DOCSLIB.ORG

EL.TECH-ANEMOS-Prese

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EL.TECH-ANEMOS-Prese Company presentation June 2018 Disclaimer This presentation contains forward-looking statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan“, “target”, “aim”, “will”, “may”, “would”, “could” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this presentation including, without limitation, those regarding the Group’s financial position, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations (including development plans and objectives related to the Group’s products), are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Group’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding the Group’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Group will operate in the future. Furthermore, certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions or future events which may not prove to be accurate. The forward-looking statements in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation. This presentation contains market share data based on internal management as no reliable market share data is currently available from third party sources. Public information varies on definitions of segmentation and the Group may define certain product segments differently than its competitors, which may result in a different interpretation of the same information by different market participants. If a third party were to evaluate the relevant market share data in any jurisdiction in which the Group operates it may result in a different conclusion to those presented by management herein. No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information or the opinions contained herein. The information in this presentation has not been independently verified. Information other than indicative terms (including market data and statistical information) has been obtained from various sources. All projections, valuations and statistical analyses are provided to assist the recipient in the evaluation of matters described herein. They may be based on subjective assessments and assumptions and may use one among alternative methodologies that produce different results and to the extent they are based on historical information, they should not be relied upon as an accurate prediction of future performance and the Group expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Group’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based. Neither the Group, nor any of its agents, employees or advisors intends or has any duty or obligation to supplement, amend, update or revise any of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. None of the Group or any of its affiliates or representatives, their respective advisers, connected persons or any other person accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from this presentation or its contents. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. 1 Company overview 2nd largest electricity producer from Renewable Energy Sources (“RES”) in Greece EL.TECH. ANEMOS’ relative share in Greek wind energy market FY17 revenue: 96.8% wind, 2.5% hydro, 0.7% photovoltaic 12% 5.4 yrs weighted average wind turbine fleet age(1), 19.5 yrs remaining PPA duration(1) Market Capitalisation of EUR157m(1) 10% 9,7% nd 9,2% 9,1% 2 largest RES energy producer in Greece in terms of installed capacity 8,5% 8,6% 8,8% Total RES installed capacity of 289 MW and 172 MW under construction 8% with a target to reach 490 MW by 2020 7,2% 6,6% Member of the ELLAKTOR Group 6% EUR m 4,8% 60 53,5 100% 49,7 95% 40.1 50 45,2 90% 40,1 36.9 4% 37,2 85% 40 31.7 31,6 31,3 31.6 33,4 80% 2,8% 28,1 2,4% 30 75% 20,9 70% 2% 20 40.1 65% 60% 10 31.7 31.6 55% 36.9 0 50% 0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTM 31.03.18 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Revenue (lha) EBITDA (lha) EBITDA margin (rha) Source: HWEA (Greek wind market data) & ANEMOS Management Notes: (1) As of May 31, 2018 2 EL.TECH. ANEMOS history in brief Operating capacity reaches 289MW with additional 201MW Operating capacity grows further to under construction & ready for 171MW, including the first and only construction small hydroelectric power plant (5ΜW) Operating capacity increases to 55MW through organic growth, acquisition of 2020 licenses & installation of several wind farms. 06/2018 Following a series of share capital increases, 2014 the pre-IPO (2014) shareholding structure is 2011 formulated to 2013 2010 2004 to 2009 Wind projects in early development are Target added to its portfolio 2003 Listing of the Company on 490 MW the Athens Stock Exchange (IPO) Operating capacity reaches 87MW with the construction of additional wind 2002 farm. EL.TECH. ANEMOS’ first and only PV park of 2ΜW capacity is granted its operation license 2001 First 9MW wind parks are commissioned on Lesvos island EL.TECH. ANEMOS’ founding shareholders enter the RES market Source: EL.TECH. ANEMOS Management 3 High quality asset base Setup Operations(1) Track Record Construction Capacity Factors (%) 45% 40% 2015 2016 2017 LTM 31.03.18 Typically 12-24 35% months to build, 30% blue-chip 25% turbine 20% manufacturers 15% 10% 5% 0% Annual weighted average 26.7% 27.0% 25.3% 27.0% Capacity Factors (annual weighted average) – EL.TECH. ANEMOS vs Greece 30% Land is either owned or 19.5 years remaining 28% leased for the duration duration of PPA 26% of Production License Agreements between 24% validity (25 years) EL.TECH. ANEMOS and 22% LAGIE/DEDDIE for Generally extendable 20% operating projects 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTM for an additional equal 31.03.18 Source: LAGIE/DEDDIE period 277 MW under FiT EL.TECH. ANEMOS Greece regime and 213 MW under revised sFiP Stable historical power generation Weighted average Capacity factors typically higher than the Greek market average operating wind turbine Very high average availability 98.5% (2010-LTM 31.03.18) age of 5.4 years Notes: Source: EL.TECH. ANEMOS Management (1) Numbers as of 31.05.18 4 Development of EL.TECH. ANEMOS’ installed capacity Average (2010 – LTM 31.03.18) Revenues/MW (€k) 216 Capacity Factor 26.4% EBITDA/MW (€k) 143 Availability 98.5% EBITDA Margin 68.4% EBITDA (€m) 490 50 500 45 450 40 400 35 350 30 300 25 250 20 200 15 150 10 100 5 50 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTM 2020 31.03.18 Mean annual capacity (MW installed) EBITDA €m Source: EL.TECH. ANEMOS Management 5 Performance track record Steadily growing by implementing our pipeline LTM 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 31.03.18 Revenues/MW (€k) 232 215 229 228 185 213 218 202 214 EBITDA/MW (€k) 159 140 149 137 122 149 151 136 148 EBITDA Margin 68.5% 65.3% 65.0% 60.0% 66.1% 70.1% 69.2% 67.2% 69.4% Capacity Factor 27.8% 26.7% 27.4% 27.1% 22.9% 26.7% 27.0% 25.3% 27.0% Availability 98.8% 98.9% 98.5% 98.4% 98.5% 97.6% 98.3% 98.6% 98.2% MW 500 490 450 400 350 289 300 260 241 250 208 208 171 171 200 150 150 118 87 100 56 50 24 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 LTM 15.06.18 2020 31.03.18 Target Source: EL.TECH. ANEMOS Management 6 Construction track record Our wealth of experience has allowed us to be consistent in our construction costs and construction duration of c. 12-24 months Historical construction cost per site Historical construction duration per site Average historical fixed wind asset acquisition cost of c. 1.3 Consistently achieved construction within 12-24 months €m/MW, decreasing gradually and already down to c. 1.0 – Wind turbine manufacturers require 6 - 8 months for €m/MW in latest windfarms. Expected to decrease further due to delivery, irrespectively of project scale. growing competition. – For large projects, where substantial works are required (i.e. access roads, substations and/or electrical connection lines), Wind farm construction cost as a function of COD there is a slight increase in execution time. 2,0 – Some projects benefit from existing infrastructure, thus decreasing construction period and cost. Such is the case for 1,8 some pipeline projects: in Kefalonia. 1,6 Infrastructure available for pipeline Additional investments in substations & electrical grid 1,4 infrastructure, available for either future EL.TECH. ANEMOS’ m/MW € projects to connect (at no extra cost) or third parties to connect, 1,2 reimbursing EL.TECH. ANEMOS for CAPEX already incurred: – 300 MW available in 150 kV overhead transmission line in 1,0 Thrace – 89 MW capacity available in existing 150/20 kV substations. 0,8 – 60 MW capacity available at new, under construction 150/20 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 kV substations, expected to be commissioned in 2019. COD: commercial operation date – 150 MW substation extensions capacity at reduced cost. Source: EL.TECH. ANEMOS Management 7 Robust financial performance Revenue EBITDA & EBITDA margin (%) €m €m EBITDA EBITDA margin 37,2 60 53,5 40 100% 33,4 49,7 31,3 50 45,2 28,1 90% 40,1 30 40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS “Archaeological Tourism in Greece
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS (R.N. 1012201502004) DIPLOMA THESIS: “Archaeological tourism in Greece: an analysis of quantitative data, determining factors and prospects” SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikolaos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara - Dr. Nikolaos Platis ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ, MARCH 2017 Abstract . For many decades now, Greece has invested a lot in tourism which can undoubtedly be considered the country’s most valuable asset and “heavy industry”. The country is gifted with a rich and diverse history, represented by a variety of cultural heritage sites which create an ideal setting for this particular type of tourism. Moreover, the variations in Greece’s landscape, cultural tradition and agricultural activity favor the development and promotion of most types of alternative types of tourism, such as agro-tourism, religious, sports and medicinal tourism. However, according to quantitative data from the Hellenic Statistical Authority, despite the large number of visitors recorded in state-run cultural heritage sites every year, the distribution pattern of visitors presents large variations per prefecture. A careful examination of this data shows that tourist flows tend to concentrate in certain prefectures, while others enjoy little to no visitor preference. The main factors behind this phenomenon include the number and importance of cultural heritage sites and the state of local and national infrastructure, which determines the accessibility of sites. An effective analysis of these deficiencies is vital in order to determine solutions in order to encourage the flow of visitors to the more “neglected” areas. The present thesis attempts an in-depth analysis of cultural tourism in Greece and the factors affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • Elephas Antiquus in Greece: New finds and a Reappraisal of Older Material (Mammalia, Proboscidea, Elephantidae)
    Quaternary International xxx (2010) 1e11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Elephas antiquus in Greece: New finds and a reappraisal of older material (Mammalia, Proboscidea, Elephantidae) Evangelia Tsoukala a,*, Dick Mol b, Spyridoula Pappa a, Evangelos Vlachos a, Wilrie van Logchem c, Markos Vaxevanopoulos d, Jelle Reumer e a Aristotle University, School of Geology, University campus, 54 124 Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece b Natural History Museum Rotterdam and Mammuthus Club International, Gudumholm 41, 2133 HG Hoofddorp, The Netherlands c Mammuthus Club International, Bosuilstraat 12, 4105 WE Culemborg, The Netherlands d Ministry of Culture, Ephorate of Palaeoanthropology-Speleology of Northern Greece, Navarinou 28, 55131, Thessaloniki, Greece e Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University and Natural History Museum Rotterdam, PO Box 23452, 3001 KL Rotterdam, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: This paper briefly describes some recently discovered remains of the straight-tusked elephant, Elephas Available online xxx antiquus, from Greece. Material of this extinct proboscidean was found in four localities in Northern Greece: Kaloneri and Sotiras in Western Macedonia, Xerias in Eastern Macedonia, and Larissa in Thessaly. In addition, published elephant remains from Ambelia, Petres and Perdikas, also from Northern Greece, are reinterpreted and also attributed to E. antiquus. Of all these, the Kaloneri elephant shows an inter- esting paleopathology: it was disabled by a broken right tusk. Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction of E. namadicus comes from India. Maglio (1973) considered the Asiatic form E. namadicus to be a senior synonym of the European Fossil Proboscidea are known from Neogene and Quaternary form E.
    [Show full text]
  • GREECE in Gures
    GREECE in gures July - September 2015 ΤΑΤΙΣ Σ Τ Ι Η Κ Κ Η Ι Ν Α Ρ Η Χ Λ Η Λ Ε • www.statistics.gr HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY 1 Foreword FOREWORD The Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) through the new quarterly publication Greece in figures, published in both the Greek and English languages, presents statistical data providing an updated demographic, social and economic picture of Greece in a clear and comprehensive manner. The publication Greece in figures is intended for users of sta - tistics who seek to have a comprehensive view of Greece, on the basis of the most recent statistical data. The statistical time series included in this publication are, mostly, compiled by ELSTAT. Furthermore, for comparability reasons, the pub - lication also presents, by theme, selected tables with statisti - cal data of EU Member States. The publication will be updated with the most recent data on a quarterly basis and will be posted on the portal of ELSTAT on the first Wednesday of January, April, July and Octo - ber . For more information on the data and statistics provided in Greece in figures , please contact the Division of Statistical In - formation and Publications of ELSTAT (tel: +30 213 1352021, +30 213 1352301, e-mail: [email protected]). We welcome any suggestions and recommendations on the content of the publication. Andreas V. Georgiou President of ELSTAT 2 3 Contents CONTENTS Foreword 3 Land and climate 1. Surface area of Greece 11 2. Principal mountains of Greece 11 3. Principal lakes of Greece 11 4. Principal rivers of Greece 12 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Vegoritida's Water Level and Catchment Area Alterations As A
    European Water 56: 3-12, 2016. © 2016 E.W. Publications Lake Vegoritida’s water level and catchment area alterations as a result of natural processes and human interventions L. Karamoutsou1*, A. Psilovikos1, P. Stålnacke 2 and C. Farkas2 1 Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, Fytokou Str., 38445, Nea Ionia, Magnesia, Greece 2 Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO, Frederik A. Dahls vei, 20, 1430, Ås, Norway * e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The catchment of Lake Vegoritida is a highly fragile environment. Within its borders there are four inland lakes hydraulically connected to each other. The area is historically characterized by intense industrial and agricultural activities. The objectives of this paper are the following: a) to study and report the modifications occurred to the Vegoritida’s Lake water level and the catchment’s area size due to human activities during the last sixty years (1955- 2016) and b) to review the existing scientific literature concerning the water balance of the lake and its water pollution. To this purpose, the software packages ArcGIS and Surfer were used. The results revealed that due to the completion of hydraulic projects construction that took place in the area, the catchment area was increased by 537% in comparison to 1955. Moreover, the lowest estimations for the absolute altitude, area size covered and water volumes of the lake correspond to the year 2002. However, since 2002 an increase in these parameters has occurred. Systematic information exchange and cooperation between farmers, water agencies, Public Power Corporation (PPC) and research institutes is proposed for the optimal utilization of the water resources of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Labor in Greek Agriculture
    Migrant labor in Greek agriculture -A case study- Thesis Report Supervisor: Dr. Ir. Marrit Van Den Berg, Assistant Professor Student: Andreas Tsakiridis Registration Number: 790920-843-050 Programme: MSc in Management, Economics & Consumer Studies Specialization: Economics, Environment & Policy Chair Group: Development Economics Wageningen University & Research Center November 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Background 6 1.1.1 Migration in Greece 6 1.1.2 A profile of the immigrant 7 population in Greece 1.1.3 Socio-economic effects of 10 migration in Greece 1.2 Problem statement 12 1.3 Research objectives and questions 15 Chapter 2: MIGRATION 16 THEORIES 2.1 The initiation of international 17 migration 2.2 The continuation of international 18 migration 2.3 The South European model of 19 immigration Chapter 3: LITERATURE 19 REVIEW 3.1 Household composition, labor 19 markets and labor demand 3.2 Technical and allocative efficiency 21 3.3 Earnings and occupational status 22 2 of immigrants in the host country 3.4 Remittances 23 Chapter 4: RESEARCH 25 METHODOLOGY AND DATA 4.1 Study area and data 25 4.2 Methodology 26 Chapter 5: ESTIMATION AND 30 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 5.1 Farmers’ decision on hiring extra 30 (non-family) labor 5.2 Technical and allocative efficiency 33 of farmers 5.3 Occupational choice of 38 immigrants 5.4 Remittance behavior of 42 immigrants Chapter 6: CONCLUSIONS 43 References 44 Appendices 50 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 24 3 Remittance motivations in the new economics of labor migration Figure 2 25 Location
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Greece So Far, the Four Nal Properties Worldwide
    a picture map is included Gastronomy Routes and the culture of Flavours... “The gentle art of gastronomy is a friendly one… it surpasses the language barrier, creates new friendships among civilized people and warms the heart”. Samuel Chamberlain What is “Food Travel” or “Culinary Tourism”? Who can be described as a “Food Traveler” or “Gastro-Tourist”? Nowadays, new tourism products are launched regularly: some are new venues for already existing interests while others are new products that address the demands of new niche-markets. For others, as observed in culinary tourism, it is not so much a new product but rather a focus on recognizing something that already exists, refining and improving the pursuit and enjoyment of unique food and drink experi- ences, both far and near to us! Many governments and local administration authorities throughout the world are turning to tourism initiatives not only to breathe new life into stagnating economies but also to address the grave problem of rural depopulation. Culinary tourism in rural settings holds promise as a potential springboard for rural economies to blossom…! The transaction cooperation network “Gastronomy Routes and the Culture of Flavors” involves 18 Local Action Groups which originate from four Medi- terranean countries, namely Italy, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus. The core and most crucial objective of the “Medeat” cooperation is to suc- ceed in maintaining and promoting the historical, cultural and qualitative dimensions of local cuisine, in a way that also connects it to local indus- tries, cultural events and supplementary tourist activities. This gastronomic guide presents the most interesting gastronomic itinerar- ies of the territory of Kilkis – Imathia – Kozani – Florina, in Greece, as well as practical information concerning the relative places to visit with local produce, food processing units, alternative accommodation premises and similar issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Current Silvoarable Systems in Europe ITALY
    WP2 : DELIVERABLE 2.1 Database of current silvoarable systems in Europe ITALY Type of Area Altitude Rainfall Slope Main tree Second tree Other tree ID System Village Municipality Prefecture Ownership Country Bedrock Soil type system (ha) (m) (mm) (%) species species species 18 Oaks and cereals Montefiascone Montefiascone Viterbo Private Italy Commercial 24 350 810 0-5 Volcanic Sandy Quercus spp. None None 19 Walnut and fruit trees Bolsena Bolsena Viterbo Private Italy Commercial 0,5 315 810 0-5 Volcanic Sandy Juglans regia None None Olive tree and Prunus 20 vegetables Bolsena Bolsena Viterbo Private Italy Commercial 0,2 315 810 0-5 Volcanic Sandy Olea europea Prunus persica domestica 21 Olive tree and cereals Monteromano Monteromano Viterbo Private Italy Commercial 1 230 580 0-5 Olea europea None None 22 Olive tree and cereals Canino Canino Viterbo Private Italy Commercial 0,4 205 650 0-5 Olea europea None None 23 Walnut and vegetables Scisciano Scisciano Napoli Private Italy Commercial 0,15 35 800 0-5 Volcanic Sandy Juglans regia None None 24 Walnut and cereals Brienza Brienza Potenza Private Italy Commercial 0,6 700 720 11-15 Juglans regia Corylus avellana None 25 Oaks and cereals Grumento Nova Grumento Nova Potenza Private Italy Commercial 1 600 610 6-10 Quercus spp. None None 26 Oaks and cereals Grumento Nova Grumento Nova Potenza Private Italy Commercial 1 600 610 0-5 Quercus spp. Pyrus spp. None 27 Walnut and vegetables Sant'Arcangelo Sant'Arcangelo Potenza Private Italy Commercial 0,15 300 500 0-5 Juglans regia Olea europea None 28 Poplar and cereals Polonghera Polonghera Cuneo Private Italy Commercial 100 245 1000 0-5 Alluvial soil Populus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Situation and Prospects for Areas in Energy Transition in Greece
    CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS FOR AREAS IN ENERGY TRANSITION IN GREECE Athens, July 2020 1 Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 11 1. Introduction - Raison d’ Etre .......................................................................................... 14 1.1. Why Energy Transition is Promoted Today...................................................................... 14 1.2. EU targets for 2030, 2050, European Commission New Green Deal ................................... 21 1.3. National Objectives: NECP, Long-Term Energy Strategy 2050 .......................................... 31 2. Capturing the Existing Situation in the Energy Transition Areas ................................... 33 2.1. Geographical - Economic Description of Areas in Transition (Western Macedonia, Megalopolis, North Aegean, South Aegean, Crete) ................................................................................... 43 2.2. Characteristics of Use of Fossil Fuels and Electricity at Local Level in the Energy Transition Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 54 2.2.1. About Lignite ........................................................................................................ 54 2.2.2. Lignite Mining Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated ESIA Greece Section 0 - Non Technical Summary Page 2 of 76 Area Comp
    Integrated ESIA Greece Section 0 - Non technical summary Page 2 of 76 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-ASP-642-Y-TAE-0047 Integrated ESIA Greece Document Title: Rev.: 00 SECTION 0 – Non Technical Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT 4 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 6 2.1 Project Rationale 6 2.2 Key Features of the Pipeline System 8 2.3 Project Construction 9 2.4 Implementation Timeline 10 3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES AND PREFERRED OPTIONS 11 3.1 Pipeline Route Alternatives and Base Case 11 3.1.1 Route Alternatives 11 3.1.2 Base case Route Description 13 3.2 Compressor Station Alternatives and Preferred Sites 14 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA 17 4.1 Introduction 17 4.2 Existing Physical and Biological Environment 17 4.2.1 Topography and Landscape 17 4.2.2 Vegetation 18 4.2.3 Wildlife 20 4.2.4 Protected Sites and Conservation Areas 21 4.3 Existing Socioeconomic Environment 23 4.4 Existing Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 25 5 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 28 5.1 Stakeholder Consultation and Project Information Disclosure 28 5.2 Grievance Mechanism 34 6 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS AND RISKS, AND FORESEEN MANAGEMENT MEASURES 35 6.1 Scope of the Assessment and Studies undertaken 35 6.2 Physical Environment - Impacts and Mitigation 36 6.2.1 Ambient Air Quality and Climate 36 6.2.2 Acoustic Environment 37 6.2.3 Water Resources (Groundwater and Surface Waters) 38 6.2.4 Subsurface and Soil Resources 39 6.2.5 Landscape and Visual Amenity 41 6.3 Biological Environment – Impacts and Mitigation 42 6.3.1 Vegetation and Habitat 42 Page 3 of 76 Area Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece in Figures (April
    HELLENIC REPUBLIC 1 2 0 HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY 2 e n GREECE IN FIGURES u J - l i r April - June 2021 p A S E R U G I F N I E C E E R G 6 T A T 1 ΤΑΤΙΣ Σ Τ Ι Η Κ S Κ Η Ι Α Ν Ρ L Η Χ Λ Η Λ Ε • 7 www.statistics.gr E ΑΤΙΣ ΣΤ Τ Ι Η Κ Κ Η Ι Α Ν Ρ Η Χ Λ Η Λ Ε • FOREWORD The Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) through the quar - terly publication Greece in figures, published in both the Greek and English languages, presents statistical data pro - viding an updated demographic, social and economic pic - ture of Greece in a clear and comprehensive manner. The publication Greece in figures is intended for users of sta - tistics who seek to have a comprehensive view of Greece, on the basis of the most recent statistical data. The statistical time series included in this publication are, mostly, compiled by ELSTAT. Furthermore, for comparability reasons, the pub - lication also presents, by theme, selected tables with statisti - cal data of EU Member States. The publication will be updated with the most recent data on a quarterly basis and will be posted on the portal of ELSTAT on the first Wednesday of January, April, July and Octo - ber . For more information on the data and statistics provided in Greece in figures , please contact the Division of Statistical In - formation and Publications of ELSTAT (tel: +30 213 1352301, +30 213 1352021 , e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • ESIA Amendment Greece Annex 6.5 Landscape Baseline Study
    ESIA Amendment Greece Annex 6.5 Landscape Baseline Study Page 2 of 60 Area Comp. System Disc. Doc.- Ser. EXERGIA S.A. E.ON Technologies GmbH Code Code Code Code Type No. Project Title: Trans Adriatic Pipeline – TAP GPL00-EXG-642-Y-TAE-1006 Document Title: Annex 6.5. Landscape Baseline Study Rev.: 0B / at13 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 STUDY METHODOLOGY 5 Study Area 5 Methodology 5 2.2.2 Field Survey 7 2.2.3 Landscape Quality Criteria and Sensitivity 7 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDSCAPE BASELINE 11 4 VISUAL AMENITY 17 Block Valve Stations 17 Pipe Yards 26 Camp Sites 54 List of Tables Table 2-1 Landscape Quality and sensitivity 9 Table 2-2 Grades of landscape sensitivity to change 9 Table 2-3 Viewpoints sensitivity grades 10 Table 4-1 Block Valve Stations visual receptors sensitivity 25 Table 4-2 Pipe yard visual receptors sensitivity 53 Table 4-3 Camp sites visual receptors sensitivity 58 List of Figures Figure 4-1 Area of GBV02 (VP-6; , IP 109-8) 17 Figure 4-2 Area of GBV08 (VP-25; IP 416-4) 18 Figure 4-3 Area of GBV09 (VP-27; IP 450-22) 18 Figure 4-4 Area of GBV10 (VP-32; IP 502) 19 Figure 4-5 Area of GBV11 (VP-43; IP 550-1) 19 Figure 4-6 Area of GBV12 (VP-44; IP 581) 20 Figure 4-7 Area of GBV13 (VP-49; IP 637-2) 20 Figure 4-8 Area of GBV14 (VP-54; IP 676) 21 Figure 4-9 Area of GBV18 (VP-71; IP 1058) 22 Figure 4-10 Area of GBV21 (VP-72; IP 1175) 23 Figure 4-11 Area of GBV22 (VP-65; IP 1230) 23 Figure 4-12 Area of GBV23 (VP-68; IP 1277) 24 Figure 4-13 Area of GPY 01 (VP-1; IP 41) 26 Figure 4-14 Area of GPY 02 (VP-2; IP 109) 27 Figure 4-15 Area of GPY2_1 (VP-3; IP 109) 27 Figure 4-16 Area of GPY2_2 (VP-4; IP 109) 28 Figure 4-17 Area of GPY2_3 (VP-5; IP 109) 28 Figure 4-18 Area of GPY2_4 (VP-7; IP 109-4) 29 Figure 4-19 Area of GPY2_5 (VP-8; IP 109-9) 29 Figure 4-20 Area of GPY3_1 (VP-9; IP 224) 30 Figure 4-21 Area of GPY 04 (VP-13; IP 251-10) 30 Page 3 of 60 Area Comp.
    [Show full text]