DOCSLIB.ORG

Backpressure Steam Power Generation in District Energy and CHP - Energy Efficiency Considerations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Backpressure Steam Power Generation in District Energy and CHP - Energy Efficiency Considerations Backpressure Steam Power Generation in District Energy and CHP - Energy Efficiency Considerations A 1st Law, 2nd Law and Economic Analysis of the Practical Steam Engine in a District Energy/CHP Application Joshua A. Tolbert, Ph.D. Practical Steam Energy Efficiency Engineering – How is efficiency calculated? • What is the Status Quo? – Engineers currently focus on limiting energy losses as the primary point of focus for district energy and CHP systems – Only local energy losses are typically considered causing energy efficiency opportunities to be wasted • Why? – Conventional wisdom tells us that minimizing local energy losses is ultimate goal • How should we change? – Could a different approach improve global efficiency? Motivation Common Questions: 1. How can installing an imperfect device in parallel to an isenthalpic pressure reducing valve (PRV) improve efficiency? 2. My analysis shows an incremental fuel cost with PRV parallel, how can this be more efficient? Analysis Overview • Consider a Practical Steam Engine (PSE) in a Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) parallel district energy application • PSE operation is consistent with CHP application • Consider 1st Law, 2nd Law and economic analysis for energy efficiency • Draw conclusions Backpressure Application – Case Study Enwave Seattle - District Energy / CHP Application Assumptions Equipment • 1.5 MW (5.118 MMBtu/hr) • Practical Steam Engine (PSE) heating load is considered o Isentropic efficiency of 80% • Condensate exiting load: o Mechanical efficiency of 80% Saturate liquid at 20 psig o Generator efficiency of 95% • No heat losses in piping or • Isenthalpic PRV equipment* • 150 psig saturated steam boiler • 80% boiler and feedwater pump efficiency *Incorporating actual heat losses does not significantly affect results of analysis. 1st Law of Thermodynamics • 1st law of thermodynamics is simply a conservation of energy • All energy is conserved – no energy is destroyed. • Steady State: o Sum of all energy into system = sum of energy out of system • Considers only the quantity of energy, not the quality 1st Law Analysis – PRV Status Quo • Heating Only FEEDWATER FUEL 퐵푡푢 • ℎ = ℎ = 1,196 표푢푡 푛 푙푏푚 o Superheated Steam (57°F Superheat) BOILER 푄푂푢푡 푙푏푠 STEAM IN • 푚 = = 5,285 ℎ표푢푡−ℎ푐표푛푑푒푛푠푎푡푒 ℎ푟 푀푀퐵푡푢 PRV • 퐸 = 푄 + 푊 = 6.398 푛 푛 푛 ℎ푟 푀푀퐵푡푢 • 퐸 = 푄 = 5.118 STEAM OUT 푂푢푡 표푢푡 ℎ푟 푠푡 퐸표푢푡 • 1 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푅푉 = = 80% 퐸푖푛 HEATING LOAD HEAT CONDENSATE OUT 1st Law Analysis – PSE • Combined Heat and Power FEEDWATER FUEL 퐵푡푢 • ℎ = ℎ − ℎ − ℎ η = 1,101 표푢푡 푛 푛 2푠 푠푒푛푡푟표푝푐 푙푏푚 MECHANICAL LOSSES BOILER o Saturated Vapor (92.9% Quality) 푄푂푢푡 푙푏푠 STEAM IN • 푚 = = 5,862 ℎ표푢푡−ℎ푐표푛푑푒푛푠푎푡푒 ℎ푟 POWER 푀푀퐵푡푢 • 퐸 = 푄 + 푊 = 7.096 GENERATOR PSE 푛 푛 푛 ℎ푟 • 푊 = ℎ푛 − ℎ표푢푡 η푚푒푐ℎη푒푛푒푟푎푡표푟 = 124.5 [푘푊푒] STEAM OUT 푀푀퐵푡푢 GENERATOR LOSSES • 퐸 = 푄 + 푊 = 5.543 푂푈푇 푂푈푇 푂푈푇 ℎ푟 HEATING LOAD 퐸푂푢푡 • 1푠푡 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푆퐸 = = 78.1% HEAT 퐸푖푛 CONDENSATE OUT 1st Law Analysis – PRV Broad Perspective • Separate Heat and Power FEEDWATER FUEL • Consider Power Plant Thermal Efficiency = 40%* FUEL BOILER 푃 • 퐴푑푑푡표푛푎푙 퐹푢푒푙 퐼푛푝푢푡 = = η푃표푤푒푟 푃푙푎푛푡 푀푀퐵푡푢 STEAM IN 0.425 ℎ푟 푀푀퐵푡푢 POWER • 퐸 = 푄 + 푊 = 7.672 PRV 푛 푛 푛 ℎ푟 PLANT 푀푀퐵푡푢 • 퐸 = 푄 + 푊 = 5.543 푂푢푡 표푢푡 푂푢푡 ℎ푟 STEAM OUT LOSSES 퐸푂푢푡 • 1푠푡 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦 = = 72.2% 푃푆퐸 퐸 푖푛 POWER HEATING LOAD HEAT CONDENSATE OUT *33% US Average for steam generator power plants in 2013 (U.S. EIA) 1st Law Analysis - Comparison PRV** PSE** LOCAL PERSPECTIVE BROAD PERSPECTIVE • 1푠푡 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푅푉 = • 푃푢푟푐ℎ푎푠푒푑 푃표푤푒푟 = • Incremental Heat Addition = 80% 푀푀퐵푡푢 124.5 푘푊푒 0.619 ℎ푟 • Heating Only • 1푠푡 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦 = 푃푅푉 • 푃표푤푒푟 푂푢푡푝푢푡 = 124.5 푘푊 72.2% 푒 • 68.6% Thermal Efficiency • Separate Heat and Power Power Production* • 1푠푡 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푆퐸 = 78.1% • Combined Heat and Power *33% US Average for steam generator power plants in 2013 (U.S. EIA) **PRV supplies 57° Superheated steam to heating load, PSE supplies 92.9% quality saturated steam to heating load. Economic Analysis Assumptions Results • Fuel Cost: $5/MMBtu* • PRV • Electricity Cost: $0.075/kWh* o Fuel Costs = $241K/yr • PSE • Annual Operation = 8500 hrs o Fuel Costs = $267K/yr • PSE Maintenance costs = o Incremental Fuel Costs = $4,000/yr $26K/yr o Power = $80K/yr o Net Savings = $50K/yr** o Produces power at $0.025/kWh *Based on Seattle industrial rates **Including maintenance costs 2nd Law of Thermodynamics • 2nd law of thermodynamics considers the quality of the energy, reversibility of processes and the ability of the energy to do work – EXERGY • Exergy sometimes referred to as the “available energy” or “availability” • Exergy is a measure of the maximum useful work possible during a process that brings the system to equilibrium with a heat reservoir • Sum of exergy out of system ≤ sum of exergy into system • Energy never destroyed (1st Law), exergy can be destroyed (2nd Law) 2nd Law Analysis – Practical Example • Consider heat dissipating from a boiler in which all heat energy could be retained in the surroundings and recovered. o 1st law would consider this 100% efficient. o Recovered energy is at a lower temperature and therefore a lower quality, or exergy. o Not possible to take this energy and put it back into the boiler without some additional work or heat input. o Heat cannot be used to produce much useful work. o Some exergy, the ability to do work, was lost while all energy was retained. 1st law efficiency = 100%; 2nd law efficiency < 100% 2nd Law Analysis – Fluid Flow Exergy • Fluid Flow exergy is defined as a function of enthalpy and entropy in reference to dead state as follows (KE and PE neglected): • ψ = ℎ − ℎ0 − 푇0 푠 − 푠0 • ℎ0 = 푑푒푎푑 푠푡푎푡푒 푒푛푡ℎ푎푙푝푦 • 푇0 = 푑푒푎푑 푠푡푎푡푒 푡푒푚푝푒푟푎푡푢푟푒 • 푠0 = 푑푒푎푑 푠푡푎푡푒 푒푛푡푟표푝푦 • The dead state is the state that is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings. o Assumed in our study to be 70°F and 1 atm Mollier Diagram – PSE vs PRV 1220 1200 1180 1160 1140 Enthalpy (Btu/lbm) Saturation Curve 1120 PRV Pressure Reduction 1100 PSE Expansion 1080 1.54 1.56 1.58 1.6 1.62 1.64 1.66 1.68 1.7 1.72 1.74 Entropy (Btu/lbm*R) ψ = ℎ − ℎ0 − 푇0 푠 − 푠0 2nd Law Analysis – PRV Local Perspective 푀푀퐵푡푢 EXERGY IN • 푋푛 = ψ푛 ∗ 푚 = 1.952 ℎ푟 (STEAM) 푀푀퐵푡푢 • 푋 = ψ ∗ 푚 = 1.491 표푢푡 표푢푡 ℎ푟 EXERGY LOSS (ENTROPY GENERATION) • 퐸푥푒푟푔푦 퐷푒푠푡푟푢푐푡표푛 = 푋푛 − 푀푀퐵푡푢 PRV 푋 = 0.461 = 23.6% 표푢푡 ℎ푟 푋 • 2푛푑 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦 = 표푢푡 = 푋푖푛 76.4% EXERGY OUT (STEAM) 2nd Law Analysis – PSE Local Perspective EXERGY IN 푀푀퐵푡푢 (STEAM) • 푋 = ψ ∗ 푚 = 2.165 EXERGY LOSS 푛 푛 ℎ푟 (GENERATOR) • 푋표푢푡 = ψ표푢푡 ∗ 푚 + 푊 = 퐵푡푢 EXERGY LOSS 1.928 (ENTROPY 푙푏푚 GENERATION) PSE GENERATOR • 퐸푥푒푟푔푦 퐷푒푠푡푟푢푐푡표푛 = 푋푛 − 퐵푡푢 푋 = 0.237 = 10.9% 표푢푡 푙푏푚 푋 • 2푛푑 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦 = 표푢푡 = 푋 EXERGY LOSS EXERGY OUT 푖푛 (MECHANICAL) (POWER) 89.1% EXERGY OUT (STEAM) 2nd Law Analysis - Comparison PRV PSE 푀푀퐵푡푢 푀푀퐵푡푢 • 푋푛 = 1.952 • 푋 = 2.165 ℎ푟 푛 ℎ푟 퐵푡푢 퐵푡푢 • ψ표푢푡 = 282.2 • ψ = 256. 4 푙푏푚 표푢푡 푙푏푚 푀푀퐵푡푢 푊 퐵푡푢 • 푋표푢푡 = 1.491 • = 73.0 ℎ푟 푚 푙푏푚 • Exergy Destruction = 23.6% 퐵푡푢 • 푋 = 1.928 표푢푡 푙푏푚 • 2푛푑 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푅푉 = 76.4% • Exergy Destruction = 10.9% • Did not consider exergy destruction at power plant • 2푛푑 퐿푎푤 퐸푓푓푐푒푛푐푦푃푆퐸 = 89.1% Summary – PSE vs PRV District Energy and CHP • 1st law efficiency o Thermal efficiency for PSE is less than for local perspective PRV but better than broad perspective PRV. o PSE produced power at > 68% thermal efficiency • System economics o PSE power generation more than makes up for incremental fuel costs o PSE produced power at rate around $0.025/kWh, 1/3 of local purchased rate • 2nd law efficiency o With PSE more “useful” energy was conserved o More broad perspective would prove increased efficiency differential between PRV and PSE Conclusions • A local 1st law analysis can hide energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities • Broad 1st law analysis can be more informative and consistent with economics • A reduced local 1st law efficiency can coincide with improved economics, improved broad perspective 1st law analysis and an improved 2nd law efficiency • Broad 1st law analysis, as well as economic and 2nd law analyses, should be used when considering system energy efficiency • Use of the Practical Steam Engine in district energy and CHP applications can improve global energy efficiency as well as improve system economics New Status Quo • Change the status quo 1. Educate our engineers to not rely on the potentially misleading information determined by local 1st law analyses 2. Encourage broad 1st law analyses as well as 2nd law and economic analyses 3. Capitalize on energy efficiency opportunities previously hidden by local 1st law analyses such as PRV parallel/CHP Questions? Thank you for your interest! Want to learn more? Come see us at booth #22 Joshua A. Tolbert, Ph.D. [email protected] 205-300-5114 Practical Steam Contact Info: PO Box 99219 Seattle WA 98139 Phone: 206-981-3015 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advanced Organic Vapor Cycles for Improving Thermal Conversion Efficiency in Renewable Energy Systems by Tony Ho a Dissertation
    Advanced Organic Vapor Cycles for Improving Thermal Conversion Efficiency in Renewable Energy Systems By Tony Ho A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering – Mechanical Engineering in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ralph Greif, Co-Chair Professor Samuel S. Mao, Co-Chair Professor Van P. Carey Professor Per F. Peterson Spring 2012 Abstract Advanced Organic Vapor Cycles for Improving Thermal Conversion Efficiency in Renewable Energy Systems by Tony Ho Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering University of California, Berkeley Professor Ralph Greif, Co-Chair Professor Samuel S. Mao, Co-Chair The Organic Flash Cycle (OFC) is proposed as a vapor power cycle that could potentially increase power generation and improve the utilization efficiency of renewable energy and waste heat recovery systems. A brief review of current advanced vapor power cycles including the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), the zeotropic Rankine cycle, the Kalina cycle, the transcritical cycle, and the trilateral flash cycle is presented. The premise and motivation for the OFC concept is that essentially by improving temperature matching to the energy reservoir stream during heat addition to the power cycle, less irreversibilities are generated and more power can be produced from a given finite thermal energy reservoir. In this study, modern equations of state explicit in Helmholtz energy such as the BACKONE equations, multi-parameter Span- Wagner equations, and the equations compiled in NIST REFPROP 8.0 were used to accurately determine thermodynamic property data for the working fluids considered. Though these equations of state tend to be significantly more complex than cubic equations both in form and computational schemes, modern Helmholtz equations provide much higher accuracy in the high pressure regions, liquid regions, and two-phase regions and also can be extended to accurately describe complex polar fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Data
    Thermodynamic Data It is not possible to know the absolute value of U ˆ or H ˆ for a pure substance, but you can determine the change in U ˆ ( U ˆ ) or Hˆ ( Hˆ ) corresponding to a specified change of state (temperature, pressure, and phase). The change is actually often what we want to know. A common practice is to arbitrarily designate a reference state for a substance at which U ˆ and H ˆ are arbitrarily set to be equal to zero, and then tabulate U ˆ and/or H ˆ for the substance relative to the reference state. For example, ˆ CO (g, 0C, 1 atm) CO (g,100C, 1 atm): HCO 2919 J/mol ˆ ˆ reference state HCO HCO 0 2919 J/mol We say: “The specific enthalpy of CO at 100C and 1 atm relative to CO at 0C and 1 atm is 2919 J/mol”. CHEE 221 1 Reference States and State Properties Most (all?) enthalpy tables report the reference states (T, P and State) on which the values of H ˆ are based; however, it is not necessary to know the reference state to calculate H (change in enthalpy) for the transition from one state to another. ˆ ˆ –H from state 1 to state 2 equals H 2 H 1 regardless of the reference state upon which ˆ and ˆ were based H1 H 2 – Caution: If you use different tables, you must make sure they have the same reference state This result is a consequence of the fact that H ˆ (and U ˆ ) are state properties, that is, their values depend only on the state of the species (temperature, pressure, state) and not on how the species reached its state.
    [Show full text]
  • Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service
    I LL INO I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. 0 ~0' / ~ ( ~ 1~CC~& '~f~LW "0~ "N ~ ~- ~N~TV N Q SC 2"' C' ''~~C'~ C" 4 AA.A..~ Ay ~4.A A A'-' 'A ' ~ ' ,~A~A 1 A' 'A": "I ~' ~A 9 ~AA >' 0 -A.'-- ~ A" Z 'A A' * A -A "* K~ A. A' ~. 'A A, ,~, 'U",' 4 *, A' '~'" 'A * JA A' 'A' A A K 'A 'A / A A A' 'A vas,^esta>bflibea~ ~ by ^f'A A' A ,rt~7B A 'A on, investigations~ve~Wg~on.~. A' ~ 'i* *t~.,to studysti~dy~ prob1~m~problems A sS ~4 IOAWeto eadA manu-m&i~n- 'be industrial interests 'A' of theb8tat;' -'$a te' The control of tho Engineering ExperintSerment• 'titionSl i•is is'vested vested 'A UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN No. 57 APRIL 1912 SUPERHEATED STEAM IN LOCOMOTIVE SERVICE (A REVIEW OF PUBLICATION NO. 127 OF THE CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON) BY W. F. M. GOSS DEAN OF THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DIRECTOR OF THE ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION DIRECTOR OF THE SCHOOL OF RAILWAY ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION CONTENTS PAGE I. Introduction-A Summary of Conclusions .......... 3 II. Foreign Practice in the Use of Superheated Steam in Locomotive Service.............. ......... 5 III. Tests to Determine the Value of Superheating in Lo- comotive Service................ .. .. .... 14 IV. Performance of Boiler and Superheater.. ........... 20 V. Performance of the Engine and of the Locomotive as a W hole... ............ .. .. ........ 35 VI. Economy Resulting from the Use of Superheated Steam ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Improve Performance and Efficiency of the Steam Power Plant
    First Scientific Conference on Petroleum Resources and Manufacturing 27-28 October 2010 Brega, Libya Improve Performance and Efficiency of the Steam Power Plant Hesham G. Ibrahim1, Aly Y. Okasha2 and Ahmed G. Elkhalidy3 1Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Misurata University, Al-Khoms City, Libya. Tel.: ++218-338-9965, e-mail: [email protected] 2Environmental Department, Faculty of Science, Misurata University, Al-Khoms City, Libya Tel.:++218-91-344-6102, e-mail: [email protected] 3Life Tech. Company, Manchester City, UK ABSTRACT Power plants generate electrical power by using fuels like coal, oil or natural gas. Fuel burned in the boiler to heats water to generate steam. The steam is then heated to a superheated state in the superheater. This superheated steam is used to rotate the turbine which powers the generator. Electrical energy is generated when the generator windings rotate in a strong magnetic field. After the steam leaves the turbine it is cooled to its liquid state in the condenser. The liquid is pressurized by the pump prior to going back to the boiler. This simple power plant is called (steam power plant). This cycle has a problem represent through a steam leaves the turbine, it is typically wet. The presence of water causes erosion of the turbine blades at high speed, gradually decreasing the life of turbine blades and efficiency of the turbine. That's leading to damage of turbine then shut-off plant. So, a simulation process of steam power plant done using (Hysys v.3.2) to improve the performance of plant also increasing efficiency through prevent erosion occurs and decreasing heat loses by condenser.
    [Show full text]
  • Consider Installing High-Pressure Boilers with Backpressure Turbine-Generators
    Energy Tips – Steam Steam Tip Sheet #22 • September 2004 Industrial Technologies Program Background Consider Installing High-Pressure Boilers with The capital cost of a back- Backpressure Turbine-Generators pressure turbogenerator complete with electrical When specifying a new boiler, consider a high-pressure boiler with a backpressure switchgear varies from steam turbine-generator placed between the boiler and the steam distribution about $700/kW for a small network. A turbine-generator can often produce enough electricity to justify the system (50 kW) to less than capital cost of purchasing the higher-pressure boiler and the turbine-generator. $200/kW for a larger system (>2,000 kW). Installation Since boiler fuel usage per unit of steam production increases with boiler pressure, costs vary depending upon facilities often install boilers that produce steam at the lowest pressure consistent with piping and wiring runs, but end use and distribution requirements. typically average 75% of equipment costs. In the backpressure turbine configuration, the turbine does not consume steam. Instead, it simply reduces the pressure and energy content of steam that is subsequently exhausted into the process header. In essence, the turbo-generator Packaged or “off-the-shelf” serves the same steam function as a pressure-reducing valve (PRV)—it reduces steam backpressure turbogenerators pressure—but uses the pressure drop to produce highly valued electricity in addition are now available in ratings as to the low-pressure steam. Shaft power is produced when a nozzle directs jets of low as 50 kW. Backpressure high-pressure steam against the blades of the turbineʼs rotor. The rotor is attached to a turbogenerators should be shaft that is coupled to an electrical generator.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Study of Flue Gas Flow and Superheating Process in Recovery Boiler Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and 1D-Process Modelling
    An Integrated Study of Flue Gas Flow and Superheating Process in Recovery Boiler using Computational Fluid Dynamics and 1D-Process Modelling Kunal Kumar Andritz Oy, Viljami Maakala Andritz Oy and Ville Vuorinen Aalto University ABSTRACT Superheaters are the last heat exchangers on the steam side in recovery boilers. They are typically made of expensive materials due to the high steam temperature and risks associated with ash-induced corrosion. Therefore, detailed knowledge about the steam properties and material temperature distribution is essential for improving the energy efficiency, cost efficiency and safety of recovery boilers. In this work, for the first time, a comprehensive 1D-process model (1D-PM) for superheated steam cycle is developed and linked with a full-scale 3D CFD (computational fluid dynamics) model of the superheater region flue gas flow. The results indicate that first; the geometries of headers and superheater platens affect platen-wise steam distribution. Second, the CFD solution of the 3D flue gas flow field and platen heat flux distribution coupled with the 1D-PM affect the generated superheated steam properties and material temperature distribution. These new observations clearly demonstrate the value of the present integrated CFD/1D-PM modelling approach. It is advantageous for trouble shooting, optimizing the performance of superheaters and selecting their design margins for the future. The developed integrated modelling approach could also be relevant for other large-scale energy production units such as biomass-fired boilers. 1 INTRODUCTION Recovery boilers are used to combust black liquor for chemical recovery and producing high-pressure superheated steam. The generated steam is utilized for self-sustainable pulp mill operations and electricity generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics
    ME 201 Thermodynamics ME 201 Thermodynamics Old Exam #2 Solutions Directions: Work all three (3) problems. The exam is open notes and open text book. All problems have equal weight. Problem 1 A rigid container holds 3 kg of air initially at 50°C. The air is stirred so that its pressure changes from 500 kPa to 2000 kPa. The heat transfer is 200 kJ. Determine the final temperature, the change in internal energy, and the work. Solution: Using our 1st law template, we carefully read the problem and enter the given information. System Type: Closed (container) Substance Type: Ideal Gas (air) Process Type: Isotropic (rigid) State 1: Fixed State 2: Not fixed Q = 200 kJ Wsh = ??? Wbnd = 0 Conservation of Mass: m1 = m2 Conservation of Energy: m1u2 - u1 = Q - Wsh State 1 State 2 T1 = 50C = 323 K T2 = 1292 K P1 = 500 kPa P2 = 2000 kPa 3 3 v1 = 0.1854 m /kg v2 = 0.1854 m /kg 3 3 V1 = 0.5562 m V2 = 0.5562 m u1 = 230.58 kJ/kg u2 = 1015.6 kJ/kg m1 = 3 kg m2 = 3 kg Bold values are calculated. Italicized values are from tables or ideal gas law. Approach: Use the air tables and ideal gas law to determine the properties for state 1. Use the mass to calculate V1. Use the isotropic condition to fix state 2, then use the tables to determine the properties. Finally, calculate the shaft work from the 1st law. From the air tables we find u1 = 230.58 kJ/kg From the ideal gas law we have RT1 (0.287 )(323) 3 v1 = 0.1854 m /kg P1 (500) 1 ME 201 Thermodynamics Then by definition 3 V1 mv 1 = (3)(0.1854) 0.5562 m Since our process is isotropic 3 V2 = V1 = 0.5562 m and 3 v2 = v1 = 0.1854 m /kg Solving for the state 2 temperature from the ideal gas law P v (2000 )(0.1854 ) T 1 1 = 1292 K 1 R (0.287 ) From the air tables we now find u2 = 1015.6 kJ/kg Solving for the shaft work form the 1st law Wsh = Q - m1 u 2 - u1 200 - (3)(1015.6 - 230.58) - 2155 kJ Problem 2 A desuperheater is an adiabatic mixing tank which produces saturated vapor from a superheated vapor by adding liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • Superheated Steam Temperature and Heat SCIENTIFIC
    Superheated Steam Temperature and Heat SCIENTIFIC Introduction Why is steam a greater skin-burning threat than boiling water? How much energy is contained in steam? This demonstra- tion will dramatically show the energy content of superheated steam. Concepts • Heat energy • Steam • Condensation Materials Water, 150 mL Meker burner Beaker, any size Rubber stopper with hole, #6 Boiling chips, 2 or 3 Sheets of paper, 2 × 2, 2 Crucible tongs Support stand and clamp Copper coil tubing Support ring or adjustable burner support block Erlenmeyer flask, 250-mL Thermometer (optional) Hot plate Towel Match stick Safety Precautions Superheated steam is very hot. Be sure students are not close to the demonstration apparatus and especially not in the “line of fire” of the jet stream. Hot water and steam will spurt out the open end of the copper tubing during the demonstration. Do not point the exhaust end of the copper coil tubing at anybody. Perform this demonstration on a table that is free of any items that should not get wet. Care should be taken when handling the Meker burner while heating the copper coil. Allow the copper tubing to cool completely before touching or disassembling the apparatus. Wear chemical splash goggles, heat-resistant gloves, and a chemical-resistant apron. Please review current Material Safety Data Sheets for additional safety, handling, and disposal information. Preparation (refer to Figure 1) 1. Carefully insert the bent end of the copper tubing into the hole of the #6 rubber stopper so that the end of the tubing is flush with the bottom of the stopper.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dioxide Mixtures As Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: a Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles
    energies Article Carbon Dioxide Mixtures as Working Fluid for High-Temperature Heat Recovery: A Thermodynamic Comparison with Transcritical Organic Rankine Cycles Abubakr Ayub 1 , Costante M. Invernizzi 1,* , Gioele Di Marcoberardino 1 , Paolo Iora 1 and Giampaolo Manzolini 2 1 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (G.D.M.); [email protected] (P.I.) 2 Energy Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-030-3715-569 Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 4 August 2020 Abstract: This study aims to provide a thermodynamic comparison between supercritical CO2 cycles and ORC cycles utilizing flue gases as waste heat source. Moreover, the possibility of using CO2 mixtures as working fluids in transcritical cycles to enhance the performance of the thermodynamic cycle is explored. ORCs operating with pure working fluids show higher cyclic thermal and total efficiencies compared to supercritical CO2 cycles; thus, they represent a better option for high-temperature waste heat recovery provided that the thermal stability at a higher temperature has been assessed. Based on the improved global thermodynamic performance and good thermal stability of R134a, CO2-R134a is investigated as an illustrative, promising working fluid mixture for transcritical power cycles. The results show that a total efficiency of 0.1476 is obtained for the CO2-R134a mixture (0.3 mole fraction of R134a) at a maximum cycle pressure of 200 bars, which is 15.86% higher than the supercritical carbon dioxide cycle efficiency of 0.1274, obtained at the comparatively high maximum pressure of 300 bars.
    [Show full text]
  • Consider Installing High-Pressure Boilers with Backpressure Turbine-Generators, Energy Tips: STEAM, Steam Tip Sheet #22 (Fact Sh
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING OFFICE Energy Tips: STEAM Steam Tip Sheet #22 Consider Installing High-Pressure Boilers with Backpressure Turbine-Generators Suggested Actions Consider installing a high-pressure When specifying a new boiler, consider a high-pressure boiler with a backpressure boiler with a back-pressure turbine- steam turbine-generator placed between the boiler and the steam distribution network. generator whenever undertaking a A turbine-generator can often produce enough electricity to justify the capital cost of boiler upgrade. When evaluating purchasing the higher-pressure boiler and the turbine-generator. this opportunity, you should: Since boiler fuel usage per unit of steam production increases with boiler pressure, facilities often install boilers that produce steam at the lowest pressure consistent with ■■ Determine how much steam end use and distribution requirements. enthalpy, pressure, and In the backpressure turbine configuration, the turbine does not consume steam. Instead, it temperature are required at the simply reduces the pressure and energy content of steam that is subsequently exhausted header downstream from your into the process header. In essence, the turbogenerator serves the same steam function as boiler. a pressure-reducing valve (PRV)—it reduces steam pressure—but uses the pressure drop to produce highly valued electricity in addition to the low-pressure steam. Shaft power ■■ Calculate the incremental fuel is produced when a nozzle directs jets of high-pressure steam against the blades of the cost between a low-pressure turbine’s rotor. The rotor is attached to a shaft that is coupled to an electrical generator. boiler and a high-pressure boiler. Background ■■ Develop steam flow/duration The capital cost of a back-pressure turbogenerator complete with electrical switchgear curves for your boiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Effective and Green Drying Technologies with Industrial Applications , Chemical Engineering Transactions, 70, 145-150 DOI:10.3303/CET1870025 146
    145 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 70, 2018 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Timothy G. Walmsley, Petar S. Varbanov, Rongxin Su, Jiří J. Klemeš Copyright © 2018, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. ISBN 978-88-95608-67-9; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1870025 Energy Effective and Green Drying Technologies with Industrial Applications Odilio Alves-Filho Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Kolbjørn Hejes vei 1b, 7491 Trondheim, Norway [email protected] Heat pump drying is a green technology with zero global warming potential and zero ozone depletion potential when operating with natural fluids. A well designed heat pump dryer can be several times more energy efficient and less costly than conventional dryers. This dryer beneficially contributes to a sustainable society while providing superior products at competitive cost. It is an advanced engineered drying technology ready for implementation by modern industries wishing a return of investment while contributing to a sustainable society. This paper covers the advances in heat pump and superheated steam drying technologies. These drying processes are in the category of green technologies because they are highly effective and advantageous for the environment and climate change. Descriptions and layouts are given covering design of heat pump and steam dryers. Details are provided in their beneficial operation in single and multistage with vapor compression and drying chambers placed in series. The drying modes covered are atmospheric sublimation and evaporation for improved capacity and superior characteristics of dried materials. The future trend is heat pump drying with natural fluids and superheated steam drying complying with proper industrial practice and with regulations reducing damage to sea, soil and water as well as zeroing contribution to global warming and to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments with Superheated Steam
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY mi wWm m I Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/experimentswithsOOholl EXPERIMENTS WITH SUPERHEATED STEAM BY Charles Ludwig Holl THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESENTED JUNE, 1906 H UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS June , 1 190 G THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY CHARLES LUDWIG HOLL entitled EXPERIMENTS WITH SUPERHEATED STEAM IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering head of department of Mechanical Engineering UKX . CONTENTS Page . Superheated Steam 1 History and Early Application Teste with Superheated Steam on Steam Engines 6 Tests with Superheated Steam on Steam Turbines Reasons for Gain by Superheating 32 Test upon an Engine at the Meoh. Eng. Lab., Univ. of 111.. 34 Conclusions 39 . » SUPERHEATED STEAM Superheatod steam is steam at any pressure at a temperature, higher than the temperature of its evaporation frera water at that pressure. Saturated steam may be superheated by imparting addition- al heat to it at a constant pressure during which process its vol- ume increases. Steam cannot be superheated in the presence of the water from which it was evaporated, owing to the fact that the wat- er takes up the heat and evaporates into further saturated steam. The four principal methods of superheating steam to-day are, first, heating by a furnace, independent of the boiler furnace: second, heating by the hot gases passing from the boiler furnace to the chimney: third, heating by the hot gases before these have ceased to act on the boiler; and fourth, by a fluid which is it- self heated by the hot gases to a higher temperature than the re- quired temperature of the superheated steam HISTORY AND EARLY APPLICATION.
    [Show full text]