DOCSLIB.ORG

0 Exam: 01 Aerodynamics: Boundary Layer Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0 Exam: 01 Aerodynamics: Boundary Layer Theory Aerodynamics EETAC Final Exams Compilation Perm: 0 Exam: 01 Aerodynamics: Boundary Layer Theory { Multiple Choice Test 2018/19 Q2 7. The boundary layer (BL) integral equations... 1. Under which circumstances may the volume rate-of-change (a) result from integrating the BL local equations in the entail viscous shear stresses? wall-normal coordinate over the BL thickness. (b) result from integrating the BL local equations along (a) Never for incompressible flow. the streamwise coordinate. (b) Always under the Stokes hypothesis. (c) result in as many unknowns as there are equations. (c) Always. (d) differ for laminar and turbulent BLs. (d) Never. (e) None of the other options. (e) None of the other options. 8. How is the D'Alembert's paradox removed and the form 2. What is true about the viscous blockage? drag obtained in an inviscid flow { boundary layer coupling (a) All options are correct. calculation? (b) It corresponds to a massflow reduction in the near-wall (a) By solving the inviscid problem for a second time over region due to the effects of viscosity. a body enlarged by the displacement thickness and (c) It corresponds to a momentum flux reduction in the extended with the wake. near-wall region due to the effects of viscosity. (b) By directly solving the boundary layer equations. (d) It follows from the no-slip condition at the wall due to (c) The paradox remains no matter what. viscous effects. (d) By solving the inviscid problem over the original body. (e) It may be quantified by the displacement and momen- (e) The paradox was never there in the first place. tum thicknesses of the boundary layer. 9. Which of the following inviscid potential flows admit self- 3. Which of the following factors may be held responsible similar solutions for the two-dimensional incompressible for both advancing turbulent transition and inducing early laminar boundary layer equations? separation of a boundary layer? (a) Wedge/corner flows. (a) An adverse pressure gradient. (b) Source and sink flows. (b) Wall roughness. (c) Irrotational vortex flow. (c) High preturbulence levels in the outer flow. (d) Doublet flow. (d) High Reynolds number. (e) None of the other options. (e) None of the other options. 10. For the laminar boundary layer developing in the vicinity 4. Laminar boundary layers, as opposed to turbulent,... of a stagnation point... (a) have lower friction but separate earlier. (a) momentum thickness is locally finite and constant. (b) have lower friction and separate later. (b) displacement thickness grows linearly. (c) have higher friction and separate earlier. (c) wall shear stress is locally finite and constant. (d) have higher friction but separate later. (d) the form factor is larger than for the Blasius solution. (e) None of the other options. (e) None of the other options. 5. Which of the following properties of the Navier-Stokes 11. Which of the following statements does NOT describe tur- equations do the Euler equations retain? bulent flows? (a) None of the other options. (a) Low energy dissipation. (b) The no-slip condition can be applied on all solid walls. (b) Intrinsic three-dimensionality. (c) They allow computation of friction drag. (c) Intrinsically time-dependence. (d) They allow computation of form drag of closed bodies. (d) Deterministic chaos. (e) They can anticipate the occurrence of turbulence and (e) Enhanced mixing capabilities. wakes. 12. Which of the following methods for solving turbulent flows 6. Which of the following terms of the streamwise momentum simulates the large turbulent structures but filters out (and equation drops under the boundary layer hypothesis? then models) the smaller scales? (a) Streamwise diffusion. (a) Large Eddy Simulation (LES) (b) Wall-normal diffusion. (b) Reynolds Averaged Navier-Sokes (RANS). (c) Streamwise advection. (c) Direct Navier-Stokes (DNS). (d) Wall-normal advection. (d) Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). (e) Streamwise pressure gradient. (e) None of the others. 0 0 13. What is the actual origin of the Reynolds stresses (−ρuiuj ) 19. On a finite wing producing lift... in the RANS equations? (a) None of the other options are correct. (a) Advective momentum transport due to turbulent fluc- (b) Wingtip vortices roll from suction to pressure side. tuations. (c) The lift distribution is homogeneous along the span. (b) Diffusive momentum transport due to enhanced fluid (d) There may still be no lift-induced drag. viscosity. (e) Streamlines are deflected towards the fuselage on the (c) Turbulent pressure fluctuations. pressure side and towards wingtip on the suction side. (d) Mass conservation in the presence of turbulent fluctu- 20. Prandtl's lifting-line theory for finite wings... ations. (e) None of the other options. (a) All options are correct. (b) leads to an integro-differential equation for the circu- 14. How do viscous µ @u and Reynolds −ρu0v0 shear stresses @y lation distribution along the span. compare within an incompressible, statistically two- dimensional, turbulent boundary layer (TBL)? (c) shows that minimum lift-induced drag is obtained for an elliptical distribution of circulation along the span. (a) µ @u prevails in the immediate vicinity of the wall. @y (d) is based on assessing the span-dependent effective an- (b) −ρu0v0 prevails over the full TBL thickness. gle of attack that results from wingtip vortices. @u (c) µ @y prevails over the full TBL thickness. (e) provides both wing global lift and lift-induced drag (d) −ρu0v0 prevails in the immediate vicinity of the wall. coefficients. (e) They compete in size over the full TBL thickness. 2018/19 Q1 15. What is the sign of the streamwise-wall-normal velocity 21. Into which terms may the total rate-of-change of a small fluctuation correlations (u0v0) within a turbulent boundary fluid volume be split, provided nonlinear effects are ne- layer? glected? (a) u0v0 < 0. (a) Translation, rotation, volume change, shear deforma- 0 0 (b) u v > 0. tion. 0 0 (c) u v = 0. (b) Translation, rotation, volume change. 0 0 0 0 (d) u v < 0 close to the wall and u v > 0 far from it. (c) Translation, rotation, shear deformation. 0 0 0 0 (e) u v > 0 close to the wall and u v < 0 far from it. (d) Rotation, volume change, shear deformation. 16. How can lift be estimated for an airfoil immersed in invis- (e) Volume change, shear deformation. cid incompressible flow? 22. Why is the drag on a sphere smaller when the separating (a) By introducing a circulation to enforce the Kutta con- boundary layer is turbulent rather than laminar? dition. (a) Because wake drag dominates and is smaller. (b) In no way because potential flow is irrotational. (b) Because friction drag dominates and is smaller. (c) Enforcing wall impermeability, lift naturally arises. (c) Because both wake and friction drag are smaller. (d) By enforcing the no-slip condition on the walls to the (d) Because wake drag is zero. potential flow equations. (e) The assertion is plain wrong. The opposite is true. (e) None of the other options. 23. What is true about the streamwise evolution of a boundary 17. Which statement is true about the lifting problem within layer (possibly involving a turbulent transition) developing the frame of linear potential theory? on a flat plate? (a) The perturbation potential is anti-symmetric in the (a) Its momentum thickness grows monotonically. vertical coordinate. (b) Its friction coefficient decreases monotonically. (b) The vertical perturbation velocity is anti-symmetric in the vertical coordinate. (c) Its momentum thickness decreases monotonically. (c) The horizontal perturbation velocity is symmetric in (d) Its friction coefficient increases monotonically. the vertical coordinate. (e) None of the other options. (d) Both the vertical and horizontal perturbation veloci- 24. Which statement is correct under the boundary layer hy- ties are symmetric in the vertical coordinate. pothesis? (e) None of the other options are correct. (a) None of the other options. 18. A problem that aims at computing the pressure distribu- (b) Streamwise diffusion outweighs streamwise advection. tion given the airfoil shape is known as... (c) Streamwise diffusion outweighs wall-normal diffusion. (a) a direct problem. (d) Wall-normal pressure gradients are large. (b) an inverse problem. (e) Fluid particles slip at the wall. (c) a symmetric problem. (d) an anti-symmetric problem. (e) None of the other options are correct. 25. Which of the following interpretations of the displacement 31. What does viscosity depend on for Newtonian fluids such thickness is plain FALSE? as water or air? (a) It quantifies the friction drag coefficient to be ex- (a) Temperature. pected. (b) Shear deformation rate. (b) It quantifies the deviation of streamlines outside of the (c) Both temperature and shear deformation rate. boundary layer. (d) Neither temperature nor shear deformation rate. (c) It quantifies the massflow blockage due to viscous ef- (e) Reynolds number. fects. 32. Which of the following conditions entails separation of a (d) It quantifies the amount of wall-normal momentum two-dimensional flow? that must appear for mass preservation within the boundary layer. (a) Zero wall friction. (e) All statements are TRUE. (b) Zero wall velocity. 26. Which of the following boundary layers is at a higher risk (c) Infinite wall-normal gradient of streamwise velocity. of separation, all other parameters unaltered? (d) Zero boundary layer momentum thickness. (a) One that has a larger thickness. (e) Zero boundary layer form factor. (b) One that has a larger outer velocity. 33. Which momentum transport mechanisms are mainly com- (c) One that is subject to a stronger negative (favorable) peting within a laminar boundary layer? pressure gradient. (a) Streamwise advection and wall-normal diffusion. (d) One that is turbulent. (b) Streamwise diffusion and wall-normal advection. (e) One that is subject to a milder deceleration of the (c) Streamwise diffusion and streamwise advection.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Numerical Comparison of Symmetric and Asymmetric Supersonic Wind Tunnels
    A Numerical Comparison of Symmetric and Asymmetric Supersonic Wind Tunnels by Kylen D. Clark B.S., University of Toledo, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics of the College of Engineering and Applied Science Committee Chair: Paul D. Orkwis Date: October 21, 2015 Abstract Supersonic wind tunnels are a vital aspect to the aerospace industry. Both the design and testing processes of different aerospace components often include and depend upon utilization of supersonic test facilities. Engine inlets, wing shapes, and body aerodynamics, to name a few, are aspects of aircraft that are frequently subjected to supersonic conditions in use, and thus often require supersonic wind tunnel testing. There is a need for reliable and repeatable supersonic test facilities in order to help create these vital components. The option of building and using asymmetric supersonic converging-diverging nozzles may be appealing due in part to lower construction costs. There is a need, however, to investigate the differences, if any, in the flow characteristics and performance of asymmetric type supersonic wind tunnels in comparison to symmetric due to the fact that asymmetric configurations of CD nozzle are not as common. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study has been conducted on an existing University of Michigan (UM) asymmetric supersonic wind tunnel geometry in order to study the effects of asymmetry on supersonic wind tunnel performance. Simulations were made on both the existing asymmetrical tunnel geometry and two axisymmetric reflections (of differing aspect ratio) of that original tunnel geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Study on Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flows with Wall
    Experimental study on turbulent boundary-layer flows with wall transpiration by Marco Ferro October 2017 Technical Reports Royal Institute of Technology Department of Mechanics SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Akademisk avhandling som med tillst˚andav Kungliga Tekniska H¨ogskolan i Stockholm framl¨agges till offentlig granskning f¨or avl¨aggande av teknologie doktorsexamen fredag den 24 November 2017 kl 10:15 i Kollegiesalen, Kungliga Tekniska H¨ogskolan, Brinellv¨agen 8, Stockholm. TRITA-MEK 2017:13 ISSN 0348-467X ISRN KTH/MEK/TR-17/13-SE ISBN 978-91-7729-556-3 c Marco Ferro 2017 Universitetsservice US{AB, Stockholm 2017 Experimental study on turbulent boundary-layer flows with wall transpiration Marco Ferro Linn´eFLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract Wall transpiration, in the form of wall-normal suction or blowing through a permeable wall, is a relatively simple and effective technique to control the be- haviour of a boundary layer. For its potential applications for laminar-turbulent transition and separation delay (suction) or for turbulent drag reduction and thermal protection (blowing), wall transpiration has over the past decades been the topic of a significant amount of studies. However, as far as the turbulent regime is concerned, fundamental understanding of the phenomena occurring in the boundary layer in presence of wall transpiration is limited and consid- erable disagreements persist even on the description of basic quantities, such as the mean streamwise velocity, for the rather simplified case of flat-plate boundary-layer flows without pressure gradients. In order to provide new experimental data on suction and blowing boundary layers, an experimental apparatus was designed and brought into operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wall Roughness on Adverse Pressure Gradient Boundary Layers
    Effects of Wall Roughness on Adverse Pressure Gradient Boundary Layers by Pouya Mottaghian A thesis submitted to the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada December, 2015 Copyright © Pouya Mottaghian, 2015 Abstract Large-eddy Simulations were carried out on a at-plate boundary layer over smooth and rough surfaces in the presence of an adverse pressure gradient, strong enough to induce separation. The inlet Reynolds number (based on freestream velocity and momentum thick- ness at the reference plane) is 2300. A sand-grain roughness model was implemented and spatial-resolution requirements were determined. Two roughness heights were used and a fully-rough ow condition is achieved at the refer- ence plane with roughness Reynolds numbers 60 and 120. As the friction velocity decreases due to the adverse pressure gradient the roughness Reynolds number varies from fully-rough to transitionally rough and smooth regime before the separation. The double-averaging approach illustrates how the roughness contribution decreases before the separation as the dispersive stresses decrease markedly compared to the upstream region. Before the ow detachment, roughness intensies the Reynolds stresses. After the sep- aration, the normal stresses, production and dissipation substantially increase through the adverse pressure gradient region. In the recovery region, the ow is highly three dimensional, as turbulent structures impinge on the wall at the reattachment region. Roughness initially increases the skin friction, then causes it to decrease faster than on a smooth wall, generating a considerably larger recirculation bubble for rough cases with earlier separation and later reattachment; increasing the wall roughness also leads to larger separation bubble.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 FLUID MECHANICS TUTORIAL No. 3 BOUNDARY LAYER THEORY In
    FLUID MECHANICS TUTORIAL No. 3 BOUNDARY LAYER THEORY In order to complete this tutorial you should already have completed tutorial 1 and 2 in this series. This tutorial examines boundary layer theory in some depth. When you have completed this tutorial, you should be able to do the following. Discuss the drag on bluff objects including long cylinders and spheres. Explain skin drag and form drag. Discuss the formation of wakes. Explain the concept of momentum thickness and displacement thickness. Solve problems involving laminar and turbulent boundary layers. Throughout there are worked examples, assignments and typical exam questions. You should complete each assignment in order so that you progress from one level of knowledge to another. Let us start by examining how drag is created on objects. 1 1. DRAG When a fluid flows around the outside of a body, it produces a force that tends to drag the body in the direction of the flow. The drag acting on a moving object such as a ship or an aeroplane must be overcome by the propulsion system. Drag takes two forms, skin friction drag and form drag. 1.1 SKIN FRICTION DRAG Skin friction drag is due to the viscous shearing that takes place between the surface and the layer of fluid immediately above it. This occurs on surfaces of objects that are long in the direction of flow compared to their height. Such bodies are called STREAMLINED. When a fluid flows over a solid surface, the layer next to the surface may become attached to it (it wets the surface).
    [Show full text]
  • Incompressible Skewed Turbulent Boundary Layer on an End Wall of a Curved Two-Dimensional Diffuser Marvin Dale Smith Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1970 Incompressible skewed turbulent boundary layer on an end wall of a curved two-dimensional diffuser Marvin Dale Smith Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Marvin Dale, "Incompressible skewed turbulent boundary layer on an end wall of a curved two-dimensional diffuser " (1970). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4199. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4199 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 70-18,908 SMITH, Marvin Dale, 1935- INCOMPRESSIBLE SKEWED TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER ON AN END WALL OF A C'JRVSD TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFUSER. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1970 Engineering, mechanical I University Microfilms, A XEROXCompany, Ann Arbor, Michigan j. : Art T»T^oT^xtrr»T\ INCOMPRESSIBLE SKEWED TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER ON AN END WALL OF A CURVED TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFUSER by Marvin Dale Smith A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of Tlie Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subjects; Mechanical Engineering Aerospace Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Investigation of the Turbulent Wake-Boundary Interaction in a Translational Cascade of Airfoils and Flat Plate
    energies Article Numerical Investigation of the Turbulent Wake-Boundary Interaction in a Translational Cascade of Airfoils and Flat Plate Xiaodong Ruan 1,*, Xu Zhang 1, Pengfei Wang 2 , Jiaming Wang 1 and Zhongbin Xu 3 1 State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; [email protected] (X.Z.); [email protected] (J.W.) 2 School of Engineering, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China; [email protected] 3 Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-1385-805-3612 Received: 24 July 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020; Published: 31 August 2020 Abstract: Rotor stator interaction (RSI) is an important phenomenon influencing performances in the pump, turbine, and compressor. In this paper, the correlation-based transition model is used to study the RSI phenomenon between a translational cascade of airfoils and a flat plat. A comparison was made between computational results and experimental results. The computational boundary layer velocity is in reasonable agreement with the experimental velocity. The thickness of boundary layer decreases as the RSI frequency increases and it increases as the fluid flows downstream. The spectral plots of velocity fluctuations at leading edge x/c = 2 under RSI partial flow condition f = 20 Hz and f = 30 Hz are dominated by a narrowband component. RSI frequency mainly affects the turbulence intensity in the freestream region. However, it has little influence on the turbulence intensity of boundary layer near the wall. A secondary vortex is induced by the wake–boundary layer interaction and it leads to the formation of a thickened laminar boundary layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Boundary Layers Through Computational Fluid Dynamics and Experimental Analysis
    Analysis of Boundary Layers through Computational Fluid Dynamics and Experimental analysis By Eugene O’Reilly, B.Eng This thesis is submitted as the fulfilment of the requirement for the award of degree of Master of Engineering Supervisors Dr Joseph Stokes and Dr Brian Corcoran School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Dublin City University, Ireland. October 2006 DECLARATION I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Degree of Master of Engineering is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my own work Signed ID Number 99604434 Date 2&j \Oj 2QOG I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr Joseph Stokes and Dr Brian Corcoran of the School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Dublin City University, for their advice and guidance through this work Their helpful discussions and availability to discuss any problems I was having has been the cornerstone of this research Thanks also, to Mr Michael May of the School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering for his invaluable help and guidance in the design and construction of the experimental equipment To Mr Cian Meme and Mr Eoin Tuohy of the workshop for their technical advice and excellent work in the production of the required parts and to Mr Keith Hickey for his help with all my software queries and computer issues Thanks also to Mr Ben Austin and Mr David Cunningham of the School
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Prandtl and Boundary Layers in Fluid Flow How a Small Viscosity Can Cause Large Effects
    GENERAL I ARTICLE Ludwig Prandtl and Boundary Layers in Fluid Flow How a Small Viscosity can Cause large Effects Jaywant H Arakeri and P N Shankar In 1904, Prandtl proposed the concept of bound­ ary layers that revolutionised the study of fluid mechanics. In this article we present the basic ideas of boundary layers and boundary-layer sep­ aration, a phenomenon that distinguishes stream­ lined from bluff bodies. Jaywant Arakeri is in the Mechanical Engineering A Long-Standing Paradox Department and in the Centre for Product It is a matter of common experience that when we stand Development and in a breeze or wade in water we feel a force which is Manufacture at the Indian called the drag force. We now know that the drag is Institute of Science, caused by fluid friction or viscosity. However, for long it Bangalore. His research is was believed that the viscosity shouldn't enter the pic­ mainly in instability and turbulence in fluid motion. ture at all since it was so small in value for both water He is also interested in and air. Assuming no viscosity, the finest mathematical issues related to environ­ physicists of the 19th century constructed a large body ment and development. of elegant results which predicted that the drag on a body in steady flow would be zero. This discrepancy between ideal fluid theory or hydrodynamics and com­ mon experience was known as 'd' Alembert's paradox' The paradox was only resolved in a revolutionary 1904 paper by L Prandtl who showed that viscous effects, no matter how'small the viscosity, can never be neglected.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Wall Turbulence. Boundary-Layer Flows
    Ch 9. Wall Turbulence; Boundary-Layer Flows Chapter 9 Wall Turbulence. Boundary-Layer Flows 9.1 Introduction • Turbulence occurs most commonly in shear flows. • Shear flow: spatial variation of the mean velocity 1) wall turbulence: along solid surface → no-slip condition at surface 2) free turbulence: at the interface between fluid zones having different velocities, and at boundaries of a jet → jet, wakes • Turbulent motion in shear flows - self-sustaining - Turbulence arises as a consequence of the shear. - Shear persists as a consequence of the turbulent fluctuations. → Turbulence can neither arise nor persist without shear. 9.2 Structure of a Turbulent Boundary Layer 9.2.1 Boundary layer flows (i) Smooth boundary Consider a fluid stream flowing past a smooth boundary. → A boundary-layer zone of viscous influence is developed near the boundary. 1) Re Recrit → The boundary-layer is initially laminar. u u() y 9-1 Ch 9. Wall Turbulence; Boundary-Layer Flows 2) Re Recrit → The boundary-layer is turbulent. u u() y → Turbulence reaches out into the free stream to entrain and mix more fluid. → thicker boundary layer: turb 4 lam External flow Turbulent boundary layer xx crit , total friction = laminar xx crit , total friction = laminar + turbulent 9-2 Ch 9. Wall Turbulence; Boundary-Layer Flows (ii) Rough boundary → Turbulent boundary layer is established near the leading edge of the boundary without a preceding stretch of laminar flow. Turbulent boundary layer Laminar sublayer 9.2.2 Comparison of laminar and turbulent boundary-layer profiles For the flows of the same Reynolds number (Rex 500,000) Ux Re x 9-3 Ch 9.
    [Show full text]
  • BOUNDARY LAYER CONCEPT in the STUDY of FLUID FLOW When Fluids Flow Over Surfaces, the Molecules Near the Surface Are Brought to Rest Due to the Viscosity of the Fluid
    BOUNDARY LAYER CONCEPT IN THE STUDY OF FLUID FLOW When fluids flow over surfaces, the molecules near the surface are brought to rest due to the viscosity of the fluid. The adjacent layers are also slow down, but to a lower and lower extent. This slowing down is found limited to a thin layer near the surface. The fluid beyond this layer is not affected by the presence of the surface. The fluid layer near the surface in which there is a general slowing down is defined as boundary layer. The velocity of flow in this layer increases from zero at the surface to free stream velocity at the edge of the boundary layer. When a real fluid flow past a solid body or a solid wall, the fluid particles adhere to the boundary and condition of no slip occurs. This means that the velocity of fluid close to the boundary will be same as that of the boundary. If the boundary is stationary, the velocity of fluid at the boundary will be zero. The theory dealing with boundary layer flows is called boundary layer theory. According to the B.L. theory, the flow of fluid in the neighbourhood of the solid boundary may be divided into two regions as shown below Description of the Boundary Layer The simplest boundary layer to study is that formed in the flow along one side of a thin, smooth, flat plate parallel to the direction of the oncoming fluid. No other solid surface is near, and the pressure of the fluid is uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Investigation of the Boundary Layer Transition on a Laminar Airfoil Using Infrared Thermography
    EPJ Web of Conferences 180, 02040 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818002040 EFM 2017 Experimental Investigation of the Boundary Layer Transition on a Laminar Airfoil Using Infrared Thermography Tomáš Jelínek1,* 1VZLU – Czech Aerospace Research Centre, Beranových 130, 199 05 Prague, Czechia Abstract: The transition in the boundary layer is investigated using infrared thermography (IRT). The study is carried out on a laminar airfoil in the transonic intermittent in-draft wind tunnel. The transition in the boundary layer is evocated using transition-generator strips of different thicknesses at two Mach numbers: 0.4 and 0.8. The tested transition-generators thickness to boundary layer displacement thickness ratio was from 0.42 to 1.25. The Reynolds number respect to the airfoil chord is: Re = 1.0 – 1.4106. The six cases for different transition-generators thickness ratios were compared. The behaviours of laminar and turbulent boundary layers are discussed. The use of IRT has been proven to be an appropriate tool for detecting the transition of the boundary layer in high-speed wind tunnel testing. 1 Introduction sensors that always have the final dimensions, and so the nature of the boundary layer can be significantly To study the development of the boundary layer and the affected. In these cases, it is appropriate to use a method transition from the laminar to the turbulent flow in the that would detect the transition in the boundary layer boundary layer is very important because it without having to change the surface of the examined fundamentally changes the character of the boundary model.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRFOIL BOUNDARY LAYER CALCULATIONS USING N INTERACTIVE METHOD and E TRANSITION PREDICTION TECHNIQUE
    AIRFOIL BOUNDARY LAYER CALCULATIONS USING n INTERACTIVE METHOD AND e TRANSITION PREDICTION TECHNIQUE MEHMET MERSİNLİGİL SEPTEMBER 2006 AIRFOIL BOUNDARY LAYER CALCULATIONS USING n INTERACTIVE METHOD AND e TRANSITION PREDICTION TECHNIQUE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MEHMET MERSİNLİGİL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AEROSPACE ENGINEERING SEPTEMBER 2006 Approval of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences ________________________ Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science ________________________ Prof. Dr. Nafiz Alemdaroğlu Head of the Department We certify that we have read this thesis and in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering. ________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Supervisor Prof. Dr. Nafiz Alemdaroğlu METU, AE ________________________ Prof. Dr. Zafer Dursunkaya METU, ME ________________________ Prof. Dr. Yusuf Özyörük METU, AE ________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen METU, AE ________________________ Dr. Oğuz Uzol METU, AE ________________________ PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Mehmet Mersinligil iii ABSTRACT AIRFOIL BOUNDARY LAYER CALCULATIONS USING n INTERACTIVE METHOD AND e TRANSITION PREDICTION TECHNIQUE MERSİNLİGİL, Mehmet M.S., Department of Aerospace Engineering Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]