CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE 2001–2003 Annual Report

GLOBAL THINKNET

CIVILNET

POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

President’s Message 2 CivilNet 23 JCIE Activities 5 Promoting Civil Society and Philanthropy 25 The Role of Philanthropy in Postwar U.S.-Japan Global ThinkNet 7 Relations 25 Study and Dialogue Projects 9 GrantCraft—Japanese Video Project 25 APAP Forums and Seminars 9 International Survey Project—The Civil Society Global ThinkNet Conference, 10 Sector and NGO Activities in Asia and Europe 26 Intellectual Dialogue on Building Survey on the Status of Exchange Programs Asia’s Tomorrow 10 between the U.S. and Japan 26 A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe Dialogue 11 Seminar Series with Civil Society Leaders 26 Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue 12 Study Mission on American Philanthropy 27 Cooperation with the Asia Pacific Philanthropy Policy-Oriented Research 13 Consortium (APPC) 27 Vision of Asia Pacific in the 21st Century 13 Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Asia Pacific and the Global Order Overseas Foundations and Corporations 29 After September 11 13 Levi Strauss Foundation Advised Fund of JCIE 29 The Rise of China and the Changing East Asian Order 14 “Positive Lives Asia” Photo Exhibition Tour 31 Asia Pacific Security Outlook 14 Goldman Sachs Global Leaders Program 31 Force, Intervention, and Sovereignty 15 Lucent Global Science Scholars Program 32 New Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations 15 Civil Society and Grassroots-Level Governance for a New Century: Japanese Exchanges 33 Challenges, American Experience 16 A50 Caravan 33 The Future of Governance and the Role Asia Pacific Leadership Program in Tokyo 33 of Politicians 17 Grassroots Network 34 The Transformation of Japanese Communities Miyazaki Prefecture Commemorative and the Emerging Local Agenda 18 Symposiums on Internationalization 34 The Intellectual Infrastructure for East Asian Community-Building 18 Political Exchange Program 35 Support and Cooperation for Research and U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program 37 Dialogue 19 U.S. Congressional Staff Exchange Program 38 Trilateral Commission 19 Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC) 19 U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program 39 UK-Japan 21st Century Group 20 Korea-Japan Forum 20 Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program 41 German-Japanese Forum 21 Israel-Japan Intellectual Exchange Program 21 Publications 43 Japan Center for Asian Historical Records— Appendices 48 Commissioned Planning Research 22 Contributors 48 Workshop on Conflict and Development: Board Members and Officers 49 Roles of JBIC 22 Staff and Associates 50

In this publication, Japanese names are written with the given name first and family name last. All other names follow the order of the individual’s country of origin. For details and updates on the projects and programs described in this report, please see the JCIE website at . PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

henever I look back on the activities of JCIE, as I do now for the previous two W years, I find myself experiencing a mixture of emotions. There is a strong sense of accomplishment at what we have been able to achieve. However, this is tem- pered by the feeling that, in these remarkable times, there is a need for us to make an even greater contribution. I believe the depth of these sentiments arises from the fact that JCIE remains one of Japan’s very few autonomous nonprofit organizations in the field of interna- tional affairs. The demands placed upon such organizations have grown markedly along with the progress of globalization and the concomitant pluralization of society on the domestic level. As a result, there is an inevitable gap between the many accomplishments that we can claim and the potential for even greater achievement. Nonetheless, that gap provides me with a renewed sense of mission and a stronger desire to meet the challenges ahead. In particular, I hope that we will be able to seize new opportunities where JCIE, as an innovative and responsive actor in the field of international affairs, can make a unique contribution. One example of an area that holds new challenges and opportunities is the dynamic evo- lution of East Asia in the past few years, which is driving JCIE’s increasing efforts to mobilize scholars and public intellectuals in the region to tackle common challenges. The region is facing numerous challenges, including the effects of the rise of China, the need to redefine the U.S. regional security role, the nuclear threat of North Korea, and a variety of human security concerns. Clearly, there is a greater demand than ever for JCIE, with its three-decade history of conducting dialogues and building collaborative networks in Asia Pacific, to play a role in pro- moting joint regional efforts to tackle these critical issues. Moreover, JCIE has a particular responsibility to ensure that the emerging East Asia, as the third pillar of the increasingly regionalized global architecture, will form closer ties and collaborative relationships with the other regions of the world, and particularly with North America and the united Europe. JCIE has been instrumental in reorganizing the Trilateral Commission, replacing Japan as the soli- tary nation in the third wing of the Commission with a Pacific Asia group that adds several East Asian countries to the trialogue. JCIE also serves as the Asian secretariat for the Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC), which is designed to promote greater cooperation among

T intellectual leaders and policy research institutions in Asia and Europe. Results of the CAEC task forces and plenary discussions are presented for use in the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) REPOR process with the purpose of enhancing this forum for multilateral cooperation. Similarly, the impressive growth of civil society is another dimension of the evolution of ANNUAL East Asia in recent years where JCIE can play a significant role. We have increasingly seen collaborative networks of NGOs and NPOs working to address sociopolitical and economic JCIE 2001–2003

2 • PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

issues that transcend national boundaries. Cooperative arrangements among these organiza- tions and interaction between their staff are also on the rise, as they seek to learn from one another how to more effectively mobilize and enhance human and financial resources and strengthen internal governance. JCIE has been able to play a catalytic role in such efforts, and we hope to make an even greater contribution in this area in the coming years. For example, JCIE has played a leading role in organizing a major research project of the Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium (APPC) on the theme of “Governance, Organizational Effectiveness, and the Nonprofit Sector in Asia Pacific.” In such efforts, JCIE has played a role in enhancing interaction between Asian civil society organizations and their North American and European counterparts. New challenges have been rapidly emerging on a global scale as well. In the wake of the tragic events of 9-11, it has repeatedly been said that the world has fundamentally changed and the traditional rules of international relations have been invalidated. The chain of events leading up to the war in Iraq seems to support this widely held view. Many new issues have emerged in international relations, including the threat posed by new kinds of international terrorists, various human security threats, issues of humanitarian intervention, and the rele- vance of multilateral institutions, particularly the United Nations. These are all challenges to global governance, and they call for multilateral, multidisciplinary, and multisectoral approaches, which JCIE is uniquely qualified to carry out. JCIE seeks to meet the wide range of challenges facing Japan in its external relations through three major clusters of activities—the Global ThinkNet program of policy research and dialogues, the CivilNet program that promotes civil society in Japan and abroad, and the Political Exchange Program. In recent years, JCIE’s activities have increasingly tended to cut across these programmatic clusters, reflecting the greater pluralism in society and the need for cross-sectoral approaches to today’s increasingly complex issues. JCIE’s programs have helped emerging political leaders in Japan become increasingly involved in policy debate and have encouraged them to collaborate with NGO leaders to induce a more enabling environ- ment for civil society. Other activities have drawn local communities in Japan into substantive exchanges with their American, Asian, and other counterparts to explore policy responses for T common issues such as migration and environment. And JCIE policy research on diverse REPOR issues such as governance and human security is eliciting the participation of political and NGO leaders alongside intellectual leaders. These developments have made us conscious of ANNUAL the greater need for collaboration with partners here and abroad in diverse sectors, including the civil society, corporate, and public sectors. JCIE 2001–2003

PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE • 3

As we have endeavored to meet these many daunting challenges, we have become acutely conscious of the need to further improve our own organizational capacity. Over the past few years, we have experienced a reinforcement and rejuvenation of our staff, whose professional expertise and commitment make JCIE stand out in Japan’s civil society. In particular, the recent change of leadership in JCIE/USA, our affiliate in the United States, has added a new dimension and vigor to our overall activities. We also have bolstered a solid network of insti- tutional and individual partners abroad, particularly in East Asia, in recent months with a con- scious effort to enhance information sharing and collaborative arrangements. Even with these positive developments, I have to acknowledge the urgent need for JCIE to continue its effort to make greater contributions to the improvement of Japan’s external rela- tionships, the enhancement of its international role, and the strengthening of its cooperative relationships with other countries. The challenges are enormous, and they make us more con- scious of our limits. As we move forward to take on these challenges, I am acutely aware of the sincere and substantial help of many friends and supporters in Japan and abroad in making it possible for us to remain an independent and creative institution. Our resolve would be meaningless with- out their continued encouragement and assistance. I wish to express my most sincere grati- tude to them, and wish to reiterate my hope, joined by my colleagues in JCIE, to continue to build JCIE as an effective and sustainable institution that can play a pivotal role in enhancing Japan’s role in the international community.

Tadashi Yamamoto President T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

4 • PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

JCIE ACTIVITIES April 2001–March 2003

2001 Apr. 22–May 3 U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 16th Japanese Delegation to the U.S. May 6–16 Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium—Bangladesh Freedom Foundation Board of Trustees Tokyo Observation Visit May 13 Lucent Global Science Scholars Program Award May 22 Goldman Sachs Global Leaders Program Award May 23–25 A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe Dialogue, Chiba May 27–June 5 Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 11th Australian Delegation to Japan June 11–12 New Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations book launch seminars, New York and Washington, D.C. July 12 Miyazaki Prefecture Commemorative Symposium on Internationalization July 16–17 Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium—“Strengthening Philanthropy in the Asia Pacific: An Agenda for Action” Conference, Bali Aug. 5–12 Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 9th Japanese Delegation to Australia Sept. 1–2 9th Korea-Japan Forum, Gangwon Province Sept. 8 The A50 Commemorative Ceremony, Tokyo Sept. 8–14 The A50 Caravan Oct. 13–14 3rd Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue, Tokyo Oct. 9–16 5th Israel-Japan Intellectual Exchange Program, Tokyo and Hiroshima Nov. 2–4 Asia Pacific Security Outlook workshop, Bangkok Nov. 4–15 U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 20th U.S. Delegation to Japan Nov. 18 Vision of Asia Pacific in the 21st Century workshop, Tokyo Nov. 19–20 5th Global ThinkNet Conference, Tokyo Nov. 30–Dec. 1 Trilateral Commission Pacific Asia Group Meeting, Hong Kong Dec. 4–5 2nd APAP Myanmar Seminar 2002 Feb. 2–4 10th German-Japanese Forum, Tokyo Feb. 17–24 17th U.S. Congressional Staff Exchange Program Feb. 21–24 18th UK-Japan 21st Century Group Conference, Ditchley Park Feb. 26–28 7th APAP Forum, Siem Reap Mar. 16–17 4th Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Tomorrow, Kisarazu Mar. 24–30 U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program, 25th U.S. Congressional Delegation to Japan Apr. 6–8 Trilateral Commission 33rd Plenary Meeting Apr. 6–14 Study Mission on American Philanthropy to the United States

May 25–June 1 Asia Pacific Leadership Program, Tokyo T June 15–28 U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 17th Japanese Delegation to the U.S. July 2–4 Seminar Series with Civil Society Leaders (Buzz Schmidt, Chairman and CEO of GuideStar) REPOR July 16 2nd Miyazaki Prefecture Commemorative Symposium on Internationalization

July 28–Aug. 6 Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 12th Australian Delegation to Japan ANNUAL Sept. 6–8 10th Korea-Japan Forum, Kanazawa JCIE 2001–2003

JCIE ACTIVITIES• 5

JCIE ACTIVITIES April 2001–March 2003

Sept. 12–13 Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC) London Plenary Conference Sept. 15–17 A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe Dialogue, Tampere, Finland Oct. 12–13 Role of Philanthropy in Postwar U.S.-Japan Relations workshop, Pocantico, New York Nov. 4–6 Asia Pacific Security Outlook workshop, Kuala Lumpur Nov. 7–9 4th Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue, Chiba Nov. 9–22 U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 21st U.S. Delegation to Japan Nov. 19 Role of Philanthropy in Postwar U.S.-Japan Relations workshop, Tokyo Nov. 22–24 Trilateral Commission Pacific Asia Group regional meeting, Singapore Dec. 11–12 5th Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Tomorrow, Bangkok 2003 Jan. 9–10 Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium—“Governance, Organizational Effectiveness, and the Nonprofit Sector” Conference, Manila Jan. 29 Workshop on Conflict and Development: Roles of JBIC, Tokyo Feb. 7–8 3rd APAP Myanmar Seminar Feb. 9–14 Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program, 10th Japanese Delegation to Australia Feb. 14–16 19th UK-Japan 21st Century Group Conference, Kamakura Feb. 25–26 5th Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Tomorrow, Tokyo workshop Mar. 4–5 CAEC Paris workshop Mar. 5–7 11th German-Japanese Forum, Berlin Mar. 8–9 Role of Philanthropy in Postwar U.S.-Japan Relations workshop, Cambridge Mar. 14–16 Launch of GrantCraft video at Japan NPO Research Association annual meeting Mar. 21–23 8th APAP Forum, Kunming T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

6 • JCIE ACTIVITIES GLOBAL THINKNET Policy Research & Dialogue GLOBAL THINKNET: Policy Research & Dialogue

he Global ThinkNet Program enables JCIE to act as a network-oriented policy research Tinstitution, relying on a relatively small core of in-house researchers who work together with outside experts and research institutions in Japan and abroad. Since 1996, this program has allowed JCIE to respond to the rapidly changing research agenda of today’s world by engaging in policy-oriented study and dialogue projects on cutting-edge issues. It has also served as a vehicle for JCIE to strengthen and foster networks of independent policy research institutions and researchers, both in the Asia Pacific region and globally. The interrelated issues of globalization and governance are a major concern of JCIE, and are the focus of most Global ThinkNet projects. They are approached from a variety of angles, generally through research and dialogue projects on topics that fit loosely into four inter- related categories: 1) the improvement of governance on the domestic, regional, and global levels, and particularly the role of civil society in governance; 2) regional community- building in Asia Pacific; 3) the delineation of the roles and potential contributions of Japan and Asia Pacific to the global system; and 4) the translation of the concept of human security into policy and its effective implementation. JCIE makes a concerted effort to include promising, young intellectual leaders in many of its projects in order to develop a “successor generation” of policy thinkers who can partici- pate effectively in collaborative research and dialogue. In addition to its own research and dia- logue projects, JCIE facilitates projects for other organizations, serving as the secretariat for multilateral forums and occasionally conducting commissioned research. T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

8 • GLOBAL THINKNET

Study and Dialogue Projects

Asia Pacific Agenda Project respective paper writers. A session was also Forums and Seminars devoted to the exploration of an emerging Asia The Asia Pacific Agenda Project (APAP) has Pacific research/dialogue agenda. The forum been a centerpiece of the Global ThinkNet consisted of the following sessions: activities since 1996. This multinational con- Perspectives of Islam in Asia on the Post–9-11 sortium of policy research organizations and Global System academic institutions is designed to strengthen Perspectives of Japan, China, and the United networks and enhance joint research and dia- States logue among institutions and intellectual lead- Impact on Major Power Relations ers in Asia Pacific. JCIE and the consortium’s Implications for International Organizations other member institutions sponsor numerous Emerging Asia Pacific Agenda joint policy research projects related to Asia Pacific and hold workshops, seminars, and an APAP Kunming Forum annual forum to discuss their research findings. The APAP Forum 2003 was convened in In addition to the annual forums held in Kunming, China, on March 21–23, 2003. The Cambodia and China and the workshops in location of this year’s forum was particularly Myanmar described below, JCIE conducted appropriate given that the meeting’s central two multilateral research projects that served theme was the opportunities and challenges as the basis for discussions at those meetings— that the rise of China as a regional power pres- “Asia Pacific and the Global Order After ents for the task of regional community- September 11” and “The Rise of China and the building. Emerging intellectual leaders from Changing East Asian Order” (see Policy- China, Japan, Korea, and several ASEAN coun- Oriented Research). tries, members of a joint task force on this theme, presented their findings, which were APAP Siem Reap Forum discussed among some 30 participants from More than 30 experts from 15 countries gath- 14 Asia Pacific countries who attended this ered in Siem Reap, Cambodia, on February conference despite the outbreak of SARS and 26–28, 2002, for the APAP Forum. The the war in Iraq. The forum consisted of the fol- Cambodian Institute of Cooperation and Peace lowing sessions: hosted the meeting, and His Excellency Hor Political and Economic Developments in China Namhong, senior minister and minister of for- Perspectives of Other East Asian Neighbors

eign affairs and international cooperation, gave T Perspectives of ASEAN Countries and Australia a special address. The main theme of the Cultural Implications of the Rise of China for the REPOR forum was “Asia Pacific and the Global Order Region After September 11,” and provisional findings China and the Asia Pacific Community and conclusions from the multilateral project ANNUAL of the same name (see the Policy-Oriented Research section) were presented by the JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 9

Study and Dialogue Projects

APAP Myanmar Seminars see the Policy-Oriented Research section.) In 2000, the ASEAN Institutes of Strategic and Moreover, the Tokyo Conference was a culmi- International Studies (ASEAN-ISIS), along nation of the research and networks cultivated with JCIE, started a collaborative effort to throughout the past five years since the develop a policy dialogue with their counter- launching of the Global ThinkNet. That we parts at the Myanmar Institute of Strategic and were able to attract as many as 80 leading intel- International Studies. To follow up on this lectuals from all over the world to discuss such effort, the Second Myanmar Seminar was held a wide range of well-studied issues was testi- in Yangon on December 4–5, 2001, and the mony to the viability and effectiveness of the Third Myanmar Seminar was held on February concept of the “thinknet.” 7–8, 2003, also in Yangon. The proceedings of the final session on “The Impact of September 11 on Asia Pacific Global ThinkNet and the Global Order” were published as Conference, Tokyo Asian Reflections on a New World After 9-11, Since March 1997, the Global ThinkNet and a report on the entire conference can be Conference series has brought together mem- found on the JCIE website. bers of the various Global ThinkNet research projects, representatives of policy research Intellectual Dialogue on institutions, political leaders, and international Building Asia’s Tomorrow affairs experts from around the world to Since 1998, JCIE has organized a series of explore the new agenda facing international research and dialogue projects on “human society. On November 19–20, 2001, approxi- security.” This initiative was a response to a call mately 80 participants took part in the Fifth made by then Foreign Minister Keizo Obuchi Global ThinkNet Conference in Tokyo. Topics for a region-wide intellectual dialogue on the discussed at this conference included the human toll of the Asian financial crisis. As part following: of the initial year of the Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Tomorrow, JCIE, in Governance for a New Century cooperation with the Institute of Southeast The New Policy Agenda and the Role of Politicians Asian Studies (ISEAS), convened a conference Force, Intervention, and Sovereignty in Tokyo in December 1998, on the theme of Vision of Asia Pacific in the 21st Century “The Asian Crisis: Meeting the Challenges to

T The Impact of September 11 on Asia Pacific and Human Security.” Regular meetings have been the Global Order held in the ensuing years to further explore the

REPOR potential of human security as a new policy Behind each of the above sessions were full- framework and to seek ways to translate the

ANNUAL fledged multilateral research projects whose concept into concrete action. findings were shared with the participants of the conference. (For details of these projects, JCIE 2001–2003

10 • GLOBAL THINKNET

Study and Dialogue Projects

Fourth Intellectual Dialogue: has become important to clarify what human Health and Human Security security projects would entail. For this pur- The Fourth Intellectual Dialogue on Building pose, the Fifth Intellectual Dialogue, held in Asia’s Tomorrow was held on March 16–17, Bangkok on December 11–12, 2002, was 2002, in Kisarazu, Japan. It had been stressed designed to explore key indicators of human at previous meetings that in order to further security and feasible methods of evaluation for advance the international debate on human human security projects. security, more practical policy discussions were required, and that this could best be A Gender Agenda: accomplished by examining in-depth case Asia-Europe Dialogue studies of effective responses to specific The establishment of the annual Asia-Europe human security threats. Accordingly, case stud- Meeting (ASEM) in 1996 has led to an increased ies were commissioned on one of the most exchange of ideas and information between serious and conspicuous human security chal- Asia and Europe over the past five years. lenges in East Asia: the lack of primary health However, there has been little direct discussion care for the poor. These focused on Cambodia, on the topic of gender. Recognizing this gap, Indonesia, and the Philippines, and were pre- the Japanese government and members of the sented for discussion before approximately 40 ASEM partnership agreed to bring together key health and human security experts and other individuals from the two regions to initiate an leading Asian public intellectuals who took Asia-Europe dialogue on gender issues. In part in the conference. response, the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) and JCIE began a study and dialogue project Fifth Intellectual Dialogue: Evaluation entitled “A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe of Human Security Projects Dialogue.” The Intellectual Dialogue on Asia’s Future series played a significant role in the estab- A Gender Agenda I: Asia-Europe lishment of the Commission on Human Dialogue—New Visions and Security in 2000. The Commission, which was Perspectives for Women and Men co-chaired by Sadako Ogata, former UN High On May 23–25, 2001, a conference was con- Commissioner for Refugees, and Amartya Sen, vened in Chiba, Japan, bringing together 70 Nobel Laureate in Economics, published a final participants from 21 of the ASEM partner

report in May 2003 that offers specific recom- nations. Issues discussed included globaliza- T mendations for the implementation of the con- tion, the feminization of poverty, and the IT cept of human security. The Japanese revolution; the human dimension of the econ- REPOR Government has also recently created a ¥15 omy and the issue of “engendering the

billion program of Grant Assistance to budget”; and transformational approaches to ANNUAL Grassroots Human Security Projects. In order political decision-making that incorporate new to promote such human security initiatives, it gender perspectives. The results of the meeting JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 11

Study and Dialogue Projects

and research papers were published in English 2002, to explore the bilateral relationship in and Japanese. the context of the long-term changes under- way in the Asia Pacific region, particularly A Gender Agenda II: Asia-Europe China’s emergence as a regional power. Dialogue—Transformational Approach Participants considered the perspectives of to the Roles of Women and Men in both Russia and Japan on the rapid develop- Political Decision-Making and ment of China and its influence on the region, Economic Life as well as the impact on the Japan-Russia rela- The second conference on A Gender Agenda tionship of China’s relationship with each was held in Tampere, Finland, on September country. 15–17, 2002. Two study groups focusing on the roles of women and men as agents of change in political decision-making and the economy reported their findings at the Tampere confer- ence to a diverse group of 58 leading experts. The meeting produced recommendations for ASEM partner nations, international organiza- tions, and civil society actors. A meeting report is forthcoming in 2003.

Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue Since 1997, JCIE has been organizing the Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue, a track-two sem- inar bringing together opinion leaders and nongovernmental leaders from both countries to discuss possible areas of cooperation. JCIE held its Third Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue on October 13–14, 2001, in Tokyo, where four Russian and six Japanese opinion leaders met to exchange views on a variety of issues. Meetings were also arranged for the Russian

T participants with a number of Japanese Diet members before and after the workshop so

REPOR they could discuss politics and foreign rela- tions, including the antiterrorism legislation

ANNUAL under consideration in the Diet. The Fourth Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue was held in Chiba, Japan, on November 7–9, JCIE 2001–2003

12 • GLOBAL THINKNET

Policy-Oriented Research

Vision of Asia Pacific Yumiko Okamoto, Nagoya University, Japan in the 21st Century Toward a New Security Order in Pacific Asia Yoon Young-kwan, Seoul National This multinational research project brought University, Korea together a team of promising, young scholars A Vision of Democratic Changes in Pacific Asia to examine the significant mid-term and long- Yu Xuejing, China Population Information term challenges facing the Asia Pacific region. and Research Center, China The project began with a general assessment of the broad social, political, economic, and Asia Pacific and the Global cultural changes affecting the region, and Order After September 11 moved on to an examination of specific issues Under the leadership of Professor Han Sung- most important to building a peaceful, pros- Joo, president of Korea University’s Ilmin perous, and just region for the 21st century: International Relations Institute, APAP organ- security, the information technology revolu- ized a multilateral research team consisting of tion, trade and investment regimes, sustainable Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, development, demographic change, and gov- Malaysian, and Singaporean researchers. The ernance. An initial workshop was held in the following individuals contributed papers. spring of 2001 in the Philippines, where mem- bers of the research team met to discuss their Participants: findings, and a second workshop was held in Perspectives of Islam in Asia on the Post–9-11 November 2001 in Tokyo. The findings were Global System Farish Noor, Institute of Strategic Studies, subsequently presented at the Fifth Global Malaysia * ThinkNet Tokyo Conference, and will be pub- Rizal Sukma, Center for Strategic and lished as Pacific Asia 2022. International Studies, Indonesia * Perspectives of Japan, China, and the Participants: United States Attempts at Regional Architecture Chu Shulong, Tsinghua University, China * Simon Tay, Project Director, Singapore Narushige Michishita, National Institute for Institute of International Affairs, Singapore Defense Studies, Japan * From Economic Crisis to Global Governance Charles Morrison, East-West Center, in Pacific Asia United States Ake Tangsupvattana, Chulalongkorn Impact on Major Power Relations and University, Thailand Implications for International Organizations

Environmental Change and Sustainability Chin Kin-Wah, Singapore Institute of T Transitions in Pacific Asia International Affairs, Singapore *

Louis Lebel, Chiang Mai University, Thailand Lee Shin-wha, Ilmin International Relations REPOR The Impact of ICT in Pacific Asia Institute, Korea * Jamus Jerome Lim, Institute of Southeast Emerging Asia Pacific Agenda ANNUAL Asian Studies, Singapore Jusuf Wanandi, Center for Strategic and Toward the Formation of an East Asian Regional International Studies, Indonesia Arrangement JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 13

Policy-Oriented Research

Paul Evans, University of British Columbia, Sung-Hee Jwa, Korea Economic Research Canada Institute, Korea The papers marked with an (*) above will be published Perspectives of ASEAN Countries and in 2003 as Coping with 9-11: Asian Perspectives on Global and Regional Order. Australia Noel Morada, Institute for Strategic and The Rise of China and the Development Studies, Philippines Changing East Asian Order Mari Pangestu, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta Under the joint leadership of three senior intel- Greg Austin, European Institute for Asian lectual leaders in the region—Wang Jisi, direc- Studies, Belgium tor of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Cultural Implications of the Rise of China on Social Sciences, Ryosei Kokubun, professor of the Region , and Jusuf Wanandi of CSIS Wang Gungwu, East Asian Institute, Jakarta—a major research project was organ- Singapore ized in 2002 to study the opportunities and China and the Asia Pacific Community Wang Jisi, Institute of American Studies, challenges that the rise of China as a regional CASS, China power presents for the task of regional Ryosei Kokubun, Keio University, Japan community-building. Emerging intellectual Jusuf Wanandi, CSIS, Jakarta leaders from China, Japan, Korea, and several Chia Siow Yue, Singapore Institute of ASEAN countries formed a joint task force. The International Affairs paper writers are listed below, and their papers will be compiled as The Rise of China and the Asia Pacific Security Outlook Changing East Asian Order. Since 1997, JCIE has sponsored the Asia Pacific Security Outlook (APSO), an annual research Participants: project on regional security issues that pro- Political and Economic Developments in duces a publication of the same name. The China APSO project, which is organized in coopera- Men Honghua, Institute of International Strategic Studies, Central Party School, tion with the ASEAN Institutes for Strategic and China International Studies (ASEAN-ISIS) and the Yang Guangbin, School of International East-West Center, monitors changing percep- Studies, Renmin University, China tions of countries in the region in regard to Wang Rongjun, Institute of American their security environment, national defense Studies, Chinese Academy of Social issues, and contributions to regional and Sciences (CASS), China

T global security. APSO activities are carried out Ni Feng, Insitute of American Studies, CASS, under multinational leadership, and the bulk China REPOR of the work is conducted by a team of security Perspectives of Other East Asian Neighbors Akio Takahara, Rikkyo University, Japan analysts, many of them younger specialists,

ANNUAL Hideo Ohashi, Senshu University, Japan each of whom writes a background paper on Geun Lee, School of International and Area his or her own country. Studies, Seoul National University, Korea JCIE 2001–2003

14 • GLOBAL THINKNET Policy-Oriented Research

On November 2–4, 2001, authors gathered liminary report was presented at the Fifth in Bangkok for a workshop to prepare for the Global ThinkNet Conference in Tokyo in 2002 edition, and a similar group met in Kuala November 2001. Country and regional per- Lumpur on November 4–6, 2002, to discuss the spectives on humanitarian intervention and 2003 edition. Each year, Asia Pacific Security sovereignty provided by the participants will Outlook is published in time to be submitted be published in 2003 as Humanitarian to the Senior Officials Meeting of the ASEAN Intervention. Regional Forum (ARF) as a reference material. Countries covered include ARF members and Participants: nonmembers: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Koji Watanabe, Project Director, JCIE; former Cambodia, Canada, China, the European Ambassador to Russia, Japan Union, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Republic Jia Qingguo, School of International Studies, of Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, New Zealand, Peking University, China Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Russia, Kim Sung-han, Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, Ministry of Foreign Singapore, Thailand, the United States, and Affairs and Trade, South Korea Vietnam. Abstracts of the most recent edition Koji Murata, Department of Politics, and overview chapters of past editions are Doshisha University, Japan available on the JCIE website. Jasjit Singh, Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis, India Force, Intervention, and Rizal Sukma, Centre for Strategic and Sovereignty International Studies, Indonesia The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Simon Tay, Singapore Institute of International Affairs, Singapore (NATO’s) intervention in Kosovo in 1999 high- lighted the contentious debate over “humani- tarian intervention” in the field of international New Perspectives on relations. Under the direction of JCIE Senior U.S.-Japan Relations Fellow Koji Watanabe, a team of researchers Two days of seminars were held in the United examined the growing debate in Asia over the States to launch a new publication, New appropriate use of force, the conditions under Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations, which which intervention merits international sanc- was edited by Gerald Curtis (Columbia tion, and the limits of national sovereignty. The University) and features chapters by eight

research team first gathered for a workshop on younger Japanese and American scholars. The T February 13, 2001, in Cebu, the Philippines. seminars were held on June 11, 2001, in New

Discussions at the workshop dealt with issues York, in cooperation with the Japan Society REPOR such as the question of whether there are dis- and the Council on Foreign Relations, and on

tinct Asian perspectives on sovereignty and June 12, 2001, in Washington, D.C., in coopera- ANNUAL intervention and the future course of the tion with the Woodrow Wilson International debate on humanitarian intervention. A pre- Center for Scholars. The seminars addressed JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 15 Policy-Oriented Research

developments in Japanese domestic politics, stagnation and deteriorating public trust in such as the prospects of the Koizumi adminis- political processes. As a result, it was decided tration. The outlook for U.S.-Japan relations that the greatest possible contribution of the was also discussed, touching on the recent dis- study would be for the five Japanese scholars array in Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and practitioners on the research team to ana- complaints about a seeming lack of direction lyze several of Japan’s governance challenges— in Japanese foreign policy, and fears of public disenchantment with politics, the role American unilateralism. of the public sector in private affairs, the poli- cymaking process, political finance, and party Seminar Participants: structure—and then for the five American Gerald L. Curtis, Columbia University, policy experts to respond with insights from United States American experiences with reform. Thomas S. Foley, former U.S. Ambassador to As part of the project, an initial workshop Japan and former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, United States was held in Tokyo in April 1999, and draft Takashi Kiuchi, Shinsei Bank, Ltd., Japan papers were presented at a second workshop, Akihiko Tanaka, Institute of Oriental held in Washington, D.C., in March 2001. Culture, University of Tokyo, Japan Additional meetings were held to elicit the Moderators: views of politicians, journalists, and other Lawrence Korb, Council on Foreign opinion leaders in both countries, and a new Relations, United States set of papers was presented at the Fifth Global Tadashi Yamamoto, JCIE, Japan ThinkNet Tokyo Conference in November 2001. These were published in English in May Governance for a New Century: 2002 under the title Governance for a New Japanese Challenges, American Century, and are also available in Japanese on Experience the JCIE website. Both Japan and the United States have long Participants: wrestled with the issue of how to reform their respective systems of governance, in part to Managing the Problems of Political Finance Thomas E. Mann, Project Codirector, The meet the challenges arising from globalization Brookings Institution, United States and the pluralization of societal interests. In The Changing Shape of Party Politics and 1998, JCIE and the Brookings Institution Governance in Japan Takeshi Sasaki, Project Codirector, University

T launched a comparative study on the premise that Japan and the United States face many of Tokyo, Japan

REPOR similar challenges of governance. However, as Tadashi Yamamoto, Project Codirector, JCIE, Japan the project progressed, it became obvious that The Economy and the Future of Japanese ANNUAL Japan in particular was facing a serious crisis Political Reform of governance with profound implications for E. J. Dionne, Jr., Washington Post; The its ability to deal with its decade-long economic Brookings Institution JCIE 2001–2003

16 • GLOBAL THINKNET Policy-Oriented Research

Breaking the State Monopoly on Public Affairs emerging political leaders met regularly and Hideki Kato, Japan Initiative; Keio conducted case studies of the policymaking University, Japan process in the fields of finance, information The Tides of Reform Arrive in Japan technology, education, and regulatory and fiscal Paul C. Light, The Brookings Institution policy in order to identify the appropriate roles The Promise and Peril of Legislative Reform of politicians and desirable changes in the James M. Lindsay, The Brookings Institution policy processes. The results of their research Changes in the Japanese Policymaking were presented at the Fifth Global ThinkNet Process Yasuhisa Shiozaki, Member, House of Conference in Tokyo in November 2001 and Representatives, Japan were subsequently published in 2002 in both Money and Politics in Japan English (Policymaking in Japan: Defining the Masaki Taniguchi, University of Tokyo, Role of Politicians) and Japanese (Seijika no Japan yakuwari-seiji shudo o genba kara tou). The Limits of Institutional Reform in Japan R. Kent Weaver, The Brookings Institution Participants: Changes in the Japanese Policymaking Politicians and Bureaucrats: What’s Wrong Process and What’s to Be Done Shin’ichi Yoshida, Asahi Shimbun; Gerald L. Curtis, Project Director, Columbia University of Tokyo, Japan University; Visiting Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, The Future of Governance and Japan the Role of Politicians The Finance Diet of 1998 Motohisa Furukawa, Member, House of A major evolution in Japan’s system of gover- Representatives, Democratic Party of nance has been taking place in recent years as Japan (DPJ) politicians have become increasingly active in New Policy Challenges in Education the policymaking process, where bureaucrats Hiroshi Hase, Member, House of used to play the predominant role. The nature Representatives, Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and implications of this emerging trend are not Information Technology: New Policy Issues yet widely understood, and politicians face and the Role of Politicians numerous obstacles as they attempt to formu- Tatsuya Ito, Member, House of late informed, effective, and timely policies. In Representatives, LDP order to gain insight into the growing role of Toward a Fundamental Review of PublicWorks

politicians and to explore ways to improve T Seiji Maehara, Member, House of governance in Japan, JCIE convened a study Representatives, DPJ group of six members of the Diet from the REPOR The Successful Handling of the Financial Crisis Liberal Democratic, Democratic, and New , Member, House of

Komeito parties. Representatives, LDP ANNUAL Under the guidance of Professor Gerald Reform of Corporate Legislation Curtis of Columbia University, this group of Isamu Ueda, Member, House of Representatives, New JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 17 Policy-Oriented Research

The Transformation of Japanese The Emergence of NPOs and the Implications for Local Governance Communities and the Emerging Shigeru Tamura, Niigata University, Japan Local Agenda The rapid changes that have accompanied The Intellectual Infrastructure globalization and decentralization are forcing for East Asian Community- local governments to confront many new chal- Building (A Preliminary Survey) lenges. Under the direction of Shun’ichi Since the end of the cold war, new calls have Furukawa, a team of young scholars and think arisen for deeper and more substantive tank researchers was formed in 2000 to study regional cooperation, and in particular for the the new demands facing local government. establishment of cooperative institutions in Several workshops were held and a study trip East Asia that can harness shared values and to San Francisco was undertaken in March vision in order to meet critical regional and 2001 with the cooperation of the Public Policy global challenges. Recognizing the importance Institute of California (PPIC). The results of the of the development of an intellectual infra- study were published in Japanese in June 2002 structure that can serve as the backbone of as Jichitai henkaku no genjitsu to seisaku, and such a community and facilitate confidence- in English in April 2003 as Japan’s Road to building measures, JCIE undertook a prelimi- Pluralism. nary survey on the current state of the intellectual network within the East Asian Participants: region. JCIE staff visited and surveyed leading Decentralization in Japan policy research institutes in Indonesia, Shun’ichi Furukawa, Project Director, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Singapore, University of Tsukuba, Japan and South Korea. This project was commis- The Socioeconomic Impact of Community Business sioned by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Koji Kanagawa, Kyushu Institute of Japan in response to a proposal made by Technology, Japan Prime Minister Jun’ichiro Koizumi in Singapore Local Government and Resident Foreigners: in January 2002 for closer regional coopera- A Changing Relationship tion and a stronger Japan-ASEAN relationship. Chikako Kashiwazaki, Keio University, Japan

International Policies of Local Governments Toshihiro Menju, JCIE, Japan

T Think Tanks in a Changing Regional Environment

REPOR Madoka Nakamura, National Institute for Research Advancement, Japan Prospects for a Self-Sustainable Local Fiscal ANNUAL System Namiko Numao, Nihon University, Japan JCIE 2001–2003

18 • GLOBAL THINKNET

Support and Cooperation for Research and Dialogue

Trilateral Commission The 2002 regional meeting was held on The Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973, is November 22–24 in Singapore in preparation a nongovernmental forum of leading private for the 34th Plenary Meeting in Seoul in April citizens from Europe, North America, and 2003. Discussions at this gathering included Japan that aims to promote mutual under- the prospects of ASEAN, developments sur- standing and closer cooperation on common rounding North Korea, the impact of free trade problems facing these three major democratic, agreements on global and regional trading sys- industrialized regions of the world. The tems, and the perspectives of emerging Commission, which operates through three Chinese leaders on the future direction of regional secretariats, coordinates task forces China. Tharman Shanmugaratnam (senior min- on a variety of pressing issues in international ister of state ministry of trade & industry and affairs and meets in regional groups as well as education, Singapore) also addressed the gath- in an annual three-day plenary to discuss these ering on the theme of “What China Means for studies and to share perspectives on common a New Asia.” political, economic, and foreign policy chal- lenges. JCIE has served as the Japanese Council for Asia-Europe Secretariat since the Commission was estab- Cooperation (CAEC) lished and became the Pacific Asia Secretariat At the 1996 inaugural meeting of the Asia- in 2000, when the Commission expanded its Europe Meeting (ASEM)—a summit that brings membership beyond Japan to other Asian together the heads of state and government of countries, including a number of ASEAN Asian and European nations—the Japanese member nations, Australia, New Zealand, and government proposed that networks between South Korea. In addition, a number of leading research institutions in these two regions be individuals from mainland China, Hong Kong, strengthened through the establishment of a and Taiwan were invited to participate. forum for intellectual dialogue. As a result, the On November 30–December 1, 2001, the Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC) Pacific Asia Group held its second regional was created and, in the ensuing years, it has meeting in Hong Kong. Roughly 40 individu- helped shape the agenda for the ASEM als gathered to discuss a wide range of topics, process. CAEC is managed by a steering com- including regional perspectives on the impact mittee comprised of 12 research institutions in of September 11 on Asia Pacific and on the Asia and Europe. JCIE serves as the Asian sec-

global order; China and the international retariat while the Center for East Asian and T system; Islamic and trilateral countries in the Pacific Studies at Trier University in Germany era of globalization; and the coordination of is the European secretariat. REPOR the global trading regime and regional trade As part of the CAEC activities, three task

arrangements. This meeting was held in prepa- forces undertook studies on the themes of ANNUAL ration for the 33rd Plenary Meeting, which was “Migration,” “Comparing Experiences with held on April 6–8, 2002, in Washington, D.C. Post-Conflict State Building in Asia and JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 19 Support and Cooperation for Research and Dialogue

Europe: The Cases of East Timor, Bosnia, and mately 40 participants discussed UK-Japan Kosovo,” and “Unemployment: The East Asian relations, international affairs after September and European Experiences in Perspective.” 11, approaches to common challenges such as Findings and recommendations from these the provision of welfare and other public serv- three task forces were presented and dis- ices, and the contribution of technology to sus- cussed at the London Plenary Conference, tainable development. which was held on September 12–13, 2002. The 19th Group Conference was convened The conference also provided an occasion to in Kamakura, Japan, on February 14–16, 2003. discuss the policy messages that the CAEC Participants shared views on economic should convey to ASEM IV. On March 4–5, cooperation and developments in Asia and 2003, a small group of CAEC members met in Europe, the role of science and technology in Paris to review recent CAEC projects, consider future economic growth, and the potential for the direction of CAEC, and discuss potential cooperation between NGOs in both countries joint research projects. in addressing global challenges. They also met with Prime Minister Jun’ichiro Koizumi. UK-Japan 21st Century Group The UK-Japan 21st Century Group (formerly Korea-Japan Forum the UK-Japan 2000 Group) was launched in The Korea-Japan Forum was initiated in 1985 at the joint recommendation of British November 1993, during a summit meeting Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Japanese between South Korean President Kim Young- Prime Minister . It is a coali- sam and Japanese Prime Minister Morihiro tion of private-sector, public-sector, and civil Hosokawa where they called for the formation society leaders from both countries that aims of a new, forward-looking relationship to promote dialogue and cooperation between between the two countries. This continuing the two countries. Following each of the dialogue has played a critical role in promot- Group’s meetings, a summary report and rec- ing mutual understanding and expanding the ommendations are submitted to the prime network of cooperative relationships between ministers of both countries. JCIE serves as the the two countries. JCIE and the Korea secretariat in Japan and the Royal Institute of Foundation serve as the secretariats. International Affairs (Chatham House) in The ninth meeting of the Forum was held London acts as its British counterpart. on September 1–2, 2001, in Gangwon

T The 18th Group Conference was held on Province, Korea with approximately 50 lead- February 21–24, 2002, in Ditchley Park, UK, ers from the political, business, academic,

REPOR under the joint chairmanship of Yasuhisa media, and nonprofit sectors. Discussions Shiozaki (member, House of Representatives focused on domestic sociopolitical and eco-

ANNUAL and former parliamentary vice-minister for nomic developments in Japan and Korea, the finance) and the Rt. Hon. Peter Mandelson MP state of bilateral relations and the reconcilia- (member, House of Commons). Approxi- tion of historical grievances, security in JCIE 2001–2003

20 • GLOBAL THINKNET Support and Cooperation for Research and Dialogue

Northeast Asia, enhancing economic coopera- Fukuda, , addressed the tion, and ideas for the future. Forum at its opening dinner. On September 6–8, 2002, the tenth meeting The 11th Forum was held on March 5–7, of the Forum took place in Kanazawa, Japan. 2003, in Berlin, where the participants dis- Over 40 leaders from the political, nonprofit, cussed the obstacles to structural reform in academic, media, and corporate sectors dis- Japan and Germany, new security challenges cussed such topics as Korea-Japan exchange in East Asia, regionalism and bilateralism, and and cooperation after the 2002 World Cup, ways to cooperate with the United States in sociopolitical and economic developments in regards to the new challenges of global gov- both countries, the future of Korea-Japan eco- ernance. The group also met with Chancellor nomic cooperation, and the rise of China and Gerhard Schröder for an hour-long discussion. the future of the Asia Pacific region. Israel-Japan Intellectual German-Japanese Forum Exchange Program The German-Japanese Forum was created in The Israel-Japan Intellectual Exchange 1993, at the joint initiative of Japanese Prime Program was established by JCIE and the Van Minister and German Leer Jerusalem Institute in response to requests Chancellor Helmut Kohl, as a private, bilateral from the governments of Japan and Israel in dialogue designed to promote mutual co- 1993 to promote increased dialogue and operation and understanding. Following the exchange between the two countries. As part Group’s annual meetings, a joint statement is of the fifth exchange, seven intellectual lead- drafted for submission to the Japanese prime ers from Israel visited Tokyo on October 9–16, minister and the chancellor of Germany which 2001, for a series of meetings and briefings documents common challenges facing both with scholars, Diet members, diplomats, and countries and outlines recommendations for business leaders on Japan’s politics, economy, German-Japanese cooperative action. foreign policy, society, and culture. They also The 10th German-Japanese Forum was participated in two workshops, “Common held in Tokyo on February 2–4, 2002. More Challenges of Governance in a Global Era” and than 30 participants gathered to discuss five “The Middle East Peace Process: Views from major issues of concern to the two countries: Israel and Views from Japan.” Following their the political and economic consequences of program in Tokyo, they visited the Peace

the September 11 terrorist attacks for Japan and Memorial Park and Hiroshima Peace Memorial T Germany; the role of Germany and Japan in Museum to participate in a dialogue on “Israel- the future development of Central Asia; recent Hiroshima: Global Crisis and Challenges for REPOR developments in the global trading system and the Peace.” This dialogue included discussions

their consequences; the new frontier of eco- on the future of the peace process in the ANNUAL nomic development; and bilateral cooperation Middle East and the peace movement from the in intellectual and cultural exchange. Yasuo perspectives of Israel and Hiroshima. JCIE 2001–2003

GLOBAL THINKNET • 21 Support and Cooperation for Research and Dialogue

Japan Center for Asian Historical center, which took place in November of that Records—Commissioned year. Planning Research In 1994, Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama Workshop on Conflict and proposed the creation of a center for Japan- Development: Roles of JBIC Asia relations as a key component of the In cooperation with the Japan Bank for Peace, Friendship, and Exchange Initiative, International Cooperation (JBIC), JCIE organ- which was announced to mark the 50th ized a one-day conference in Tokyo on anniversary of the end of World War II. The January 29, 2003, which examined the poten- goal of the proposed center was to promote tial contributions of development assistance to “dialogue between Japan and the rest of Asia conflict prevention, peace-building, and recon- concerning modern history, and build a foun- struction. Presentations were given by JBIC dation for peaceful coexistence between Japan and Japan International Cooperation Agency and the world in the 21st century.” In 1996, (JICA) officers, government officials, and JCIE was asked by the Cabinet Councilor’s experts from the nonprofit and academic sec- Office on External Affairs to explore the feasi- tors. More than 130 attendees from related bility of establishing such a center. fields were on hand for the day’s seminars, From 1996 to 1999, JCIE conducted three which focused especially on Sri Lanka and initial studies for this purpose: a survey of Central Asia. similar collections in Europe, the United States, and Asia; a study focused on potential modalities for the operations of the center; and an evaluation of government records related to modern Japan-Asia relations held in four major government records deposito- ries. In November 1999, the cabinet officially decided to establish the Asia historical center by the end of FY2001, and accordingly, a preparatory office for the center was created within the Prime Minister’s Office in April 2000. JCIE’s involvement in 1999 and early

T 2000 consisted of a study that provided the preparatory office with basic information and

REPOR plans for the realization of the new center. In 2000, research teams provided extensive tech-

ANNUAL nical support for the information system sup- porting the center’s reference system, and in 2001, JCIE assisted with the opening of the JCIE 2001–2003

22 • GLOBAL THINKNET CIVILNET Developing Civil Society in Japan and Asia Pacific CIVILNET: Developing Civil Society in Japan and Asia Pacific

hrough its CivilNet Programs, JCIE continues its long tradition of leadership in pro- Tmoting the development of a vibrant civil society in Japan, Asia Pacific, and around the world. With more than three decades of experience in the field, JCIE finds itself in a unique position to create collaborative networks of civil society organizations worldwide and enhance cooperation among them in addressing common challenges. One top priority of the CivilNet Program is the promotion of a broader and deeper under- standing of civil society in Japan and around the world, particularly through research and dia- logue projects designed to contribute to an enhanced role for civil society organizations in the governance of society. For example, JCIE recently launched a groundbreaking study of the role of philanthropy in strengthening postwar U.S.-Japan relations. Other projects during FY2001 and FY2002 included seminars with civil society leaders, the translation of an educa- tional video series on grantmaking, and JCIE’s involvement in a study mission to the United States for grantmakers. In addition to these efforts, JCIE provides information on recent devel- opments in Japanese civil society through its publications program, most notably through its Civil Society Monitor newsletter. Another important thrust of CivilNet initiatives involves the active facilitation of philan- thropic programs in Japan and Asia Pacific on behalf of domestic and overseas foundations and corporations. JCIE has been on the cutting edge of activities in this area since the 1970s, for example, helping establish Japan’s first charitable trust based on general fundraising, the Asian Community Trust (ACT). Two decades later, in 1997, JCIE created one of the country’s first donor advised funds in cooperation with Levi Strauss & Co., in order to distribute small- scale grants in a flexible manner to Japanese NGOs in a variety of priority areas. In recognition of the increasingly active role of local communities and citizen’s organiza- tions in international networks, a third category of CivilNet activities involves the promotion of grassroots exchanges and projects that examine internationalization at the local level, par- ticularly the role of community-based initiatives and organizations. Through its cooperation with local governments, its Grassroots Network, and other similar activities, JCIE strives to foster cooperation between civil society leaders and local governments and to provide local

T civil society leaders in Japan with opportunities to engage in dialogues with their counter- parts in other countries. REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

24 • CIVILNET

Promoting Civil Society and Philanthrophy

The Role of Philanthropy in Conference Center of the Rockefeller Brothers Postwar U.S.-Japan Relations Fund. The 23 participants, a number of whom After World War II, philanthropy played a were active in U.S.-Japan philanthropy during critical, but often overlooked, role in driving the period of the study, shared their views the dramatic change in perceptions and values regarding the motivations of grantmakers, the that enabled two bitter foes, Japan and the influence of the cold war and anticommunist United States, to become the closest of allies. sentiment on Japan-related grantmaking, the JCIE is conducting a major study that examines relationship between the government and the long-term impact of foundations and indi- foundations, and the impact of American phi- vidual philanthropists, mainly in the United lanthropy on Japan’s intellectual community States but also including some in Japan, on the and the U.S.-Japan relationship. bilateral relationship. This project is designed A second workshop was held on November to fill gaps in the knowledge of U.S.-Japan rela- 19, 2002, at the International House in Tokyo, tions and shed light on the historic role of phi- Japan. Forty participants gathered at the day- lanthropy and civil society in international long meeting to discuss the experiences of relations. Japanese grantees in their dealings with Building on extensive archival research and American foundations as well as the role of U.S. interviews, the JCIE research team is examin- philanthropy in helping rebuild intellectual ties ing the motivations of foundation personnel, between Japan and the United States. Then, on the relationship between philanthropic activ- March 8–9, 2003, a small group of experts gath- ity and government policy, and the impact of ered for a third workshop in Cambridge, philanthropic support in areas such as U.S.- Massachusetts, to focus on the role of U.S. phi- Japan intellectual exchange projects, institu- lanthropy in promoting Japanese studies in the tion-building in Japan, Japanese studies in the United States and American studies in Japan. United States, and American studies in Japan. Project research is scheduled to continue This study group includes a team of in-house throughout 2003, and a final report is slated for researchers and outside experts such as Akira publication in 2004. Iriye (professor, Harvard University), Makoto Iokibe (professor, Kobe University), and GrantCraft—Japanese Masato Kimura (director of studies, Shibusawa Video Project Eiichi Memorial Foundation). In 2001, the Ford Foundation initiated a project

The project has included a series of work- entitled GrantCraft that collected the experi- T shops in the United States and Japan that ences of foundation program officers and explore various facets of philanthropic involve- other experts in a series of brief guides and REPOR ment in the bilateral relationship during the videos. Recognizing the value of these

critical period of 1945–75. On the weekend of materials as an educational resource for foun- ANNUAL October 12–13, 2002, JCIE held a workshop dation program officers as well as for general outside New York City at the Pocantico audiences interested in civil society, JCIE JCIE 2001–2003

CIVILNET • 25 Promoting Civil Society and Philanthrophy

cooperated with the Ford Foundation to create of ASEAN—Indonesia, Malaysia, the a Japanese-language version of the GrantCraft Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand—and two video series, selecting three episodes from the European countries—the United Kingdom and series that would be of particular value for Germany—were selected as target countries Japanese audiences and using them to create because they play host to extensive networks an hour-long Japanese-language videotape. At of Japanese business operations. Research in present, there is much discussion in Japan on Asia is focusing on NGOs in the fields of the fundraising and ways to increase financial sup- environment and education, and in Europe on port to NPOs, but little yet on the qualitative NGOs in the fields of the environment and aspects of funding. The introduction of the corporate social responsibility. GrantCraft series in Japan is seen as one way to help trigger debate on a series of issues Survey on the Status of related to effective grantmaking. Exchange Programs between As an initial step in the dissemination of the the U.S. and Japan GrantCraft video, it was presented at the 2003 JCIE was commissioned in 2002 by the annual meeting of the Japan NPO Research Ministry of Foreign Affairs to conduct a survey Association (JANPORA) in Nara on March on various exchange programs between the 14–16. Following this launch, the video is being United States and Japan as part of the com- showcased in other professional seminars and memoration of the 150th anniversary of workshops around Japan. Commodore Matthew C. Perry’s arrival in Japan. Areas covered by this survey included International Survey Project— sister-city relations, grassroots exchange, stu- The Civil Society Sector dent and youth exchange, exchange between and NGO Activities in Asia universities and graduate schools, intellectual and Europe exchange, and parliamentary exchange. A There is a growing awareness worldwide that survey report was compiled in Japanese and NGOs are becoming indispensable actors in submitted to the Foreign Ministry. the governance of societies around the world, and that they play a vital role both at the Seminar Series with domestic and international level. The Japan Civil Society Leaders Institute for Social and Economic Affairs JCIE periodically holds seminars and meetings

T (Keizai Koho Center) and JCIE, recognizing the with civil society leaders from around the need for healthy partnerships between the world in order to improve mutual understand-

REPOR business and civil society sectors, especially in ing of developments in civil society in Japan countries where Japanese corporations oper- and abroad and to promote the exchange of

ANNUAL ate, launched a survey of NGOs designed to views on best practices. On July 2–4, 2002, contribute to the building of sound cross- Buzz Schmidt, chairman and CEO of sectoral partnerships. Five member countries GuideStar, visited JCIE to conduct a series of JCIE 2001–2003

26 • CIVILNET Promoting Civil Society and Philanthrophy

seminars on issues of disclosure and trans- The participants visited ten organizations parency in the nonprofit sector. GuideStar gen- in Washington, D.C.; Williamsburg, Virginia; erates a free national online database of over and New York City to learn about their opera- 850,000 U.S. nonprofit organizations, listing tions, recent developments in the U.S. non- detailed information on each organization as profit sector concerning governance issues, well as providing access to their Form 990 internal governance, and organizational effec- financial reports. A number of discussions tiveness, and the social and legal frameworks were held with leading figures of Japanese affecting the governance of private philan- foundations and nonprofit organizations, as thropy in the United States. These organiza- well as businessmen involved in corporate phi- tions included foundations such as the lanthropy, and Diet members and others Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, the Ford engaged in national-level administrative reform Foundation, and the New York Community efforts. The seminar series provided an oppor- Trust; watchdog and evaluation institutions tunity for debate on the establishment of a such as the BBB Wise Giving Alliance and system of disclosure for Japanese civil society OMB Watch; research centers and organiza- organizations, which is critically needed to tions disseminating information on the enhance their transparency and governance. nonprofit sector such as GuideStar and the Other examples of seminars include a series National Center for Charitable Statistics; and of meetings and seminars on November 25–26, organizations engaged in consulting or 2002, which involved Rob Buchanan, director advocacy in regard to nonprofit governance of international programs for the U.S.-based issues such as BoardSource, the Council on Council on Foundations. Foundations, and the Peter F. Drucker Foundation. Study Mission on American Philanthropy Cooperation with the Asia On April 6–14, 2002, JCIE helped organize a Pacific Philanthropy study mission to the United States that was Consortium (APPC) sponsored by the Japan Association of The Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium, an Charitable Organizations (JACO), an organi- informal association of like-minded institu- zation established in 1972 to promote philan- tions, was created in 1994 with the primary thropic activities in Japan. The delegation, objective of increasing the flow and effective-

comprised of 16 executives from various ness of philanthropic giving within and to the T Japanese grantmaking organizations, was region. JCIE serves as the focal point in Japan formed to study effective means of promoting for coordinating APPC activities in Japan. The REPOR internal governance, accountability, and primary APPC activities in which JCIE was

transparency in Japanese foundations, parti- involved in FY2001 and 2002 included the ANNUAL cularly those classified as “public interest following: corporations.” JCIE 2001–2003

CIVILNET • 27

Promoting Civil Society and Philanthrophy

Strengthening Philanthropy in the Asia changing regulatory framework under current Pacific: An Agenda for Action legal and administrative reforms. Preliminary On July 16–17, 2001, the APPC convened an drafts were submitted at a writers’ workshop in international conference on “Strengthening Manila on January 9–10, 2003, and will be final- Philanthropy in the Asia Pacific: An Agenda for ized for publication in time for a September Action” in Bali, Indonesia. JCIE served as the 2003 conference, to be held again in Manila. logistical coordinator for the conference, which was attended by approximately 100 Bangladesh Freedom Foundation leaders from the Asia Pacific region represent- Board of Trustees Tokyo Observation ing the philanthropic, nonprofit, academic, and Visit corporate sectors. Participants gathered to dis- The Bangladesh Freedom Foundation (BFF) cuss issues such as the assessment of civil soci- engages in various initiatives that help create ety development in the region, innovations in an environment conducive to reviving and regional philanthropy, and the development strengthening philanthropy in Bangladesh, of corporate-philanthropy partnerships. The with specific emphasis on creating a support- conference determined priorities for the con- ive institutional and policy environment. tinued activities of APPC and outlined the - Through its association with the APPC, obser- essary steps to be taken on both the national vation visits were organized for a BFF and regional levels. delegation to three cities in Asia—Manila, Tokyo, and Bangkok—from May 6 to 16, 2001, Governance, Organizational to compare similar organizations in these Effectiveness, and the Nonprofit Sector countries, particularly in regard to the strategic The APPC is undertaking a study on planning of foundations and foundation-like “Governance, Organizational Effectiveness, and organizations. The Tokyo program included a the Nonprofit Sector” in response to recent seminar at JCIE on the emergence of civil soci- questions regarding the legitimacy of civil soci- ety and future challenges facing the sector, as ety organizations and the widely perceived well as visits to the Japan NPO Center, Palette need to develop mechanisms to improve their Volunteer Support Group, Keidanren (Japan internal governance, transparency, and Federation of Economic Organizations), and accountability. Twelve background papers from the Japanese NGO Center for International Australia, Bangladesh, China, Hong Kong, Cooperation (JANIC). In addition, a roundtable

T India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Pakistan, the seminar was organized for the participants by Philippines, Taiwan, and Thailand are being JCIE with Japanese foundations and NGO

REPOR developed. Tadashi Yamamoto, chair of this representatives. study project, will contribute an overview

ANNUAL paper, and JCIE staff are writing the paper for Japan that assesses the current state of internal governance of nonprofit organizations and the JCIE 2001–2003

28 • CIVILNET

Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Overseas Foundations and Corporations

Levi Strauss Foundation Advised FY 2001 Grants Fund of JCIE HIV/AIDS Prevention Levi Strauss & Co. has long been recognized Prevention programs for youth for its extremely active corporate philanthropy K Lounge (Tokyo) program, which provides support for various ¥1,000,000 causes not only in the United States but also in To support a K Lounge outreach project countries worldwide where it has offices and enabling a peer group of people with factories. In 1997, Levi Strauss & Co. joined HIV/AIDS to speak to school nurses, doctors, students, and others about their experiences. forces with JCIE to create one of the first donor advised funds in Japan. Under this arrange- Kawaguchi Children’s Network (Saitama) ¥370,000 ment, Levi Strauss Foundation provides a grant To organize an “AIDS Child Summit” for young to JCIE, which in turn redistributes the funds people involved in AIDS awareness and pre- to NGOs in Japan according to guidelines set vention programs. by the Levi Strauss Foundation. The fund is SHARE (Services for the Health in Asian & unique in the Japanese context because it pro- African Regions, Tokyo) vides institution-building support for new ¥1,000,000 organizations in their initial stages, allows more To develop an effective AIDS prevention pro- gram targeted at Japanese junior and senior flexibility than usual by providing the funds at high school students. the start of the project, and enables these Urban Health Projects (Osaka) groups to respond to emerging issues not yet ¥700,000 well recognized in the community. To develop an effective HIV/AIDS In keeping with the donor’s priorities, prevention/awareness program targeted at grants in FY2001 were offered in three areas: Osaka teenagers. HIV/AIDS prevention, social justice, and youth Others empowerment. In FY2001, 129 applications CHARM (Center for Health and Rights of were received and 21 organizations divided the Migrants, Osaka) ¥1,800,000 $169,400 fund as described below. In FY2002, To operate a center offering information and the 50th anniversary of the Levi Strauss counseling on HIV/AIDS and on health care for Foundation, new grant guidelines were set migrants and foreign residents. forth, with grants to be offered in three cate- JANAC (Japan Association of Nurses in AIDS gories: preventing the spread of HIV/AIDS, Care, Kanagawa) ¥500,000

increasing economic development opportu- T To create a handbook for nurses to enable nities, and ensuring access to education. them to provide appropriate advice and infor- REPOR Grants made in FY2001 are listed below. (A mation to people with HIV/AIDS. change in the annual schedule in FY2002 MASH Tokyo (Men and Sexual Health, Tokyo) shifted the call for applications to October ¥930,000 ANNUAL 2002, with the selection process scheduled to To implement an HIV/STD prevention and take place in July 2003.) awareness program for young men in Tokyo. JCIE 2001–2003

CIVILNET • 29

Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Overseas Foundations and Corporations

Social Justice Japan Association for Refugees (Tokyo) APARI (Asia-Pacific Addiction Research ¥2,000,000 Institute, Tokyo) To offer legal and social assistance to refugees ¥1,000,000 facing emergencies in Japan. To implement a drug-free training program for National Network in Solidarity with Migrant criminal defendants on bail to support their Workers (Tokyo) recovery and re-acceptance into society. ¥600,000 Center for Education and Support for Women, To strengthen the editorial organization and Japan (Tokyo) enrich the content of the monthly English ¥1,000,000 newsletter, “Migrant Network News.” To provide training for nurses coming in Youth Empowerment contact with sexual assault victims in order to promote more appropriate treatment of the Africa Global Link Project (Kanagawa) cases. ¥1,000,000 To hold an educational session in Japan Center for Prisoners’ Rights Japan (Kanagawa) between Japanese and African senior high ¥550,000 school students specializing in commerce, agri- To prevent the violation of prisoners’ human culture, and engineering. rights by providing legal counseling through correspondence. Fukuoka Toubu Kodomo Gekijo (East Fukuoka Children’s Theater Center, Fukuoka) Child Assault Prevention Center Japan (Hyogo) ¥650,000 ¥1,000,000 To operate a private classroom as a place for To hold workshops and form guidelines on the learning and play for primary and secondary prevention of violence and protection of chil- school age children who refuse to attend dren’s rights at institutions housing abused school. children. Kyoto Volunteer Center for Students (Kyoto) Clothesline Project Japan (Saitama) ¥650,000 ¥1,000,000 To develop a model training program led by To hold workshops on domestic violence for university students who will promote volunteer the general public, train volunteers, and exhibit activities among their peers. T-shirts with messages drawn by female victims of domestic violence. Mutual Aid “Ren” for Mental and Physical Development of Children (Tokyo) Filipino Migrants’ Center (Aichi) ¥1,400,000 ¥1,000,000 To provide professional training of “develop- To train individuals involved in community mental support staff” to assist in the education improvement, operate an income-generating and socialization of the learning disabled, internet cafe, and offer vocational training for autistic children, and those who refuse to go to the Filipino community in Nagoya. T school. Food Bank Japan (Tokyo) Volunavi Club (Hokkaido) REPOR ¥1,000,000 ¥850,000 To provide agricultural training for the home- To coordinate the needs of senior high school less in an effort to provide them with economic

ANNUAL students wishing to do volunteer work and and social independence. NPOs caring for the aged and the disabled that utilize volunteers. JCIE 2001–2003

30 • CIVILNET

Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Overseas Foundations and Corporations

“Positive Lives Asia” Photo Goldman Sachs Global Exhibition Tour Leaders Program As one of its community projects to promote The Goldman Sachs Global Leaders Program, HIV/AIDS awareness and education, the Levi an annual international competition, was Strauss Foundation has been supporting the launched in 2001 by the Goldman Sachs production of “Positive Lives Asia,” a series of Foundation to identify and reward the photo-documentary essays featuring the sto- academic achievement and leadership poten- ries of people affected by HIV and AIDS and tial of 100 of the most accomplished students positive responses to the epidemic. Positive at 54 designated top-ranked universities in 16 Lives was started by and continues to be man- countries and regions. The Institute of aged by the major British HIV charity, the International Education (IIE) administers the Terrence Higgins Trust, and the international program in partnership with the Foundation, photo documentary agency, Network and JCIE managed the competition in Japan in Photographers. JCIE served as the intermedi- FY2001 and FY2002. ary between the Levi Strauss Foundation and In 2001, the program’s initial year, eight the Positive Lives Committee, and the Japanese Japanese students were selected from four coordinator of the exhibitions, the Japan AIDS designated universities and each student & Society Association (JASA). JASA is an received a monetary award in recognition of umbrella organization established in 1990 to their outstanding achievements. Four out of address AIDS issues through joint efforts by the eight were also invited to attend the researchers, doctors, NGOs, journalists, and Global Leaders Institute held in New York on individuals affected by HIV. July 19–28, 2001. The 2001 Global Leaders The exhibition was displayed at a total of Institute gathered 50 students from around the 66 locations throughout Japan from February world for seminars on issues such as aspects to December 2002, and it was viewed by an of global leadership, e-commerce, and inter- estimated 30,000 people. Various local organ- national development. In 2002, eight students izations, including NGOs, local government from Japan were selected to receive the award, agencies, and schools, volunteered to spon- four of whom were invited to attend the sor the exhibitions, which were held in a Global Leadership Institute in New York on diverse set of venues, including community July 13–19, 2002. centers, schools, hospitals, and shopping

centers. T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

CIVILNET • 31

Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Overseas Foundations and Corporations

Lucent Global Science Scholars Program The Lucent Global Science Scholars Program was established by the Lucent Technologies Foundation in 1998 to encourage the world’s youth to pursue careers in information and communications technology. This annual com- petition rewards successful students with a one-time award of $5,000 and an invitation to the Global Summit, a week-long visit to Lucent Technologies’ world headquarters and Bell Labs in Murray Hill, New Jersey. The program was administered by the Institute of International Education (IIE), with JCIE serving as the competition manager for Japan in 2001 and 2002. In 2001, three univer- sity sophomores were selected from Japan to join approximately 100 Global Science Scholars from 22 countries at the Global Summit held on July 19–27. In 2002, two uni- versity sophomores were selected from Japan to join a group of 30 Global Science Scholars from 18 countries and regions around the world at the Global Summit held on July 19–25. T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

32 • CIVILNET

Civil Society and Grassroots-Level Exchanges

A50 Caravan planned an array of public lectures and dia- The year 2001 marked the 50th anniversary of logue sessions at Japan-America Societies, Japan’s formal readmission to international World Affairs Councils, universities, and other society with the signing of the San Francisco organizations. The Caravan was cut short by Peace Treaty on September 8, 1951. In order to the tragic events of September 11, although a reinforce the mutual trust between the United handful of teams completed much of their States and Japan and to express Japan’s appre- original itinerary. A50 Initiative: An Old ciation to the United States for its support Friendship for a New Century, a report on the during the postwar period, a group of private results of the caravan that includes reflections Japanese citizens initiated a project known as from the participants on their interaction with “A50.” The “A” stands for Appreciation and Americans both prior to and after September America, while “50” stands for the 50th 11, was published in 2002. anniversary of the Peace Treaty, the 50 American states, and the hopes for the next 50 Asia Pacific Leadership years. This initiative involved four major pro- Program in Tokyo gram activities: commemorative ceremonies, With JCIE as the local organizer, 24 participants a scholarship program, publications on the his- in the Asia Pacific Leadership Program (APLP) tory of postwar relations, and the A50 Caravan. visited Tokyo on May 25–June 1, 2002, for a JCIE’s offices in Tokyo and New York, program of dialogues with Japan’s emerging along with the National Association of Japan- political, business, and NGO leaders. This pro- America Societies (NAJAS) in Washington, gram, a certificate program of the East-West D.C., served as the secretariat for the A50 Center in Hawaii that is carried out in coopera- Caravan. Fifteen teams were selected, each tion with the University of Hawaii, is designed consisting of three members who represented to create a network of leaders from the United different generations and a broad spectrum of States, Asia, and the Pacific who are familiar professions and backgrounds, and each team with the issues and cultures of the region. was assigned a different route that would take While in Japan, the participants met with a it across the United States, from San Francisco, wide range of leaders, including Diet members through at least two additional cities, and Keizo Takemi and , Yuichi onwards to Washington, D.C. The Caravan Oba (assistant director, Aid Policy Division, began on September 8, 2001, with a com- Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Kazuyuki Kinbara

memorative ceremony in Japan. The partici- (deputy director, Keidanren), and Kensuke T pants then boarded a plane for San Francisco, Onishi (chief executive officer, Peace Winds where they attended a major conference Japan). Discussions were held on such issues REPOR organized by the Japan Society of Northern as Japan’s changing policy agenda, new actors

California. The following day, the 15 teams dis- in Japan’s domestic governance, the graying ANNUAL persed throughout the United States to visit 36 of society and changing welfare policies, and cities, where local host organizations had the role of media. JCIE 2001–2003

CIVILNET • 33

Civil Society and Grassroots-Level Exchanges

Grassroots Network University), Tetsuji Yasukawa (senior executive In an effort to keep pace with the proliferation director, The Asian-Pacific Children’s of local-level international activities in Japan, Convention in Fukuoka), and Yu Hwajoon JCIE launched the Grassroots Network section (director, Genkaijin Club). On July 16, 2002, of its Japanese website. Major grassroots JCIE organized a second symposium on organizations that are involved in international “International NGO Networks and Local Level activities are listed in the Grassroots Network Internationalization” with Shigeru Suganami database on a prefectural basis, and informa- (president, Association of Medical Doctors of tion on them can be searched by name, area, Asia International) as the keynote speaker, and or type of activities. The database is linked to a panel discussion with Kensuke Ohnishi (chief individual websites of the organizations, and executive officer, Peace Winds Japan), Michiya a list of organizational websites in 15 foreign Kumaoka (director, Japan International languages is also available. As part of its efforts Volunteer Center), Kaori Niizuma (chairperson, to build networks among these organizations, Futaro-no-mori Kikin), and Sakuyo Sugimoto JCIE has also begun to publish an electronic (director, Miyazaki International Volunteer monthly magazine, GrassNet, that reaches Center). more than 1,300 subscribers.

Miyazaki Prefecture Commemorative Symposiums on Internationalization Miyazaki Prefecture hosted the Foreign Ministers Meeting for the Kyushu-Okinawa Talks of the 2000 G-8 Summit. To follow up on this, with the cooperation of JCIE, Miyazaki Prefecture issued a three-year plan in 2001 for a series of symposiums that will commemorate the summit and take up the issue of interna- tionalization. JCIE was commissioned to organ- ize the first of these symposiums on July 12, 2001, on the theme of “Building Bridges to the

T World—Local Cultural and Arts Activities” at the Seagaia World Convention Center. The gather-

REPOR ing featured a keynote lecture by Hayao Kawai (executive academic advisor, Kyoto Bunkyo

ANNUAL University) as well as a panel discussion with Kenji Aoki (president, Miyazaki Prefectural Art Center), Soichiro Hasegawa (professor, Toyama JCIE 2001–2003

34 • CIVILNET POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM

POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM

he promotion of closer working relations between Japan’s leaders and their overseas T counterparts through political exchange has long been a core element of JCIE’s activi- ties. The Political Exchange Program dates back to 1968, when the first U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange brought eight Congressional members to Tokyo for an unprece- dented program of meetings and discussion sessions with leading Japanese political and social figures. In the ensuing years, JCIE broadened its programs, establishing additional exchanges for young political leaders from Japan and the United States (1973), for senior U.S. Congressional staff (1982), and for young Australian and Japanese political leaders (1991). To date, nearly 1,000 individual political leaders have taken part in one or more of these exchange programs. While the initial emphasis of these exchanges was generally on deepening mutual under- standing and building bilateral networks of leaders, dramatic changes in the international and domestic environment have encouraged JCIE to increasingly stress the objective of offering political leaders the opportunity for dialogue on common challenges. This evolution has been accompanied by a significant expansion in the role of Japanese politicians in policymaking that has made political exchange even more meaningful. Also, in response to the growing needs of political leaders for broader networks and new sources of information, JCIE has further expanded its programs to include frequent study meetings for Diet members with visiting foreign leaders and other experts. It has also increas- ingly involved political leaders in many of its study and dialogue projects, particularly the younger generation of Diet members and other politicians who are now gaining influence and who have limited experience with substantive international exchange and dialogue. T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

36 • POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program

U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program cials spoke with the delegation about Japan’s foreign policy, U.S.-Japan relations, and The U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange regional security issues. In addition, Economy Program was initiated in 1968, making it the Minister Heizo Takenaka, senior Ministry of longest-running exchange of its kind. The Economy and Trade (METI) officials, and sev- annual weeklong exchange visits of Japanese eral Japanese corporate leaders and entrepre- and American parliamentary delegations at the neurs met with the delegates to discuss Japan’s core of this program typically consist of a economic outlook and issues related to infor- series of high-level meetings, briefings, and mation technology. One of the high points of working sessions with leaders from diverse the program was a public symposium, cospon- sectors of society. In response to the evolving sored by the Japan Institute for Social and needs of political leaders, this program has Economic Affairs (Keizai Koho Center), where continued to become more substantive in the delegates shared their views with an audi- nature, shifting in focus from purely bilateral ence of almost 200 opinion leaders in a lively relations to the regional and global role of the panel discussion on “Political and Economic U.S.-Japan partnership. For example, in 1997, Developments in the United States after JCIE initiated the Joint Parliamentary Study and September 11.” Dialogue Project on U.S.-Japan Security Relations in Asia Pacific in order to promote a Participants: deeper understanding of the bilateral security Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA) relationship among members of Congress and Rep. Bob Etheridge (D-NC) the Diet. Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) 25th U.S. Congressional Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) Delegation to Japan Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) The six members of the 25th U.S. Congressional Delegation visited Japan on March 24–30, 2002, Study Group for Young and exchanged views with over 30 Diet mem- Members of the Diet bers, including the top leaders of the three Since 1997, as part of the Joint Parliamentary largest political parties— (sec- Study and Dialogue Project on U.S.-Japan retary-general of the Liberal Democratic Party), Security Relations in Asia Pacific, JCIE has

Naoto Kan (secretary-general of the organized multiparty study groups of young, T Democratic Party of Japan), and Tetsuzo emerging Diet members that meet with lead-

Fuyushiba (secretary-general of the New ing foreign experts from the fields of REPOR Komeito)—as well as former Prime Minister academia, policy, government, business, and

Tsutomu Hata. U.S. Ambassador Howard media in order to enhance their understanding ANNUAL Baker, Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi, and of international affairs. In FY2001 and FY2002, high-ranking Ministry of Foreign Affairs offi- meetings were held with such notable leaders JCIE 2001–2003

POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM • 37

U.S.-Japan Congressional Staff Exchange Program

as Ambassador Howard Baker (former U.S. staffers from almost all of the major Japanese Senate majority leader; former White House parties. The discussion focused on similarities chief of staff), William Cohen (former U.S. sec- and differences in the U.S. and Japanese leg- retary of defense), Ambassador Thomas Foley islative policy advice systems. In addition, they (former ambassador to Japan; former speaker served as speakers for a panel discussion on of the U.S. House of Representatives), political and economic development in the Ambassador Richard Haass (State Department United States after September 11. The event, policy planning director), and Ezra Vogel (pro- which was cosponsored with the Japan fessor, Harvard University). Institute for Social and Economic Affairs (Keizai Koho Center), attracted an audience of U.S.-Japan Congressional Staff more than 200 political, business, and NGO Exchange Program leaders. In recognition of the vital role that Congressional staff play in the U.S. legislative Participants: and policy processes, JCIE established the U.S. Deana Funderburk, Policy Assistant to House Congressional Staff Exchange in 1982 with the Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-TX) intention of helping them gain a greater under- Mandy Kenney, Deputy Legislative Director to Representative Mike Thompson (D-CA) standing of Japan’s policymaking process and Brian MacDonald, Chief of Staff to the current social, political, and economic Representative Greg Walden (R-OR) trends. The participants, typically senior staff Erik Raven, Legislative Assistant to Senator in the fields of security, economics, and for- Robert C. Byrd for Foreign Policy, Defense, eign policy, take part in an intensive one-week and Veterans (D-WV) study program that involves meetings and Ronald Reese, Director of External Affairs to briefings with a wide range of experts. Over Chairman John Boehner (R-OH) its two-decade history, 127 staffers serving Todd Rosenblum, Legislative Assistant to Congressional members from both parties Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) have visited Japan on this program, bringing Lawrence Willcox, Tax Counsel to Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) their heightened understanding of the U.S.- Japan relationship and the politics of Japanese policymaking back to their work in the U.S. Congress.

T Seven participants in the 17th U.S. Congressional Staff Exchange visited Tokyo

REPOR during the week of February 17–24, 2002. Highlights of their visit included a meeting

ANNUAL with Minister , head of the Defense Agency, and a roundtable discus- sion—the first of its kind—with 21 Diet policy JCIE 2001–2003

38 • POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program

U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program Kagawa prefecture for a series of meetings and briefings from leaders such as Taku Yamasaki Since 1973, the U.S.-Japan Young Political (secretary-general of the Liberal Democratic Leaders Exchange Program has been jointly Party) and Okayama Governor Masahiro Ishii. operated by JCIE and the American Council of In June 2002, members of the 17th Young Political Leaders (ACYPL). This inten- Japanese delegation were briefed on sive two-week study program is designed to Congressional operations by Representative expose young political leaders from each Greg Walden (R-OR), a 1991 delegate, and dis- country to the political, social, and economic cussed U.S.-Japan relations with prominent conditions of the other country, enhance their Japan expert Ezra Vogel (professor emeritus, understanding and appreciation of U.S.-Japan Harvard University) during the course of their relations, and create personal networks among travels through Washington, D.C., Boston, the two nations’ leaders. In addition to visiting Montana, and San Francisco. the host nation’s capitol for meetings with A reciprocal American delegation then trav- national leaders, participants travel to at least eled to Tokyo, Hachioji, Nagoya, and Kyoto two additional cities to gain a more diverse over the course of a two-week visit that perspective on the host country. During the included meetings with 13 Diet members, a course of the program, delegates meet with a lunch with former U.S. Speaker of the House wide range of senior government officials, Tom Foley, and a roundtable discussion with political party representatives, industry exec- Diet policy staff on the role of legislative staff utives, and community leaders. American del- in the policymaking process. The participants egates typically include state and local elected also served as speakers at a public panel dis- officials as well as staff members, and equal cussion on the U.S. midterm elections before numbers of Democrats and Republicans are an audience of more than 100 opinion leaders. selected each year. The Japanese delegates pri- marily consist of Diet staffers and prefectural 16th Japanese Delegation to the U.S. and local elected officials from the ruling and (April 22–May 3, 2001) opposition parties. Masayuki Chikazawa, Assistant to From April 22 to May 3, 2001, an eight- Representative Motohisa Furukawa member delegation from Japan visited Naoki Furukawa, Yokohama City Council Washington, D.C., Oklahoma, and southern Keiko Hirata, Utazu Town Council Aki Nagao, Japan Initiative

California, meeting with Congressional mem- T bers and state legislators as well as a diverse Keiichi Oda, Okayama Prefectural Assembly group of local leaders, including representa- Akira Ohmatsu, Komei Shimbun REPOR tives of the Chicksaw Nation and nonprofit Hideaki Takeuchi, House of Councillors Members’ Caucus Deputy Manager executives involved in promoting electronic ANNUAL Yasuji Yamaoka, LDP Professional Staff government. Later in the year, nine American Member, Party Organization Bureau leaders visited Tokyo, Okayama, and rural JCIE 2001–2003

POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM • 39

U.S.-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program

20th U.S. Delegation to Japan Yaeko Machida, Professional Staff Member, (November 4–15, 2001) Election Strategy Headquarters (LDP) Charles Dusseau, Delegation Leader, Yoshiki Minezaki, Assistant to Naoki Chairman of the Miami-Dade Democratic Minezaki, Member of the House of Party (Democrat) Councillors (DPJ) Sailaja Cherukuri, Deputy Director, Toshihiro Usami, Professional Staff Member, Legislative and Regulatory Review for the Party Organization Bureau (LDP) California State Department of Consumer Affairs (Democrat) 21st U.S. Delegation to Japan Gabriele Forsyth, Director of Operations, (November 9–22, 2002) National Republican Congressional Andrew Ketchings, Delegation Leader, Committee (Republican) Member, Mississippi House of H. Renee Howell, Director of Federal Affairs, Representatives (Republican) Brandon Associates, LLC, Boston Vanessa Kraemer, Program Officer, (Republican) American Council of Young Political Colleen M. Jordan, Member, City Council of Leaders (Democrat) Redwood City, California (Republican) Thomas McCarthy, Member, City Council, Neal Morrison, Member, Alabama House of Bridgeport, Connecticut (Democrat) Representatives (Democrat) Damon Porter, Chief of Staff, Office of the Andrea Nuciforo, Member, Massachusetts Speaker of the House, State of Missouri State Senate (Democrat) (Democrat) Gene Ransom, Executive Board Member of Kasim Reed, Member, Georgia House of the Maryland Democratic Party Representatives (Democrat) (Democrat) Jennifer Cowen, District Director, Office of Corey Stapleton, Member, Montana State Congressman Ed Royce, California Senate (Republican) (Republican) Howard Mills, Member, New York State 17th Japanese Delegation to the U.S. Assembly (Republican) (June 15–28, 2002) Robert Stivers, Member, Commonwealth of Shuhei Chiba, Member, Hachioji City Kentucky Senate (Republican) Council, Tokyo, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) Keiko Iizuka, Professional Staff Member, Public Relations Committee (DPJ) Takeo Iwaki, Assistant Chief, Political News

T Division, Komei Shimbun (New Komeito) Michiko Kobayashi, Assistant to Shozo REPOR Azuma, Member of the House of Representatives, Liberal Party

ANNUAL Yuki Kono, Assistant to , Member of the House of Representatives, Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) JCIE 2001–2003

40 • POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program

Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program the week, they moved from Tokyo to Miyazaki Prefecture to discuss a variety of issues of In 1991, JCIE and the Australian Political common concern with local leaders, includ- Exchange Council launched the Australia- ing the outbreak of bovine spongiform Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange encephalopathy (mad-cow disease). A recip- Program in order to build a network among rocal Japanese delegation visited Canberra and the next generation of leaders in both coun- Sydney in February 2003, where the partici- tries and promote bilateral dialogue. In the first pants exchanged views on security policy 13 years of the program, 161 participants have toward Iraq and North Korea with Australian visited their counterparts’ country for briefings cabinet ministers and senior leaders from a and discussions with political, business, non- variety of sectors. profit, and opinion leaders. The 11th Australian delegation visited Japan 11th Australian Delegation to Japan from May 27 to June 5, 2001, holding discus- (May 27–June 5, 2001) sions in Tokyo with some of Japan’s leading Christopher Pyne, MP, Delegation Leader, political figures, including Taku Yamasaki Federal Member for Sturt, South Australia (Liberal Party) (secretary-general of the Liberal Democratic Gerald Anderson, Member of the National Party), and (chief represen- Party Central Council; Accounting tative of the New Komeito Party). They then Financial Manager, Commonwealth traveled to Kobe, where they studied the city’s Treasury (National Party) recovery plan after the 1995 Great Hanshin- Christine Briton, Executive Officer, Awaji Earthquake. The Australian delegation Australian Political Exchange Council visit was followed later in the year by the visit Diane Brown, Policy Adviser to Senator of five Diet members to Sydney and Canberra Stephen Conroy; Federal Shadow Minister for Financial Services and Regulation to meet with a wide range of leaders, includ- (Australian Labor Party) ing Alexander Downer, MP (minister for for- Margaret Keech, MP, Queensland Member eign affairs), Neil Andrew (speaker of the for Albert (Australian Labor Party) House of Representatives), John Anderson, MP Nerina Lewis, Vice President of Winthrop (deputy prime minister and leader of the Branch of the Liberal Party (Liberal Party) National Party), and John Faulkner (leader of Mark McGowan, MLA, Western Australia the opposition in the Senate). Member for Rockingham (Australian Labor Party)

In the summer of 2002, a seven-member T Michael Quinlivan, President of Subiaco Australian delegation traveled to Japan and met Branch of the Liberal Party; Director of REPOR with numerous Diet members, including the Transaction Services, Pricewaterhouse- top leadership of the major political parties, Coopers (Liberal Party)

for briefings on Japanese politics and discus- Jacklyn Trad, Policy Adviser to the ANNUAL sions of foreign policy, common security Queensland Minister for Education (Australian Labor Party) issues, and shared social challenges. Later in JCIE 2001–2003

POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM • 41

Australia-Japan Young Political Leaders Exchange Program

9th Japanese Delegation to Australia Koji Matsui, Member, House of Councillors (August 5–12, 2001) (DPJ) Hiroyuki Sonoda, Delegation Leader, Yoichi Miyazawa, Member, House of Member, House of Representatives (LDP) Representatives (LDP) Motohisa Furukawa, Member, House of Masamitsu Naito, Member, House of Representatives (DPJ) Councillors (DPJ) Taro Kono, Member, House of Osamu Yamauchi, Member, House of Representatives (LDP) Representatives (DPJ) Seiji Maehara, Member, House of Representatives (DPJ) Hakubun Shimomura, Member, House of Representatives (LDP)

12th Australian Delegation to Japan (July 28–August 6, 2002) Catherine King MP, Delegation Leader, Federal Member for Ballarat (Australian Labor Party) Brer Adams, Adviser to the South Australian Minister for Environment and Conservation (Australian Labor Party) Andrew Bibb, Campaign and Policy Manager, Queensland National Party (National Party) Michael Keenan, Adviser to the Federal Minister for Family and Community Services (Liberal Party) John-Paul Langbroek, Chairman of Surfers Paradise Branch (Liberal Party) Chris Pearce MP, Federal Member for Aston (Liberal Party) Rita Saffioti, Principal Policy Adviser to the Premier of Western Australia (Australian Labor Party)

T 10th Japanese Delegation to Australia

REPOR (February 9–14, 2003) , Delegation Leader, Member, House of Representatives (LDP) ANNUAL Yasushi Kaneko, Member, House of Representatives (LDP) JCIE 2001–2003

42 • POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM

PUBLICATIONS T REPOR ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

43 • PUBLICATIONS AND DISSEMINATION PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE • 43

Publications

Asia Pacific Security Outlook 2001 Asia Pacific Security Outlook Christopher A. McNally and Charles E. 1997–2001 (CD-ROM) Morrison, eds. Richard W. Baker, Christopher A. Asia Pacific Security Outlook presents the McNally, and Charles E. Morrison, eds. national views of 20 of the 23 member coun- This collection of Asia Pacific Security Outlook tries of the ASEAN Regional Forum with editions from 1997 to 2001, presented on a regard to regional security, key defense issues, Windows/Macintosh hybrid CD-ROM, offers and each country’s contribution to regional readers a new format for reviewing and and global security. Written by a multinational researching the salient security issues in the team of security experts, the 2001 edition of region at the close of the last century. The five Outlook analyzes the evolving security chal- original print editions of the Outlook are repro- lenges facing Asia Pacific during the duced in their entirety, and chapters have been 2000–2001 period. Topics covered include newly grouped into searchable collections on such positive developments as the dramatic each of the countries surveyed. summit between the leaders of North and (English: JCIE, 2001) South Korea in June 2000, as well as such worrying trends as the resurgent socio- Asian Reflections on a New World political instability in several countries, after 9-11 notably Indonesia. Asian Reflections compiles six presentations (English: JCIE, 2001) on the prospects of Asia Pacific and the world order after September 11 that were prepared Asia Pacific Security Outlook 2002 for the November 2001 Global ThinkNet Christopher A. McNally and Charles E. Conference. It places particular emphasis on Morrison, eds. the role of think tanks and public intellectuals In the wake of September 11, this edition of the in shaping the regional impact of the terrorist Asia Pacific Security Outlook examines recent attacks and their aftermath. Asia-Pacific security trends, particularly efforts (English: JCIE, 2002) to combat international terrorism, changes in major power relationships, and increasing con- China-Japan-U.S. Relations: Meeting cerns over terrorism. The book also highlights New Challenges several fundamental issues affecting the Morton I. Abramowitz, Funabashi Yoichi, regional security landscape, such as sensitivi- and Wang Jisi, eds. T ties in U.S.-China relations, the evolving In an important follow-up to their pioneering

REPOR regional role of Japan, controversy over the 1996 assessment, China-Japan-U.S.: Managing Bush administration’s pursuit of missile the Trilateral Relationship, leading policy defense, instability in Indonesia, and the situ- experts from each of the three countries ANNUAL ation on the Korean peninsula. review the underlying challenges confronting (English: JCIE, 2002) the development of this vital triangle. Along JCIE 2001–2003

44 • PUBLICATIONS

Publications

with dramatic changes in the international Cross-Sectoral Partnerships in environment in recent years, Asia Pacific has Enhancing Human Security: seen new developments such as the phenom- Third Intellectual Dialogue on enal economic growth of China. Also, con- Building Asia’s Tomorrow, Bangkok, cerns have grown in Asia about more June 2000 pronounced American unilateralism, while Cross-Sectoral Partnerships reports on a June uncertainty lingers on the Korean peninsula 2000 conference that was convened to exam- and in China’s relationship with Taiwan. This ine the potential contributions of cross-sectoral volume offers indispensable insights on the cooperation to human security. The report evolving complexities of the China-Japan-U.S. focuses on the environment and regional cross- relationship in the context of this changing sectoral cooperation in Asia, social investment environment. and social safety nets in Asia, the role of civil (English: JCIE, 2002) society in enhancing human security in Asia, and methods to promote more effective cross- Containing Conflict: Cases in sectoral partnerships. It also includes case stud- Preventive Diplomacy ies on the environment, social investment, and Sato Hideo, ed. the impact of civil society. In the wake of the cold war, the international (English: JCIE and ISEAS, 2002; Japanese: community has faced a sudden increase in Sekutaa wo koeta paatonaashippu, JCIE and regional conflicts, and the need to strengthen ISEAS, 2002) peacekeeping mechanisms and to prevent and resolve conflicts has emerged as a major item A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe on the international agenda. In this volume, Dialogue—New Visions and five Japanese experts examine such topics as Perspectives for Women and Men post-conflict peacebuilding; the principle of Delfin Colome, Yoriko Meguro, and self-determination and ethnic conflict; and the Tadashi Yamamoto, eds. connection between human rights, democra- A product of the “A Gender Agenda: Asia- tization, and preventive diplomacy. By analyz- Europe Dialogue” project, cosponsored by the ing the international community’s responses Asia-Europe Foundation and JCIE, this publi- to conflicts in the African Great Lakes region, cation reports on the project’s first conference, the Balkans, and Southeast Asia, the authors held in 2001 in Chiba, Japan. The conference draw lessons for managing regional conflict gathered women and men with various back- through preventive diplomacy. grounds from throughout Asia and Europe to T (English: JCIE, 2003) discuss gender issues with the aim of defining REPOR the common challenges facing Asia and Europe and exploring suitable social and eco- ANNUAL nomic systems for women and men in a changing environment. JCIE 2001–2003

PUBLICATIONS • 45 Publications

(English: Asia-Europe Foundation and JCIE, experts respond with insights from American 2001; Japanese: Guroobaruka to jendaa, Asia- experiences with governance reform. Europe Foundation and JCIE, 2002) (English: JCIE, 2002)

Governance and Civil Society in a Guidance for Governance: Comparing Global Age Alternative Sources of Public Policy Tadashi Yamamoto and Kimberly Gould Advice Ashizawa, eds. R. Kent Weaver and Paul B. Stares, eds. A changing global environment has opened Traditionally, government bureaucracies have the way for civil society to play an expanded been the primary source of public policy ini- and more active role in systems of governance, tiatives and recommendations, but today grow- both domestically and internationally. Few ing challenges to governance have made analyses exist, however, of the comparative alternative or nongovernmental sources advantages and limitations of civil society in increasingly important. In this volume, experts meeting these new challenges. This volume from Brazil, Germany, India, Japan, the examines the nexus between governance and Republic of Korea, Poland, the United civil society in China, France, Germany, Kingdom, and the United States offer compar- Hungary, India, Israel, the Republic of Korea, ative assessments of the state of policy advice and Thailand. Authors from each of these coun- from such alternative sources as independent tries discuss the current state of civil society in scholarly think tanks, interest and advocacy their country, the challenges facing institutions centers, party think tanks, blue-ribbon com- of governance, the current debate on the need missions, and legislative support organizations. to reform domestic governance, and the evo- (English: JCIE, 2001) lution of the role of civil society in governance. Health and Human Security: Moving (English: JCIE, 2001) from Concept to Action—Fourth Governance for a New Century: Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Japanese Challenges, American Tomorrow, Kisarazu, March 2002 Experience Health and Human Security reports on the Thomas E. Mann and Sasaki Takeshi, eds. March 2002 Kisarazu Conference that took up Focusing on the volatile period of Japanese three case studies on the provision of primary politics since the burst of the bubble economy health care for the underprivileged in East Asia.

T in the 1990s, this volume discusses Japanese The publication explores how the concept of public opinion, political finance, party politics, human security can be a useful framework for REPOR and the reform of legislative and policymak- policy formulation and provide a basis for ing institutions. Five Japanese scholars and international cooperation and multisectoral

ANNUAL practitioners describe the efforts underway in partnership. Japan to restructure its electoral and govern- (English: JCIE, 2002; Japanese: Hoken iryo to ing processes, and five American policy hyuuman sekyuriti, JCIE, 2002) JCIE 2001–2003

46 • PUBLICATIONS

Publications

Major Power Relations in Northeast Vision of Asia Pacific in the Twenty- Asia: Win-Win or Zero-Sum Game first Century: Asia Pacific Agenda David M. Lampton, ed. Project, Cebu Forum 2001 In this volume, six experienced American ana- (The JCIE Papers: 35) lysts examine challenges to productive and This conference report offers the insights of a peaceful relations among China, Japan, and multinational team of promising young schol- the United States. These issues include the ars on the future of the Asia Pacific region. It status of Taiwan, the Japan-U.S. security includes a review of recent regional develop- alliance, the absence of genuine Sino-Japanese ments, considers a new vision for Asia Pacific reconciliation after the World War II era, in the 21st century, and addresses the question defense technologies, trilateral economic of how best to integrate new members of cooperation, and the Korean peninsula. ASEAN into the Asia Pacific community and (English: JCIE, 2001) into the international community at large. (English: JCIE/APAP Project, 2001) Policymaking in Japan: Defining the Role of Politicians Civil Society Monitor Gerald L. Curtis, ed. JCIE’s Civil Society Monitor newsletter serves The struggle between politicians and bureau- as one of the only sources of English-language crats for control over public-policy decision information on the current state of the making is displaying a particular intensity in Japanese nonprofit sector. It seeks to link Japan as the bureaucracy finds itself under attack Japan’s nonprofit sector with the international for its policy failures and as the political party community by reporting on current events and system undergoes fundamental change. noteworthy activities and organizations in Following an overview by Professor Gerald L. Japan’s emerging civil society. Curtis, this unique volume offers the perspec- tives of six Diet members from the Liberal Dialogue and Research Monitor Democratic, Democratic, and New Komeito par- JCIE served as a collaborator in the “Dialogue ties who represent a new generation of legisla- and Research Monitor” project, which offered tors. Each author provides their insights on the a compilation of information on recent gov- role that politicians play in the policy process, ernmental (“track one”) and nongovernmen- focusing on a specific policy issue, such as bank- tal (“track two”) meetings and research related ing system reform, education, and reform of the to Asia Pacific security issues. Under the direc- government’s huge public works programs. tion of Paul Evans (University of British T

(English: JCIE, 2002; Japanese: Seijika no Columbia), the Monitor was distributed as REPOR yakuwari: seiji shudo wo seiji no genba kara hard copy and through a listserve, and is avail- tou, JCIE, 2002) able on the JCIE website. In February 2003, the ANNUAL final installment of the series was published. JCIE 2001–2003

PUBLICATIONS • 47

APPENDICES

Contributing Organizations and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan Individuals—FY2001–FY2002 Mitsubishi Corporation Miyazaki 21st Century Strategy Promotional Contributions and Grants to Foundation JCIE/Japan Jiro Murase ‘00 Journalists Mission to Korea National Archives of Japan ‘01 Journalists Mission to Korea NEC Corporation All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. Nifco, Inc. Asahi Koma Law Offices Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Asia-Europe Foundation NTT DoCoMo, Inc. The Asia Foundation Okumura Sangyo Co., Ltd. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. Petroleum Association of Japan Decision Systems, Inc. Prime Minister’s Office, Japan Dentsu Inc. Rockefeller Foundation East-West Seminar Sasakawa Peace Foundation The Federation of Electric Power Companies Seiko Corporation Ford Foundation Shincho Bungei Shinkokai Fuji Research Institute Corporation Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Skylark Co., Ltd. IBM Japan, Ltd. Sony Corporation Institute of International Education Suzuyo & Co., Ltd. Itochu Corporation The Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. Japan Foundation Asia Center Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd. Japan Foundation Center for Global Toyota Motor Corporation Partnership Ushio, Inc. Japanese Government Grant Yazaki Corporation Japan International Cooperation System Kajima Corporation Contributions and Grants to Keizai Koho Center (Japan Institute for Social JCIE/USA

T and Economic Affairs) Akros Pharma, Inc. Kikkoman Corporation

REPOR Bingham McCutchen Murase Levi Strauss Foundation Chevron Corporation Master Foods, Ltd., a subsidiary of Mars, Inc.

ANNUAL Daiichi Pharmaceutical Corporation USA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Fairfield-Maxwell, Ltd. Matsushita Audio Visual Education Foundation JCIE 2001–2003

48 • APPENDICES

APPENDICES

Freeman Foundation Yuzaburo Mogi President and CEO, William E. Franklin Kikkoman Corporation Robert D. Haas Yoshio Okawara Japan Foundation Center for Global President and Executive Director, Institute for Partnership International Policy Studies J.C.C. Fund of the Japanese Chamber of Masahide Shibusawa Commerce and Industry (J.C.C.I.) of New President, Shibusawa Eiichi Memorial York, Inc. Foundation Master Foods, Ltd., a subsidiary of Mars, Inc. Jiro Ushio David Rockefeller Chairman and CEO, Ushio, Inc.

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund JCIE/Japan Auditor Rockefeller Foundation Toyoo Gyohten Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA President, The Institute for International The Starr Foundation Monetary Affairs Takeda America, Inc. JCIE/Japan Board of Counselors United States-Japan Foundation Yamanouchi USA Foundation Ronald J. Anderson Chairman, AIG Companies, Japan and Korea Board Members and Officers Shinji Fukukawa (as of September 2003) Executive Advisor, Dentsu Inc. Glen S. Fukushima President and CEO, Cadence Design Systems, JCIE/Japan Board of Directors Japan Tadashi Yamamoto Carlos Ghosn President, Japan Center for International President and CEO, Nissan Motor Company, Exchange Ltd. Isao Amagi Taizo Hashida (through March 2002) Director General, Institute of Higher Advisor, The Fuji Bank, Ltd. Education Reijiro Hattori (through March 2002) Kunitake Ando Chairman, Seiko Corporation President & Chief Operating Officer, Sony Corporation Gaishi Hiraiwa Councilor, Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd.

Hideko Katsumata T Managing Director and Executive Secretary, Nobuyuki Idei Chairman and CEO, Sony Corporation

Japan Center for International Exchange REPOR Yotaro Kobayashi Toru Kusukawa (through March 2002) Chairman and CEO, Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Senior Councilor, Fuji Research Institute Corporation ANNUAL JCIE 2001–2003

APPENDICES • 49

APPENDICES

Minoru Makihara Peter Geithner Chairman, Mitsubishi Corporation Consultant Yoshihiko Miyauchi Yotaro Kobayashi Chairman and Group CEO, Orix Corporation Chairman and CEO, Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Kichisaburo Nomura Minoru Makihara Chairman, All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. Chairman, Mitsubishi Corporation Norio Oga (through August 2003) Yuzaburo Mogi Honorary Chairman, Sony Corporation President and CEO, Kikkoman Corporation Toshiaki Ogasawara Charles E. Morrison Chairman, Nifco, Inc. President, East-West Center Shijuro Ogata Jiro Murase Former Executive Director, Bank of Japan Managing Partner, Bingham McCutchen Murase Takeo Shiina Senior Advisor, IBM Japan, Ltd. Toshiaki Taguchi President, Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Atsushi Shimokobe Chairman, Office Shimokobe Tadashi Yamamoto President, Japan Center for International Tasuku Takagaki Exchange Senior Advisor, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. Shoichiro Toyoda JCIE/USA Officers Honorary Chairman, Toyota Motor Corporation Tadashi Yamamoto Seiki Tozaki (through March 2002) Chairman Special Advisor, Itochu Corporation Jiro Murase Mikiko Yamazaki President Director, Tokyo Voluntary Action Center James Gannon JCIE/USA Board of Trustees Secretary and Treasurer Peggy Blumenthal Staff and Associates Vice President for Educational Services, (as of September 2003) Institute of International Education Gerald L. Curtis JCIE/Japan Professor of Political Science, Columbia University President Thomas S. Foley Tadashi Yamamoto

T North American Chairman, Trilateral Managing Director and Executive Secretary Commission; former U.S. Ambassador to Hideko Katsumata

REPOR Japan; former Speaker of the U.S. House of Chief Program Officers Representatives Satoko Itoh William E. Franklin Toshihiro Menju ANNUAL President, Franklin International Ltd.; Makito Noda President, Pacific Forum Jun Wada JCIE 2001–2003

50 • APPENDICES APPENDICES

Senior Program Officers Senior Research Associate Shohei Muta (through March 2002) Yoshitaro Fuwa Kyoko Shimizu Senior Fellow Hifumi Tajima Koji Watanabe Program Officers Executive Advisor, Nippon Keidanren (Japan Seiko Ihara Business Federation), former Japanese Hyoma Ito Ambassador to Russia Tomoko Suzuki Mio Uchida JCIE/USA Shuichi Wada (through March 2003) Kyoko Yamakawa President Jiro Murase Assistant Program Officer Takako Sumoge (through August 2001) Executive Directors Hiroshi Peter Kamura (through March 2002) Program Assistants James Gannon Ayako Eto Megumi Hasegawa Senior Associate Tomone Kozen Kim Gould Ashizawa Shigeko Morita Program Officer Lucy van der Wall Ema Shimada Program Associates Program Associates Sachiko Aoki Miwa de Silva (through February 2002) Rika Hayashi (through March 2002) Lisa Weiss (through August 2003) Nathalie Rudolf Program Assistant Laura Noelle Potter (through June 2003) Anne Marie Dennis Kang Sung Woon (through March 2003) Intern JCIE European Representative Akiko Horiba Hanns Maull, European Representative, JCIE; Internet Administrator Professor of Political Science, Trier University, Patrick Ishiyama Germany Assistant Editor of Publications Chie Kawaguchi Computer Systems Consultant Akio Kobayashi Director of Publications Pamela Noda

Administrative Assistant T Hisami Kenmoku

Assistant to the President REPOR Hideko Okada

Accounting ANNUAL Shoko Tanaka Reiko Yoshiyasu JCIE 2001–2003

51 APPENDICES • 51

Design: © abinitio Y.K./Japan Printing: Sato Printing Co., Ltd./Japan Printed on recycled paper Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE/Japan) 4-9-17 Minami Azabu Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0047 Tel.: 81-3-3446-7781 Fax: 81-3-3443-7580 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.jcie.or.jp

Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE/USA) 274 Madison Avenue, Suite 1102 New York, NY 10016 Tel.: (212) 679-4130 Fax: (212) 679-8410 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.jcie.org

Japan Center for International Exchange (European Representative Office) Zum Wingertsberg 7 54296 Trier, Germany Tel.: 0651-17785 Fax: 0651-180614