DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Satellite Data in the Joint Center for Satellite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Satellite Data in the Joint Center for Satellite The Impact of Satellite Data in the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation John Le Marshall (JCSDA) Director, JCSDA 2004-2007 Lars-Peter Rishojgaard 2007- … Overview • Background • The Challenge • The JCSDA • The Satellite Program • Recent Advances • Impact of Satellite Data • Plans/Future Prospects • Summary CDAS/Reanl vs GFS NH/SH 500Hpa day 5 Anomaly Correlation (20-80 N/S) 90 NH GFS 85 SH GFS NH CDAS/Reanl 80 SH CDAS/Reanl 75 70 65 60 Anomaly Correlation Anomaly Correlation 55 50 45 40 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 YEAR Data Assimilation Impacts in the NCEP GDAS N. Hemisphere 500 mb AC Z 20N - 80N Waves 1-20 15 Jan - 15 Feb '03 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 control 0.5 no amsu 0.4 no conv 0.3 Anomaly Correlation 0.2 0.1 0 1234567891011121314151617 Forecast [days] AMSU and “All Conventional” data provide nearly the same amount of improvement to the Northern Hemisphere. Impact of Removing Selected Satellite Data on Hurricane Track Forecasts in the East Pacific Basin 140 120 100 Control No AMSU 80 No HIRS 60 No GEO Wind 40 No QSC 20 Average Track ErrorsAverage [NM] 0 12 24 36 48 Forecst Time [hours] Anomaly correlation for days 0 to 7 for 500 hPa geopotential height in the zonal band 20°-80° for January/February. The red arrow indicate use of satellite data in the forecast model has doubled the length of a useful forecast. The Challenge Satellite Systems/Global Measurements GRACE Aqua Cloudsat CALIPSO TRMM SSMIS GIFTS TOPEX NPP Landsat MSG Meteor/ SAGE GOES-R COSMIC/GPS NOAA/ POES NPOESS SeaWiFS Terra Jason Aura ICESat SORCE WindSAT 5-Order Magnitude Increase in satellite Data Over 10 Years Daily Upper Air Satellite Instruments Observation Count by Platform NPOESS METEOP NOAA Windsat GOES DMSP Count Count (Millions) 1990 Year 2010 Year NPOESSNPOESS SatelliteSatellite -- OriginalOriginal CMIS ATMS CMIS- μwave imager VIIRS VIIRS- vis/IR imager CrIS CrIS- IR sounder ATMS- μwave sounder OMPS- ozone GPSOS- GPS occultation ADCS- data collection SESS- space environment APS- aerosol polarimeter SARSAT - search & rescue TSIS- solar irradiance OMPS ERBS ERBS- Earth radiation budget ALT- altimeter SS- survivability monitor TheThe NPOESSNPOESS spacecraftspacecraft hashas thethe requirementrequirement toto operateoperate inin threethree differentdifferent sunsun synchronoussynchronous orbits,orbits, 1330,1330, 21302130 andand 17301730 withwith differentdifferent configurationsconfigurations ofof fourteenfourteen differentdifferent environmentalenvironmental sensorssensors thatthat provideprovide environmentalenvironmental datadata recordsrecords (EDRs) (EDRs) for for space, space, ocean/ ocean/water,water, land, land, radiation radiation clouds clouds and and atmospheric atmospheric parameters. parameters. InIn orderorder toto meetmeet thisthis requirement,requirement, thethe primeprime NPOESSNPOESS contractor,contractor, NorthropNorthrop GrummanGrumman SpaceSpace Technology,Technology, isis usingusing theirtheir flight-qualifiedflight-qualified NPOESSNPOESS T430T430 spspacecraft.acecraft. ThisThis spacecraftspacecraft leverageleveragess extensiveextensive experienceexperience onon NASA’sNASA’s EOSEOS AquaAqua and and Aura Aura programs programs that that inte integratedgrated similar similar se sensorsnsors as as NPOESS. NPOESS. AsAs waswas requiredrequired forfor EOS,EOS, thethe NPOESSNPOESS T430T430 structurestructure isis anan opticallyoptically andand dynamicallydynamically stablestable platformplatform specificallyspecifically designeddesigned for for earth earth observation observation miss missionsions with with complex complex sensor sensor suites. suites. InIn orderorder toto managemanage engineering,engineering, desidesign,gn, andand integrationintegration risks,risks, aa single single spacecrspacecraftaft busbus forfor allall threethree orbitsorbits providesprovides cost-effectivecost-effective supportsupport forfor acceleratedaccelerated launchlaunch call-upcall-up andand operationoperation requirementrequirement changes.changes. InIn mostmost cases,cases, aa sensorsensor cancan bebe easilyeasily deployeddeployed inin aa differedifferentnt orbitorbit becausebecause itit willwill bebe placedplaced inin thethe samesame positionposition onon thethe anyany spacecraft.spacecraft. ThereThere areare ampleample resourceresource marginsmargins foforr thethe sensors,sensors, allowingallowing forfor compcompenensationsation duedue toto changeschanges inin sensorsensor requirementsrequirements and and future future planned planned improvements. improvements. TheThe spacecraftspacecraft stillstill hashas reservereserve massmass aandnd powerpower marginmargin forfor thethe mostmost stressstressiingng 13301330 orbit,orbit, whichwhich hashas eleveneleven sensors.sensors. TheThe fivefive panelpanel solarsolar array,array, expandableexpandable toto six,six, isis oneone design,design, providingproviding powerpower inin thethe differentdifferent orbitsorbits andand configurations.configurations. GOESGOES -- RR ABI – Advanced Baseline Imager Total radiances over 24 hours = 172, 500, 000, 000 GS – GOES Sounder SEISS – Space Environment In-Situ Suite including the Magnetospheric Particle Sensor (MPS); Energetic Heavy Ion Sensor (EHIS); Solar & Galactic Proton Sensor (SGPS) SIS – Solar Imaging Suite including the Solar X-Ray Imager (SXI); Solar X-Ray Sensor (SXS); Extreme Ultraviolet Sensor (EUVS) GLM – GEO Lightning Mapper The Center History April 2000, a small team of senior NASA and NOAA managers release a white paper1 containing plans to improve and increase the use of satellite data for global numerical weather models. The white paper provided a specific recommendation to establish a Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA). This white paper came in response to a growing urgency for more accurate and improved weather and climate analyses and forecasts. These improvements could only be made possible by the development of improved models and data assimilation techniques, which allow models to utilize more and better quality data. 1 A NASA and NOAA plan to maximize the utilization of satellite data to improve weather forecasts. Franco Einaudi, Louis Uccellini, James F. W. Purdom, Alexander Mac Donald, April 2000. History In 2001 the Joint Center was established2 by NASA and NOAA and in 2002, the JCSDA expanded its partnerships to include the U.S. Navy and Air Force weather agencies. 2 Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation: Luis Uccellini, Franco Einaudi, James F. W. Purdom, David Rogers: April 2000. JCSDA Partners Pending JCSDA Structure Associate Administrators NASA: Science NOAA: NESDIS, NWS, OAR DoD: Navy, Air Force Management Oversight Board of Directors: NOAA NWS: L. Uccellini (Chair) NASA GSFC: F. Einaudi Advisory Rotating NOAA NESDIS: M. Colton Chair Panel NOAA OAR: M. Uhart Navy: S. Chang USAF: J. Lanici/M. Farrar Technical Liaisons: Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Staff NOAA/NWS/NCEP – J. Derber Director: J. Le Marshall NASA/GMAO – M. Rienecker Science Deputy Directors: NOAA/OAR – A. Gasiewski Steering Stephen Lord – NWS /NCEP NOAA/NESDIS – D. Tarpley James Yoe - NESDIS Committee Navy – N. Baker Lars Peter Riishogjaard – GSFC, GMAO USAF – M. McATee Pat Phoebus – DoD,NRL Army – G. Mc Williams Secretary: Ada Armstrong Consultant: George Ohring JCSDA Structure Associate Administrators NASA: Science NOAA: NESDIS, NWS, OAR DoD: Navy, Air Force Management Oversight Board of Directors: NOAA NWS: L. Uccellini (Chair) NASA GSFC: F. Einaudi Advisory Rotating NOAA NESDIS: M. Colton Chair Panel NOAA OAR: M. Uhart Navy: S. Chang USAF: J. Lanici/M. Farrar Technical Liaisons: Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Staff NOAA/NWS/NCEP – J. Derber Director: Lars Peter Riishogjaard NASA/GMAO – M. Rienecker Science Deputy Directors: NOAA/OAR – A. Gasiewski Steering Stephen Lord – NWS /NCEP NOAA/NESDIS – D. Tarpley Committee Fuzhong Weng - NESDIS Navy – N. Baker M. Rienecker – GSFC, GMAO USAF – M. McATee Pat Phoebus – DoD,NRL Army – G. Mc Williams Secretary: Ada Armstrong Consultant: George Ohring JCSDA Advisory Board • Provides high level Contributions from guidance to JCSDA Name Organization Management Oversight T Hollingsworth ECMWF Board T. Vonder Haar CIRA P. Courtier Meteo France E. Kalnay UMD R. Anthes UCAR J. Purdom CIRA P. Rizzoli MIT JCSDA Science Steering Committee Contributions from • Provides scientific Name Organization guidance to JCSDA P. Menzel (Chair) NESDIS Director R. Atlas AOML − Reviews proposals C. Bishop NRL R. Errico GSFC − Reviews projects J. Eyre UK Met Office − Reviews priorities S. English UK Met Office L. Garand CMC A. McNally ECMWF G. Kelly ECMWF S.Koch ESRL B. Navasques KNMI F. Toepfer NWS A. Busalacchi ESSIC JCSDA Technical Liaisons •Technical Liaisons JCSDA Technical Liaisons Liaison Name Organization - Represent their J. Derber EMC organizations M. Rienecker GMAO - Review proposals A. Gasiewski OWAQR and project progress D. Tarpley ORA - Interact with N. Baker NRL principal M. McAtee AFWA investigators JCSDA Mission and Vision • Mission: Accelerate and improve the quantitative use of research and operational satellite data in weather. ocean, climate and environmental analysis and prediction models • Vision: A weather, ocean, climate and environmental analysis and prediction community empowered to effectively assimilate increasing amounts of advanced satellite observations and to effectively use the integrated observations of the GEOSS JCSDA Road Map (2002 - 2010) 3D VAR -----------------------------------------------------4D VAR By 2010, a numerical weather prediction community will be The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GPS Radio Occultation with CHAMP, GRACE-A, Terrasar-X, and COSMIC: Brief Review of Results from GFZ J
    GPS radio occultation with CHAMP, GRACE-A, TerraSAR-X, and COSMIC: Brief review of results from GFZ J. Wickert, G. Beyerle, C. Falck, S. Heise, R. König, G. Michalak, D. Pingel*, M. Rothacher, T. Schmidt, and C. Viehweg GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, * Deutscher Wetterdienst Overview Current GPS occultation missions During the last decade ground and space based GNSS techniques for atmospheric/ionospheric remote sensing were established. The currently increasing number of receiver platforms (e.g., extension of regional/global ground networks and additional LEO satellites) together with future additional transmitters (GALILEO, reactivated GLONASS, new signal structures for GPS) will extend the potential of these innovative sounding techniques during the next years. Here, we focus to GPS radio CHAMP GRACE TerraSAR-X occultation and present selected examples of recent GFZ results. The activities include orbit and atmospheric /ionospheric occultation data processing for several satellite mission (CHAMP,GRACE-A, SAC-C, and COSMIC), but also various applications. Data sets from CHAMP, GRACE and COSMIC MetOp COSMIC SAC-C Current GPS radio occultation missions: CHAMP (launch July 15, 2000), GRACE (March 17, 2002), TerraSAR-X (June 15, 2007), MetOp (October 18, 2006), COSMIC (April 15, 2006) and SAC-C(November 21, 2000). Number of daily available vertical atmospheric profiles, derived from CHAMP (left), GRACE (middle), and COSMIC (right, UCAR processing) measurements (note the different scale). COSMIC provides significantly more data compared to CHAMP and GRACE-A. The long-term set from CHAMP is unique (300 km orbit altitude expected in Dec. 2008). Validation of CHAMP with MOZAIC aircraft data Near-real time data from CHAMP and GRACE-A (a) (b) (c) GFZ provides near-real time occultation data (bending angle and refractivity profiles) from CHAMP and GRACE-A using it’s operational ground infrastructure including 2 receiving antennas at Ny Ålesund.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey and Assessment of the Capabilities of Cubesats for Earth Observation
    Acta Astronautica 74 (2012) 50–68 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Review A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation Daniel Selva a,n, David Krejci b a Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA b Vienna University of Technology, Vienna 1040, Austria article info abstract Article history: In less than a decade, Cubesats have evolved from purely educational tools to a standard Received 2 December 2011 platform for technology demonstration and scientific instrumentation. The use of COTS Accepted 9 December 2011 (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) components and the ongoing miniaturization of several technologies have already led to scattered instances of missions with promising Keywords: scientific value. Furthermore, advantages in terms of development cost and develop- Cubesats ment time with respect to larger satellites, as well as the possibility of launching several Earth observation satellites dozens of Cubesats with a single rocket launch, have brought forth the potential for University satellites radically new mission architectures consisting of very large constellations or clusters of Systems engineering Cubesats. These architectures promise to combine the temporal resolution of GEO Remote sensing missions with the spatial resolution of LEO missions, thus breaking a traditional trade- Nanosatellites Picosatellites off in Earth observation mission design. This paper assesses the current capabilities of Cubesats with respect to potential employment in Earth observation missions. A thorough review of Cubesat bus technology capabilities is performed, identifying potential limitations and their implications on 17 different Earth observation payload technologies. These results are matched to an exhaustive review of scientific require- ments in the field of Earth observation, assessing the possibilities of Cubesats to cope with the requirements set for each one of 21 measurement categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Multi-Satellite Altimetry Data with CHAMP and GRACE Egms for Geoid and Sea Surface Topography Determination
    Combination of multi-satellite altimetry data with CHAMP and GRACE EGMs for geoid and sea surface topography determination G.S. Vergos , V.N. Grigoriadis, I.N. Tziavos Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Box 440, 541 24, Thessalo- niki, Greece, Fax: +30 231 0995948, E-mail: [email protected]. M.G. Sideris Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Abstract. Since the launch of the first altimetric mis- repeating measurements of the sea surface. Such satel- sions a wealth of data for the sea surface has become lites are ERS1, ERS2 and ENVISAT and available and utilized for geoid and sea surface topogra- TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) with JASON-1. JASON-1 and phy modeling. The data from the gravity field dedicated ENVISAT are the latest on orbit satellites (December satellite missions of CHAMP and GRACE provide a 2001 and March 2002, respectively) and are both set on unique opportunity for combination studies with satel- exact repeat missions (ERM). lite altimetric observations. This study focuses on the This long series of altimetric observations has been combination of data from GEOSAT, ERS1/2, widely used for studies on the determination of MSS Topex/Poseidon, JASON-1 and ENVISAT with Earth models (Andersen and Knudsen 1998; Cazenave et al. Gravity Models (EGMs) generated from CHAMP and 1996), global and regional geoid models (Andritsanos et GRACE data to study the mean sea surface al. 2001; Lemoine et al. 1998; Vergos et al. 2005) as (MSS)/marine geoid in the Mediterranean Sea. Various well as on the recovery of gravity anomalies from al- combination methods, i.e., weighted least squares and timetric measurements (Andersen and Knudsen 1998; least squares collocation are investigated and conclu- Hwang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Field Analysis from the Satellite Missions CHAMP and GOCE
    Institut fÄurAstronomische und Physikalische GeodÄasie Gravity Field Analysis from the Satellite Missions CHAMP and GOCE Martin K. Wermuth VollstÄandigerAbdruck der von der FakultÄatfÄurBauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen der Technischen UniversitÄatMÄunchen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. U. Stilla PrÄuferder Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing., Dr. h.c. R. Rummel 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. N. Sneeuw, UniversitÄatStuttgart Die Dissertation wurde am 04.03.2008 bei der Technischen UniversitÄatMÄunchen eingereicht und durch die FakultÄatfÄurBauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen am 04.07.2008 angenommen. Zusammenfassung In dieser Arbeit ist die Bestimmung von globalen Schwerefeldmodellen aus Beobachtungen der Satelliten- missionen CHAMP und GOCE beschrieben. Im Fall von CHAMP wird die sogenannte Energieerhaltungs- Methode auf GPS Beobachtungen des tief fliegenden CHAMP Satelliten angewandt. Im Fall von GOCE ist Gradiometrie die wichtigste BeobachtungsgrÄo¼e.Die Erfahrung die bei der Verarbeitung von Echt- daten der CHAMP Mission gewonnen wurde, fließt in die Entwicklung einer operationellen Quick-look Software fÄurdie GOCE Mission ein. Die Aufgabe globaler Schwerefeldbestimmung ist es, aus Beobach- tungen entlang einer Satellitenbahn ein Model des Gravitationsfeldes der Erde abzuleiten, das auf der Erdoberfl¨ache in sphÄarisch-harmonischen Koe±zienten beschrieben wird. Die theoretischen Grundla- gen, die nÄotigsind um die Beobachtungen mit dem Schwerefeld in Bezug zu setzen und ein globales Schwerefeld aus Satellitenbeobachtungen zu berechnen sind werden ausfÄuhrlich erklÄart. Die CHAMP Mission wurde im Jahr 2000 gestartet. Sie ist die erste Schwerefeldmission mit einem GPS EmpfÄangeran Bord. Die HauptbeobachtungsgrÄo¼ensind die GPS Bahn-Beobachtungen zu CHAMP, das sogenannte "satellite-to-satellite tracking" (SST). Ein Schwerefeldmodell wird mit der Energieerhaltungs- Methode unter Verwendung von kinematischen Bahnen berechnet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prototype WRF-Based Ensemble Data Assimilation System for Dynamically Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Observations
    118 JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY VOLUME 12 A Prototype WRF-Based Ensemble Data Assimilation System for Dynamically Downscaling Satellite Precipitation Observations DUSANKA ZUPANSKI* CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado SARA Q. ZHANG NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland MILIJA ZUPANSKI CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado ARTHUR Y. HOU NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland SAMSON H. CHEUNG University of California, Davis, Davis, California (Manuscript received 12 January 2010, in final form 23 August 2010) ABSTRACT In the near future, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission will provide precipitation observations with un- precedented accuracy and spatial/temporal coverage of the globe. For hydrological applications, the satellite observations need to be downscaled to the required finer-resolution precipitation fields. This paper explores a dynamic downscaling method using ensemble data assimilation techniques and cloud-resolving models. A prototype ensemble data assimilation system using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) has been developed. A high-resolution regional WRF with multiple nesting grids is used to provide the first-guess and ensemble forecasts. An ensemble assimilation algorithm based on the maximum likelihood ensemble filter (MLEF) is used to perform the analysis. The forward observation operators from NOAA–NCEP’s gridpoint statistical interpolation (GSI) are incorporated for using NOAA–NCEP operational datastream, including conven- tional data and clear-sky satellite observations. Precipitation observation operators are developed with a combination of the cloud-resolving physics from NASA Goddard cumulus ensemble (GCE) model and the radiance transfer schemes from NASA Satellite Data Simulation Unit (SDSU). The prototype of the system is used as a test bed to optimally combine observations and model information to produce a dynamically downscaled precipitation analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Étude De Faisabilité Télédétection De L'écoulement De Surface Provenant D'amas Au Champ Et Enclos D'hivernage
    Étude de faisabilité Télédétection de l’écoulement de surface provenant d’amas au champ et enclos d’hivernage Présentée au : Ministère Développement durable, Environnement et Parcs Direction des politiques en milieu terrestre Édifice Marie-Guyart, 9e étage, boîte 71 675, boulevard René-Lévesque Est, Québec (Québec), G1R 5V7 Par Karem Chokmani, professeur Lisa-Marie Pâquet, assistante de recherche Yves Gauthier, agent de recherche Institut national de la recherche scientifique – Eau, Terre & Environnement 490 rue de la Couronne, Québec (Québec), G1K 9A9 Tél. : (418) 654-2570 Téléc. : (418) 654-2600 Courriel : [email protected] Rapport de recherche N° R-979 Avril 2008 ISBN : 978-2-89146- 568-7 ii AVANT PROPOS Dans le cadre des efforts du ministère du développement durable, de l’environnement et des parcs (MDDEP) pour valider et bonifier les connaissances sur la conception des amas de fumier au champ, l’équipe de recherche de l’INRS-ETE, sous la direction du professeur Karem Chokmani, a été mandaté par le ministère pour réaliser une étude de faisabilité pour la télédétection de l’écoulement de surface provenant d’amas au champ et d’enclos d’hivernage. Dans le présent rapport de recherche, après une section d’introduction consacrée à la problématique et aux objectifs, une synthèse de la revue de littérature et un exposé de la méthodologie de travail y sont présentés. Les résultats sont par la suite décrits et discutés pour finir avec les conclusions ainsi qu’une série de recommandations concernant la faisabilité de l’approche et la démarche à suivre pour son éventuelle application opérationnelle.
    [Show full text]
  • Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users
    Users, Uses, and Value of Landsat Satellite Imagery— Results from the 2012 Survey of Users By Holly M. Miller, Leslie Richardson, Stephen R. Koontz, John Loomis, and Lynne Koontz Open-File Report 2013–1269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey i U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2013 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Miller, H.M., Richardson, Leslie, Koontz, S.R., Loomis, John, and Koontz, Lynne, 2013, Users, uses, and value of Landsat satellite imagery—Results from the 2012 survey of users: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1269, 51 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131269. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms and Initialisms ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Aspects of Orbit Determination with GPS for Small Satellites with SAR Payloads Sergio De Florio, Tino Zehetbauer, Dr
    Deutsches Zentrum Microwave and Radar Institute für Luft und Raumfahrt e.V. Department Reconnaissance and Security Operational Aspects of Orbit Determination with GPS for Small Satellites with SAR Payloads Sergio De Florio, Tino Zehetbauer, Dr. Thomas Neff Phone: +498153282357, [email protected] Abstract Requirements Scientific small satellite missions for remote sensing with Synthetic Taylor expansion of the phase Φ of the radar signal as a Aperture Radar (SAR) payloads or high accuracy optical sensors, pose very function of time varying position, velocity and acceleration: strict requirements on the accuracy of the reconstructed satellite positions, velocities and accelerations. Today usual GPS receivers can fulfill the 4π 233 Φ==++++()t Rtap ()()01kk apttaptt ()(-) 02030 ()(-) k aptt ()(-) k ο () t accuracy requirements of this missions in most cases, but for low-cost- λ missions the decision for a appropriate satellite hardware has to take into Typical requirements, for 0.5 to 1.0 m image resolution, on account not only the reachable quality of data but also the costs. An spacecraft position vector x: analysis is carried out in order to assess which on board and ground equipment, which type of GPS data and processing methods are most −−242 appropriate to minimize mission costs and full satisfying mission payload x≤≤⋅≤⋅ 15 mmsms x 1.5 10 / x 6.0 10 / (3σ ) requirements focusing the attention on a SAR payload. These are requirements on the measurements, not on the real motion of the satellite Required Hardware Typical Position
    [Show full text]
  • CHAMP, GRACE, SAC-C, Terrasar-X/Tandem-X: Science Results, Status and Future Prospects 1 Introduction
    CHAMP, GRACE, SAC-C, TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X: Science results, status and future prospects J. Wickert1, C. Arras1, C.O. Ao2, G. Beyerle1, C. Falck1, L. Grunwaldt1, S.B. Healy3, S. Heise1, A. Helm1, C.Y. Huang4, N. Jakowski5, R. Konig¨ 1, T. Mannucci2, C. Mayer5, G. Michalak1, P. Poli6, M. Rothacher1, T. Schmidt1, R. Stosius1, and B. Tapley7 1 Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), Potsdam, Germany 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, U.S. 3 European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, England 4 National Central University (NCU), Chong Li, Taiwan 5 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Neustrelitz, Germany 6 Meteo France, Toulouse, France 7 University of Texas, Austin, U.S. (contact: [email protected]) ABSTRACT More and more satellites apply the GPS (Global Positioning System) radio occultation (RO) technique for precise sound- ing of the Earth’s atmosphere and ionosphere on a global scale. A milestone for the recognition of this quite new remote sensing method was reached, when ECMWF and MetOffice started operational assimilation of GPS occultation data to improve global weather forecasts in 2006. Currently the major part of the operational available RO data is provided by the six satellite U.S.-Taiwan constellation FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC (FORMOsa SATellite mission-3/Constellation Ob- serving System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate). Data from the European operational Metop satellite (GRAS - GNSS Receiver for Atmospheric Sounding, launched 2006) are expected to be available in the near future. However, besides these dedicated RO missions, the operation of several GPS RO receivers is based on a mission-of-opportunity (MoO) concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Pre-CHAMP Gravity Models GRIM5-S1 and GRIM5-C1 with Satellite Crossover Altimetry
    GEoFonscHUNGSZENTRUM PoTsonM STIFTUNG DES ÖFFENTLICHEN RECHTS Jaroslav Klokocn ik, Christoph Reigber, Peter Schwintzer, Carl A. Wagner, Jan Kostelecky Evaluation of pre-CHAMP Gravity Models GRIMS-51 and GRIM5-C1 with Satellite Crossover Altimetry Scientific Technical Report STR00/22 Jaroslav Klokocnfk, Christoph Reigber, Peter Schwintzer, Carl A. Wagner, Jan Kostelecky Evaluation of pre-CHAMP Gravity Models GRIMS-51 and GRIM5-C1 with Satellite Crossover Altimetry DOI: http://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-00228 ImURN: print urn:nbn:de:kobv:b103-00228 Scientific Technical Report STR00/22 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Telegrafenberg D-14473 Potsdam e-mail: [email protected] www: http://www.gfz-potsdam.de Printed in Potsdam/Germany November 2000 1 EVALUATION OF pre-CHAMP Content GRAVITY MODELS "GRIM5-Sl" AND "GRIM5-Cl" WITH SATELLITE CROSSOVER ALTIMETRY Summary „. „. „ ........ „. „ ... „ .......... „ „ ....... „ .. „ „ „ ........ „ .. „ .. „ „ .. „ ... „ ... „. 2 1 2 1 1 3 Jaroslav Klokocnik , , Christoph Reigber , Peter Schwintzer , Carl A, Wagner , Content. „ .. „ „ „ ....... „ .. „ ...... „„ .... „ ... „ .. „ ...... „ „ ....... „ ... „„„. „. „ .. „ .... „. 3 4 Jan Kostelecky 1. Introduction „ „ ...... „ ... „ .. „ ....... „ „. „ ..... „ .. „. „ „ „ „ „ ... „ .... „ ..... „ .. „. „ .. „ 4 2. Methodology ........... „ „. „ .. „ ..... „ „ „ ..... „. „ .. „ „ „ ..... „ ........ „ .... „ ......... „ .5 1 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ), 2.1. Single satellite crossovers „ „ .. „ .. „ „ „ .... „. „ ... „ „ ... „ ..... „. „. „ ... „ „ ..
    [Show full text]
  • Validation Des Produits D'inversion Des Observations Satellitaires
    Validation des produits d’inversion des observations satellitaires CALIPSO/CloudSat pour la caractérisation des propriétés optiques et microphysiques des nuages de glace et en phase mixte Guillaume Mioche To cite this version: Guillaume Mioche. Validation des produits d’inversion des observations satellitaires CALIPSO/CloudSat pour la caractérisation des propriétés optiques et microphysiques des nu- ages de glace et en phase mixte. Océan, Atmosphère. Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand II, 2010. Français. NNT : 2010CLF22026. tel-00719316 HAL Id: tel-00719316 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00719316 Submitted on 19 Jul 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. N° d’Ordre : D.U. 2026 UNIVERSITE BLAISE PASCAL U.F.R. Sciences et Technologies ECOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES FONDAMENTALES N° : 643 THESE présentée pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR D’UNIVERSITE Spécialité : Physique de l’Atmosphère par MIOCHE Guillaume Titulaire du Master Recherche spécialité Physico-Chimie de l’Atmosphère et du Climat Validation des produits d’inversion
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 EOS Reference Handbook
    1999 EOS Reference Handbook A Guide to NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise and the Earth Observing System http://eos.nasa.gov/ 1999 EOS Reference Handbook A Guide to NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise and the Earth Observing System Editors Michael D. King Reynold Greenstone Acknowledgements Special thanks are extended to the EOS Prin- Design and Production cipal Investigators and Team Leaders for providing detailed information about their Sterling Spangler respective instruments, and to the Principal Investigators of the various Interdisciplinary Science Investigations for descriptions of their studies. In addition, members of the EOS Project at the Goddard Space Flight Center are recognized for their assistance in verifying and enhancing the technical con- tent of the document. Finally, appreciation is extended to the international partners for For Additional Copies: providing up-to-date specifications of the instruments and platforms that are key ele- EOS Project Science Office ments of the International Earth Observing Mission. Code 900 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Support for production of this document, Greenbelt, MD 20771 provided by Winnie Humberson, William Bandeen, Carl Gray, Hannelore Parrish and Phone: (301) 441-4259 Charlotte Griner, is gratefully acknowl- Internet: [email protected] edged. Table of Contents Preface 5 Earth Science Enterprise 7 The Earth Observing System 15 EOS Data and Information System (EOSDIS) 27 Data and Information Policy 37 Pathfinder Data Sets 45 Earth Science Information Partners and the Working Prototype-Federation 47 EOS Data Quality: Calibration and Validation 51 Education Programs 53 International Cooperation 57 Interagency Coordination 65 Mission Elements 71 EOS Instruments 89 EOS Interdisciplinary Science Investigations 157 Points-of-Contact 340 Acronyms and Abbreviations 354 Appendix 361 List of Figures 1.
    [Show full text]