DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco Movie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco Movie PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSLATION OF FIGURES OF SPEECH FOUND IN COCO MOVIE A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Andreas Tri Hartana Student Number: 141214156 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2018 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRACT Hartana, Andreas Tri. (2018). An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco Movie. Yogyakarta: English Language Education, Sanata Dharma University. Movie’s subtitle is a product of translation. Translation is a process of transferring the meaning from source language into the target language. Translating English subtitle is not easy, especially if the movie contains many figures of speech expressions. The translator should be aware in translating the figure of speech expressions because they cannot be translated literally. This research analyzed the types of figures of speech found in COCO movie and how acceptable the translation of the figures of speech is. The researcher chooses COCO movie because it is a new, popular and an inspiring movie. It is an animation movie, which contains figures of speech inside of it. There are two research questions. They are: (1) What types of figures of speech are found in the COCO movie? And (2) How acceptable is the translation of the figures of speech in the Indonesian subtitle? It is a qualitative research and uses document analysis technique. The researcher uses Abrams’ theory (1999) to classify the types of the figures of speech that used in the movie and for the second research question, the researcher uses Larson’s theory (1984) of the degree of acceptability translation. The researcher found 75 expressions that contain figures of speech. They are divided into 3 kinds of figures of speech, namely; 35 metaphors (47%), 32 personifications (43%) and eight litotes (10%). The researcher also analyzes the acceptability degree of the translation of the figures of speech, the researcher found 52 expressions classified as Ideal-acceptable translation (69%), 15 expressions categorized as acceptable translations (20%), 5 expressions included in Unacceptable translations (7%), and 3 expressions are failed translations (4%). As the result, the translation of the figures of speech in COCO movie are categorized as a good translation because 89% of the figures of speech are acceptable translation. Keywords: translation, figures of speech, COCO movie, subtitle. vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRAK Hartana, Andreas Tri. (2018). An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco movie. Yogyakarta: English Language Education, Sanata Dharma University. Subtitle film adalah hasil dari penerjemahan. Penerjemahan adalah sebuah proses memindahakan arti dari bahasa asal ke bahasa sasaran. Menerjemahkan subtitle berbahasa Inggris tidaklah mudah, teristimewa apabila film mengandung banyak majas. Penerjemah harus berhati-hati dalam menerjemahkan majas karena majas tidak dapat diterjemahkan secara literal. Penelitian ini menganalisis tipe-tipe majas yang digunakan dalam film berjudul COCO dan seberapa dapat diterimanya terjemahan majas yang ditemukan dalam film. Peneliti memilih film COCO karena film ini adalah film yang tergolong baru, popular dan menginspirasi. Film ini adalah sebuah film animasi, dan terdapat majas di dalamnya. Peneliti memiliki tujuan untuk menjawab dua rumusan masalah. (1) Apa saja tipe majas yang ditemukan dalam film COCO? dan (2) Bagaimana tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan majas dalam subtitle berbahasa Indonesia? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan analisis dokumen. Peneliti menggunakan teori dari Abrams (1999) untuk mengklasifikasikan tipe-tipe majas yang digunakan dalam film dan untuk rumusan masalah yang kedua, peneliti menggunakan teori Larson (1984) tentang tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan. Peneliti menemukan 64 ekspresi yang mengandung majas. Majas terbagi dalam 3 jenis, yaitu; 35 metafora (47%), 29 personifikasi (43%) dan 8 litotes (10%). Penrliti juga menganalisis tentang tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan, peneliti menemukan 52 ekspresi yang diklasifikasikan sebagai terjemahan yang diterima dengan baik (69%), 15 terjemahan diterima (20%), 5 terjemahan tidak diterima (7%) dan 3 gagal diterjemahkan (4%). Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerjemahan majas dalam film COCO dikategorikan sebagai penerjemahan yang baik karena 89% majas adalah terjemahaan yang diterima. Keywords: translation, figures of speech, COCO movie, subtitle. vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI “ I dedicated this thesis to my family, translators, English teachers and English learners. viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to express my gratitude to Jesus Christ, for his blessing and his endless grace to me. I would like thank my parents, Johanes Sujono and Anastasia Jumilah, who always accompany and give me support during my journey of life. I thank also to my brother who always support me in my good and bad times. Then, I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Laurentia Sumarni, S.Pd., M. Trans. St., for always guiding me in doing my thesis and giving motivation and suggestion. I thank her patience, kindness, happiness and everything given to me. I thank Dr. Retno Muljani, M.Pd. who guides me in Proposal Seminar class. I also thank my academic advisors, Concilianus Laos Mbato, M.A., Ed. D., and Christina Lhaksmita Anandari, Ed. M., for their guidance during my study. My gratitude also goes to all the ELESP lecturers for giving me their knowledge, especially to C. Sih Prabandari, S.Pd., M.Hum., who helps me in validating my data. I thank PBI F 2014, especially Gavrilla Albertina Tarigan, Erlia Novitasari, Fikriya Choiruna, Elizabeth Lovilla, Benedictus Pandhu, Atika Zahra, and Widyananda and who give me support in finishing my thesis. I thank also to Clara Nusaca for her support during finishing my thesis. I also thank Deo, Yosa, Ardi, Adna, Martin Sulistyo, Wendi and all member of Badminton 14 group who give me a chance to play badminton with them. ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI Lastly, I thank my friends in the thesis class, Vero, Andre, Mici, Ryan, Sani, Jessica, Clara Farida, Edo, Ully, Elan, and Martin Zai, who struggle together with me in writing thesis. I would also say thanks to those names I cannot mention one by one. Andreas Tri Hartana x PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................ i APPROVAL PAGES .................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ............................................. iv PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI .............................................. v ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. vi ABSTRAK ..................................................................................................... vii DEDICATION PAGE ................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. xi LIST OF TABLE S ........................................................................................ xiii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... xiv LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................... xv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 A. Research Background.................................................................. 1 B. Research Questions ..................................................................... 2 C. Research Significance ............................................................... 3 D. Definition of Terms ..................................................................... 4 CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ...................... 5 A. Theoretical Description ............................................................... 5 1. Theories of Figurative Languages ......................................... 5 a. Metaphor ......................................................................... 6 b. Personification................................................................. 8 c. Litotes .............................................................................. 9 2. Theories of Translation ......................................................... 9 a. Definition of Translation ................................................ 10 b. Kinds of Translation ...................................................... 11 c. Translation Method ......................................................... 11 xi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI d. Criteria of Good Translation .......................................... 13 3. Theories of Subtitling .. ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University Interscholastic League Literary Criticism Contest • Invitational a • 2021
    University Interscholastic League Literary Criticism Contest • Invitational A • 2021 Part 1: Knowledge of Literary Terms and of Literary History 30 items (1 point each) 1. A line of verse consisting of five feet that char- 6. The repetition of initial consonant sounds or any acterizes serious English language verse since vowel sounds in successive or closely associated Chaucer's time is known as syllables is recognized as A) hexameter. A) alliteration. B) pentameter. B) assonance. C) pentastich. C) consonance. D) tetralogy. D) resonance. E) tetrameter. E) sigmatism. 2. The trope, one of Kenneth Burke's four master 7. In Greek mythology, not among the nine daugh- tropes, in which a part signifies the whole or the ters of Mnemosyne and Zeus, known collectively whole signifies the part is called as the Muses, is A) chiasmus. A) Calliope. B) hyperbole. B) Erato. C) litotes. C) Polyhymnia. D) synecdoche. D) Urania. E) zeugma. E) Zoe. 3. Considered by some to be the most important Irish 8. A chronicle, usually autobiographical, presenting poet since William Butler Yeats, the poet and cele- the life story of a rascal of low degree engaged brated translator of the Old English folk epic Beo- in menial tasks and making his living more wulf who was awarded the 1995 Nobel Prize for through his wit than his industry, and tending to Literature is be episodic and structureless, is known as a (n) A) Samuel Beckett. A) epistolary novel. B) Seamus Heaney. B) novel of character. C) C. S. Lewis. C) novel of manners. D) Spike Milligan. D) novel of the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear AP Literature Students
    Dear AP Literature Students: Welcome! I’m excited to meet you in the fall and to revel in the amazing reading! Before you return to school in August, please complete the following work to get our conversation started: 1. Carefully read and annotate All the Pretty Horses by Cormac McCarthy and Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. When you read McCarthy, I would recommend bookmarking this page as it provides translations of the Spanish: http://cormacmccarthy.cookingwithmarty.com/wp- content/uploads/ATPHTrans.pdf. 2. Next, watch the animated film Persepolis (based on the graphic novel by Marjane Satrapi) and think about how it connects to our summer reading and why. You can rent it on Netflix or Amazon or possibly check it out at your local library. Yes, it is in French with subtitles J 3. Lastly, actively study the vocabulary lists "Literary Allusions" and "Literary Terms" (both in this packet). I would recommend not passively memorizing flashcards or a Quizlet, but instead using the words in your everyday conversations and in your writing to secure them in your memory and into your own personal lexicon! On the first day of AP week, you will be tested on the summer work. The test on the works of fiction will be primarily objective rather than interpretive, and it will include quotation identification, plot and setting points, and character descriptions. The test on the vocabulary will be matching. The point of the test is to ensure that you have read actively and studied the vocabulary so that you can use the works and words immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pragmatic Study of Litotes in Trump's Political Speeches
    International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 11, Issue 3, 2020 A Pragmatic Study of Litotes in Trump's Political Speeches Wafaa Mokhlosa, Ali Abdulkareem Mukheefb*, a,bUniversity of Babylon, Iraq, Email: b*[email protected] Litotes is defined as a figure of speech by which the affirmative is expressed by denying its contrary. The current study is concerned with identifying and analysing litotes in Donald Trump's political speeches on pragmatic level. The study aims at identifying the illocutionary force of litotes, the functions of litotes, which maxim of Grice is mainly breached in the production of litotes to produce implicature, and which type of litotes is heavily used by Trump. The analysis is curried out on data consists of four texts from Trump's speeches during being president from 2016 to 2019. The study concludes that the illocutionary force of litotes in most of the times is asserting. Litotes is used mainly to fulfil the function of emphasis, but it can be used to perform the functions of encouraging and inciting. Trump uses contrary litotes in most of his speeches. Key words: Pragmatics, Litotes, Illocutionary force, Implicature, Functions. Introduction Politicians use different strategies and devices to convince their audience or gain their support. Figurative language is one of these strategies that are mainly based on the use of certain figures of speech such as irony, euphemism, metaphor, litotes etc. according to Griffiths (2006:81). Understanding figurative language requires a great interaction between semantics and pragmatics. Therefore, to understand the meaning of certain figure of speech a total knowledge of the context is required.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Alliteration, Consonance and Assonance 2. Allusion 3. Analogy 4. Apostrophe
    A Few Literary and Poetic Devices: (words underlined in bold represent “figurative” language) 1. Alliteration, consonance and assonance • The repetition of sounds where consonance uses consonants and assonance uses vowels Ex. From “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore— While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping, As of someone gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door. “’Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door— Only this and nothing more.” 2. Allusion • a literary device in which an author uses subject matter refer to an event, place, or other work – usually not directly stated • An indirect reference to a piece of knowledge not explicitly mentioned in the text, e.g. “Chocolate was her Achilles Heel” Ex. When Nature sleeps and stars are mute, To mar the silence ev’n with lute. At rest on ocean’s brilliant dyes An image of Elysium lies:” 3. Analogy • A literary device that creates a relationship based on parallels or connections between two ideas. By establishing this relationship, the new idea is introduced through a familiar comparison, thus making the new concept easier to grasp. Analogy is more extensive and elaborate than either a simile or a metaphor. Ex. From Romeo and Juliet “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet. So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called,” 4. Apostrophe • An apostrophe used in literature is an arrangement of words addressing a non-existent person or an abstract idea in such a way as if it were present and capable of understanding feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • Litotes in Analects 2
    Litotes in The Analects: Form and Function YingYuanRandyAllenHarris Aug 12-14 University of Waterloo Outline • Why single out litotes? • How to justify its definition & classification? • How litotes function in The Analects? • Is litotes processible by computer? • Why single out litts • A universal figure active in many languages and classics • Greek, Latin, German, English, Chinese, French,, Dutch, Old Norse,… • Homer’s Iliad, Odyssey; Thucydides’s History Cicero’s Brutus, De Oratore; Kafkas’ Das Schloss, More’s Utopia, King Richard III; The Analects, Xunzi… • Why single out litts (con.) • Scanty researches in contemporary time • dozens of closely related articles (from1930 till now) • a couple of monographs • What is litotes? • Definitions from dictionaries Def Definitions from big dictionaries Definitions from big of speech in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite. (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language) Definition 1: A figure of speech in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite. (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language) A figure of speech, in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of the contrary (‘A citizen of no mean city’) (The Oxford English Dictionary) Understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of the contrary ( “ He is not a bad ball player.” ) (Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language) A figure of speech in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite. (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language) • Definitions from monographs & proceedings • The figure of speech by which a (nearly always) evaluative expression is periphrased by the negation of its opposite.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Meaning an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics
    Analyzing meaning An introduction to semantics and pragmatics Paul R. Kroeger language Textbooks in Language Sciences 5 science press Textbooks in Language Sciences Editors: Stefan Müller, Martin Haspelmath Editorial Board: Claude Hagège, Marianne Mithun, Anatol Stefanowitsch, Foong Ha Yap In this series: 1. Müller, Stefan. Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. 2. Schäfer, Roland. Einführung in die grammatische Beschreibung des Deutschen. 3. Freitas, Maria João & Ana Lúcia Santos (eds.). Aquisição de língua materna e não materna: Questões gerais e dados do português. 4. Roussarie, Laurent. Sémantique formelle : Introduction à la grammaire de Montague. 5. Kroeger, Paul. Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. ISSN: 2364-6209 Analyzing meaning An introduction to semantics and pragmatics Paul R. Kroeger language science press Paul R. Kroeger. 2018. Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (Textbooks in Language Sciences 5). Berlin: Language Science Press. This title can be downloaded at: http://langsci-press.org/catalog/144 © 2018, Paul R. Kroeger Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (CC BY 4.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN: 978-3-96110-034-7 (Digital) 978-3-96110-035-4 (Hardcover) 978-3-96110-067-5 (Softcover) ISSN: 2364-6209 DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1164112 Source code available from www.github.com/langsci/144 Collaborative reading: paperhive.org/documents/remote?type=langsci&id=144 Cover and concept of design:
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Figuring Jesus: the Power of Rhetorical Figures Of
    ABSTRACT Figuring Jesus: The Power of Rhetorical Figures of Speech in the Gospel of Luke Keith A. Reich, Ph.D. Mentor: Mikeal C. Parsons, Ph.D. This dissertation examines Luke’s use of rhetorical figures of speech on the lips of Jesus as a means of persuading his audience to accept a role-reversing message that challenged the social, religious, economic and political systems in the Roman Empire. A figure of speech is the use of either words or thoughts in a way that is uncommon or out of the ordinary. Because figures of speech are the “uncommon” use of language, they stand out to an audience and grab their attention. They are an artful ordering of words designed to be powerful, memorable, and to seize attention. This dissertation takes seriously the adage that says, “It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it.” The form of the Lukan Jesus’ speech is just as important as the content of that speech. To ignore the form of Jesus’ speech is to ignore the power and persuasiveness of his message. Luke uses figures of speech in various ways to persuade his audience of the gospel message. He uses figures of speech to fulfill the stylistic virtues of clarity and ornamentation. Fulfilling these stylistic virtues makes the Lukan Jesus’ argument easy to follow and impressive, serving as an ethos argument to portray Jesus as one who speaks like the social elites. Further, Luke uses figures as a means of argument and persuasion to draw the audience to side with Jesus and to participate in his message.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Poetry Contests and Competition
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English 8-7-2007 Winning, Losing, and Changing the Rules: The Rhetoric of Poetry Contests and Competition Marc Pietrzykowski Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Pietrzykowski, Marc, "Winning, Losing, and Changing the Rules: The Rhetoric of Poetry Contests and Competition." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2007. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/21 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Winning, Losing, and Changing the Rules: The Rhetoric of Poetry Contest and Competition by Marc Pietrzykowski Under the Direction of Dr. George Pullman ABSTRACT This dissertation attempts to trace the shifting relationship between the fields of Rhetoric and Poetry in Western culture by focusing on poetry contests and competitions during several different historical eras. In order to examine how the distinction between the two fields is contingent on a variety of local factors, this study makes use of research in contemporary cognitive neuroscience, particularly work in categorization and cognitive linguistics, to emphasize the provisional nature of conceptual thought; that is, on the type of mental activity that gives rise to conceptualizations such as “Rhetoric” and “Poetry.” The final portions of the research attempt to use some modeling techniques derived from cognitive linguistics as invention strategies for producing stylistically idiosyncratic academic knowledge, and for examining the relationship between the stylistic markers we associate with each of the two aforementioned fields.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semantic View of Translating Litotes from English Into Arabic
    J J. Edu. Sci., Vol. (19) No. (5) 2012 K The Semantic View of Translating Litotes from English into Arabic Dhuha Ghanim Mohammed Mohammed Nihad Ahmed College of Pharmacy College of Dentistry University of Mosul University of Mosul Received Accepted 09 / 05 / 2011 05 / 10 / 2011 ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺼﺔ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻟﺩﻻﻟﻲ ﻟﺘﺭﺠﻤﺔ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴل ، ﻜﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ . ﻓﻔـﻲ ﺃﺴـﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴل، ﻴﺅﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﺭﺌﻴﺴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺘﻌﺎﺒﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴـل . ﻜﻤـﺎ ﻭﺘﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻅﺎﻫﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﻀﺎﺭﻴﺔ ﺘﺄﺨﺫ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺹ . ﻜﻤﺎ ﻭﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺯﺩﻭﺝ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺼﻴﻐﺘﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻲ ﻓـﻲ ﻋﺒـﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺤﺩﺓ. ﻓﻔﻲ ﻤﻨﻁﻕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺎﺕ ، ﻴﻠﻐﻲ ﻜل ﻤﻥ ﺼﻴﻐﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺇﺤﺩ ﺍﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻵﺨﺭ ﻟﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﺜﺒﺘﺎ . ﻭﻓﻲ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻴﺅﻜﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺒﻌﻀ ﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺽ . ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺼﻁﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ﻟﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﺜﺭ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﻴـﺅﺩﻱ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺍﻹﺜﺒﺎﺕ، ﻫﻭ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴل. Abstract This study deals with the semantic analysis of translating litotes, the rhetorical figure of speech. In litotes, context plays an essential role in determining the overall understanding of the meaning of litotes expressions. The study hypothesizes that the cultural manifestation also plays an essential role to discriminate the meaning of the overall context of the text. Also the paper deals with the case of double negation when two forms of negation are used in the same clause. In some logics and some languages, double negatives cancel each other out and produce an affirmative sense. In other languages, double negatives intensify the negation. The rhetorical term for this effect, when it leads to understand affirmation, is litotes. 1. Litotes: The Rationale Litotes is a rhetorical figure of speech in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Figurative Language Used in Some Poems by Oscar Wilde
    AN ANALYSIS OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE USED IN SOME POEMS BY OSCAR WILDE FINAL PROJECT Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement For Degree of Bachelor in English Education By: Dwi Nur Hasanah 133411007 FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING WALISONGO STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SEMARANG 2018 THESIS STATEMENT I am a student with the following identity : Name : Dwi Nur Hasanah Student Number : 133411007 Department : English Education Certify that the thesis under the title: “AN ANALYSIS OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE USED IN SOME POEMS BY OSCAR WILDE” Is definitely my own work. I am completely responsible for the content of this thesis. The others writers’ opinion or findings included in this thesis are quoted or cited with ethical standards. Semarang, July 5th 2018 The Writer, Dwi Nur Hasanah 133411007 .ii KEMENTERIAN AGAMA UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI WALISONGO FAKULTAS ILMU TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus II Ngaliyan (024) 7601295 Semarang 50185 RATIFICATION Thesis with the following identity: Title : “An Analysis of Figurative Language Used In Some Poems by Oscar Wilde” Name : Dwi Nur Hasanah Student Number : 133411007 Department : English Language Education Had been ratified by the board of examiner of Education and Teacher Training Faculty Walisongo State Islamic University and can be received as one the requirements for gaining the Bachelor Degree in English Language Education. Semarang, July 24th 2018 THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS Chair Person, Secretary, Examiner I, Examiner II, Advisor, Dra. Hj. Siti Mariam, M.Pd NIP. 19650727 199203 2 002 ii. i KEMENTERIAN AGAMA UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI WALISONGO FAKULTAS ILMU TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus II Ngaliyan (024) 7601295 Semarang 50185 ADVISOR APPROVAL Semarang, July 5th 2018 To The Dean of Education and Teacher Training Faculty Walisongo Islamic State University In Semarang Assalamu’alaikum wr.wb.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 OBVIOUSLY, You Will Be Tested on ALL Vocabulary Words
    May 2016 Here is the required summer reading and vocabulary list for all students who will be entering Senior AP Literature in the fall. In September, you will be given tests on vocabulary and literary terms, as well as assessment work on your summer reading. If you have not done the required work, your grades will be profoundly and detrimentally influenced. These works are RELATIVELY SHORT, beautiful, interesting, and very important. They are not trite, they are not boring, they are not to be read with a superficial, unappreciative eye. Excellence makes no excuses! There are no appropriate reasons to dismiss your obligations, so motivate yourself to assume responsibility for your fine minds and get to work! I know that you will! The Plague Camus A Lesson Before Dying Gaines If you do not have a strong memory, take notes for each chapter. Do the work carefully (do not wait until the last minute, or read without thought and perception). In the fall, I will test you with both an objective test and an AP style essay on EACH literary work. OBVIOUSLY, you will be tested on ALL vocabulary words and I expect that you will know them all COLD. Similarly, you must master the enclosed list of LITERARY TERMS. Mastery means (1) knowing the meaning of each term; (2) being able to recognize and analyze examples of each literary characteristic or technique in novels, stories, poems, essays, and dramas; and (3) knowingly and capably using many of these literary techniques in your own writing. Not only will you be tested on these terms in the fall, you will encounter them throughout the school year and repeatedly be required to demonstrate your mastery of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argumentative Litotes in the Analects
    Argument & Computation 8 (2017) 253–266 253 DOI 10.3233/AAC-170029 IOS Press The argumentative litotes in The Analects Ying Yuan Department of English, School of Foreign Languages, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Litotes, often confused with meiosis and understatement, has long suffered neglect. By comparing synonymous key words in previous definitions, this essay defines litotes as “a trope in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite,” and for the first time classifies litotes into three subtypes based upon Aristotle’s study of opposition: contradictory, contrary and relative. Focusing particularly on the strong contradictory type of litotes and its realization in The Analects of Confucius, with its nearly one hundred double negation litotes, we find they prominently serve the logical functions of achieving high probability, providing a sophisticated major premise, and elaborating strict definitions. Further, the essay argues that this strong argumentative function in logic leads to litotes’ epistemic power, a promising dimension for future research. Keywords: Rhetorical figures, tropes, logic, epistemic rhetoric, negation 1. Introduction Scholarship on figures of speech in the past decades has contributed greatly to exploring the func- tions beyond the aesthetic ([13,27,29]); however, most research only investigates a few popular tropes (metaphor and metonymy in particular), leaving many important figures still unattended. Litotes, a pow- erful argumentative figure,
    [Show full text]