DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecography ECOG-05013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecography ECOG-05013 Ecography ECOG-05013 Aikio, S., Ramula, S., Muola, A. and von Numers, M. 2020. Island properties dominate species traits in determining plant colonizations in an archipelago system. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.05013 Supplementary material Supplementary material Appendix 1 Fig. A1. Pairwise relationships and correlation coefficients of the island variables in the AIC- simplified model. 1 Fig. A2. Pairwise relationships and correlation coefficients of the plant traits in the AIC- simplified model. 2 Dispersal_vector [wind_water] Dispersal_vector [endozoochor] Dispersal_vector [unspecialised] Historical_total_log Pollen_vector [abiotic_insect] Life_form [herb] Dispersal_vector [myrmerochor] Dispersal_vector [epizoochor] Area_log Plant_height_log Limestone [Yes] Convolution Buffer_2_km_log Life_cycle [short] Seed_mass_log Veg_repr [Yes] North_limit Seed_bank [transient] Ellenberg_Nitrogen Ellenberg_Moisture Residents_per_area_log Ellenberg_Temperature Ellenberg_Reaction Shannon_habitats Shore_meadow Deciduous_forest Mixed_forest Marsh Buffer_5_km_log Buildings Euref_X Meadow_or_pasture Euref_Y Eklund_culture SLA Ellenberg_Light Coniferous_forest Sand Open_rock_or_bare_ground Seed_bank [unknown] Apomictic [Yes] Life_form [woody] Pollen_vector [insect] Pollen_vector [abiotic_self] Dist_to_historical_log Pollen_vector [self] Pollen_vector [insect_self] 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Odds Ratio Fig. A3. Odds ratios (i.e., exp[parameter estimate]) and 95% confidence intervals for the fixed effects of the colonization model (full model of all 587 species with partially incomplete data). A positive value for which the confidence interval does not overlap zero indicates that the variable increases colonization probability. See Tables 1 and 2 for descriptions of variables. 3 species Potential_islands Num_colonized Prop_colonized Random_effect Acer platanoides 464 17 0.036637931 NA Achillea millefolium 149 34 0.228187919 -0.480318601 Achillea ptarmica 456 67 0.146929825 1.988058033 Actaea spicata 456 12 0.026315789 -0.721749503 Adoxa moschatellina 447 6 0.013422819 -1.106237668 Aegopodium podagraria 465 4 0.008602151 NA Agrimonia eupatoria 385 32 0.083116883 -0.734147284 Agrimonia odorata 469 1 0.002132196 NA Agrostis canina 331 73 0.220543807 0.217468552 Agrostis capillaris 117 32 0.273504274 -0.175905052 Agrostis stolonifera 11 4 0.363636364 -0.232337118 Alchemilla filicaulis ssp. filicaulis 455 0 0 NA Alchemilla glaucescens 463 2 0.004319654 NA Alchemilla monticola 466 1 0.002145923 NA Alchemilla sp 449 2 0.004454343 NA Alchemilla subcrenata 468 2 0.004273504 NA Alisma plantago-aquatica 468 2 0.004273504 NA Alliaria petiolata 469 1 0.002132196 NA Allium oleraceum 405 26 0.064197531 -0.663753352 Allium schoenoprasum 56 35 0.625 1.245173729 Allium scorodoprasum 458 12 0.026200873 -0.399988191 Allium ursinum 467 1 0.002141328 NA Alnus glutinosa 133 50 0.37593985 NA Alopecurus aequalis 445 6 0.013483146 -1.008689874 Alopecurus arundinaceus 398 76 0.190954774 NA Alopecurus geniculatus 428 4 0.009345794 -1.73677429 Alopecurus pratensis 448 26 0.058035714 0.302708749 Anagallis minima 470 2 0.004255319 NA Anchusa arvensis 471 0 0 NA Anemone nemorosa 441 11 0.024943311 NA Angelica archangelica ssp. litoralis 171 139 0.812865497 0.982736576 Angelica sylvestris 125 61 0.488 NA Antennaria dioeca 301 8 0.026578073 -1.460919797 Anthemis arvensis 470 0 0 NA Anthemis tinctoria 471 1 0.002123142 NA Anthoxanthum odoratum 224 19 0.084821429 NA Anthriscus sylvestris 176 60 0.340909091 -0.418305478 Arabidopsis thaliana 71 42 0.591549296 1.214554461 Arabis glabra 364 51 0.14010989 -0.196474805 Arabis hirsuta 397 22 0.055415617 NA Arctium minus 468 2 0.004273504 NA Arctium tomentosum 471 3 0.006369427 NA Arctium vulgare 466 3 0.006437768 NA Arctostaphylos uva ursi 453 10 0.022075055 0.202318404 Arenaria serpyllifolia 388 21 0.054123711 NA Armoracia rusticana 471 1 0.002123142 NA Arrhenatherum elatius 348 54 0.155172414 -0.735336989 Artemisia absinthium 465 0 0 NA Artemisia campestris 386 45 0.116580311 -0.538392359 Artemisia vulgaris var. coarctata 457 144 0.315098468 NA Artemisia vulgaris var. vulgaris 469 30 0.063965885 2.12822156 Asperugo procumbens 465 2 0.004301075 NA Asplenium ruta muraria 468 0 0 NA Asplenium septentrionale 424 19 0.044811321 NA Asplenium trichomanes 444 10 0.022522523 NA Aster tripolium 362 233 0.643646409 1.793887434 Athyrium filix-femina 378 74 0.195767196 NA Atriplex littoralis 464 51 0.109913793 1.770415788 Atriplex longipes ssp. praecox 45 27 0.6 NA Atriplex patula 463 1 0.002159827 NA Atriplex prostrata 429 188 0.438228438 1.764848688 Avenula pratensis 469 3 0.006396588 NA Avenula pubescens 292 31 0.106164384 -0.782000759 Barbaraea stricta 323 63 0.19504644 NA Barbaraea vulgaris 470 1 0.00212766 NA Betula pubescens 285 104 0.364912281 0.035454658 Betula verrucosa 450 53 0.117777778 NA Bidens tripartita 467 3 0.006423983 NA Bistorta vivipara 470 0 0 NA Blysmus compressus 470 0 0 NA Blysmus rufus 459 1 0.002178649 -1.236321261 Bolboschoenus maritimus 469 26 0.0554371 NA Botrychium boreale 471 1 0.002123142 NA Botrychium lanceolatum 468 2 0.004273504 NA Botrychium lunaria 439 12 0.027334852 NA Botrychium matricariifolium 470 1 0.00212766 NA Brachypodium pinnatum 470 3 0.006382979 NA Brassica rapa ssp. oleifera 470 0 0 NA Briza media 415 8 0.019277108 -1.05396947 Bromus hordeaceus 419 15 0.035799523 -0.456459598 Cakile maritima ssp. baltica 447 7 0.015659955 -0.733400117 Calamagrostis arundinacea 469 0 0 NA Calamagrostis canescens 461 27 0.05856833 0.441565725 Calamagrostis epigejos 130 34 0.261538462 -0.505006807 Calamagrostis purpurea 469 2 0.004264392 NA Calamagrostis stricta 402 33 0.082089552 NA Calla palustris 466 1 0.002145923 NA Callitriche palustris 351 63 0.179487179 -0.115448347 Calluna vulgaris 161 32 0.198757764 -0.115955399 Caltha palustris 438 15 0.034246575 NA Calystegia sepium ssp. sepium 464 19 0.040948276 0.159158991 Campanula persicifolia 409 37 0.090464548 0.165493413 Campanula rapunculoides 471 1 0.002123142 NA Campanula rotundifolia 381 23 0.060367454 -0.649918103 Campanula trachelium 470 0 0 NA Capsella bursa pastoris 444 13 0.029279279 -0.097701529 Cardamine hirsuta 166 48 0.289156627 -0.109890361 Cardamine impatiens 471 1 0.002123142 NA Cardamine pratensis ssp. paludosa 470 3 0.006382979 NA Cardamine pratensis ssp. pratensis 445 7 0.015730337 NA Carex acuta 467 6 0.012847966 NA Carex brunnescens 468 0 0 NA Carex buxbaumii 470 1 0.00212766 NA Carex canescens 82 48 0.585365854 NA Carex capillaris 467 0 0 NA Carex cespitosa 469 0 0 NA Carex demissa 468 3 0.006410256 NA Carex diandra 470 1 0.00212766 NA Carex digitata 461 10 0.021691974 0.374993214 Carex disticha 450 16 0.035555556 0.336919014 Carex echinata 454 24 0.052863436 0.829798627 Carex elata 471 9 0.01910828 NA Carex elongata 464 4 0.00862069 NA Carex flacca 470 0 0 NA Carex flava 469 0 0 NA Carex glareosa 445 1 0.002247191 NA Carex lasiocarpa 464 2 0.004310345 NA Carex limosa 468 1 0.002136752 NA Carex loliacea 469 0 0 NA Carex mackenziei 467 1 0.002141328 NA Carex magellanica 430 39 0.090697674 0.64024092 Carex muricata 327 31 0.094801223 -0.993761424 Carex nigra ssp. nigra 20 8 0.4 0.6146111 Carex ovalis 341 24 0.070381232 -0.662477897 Carex pallescens 318 10 0.031446541 -1.806692764 Carex panicea 191 28 0.146596859 -0.596201081 Carex pilulifera 345 19 0.055072464 -0.994517747 Carex pseudocyperus 469 4 0.008528785 NA Carex pulicaris 470 0 0 NA Carex rostrata 454 25 0.055066079 0.627061872 Carex spicata 354 44 0.124293785 -0.395557019 Carex vesicaria 401 77 0.19201995 0.746992147 Carex viridula var. pulchella 328 51 0.155487805 NA Carlina vulgaris 470 3 0.006382979 NA Carum carvi 444 3 0.006756757 -1.222993647 Centaurea cyanus 468 1 0.002136752 NA Centaurea jacea 407 35 0.085995086 NA Centaurium littorale 397 181 0.455919395 2.160485873 Centaurium pulchellum 357 98 0.274509804 0.806749872 Cephalanthera longifolia 470 0 0 NA Cerastium arvense 471 1 0.002123142 NA Cerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare 109 24 0.220183486 -0.341792363 Cerastium glutinosum 418 11 0.026315789 -0.326496873 Cerastium semidecandrum 373 6 0.016085791 NA Chelidonium majus 468 6 0.012820513 NA Chenopodium album 454 14 0.030837004 0.000335643 Circaea alpina 467 1 0.002141328 NA Cirsium arvense var. arvense 395 162 0.410126582 1.205303425 Cirsium helenioides 470 3 0.006382979 NA Cirsium palustre 429 27 0.062937063 -0.211931914 Cirsium vulgare 124 21 0.169354839 -0.976259361 Cochlearia danica 274 41 0.149635036 -0.449858224 Coeloglossum viride 470 0 0 NA Convallaria majalis 360 83 0.230555556 0.421223917 Cornus suecica 335 54 0.16119403 0.219446293 Corylus avellana 444 23 0.051801802 -0.637157058 Cotoneaster scandinavicus 462 1 0.002164502 NA Crambe maritima 423 65 0.153664303 0.384588519 Crassula aquatica 446 2 0.004484305 NA Crataegus monogyna 467 0 0 NA Crataegus rhibidophylla 467 2 0.004282655 NA Crepis tectorum 303 53 0.174917492 NA Cuscuta europaea ssp. halophyta 471 1 0.002123142 NA Cystopteris fragilis ssp. Fragilis 362 39 0.107734807 NA Dactylis glomerata 412 13 0.031553398 -1.308323083 Dactylorhiza maculata ssp. maculata 442 20 0.045248869 0.228390821 Dactylorhiza sambucina 450 5 0.011111111 -0.488278474 Danthonia decumbens 319 55 0.172413793 0.230113101 Daphne mezereum 466 1 0.002145923 NA Dentaria bulbifera 454 10 0.022026432 NA Deschampsia bottnica 184 75 0.407608696 NA Deschampsia caespitosa 283 28 0.098939929 -1.003840955 Deschampsia flexuosa 23 12 0.52173913 1.044894077 Dianthus deltoides 447 21 0.046979866 0.623892261 Diphasiastrum complanatum 471 0 0 NA Draba incana 421 25 0.059382423 NA Draba muralis 452 9 0.019911504 -0.463216115 Drosera intermedia 470 0 0 NA Drosera longifolia 470 0 0 NA Drosera rotundifolia 423 20 0.047281324 -0.237221839 Dryopteris carthusiana 94 45 0.478723404 NA Dryopteris cristata 468 2 0.004273504 NA Dryopteris dilatata 325 82 0.252307692 NA Dryopteris filix-mas 129 63 0.488372093 NA Echium vulgare 471 2 0.004246285 NA Eleocharis acicularis 471 1 0.002123142 NA Eleocharis mamillata 377 73 0.193633952 NA Eleocharis palustris coll.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposal for Plot Based Plant Phenology Sampling in Puale Bay, Alaska (Adapted from Long Term Ecological Monitoring Program, Vegetation Sampling Protocols 2006)
    Plant Phenology Puale Bay 2010 Proposal for Plot Based Plant Phenology Sampling in Puale Bay, Alaska (Adapted from Long Term Ecological Monitoring Program, Vegetation Sampling Protocols 2006) Stacey E. Pecen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Peninsula/Becharof NWR, P.O. Box 277, King Salmon, AK 99613 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Phenology, the timing of major biological events during a plant or animal’s life, can be monitored to detect changes in climate. Major events are called phenophases: leaf emergence, flowering, fruit ripening, and senescing. According to Menzel and Estrella (2001), plant phenology studies have shown that the average growing season is increasing by 0.2 days/year. It is especially important to monitor changes in higher latitudes, such as Alaska, where global warming is expected to occur earlier and at a greater magnitude (Henry and Molau 1997). The Northern Hemisphere (above 40o N) has experienced an increase in temperature of at least 0.5oC/decade from 1966-1995 (Serreze et al. 2000, Euskirchen et al. 2009). Monitoring species abundance and diversity is also vital. Environmental conditions dictate the composition of plant communities. Changes can occur over time, disrupting the balance of these interactions. In a nine year study at Toolik Lake, AK, Chapin et al. (1995) found that species richness declined 30-50% when the mean temperature was increased by 3.5˚C. Forbs and grasses decreased in abundance while woody species, such as Betula spp., increased. Changes in species abundance in regions of the arctic, as a result of warming, were also noted by Euskirchen et al. (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithocoprophilous Plants of Mount Desert Rock, a Remote Bird-Nesting Island in the Gulf of Maine, U.S.A
    RHODORA, Vol. 111, No. 948, pp. 417–447, 2009 E Copyright 2009 by the New England Botanical Club ORNITHOCOPROPHILOUS PLANTS OF MOUNT DESERT ROCK, A REMOTE BIRD-NESTING ISLAND IN THE GULF OF MAINE, U.S.A. NISHANTA RAJAKARUNA Department of Biological Sciences, San Jose´ State University, One Washington Square, San Jose´, CA 95192-0100 e-mail: [email protected] NATHANIEL POPE AND JOSE PEREZ-OROZCO College of the Atlantic, 105 Eden Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609 TANNER B. HARRIS University of Massachusetts, Fernald Hall, 270 Stockbridge Road, Amherst, MA 01003 ABSTRACT. Plants growing on seabird-nesting islands are uniquely adapted to deal with guano-derived soils high in N and P. Such ornithocoprophilous plants found in isolated, oceanic settings provide useful models for ecological and evolutionary investigations. The current study explored the plants foundon Mount Desert Rock (MDR), a small seabird-nesting, oceanic island 44 km south of Mount Desert Island (MDI), Hancock County, Maine, U.S.A. Twenty-seven species of vascular plants from ten families were recorded. Analyses of guano- derived soils from the rhizosphere of the three most abundant species from bird- 2 nesting sites of MDR showed significantly higher (P , 0.05) NO3 , available P, extractable Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn, and significantly lower Mn compared to soils from the rhizosphere of conspecifics on non-bird nesting coastal bluffs from nearby MDI. Bio-available Pb was several-fold higher in guano soils than for background levels for Maine. Leaf tissue elemental analyses from conspecifics on and off guano soils showed significant differences with respect to N, Ca, K, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Pb, although trends were not always consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Lineages Within Apiaceae Subfamily Apioideae: a Comparison of Chloroplast Restriction Site and Dna Sequence Data1
    American Journal of Botany 86(7): 1014±1026. 1999. MAJOR LINEAGES WITHIN APIACEAE SUBFAMILY APIOIDEAE: A COMPARISON OF CHLOROPLAST RESTRICTION SITE AND DNA SEQUENCE DATA1 GREGORY M. PLUNKETT2 AND STEPHEN R. DOWNIE Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Traditional sources of taxonomic characters in the large and taxonomically complex subfamily Apioideae (Apiaceae) have been confounding and no classi®cation system of the subfamily has been widely accepted. A restriction site analysis of the chloroplast genome from 78 representatives of Apioideae and related groups provided a data matrix of 990 variable characters (750 of which were potentially parsimony-informative). A comparison of these data to that of three recent DNA sequencing studies of Apioideae (based on ITS, rpoCl intron, and matK sequences) shows that the restriction site analysis provides 2.6± 3.6 times more variable characters for a comparable group of taxa. Moreover, levels of divergence appear to be well suited to studies at the subfamilial and tribal levels of Apiaceae. Cladistic and phenetic analyses of the restriction site data yielded trees that are visually congruent to those derived from the other recent molecular studies. On the basis of these comparisons, six lineages and one paraphyletic grade are provisionally recognized as informal groups. These groups can serve as the starting point for future, more intensive studies of the subfamily. Key words: Apiaceae; Apioideae; chloroplast genome; restriction site analysis; Umbelliferae. Apioideae are the largest and best-known subfamily of tem, and biochemical characters exhibit similarly con- Apiaceae (5 Umbelliferae) and include many familiar ed- founding parallelisms (e.g., Bell, 1971; Harborne, 1971; ible plants (e.g., carrot, parsnips, parsley, celery, fennel, Nielsen, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX for 2011 HERBALPEDIA Abelmoschus Moschatus—Ambrette Seed Abies Alba—Fir, Silver Abies Balsamea—Fir, Balsam Abies
    INDEX FOR 2011 HERBALPEDIA Acer palmatum—Maple, Japanese Acer pensylvanicum- Moosewood Acer rubrum—Maple, Red Abelmoschus moschatus—Ambrette seed Acer saccharinum—Maple, Silver Abies alba—Fir, Silver Acer spicatum—Maple, Mountain Abies balsamea—Fir, Balsam Acer tataricum—Maple, Tatarian Abies cephalonica—Fir, Greek Achillea ageratum—Yarrow, Sweet Abies fraseri—Fir, Fraser Achillea coarctata—Yarrow, Yellow Abies magnifica—Fir, California Red Achillea millefolium--Yarrow Abies mariana – Spruce, Black Achillea erba-rotta moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies religiosa—Fir, Sacred Achillea moschata—Yarrow, Musk Abies sachalinensis—Fir, Japanese Achillea ptarmica - Sneezewort Abies spectabilis—Fir, Himalayan Achyranthes aspera—Devil’s Horsewhip Abronia fragrans – Sand Verbena Achyranthes bidentata-- Huai Niu Xi Abronia latifolia –Sand Verbena, Yellow Achyrocline satureoides--Macela Abrus precatorius--Jequirity Acinos alpinus – Calamint, Mountain Abutilon indicum----Mallow, Indian Acinos arvensis – Basil Thyme Abutilon trisulcatum- Mallow, Anglestem Aconitum carmichaeli—Monkshood, Azure Indian Aconitum delphinifolium—Monkshood, Acacia aneura--Mulga Larkspur Leaf Acacia arabica—Acacia Bark Aconitum falconeri—Aconite, Indian Acacia armata –Kangaroo Thorn Aconitum heterophyllum—Indian Atees Acacia catechu—Black Catechu Aconitum napellus—Aconite Acacia caven –Roman Cassie Aconitum uncinatum - Monkshood Acacia cornigera--Cockspur Aconitum vulparia - Wolfsbane Acacia dealbata--Mimosa Acorus americanus--Calamus Acacia decurrens—Acacia Bark Acorus calamus--Calamus
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Anleitung Für Die Geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie Die
    Anleitung für die geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie die Anwendung gestartet haben, können Sie mit den entsprechenden Werkzeugen zur gewünschten geographischen Lage finden. Im linken Auswahlmenü wählen Sie bitte "Artenfunde digitalisieren". Mit dem Button können Sie einen Punkt in die Karte setzen. Bitte beachten Sie unbedingt, dass bevor ein Punkt gesetzt wird alles geladen ist. Es müssen ungefähr 1,4 MB (Artenliste mit ca. 19.000 Arten) geladen werden. Links erscheint dann ein Disketten Symbol . Nach klick auf das Symbol erscheint ein Fenster, in dem die erforderlichen Angaben einzutragen sind. Die Felder bis „Ort des Fundes“ sind Pflichtfelder, hier müssen unbedingt Eingaben gemacht werden. 1 Die Eingabe über Autor und E-Mail des Autors sowie Bemerkungen sollten ebenso eingegeben werden. Diese Angaben werden in der Datenbank gespeichert, jedoch nicht veröffentlicht. Diese Angaben dienen intern dazu, die Wertigkeit der Eingaben beurteilen zu können. Es stehen z.B. beim "Artenname" Pulldown-Listen zur Verfügung, dadurch wird eine einheitliche Eingabe garantiert. Es stehen ca. 19.000 Arten zur Verfügung. Sollte es für eine Art keinen deutschen Namen geben, steht der wissenschaftliche Name zur Verfügung. Die Liste ist alphabetisch sortiert. Außerdem werden in der Liste keine ü,ö,ä und ß verwendet. Die Namen werden mit Umlauten geschrieben. Die vollständige Liste finden Sie im Anhang zu dieser Anleitung. Das Datum ist im Format JJJJ-MM-TT (z.B. 2012-01-27) einzugeben. Das wäre der 27. Januar 2012. Beenden Sie alle Eingaben durch drücken auf "Speichern". Während Ihrer aktuellen Internetsitzung haben Sie die Möglichkeit mit dem Button die Eingabe des Datensatzes wieder aus der Datenbank zu löschen.
    [Show full text]
  • Infestation of Field Dodder (Cuscuta Campestris Yunck.)
    plants Article Infestation of Field Dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) Promotes Changes in Host Dry Weight and Essential Oil Production in Two Aromatic Plants, Peppermint and Chamomile Marija Sari´c-Krsmanovi´c 1,*, Ana Dragumilo 2, Jelena Gaji´cUmiljendi´c 1, Ljiljana Radivojevi´c 1, Ljiljana Šantri´c 1 and Rada Ðurovi´c-Pejˇcev 1 1 Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, Banatska 31b, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (J.G.U.); [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (L.Š.); [email protected] (R.Ð.-P.) 2 Institute for Medicinal Plant Research “Dr. Josif Panˇci´c”,Tadeuša Koš´cuška1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +38-111-3076-133 Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 29 September 2020 Abstract: Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch.) are aromatic plants with considerable economic value. These plants and their essential oils are used in medicine, cosmetics, and the food industry. One of the main limiting factors in peppermint and chamomile commercial cultivation is weed competition since weeds are able to decrease both oil amount and biomass yield. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of parasitism by field dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yunck.) on peppermint and chamomile dry weight and their essential oil yield and composition. Essential oils from both noninfested and infested peppermint and chamomile plants were obtained by hydrodistillation and characterized chemically by gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). The amount of dry matter accumulated by peppermint and chamomile plants infested by field dodder was lower (25% and 63%, respectively) compared to noninfested plants.
    [Show full text]
  • NVPD-Recording-Card Coastal
    Recording card Irish Wild Flowers: Coastal habitat Date: Grid Ref: Name: Location and County: www.biodiversityireland.ie Notes: Scientific name Common Name Scientific name Common Name Scientific name Common Name Dunes Parentucellia viscosa Bartsia, yellow Limonium humile Lavender, sea Achillea millefolium Yarrow Phragmites australis Reed, common Myriophyllum spicatum Water milfoil, spiked Ammophila arenaria Marram grass Potentilla anserina Silverweed Potamogeton pectinatus Pondweed, fennel Anacamptis pyramidalis Orchid, pyramidal Salix repens Willow, creeping Puccinellia maritima Salt-marsh grass, common Anthyllis vulneraria Kidney vetch Shingle and gravel banks Ranunculus baudotii Water crow-foot Aparagus officinales ssp. prostratus Asparagus Atriplex lanciniata Orache, frosted Salicornia agg. Glassworts Asparagus officinalis subsp. officinalis Garden asparagus* Chamaemelum nobile Chamomile, common Seriphidium maritima Wormwood, sea Cakile maritima Rocket, sea Crambe maritima Kale, sea Spartina anglica Cord grass, English Calystegia soldanella Bindweed, sea Crithmum maritimum Samphire, rock Triglochin maritima Arrowgrass, sea Carex arenaria Sand sedge Glaucium flavum Poppy, yellow-horned Triglochin palustris Arrowgrass, Marsh Centaurium pulchellum Centuary, lesser Honkenya peploides Sandwort, sea Coastal general Dactylorhiza majalis Orchid, western marsh Lathyrus japonicus ssp. maritimus Pea, sea Allium ampeloprasum var. babingtonii Babingtons leek Daucus carota ssp. Gummifer Carrot, sea Mertensia maritima Oysterplant Aster tripolium
    [Show full text]
  • Horatio's Garden Plant List
    Horatio’s Garden Plant List Latin name Common name Trees Amelanchier lamarckii - multistem Snowy mespilus, Serviceberry Betula nigra - multistem River birch Buxus sempervirens - balls Box Koelreuteria paniculata (in planter) Golden rain tree, Varnish tree Hedging Cratageous monogyna Quickthorn Euonymous europaeus Spindle Rosa canina Dog rose Prunus spinosa Blackthorn Fagus sylvatica Beech Quercus rober English oak Shrubs Buddleja davidii 'Purple Emperor' Butterfly bush Osmanthus x burwoodii Osmanthus Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary Perovskia atriplicifolia 'Blue Spire' Russian sage Sarcococca confusa Sweet box Herbaceous Acanthus mollis 'Rue Ledan' Bear's breeches, Oyster plant Acaena inermis 'Purpurea' New Zealand burr Achillea 'Monpagode' Yarrow Agastache 'Black Adder' Giant hyssop Alchemilla erythropoda Lady's mantle Anemone huphensis var japonica Japanese anemone Aruncus dioicus 'Horatio' Goatsbeard Aster laterifolius 'Coombe Fishacre' Aster Blechnum spicant Hard fern, Deer fern Bupleurum perfoliatum Hare's ear Campanula trachelium var. alba Bell flower Centranthus ruber Red valerian Chamaenerion angustifolium 'Album' Rosebay willowherb Dianthus cruentus Pink Digitalis ferrugunea Rusty Foxglove Dryopteris erythrosora Autumn fern Echinacea purpurea 'White Swan' Coneflower Epimedium pinnatum subsp. colchicum Barrenwort Erigeron karvinskianus Spanish daisy Eryngium yuccifolium Button snake-root Eryngium giganteum 'Silver Ghost' Giant sea holly Eryngium planum 'Blaukappe' Sea holly Foeniculum vulgare Fennel Geranium pyrenaicum 'Bill Wallis'
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Orary
    TAXONOMY AND CULTIVAR DEVELOPMENT OF POA PRATENSIS L. David P. Byres 1 13 BOTANY ORARY PhD. University of Edinburgh 1984 1) Declaration. This thesis was composed by myself, and the work described herein is my own. David P. Byres CONTENTS Acknowledgements . • I \/ Abstract . Section A . Taxonomy. Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Introduction ..........................................1 1.2 Taxonomy .............................................1 1.3 Cultivar Development ............................... 4 Chapter 2. Literature Review : Taxonomy 2.1 Introduction ............. .............................7 2.2 History of the Taxonomic Treatment of of Poa pratensis L. s.1............ ....... 10 2.3 Taxonomic Characters used by previous workers .........14 Chapter 3. Materials and Methods. 3.1 Environmental Variation .................... 20 3.2 Population and Herbarium Studies .......... ............26 3.3 Taxonomic Analysis of Biotypes and Cultivars... ... ... 36 3.4 Statistical Analysis ..................................37 Chapter 4. Effect of Environmental Variation on Morphology. 4.1 Introduction .......................................... 38 4.2 Results ........................................ .......38 Chapter 5. Study of Poa pratensis Populations. 5.1 Introduction .......................................... 49 5.2 Results ........................ 49 Chapter 6. Study of Herbarium Material. 6.1 Introduction ......................................... 60 6.2 Results ....................... 60 Chapter 7. Morphological Examination of Biotypes and
    [Show full text]
  • THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants
    THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants T.G.F.Curtis & H.N. McGough Wildlife Service Ireland DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE 1988 ISBN 0 7076 0032 4 This version of the Red Data Book was scanned from the original book. The original book is A5-format, with 168 pages. Some changes have been made as follows: NOMENCLATURE has been updated, with the name used in the 1988 edition in brackets. Irish Names and family names have also been added. STATUS: There have been three Flora Protection Orders (1980, 1987, 1999) to date. If a species is currently protected (i.e. 1999) this is stated as PROTECTED, if it was previously protected, the year(s) of the relevant orders are given. IUCN categories have been updated as follows: EN to CR, V to EN, R to V. The original (1988) rating is given in brackets thus: “CR (EN)”. This takes account of the fact that a rare plant is not necessarily threatened. The European IUCN rating was given in the original book, here it is changed to the UK IUCN category as given in the 2005 Red Data Book listing. MAPS and APPENDIX have not been reproduced here. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are most grateful to the following for their help in the preparation of the Irish Red Data Book:- Christine Leon, CMC, Kew for writing the Preface to this Red Data Book and for helpful discussions on the European aspects of rare plant conservation; Edwin Wymer, who designed the cover and who, as part of his contract duties in the Wildlife Service, organised the computer applications to the data in an efficient and thorough manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Choice in Cuscuta Europaea (Plant Dlstbn/Nduar Autonomy/Donal Plants/Parsl Plants/Bost Dhice) COLLEEN K
    Proc. Natd. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 12194-12197, December 1992 Ecology Resource choice in Cuscuta europaea (plant dlstbn/nduar autonomy/donal plants/parsl plants/bost dhice) COLLEEN K. KELLY* Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom Communicated by Robert M. May, September 4, 1992 (receivedfor review June 30, 1992) ABSTRACT Individual stems with growing tps of dodder METHODS AND MATERIALS (Cuscuta europaea) were rnsplanted onto host plants (haw- thorn) of varying nt l statu. The p ite was more Dodder (Convolvulaceae) has no roots, only vestigial leaves, likely to coil on ("accept") hosts ofhih nutritional status and and does not photosynthesize. A stem of dodder infests its grow away from ("reject") hosts of poor qual. Dodder hosts by forming one or more loops about the host stem or leaf (a coiling bout), after which it sends pegs of absorptive exhibits this acc rejection respome befm taking up tissue (haustoria) into the host vascular system. Dodder any food from the host, so it is possible to dsole active possesses responses that may be used to effect rejection (Fig. choice from the passive effects of growth and m it. 1) and acceptance of resources. These responses are com- Probability of acceptance is gauged to expected reward. plete prior to any resource uptake and thus cannot be confused with the passive results of uptake (16). Higher plants vary in size and shape through variation in Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna) is a native host of this number or morphology ofthe repeating subunits (modules) of dodder in Great Britain (26).
    [Show full text]