically new mission architectures consisting of very large constellations or clusters of Systems engineering Cubesats. These architectures promise to combine the temporal resolution of GEO Remote sensing missions with the spatial resolution of LEO missions, thus breaking a traditional trade- Nanosatellites Picosatellites off in Earth observation mission design. This paper assesses the current capabilities of Cubesats with respect to potential employment in Earth observation missions. A thorough review of Cubesat bus technology capabilities is performed, identifying potential limitations and their implications on 17 different Earth observation payload technologies. These results are matched to an exhaustive review of scientific require- ments in the field of Earth observation, assessing the possibilities of Cubesats to cope with the requirements set for each one of 21 measurement categories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Satellite Data in the Joint Center for Satellite
    The Impact of Satellite Data in the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation John Le Marshall (JCSDA) Director, JCSDA 2004-2007 Lars-Peter Rishojgaard 2007- … Overview • Background • The Challenge • The JCSDA • The Satellite Program • Recent Advances • Impact of Satellite Data • Plans/Future Prospects • Summary CDAS/Reanl vs GFS NH/SH 500Hpa day 5 Anomaly Correlation (20-80 N/S) 90 NH GFS 85 SH GFS NH CDAS/Reanl 80 SH CDAS/Reanl 75 70 65 60 Anomaly Correlation Anomaly Correlation 55 50 45 40 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 YEAR Data Assimilation Impacts in the NCEP GDAS N. Hemisphere 500 mb AC Z 20N - 80N Waves 1-20 15 Jan - 15 Feb '03 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 control 0.5 no amsu 0.4 no conv 0.3 Anomaly Correlation 0.2 0.1 0 1234567891011121314151617 Forecast [days] AMSU and “All Conventional” data provide nearly the same amount of improvement to the Northern Hemisphere. Impact of Removing Selected Satellite Data on Hurricane Track Forecasts in the East Pacific Basin 140 120 100 Control No AMSU 80 No HIRS 60 No GEO Wind 40 No QSC 20 Average Track ErrorsAverage [NM] 0 12 24 36 48 Forecst Time [hours] Anomaly correlation for days 0 to 7 for 500 hPa geopotential height in the zonal band 20°-80° for January/February. The red arrow indicate use of satellite data in the forecast model has doubled the length of a useful forecast. The Challenge Satellite Systems/Global Measurements GRACE Aqua Cloudsat CALIPSO TRMM SSMIS GIFTS TOPEX NPP Landsat MSG Meteor/ SAGE GOES-R COSMIC/GPS NOAA/ POES NPOESS SeaWiFS Terra Jason Aura ICESat SORCE WindSAT 5-Order Magnitude
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Lynn Cline, United States Representative on Agenda
    Statement by Kevin Conole, United States Representative, on Agenda Item 7, “Matters Related to Remote Sensing of the Earth by Satellite, Including Applications for Developing Countries and Monitoring of the Earth’s Environment” -- February 12, 2020 Thank you, Madame Chair and distinguished delegates. The United States is committed to maintaining space as a stable and productive environment for the peaceful uses of all nations, including the uses of space-based observation and monitoring of the Earth’s environment. The U.S. civil space agencies partner to achieve this goal. NASA continues to operate numerous satellites focused on the science of Earth’s surface and interior, water and energy cycles, and climate. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (or NOAA) operates polar- orbiting, geostationary, and deep space terrestrial and space weather satellites. The U.S. Geological Survey (or USGS) operates the Landsat series of land-imaging satellites, extending the nearly forty-eight year global land record and serving a variety of public uses. This constellation of research and operational satellites provides the world with high-resolution, high-accuracy, and sustained Earth observation. Madame Chair, I will now briefly update the subcommittee on a few of our most recent accomplishments under this agenda item. After a very productive year of satellite launches in 2018, in 2019 NASA brought the following capabilities on- line for research and application users. The ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on the International Space Station (ISS) has been used to generate three high-level products: evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, and the evaporative stress index — all focusing on how plants use water.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Multi-Satellite Altimetry Data with CHAMP and GRACE Egms for Geoid and Sea Surface Topography Determination
    Combination of multi-satellite altimetry data with CHAMP and GRACE EGMs for geoid and sea surface topography determination G.S. Vergos , V.N. Grigoriadis, I.N. Tziavos Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Box 440, 541 24, Thessalo- niki, Greece, Fax: +30 231 0995948, E-mail: [email protected]. M.G. Sideris Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Abstract. Since the launch of the first altimetric mis- repeating measurements of the sea surface. Such satel- sions a wealth of data for the sea surface has become lites are ERS1, ERS2 and ENVISAT and available and utilized for geoid and sea surface topogra- TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) with JASON-1. JASON-1 and phy modeling. The data from the gravity field dedicated ENVISAT are the latest on orbit satellites (December satellite missions of CHAMP and GRACE provide a 2001 and March 2002, respectively) and are both set on unique opportunity for combination studies with satel- exact repeat missions (ERM). lite altimetric observations. This study focuses on the This long series of altimetric observations has been combination of data from GEOSAT, ERS1/2, widely used for studies on the determination of MSS Topex/Poseidon, JASON-1 and ENVISAT with Earth models (Andersen and Knudsen 1998; Cazenave et al. Gravity Models (EGMs) generated from CHAMP and 1996), global and regional geoid models (Andritsanos et GRACE data to study the mean sea surface al. 2001; Lemoine et al. 1998; Vergos et al. 2005) as (MSS)/marine geoid in the Mediterranean Sea. Various well as on the recovery of gravity anomalies from al- combination methods, i.e., weighted least squares and timetric measurements (Andersen and Knudsen 1998; least squares collocation are investigated and conclu- Hwang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earth Observer. July
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Earth Observer. July - August 2012. Volume 24, Issue 4. Editor’s Corner Steve Platnick obser ervth EOS Senior Project Scientist The joint NASA–U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Landsat program celebrated a major milestone on July 23 with the 40th anniversary of the launch of the Landsat-1 mission—then known as the Earth Resources and Technology Satellite (ERTS). Landsat-1 was the first in a series of seven Landsat satellites launched to date. At least one Landsat satellite has been in operation at all times over the past four decades providing an uninter- rupted record of images of Earth’s land surface. This has allowed researchers to observe patterns of land use from space and also document how the land surface is changing with time. Numerous operational applications of Landsat data have also been developed, leading to improved management of resources and informed land use policy decisions. (The image montage at the bottom of this page shows six examples of how Landsat data has been used over the last four decades.) To commemorate the anniversary, NASA and the USGS helped organize and participated in several events on July 23. A press briefing was held over the lunch hour at the Newseum in Washington, DC, where presenta- tions included the results of a My American Landscape contest. Earlier this year NASA and the USGS sent out a press release asking Americans to describe landscape change that had impacted their lives and local areas. Of the many responses received, six were chosen for discussion at the press briefing with the changes depicted in time series or pairs of Landsat images.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Temporal-Resolution Water Level and Storage Change Data Sets for Lakes on the Tibetan Plateau During 2000–2017 Using Mult
    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1603–1627, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1603-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. High-temporal-resolution water level and storage change data sets for lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2000–2017 using multiple altimetric missions and Landsat-derived lake shoreline positions Xingdong Li1, Di Long1, Qi Huang1, Pengfei Han1, Fanyu Zhao1, and Yoshihide Wada2 1State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 2International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2361 Laxenburg, Austria Correspondence: Di Long ([email protected]) Received: 21 February 2019 – Discussion started: 15 March 2019 Revised: 4 September 2019 – Accepted: 22 September 2019 – Published: 28 October 2019 Abstract. The Tibetan Plateau (TP), known as Asia’s water tower, is quite sensitive to climate change, which is reflected by changes in hydrologic state variables such as lake water storage. Given the extremely limited ground observations on the TP due to the harsh environment and complex terrain, we exploited multiple altimetric mis- sions and Landsat satellite data to create high-temporal-resolution lake water level and storage change time series at weekly to monthly timescales for 52 large lakes (50 lakes larger than 150 km2 and 2 lakes larger than 100 km2) on the TP during 2000–2017. The data sets are available online at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.898411 (Li et al., 2019). With Landsat archives and altimetry data, we developed water levels from lake shoreline posi- tions (i.e., Landsat-derived water levels) that cover the study period and serve as an ideal reference for merging multisource lake water levels with systematic biases being removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Data: Community Standard for Data Calibration
    LANDSAT DATA: COMMUNITY STANDARD FOR DATA CALIBRATION A Report of the National Geospatial Advisory Committee Landsat Advisory Group October 2020 Landsat Data: Community Standard for Data Calibration October 2020 LANDSAT DATA: COMMUNITY STANDARD FOR DATA CALIBRATION Executive Summary Landsat has become a widely recognized “gold” reference for Earth observation satellites. Landsat’s extensive historical record of highly calibrated data is a public good and exploited by other satellite operators to improve their data and products, and is becoming an open standard. However, the significance, value, and use case description of highly calibrated satellite data are typically not presented in a way that is understandable to general audiences. This paper aims to better communicate the fundamental importance of Landsat in making Earth observation data more accessible and interoperable for global users. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in early 2020, requested the Landsat Advisory Group (LAG), subcommittee of the National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) to prepare this paper for a general audience, clearly capturing the essence of Landsat’s “gold” standard standing. Terminology, descriptions, and specific examples are presented at a layperson’s level. Concepts emphasize radiometric, geometric, spectral, and cross-sensor calibration, without complex algorithms. Referenced applications highlight change detection, time-series analysis, crop type mapping and data fusion/harmonization/integration. Introduction The National Land Imaging Program leadership from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) requested that the Landsat Advisory Group (LAG), a subcommittee of the National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC), prepare a paper that accurately and coherently describes how Landsat data have become widely recognized as a radiometric and geometric calibration standard or “good-as-gold” reference for other multi-spectral satellite data.
    [Show full text]
  • GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan”
    GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan” Name (optional): Dr. Darrel Williams Position (optional): Chief Scientist, (240) 542-1106; [email protected] Institution (optional): Global Science & Technology, Inc. Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Global Science & Technology, Inc. (GST) is pleased to provide the following answers as a contribution towards OSTP’s effort to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In our response we provide information to support three main themes: 1. There is strong science need for high temporal resolution of moderate spatial resolution satellite earth observation that can be achieved with cost effective, innovative new approaches. 2. Operational programs need to be designed to obtain sustained climate data records. Continuity of Earth observations can be achieved through more efficient and economical means. 3. We need programs to address the integration of remotely sensed data with in situ data. GST has carefully considered these important national Earth observation issues over the past few years and has submitted the following RFI responses: The USGS RFI on Landsat Data Continuity Concepts (April 2012), NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging Architecture RFI (September 2013), and This USGEO RFI (November 2013) relative to OSTP’s efforts to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In addition to the above RFI responses, GST led the development of a mature, fully compliant flight mission concept in response to NASA’s Earth Venture-2 RFP in September 2011. Our capacity to address these critical national issues resides in GST’s considerable bench strength in Earth science understanding (Drs. Darrel Williams, DeWayne Cecil, Samuel Goward, and Dixon Butler) and in NASA systems engineering and senior management oversight (Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Field Analysis from the Satellite Missions CHAMP and GOCE
    Institut fÄurAstronomische und Physikalische GeodÄasie Gravity Field Analysis from the Satellite Missions CHAMP and GOCE Martin K. Wermuth VollstÄandigerAbdruck der von der FakultÄatfÄurBauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen der Technischen UniversitÄatMÄunchen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. U. Stilla PrÄuferder Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing., Dr. h.c. R. Rummel 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. N. Sneeuw, UniversitÄatStuttgart Die Dissertation wurde am 04.03.2008 bei der Technischen UniversitÄatMÄunchen eingereicht und durch die FakultÄatfÄurBauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen am 04.07.2008 angenommen. Zusammenfassung In dieser Arbeit ist die Bestimmung von globalen Schwerefeldmodellen aus Beobachtungen der Satelliten- missionen CHAMP und GOCE beschrieben. Im Fall von CHAMP wird die sogenannte Energieerhaltungs- Methode auf GPS Beobachtungen des tief fliegenden CHAMP Satelliten angewandt. Im Fall von GOCE ist Gradiometrie die wichtigste BeobachtungsgrÄo¼e.Die Erfahrung die bei der Verarbeitung von Echt- daten der CHAMP Mission gewonnen wurde, fließt in die Entwicklung einer operationellen Quick-look Software fÄurdie GOCE Mission ein. Die Aufgabe globaler Schwerefeldbestimmung ist es, aus Beobach- tungen entlang einer Satellitenbahn ein Model des Gravitationsfeldes der Erde abzuleiten, das auf der Erdoberfl¨ache in sphÄarisch-harmonischen Koe±zienten beschrieben wird. Die theoretischen Grundla- gen, die nÄotigsind um die Beobachtungen mit dem Schwerefeld in Bezug zu setzen und ein globales Schwerefeld aus Satellitenbeobachtungen zu berechnen sind werden ausfÄuhrlich erklÄart. Die CHAMP Mission wurde im Jahr 2000 gestartet. Sie ist die erste Schwerefeldmission mit einem GPS EmpfÄangeran Bord. Die HauptbeobachtungsgrÄo¼ensind die GPS Bahn-Beobachtungen zu CHAMP, das sogenannte "satellite-to-satellite tracking" (SST). Ein Schwerefeldmodell wird mit der Energieerhaltungs- Methode unter Verwendung von kinematischen Bahnen berechnet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prototype WRF-Based Ensemble Data Assimilation System for Dynamically Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Observations
    118 JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY VOLUME 12 A Prototype WRF-Based Ensemble Data Assimilation System for Dynamically Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Observations DUSANKA ZUPANSKI* CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado SARA Q. ZHANG NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland MILIJA ZUPANSKI CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado ARTHUR Y. HOU NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland SAMSON H. CHEUNG University of California, Davis, Davis, California (Manuscript received 12 January 2010, in final form 23 August 2010) ABSTRACT In the near future, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission will provide precipitation observations with un- precedented accuracy and spatial/temporal coverage of the globe. For hydrological applications, the satellite observations need to be downscaled to the required finer-resolution precipitation fields. This paper explores a dynamic downscaling method using ensemble data assimilation techniques and cloud-resolving models. A prototype ensemble data assimilation system using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) has been developed. A high-resolution regional WRF with multiple nesting grids is used to provide the first-guess and ensemble forecasts. An ensemble assimilation algorithm based on the maximum likelihood ensemble filter (MLEF) is used to perform the analysis. The forward observation operators from NOAA–NCEP’s gridpoint statistical interpolation (GSI) are incorporated for using NOAA–NCEP operational datastream, including conven- tional data and clear-sky satellite observations. Precipitation observation operators are developed with a combination of the cloud-resolving physics from NASA Goddard cumulus ensemble (GCE) model and the radiance transfer schemes from NASA Satellite Data Simulation Unit (SDSU). The prototype of the system is used as a test bed to optimally combine observations and model information to produce a dynamically downscaled precipitation analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment
    1 Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment: Progress, Past 2 Challenges and Future Opportunities 3 4 Harry West, Nevil Quinn & Michael Horswell 5 Centre for Water, Communities & Resilience; Department of Geography & Environmental 6 Management; University of the West of EnglanD, Bristol 7 8 CorresponDing Author: Harry West ([email protected]) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 24 Remote Sensing for Drought Monitoring & Impact Assessment: Progress, Past 25 Challenges and Future Opportunities 26 27 Abstract 28 Drought is a common hydrometeorological phenomenon anD a pervasive global hazarD. As 29 our climate changes, it is likely that Drought events will become more intense anD frequent. 30 Effective Drought monitoring is therefore critical, both to the research community in 31 Developing an unDerstanDing of Drought, anD to those responsible for Drought management 32 anD mitigation. Over the past 50 years remote sensing has shifteD the fielD away from 33 reliance on traditional site-baseD measurements anD enableD observations anD estimates of 34 key drought-relateD variables over larger spatial anD temporal scales than was previously 35 possible. This has proven especially important in Data poor regions with limiteD in-situ 36 monitoring stations. Available remotely senseD Data proDucts now represent almost all 37 aspects of Drought propagation anD have contributeD to our unDerstanDing of the 38 phenomena. In this review we chart the rise of remote sensing for Drought monitoring, 39 examining key milestones anD technologies for assessing meteorological, agricultural anD 40 hyDrological Drought events. We reflect on challenges the research community has faceD to 41 Date, such as limitations associateD with Data recorD length anD spatial, temporal anD 42 spectral resolution.
    [Show full text]