Ed 355 524 Author Title Institution Report No Pub Date Note Available from Pub Type Edrs Price Descriptors Document Resume Cs 21
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 355 524 CS 213 728 AUTHOR Ray, Ruth E. TITLE The Practice of Theory: Teacher Research in Composition. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-3660-5 PUB DATE 93 NOTE 197p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 36605-3050: $14.95 members, $19.95 non-members). PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *College English; English Curriculum; *English Instruction; Feminism; Higher Education; High Schools; Reader Text Relationship; Teaching Methods; *Theory Practice Relationship; *Writing Instruction; *Writing Research IDENTIFIERS *Composition Theory; English Teachers; *Feminist Criticism; Teacher Researchers; Writing To Learn ABSTRACT This book offers teachers a convenient means of broadening their understanding of various kinds of composition theory and the steadily emerging field of teacher research by high school and college instructors. The book is designed to arouse individual teachers' interest in composition theory and encourage them to learn about and participate in teacher research. The book covers the various branches of teacher research and the key ideas of its many proponents. Individual chapters include:(1) The Move toward Theory in Composition; (2) Theory and Practice from a Feminist Perspective; (3) The Argument for Teacher Research; (4) Comprehension from Within: K-12 Teacher Research and the Construction of Knowledge; (5) Contextual Constraints on Knowledge Making: Graduate Student Teacher Research; and (6) Toward a Teacher-Research Approach to Graduate Studies. An interview with National Writing Project Teacher-Researchers, along with a sample syllabus for a graduate course in composition theory, are appended. (HB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** I a g k I I IIS I U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Improvement "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS Mee d Educational Research and EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES SINFORMATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY CENTEERIC) oriThis document has been reproducedas oict,austi received from the parson ororganuation ongsnahng a O Minot catnips nave wanmade to improve B ST COPY AVAILABLE reproduction ouslity Points of view or opmoonsstatd inthis docu- mint do not noctsaanlyrepresent official TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES 0E141 I:racoon or policy INFORMATION CENTER (MCI The Practice of Theory a College Section Committee Cynthia Selfe, Chair Michigan Technological University Lil Brannon SUNY at Albany Miriam T. Chaplin Rutgers University Doris 0. Ginn, CCCC Representative Jackson State University Brenda M. Greene Medgar Evers College, CUNY Jeanette Harris University of Southern Mississippi Tom Waldrep University of South Carolina Tilly Warnock University of Arizona James Raymond University of Alabama H. Thomas McCracken, CEE Representative Youngstown State University Louise Smith University of Massachusetts at Boston James E. Davis, Executive Comn ittee Liaison Ohio University Miles Myers, NCTE Staff Liaison . The Practice of Theory Teacher Research in Composition Ruth E. Ray Wayne State University a National Council of Teachers of English 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois61801-1096 ;) NC. 1 h. College Level Editorial Board: Rafael Castillo, Gail E. flawisher, Joyce Kinkead, Charles Moran, Louise Wetherbee Phelps, Charles Suhor, chairex officio, Michael Spooner, ex officio Staff Editors: Sheila A. Ryan and Michelle Sanden Johlas Cover Design: Doug Burnett Interior Design: Tom Kovacs for TGK Design NCTE Stock Number 36605-3050 © 1993 by the National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. It is the policy of NCTE in its journals and other publications to providea forum for the open discussion of ideas concerning the content and the teaching of English and the language arts. Publicity accorded toany particular point of view does not imply endorsement by the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors, or the membership at large, except in announcements of policy, where such endorsement is clearly specified. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ray, Ruth E., 1954 The practice of theory : teacher research in composition / Ruth E. Ray. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8141-3660-5 1. English languageComposition and exercisesStudy and teachingResearchUnited States. 2. English languageRhetoricStudy and teachingResearchUnited States.3. Action research in educationUnited States. I. Title LB 1576.R391993 808'.042'07dc20 92-41456 CEP #.1 Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction: The Search for a Perspective ix I Challenging the Theory-Practice Relationship 1. The Move toward Theory in Composition 3 2.Theory and Practice from a Feminist Perspective 25 II Articulating the Teacher-Research Perspective, K-12 3. The Argument for Teacher Research 49 4. Comprehension from Within:K-12Teacher Research and the Construction of Knowledge 76 )11 Toward Theory-Based Practice and Practice-Based Theory 5.Contextual Constraints on Knowledge Making: Graduate Student Teacher Research 103 6.Toward a Teacher-Research Approach to Graduate Studies 139 Epilogue 158 Appendix A: Interview of National Writing Project Teacher-Researchers 161 Appendix B: English 702Studies in Composition Theory 162 Appendix C: Permission to Participate 169 v .. vi Contents Works Cited 171 Index 183 Author 191 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the following people for their assistance in the completion of this manuscript: Ellen Barton, academic confidante and friend, who read every chapter carefully and "talked up" the book with students and colleagues whenever she got the chance. Everyone should have such an advocate. Anonymous Reviewer #2 from Nt.,111 who gave the early draft a good, stiff critique and forced me to consider more carefully how the feminist perspective described in Chapter 2 might inform a revision of graduate education in composition. The National Writing Project teachers of metro Detroit who opened up their world to me through interviews and meetings during the summer of1990. The students in my1991English702seminar who had enough faith to conduct interpretive research in their own classrooms and then let me write about it. Tina Pawlak and Diane Kasunic, my Mastermind partners, who resolutely spoke of this book as a "done deal" every time I expressed any doubts about finishing it. Michael Spooner, senior editor for publications, whose positivity, coupled with his intelligence and accessibility, made working with NCTE a pleasure. vii Introduction: The Search for a Perspective This book began as a personal search, motivated by my own need to know how I as a composition specialist fit into a university English department in which the teaching of literature and the practice of literary criticism are the primary activities. An ongoing issue for me has been to understand and articulate my relationship to my literary colleagues: What interests and concerns do we share? How might the connections I see between their inquiries and mine enhance my own teaching and research in composition? In the process of researching and writing this book, I came to realize that my personal issue was more largely representative of the issues facingcomposition faculty everywhere. Thus, by way of introducing this book and its motives, I offer in these first few pages an autobiographical statement. I hope that readers will see in my background elements of their own professional lives which will help them understand the theoretical connections I have made, the conclusions I have drawn, and my reasons for looking to feminist studies and teacherresearch for a broader perspective on composition. A teacher at heart, from my first day as assistant professor I felt at odds with many of my colleagues who were literary critics and theoreticians. My educational and professional experiences were not the credentials of a literary theorist: I had an undergraduate degree in journalism and experience as a newspaper reporter and feature writer; I had worked in public relations; spent two years as a technical writer; worked as a tutor and part-time teacher of remedial writing; earned a master's degree in linguistics and composition; spent seven years as a nontenure-track lecturer while directing a tutoringlab, served as assistant director of composition, coordinated placement and proficiency testing, and taught all forms of undergraduate writ- ing; and earned a doctor of arts degree with an emphasis in composi- tion theory and applied linguistics. By the time my dissertation was completed, I had already spent nearly ten years as an adjunct faculty member and lecturer in compo- sition. Still, I was not fully prepared for life on the tenure track, where my previous experience did not really "count" for much in termsof ix 1 1) x The Practice of Theory a scholarly record. What mattered now was what I thought and wrote. However, my research, which I saw as a natural outgrowth of teaching and tutoring, was anomalous to many of my colleagues: they asked me to justify my tacit belief that composition was "intellectually respect- able"; challenged me to support the "empirical bias" of my work; critiqued it for being "too pedagogical," "atheoretical,"