DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Indigenous Knowledge Local Pathways to Global Development Marking Five Years of the World Bank Indigenous Knowledge for Development Program i © 2004 Knowledge and Learning Group Africa Region The World Bank IK Notes reports periodically on indigenous knowledge (IK) initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa and occasionally on such initiatives outside the Region. It is published by the Africa Region’s Knowledge and Learning Group as part of an evolving IK partnership between the World Bank, communities, NGOs, development institutions, and multilateral organizations. For information, please e-mail: [email protected]. The Indigenous Knowledge for Development Program can be found on the web at http://worldbank.org/afr/ik/default.htm The views and opinions expressed within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the World Bank or any of its affiliated organizations. iii Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................ vii Preface ................................................................................................................................................................................ ix Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................................ x Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................................. xi PART ONE: LEAD ARTICLES 1. Indigenous Knowledge—a Local Pathway to Global Development ................................................................................ 1 2. Indigenous Capacity Enhancement: Developing Community Knowledge ..................................................................... 4 3. Education and Indigenous Knowledge ........................................................................................................................... 9 4. Women’s Indigenous Knowledge: Building Bridges Between the Traditional and the Modern ................................... 13 5. Indigenous Responses to AIDS in Africa ..................................................................................................................... 18 6. Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods: Local Knowledge Innovations in Development................................ 24 7. Indigenous Knowledge and Natural Resource Management ....................................................................................... 30 8. Indigenous Knowledge and Science and Technology: Conflict, Contradiction or Concurrence? .................................. 34 9. Indigenous Approaches to Conflict Resolution in Africa .............................................................................................. 39 10. Indigenous Knowledge: The Way Forward .................................................................................................................. 45 References .................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Authors of the Lead Articles ........................................................................................................................................ 61 PART TWO: IK NOTES IK Notes Summaries ......................................................................................................................................................... 66 The IK Notes 1. Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Overview ....................................................................... 72 2. Zimbabwe: Sustainable Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Agriculture .................................................................... 76 3. Senegalese Women Remake their Culture .................................................................................................................. 78 4. Ghana: From“ Sacrilege ” to Sustainability—Reforestation and Organic Farming.................................................... 81 5. Burkina Faso: Literacy for the “Little Ones” in Nomgana ......................................................................................... 84 6. Senegal: Village Bankers: The Experience of Fandène ............................................................................................... 87 7. Ghana: Literacy and Local Governance in a Rural Community................................................................................. 90 8. Nurturing the Environment on Senegal’s West Coast ................................................................................................ 93 9. Mali: The Development of an Agricultural Union: Increasing Levels of Local Empowerment ................................... 95 10. Indigenous Healing of War-Affected Children in Africa .............................................................................................. 98 11. Education and Koranic Literacy in West Africa ....................................................................................................... 102 12. Mali: Cultural Resources and Maternal Health ........................................................................................................ 107 iv 13. Sahelian Languages, Indigenous Knowledge and Self-Management ......................................................................... 110 14. Grassroots Dissemination of Research in Africa: Collecting and Connecting ........................................................... 114 15. Health: Indigenous Knowledge, Equitable Benefits ................................................................................................... 117 16. Senegal: Grassroots Democracy in Action................................................................................................................. 121 17. Regional Planning, Local Visions: Participatory Futuring in West Africa ............................................................... 124 18. Participatory Management and Local Culture: Proverbs and Paradigms ................................................................ 128 19. Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights .......................................................................................... 132 20. Reinventing Apprenticeship and Rites of Passage ..................................................................................................... 135 21. Indigenous Knowledge for Development Program: Two Years Down the Road......................................................... 139 22. Indigenous Knowledge Goes to School: Potential and Perils of Community Education in the Western Sahel........................................................................................................................................... 142 23. Seeds of Life: Women and Agricultural Biodiversity in Africa .................................................................................. 146 24. Strengthening Traditional Technical Knowledge: the Sugar Cane Wine Example .................................................. 149 25. Mali: Indigenous Knowledge—Blending the New and the Old .................................................................................. 152 26. Traditional Medicine and AIDS ................................................................................................................................. 156 27. Uganda: Information Technology and Rural Development: The Nakaseke Multi-Purpose Telecenter ............................................................................................................ 158 28. Indigenous Knowledge and Local Power: Negotiating Change in West Africa ......................................................... 161 29. West African Languages: Medium and Message ....................................................................................................... 164 30. Ghana and Zambia: Indigenous Knowledge and HIV/AIDS ..................................................................................... 168 31. Malicounda-Bambara: the Sequel .............................................................................................................................. 171 32. African Traditional Healers: The Economics of Healing ........................................................................................... 175 33. Repairing the Ravages of War in Mozambique .......................................................................................................... 178 34. Tanzania: Communicating Local Farming Knowledge ............................................................................................. 181 35. Ethiopia: Traditional Medicine and the Bridge to Better Health .............................................................................. 184 36. Eritrea: The Process of Capturing Indigenous Knowledge ........................................................................................ 187 37. HIV/AIDS: Traditional Healers, Community Self-assessment, and Empowerment ................................................. 190 38. Senegal: Indigenous Language and Literature as a Non-profit Business ................................................................. 193 39. Burkina Faso: Integrating Indigenous and Scientific Rainfall Forecasting .............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mapping and Remote Sensing of the Resources of the Republic of Senegal

    Mapping and Remote Sensing of the Resources of the Republic of Senegal

    MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL SDSU-RSI-86-O 1 -Al DIRECTION DE __ Agency for International REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE L'AMENAGEMENT Development DU TERRITOIRE ..i..... MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL For THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL LE MINISTERE DE L'INTERIEUP SECRETARIAT D'ETAT A LA DECENTRALISATION Prepared by THE REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57007, USA Project Director - Victor I. Myers Chief of Party - Andrew S. Stancioff Authors Geology and Hydrology - Andrew Stancioff Soils/Land Capability - Marc Staljanssens Vegetation/Land Use - Gray Tappan Under Contract To THE UNITED STATED AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING PROJECT CONTRACT N0 -AID/afr-685-0233-C-00-2013-00 Cover Photographs Top Left: A pasture among baobabs on the Bargny Plateau. Top Right: Rice fields and swamp priairesof Basse Casamance. Bottom Left: A portion of a Landsat image of Basse Casamance taken on February 21, 1973 (dry season). Bottom Right: A low altitude, oblique aerial photograph of a series of niayes northeast of Fas Boye. Altitude: 700 m; Date: April 27, 1984. PREFACE Science's only hope of escaping a Tower of Babel calamity is the preparationfrom time to time of works which sumarize and which popularize the endless series of disconnected technical contributions. Carl L. Hubbs 1935 This report contains the results of a 1982-1985 survey of the resources of Senegal for the National Plan for Land Use and Development.
  • A Hrc Wg.6 31 Sen 1 E.Pdf

    A Hrc Wg.6 31 Sen 1 E.Pdf

    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/31/SEN/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 August 2018 English Original: French Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-first session 5–16 November 2018 National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21* Senegal I. Introduction and methodology for preparation of the report 1. This report is submitted in follow-up to the presentation of the second report of Senegal to the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review at its seventeenth session in 2013. It reflects the efforts to implement the recommendations that Senegal had accepted. 2. With technical and financial support from the Regional Office for West Africa of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, based in Dakar, the Ministry of Justice, through the National Advisory Council on Human Rights, led the process of preparing the report. The National Advisory Council on Human Rights is a standing government body, made up of representatives of all ministerial departments, of a large number of the most representative civil society organizations, and also of the national human rights institution — the Senegalese Human Rights Committee — and of Parliament. 3. A national action plan for the period 2016–2018 was drafted by a technical committee composed of focal points from key ministries, appointed by the National Advisory Council on Human Rights. The draft report was drawn up on the basis of the information that had been gathered and was then considered at a dissemination and validation workshop with the participation of national institutions and civil society.
  • Evaluation of the Impact of Food for Assets on Livelihood Resilience in Senegal (2005 – 2010)

    Evaluation of the Impact of Food for Assets on Livelihood Resilience in Senegal (2005 – 2010)

    measuring results, sharing lessons sharing measuring results, IMPACT EVALUATION Evaluation of the Impact of Food for Assets on Livelihood Resilience in Senegal (2005 – 2010) A Mixed Method Impact Evaluation Vol. I - Main Annexes January, 2014 Prepared by Le Groupe-conseil baastel Itée: Anne Fouillard, Team Leader, Chantal Lewis, Natural Resources Specialise, Mark Daku, Statistician, Khady Mgaye, Local Coordinator, A&B Consulting Commissioned by the WFP Office of Evaluation Report number: OEV/2013/009 Table of Contents Annex 1. Summary IE FFA Phase II Terms of reference ................................................... 1 Annex 2. Summary of Theory of Change and Methodology ............................................. 4 Annex 3. IE FFA in Senegal Evaluation Matrix ................................................................ 13 Annex 4. Evaluation findings, Conclusions and Recommendations .............................20 Annex 5. FFA context in Senegal past and current .......................................................... 35 Annex 5A. Past FFA implementation context in Senegal (2005-2010) ....................... 35 Annex 6. Supporting Data information from field data collection .............................. 46 Annex 6.1 Difficulties Understanding and Measuring FFA ............................................ 47 Annex 6.2 Beneficiaries of FFA and Respondents of the Evaluation’s HHS ................ 49 Annex 6.3 Land tenure and asset data ............................................................................... 51 Annex 6.4
  • PAA Africa Programme in Senegal's Kédougou Region

    PAA Africa Programme in Senegal's Kédougou Region

    Decentralized Evaluation PAA Africa programme in Senegal’s Kédougou region September 2013 – July 2016 March 2017 WFP/FAO PAA Coordination Unit Evaluation Managers: Francesco Slaviero and Enrico Cristiani Prepared by Professor Abdolaye Diagne, Evaluation Team Leader Dr Laura Solaroli, Evaluation Team Member Mr Abdolaye Ba, Evaluation Team Member, Consortium for Economic and Social Research (CRES) Acknowledgements The evaluation team wishes to acknowledge the generous support and time taken by the PAA Coordination Unit (CU) in WFP and the wider WFP staff and senior management for the role in coordinating and managing the decentralised evaluation process, with invaluable support from WFP’s Office of Evaluation (OEV). The team also addresses its most sincere gratitude to the Government of Brazil and the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) for providing the resources necessary to respectively implement the programme and carry out the evaluation. Furthermore, it is with much appreciation that we acknowledge the technical partnership of the FAO PAA Coordination Unit, FAO Office of Evaluation (OED), and the International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) and DFID, who provided support towards ensuring the high quality of the evaluation. We would like to extend our appreciation to the WFP and FAO staff in Senegal, for contributing their knowledge, time, and resources and for making the field mission possible. We acknowledge the valuable work of the team of statisticians from the Consortium for Economic and Social Research (CRES) in collecting and processing data. The Team is indebted to the Government of Senegal for its support, views, suggestions and time. We are grateful to all the local individuals and institutions that granted their valuable time and information to the Evaluation Team; their cooperation and openness provided essential contributions to the evaluation process.
  • Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014

    Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014

    REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL One People - One Goal - One Faith Republic of Senegal Final Implementation Plan November 2014 TABLE OF Section 1: General information 3 CONTENTS Section 2: Current drought situation 6 Section 3: Description of intervention activities 11 Section 4: Summary analysis 22 Section 5: Standard operating procedures 23 Annex 1: Logical frame work 27 Annex 2: Action plan 28 Instructions: Please complete the Final Implementation Plan (FIP) providing as much detail as possible. Use your Operations Plan to assist you in completing FIP. Attach any relevant documents as Annexes. As per ARC Guidelines, the FIP must be submitted at least one month before the pay-out date. It can be submitted as soon as countries are notified by ARC Ltd. that a payout is likely . Countries may consult with the ARC Secretariat before submitting their FIPs. 2 01 Name of Country: Senegal GENERAL Contact Person for Final Implementation Plan (FIP): Name and surname: Mr Massamba DIOP Telephone: (+221)77 5291562 / INFORMATION (+221) 33 821 08 11 Email: [email protected] Bank account details for receiving payout: Banque Sahelo Saharienne pour l’Investissement et le Commerce (BSIC) Place de l’Independance Dakar No Ko 100 10 60 19 47 000 13 18 Coverage period: Year : 2014 Saison: 2014/2015 Expected payout amount as of : 10 December 8 200 000 000 CFA Expected payout date: 3 1.1. Early warning (EW) activities Indeed, a Rural Survey on Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition (ERASAN) was conducted over the period 14 to 01 In 1998 the Government of Senegal established a National 27 October 2014.
  • Measuring Child Protection Outcomes in Senegal: a Population-Based Survey in Pikine and Kolda Departments

    Measuring Child Protection Outcomes in Senegal: a Population-Based Survey in Pikine and Kolda Departments

    Measuring Child Protection outcomes in Senegal: A population-based survey in Pikine and Kolda Departments April 2017 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Rationale for the Research .......................................................................................................... 13 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Phase 1- Ethnographic Research .................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Phase 2- Population-Based Survey .............................................................................................. 14 2.3 Study
  • Senegal Mapping the Poor in Senegal : Technical Report

    Senegal Mapping the Poor in Senegal : Technical Report

    REPUBLIQUE DU SENEGAL MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DU PLAN AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE LA DEMOGRAPHIE (A.N.S.D.) SENEGAL MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL : TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 MAPPING THE POOR IN SENEGAL: TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT VERSION 1. Introduction Senegal has been successful on many fronts such as social stability and democratic development; its record of economic growth and poverty reduction however has been one of mixed results. The recently completed poverty assessment in Senegal (World Bank, 2015b) shows that national poverty rates fell by 6.9 percentage points between 2001/02 and 2005/06, but subsequent progress diminished to a mere 1.6 percentage point decline between 2005/06 and 2011, from 55.2 percent in 2001 to 48.3 percent in 2005/06 to 46.7 percent in 2011. In addition, large regional disparities across the regions within Senegal exist with poverty rates decreasing from North to South (with the notable exception of Dakar). The spatial pattern of poverty in Senegal can be explained by factors such as the lack of market access and connectivity in the more isolated regions to the East and South. Inequality remains at a moderately low level on a national basis but about two-thirds of overall inequality in Senegal is due to within-region inequality and between-region inequality as a share of total inequality has been on the rise during the 2000s. As a Sahelian country, Senegal faces a critical constraint, inadequate and unreliable rainfall, which limits the opportunities in the rural economy where the majority of the population still lives to differing extents across the regions.

  • NOTES TECHNIQUES February 2017 TECHNICAL REPORTS No

    NOTES TECHNIQUES February 2017 TECHNICAL REPORTS No. 25 Socio-physical Vulnerability to Flooding in Senegal An Exploratory Analysis with New Data & Google Earth Engine Authors Bessie SCHWARZ, Beth TELLMAN, Jonathan SULLIVAN, Catherine KUHN, Richa MAHTTA, Bhartendu PANDEY, Laura HAMMETT (Cloud To Street), Gabriel PESTRE (Data-Pop Alliance) Coordination Thomas ROCA (AFD) Country Senegal Key words Data-science, Flood, Machine Learning, Satellite, Vulnerability AFD, 5 rue Roland Barthes, 75598 Paris cedex 12, France ̶ +33 1 53 44 31 31 ̶ +33 1 53 44 39 57 [email protected] ̶ http://librairie.afd.fr AUTHORS AUTHORS Bessie SCHWARZ, Beth TELLMAN, Jonathan SULLIVAN, Catherine KUHN, Richa MAHTTA, Bhartendu PANDEY, Laura HAMMETT (Cloud to Street), Gabriel PESTRE (Data-Pop Alliance) ORIGINAL LANGUAGE English ISSN 2492-2838 COPYRIGHT 1st quarter 2017 DISCLAIMER The analyses and conclusions in this document in no way reflect the views of the Agence Française de Développement or its supervisory bodies. All Technical Reports can be downloaded on AFD’s publications website: http://librairie.afd.fr 1 | TECHNICAL REPORT – N°24 – FEBRUARY 2017 Contents Contents AUTHORS ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................
  • United Nations Development Assistance Framework for the Immediate Socio-Economic Response to COVID-19: Contextualization in Senegal

    United Nations Development Assistance Framework for the Immediate Socio-Economic Response to COVID-19: Contextualization in Senegal

    United Nations development assistance framework for the immediate socio-economic response to COVID-19: Contextualization in Senegal October 2020 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMMEDIATE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESPONSE TO COVID-19 Preface In recent years, Senegal has recorded strong economic growth and significant progress in social development through the implementation of the Senegal Emergent Plan (PSE). Unfortunately, like other countries in the world and as various studies have shown, the impact of COVID-19 threatens to undermine the progress made by the country and in particular the achievement of the Goals set out in Agendas 2030 and Agenda 2063. The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a health crisis. It is also an economic, social, humanitarian, security and human rights crisis that affects us as individuals, families, communities and societies. To stem it, the Government of Senegal, under the leadership of President Macky SALL, has set up an Economic and Social Resilience Program (PRES) for very short-term actions. The magnitude of the shock resulting from this pandemic has necessitated the reorganization of development interventions through the Adjusted and Accelerated Priority Action Plan (PAP 2A) which not only provides a strengthened response to this shock, but also lays the foundations for a strong economic recovery that should keep the country on the initially adopted path of emergence. This United Nations Framework for Socio-Economic Response in Senegal is the collective contribution of the United Nations in Senegal in response to the socio-economic impact of COVID-19. The framework will put into practice the March 2020 report of the UN Secretary General “Shared responsibility, global solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19”.
  • Senegalese Education: a Focus on the Excluded PP 2,3 & 4 Child Has a Learning Potential That Must Be Valued, No Child Should Be Left Behind

    Senegalese Education: a Focus on the Excluded PP 2,3 & 4 Child Has a Learning Potential That Must Be Valued, No Child Should Be Left Behind

    FREE DISTRIBUTION EDITO Par Mamadou Mika LOM The overlooked N° 020 The overlooked FEBRUARY 2018 fromfrom schoolschool FORTNIGHTLY INFORMATION ON EDUCATION • ISSN 0880 5950 www.mondeeduc.com Exclusion - Eighteen years after the World entered the 3rd millennium, thousands of Senegalese children are still denied school enrolment. Meanwhile other children drop out without securing any diploma, and they may be kept away from schools forever. They are innocent victims THE EXCLUDED FROM EDUCATION of school exclusion, because of either limited access to school or lack of alternative or diversified educational opportunities. Sometimes this plight is imposed on these children following a parental decision. Though these parents do not consider the need to enroll their offspring as they can see the number of unemployed people roaming the streets of cities and rural areas to find any job opportunities of all kinds to improve their living TheThe extentextent ofof standards. Alert - The lessons learnt from the findings of the Jàngandoo study on school exclusion in Senegal are explicit, whether they concern regional, gender, or causal disparities. From a geographical point of view, Saint- the phenomenon Louis, Matam and Tambacounda are the regions with the the phenomenon highest number of children aged 9 to 16 who have never been in a place of learning. Kedougou and Matam top the list with high dropout rates, contrarily to Ziguinchor, Dakar or Sedhiou where the dropout rates are the lowest. Meanwhile in Louga, Diourbel or Kaffrine, this risk remains high for a child not to attend a place of learning place. Elsewhere in the regions of Kolda, Fatick, Kaolack the situation is almost similar.
  • Africa Senegal Unitary Country

    Africa Senegal Unitary Country

    AFRICA SENEGAL UNITARY COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: LOW INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: WEST AFRICAN CFA FRANC (XOF) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 196 710 km 2 (2017) GDP: 54.7 billion (current PPP international dollars), i.e. 3 450 dollars per inhabitant Population: 15.851 million inhabitants (2017), an increase of 3.0% (2017) per year (2010-2015) Real GDP growth: 7.2% (2017 vs 2016) Density: 81 inhabitants / km 2 (2017) Unemployment rate: 6.8% (2015) Urban population: 46.7% of the national population (2017) Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 532.3 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population growth: 3.8% (2017 vs 2016) Gross Fixed Capital Formation (% GDP): 24.0% Capital city: Dakar (18.4% of the national population) HDI: 0.505 (low), rank 167 (2017) Poverty rate: 38% (2011) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK The Republic of Senegal is a unitary country with a multi-party presidential regime. The current constitution was adopted in 2001. Amendments were made in 2016, including the reduction of the presidential term from 7 to 5 years and the creation of the High Council of Local and Regional Authorities (HCCT), which replaced the senate. Legislative power is vested in the National Assembly, the sole chamber of the Senegalese Parliament, established by the 1960 Act No. 60-44. Deputies are elected for five-year terms using a mixed voting system in 53 electoral districts corresponding to the 45 departments of Senegal and 8 constituencies abroad. The last parliamentary elections were held on 30 July 2017.
  • Institutions of Collective Action and Smallholder Performance: Evidence from Senegal

    Institutions of Collective Action and Smallholder Performance: Evidence from Senegal

    CHAPTER 8 Institutions of Collective Action and Smallholder Performance: Evidence from Senegal Fleur Wouterse and Amy Faye1 1 The authors would like to thank Khadim Dia for help with the data, Gian Nicola Francesconi for reading through and commenting on a previous version of this manuscript, and Mohamadou Dieye who provided some of the figures. 20202017 ReSAKSS ReSAKSS Annual Annual Trends Trends and Outlookand Outlook Report Report 87 87 enegal is a country where farming has remained largely smallholder to their attainment. However, to be able to advocate for the consideration of based. Although the country’s economy has grown by at least 6 percent producer organizations as going beyond mere channels for subsidized inputs, we Sannually since 2014 and poverty rates have declined from 45.8 percent need to assess whether membership in an organization is associated with inten- in 2003 to 23.0 percent in 2018, the agricultural growth rate has remained sification of smallholder agriculture and whether these organizations generate well below the 6.0 percent target of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture economies of scale through collective commercialization. Development Programme, and rural poverty rates have remained high In this chapter, we use recent data on almost 7,000 smallholders and 395 (ReSAKSS 2020). Due to high population growth, increased pressure on water user associations (WUAs), along with propensity score matching (PSM) land, and precarious climate conditions, rural-urban migration is high and and regression analysis, to quantitatively assess whether membership in producer 296,000 young people are said to arrive each year on the labor market, with organizations affects technical efficiency of smallholders and whether the design formal job offers estimated at only 30,000 (Ba et al.