Banking, Securities, and Insurance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Banking, Securities, and Insurance UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Inside the Castle Gates: How Foreign Corporations Nagivate Japan's Policymaking Processes Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3q9796r6 Author Kushida, Kenji Erik Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Inside the Castle Gates: How Foreign Companies Navigate Japan‘s Policymaking Processes By Kenji Erik Kushida A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Steven K. Vogel, Chair Professor John Zysman Professor T.J. Pempel Professor Stephen Cohen Fall 2010 Abstract Inside the Castle Gates: How Foreign Companies Navigate Japan‘s Policymaking Processes by Kenji Erik Kushida Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Steven K. Vogel, Chair Multinational corporations (MNCs) are at the heart of today‘s global economy, but their effects on the politics of advanced industrialized countries have not been studied systematically. This dissertation analyzes the case of Japan, a country most likely to reveal foreign MNCs‘ influence. Japan developed for most of its history with an extremely low presence of foreign MNCs, but it experienced a dramatic influx from the mid-1990s, particularly in long-protected sectors at the core of its postwar development model of capitalism. The dissertation explains an observed divergence in the political strategies of foreign MNCs in Japan—disruptive challenges to existing policymaking processes and norms of government-business interactions, versus insider strategies, in which MNCs worked within established organizations and prevailing modes of policymaking. The core contention is that the corporate ―clock speeds‖ of MNCs strongly shape their policy strategies. Clock speeds, the relative rate of change in aspects such as product introduction, product processes, and corporate organization, differs systematically across sectors. By analyzing policy cases within the banking and securities, insurance, telecommunications, and pharmaceuticals sectors, this study shows that MNCs with faster clock speeds tend to pursue disruptive strategies, while MNCs with slower clock speeds tend to pursue insider strategies. This dissertation also shows how changes in Japan‘s model of capitalism enabled the influx of foreign MNCs and expanded MNCs‘ opportunities to exercise voice. Through an analysis at the national, sectoral, and firm levels over time, this study shows how Japan‘s post-bubble political dynamics created new possibilities for foreign entry and voice. The new opportunities to exercise voice were taken advantage of by fast clock speed MNCs, while slower clock speed firms benefited from existing policy processes. The dissertation finds that MNCs can simultaneously influence policy processes along two different time horizons for cause and effect. While disruptive strategies act as exogenous sources of change, delivering shocks to existing arrangements and processes, insider strategies can lead to incremental, but potentially transformative, change over time. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 PART I ENTERING THE CASTLE GATES: REGULATIONS, INSTITUTIONS, AND MARKET DYNAMICS ENABLING THE RISE OF MNCS IN JAPAN CHAPTER 1: THE RISING PRESENCE OF FOREIGN MNCS IN JAPAN ................. 18 CHAPTER 2: THE HISTORY OF JAPAN‘S STRATEGIC REGULATION OF MNCS 36 CHAPTER 3: THE EFFECTS OF JAPAN‘S MODEL OF CAPITALISM ON INWARD FDI AND MNCS ............................................................................................ 52 CHAPTER 4: MNCS AND JAPAN‘S NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM: BANKING, SECURITIES, AND INSURANCE ....................................................................... 81 CHAPTER 5: MNCS IN JAPAN‘S NON-FINANCIAL SECTORS: AUTOMOBILES, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, PHARMACEUTICALS ............................................. 112 PART II INSIDE THE CASTLE GATES: POLITICAL STRATEGIES OF MNCS IN JAPAN CHAPTER 6: POLITICAL STRATEGIES ACROSS SECTORS ................................ 158 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................... 204 i For Cheryl, June, and Toshiaki Kushida ii Acknowledgements It is a privilege and an honor to be given the opportunity to write a note of gratitude to everyone who made this dissertation possible. Steven Vogel, for supporting my various interests while providing insightful guidance and feedback, all the while nudging me to finish this dissertation—graduate school turned out more fun than I would have thought possible; my decision to attend Berkeley to study with you was the right one. John Zysman, a wonderful mentor who opened more doors than I would have dreamed possible—the coincidental meeting that led me to BRIE has been the defining feature of my life at Berkeley, and it will continue to shape my career. T.J. Pempel, for incredible support, often at short notice, from all parts of the world, whose feedback and scholarship continues to shape my understanding of the world. Stephen Cohen, for valuable feedback and wonderful conversations at BRIE, and for co-founding BRIE, the institution to which I owe my career trajectory. Many others in academia helped me along the way. Professor Kyoji Fukao of Hitotsubashi University kindly accommodated me as a visiting scholar. Professor Toshihiko Hayashi and his ICT study group enabled me to visit Japan frequently. Professor Koji Hirao provided numerous valuable contacts, as did Ichiya Nakamura. Countless ministry officials and businesspeople in Japan took time out of their busy schedules to agreed to interviews and hold informal conversations. They are, in many ways, the main characters of this study. Professors Stephen Haggard and William Grimes provided valuable feedback at a panel at the American Political Science Association on earlier versions of the dissertation. I am also grateful to Phillip Lipscy and Kay Shimizu, friends whom I am now happy to call colleagues, for feedback on various segments of the project as I struggled to find the clarity in some parts. Finally, I owe heartfelt thanks to my parents, June and Toshiaki Kushida, and my wife Cheryl, whose unwavering support in all dimensions (even including proofreading) allowed me to pursue this career and lifestyle while finding enjoyment and fulfillment in the process. iii INTRODUCTION: Inside the Castle Gates If you are confronted with a fortified castle, there are a number of strategies you might employ to gain access. You might bring a battering ram to break down the gates. You might try to lay siege. You might try diplomacy and bring an envoy from your own kingdom, and you might search for collaborators on the inside. Or you might employ trickery or attempt a stealthy entry through an unobtrusive side door. Once inside, however, the game changes. You need new tools; a battering ram is no longer useful. Your objectives can change; a siege no longer makes sense, and diplomacy involves more than simply gaining access. Collaborators who helped you enter may no longer be unqualified allies. And trickery or continuing use of side doors becomes more risky, since you may be expelled. From the perspective of many foreign multinational corporations (MNCs), Japan‘s postwar political economy was the castle. While eager to absorb technology and expertise, Japan tightly restricted inward foreign direct investment (FDI). Even after the 1980s, when most formal policy restrictions had been lifted, Japan was an unusual market, with proprietary market conditions and distinctive economic characteristics. To gain market access and reshape the economic environment, some MNCs mobilized international pressure. Others used regulatory loopholes and Japanese allies to gain entry. Some enjoyed considerable success, but many failed. As a result, the image of the world‘s second largest economy persisted as a fortress largely closed to foreign influence. In the late 1990s, however, the castle gates opened. After a series of regulatory shifts, areas largely restricted to foreign entry, such as finance and telecommunications, were wide open. In fact, after a decade of slow or negative growth following the bursting of the economic bubble in 1990, parts of the castle had caught fire. In the late 1990s, crises swept through a number of previously protected sectors such as banking and insurance. Even in competitive manufacturing sectors, venerable firms such as Nissan were on the brink of collapse. Foreign firms were now invited inside the castle to put out the fire – to inject capital and management expertise to rescue Japanese firms. Foreign MNCs moved in quickly, taking prominent positions in core economic sectors. The largest influxes were in automobiles, banking, insurance, pharmaceuticals, securities, and telecommunications. This influx led to developments unthinkable ten to fifteen years earlier. Nissan was revived by a management team from French automobile firm Renault, with a Brazil-born Frenchman of Lebanese descent as CEO. American private equity funds took control of several venerable but bankrupt Japanese banks. Foreign life insurers dominated new markets, and Western investment banks introduced radical new employment practices. Foreign pharmaceutical firms became
Recommended publications
  • Liberty Media Corporation Owns Interests in a Broad Range of Media, Communications and Entertainment Businesses
    2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT YEARS OF LIBERTY 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS STOCK PERFORMANCE INVESTMENT SUMMARY PROXY STATEMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION CORPORATE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding business, product and marketing plans, strategies and initiatives; future financial performance; demand for live events; new service offerings; renewal of licenses and authorizations; revenue growth and subscriber trends at Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (Sirius XM Holdings); our ownership interest in Sirius XM Holdings; the recoverability of goodwill and other long- lived assets; the performance of our equity affiliates; projected sources and uses of cash; the payment of dividends by Sirius XM Holdings; the impacts of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); the anticipated non-material impact of certain contingent liabilities related to legal and tax proceedings; and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In particular, statements in our “Letter to Shareholders” and under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contain forward looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Gene Kimmelman, Senior Director for Advocacy and Public Policy, Consumers Union
    Testimony of Gene Kimmelman, Senior Director for Advocacy and Public Policy, Consumers Union Before the Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee On News Corp./DirecTV Merger June 18, 2003 Washington Office 1666 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 310 • Washington, D.C. 20009-1039 (202) 462-6262 • fax (202) 265-9548 • http://www.consumersunion.org SUMMARY Consumers Union1 welcomes this opportunity to testify before the Senate Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee regarding the proposed merger between the News Corporation (“News Corp.”) and Hughes Electronics Corporation’s satellite television unit DIRECTV (“DirecTV”). Given the current concentration in the media marketplace, as well as the further concentration that will result from the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) recent relaxation of media ownership rules, we believe that the proposed merger between network and cable giant News Corp. and DirecTV, the largest direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service provider, will further increase prices for consumers and decrease the diversity of voices in the media marketplace. Today, consumers are not receiving the fruits that a competitive cable and satellite marketplace should deliver, and consumers are likely to suffer further harm if antitrust officials do not impose substantial conditions on the proposed deal between News Corp. and DirecTV. Since passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, cable rates have risen over 50%,2 and FCC data show that satellite competition is not creating downward pressure on cable rates. Despite the promise for more diversity from new technologies such as the Internet and satellite, a mere five media companies control nearly the same prime time audience shares as the Big Three networks did 40 years ago.3 Unfortunately, the market for news production and distribution is becoming more concentrated.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Investor Day
    2020 Investor Day November 19, 2020 Disclaimers Forward-Looking Statements This presentation includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements about business strategies including Formula 1’s sustainability strategy, the impact of COVID-19, market potential, new service and product launches, Formula 1 tax considerations, anticipated benefits from the new Concorde Agreement, future financial performance (including Formula 1 free cash flow), capital allocation, stock repurchases, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.’s (“SIRI”) realization of benefits from its acquisition of Pandora Media, Inc., the Atlanta Braves mixed-use facility, continuation of our stock repurchase program, the special purpose acquisition company and its initial public offering and other matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements, including, without limitation, possible changes in market acceptance of new products or services, competitive issues, regulatory matters, continued access to capital on terms acceptable to Liberty Media or its subsidiaries, the impact of COVID-19, including on general market conditions and the ability of Formula 1, the Braves and Live Nation to hold live events and fan attendance at such events, and market conditions conducive to stock repurchases. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this presentation, and Liberty Media expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in Liberty Media’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Media Corporation Owns Interests in a Broad Range of Media, Communications and Entertainment Businesses
    Annual REPORT Proxy STATEMENT 2019 2018 Annual REPORT Proxy STATEMENT LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS STOCK PERFORMANCE INVESTMENT SUMMARY PROXY STATEMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION CORPORATE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Certain statements in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking • changes in the nature of key strategic relationships with partners, statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform vendors and joint venturers; Act of 1995, including statements regarding our business, product and • general economic and business conditions and industry trends; marketing strategies and initiatives; new service offerings; revenue and subscriber growth at Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (“SIRIUS XM”); the • consumer spending levels, including the availability and amount of recoverability of our goodwill and other long-lived assets; the performance individual consumer debt; of our equity affiliates; our projected sources and uses of cash; the • rapid technological changes; payment of dividends by SIRIUS XM; the expected benefits of SIRIUS XM’s acquisition of Pandora; the continuation of our stock repurchase program; • impairments of third-party intellectual property rights; monetization of sports media rights; plans for the Battery Atlanta; the • our indebtedness could adversely affect operations and could limit the anticipated non-material impact of certain contingent liabilities related to ability of our subsidiaries to react to changes in the economy or our legal and tax proceedings; and other matters arising in the ordinary course industry; of business. In particular, statements in our “Letter to Shareholders” and under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition • failure to protect the security of personal information about our and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures businesses’ customers, subjecting our businesses to potentially costly About Market Risk” contain forward looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16
    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 137 Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 137 Exhibit A Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 208 Filed 06/01/20 Entered 06/01/20 16:57:32 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 137 Exhibit A1 Served via Overnight Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Country Aastha Broadcasting Network Limited Attn: Legal Unit213 MezzanineFl Morya LandMark1 Off Link Road, Andheri (West) Mumbai 400053 IN Abs Global LTD Attn: Legal O'Hara House 3 Bermudiana Road Hamilton HM08 BM Abs-Cbn Global Limited Attn: Legal Mother Ignacia Quezon City Manila PH Aditya Jain S/O Sudhir Kumar Jain Attn: Legal 12, Printing Press Area behind Punjab Kesari Wazirpur Delhi 110035 IN AdminNacinl TelecomunicacionUruguay Complejo Torre De Telecomuniciones Guatemala 1075. Nivel 22 HojaDeEntrada 1000007292 5000009660 Montevideo CP 11800 UY Advert Bereau Company Limited Attn: Legal East Legon Ars Obojo Road Asafoatse Accra GH Africa Digital Network Limited c/o Nation Media Group Nation Centre 7th Floor Kimathi St PO Box 28753-00100 Nairobi KE Africa Media Group Limited Attn: Legal Jamhuri/Zaramo Streets Dar Es Salaam TZ Africa Mobile Network Communication Attn: Legal 2 Jide Close, Idimu Council Alimosho Lagos NG Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal 131Rue1221 Entree Des Hydrocarbures Derriere Star Land Hotel Bonapriso-Douala Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Cameroon Attn: Legal BP12153 Bonapriso Douala CM Africa Mobile Networks Gb,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY THE NEW FRONTIER FOR PRODUCTIVITY First published in Japan by Asian Productivity Organization 1-24-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-0033, Japan www.apo-tokyo.org © 2017 Asian Productivity Organization All rights reserved. None of the contents of this publication may be used, reproduced, stored, or transferred in any form or by any means for commercial purposes without prior written permission from the APO. The APO Secretariat thanks the NPOs for providing updates on their directory information and some of the project-related images used in this report. ISBN: 978-92-833-2476-8 Designed by B&M Nxt. APO ANNUAL REPORT 2016 APO ANNUAL REPORT 2016 iii CONTENTS APO Directors, Alternate Directors, NPO Heads, and Liaison Officers iv APO Secretariat vi Foreword vii Organization 2 2016 GBM and WSM 8 Brief description of 2016 APO Projects 16 Strengthening of NPOs 18 Promoting the Development of SMEs and communities 34 Catalyzing Innovation-led Productivity Growth 42 Green Productivity 58 Individual-country Programs 67 Evaluation of APO Projects 70 Information Program 72 International Cooperation 81 APO 2016 Projects at a Glance 84 2016 APO Project Summary 86 Financial Report 128 The NPOs 148 Abbreviations and Acronyms Used 150 iv APO ANNUAL REPORT 2016 APO DIRECTORS, ALTERNATE DIRECTORS, NPO HEADS, AND LIAISON OFFICERS (AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2016) APO CHAIR FIJI ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Margarita R. Songco Director Director & NPO Head APO Director for the Philippines Salaseini Daunabuna Dr. Roya Tabatabaei Yazdi
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Consolidated Financial Result[108KB]
    (Unwarranted translation of “kessan tanshin”, provided only for reference purposes only.) May 23, 2000 Non-consolidated Annual Results for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2000 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. Stock Exchange (Section) : (Listed at) Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya (First section). Kyoto, Fukuoka, Sapporo Frankfurt Code Number : 9104 Address : Tokyo Head Office: 1-1, Toranomon 2-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo For Further Information, Contact : Kazuaki Konishi, General Manager of Finance & Accounting Division Phone 03 (3587) 7034 Meeting of Board of Directors held: May 23, 2000 Regular General Shareholders’ Meeting to be held: June 27, 2000 1. Results of the Fiscal Year ended March 31,2000 (from April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000) (1) Operational Results Revenues Operating Income Ordinary Income Net Income Millions of yen Millions of yen Millions of yen Millions of yen 2000 651,936 ( 11.3%) 34,044 ( 28.0%) 29,153 ( 60.6%) 8,701 (△ 4.8%) 1999 585,514 ( 2.4%) 26,606 ( 67.6%) 18,150 ( 35.3%) 9,139 ( 81.6%) Earnings Earnings per share Rate of Return Rate of Return Profit Margin Ratio per share After adjustment for on Equity on Assets (Ordinary Potential Dilution Income/Revenue) Yen Yen % % % 2000 7.08 - 6.1 4.9 4.5 1999 8.25 - 6.8 3.4 3.1 (Notes) 1. Average Number of Shares Issued and Outstanding : Year ended March 31,2000 1,229,410,445 shares Year ended March 31,1999 1,107,917,146 shares 2. Material Change in Accounting Method: NIL 3. Percent: Increase/Decrease against corresponding period of the previous year on Net Sales, Operating Income, Ordinary Income, and Net Income.
    [Show full text]
  • JCIE's Annual Report
    JAPAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE 2001–2003 Annual Report GLOBAL THINKNET CIVILNET POLITICAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS President’s Message 2 CivilNet 23 JCIE Activities 5 Promoting Civil Society and Philanthropy 25 The Role of Philanthropy in Postwar U.S.-Japan Global ThinkNet 7 Relations 25 Study and Dialogue Projects 9 GrantCraft—Japanese Video Project 25 APAP Forums and Seminars 9 International Survey Project—The Civil Society Global ThinkNet Conference, Tokyo 10 Sector and NGO Activities in Asia and Europe 26 Intellectual Dialogue on Building Survey on the Status of Exchange Programs Asia’s Tomorrow 10 between the U.S. and Japan 26 A Gender Agenda: Asia-Europe Dialogue 11 Seminar Series with Civil Society Leaders 26 Russia-Japan Policy Dialogue 12 Study Mission on American Philanthropy 27 Cooperation with the Asia Pacific Philanthropy Policy-Oriented Research 13 Consortium (APPC) 27 Vision of Asia Pacific in the 21st Century 13 Facilitating Philanthropic Programs of Asia Pacific and the Global Order Overseas Foundations and Corporations 29 After September 11 13 Levi Strauss Foundation Advised Fund of JCIE 29 The Rise of China and the Changing East Asian Order 14 “Positive Lives Asia” Photo Exhibition Tour 31 Asia Pacific Security Outlook 14 Goldman Sachs Global Leaders Program 31 Force, Intervention, and Sovereignty 15 Lucent Global Science Scholars Program 32 New Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations 15 Civil Society and Grassroots-Level Governance for a New Century: Japanese Exchanges 33 Challenges, American Experience 16 A50 Caravan 33 The Future of Governance and the Role Asia Pacific Leadership Program in Tokyo 33 of Politicians 17 Grassroots Network 34 The Transformation of Japanese Communities Miyazaki Prefecture Commemorative and the Emerging Local Agenda 18 Symposiums on Internationalization 34 The Intellectual Infrastructure for East Asian Community-Building 18 Political Exchange Program 35 Support and Cooperation for Research and U.S.-Japan Parliamentary Exchange Program 37 Dialogue 19 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NIKKEI JAPAN 1000 Constituents (As of March 25, 2005)
    NIKKEI JAPAN 1000 Constituents (as of March 25, 2005) Tokyo Stock Exchange 1st 2580 COCA-COLA CENTRAL JAPAN 1332 NIPPON SUISAN 2590 DYDO DRINCO 1334 MARUHA GROUP 2591 CALPIS 1377 SAKATA SEED 2593 ITO EN 1379 HOKUTO 2594 KEY COFFEE 1601 TEIKOKU OIL 2595 KIRIN BEVERAGE 1662 JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION 2602 NISSHIN OILLIO GROUP 1720 TOKYU CONSTRUCTION 2607 FUJI OIL 1721 COMSYS HOLDINGS 2613 J-OIL MILLS 1722 MISAWA HOMES HOLDINGS 2651 LAWSON 1801 TAISEI 2664 CAWACHI 1802 OBAYASHI 2670 ABC-MART 1803 SHIMIZU 2678 ASKUL 1808 HASEKO 2681 GEO 1812 KAJIMA 2685 POINT 1820 NISHIMATSU CONSTRUCTION 2692 ITOCHU-SHOKUHIN 1821 SUMITOMO MITSUI CONSTRUCTION 2730 EDION 1824 MAEDA 2731 NIWS 1833 OKUMURA 2768 SOJITZ HOLDINGS 1860 TODA 2779 MITSUKOSHI 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION 2784 ALFRESA HOLDINGS 1881 NIPPO 2801 KIKKOMAN 1883 MAEDA ROAD CONSTRUCTION 2802 AJINOMOTO 1885 TOA 2809 Q.P. 1893 PENTA-OCEAN CONSTRUCTION 2810 HOUSE FOODS 1924 PANAHOME 2811 KAGOME 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY 2815 ARIAKE JAPAN 1928 SEKISUI HOUSE 2871 NICHIREI 1941 CHUDENKO 2873 KATOKICHI 1942 KANDENKO 2874 YOKOHAMA REITO 1946 TOENEC 2875 TOYO SUISAN 1951 KYOWA EXEO 2897 NISSIN FOOD PRODUCTS 1959 KYUDENKO 2908 FUJICCO 1961 SANKI ENGINEERING 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO 1963 JGC 3001 KATAKURA INDUSTRIES 1969 TAKASAGO THERMAL ENGINEERING 3002 GUNZE 1970 HITACHI PLANT ENGINEERING 3101 TOYOBO 1973 NEC SYS. INTEGRA. & CONST. 3103 UNITIKA 1979 TAIKISHA 3105 NISSHINBO INDUSTRIES 1982 HIBIYA ENGINEERING 3106 KURABO INDUSTRIES 2001 NIPPON FLOUR MILLS 3110 NITTO BOSEKI 2002 NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP 3116 TOYOTA
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008  Organization
    APO Directors, Alternate Directors, Liaison Officers, and NPO Heads APO Chair FIJI ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Mr. Mohsen Haji Mirzaie Director Director & NPO Head APO Director for the Islamic Republic of Iran Mr. Taito Waqa Mr. Mohsen Haji Mirzaie Permanent Secretary for Labour, Indus- Head, National Iranian Productivity Center trial Relations & Employment, Ministry for APO First Vice Chair Labour, Industrial Relations, Employment, Local Government & Housing Alternate Director Mr. Tadao Chino (until July 2008) Alternate Director & NPO Head Dr. Mahmood Ghanizadeh APO Director for Japan International Affairs Director, National Mr. Jone Usamate Iranian Productivity Center Director General, Training and Productivity Authority of Fiji Liaison Officer Not designated APO Second Vice Chair Dr. Dong Kyu Choi Acting Liaison Officer Ms. Sainimili Mocevakaca APO Director for Republic of Korea JAPAN Labour Inspector (APO), Ministry of Labour, Industrial Relations, Employment, Local Director Government, Urban Development & Hous- Mr. Tadao Chino (until July 2008) ing Senior Advisor, Nomura Research Institute, BANGLADESH Ltd. Director HONG KONG Alternate Director Mr. Sheikh Enayetullah Mr. Masato Watanabe Director Not designated Secretary, Ministry of Industries Deputy Director General, Ministry of For- eign Affairs Alternate Director Not designated Alternate Director & NPO Head Liaison Officer Dr. Md. Nazrul Islam Liaison Officer Not designated Mr. Yoji Osaki Director, National Productivity Organisa- Director, International Department, Japan tion, Ministry of Industries NPO Head Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Not designated Development Liaison Officer Mr. Abdul Baqui Chowdhury NPO Head INDIA Mr. Tsuneaki Taniguchi Senior Research Officer, National Produc- tivity Organisation, Ministry of Industries President, Japan Productivity Center for Director Socio-Economic Development Mr. Ajay Shankar CAMBODIA Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Ministry of Commerce & REPUBLIC OF KOREA Director Industry Director & NPO Head Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecobalance 2010
    EcoBalance2010 The 9th International Conference on EcoBalance November 9-12, 2010, Tokyo, Japan EcoBalance 2010 The 9th International Conference on EcoBalance Towards & Beyond 2020 November 9-12, 2010 National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation (Miraikan), Tokyo, Japan Proceedings Organized by Co-organized by The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan Ecomaterials Forum EcoBalance2010 The 9th International Conference on EcoBalance November 9-12, 2010, Tokyo, Japan Credit Copyright The copyright of the individual contributions will revert to the contributors while the copyright of this CD-ROM belongs to The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan. CD-ROM This CD-ROM was compiled and published by The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan Photocopying of CD-ROM Single photocopies of single articles may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. Permission of the Publisher and payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or systematic copying, copying for advertising or promotional purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery. Permissions may be sought directly to The Institute of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan: E-mail ([email protected]) or FAX (+81- 3-3597-0535). Derivative works of CD-ROM Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution. Permission of the Publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. Electronic storage or usage of CD-ROM Permission of the Publisher is required to store or use electronically any material contained in this journal, including any article or part of an article.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Resolutions (AGM June 2003)
    The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. Global Securities Services Division Notice of Resolutions Below is the outcome of the votes taken in the AGMs held in June 2003. Y: Approved N: Rejected Agenda Item No. QUICK ISIN Description Remarks 123456789101112131415 1301 JP3257200000 KYOKUYO CO., LTD. YYYYYY 1331 JP3666000009 NICHIRO CORPORATION --CHGED FROM NICHIRO GYOGYO KAISHA YYYYYYY 1332 JP3718800000 NIPPON SUISAN KAISHA, LTD. YYYYY 1333 JP3876600002 MARUHA CORP. (FM TAIYO FISHERY) YYYYYY 1379 JP3843250006 HOKUTO YYYYYY 1491 JP3519000008 CHUGAI MINING YYYYY 1501 JP3889600007 MITSUI MINING YYYY 1503 JP3406200000 SUMITOMO COAL MINING YYY 1515 JP3680800004 NITTETSU MINING YYYYY 1518 JP3894000003 MITSUI-MATSUSHIMA (EX-MATSUSHIMA KOSAN) YYY 1725 JP3816710002 FUJITA CORPORATION (NEW) YYYY 1736 JP3172410007 OTEC CORPORATION YYYYYY 1742 JP3421900006 SECOM TECHNO SERVICE CO.,LTD. YYYYY 1757 JP3236100008 KIING HOME YYYYY 1777 JP3224800007 KAWASAKI SETSUBI KOGYO YYYYYY 1793 JP3190500003 OHMOTO GUMI YYYYYY 1800 JP3629600002 TONE GEO TECH YYYYY 1801 JP3443600006 TAISEI CORP. YYYYYY 1802 JP3190000004 OBAYASHI CORPORATION YYYYYY 1803 JP3358800005 SHIMIZU CORP. YYYYY 1805 JP3629800008 TOBISHIMA CORP. YYYYYYY 1808 JP3768600003 HASEKO CORP. ( CHGD FM HASEGAWA KOUMUTEN ) YYYY 1810 JP3863600007 MATSUI CONSTRUCTION YYY Y 1811 JP3427800002 ZENITAKA CORP. YYY YYYY 1812 JP3210200006 KAJIMA CORP. YYY YYY 1813 JP3825600004 FUDO CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. YYY YY 1815 JP3545600003 TEKKEN CORP. (FM TEKKEN CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.) YYY Y 1816 JP3128000001 ANDO CORP. YYY YYYY 1820 JP3659200004 NISHIMATSU CONSTRUCTION YYY YY 1821 JP3889200006 SUMITOMO MITSUI CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. (FM. MITSUI COST. CO YY 1822 JP3498600000 DAIHO CONSTRUCTION YYY YYY 1824 JP3861200008 MAEDA CORP. YYY YY 1825 JP3227350000 ECO-TECH CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD.(FM ISHIHARA CONSTRUCTION) Y Y YY Agenda 2 : Short of quorum 1827 JP3643600004 NAKANO CORP.
    [Show full text]