DOCSLIB.ORG

ITEM 6 Planning Committee 16Th January

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ITEM 6 Planning Committee 16Th January ITEM 6 Planning Committee 16th January 2018 Application No : 17/05198/TPO Works to trees subject to a TPO Location : 41 Canewdon Gardens Runwell Wickford Essex SS11 7BJ Proposal : T2 - Oak of MWA Arboricultural report; works - REMOVE; reason: the above tree is considered to be responsible for root induced clay shrinkage subsidence damage to the subject property. TPO Reference : TPO/1987/007 Case Officer : Lynn Cameron Applicant : Owner/Occupier Agent : MWA Arboriculture Ltd Date Valid : 18th September 2017 01DCOMTP 17/05198/TPOItem 6 Page 1 09_OFFRPT_2 REPORT This application was considered by the Planning Committee at the meeting on 28th November. The Committee resolved to defer a decision on the application to enable officers to consider whether further information can be obtained to substantiate the conclusions of the consultants mentioned in the report, the findings to be discussed with the Chairman, Vice Chairman and Councillor Mountain before being brought back to the Committee. Officers have instructed an independent loss adjuster to review the case and advise accordingly. Once received, officers will discuss the findings with the Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Councillor Mountain as instructed and provide an update at the meeting. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The application is referred to the Planning Committee as there is significant local opposition to the removal of a preserved tree and the Council would need to accept liability for compensation if permission to remove the tree is refused. 1.2 The application seeks permission to fell one preserved Oak tree which has been implicated in subsidence at an adjacent property, 32 Canewdon Gardens. The Oak tree is part of an established tree belt which is on the bank of Runwell Brook and provides a natural barrier between Canewdon Gardens and three newer properties on the other side of the brook. The tree is situated on land outside the curtilage of No 41 Canewdon Gardens which is recorded as “Unregistered” by the Land Registry. 1.3 The application is accompanied by an Arboricultural Appraisal Report and an Engineers report that implicate the tree in damage to the property related to clay shrinkage subsidence. 1.4 Although the tree is an attractive feature and provides an important natural boundary on the bank of the brook, its implication in subsidence at 32 Canewdon Gardens means that permission to fell cannot be withheld without the Council assuming liability for any subsequent loss or damage to the property from the preserved tree. 1.5 In the circumstances the application is recommended for approval. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The oak tree, protected by TPO 1987/007, is situated on land outside the curtilage of 41 Canewdon Gardens on land which is unregistered. It probably formed part of an old hedgerow, along the brook. 2.3 Immediately to the left of the tree, on the other side of the driveway, is a smaller Oak tree which is not protected by TPO but is also implicated in the subsidence claim at No 32 Canewdon Gardens. 2.4 The protected tree is approximately 20m from the corner elevation of 32 Canewdon Gardens, the property with alleged subsidence damage. The highway and driveway across a bridge to 34, 36 and 38 Canewdon Gardens is situated between the tree and the property. 2.5 There is a stream immediately to the north of the protected tree. Local residents have indicated that this area is liable to flooding during heavy rain. 01DCOMTP 17/05198/TPOItem 6 Page 2 09_OFFRPT_2 2.6 The owner of the property has advised that the property has recently sustained flooding internally from a damaged pipe in the bathroom. Internal water damage was seen at the time of the site inspection. 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF TREE 3.1 The preserved Oak tree has an estimated diameter of 740mm at breast height which gives it an approximate age of 100 years. The tree is approximately 20m tall, with a canopy spread of 9m, extending over the driveway leading to Nos 34, 36 and 28. 3.2 On the other side of the driveway and closer to No 32 (16m), is a younger Oak tree that is not the subject of a TPO. When viewed from the junction of Egbert Gardens with Canewdon Gardens, the trees appear as one canopy. 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 4.1 The proposal seeks permission to fell the preserved oak tree (T1), as it is considered to be responsible for root induced clay shrinkage subsidence damage to the subject property. The unprotected tree is also proposed to be removed. 4.2 The application is accompanied by an Arboricultural Appraisal Report by MWA Arboriculture Ltd and an Engineers report that considers the damage to the property to be related to clay shrinkage subsidence. 5.0 RELEVANT HISTORY TPO/1987/007 – TPO to protect 1 x Oak tree – from the details on the file, it would appear that the TPO was served as a result of the proposed development of 34, 36 and 38 Canewdon Gardens 10/05241/TPO - Oak (T1 1987/007) - within road - reduce lateral spread towards 41 Canewdon Gardens by 2m max, cutting to suitable growing points (suitable growing points are side branches that are at least one third the diameter of the originating branch); crown clean – made by the owner of No 41 Canewdon Gardens 6.0 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS • Parish Council: Strongly object to the loss of the tree. • Anglian Water: No response received • Local Residents: 16 letters of objection. Two letters supporting the application. The Parish Council and other objectors raise a number of other possible causes for the damage to 32 Canewdon Gardens, and raise concern about damage to other properties from heave if the trees are removed. These are discussed below. 7.0 AMENITY CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Both trees have high amenity value as they can be clearly seen from the junction of Canewdon Gardens and Egbert Gardens, forming a backdrop to the residential properties. The road is well used as it provides access to Runwell County Primary School. The school use the tree as an educational tool. In addition, it provides an important linear wildlife habitat ambiance to the adjacent residential properties. Due to the age of T1 there is evidence to show this was part of a historic hedgerow on the edge of Runwell Brook and therefore has importance to the Parish of Runwell. The proposal would mean the loss of an historic tree and open up views to 34, 36 and 38 Canewdon Gardens, across the brook. 01DCOMTP 17/05198/TPOItem 6 Page 3 09_OFFRPT_2 7.2 The documentation supporting the application states that the main area of damage is on the left- hand side of the dwelling. 7.3 Given the strength of local feeling supporting the amenity the tree provides, an exercise has been carried out to place a value on the trees using the recognised tool of CAVAT (Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees). This system provides a basis for managing trees in the UK as public assets rather than liabilities. It is designed not only to be a strategic tool and aid to decision-making in relation to the tree stock, but also to be applicable to individual cases, where the value of a single tree needs to be expressed in monetary terms. 7.4 It is intended particularly for Councils and primarily for publicly owned trees. It is established in UK law, in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Section 198, that trees have value as a public amenity and therefore local planning authorities are given a duty to protect trees in the public interest. The legislation itself does not specify how amenity is to be assessed, leaving it open for the value of trees to be expressed in the most appropriate way. CAVAT works by calculating the unit value for each square centimetre of tree stem, by extrapolation from the average cost of a range of newly planted trees. 7.5 The system has been in use since 2008 when it was approved as fit for purpose and has been promoted by the London Tree Officers Association (LTOA). The first major recognition was its inclusion in the Joint Mitigation Protocol, agreed between the LTOA and the insurance industry, published 2008. The calculation for these trees has been discussed with the author of the system to confirm the figures are correct. 7.6 Using this method the tree has a value of £62,287. The cost of repairs to the property if the tree remains is likely to be significantly higher. 7.7 As Members will be aware the other form of assessment that is used to assess trees for consideration for a Tree Preservation Order is TEMPO. Under this method of assessment, the tree scored 23 justifying the TPO. 8.0 ASSESSMENT 8.1 The site investigation report shows the building to be shallow founded at 450mm below ground level on London Clay. The laboratory tests show the clay to be of high shrinkage potential. 8.2 Roots were noted to a depth of 1.8m. Those to 1.5m were identified as oak and a shrub. 8.3 The Arboriculturists report concludes that two oaks (T1 and T2 on their plans) are potentially the cause of the subsidence, and recommends that they both be removed. T2 is the protected tree and is furthest from the building. Both are capable of laying roots beneath the building. 8.4 Consulting structural engineers, engaged by the Council, have assessed the information supplied with the application. They accept there is clear evidence of seasonal and progressive movement in the building most probably caused by tree root action, but consider that the data does not conclusively show which tree is responsible, or whether both are to blame.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report
    London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report Introduction of New Approach Procedures Issue 1.1 Prepared by: NATS Unmarked London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Project Overview 5 1.2. Consultation Overview 7 2. Confidentiality 8 3. Stakeholder Engagement 9 3.1. Introduction 9 3.2. National Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 10 3.3. London Southend Airport Consultative Committee 11 3.4. Local Authorities 13 3.5. National Bodies 16 3.6. MPs 17 3.7. Airspace Users 18 3.8. Others 20 3.9. Members of the Public 20 4. Summary of Consultation Feedback 22 4.1. Stakeholder Invitees 22 4.2. Stakeholder Responses 23 4.3. Responses and Key Themes 24 5. Stakeholder Responses 26 5.1. Key Themes Raised by Stakeholders 26 5.2. Direct Questions Raised & Answers 30 5.3. Concerns Raised & Answers 32 6. Intention to Proceed with the Airspace Change Proposal 35 7. Post-Consultation Steps 37 7.1. Feedback to Stakeholders 37 7.2. Airspace Change Proposal 37 7.3. Post-Implementation Review 37 8. Further Correspondence & Feedback 38 Introduction of New Approach Procedures Page 2 of 40 London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 3 Appendix A 39 Appendix B 40 List of Figures Figure 1 - Image illustrating London Southend CAS (incl. Danger Areas) ............................................ 5 Figure 2 - Image illustrating proposed RNAV routes & CAS .................................................................. 6 Figure 3 - Image illustrating missed approach and Runway 05 transition routes & CAS ................... 7 Figure 4 - Chart showing NATMAC responses...................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 - Chart showing LSACC responses .......................................................................................... 13 Figure 6 - Chart showing Kent Councils responses .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSEX. • Smith Mrs
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] .FAR 469 ESSEX. • Smith Mrs. Edward, Link farm, West Smith Mrs. Thos. Mudwall, DunmowS.O Spooner Samuel, Steeple, Maldon Hanningfield, Chelmsford Smith WaIter, Blamsters hall, Great Sprigett Jsph. Castle Hedinghm.Hlstead Smith Mrs. Elizabeth, Bardfield hall, Easton, Dunmow Springett James, Gt. Braxted, Witham Great Bardfield, Braintree Smith William, Byron house, Galley- Spurge John, Cooper's Hill house, High Smith F. Spurrier, High Ongar, Ingtstne wood common, Chelmsford Ongar, Brentwood Smith Frederick John, Colliers wood, Smith Wm. Great Chishall, Royston Spurgeon Charles, Broxted, Dunmow8.0 Ardleigh, Colchester Smith Wm. Great Leighs, Chelmsford Spurgeon Obadiah, Woodgates, Broxted, Smith Frederick William, Mocken Herds Smith Wm. Little Bedfords, Havering- Dunmow S.O farm, Barnston, Chelmsford atte-Bower, Romford Squier S. W. Horndon-on-the-Hill,Rmfrd Smith G. Bowsers, Ashdon, Cambridge Smith Wm.Market farm, Old Sampford, Squier Wm. Dunton Hill's farm, East Smith G. Coxtie gm. Sth.Weald, Brntwd Braintree Horndon, Brentwood Smith G. Maidens, High Easter, Chmsfrd Smith W. New ho. Stambourne, Hlstead Squires Charles,Blanketts farm, Childer~ Smith Geo. Purples, Lit. Saling,Braintree SmoothyH. Birdbrk. hall,Brdbrk. Hlsted ditch, Brentwood Smith George Shoobridge, Kings, Little Snape F. Boarded barns,Shelley, Brntwd Staines Albert, Warwicks, White Rooth~ Easton, Dunmow . SnapeF.The Wonts, High Ongar,Brntwd ing, Chelmsford Smith Henry, Place farm, Great Bard- Snow Mrs. A. Martells, Dunmow S.O Staines George, Ray Place farm, Black~ field, Braintree Snow J. Gt. Hallingbury, Bp.'sStortford more, Brentwood Smith Henry, Salcott, Kelvedon Snow John, Mill house, Dunmow S.O Staines Miss M. A.Maldon Wick., Maldon Smith H. C. Stebbing green, Chelmsford Snow Peter, Long's farm, Little Wal- Staines Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport Consultation
    London Southend Airport Flight Path Consultation Consultation Concerning the Introduction of New Approach Procedures Introduction of RNAV Approach Procedures Version 1.0 00 Month 0000 Prepared by 2 London Southend Airport Consultation Table of contents Executive Summary 3 1 Justification for PBN Routes 5 1.1 What will PBN Routes Achieve? 5 2 Consultation 8 2.1 What is this Consultation About? 8 2.2 What is this Consultation not about? 8 2.3 Who is being consulted? 9 2.4 Why should you participate? 9 3 Current Aircraft Operations at London Southend Airport 10 3.1 London Southend Airport Airspace 10 3.2 Runways & Current Procedures 15 3.3 Arrival Tracks 20 3.4 Runway 05 24 3.5 Runway 23 30 4 Proposed Additions/ Operations 35 4.1 Runway 05 39 4.2 Runway 23 45 5 Environmental Considerations 49 5.1 Noise 49 5.2 Uptake of PBN and Consequent Track Concentration 58 5.3 Routing 58 5.4 Visual Impact and Tranquillity 60 5.5 CO2 Emissions & Local Air Quality 60 6 Design Evolution & Considered Options 62 6.1 Runway 23 62 6.2 Runway 05 68 6.3 GEGMU Transition 75 7 How do you participate? 77 7.1 How to respond 77 7.2 Who are we consulting? 78 7.3 What if you have no comment to make on the proposals? 78 7.4 What happens with the responses? 78 7.5 Can I have a copy of the consultation responses? 79 7.6 Who monitors the consultation and who can I contact if I have concerns? 79 7.7 Will my query/response be treated as confidential? 79 7.8 Analysis of the consultation feedback 80 7.9 What happens next? 80 Appendices 82 Appendix A: Technical Details 82 Appendix B: List of Stakeholders 85 Appendix C: Acronym List 88 Page 2 of 89 London Southend Airport Consultation 3 Executive Summary This consultation is about the introduction of new approach procedures at London Southend Airport (LSA), and the impact they may have.
    [Show full text]
  • Canewdon Church Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
    Rochford District Council October 2007 Local Development Framework Evidence Base Canewdon Church Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan LDF Evidence Base Rochford District Council Cantonese Gujarati Spanish 如果你 需要 放大,盲 Si desea esta información impresa en letra grande, 文資訊或者不同語言的 Braille o en otro idioma, 版本請聯絡 01702 546 366 por favor llame al teléfono 01702 546 366 Urdu Portugese Caso necessite desta informação em impressão maior, em Braille ou noutra língua, por favor contacte 01702 546 366 Shona Kana uchida ruzivo, kana tsananguro iyi yakanyorwa nemavara makuru, kana kuthi yakanyorwa nerurimi rwemapofu, kana nerumwe rurimi, kana umwe mufauro sununguka kuti taurira parunare ronoti 01702 546 366 If you would like this information in large print, Braille or another language please contact 01702 546 366 This document was produced by Essex County Council for Rochford District Council. Contributions to this document were made by the following officers in the Essex County Council Historic Buildings Section: Karen Fielder MA, PGDip With document production by Cathryn Thaiss © Rochford District Council and Essex County Council Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Character statement 2 3. Statutory Protection 3 4. Planning Policies 5 5. Origins and development Location and Landscape Setting 5 Historical Development 6 6. Character Appraisal Spatial Analysis 11 Character Analysis 16 Problems and Pressures 23 7. Recommendations 23 Bibliography 25 Appendix Listed buildings in the conservation area 26 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Canewdon is a large parish, which extends for several miles along the southern side of the Crouch estuary. The area has important historical associations, with old entrenchments that once existed between the village and the river believed to mark the site of Canute’s camp before his victorious battle over Edmund Ironside in 10161.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roach Valley Way Is a Circular Walk Of
    The Roach Valley Way drain Althorne Creek The Cliff Black Point Bridgemarsh Island drain mud mud drain Lower Cliff Reach MHW MHW Raypit's Nature Reserve Raypits Reach Easter Reach MHW Lands mud mud End drain Tideways drain Upper Raypits drain drain Old Fleet Lower Raypits River Crouch A12 It is strongly recommended that Essex County Council supports the mud The Roach Valley Way Chelmsford A12 Maldon strong comfortable ankle supporting Countryside Code, which helps Pudsey drain Hall footwear is worn and take additional members of the public respect, is a circular walk of A414 bird hide Riverside Lion Creek Timber Pudsey Hall Lane waterproof and windproof clothing. protect and enjoy the countryside. Village Yard Nature Reserve Holiday twenty three miles around A130 Bolt A little foodButts Hilland waterpill box should be Park South Hall Follow the countryside code: Woodham Market Wallasea Ferrers provided for the journey. Burnham Hill Island south-east Essex leading on Crouch Lion Creek River Crouch Canewdon CANEWDON pill box Be safe, plan ahead and follow any Saltings Lion Camp FP Canewdon Poultry Creeksea Road Farm BeaconThe routeHall Farm is clearly signposted and Wharf ScaldhurstWickford Hockley Hill signs Farm FP PagleshamGlenesk New Hall Farm Rayleigh Mill you through a rich variety waymarked in both directions.Gays Lane Using B1013 Hatch Church High Street A127 Larkhill Ave FP FP River Roach Note: The gates to Leave gates and property as you findRaymonds Lion A130 FP Rochford this booklet should make your Farm Wades Basildon Benfleet A127 St Nicholas Church A House village The of landscapes from the are locked at dusk.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochford District Council Web-Site At
    LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED WEEK ENDING: 27th November 2020 The following applications have been received by the Council. Any persons or organisations wishing to make comments on these applications should do so in writing to Marcus Hotten, Assistant Director of Place & Environment, Main Reception Council Offices, South Street, Rochford, SS4 1BW within 18 days of the date of this list. (Planning applications for review relate to: Full planning permission (FUL), Change Of Use (COU),Listed Building (LBC), Advertisement (ADV), Lawfulness Existing only (LDC)). Members should contact the Planning Officers if they consider there would be justification for a Member site visit concerning any particular Committee Item listed herein, prior to the application being considered at Committee. This should be done within the next 14 days. Copies of the applications and plans may be inspected at the above address during normal office hours. _____________________________________________________ Page 1 of 12 20/00632/FUL Parish: Ashingdon Parish Council Ward: Hockley And Ashingdon Responsibility: Delegated Officer: Mr Michael Anderson Proposal: Proposed extension of existing driveway involving the laying of hard surface (Including the removal of a section of existing driveway) and extension of decking. Construct detached shed. Construct single storey side extension Determination 18th January 2021 Date Location: Holmfield Canewdon Road Ashingdon Grid Reference Easting 586524 Northing 193991 Applicant: Mrs Alison Frost Holmfield Canewdon Road Rochford, Essex SS4 3JL Ward Cllr(s): Cllr M R Carter Cllr Mrs C A Weston Vacancy _____________________________________________________ 20/00798/FUL Parish: Rochford Parish Council Ward: Roche South Responsibility: Delegated Officer: Ms Katie Fowler Proposal: Extend existing dropped kerb and widen vehicular access to the site frontage.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING Shiff 1. Essex Record Office
    Notes Place of publication London unless otherwise stated. PROLOGUE: MAKING SHIff 1. Essex Record Office (hereafter ERO) DIP 202118113 n.d. postmarked 1801. 2. W. Cobbett, Cottage Economy (1822; 17th edn 1850), p.115. 3. O. Hurton, 'Women without men: widows and spinsters in Britain and France in the eighteenth century' Journal of Family History, 9:4 (1984), p. 363. See also O. Hufton, The Poor of Eighteenth-century France 1750- 1789 (Oxford, 1974). 4. ERO DIP 94/18/42 291511825. 1 INTRODUCTION: WOMEN ADAPTING TO CAPITALISM 1. T. Fuller, The Worthies (1662; abridged, ed. J. Freeman, 1952), p. 318. 2. For more background on Essex's economic history in this period see A.FJ. Brown, Essex at Work 1700-1815 (Chelmsford, 1969); K.H. Burley, 'The economic development of Essex in the later seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries' (PhD thesis, University of London 1957). 3. MJ. Dobson, 'Population, disease and mortality in south-east England 1600-1800' (D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 1982); "'Marsh fever" - the geography of malaria in England', Journal of Historical Geography, 6:4 (1980), pp. 357-89; 'When malaria was an English disease', Geo­ graphical Magazine (Feb. 1982), pp. 94-9. 4. See, for example, K. Wrightson and D. Levine, Poverty and Piety in an English Village: Terling 1525-1700 (New York, 1979). 5. J. Lown, Women and Industrialisation: Gender at Work in Nineteenth­ century England (Oxford, 1990). 6. Thomas Wright, The History and Topography of the County of Essex Vols 1 & 2 (1842). 7. For looking at visual imagery of the poor more generally, see J.
    [Show full text]
  • Breach of Planning Control on Land at Moons Farm, Canewdon Road, Ashingdon, Essex
    PLANNING SERVICES COMMITTEE - 30 May 2002 Item 7 BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL ON LAND AT MOONS FARM, CANEWDON ROAD, ASHINGDON, ESSEX 1 SUMMARY 1.1 To consider the report of the Head of Planning Services regarding a breach of planning control, namely the storage and siting of a number of mobile touring caravans at Moons Farm, Canewdon Road, Ashingdon, Essex. 1.2 Members will need to consider whether it is expedient to serve enforcement notices, etc. and this function is discretionary. However, the mechanisms of such actions are statutorily controlled. 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The land in question is located at Moons Farm, north of Canewdon Road, Ashingdon. The caravans are stored within an area towards the north of the complex of buildings at the farm and at any time during visits there have been up to six standard size white touring caravans stored on site. 3 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 This matter was first noticed during Officer’s investigations of a different breach of planning control on the same site. It was noted that there were a number of domestic caravans stored on the site. 3.2 Contact was made with the site owners and they were invited to either remove the caravans or to apply, retrospectively for their retention. The site owner chose to apply for retrospective permission (application ref. 01/00616/FUL) to store the caravans here but, following consideration, this was refused on the grounds that the proposal was contrary to Green Belt policies. 4 PLANNING ISSUES 4.1 The site is situated within the Metropolitan Green Belt and as such there is a general presumption against development.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSEX. [ KELLY's PROVISION Dealers-Continued
    506 PRO ESSEX. [ KELLY'S PROVISION DEALERs-continued. Weir Alfred, Harrow rd. Leytonstone e Patchett John, St. James' street, Wal- Pegrum Christopher Wm. J<'ranchise Woolley Arthur Henry, Chigwell road, thamstow place, Waltham abbey ChigweIl; & at Abridge Pitman & Binnington, St. James' street, Potter Waiter Thomas, 48 Leyton road, Walthamstow New town, Stratford e PROVISION MERCHANTS Proud Richd. B. King's road, Brentwood Poupard Albert Geo.6 Park rd. Leyton . Sanders Evatt &~on, 31 &: 32 High street Reeve Jas. Holloway rd. Leytonstone e Campin Mrs. Susannah, Snakes lane, & St. Botolph street, Colchester Richer Harry, High street, Leyton Woodford Scott Edwin, I Long Wyre st. Colchester Rist David, High street, Brentwood Coppin & Son, 27 & 28 Springfield road, Scruby Joseph, High street, Romford Rist lsaac, High street, Brentwood Springfield, Chelmsford SimpsonWilliam, 76 High street, Chelms- Rolfe HY.1-2 Hoscal st. Canning town e Cottee Mark, Purleigh, Maldon ford; & High street, Maldon Scholding G. Ramsden Crays, Brentwood Darby Charles Daniel, 29 Moulsham st. 'fabram & Jones,40 &41 Highst.Colchstr Seears James, High street, Leyton Chelmsford; & 18 Springfield road, Ward SI. Hall rd. ter. Heybridge, Maldon Shrimpton Chas. Beaumont rd. Leyton Springfield, Chelmsford Sims Harry, Rochford S.O Direct Supply Association, Limited, 9 PUBLIC COMPANIES. Sinclair Richd. Brickfields, West Ham e Maryland ter. Lytonstne. rd.Stratfrd e Billericay Town Hall Co. Lim. (Edward Smith Ellis, 73 Bidder st. Canning town e Drake Francis, Witham Woodard, sec.), Billericay, Brentwood Smith Henry, Dagenham, Romford Frank Richard Rigg, Queen's road, Chelmsford Corn Exchange Co. Lim. (W. Spring Charles Hy. North Woolwich e Buckhurst hill W. Duflield, sec.), 96 Bigh st.Chlmsfrd SquirrelI Benjamin, Axe street, Barking Glover Henry, 5 & 6 Wood street, Wal- Clacton-on-Sea Hall & Library Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Essex
    Ashingdon, Essex Record ID 588 Authors Year Wilkinson, T. and Murphy, P. 1995 Location description Deposit location Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available No Notes Subsite details ID 190 Location Depth TQ 8489 9614 Description Crouch Site 40. Upper Peat. Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 65 ID 191 Location Depth TQ 8391 9621 Description Crouch Site 41. Lower Peat. Bibliographic reference Wilkinson, T. and Murphy, P. 1995 'The archaeology of the Essex coast, Volume 1: The Hullbridge survey', East Anglian Archaeology, 71, 238pp. Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 2 of 65 Aveley Marshes, Essex Record ID 340 Authors Year Wilkinson, T. and Murphy, P. 1995 Location description Deposit location TQ 5445 7871 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Site T2. Single bed of wood peat, outcropping at or just below OD. 1 m thick - trunks and roots of ash, alder, yew. Associated artefacts Early work In clay layer below peat are Neolithic artefacts (axes). Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 249 Laboratory code Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description Base of peat. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3910 ± 70 BP Notes Bibliographic reference Wilkinson, T. and Murphy, P. 1995 'The archaeology of the Essex coast, Volume 1: The Hullbridge survey', East Anglian Archaeology, 71, 238pp. Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 3 of 65 Barling Magna, Essex Record ID 595 Authors Year Wilkinson, T. and Murphy, P. 1995 Location description Deposit location Paglesham Reach TQ 9185 9054 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Roach Context 4.
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Update
    PLANNING POLICY SUB-COMMITTEE Item 7 – 31 January 2019 NEW LOCAL PLAN EVIDENCE BASE: SOUTH ESSEX GYPSY AND TRAVELLER ACCOMMODATION ASSESSMENT (SEGTAA) UPDATE 2019 1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The Council is at the early stages of reviewing its adopted local development plan policies. To inform this review, the Council has supported the preparation of a common evidence base with other Essex authorities to inform cross- boundary co-operation. An Essex-wide Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) was prepared in 2017, which provided evidence on needs up to 2033. A further update, the South Essex Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (SEGTAA), specifically for the six South Essex authorities, was commissioned to update the needs assessment to 2038 to align with the plan period of the South Essex Joint Strategic Plan. This report explains the key findings for this piece of evidence, as well as the implications for Rochford District’s plan-making. 2 INTRODUCTION National Policy 2.1 The Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS) 2015 sets out national policy for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Show People. The PPTS requires Local Planning Authorities through the plan-making process to develop evidence which assesses the need for sites, including transit sites. Policy B sets out that, in the preparation of their Local Plans, local planning authorities should:- a) identify and update annually, a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide 5 years’ worth of sites against their locally set targets; b) identify a supply
    [Show full text]